Your message dated Sun, 13 Apr 2025 23:15:03 -0700
with message-id <8a478d94019b6bf7160e9cb53922845c28d3af7d.ca...@ghic.org>
and subject line numba: autopkgtest regression: segmentation fault on arm64
has caused the Debian Bug report #1033907,
regarding numba: autopkgtest regression: segmentation f
Hi Sergio,
On 2025-04-12 23:48, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
On Saturday, April 12 2025, Santiago Vila wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
Fixed and uploaded.
Thanks a lot for fixing this! Please also push the changes to salsa
after such uplo
On 2025-04-13 Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> brian m. carlson (one of the git upstream copyright holders) claims
> in Bug #1094969 that git cannot be distributed when linked with
> OpenSSL. IIRC the Debian position is to use the system library
> exception.
> Indeed our /usr/lib/git-core/git-remot
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1103008 https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/issues/13757
Bug #1103008 [src:ocaml] ocaml: FTBFS in testing/arm64: failed tests
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/issues/13757'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
P
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1102379 + patch
Bug #1102379 [src:hyperkitty] hyperkitty: FTBFS: FAIL: test_header
(hyperkitty.tests.test_templatetags.TestDecorate.test_header)
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
On Sat 2025-04-12 08:28:31 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Thanks to both of you for the kick turnaround! It looks like gpgv-udeb
> 2.4.7-14 has satisfiable dependencies *and* manages to validate mirrors
> from within d-i.
Great to hear! I appreciate your following up to let us know that the
fix
Your message dated Sun, 13 Apr 2025 20:43:59 -0700
with message-id <8c4263860a40af53ec8f9cc612f5afbfc01d02a6.ca...@ghic.org>
and subject line resampy: FTBFS: E ImportError: Numba could not be imported.
has caused the Debian Bug report #1090292,
regarding resampy: FTBFS: E ImportError: Numba could n
Hi maintainers and Fiona,
On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 15:08:17 +0200 Fiona Ebner wrote:
> I've opened a merge request on Salsa that should address this:
> https://salsa.debian.org/mailman-team/hyperkitty/-/merge_requests/4
Thanks for the patch! I've prepared a team upload (I think it's better
than a nmu
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertags 1102440 + patch + bsp-2025-04-brazil
thanks
Hi,
The attached debdiff fixes a policy violation in xrt where a
compiler flag was conditionally applied only in unstable.
Best regards,
Matheus Polkorny
diff -Nru xrt-202210.2.13.466+dfsg/debian/changelog
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1094536 ruby-actionpack
Bug #1094536 {Done: Pirate Praveen }
[src:ruby-factory-bot-rails] ruby-factory-bot-rails: FTBFS: ERROR: Test
"ruby3.3" failed: cannot load such file -- rack/session/abstract/id
Bug reassigned from package 'src:ru
On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 12:20:05PM +, Julien Plissonneau Duquène wrote:
> Control: tag -1 pending
>
> Hello,
>
> Bug #1099295 in uncommons-watchmaker reported by you has been fixed in the
> Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
> message below and you can check the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1086090 0.61.0+dfsg-1
Bug #1086090 [src:numba] numba FTBFS with Python 3.13
Marked as fixed in versions numba/0.61.0+dfsg-1.
Bug #1086090 [src:numba] numba FTBFS with Python 3.13
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Hello,
Upstream doesn't support mips or s390x, and the ppcle64 support is
unofficial.
https://numba.readthedocs.io/en/stable/user/installing.html
Honestly I think their supporting for arm64 started catching up to
amd64 due to apple's new laptops.
Is there a way to build the other architectures
close 1086090 0.61.0+dfsg-1
thanks
Update to new version fixed the problems with Python 3.13 as well as numpy 2.2
Dear maintainer,
I've uploaded an NMU for clues-emacs (versioned as 1.0.1-3.2).
The diff is attached to this message.
cu
Adrian
diffstat for clues-emacs-1.0.1 clues-emacs-1.0.1
changelog |7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff -Nru clues-emacs-1.0.1/debian/changelog clues-emacs-1.
Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2025 00:33:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1077097: fixed in clues-emacs 1.0.1-3.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1077097,
regarding clues-emacs: needs rebuild against dh-elpa >=2.1.5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Hi maintainers,
On Sun, 6 Apr 2025 01:06:44 -0300 Matheus Polkorny wrote:
> user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
> usertags 1101500 + bsp-2025-04-brazil
> thanks
>
> I have imported and refreshed the upstream patch to address CVE-2025-2849.
>
> More details can be found in the following merge r
On 2025-04-13 at 22:53:45, Simon McVittie wrote:
> openldap is not the only relevant dependency chain. There is also at least:
>
> git -> libcurl3t64-gnutls -> libgssapi-krb5-2 -> libkrb5-3 -> libssl3t64
I think this dependency only exists because of the spake preauth plugin
and the main libkrb5.
Your message dated Sun, 13 Apr 2025 23:06:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1101346: fixed in linuxcnc 1:2.9.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1101346,
regarding linuxcnc-uspace: move aliased files from / to /usr (DEP17)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 10:42:24PM +0100, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote:
> A fix [1] for the IO_PAGE_FAULT went into xen 4.20 which is now available in
> testing and unstable.
> The 4.20.0-1 Debian source package can also be compiled for bookworm if you
> have a bookworm system running and want to
Your message dated Sun, 13 Apr 2025 22:34:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1078386: fixed in gnome-chemistry-utils 0.14.17-6.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1078386,
regarding gnome-chemistry-utils: FTBFS: gunicode.h:809:34: error: invalid
conversion from 'const char*' to 'char*'
Quoting Fabian Grünbichler (2025-04-12 16:13:42)
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2025, at 9:37 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2025-04-07 09:29:04)
> >> Package: librust-secret-service-dev
> >> Version: 4.0.0-4
> >> Severity: grave
> >>
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash:
On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 at 11:58:57 +0100, Samuel Henrique wrote:
Based on the replies to https://mastodon.social/@bagder/114329630276196304,
where there was some uncertainty around where the issue comes from, I figured I
should clarify it here:
git on Debian ends up indirectly linked to OpenSSL thr
Package: libspglib-f08-dev
Version: 2.6.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fileconflict
libspglib-f08-dev fails to coinstall despite explicitly declaring that
capability via Multi-Arch: same. The file
/usr/include/Spglib_Fortran/GNU-14.2.0/spglib_f08.mod has different
Control: tags 1078386 + patch
Dear maintainer,
I've uploaded an NMU for gnome-chemistry-utils (versioned as 0.14.17-6.3).
The diff is attached to this message.
cu
Adrian
diffstat for gnome-chemistry-utils-0.14.17 gnome-chemistry-utils-0.14.17
changelog |7 +++
rules |2 +-
2 fi
Processing control commands:
> tags 1078386 + patch
Bug #1078386 [src:gnome-chemistry-utils] gnome-chemistry-utils: FTBFS:
gunicode.h:809:34: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'char*'
[-fpermissive]
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1078386: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
Your message dated Sun, 13 Apr 2025 22:04:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1095672: fixed in g10k 0.9.10-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1095672,
regarding g10k :FTBFS:build failed ( -race is not supported on linux/*)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for g10k (versioned as 0.9.10-1.1). The diff
is attached to this message.
Chris
diff -Nru g10k-0.9.10/debian/changelog g10k-0.9.10/debian/changelog
--- g10k-0.9.10/debian/changelog 2025-02-19 16:11:43.0 +0100
+++ g10k-0.9.10/debian/changelog 2025-04-
Hi,
this problem is not MNT Reform-specific. I just reproduced it with
linux-image-cloud-arm64 in QEMU via debvm.
Quoting Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues (2025-04-13 08:46:21)
> > Presuming this isn't some bizarre fluke, then this bug is likely present in
> > most versions of flash-kernel, as th
Le dimanche 13 avril 2025, 22:47:54 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Chris
Hofstaedtler a écrit :
> * Bastien Roucaries [250413 22:09]:
> >Le dimanche 13 avril 2025, 20:55:07 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Helmut
> >
> >Grohne a écrit :
> >> Package: ruby-rmagick
> >> Version: 6.0.1-2+b4
> >> Severit
Hi Paul,
* Paul Gevers [250413 20:25]:
On 13-04-2025 11:23, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
Do you agree with the submitter of this bug that the lack of debug symbols
available via Recommends is a release critical bug? I'm not an experienced
valgrind user, but with my Release Team member hat on, thi
Hi all,
the error is apparently caused by a change in SciPy 1.15.0 in the
function scipy.spatial.distance.jaccard. Quoting the documentation at
https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy-1.15.2/reference/generated/scipy.spatial.distance.jaccard.html:
"Changed in version 1.15.0: Non-0/1 numeric input us
Hi,
The issue is caused by snakeyaml upgrade to 2.0[1] without updating
the reverse dependencies.
Best Regards,
Vladimir.
[1]
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1637734/accepted-snakeyaml-20ds-1-source-into-unstable/
Source: rust-rxml-validation
Version: 0.11.0-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: Federico Ceratto
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rust-rxml-validation
Issues preventing migration:
∙ ∙ autopkgtest for rust-rxml-validation/0.11.0-1: amd64: Regression or new
test ♻, arm64: Regression or new test ♻, a
* Bastien Roucaries [250413 22:09]:
Le dimanche 13 avril 2025, 20:55:07 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Helmut
Grohne a écrit :
Package: ruby-rmagick
Version: 6.0.1-2+b4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fileconflict
ruby-rmagick fails to coinstall despite explicitly d
Control: retitle -1 python-booleanoperations: FTBFS in testing: BooleanTests
The former title is not the cause of the FTBFS.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 1102767 +testng +snakeyaml
Bug #1102767 [src:jtreg7] jtreg7: FTBFS: Could not find org.yaml:snakeyaml:1.33.
Added indication that 1102767 affects testng and +snakeyaml
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
Source: rust-bitfields
Version: 0.12.4-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: Daniel Kahn Gillmor
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rust-bitfields
Issues preventing migration:
∙ ∙ autopkgtest for rust-bitfields/0.12.4-1: amd64: Regression or new test ♻,
arm64: Regression or new test ♻, armel: Regressio
On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 08:37:45PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 11:19:27PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> We're expecting a new upstream shim release soon; when that's uploaded
>> this will be fixed.
>
>Given this was written in January, and it's now April, and we're t
brian m. carlson (one of the git upstream copyright holders) claims
in Bug #1094969 that git cannot be distributed when linked with
OpenSSL. IIRC the Debian position is to use the system library
exception.
Indeed our /usr/lib/git-core/git-remote-https links against
libssl.so.3, probably via li
Le dimanche 13 avril 2025, 20:55:07 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Helmut
Grohne a écrit :
> Package: ruby-rmagick
> Version: 6.0.1-2+b4
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: fileconflict
>
> ruby-rmagick fails to coinstall despite explicitly declaring that
> capabilit
Processing control commands:
> close -1
Bug #1103021 [liblomiri-content-hub-glib-dev] liblomiri-content-hub-glib-dev
has an undeclared file conflict on
/usr/include/com/lomiri/content/glib/content-hub-glib.h
Marked Bug as done
> fixed -1 2.1.0-4
Bug #1103021 {Done: Mike Gabriel }
[liblomiri-con
Control: close -1
Control: fixed -1 2.1.0-4
On So 13 Apr 2025 20:23:40 CEST, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Package: liblomiri-content-hub-glib-dev
Version: 2.1.0-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fileconflict
Control: affects -1 + libcontent-hub-glib-dev
liblomiri-content-
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 python-booleanoperations: FTBFS in testing: BooleanTests
Bug #1102967 [src:python-booleanoperations] python-booleanoperations: FTBFS in
testing: KeyError: 'setuptools_scm'
Changed Bug title to 'python-booleanoperations: FTBFS in testing: BooleanTests'
fr
On 2025-04-13 at 17:29:53, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> BTW, could somebody clarify why git upstream has this ./configure
> option:
>
> --with-openssl use OpenSSL library (default is YES)
> ARG can be prefix for openssl library and headers
>
> ..., and default
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 12:15:26AM +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
> Thanks, Graham.
>
> This looked easy enough so I cherry-picked this patch, but the build
> produces a ton symbol changes.
>
> These are all C++ internal symbols that should not be public, I assume
> this is gcc-14 related.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - fixed pending
Bug #1089192 [src:golang-golang-x-net] golang-golang-x-net: FTBFS: FAIL:
TestNumICANNRules
Removed tag(s) pending and fixed.
--
1089192: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1089192
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs
Source: mingw-w64
Version: 12.0.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250413 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> check
Source: zurl
Version: 1.12.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250413 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Package: ruby-rmagick
Version: 6.0.1-2+b4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fileconflict
ruby-rmagick fails to coinstall despite explicitly declaring that
capability via Multi-Arch: same, because
/usr/share/rubygems-integration/3.3.0/specifications/rmagick-6.0.1.gemspec
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + libcontent-hub-glib-dev
Bug #1103021 [liblomiri-content-hub-glib-dev] liblomiri-content-hub-glib-dev
has an undeclared file conflict on
/usr/include/com/lomiri/content/glib/content-hub-glib.h
Added indication that 1103021 affects libcontent-hub-glib-de
Source: nfs-ganesha
Version: 6.5-3+b1
Severity: serious
Justification: may cause an unpack error from dpkg
Hi,
the use of Multi-Arch in nfs-ganesha is wrong on multiple accounts.
Multi-Arch: foreign says that the interface provided to other packages
is architecture-independent. However, nfs-gane
Package: liblomiri-content-hub-glib-dev
Version: 2.1.0-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fileconflict
Control: affects -1 + libcontent-hub-glib-dev
liblomiri-content-hub-glib-dev has an undeclared file conflict. This may
result in an unpack error from dpkg.
The file /
Package:
libgcobol-15-dev,libgcobol-15-dev-amd64-cross,libgcobol-15-dev-arc-cross,libgcobol-15-dev-arm64-cross,libgcobol-15-dev-ppc64el-cross
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fileconflict
The file /usr/share/man/man3/gcobol.3.gz is contained in the packages
* libgcobo
Your message dated Sun, 13 Apr 2025 18:19:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102734: fixed in meep-mpi-default 1.29.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102734,
regarding libmeep-mpi-default33 has an undeclared file conflict
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 11:19:27PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> We're expecting a new upstream shim release soon; when that's uploaded
> this will be fixed.
Given this was written in January, and it's now April, and we're two
days away from the soft freeze: does anyone know when "soon" will
be
Control: tags -1 - fixed pending
Hi,
the patch referenced as
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-golang-x-net/-/commit/e24c95c04f45e7db568e1a18e13c84e8b94fd43c
applies to the package in testing, but does not fix the FTBFS.
Introducing a new upstream version seems out of the question
Hi zeha,
On 13-04-2025 11:23, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
Do you agree with the submitter of this bug that the lack of debug symbols
available via Recommends is a release critical bug? I'm not an experienced
valgrind user, but with my Release Team member hat on, this looks a bit
exaggerated.
(I
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 12:19:45PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
>
[..]
> [INFO] ---
> [INFO] T E S T S
> [INFO] ---
Hi Chris,
On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 08:06:18PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 03:00:45PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Source: libfcgi
> > Version: 2.4.2-2.1
> > Severity: grave
> > Tags: security upstream
> > Forwarded: https://github.com/FastCGI-Archives/fcgi2/
Your message dated Sun, 13 Apr 2025 18:19:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796636: fixed in oss4 4.2-build2020-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #796636,
regarding oss4-base: Has init script in runlevel S but no matching service file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 12:14:19PM -0400, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> Source: qt6-webengine
> Severity: important
> User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
>
> Dear maintainer(s),
>
> Python 3.13 removes a large amount of so called 'dead battery' libraries
> from the standard library. As
Hi,
this bug (#1020299) is severity: serious and open since at least
2022.
Is this actually a bug, and if yes, is it really sev: serious?
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 12:28:03AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Control: tags -1 patch
> --
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 03:58:29PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee
On 13/04/25 at 17:30 +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Control: tags -1 unreproducible
>
> Hi Lukas,
>
> I cannot reproduce this with python3 3.13.3-1.
> Do you still see the issue?
Hi,
That version is not in testing yet according to
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python3-defaults
Lucas
On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 03:00:45PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Source: libfcgi
> Version: 2.4.2-2.1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security upstream
> Forwarded: https://github.com/FastCGI-Archives/fcgi2/issues/67
In the upstream bug there seems to be some disagreement if this is
actually a p
Your message dated Sun, 13 Apr 2025 17:35:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072601: fixed in node-mock-fs 5.5.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072601,
regarding node-mock-fs: FTBFS: failing tests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Package: git-ubuntu
Version: 1.1-2
Severity: serious
git-ubuntu fails all its autopkgtests. Accordingly britney excuses are:
Migration status for git-ubuntu (- to 1.1-2): BLOCKED: Rejected/violates
migration policy/introduces a regression
Issues preventing migration:
autopkgtest for git-ubuntu/1
Your message dated Sun, 13 Apr 2025 17:19:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1101130: fixed in mat2 0.13.5-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1101130,
regarding FTBFS: test failures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Benjamin,
On Sun, Oct 06, 2024 at 03:29:26PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> Dead upstream (last commit 2020, last release 2019). Can be safely removed
> if needed: no revdeps, popcon 15. It also B-D on python3-amqplib which is
> also very dead, broken and not in testing since 2 weeks ago (#10
BTW, could somebody clarify why git upstream has this ./configure
option:
--with-openssl use OpenSSL library (default is YES)
ARG can be prefix for openssl library and headers
..., and defaulting to YES?
It looks like git upstream -expects- to be linked to O
On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 07:22:41AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> shim still b-d's on GCC 12, which should not be part of the trixie release.
> Please update the build dependency to GCC 14 (or GCC 13, if the former
> doesn't work).
Switching out gcc-12 to gcc-14 at least works. So whenever signing
trixie release)
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To:
<174291641974.397293.3868847473724050498.reportbug@mata.proxmox.local>
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 16:26:59 +0100 =?utf-8?b?QW5kcmV3IExlZSAo5p2O5YGl56eLKQ==?=
wrote:
> Source: hime
> Followup-For: Bug #1096097
>
> control: severity -1 serious
>
> Dear maintaine
Your message dated Sun, 13 Apr 2025 19:07:25 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1064559: Forwarded upstream (+ same ftbfs in Ubuntu)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064559,
regarding pmdk: FTBFS on ppc64el: RUNTESTS: stopping:
obj_basic_integration/TEST5 failed, TEST=check FS=pmem
Your message dated Sun, 13 Apr 2025 17:05:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1090077: fixed in secrets 11.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1090077,
regarding Secrets hard-codes OpenSC's PKCS11 module wrongly (cross-arch) and
crashes trying to use it
to be marked as done.
This mea
Source: gdb-mingw-w64
Version: 13.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250413 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mkdir
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1090077 [secrets] Secrets hard-codes OpenSC's PKCS11 module wrongly
(cross-arch) and crashes trying to use it
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1090077: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1090077
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@b
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1090077 in secrets reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/secrets/-/commit/bc5b04c3b93f94c4d1a4af22dbdde
Source: skimage
Version: 0.25.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250413 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: nfs-ganesha
Version: 6.5-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250413 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: skanpage
Version: 24.12.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250413 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: ocaml
Version: 5.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250413 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: libverilog-perl
Version: 3.482-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250413 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
On 2025-04-13 at 10:23:08, Samuel Henrique wrote:
> Brian, if you think this is serious you have to bring this up to the
> ftp-master
> team.
I filed the bug on Git and I think that should be sufficient. My
position stands that this should be changed and that this is a
regression that should be
Your message dated Sun, 13 Apr 2025 16:34:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102940: fixed in freesas 2024.9.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102940,
regarding freesas: autopkgtest failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Sun, 13 Apr 2025 16:34:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102919: fixed in cthumb 4.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102919,
regarding cthumb: Global symbol "$datarootdir" requires explicit package name
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1102999
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-firmware/91d589d2c91c4c32406d27ad280a5187ca773a8c.ca...@decadent.org.uk/T/
Bug #1102999 [src:firmware-nonfree] ish firmware is undistributable
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://lore.kernel
Am Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 10:52:03AM +0200 schrieb Chris Hofstaedtler:
> Adding last Uploader to CC:.
Thanks, this was helpful. Fixed in new upload,
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
Source: firmware-nonfree
Version: 20240709-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
It seems like no-one actually read LICENCE.ish, because it says:
> 3 CONFIDENTIALITY. The terms of this Agreement and the
> Material are Intel confidential information and subject to your
> valid corporate non-disclosur
Your message dated Sun, 13 Apr 2025 17:07:43 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1102968: splash: FTBFS in testing: make[2]: ***
[Makefile:358: plotlib_giza.o] Error 1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102968,
regarding splash: FTBFS in testing: make[2]: *** [Makefile:358: plotlib_giz
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 16:31:23 +0100 =?utf-8?b?QW5kcmV3IExlZSAo5p2O5YGl56eLKQ==?=
wrote:
> Package: gcin
> Followup-For: Bug #1096098
>
> control: severity -1 serious
>
> Dear maintainer of gcin,
>
> I'm raising the severity of this ticket. We are currently in the first
> stage of the freeze for
On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 11:58:57AM +0100, Samuel Henrique wrote:
but regardless of the licensing question, it's also sad to lose GnuTLS
support for OpenLDAP.
This means it's impossible to have a GnuTLS build of libcurl with ldap support
without also pulling OpenSSL transitively.
I apologize
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 unreproducible
Bug #1102951 [src:libkate] libkate: FTBFS in testing: dh_install: error:
missing files, aborting
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
--
1102951: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1102951
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs
Control: tags -1 unreproducible
Hi Lukas,
I cannot reproduce this with python3 3.13.3-1.
Do you still see the issue?
Thanks,
Bastian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1102608 important
Bug #1102608 {Done: Bart Martens } [qiv] qiv cannot set
background anymore.
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1102608: https://bugs.
Hi Ralf,
What should be done to address this?
Why is there a mismatch between stable and unstable for libgl1-mesa-glx?
By the way, we will take the time within the next couple months to
finally work on an overdue updated release of the Ecere SDK and update
the Debian packages.
Thank you.
K
raising the severity of this bug to serious as python3-amqplib is no
longer in unstable. -Ralf
Your message dated Sun, 13 Apr 2025 15:00:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1102608: fixed in qiv 3.0.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1102608,
regarding qiv cannot set background anymore.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
merge 1100223 1101609
tags 1100223 +pending
thanks
Hi,
I have prepared an NMU based on the patch provided by Agustín that fixes
the FTBFS for hplip. Attaching here the debdiff for that NMU.
I am uploading the fix to the 2-DAY delayed queue, and will also provide
a merge request on Salsa.
-
Source: haskell-cryptol
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
haskell-cryptol build-depends on libghc-base-compat-dev (<< 0.13).
However, the version of that package in unstable and testing is
0.13.1-1.
-Ralf.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 1100223 1101609
Bug #1100223 [src:hplip] hplip: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named
'distutils'
Bug #1101609 [src:hplip] hplip: FTBFS: configure: error: cannot find
python-devel support
Merged 1100223 1101609
> tags 1100223 +pendin
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
