On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 11:05:53AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Source: log4cplus
> Version: 1.1.2-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: completely broken lib directory
>
> Hi, seems that the current log4cplus unconditionally installs the library
> symlink in
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:04:36PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared a NMU for log4cplus, to deal with the libstdc++ transition,
> and will shortly upload it to the 1-day delayed queue. Please find the
> debdiff below.
So I've just uploaded 1.1.2 to experimental a
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:49:21PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
> Control: tag -1 confirmed
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 13:12:38 +, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> > - Rebuild the library using g++/g++-5 from experimental. Note that
> >most likely all C++ librari
Hi,
It looks like rcs-blame has bitrotted a bit with GCC-5. Is this something
you could address?
If you maintain the Cc on this email, our bug tracking system will be kept
in the loop.
regards
Andrew
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:36:32AM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:rcs-blame
> Ver
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 03:10:17AM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>
> Andrew, do you have any historical knowledge about this?
I have this funny feeling that it's always done this, from before I took
over maintenance of it. You're right though, this is clearly suboptimal, so
we should fix it. I wi
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:03:39PM +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:03:22AM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> >
> >
> > argus-server: lintian output: 'embedded-library usr/sbin/argus: libpcap',
> > automatically rejected package.
> > argus-server: If you have a
severity 678968 normal
thanks
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:48:53PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Having this, I'm usure the bug is really 'grave', as the intended use
> of the pam-module is documented this way.
Thank you for doing the research, Salvatore.
Given the original submitter has no
https://github.com/PromyLOPh/pianobar/issues/236#issuecomment-5436544
implies that we can expect a new upstream release in a week or so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 09:28:48PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> El 7 de març de 2012 20:15, Andrew Pollock ha escrit:
> > I just heard back that they're running behind schedule by about a month, so
> > I'll proceed with making a release with a stripped tarball to addres
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:48:48AM +, peter green wrote:
>
> >I just reviewed the most recent email I exchanged with the ISC product
> >manager, and she actually said "end of February", although she wasn't a
> >betting woman.
> >
> >So let's wait until March 1 to take stock of the situation. I
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:48:48AM +, peter green wrote:
>
> >I just reviewed the most recent email I exchanged with the ISC product
> >manager, and she actually said "end of February", although she wasn't a
> >betting woman.
> >
> >So let's wait until March 1 to take stock of the situation. I
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 11:03:17PM +, peter green wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have been working with upstream on addressing both of these issues, and I
>> am hopeful that the 4.2.4 release, which is due in the next couple of
>> months, to address these issues. I'm waiting to see how much better
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:33:52PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 13:22:27 -0800, Andrew Pollock wrote:
>
> > I have been working with upstream on addressing both of these issues, and I
> > am hopeful that the 4.2.4 release, which is due in the next co
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 07:29:19PM +, peter green wrote:
> Currently, the version of isc-dhcp-client in unstable suffers two rc
> bugs, a FTBFS bug ( 643569 ) and a non-free IETF documents bug ( 645760
> ) both related to embedded bind source.
>
> Furthermore isc-dhcp-client FTBFS in testin
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 06:04:41PM +, Tomasz Mrugalski via RT wrote:
> Thank you for reporting this bug. It is already fixed in BIND 9.8.2rc1. That
> verison is planned to be included in the next ISC DHCP release. The code now
> builds properly on my Debian box with kFreeBSD kernel.
>
Thanks.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 05:21:29PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> tag 645670 patch
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is a patch that fixes these two issues. It dynamically links to
> bind and removes the embedded code (note that it would be more ideal
> to repackage the upstream source without bind, bu
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 11:43:18PM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
> found 643569 4.2.2-2
> bye
>
> Hi!
>
> Still failing the same way on kfreebsd. See
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=isc-dhcp&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=4.2.2-2&stamp=1325997447
>
Agreed that it's still failing, but
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 07:11:43PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> tags 648676 patch
> thanks
>
> I'll upload this NMU later the day. This removes the option to set a
> hostname from the script completely. Further changes needs to move this
> file to be a conffile.
>
I just got around to looking a
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 07:44:25PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:26:54AM -0800, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > Please don't.
>
> You got until end of the week.
I don't like being given ultimatums. I'm well aware of the issue, and I will
get a
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 07:11:43PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> tags 648676 patch
> thanks
>
> I'll upload this NMU later the day. This removes the option to set a
> hostname from the script completely. Further changes needs to move this
> file to be a conffile.
>
Please don't.
I have a large
Package: python-asterisk
Version: 0.1a3+r160-4.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I tried to use python-asterisk to connect to my Asterisk server, after recently
upgrading to Squeeze, and it failed to connect, raising an excep
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:25:39AM -0500, Tim Heckman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> >
> > I've actually been poking at this some more, and it turns out I've made a
> > grave error in assuming that by not requesting a particular
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 09:27:12AM -0500, Tim Heckman wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Thank you for explaining the policy on your policy being no policy. :p
No worries :-)
> But in all seriousness. I completely forgot about the hooks that can be
> used for DHCP and I entirely agree this makes more sense
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 07:06:52PM -0500, Tim Heckman wrote:
[snip]
>
> Andrew,
>
> Thanks for the information about how it'll be implemented moving forward.
> Not to shy too far off-topic, I'm just trying to explain my use case for
> this. I work for a pretty well known cloud services provider
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 03:06:03PM -0500, Tim Heckman wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Andrew Pollock wrote:
>
> >
> > dhclient-script got some major overhauling in 4.2.2-1, and your patch is no
> > longer applicable.
> >
> > Is the original bug still
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 06:35:37PM -0400, Tim Heckman wrote:
> User error on my last diff here is an updated one that is correct:
>
dhclient-script got some major overhauling in 4.2.2-1, and your patch is no
longer applicable.
Is the original bug still present in 4.2.2-1?
regards
Andrew
sign
- Forwarded message from DHCP Bugs via RT -
From: DHCP Bugs via RT
To: apoll...@debian.org
Subject: [ISC-Bugs #26650] AutoReply: Please remove RFCs from embedded BIND
sources
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 04:43:25 +
Greetings,
This message has been automatically generated in response t
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:37:39AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: isc-dhcp-client
> Version: 4.2.2-1
> Severity: critical
>
> dhclient-script changes the hostname without being asked to do so. This
> breaks all kinds of stuff that relates to the hostname, like sudo. And
> it is also wrong,
Hi,
Could you please remove the RFCs from the embedded BIND sources in the DHCP
sources? As they're non-free, this makes DHCP non-free from Debian's
perspective, which royally complicates things.
Please maintain the Cc of this email to keep our bug tracking system in the
loop.
regards
Andrew
-
Hello,
Due to a rather fabulous chain of events, I can't build 4.2.2 with GCC 4.6.1
(which is what we're using in Debian to build packages in unstable)
In a nutshell, it looks like configure.ac completely clobbers CFLAGS under
some circumstances, and adds the -Werror flag. The -Werror flag now se
Hello,
4.2.2 doesn't build on kfreebsd. See
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643569 for more details.
I've been given a patch that fixes it, but it needs to be made to the BIND
sources that are in the tarball that gets unpacked at build time, so I don't
have a good way of applying
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 08:11:44PM +0200, Tomáš Janoušek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 09:57:17AM -0700, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 02:23:23PM +0200, Tomas Janousek wrote:
> > > It's not fixed in 4.1.1-P1-17. The hostname is being
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 06:36:23PM +0200, Peter Marschall wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Tomas has a point here.
> While the part regarding the invalid variables was fixed in 4.1.1-17,
> the logic still looks a bit fishy:
> "only set the host name if the old one and the new one are given"
> (I am aware
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 02:23:23PM +0200, Tomas Janousek wrote:
> reopen 628141
> thanks
>
> It's not fixed in 4.1.1-P1-17. The hostname is being reset to whatever DHCP
> says, even if the machine is supposed to have a fixed hostname. The problem
> with X rejecting connections was experienced wit
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
# via tagpending
#
# barada-pam (0.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * Add patch from Andreas Moog to fix FTBFS with gold or ld --no-add-needed
#(closes: #615696)
#
package barada-pam libpam-barada
tags 615696 + pending
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:30:33AM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are you working on an updated squeeze package for this? If not, I'll
> prepare one for a DSA since the patch is fairly straightforward.
>
If you could do an update for Squeeze I'd really appreciate it.
signature.asc
De
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 01:09:30PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 07:58:24 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 09:51:05PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > >
> > > Hmm, that was a misunderstanding, then: It was tagged
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
# via tagpending
#
# isc-dhcp (4.1.1-P1-16) unstable; urgency=high
#
# * Patch by Raphael Geissert from 4.1-ESV for CVE-2011-0413 (closes: #611217)
package dhcp3-common dhcp3-client dhcp3-relay isc-dhcp-server-ldap dhcp3
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 09:51:05PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>
> Hmm, that was a misunderstanding, then: It was tagged by release managers as
> not-a-blocker, i.e. it doesn't hold back the release if not fixed, a fix
> through unstable would still have been possible. Any way, not it's too
>
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 09:15:39PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>
> Why was there no maintainer reaction since a week? No we need to prepare
> a DSA for this :-/
>
There was no maintainer reaction because I thought previous responses were
that it was okay to deal with post-release. Is this no
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 08:43:00PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> severity 548099 serious
Please explain your rationale for making this a release critical bug.
According to http://release.debian.org/lenny/arch_qualify.ht
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
# via tagpending
#
# isc-dhcp (4.1.1-P1-10) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Added patch from Simon McVittie to stop unnecessary linking with libcrypto
#(closes: #592361)
#
package dhcp3-common dhcp3-client dhcp3-relay i
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 07:08:08PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 at 03:16:59 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > ../configure: line 5723: syntax error near unexpected token `OPENSSL,'
> > ../configure: line 5723: ` PKG_CHECK_MODULES(OPENSSL
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:01:06PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> A possible patch follows.
> S
Dude. Thank you so much for this patch. I've been lacking the time to dive
into this particular bug. Unfortunately, I've been unable to get a
successful build.
./configure: line 5723: syntax err
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
# via tagpending
#
# isc-dhcp (4.1.1-P1-9) UNRELEASED; urgency=high
#
# * debian/control: really don't make the new packages conflict with the
#old/transitional packages (closes: #590186)
#
package dhcp3-common dhcp3-
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:10:39PM -0400, micah anderson wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:23:25 +1000, Andrew Pollock
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 10:15:14AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > install -Dp -m0644 -o puppet -g puppet
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 10:15:14AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > install -Dp -m0644 -o puppet -g puppet ext/rack/files/config.ru \
> >
> > /build/user-puppet_0.25.4-3-amd64-zxBvTe/puppet-0.25.4/debian/puppetmaster/usr/share/puppet/rack/puppetmasterd
> > install: invalid user `puppet
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:25:12PM +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here's my 5 minute try of converting elfsign to use sha1. It builds fine, but
> I must admit that I have no clue how to test it. Maybe it helps
> nonetheless...
>
Hi Stefan,
I'd missed the fact that you'd done this until
tags 555668 + help
thanks
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 04:17:19PM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> * Andrew Pollock [091115 16:47]
>
> > What's the status of elfsign? It doesn't look like you've made a new release
> > in nearly 5 ye
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
# via tagpending
#
# puppet (0.25.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * cherry pick upstream fix for puppetrun with tags (closes: #559092)
# * cherry pick upstream fix for supplementary groups not being reset.
#(CVE-2009-3
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
# via tagpending
#
# puppet (0.25.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * Require modification of /etc/default/puppet to start puppet client daemon.
#(closes: #518831)
# * cherry pick upstream fix for puppetrun with tags (cl
Fixed: 0.25.2-1
This looks feasible to backport to 0.24.5
Commit:
http://projects.reductivelabs.com/projects/puppet/repository/revisions/e32f980fd7c6291abc2841ede397c962798d9a9c/diff
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 05:56:58PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attached is a debdiff of the changes I made for 3.1.2p1-1.1 2-day NMU
Thanks. I'm making an upload now.
regards
Andrew
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: trousers
Version: 0.3.1-9
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 9.3.2
Hi,
When tcsd is not already running, say because of #521245, upgrading to say
0.3.1-9 fails, because the when the
trousers prerm tries to stop tcsd, it's already not running. The init script
should not return non-z
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
# via tagpending
#
# puppet (0.24.8-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=high
#
# * Re-ship the vim syntax file in the correct location (it fell out after the
#0.24.5-3 upload) (closes: #530752)
# * debian/puppet.postrm: don't dele
Hi,
Given #495683 is months old, and the maintainer hasn't commented on it, and
it's never been in a stable release, should it just get removed from
testing?
regards
Andrew
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 02:49:06PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
>
> > while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build
> > from
> > source for the following reason:
> >
> > > dh_clean -k
> > > dh_installdirs
> > > # Add her
ner upload.
+ * Apply patch from Nelson A. de Oliveira to fix missing dependency on
+lsb-base (closes: #403294)
+
+ -- Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:37:05 -0800
+
aoetools (11-1.1) unstable; urgency=high
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u aoetools-11/debian/control ao
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:22:32PM -0200, Fernando Ike de Oliveira wrote:
> Em Ter, 2006-12-12 às 19:25 +0100, Hermann Schwarting escreveu:
>
> > The package contains only the files under /usr/share/doc/tclxml and
> > nothing else.
> >
>
> Hi.
>
> This is critical bug and a greatest failed
Khalid,
I've made a 0-day NMU of Christian's patch to fix this bug.
regards
Andrew
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 03:51:02PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Package: mypasswordsafe
> Severity: serious
> Version: 0.0.20050615-1
>
> Hi
>
> Your package fails to build from source with sudo as gain-root comma
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 04:34:58AM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 03:51:02PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Your package fails to build from source with sudo as gain-root command
> > as can be seen in the build log on the alpha buildd [1].
>
> The problem is that qmake au
Package: asterisk-app-fax
Version: 0.0.20060218-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I was troubleshooting why another AGI script wasn't working, when I
discovered that whilst /var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin is where receive_fax is
installed, /etc/asterisk/asterisk.conf has
astagi
reopen 340660
thanks
I'm smoking crack.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I've just made a QA upload of xcircuit, which works for me on x86. Can you
please test it in powerpc and let me know if this problem still exists?
regards
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 325605 + moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 08:27:40PM +0200, Sebastien Bernard wrote:
> Package: dhcp3-server
> Version: 3.0.2-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> dhcp3-server do a sigsegv each time a client send a request for a lease.
> Recompiling the pa
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:31:49AM -0600, Valerio Aimale wrote:
>
> Andrew,
>
> I've tested the preliminary 3.0.3-0 and it works fine with
> one-lease-per-client set to on. Leases are obtained correctly and no
> more infinite loops.
>
> Thank you for your help
>
Great. I'll look at making a f
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:53:00AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 05-Aug-25 11:46, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/qa/robotour-3.1.1$ patch -p0 --dry-run <
> > /tmp/robotour.patch
> > patching file ./libRT/rtcollect.special.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 07:26:34PM -0600, Valerio Aimale wrote:
>
> andrew,
>
> thank you for your reply, I will check 3.0.2 out and will report you my
> findings.
>
There is a preliminary package of dhcp3-3.0.3 available at
http://people.debian.org/~apollock/dhcp3
Please test it (or build i
Hi,
I was looking to apply this patch as part of a QA upload, however it didn't
apply cleanly:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/qa/robotour-3.1.1$ patch -p0 --dry-run <
/tmp/robotour.patch
patching file ./libRT/rtcollect.special.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 100 (offset 15 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 127 (o
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 02:00:38PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Package: dhcp3-server
> Version: 3.0.2-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
>
> This breaks with dash:
>
> - if ! /usr/sbin/dhcpd3 -t >& /dev/null; then
> + if ! /usr/sbin/dhcpd3 -t 2>&1 /dev/null; then
>
Nice of you to
Hi Thomas,
I'm trying to understand this release critical bug.
I can see that make-fai-nfsroot wants to install ext2resize into the NFS
root that it creates, because it is listed in $packages in
/etc/fai/make-fai-nfsroot.conf, but I can't see any further use of it. I
grepped all the files that ar
Hi Dan,
I see you've recently orphaned kernel-patch-redhat. Maybe you're better off
just requesting its removal from the archive, given that it has a release
critical bug filed against it, which suggests it's going to be useless in
Sarge anyway?
Just my $AUD 0.05 worth.
regards
Andrew
--
linu
Package: argus-server
Severity: grave
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 01:14:31PM -0600, Jason Wohlford wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I'm having some trouble uninstalling argus-server from Sarge. Here's my
> aptitude output. Any ideas?
>
> Cheers,
> Jason
>
> (Reading database ... 45960 files and directories
73 matches
Mail list logo
