Bug#852020: Further Investigation

2017-01-21 Thread Bachsau
I further investigated this error and it seems it has to do with my system already using the new directory structure, where /lib is symlinked to /usr/lib and your packages tries to place an aditional symlink in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpng12.so.0 which would then link to itself. However, /u

Bug#852020: libpng12.so.0: Unable to install upgrade

2017-01-20 Thread Bachsau
Package: libpng12-0 Version: 1.2.50-2+deb8u2 Severity: grave File: libpng12.so.0 Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, I was unable to upgrade the package yesterday and today as it tells me it can not install a new version of /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpng12.so.0 because th

Bug#811031: (no subject)

2016-03-27 Thread Bachsau
I would blame xorg for breaking compatibility. It is an excellent example of open source projects placing unnecessary obstacles in their own way. I don't think there really was a reason for this. It is just because some developer thought something would be more perfectly handled in another way

Bug#770105: php5-common: sed call in cron script fails with "invalid opdtion -- 'z'"

2014-11-18 Thread Bachsau
This again sheds a bad light on the quality of debian and its security/testing procedures. In quiet commemoration of the OpenSSL bug... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org