Package: libclc-amdgcn
Version: 0.2.0+git20160907-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Tags: upstream patch
Hardware information:
- platform: Clover (Mesa)
- device: AMD OLAND (DRM 2.48.0 / 4.9.0-2-amd64, LLVM 3.9.1)
With the libclc version from testing nearly all OpenCL
Hello Sylvestre,
Installing clang and llvm-runtime packages on my Debian testing, here is
what I get :
$ cat hello.c
#include
int main (void) {
printf ("Hello, world!\n");
return 0;
}
$ clang -emit-llvm -c hello.c && lli hello.o
lli: hello.o: unknown type in type table
However,
Hi,
2010/5/30, Mehdi Dogguy :
> It *does* matter! When I have to open some META file by hand to see its
> content, it's much more easier to know beforehand (and without looking
> for it) where it is. For now, the situation is not uniform: most of the
> people put the META file under +$lib/META, so
reassign 559721 ldc
retitle 559721 Needs porting on s390
severity 559721 wishlist
thanks
libtango has never been built on s390.
2009/12/6, Bastian Blank :
> Source: libtango
> Version: 0.99.8+svn5259.dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
>> sb
Package: llvm-snapshot
Severity: serious
llvm-snapshot is not intended to be ever released with a stable Debian
release. This bug is intended to serve as a marker bug to make sure
llvm-snapshot won't enter resting.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
It seems I gave-it back too, at the same time, hadn't seen your mail yet ... :-)
2009/8/19, Andreas Barth :
> * Paul Wise (p...@debian.org) [090819 15:28]:
>> It appears the main difference between failure and success in the
>> experimental buildds was gcc-4.3 4.3.3-13 vs 4.3.3-14. Since gcc-4.3 h
Probably my fault, I'll have a look. Thanks for reporting.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: inkscape
Version: 0.46-6
Severity: serious
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Tags: patch
Hi,
The linker defaults to "relax" option, which causes the GPREL16 relocation
errors. A quick workaround is to add -Wl,--no-relax to LDFLAGS.
--- inkscape-0.46/debian/rules 2009-03-29 22:29:23.
Hey Manuel,
No problem, I'll have a look and test it in a very few days, thanks a
lot for it!
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: openmpi
Version: 1.3-2
Severity: serious
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Tags: patch
Hi,
There is an issue with using TIMER_CYCLE_COUNTER as TIMER on alpha
(it uses TSC), so alpha should use TIMER_GETTIMEOFDAY. Here is a quick
patch:
--- a/ompi/contrib/vt/vt/configure
+++ b/ompi/con
Package: network-manager
Version: 0.7.0.97-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Tags: patch
Hi,
network-manager_0.7.0.97 fails to build on alpha because of a false-positive
warning from gcc-4.2 (should not happen with gcc-4.3), here is a quick patch
to fix it, which can be remo
Package: gupnp
Version: 0.12.6-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Build failed on alpha because of:
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for LIBGUPNP... configure: error: Package requirements
(glib-2.0 >= 2.18 gobject-2.0 >= 2.18
g
Package: gssdp
Version: 0.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Build failed on alpha because of:
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for LIBGSSDP... configure: error: Package requirements
(glib-2.0 >= 2.18 gobject-2.0 >= 2.18
li
tags 507090 + wontfix
thanks
The package has been reintroduced (version 1.16.0-1) to the archive only for
spu (powerpc and ppc64 only) and the testing version is not supposed to build
on anything else.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 08:14:31PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> tags 499931 + patch pending
> thanks
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for gdc-4.2 (versioned as 0.25-4.2.4-3.1) will
> upload provided that it builds correctly. Note that the maintainer
> should look into pruning unne
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 03:53:25PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Package: gcc-snapshot
> Version: 20080523-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Heya,
>
> Building the snapshot package failed on my buildd when preparing the
> sources:
>
This is because the sparc-biarch patch conflicts with the rec
0332f0e06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arthur Loiret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 09:45:36 +
Subject: [PATCH] * Fix multiarch headers installation on mips{,el}:
- Install ABI O32 headers in /usr/include/mips{,el}-linux-gnu
- Install ABI 64 headers in /usr/include/mips
Hi Thiemo,
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 04:13:20PM +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote:
> With this patch /usr/include/mips64-linux-gnu/ is installed in both
> libn32ffi-dev and lib64ffi-dev, please wait for my next patch.
Here is the diff between header from mips and mips64 builds (it is the same for
With this patch /usr/include/mips64-linux-gnu/ is installed in both
libn32ffi-dev and lib64ffi-dev, please wait for my next patch.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
and
debian/libn32ffi-dev/usr/include/ which fails.
There is also a small typo (s/32n/n32/), this patch fixes the problems.
From 1468a32948c2a04d016b7f4cd0f9c9b9998a7fc9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arthur Loiret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 13:37:19 +
Subject: [PATCH] Fix
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 10:34:05PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> No.
>
> Please post a full patch and I'll double check it and do the upload.
>
Here are the two source packages including debdiffs and amd64/ia64 binaries:
http://ada.lri.fr/~arthur/ia32-libs/
Thanks,
Arthur.
signature.as
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 09:37:02PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Will you do an upload for ia32-libs-gtk at the same time with the
> removed packages, proper replaces and conflicts and check rdepends?
Sure. And if you're already OK I can do the uploads today.
signature.asc
Description: D
severity 472867 normal
thanks
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:38:53PM +0100, Cyprien LAPLACE wrote:
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Not that much.
> gcc-4.3 forgets some checks in -O2 and -O3, tested on x86_64 and arm
> (cross-compiler) targets.
Can you please report th
severity normal
thanks
Install newlib-spu or add -nostdlib if you want to link without spu libc. I'll
add newlib-spu to gcc-4.3-spu's Recommends.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 02:32:36PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> Package: gcc-4.3-spu
> Version: 4.3.0-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders pack
tags 474825 + pending
thanks
Will upload tomorrow.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tags 458870 + pending
thanks
Hi,
I'm preparing the upload, thanks for the patch!
Arthur.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
:55.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+gcc-defaults (1.61.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add gdc, make gdc-4.1 the default. Closes: #456596
+
+ -- Arthur Loiret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:17:51 +0100
+
gcc-defaults (1.61) unstable; urgency=medium
*
reassign 456596 gcc-defaults 1.61
thanks
Matthias,
Here is the diff against current SVN I already sent you.
Cheers,
Arthur.
From 3c86dc3d32b0570aa29e8b8e7dfd9bd69f186b02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arthur Loiret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:40:33 +0100
Subject:
I've contacted upstream author to know if he plan to publish a 0.5
release soon, otherwise I'll put the svn diff in a patch.
Arthur.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tags 443744 + upstream confirmed
thanks
Reported upstream:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1800931&group_id=154306&atid=791252
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 443206 + upstream
severity 443206 serious
thanks
Reported upstream: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479722
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 443148 wishlist
merge 439573 443148
thanks
Hello,
gdc is only ported upstream on i386, amd64, powerpc, and on
kfreebsd-gnu (will be on next upload), setting severity to wishlist
since a port is needed then.
main gdc ports bug is: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=439573
Thanks for your bug report, I'm going to merge this alternative
package into mine, and hope it will fix this.
Would you be interested to co-maintain it in Debian Jordà ?
Have a nice day,
Arthur.
severity 439573 important
thanks
> No buildd is able to build it. amd64 and i386 was not uploaded from a
> buildd, the others failed.
You'll find the full amd64 build log here [0], excelsior has been able
to build it, and amd64 package has been uploaded from it.
[0]
http://buildd.debian.org/fet
34 matches
Mail list logo
