Thanks for your answer.
I have replaced pop.nerim.fr by pop.nerim.net and it works as expected.
This configuration worked fine with pop.nerim.fr for a very long time
until last upgrade of feetchmail.
Best regards,
JB
Package: fetchmail
Version: 6.4.0~beta4-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I use ferchmail for a while and I have seen in syslog that fetchmail
returns errors:
fetchmail: Loaded OpenSSL library 0x1010102f newer than headers 0x1010101f,
trying to continue.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Gabriel Filion a écrit :
> On 2019-03-26 2:43 p.m., Gabriel Filion wrote:
>> Did you recently upgrade smokeping? if so what version were you
>> using before? (maybe check your dpkg logs for signs of upgrade of
>> the smokeping package)
>
> I just th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Gabriel Filion a écrit :
> Hi Bertrand,
Hello,
> e.g. the file is in /run/smokeping and systemd is able to use it
> to restart the servce.
In my case, systemd doesn't create /run/smokeping.
> Did you recently upgrade smokeping? if
Package: smokeping
Version: 2.7.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I have restarted a server last sunday and I have seen that smokeping doesn't
start anymore.
In systemd config file, smokeping is launched with --pid-dir=/run/smokeping and
systemd complai
Marcus Schopen a écrit :
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 09.12.2015, 12:57 +0100 schrieb BERTRAND Joël:
I have downgraded sendmail to 8.14.4 (built from debian/stable sources)
and sendmail runs as expected. Please remove faulty package or apply
last sendmail patches that fix this known issue.
Have you
I have downgraded sendmail to 8.14.4 (built from debian/stable sources)
and sendmail runs as expected. Please remove faulty package or apply
last sendmail patches that fix this known issue.
Best regards,
JKB
JKB wrote:
> I have a sendmail server (8.15.2) running debian linux,
spamassasin,
> clamav and milter-greylist (4.4.3 and I have tried 4.5.16). This
> configuration ran like a charm until last sendmail upgrade.
So what are the changes in that "last sendmail upgrade"?
Is that
250-rayleigh.systella.fr Hello mta.partenaire.viadeo.com
[136.147.180.10], pleased to meet you
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-PIPELINING
250-EXPN
250-VERB
250-8BITMIME
250-SIZE
250-DSN
250-ETRN
250-AUTH NTLM PLAIN LOGIN
250-STARTTLS
250-DELIVERBY
250 HELP
10:25:15.695375 IP mta.partenaire.viadeo.co
Source: sendmail
Version: 8.15.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I use for a long time a sendmail configuration with debian clamav and
spamassassin milters and a customized milter greylist (same sources that
debian's milter but with some different compil
Hello,
I have seen the same bug, but I'm not sure that it is related to kernel
upgrade. Indeed, if I reboots my Lenovo Edge E325 with 3.10-2 kernel,
wmbattery only indicates 0.
Regards,
JB
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
Hi,
BERTRAND Joël (18/04/2011):
Section "Files"
FontPath"unix/:7100"
please try getting rid of that.
If I remove xfs from xorg.conf, X doesn't crash anymore.
Regards,
JKB
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Bernhard R. Link a écrit :
reportbug -b -s "followup" -S normal -p xorg> log
Subject: followup
Package: xorg
Version: 1:7.6+6
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
X server symlink status:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Apr 3 2009 /etc/X11/X -> /usr/bin/Xorg
-rw
Bernhard R. Link a écrit :
* BERTRAND Benedicte [110417 17:33]:
When I try to launch gv, X session (xfce, gnome, windowmaker) aborts.
This bug occurs even if gv is launched without any argument from command line.
I'm unable to obtain more information in log files.
I think it is very unlikely
Package: libglib2.0-0
Version: 2.20.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
I'm trying to build seamonkey 1.1.15 from sources (I don't like
iceweasel,
I prefered iceape, and note that iceweasel hangs with a SIGBUS too).
I have fixed some misal
Stefan Fritsch a écrit :
Hi Joel,
can you tell if the errors started after you did some upgrade (e.g.
apache or subversion)? Have they just started or have they occured
for some weeks now?
If the errors are not new, you could try to rebuild the subversion
packages and replace libsvn1 and li
Stefan Fritsch a écrit :
Hi Joel,
Hello Stephan,
can you tell if the errors started after you did some upgrade (e.g.
apache or subversion)? Have they just started or have they occured
for some weeks now?
I don't know, but a month ago, my SVN repository worked fine.
If the
Hello,
I have exactly hesame bug with
Root rayleigh:[~] > dpkg-query -l apache2* | grep ^ii
ii apache2 2.2.9-2
Apache HTTP Server metapackage
ii apache2-mpm-prefork 2.2.9-2
Apache HTTP Server - tradit
Jurij Smakov a écrit :
Hi Joel,
Hello Jurij,
Sorry, I cannot reproduce the behavior you are describing. I have a
SS20 box, running sid with Debian's linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc32
(version 2.6.18-6) kernel:
I don't try with debian package, only with official linux kernel. I
have te
Guillem Jover a écrit :
Hi,
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 19:19:58 +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.24
Architecture: sparc
Severity: grave
I have some SparcSTATION 20 with one or two SuperSPARC-II and 448 MB
of memory (thus, HIGHMEM is used). On these workstations, dpkg
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.24
Architecture: sparc
Severity: grave
Hello,
I have some SparcSTATION 20 with one or two SuperSPARC-II and 448 MB of
memory (thus, HIGHMEM is used). On these workstations, dpkg works fine.
If I replace SuperSPARC-II by one, two or four ROSS RT-626, I canno
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.59b
Severity: grave
Arch: sparc
It is impossible to build a ramfs image on a HyperSPARC
workstation. I have try to install etch/sparc on a SS20 that runs with
four HyperSPARC processors. When it boots, system hangs when it tries to
load the ramfs image.
22 matches
Mail list logo
