Hi,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 10:49:31AM +, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun 19 Jan 2025 at 02:32pm +01, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> > I just have uploaded git/1:2.47.2-0.1 to delayed/2 and posted the
> > debdiff for Jonathan.
>
> Nice.
>
> > I still prefer to hold back the bookwo
Your message dated Sat, 25 Jan 2025 07:52:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057513: fixed in kotlin 1.3.31+ds1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1057513,
regarding kotlin: FTBFS with default Java 21
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Hi!
Sorry for the long delay, I didn't have time to import new RocksDB
until yesterday and today. I have now a MR pending at
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/rocksdb/-/merge_requests/9 for
co-maintainer review and will upload to unstable hopefully soon, with
high likelihood that this fixes #1088523
Your message dated Sat, 25 Jan 2025 05:34:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1014566: fixed in massivethreads 1.02-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1014566,
regarding massivethreads: FTBFS with glibc 2.34
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Sat, 25 Jan 2025 03:34:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092543: fixed in fsspec 2024.12.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092543,
regarding fsspec: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i
python{version} -p "3.12 3.13" returned exit code 1
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1092543 in fsspec reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/fsspec/-/commit/74f08663f3b7008d19f0c
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1092543 [src:fsspec] fsspec: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test
--test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.13" returned exit code 13
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1092543: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092543
Debian Bug
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1092543 [src:fsspec] fsspec: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test
--test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.13" returned exit code 13
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1092543 to the same tags previously set
--
1092543: https://bug
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1092543 in fsspec reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/fsspec/-/commit/74f08663f3b7008d19f0c
Hi Lukas,
didn't you assign this and other related bugs to the wrong package?
osmo-bsc does not directly depend on either bctoolbox or mbedtls!? So how
could I fix this issue?
Thorsten
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + unreproducible
Bug #1094100 [src:libsgml-parser-opensp-perl] libsgml-parser-opensp-perl:
FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j8 test TEST_VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
--
1094100: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b
Control: tag -1 + unreproducible
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 21:30:26 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: libsgml-parser-opensp-perl
> Version: 0.994-7
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs
: 5.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory
> '/build/reprod
Source: nodejs
Version: 20.18.1+dfsg-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi,
The following vulnerabilities were published for nodejs.
CVE-2025-23083[0]:
| With the aid of the diagnostics_channel utilit
Source: testu01
Version: 1.2.3+ds1-2.1
Tags: sid trixie
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails since
recently. Can you please investigate the situation and fix it? I copied
some of th
Source: udptunnel
Version: 1.1-11
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package. I noticed
that it regularly fails on s390x.
Because the unstable-to-testing migration software now blocks on
reg
Hi,
Regarding this specific issue, I used a patch from Fedora to change the
default server URL from https://vagrantcloud.com to
https://vagrantcloud.com/api/v2/vagrant.
I made uploads to unstable (2.3.7+git20230731.5fc64cde+dfsg-3) and
stable(-proposed-updates) (2.3.4+dfsg-1+deb12u1).
Note that
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #807392 [src:libsendmail-milter-perl] libsendmail-milter-perl: intermittent
FTBFSes: Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
807392: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807392
Debian Bug
Source: ctioga2
Version: 0.14.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Your message dated Fri, 24 Jan 2025 21:52:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1093941: fixed in sonic-pi 3.2.2~repack-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #1093941,
regarding sonic-pi: FTBFS: uninitialized constant SonicPi::MiniTest (NameError)
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Source: osmo-msc
Version: 1.12.0+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: csound
Version: 1:6.18.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package because it
showed up on the excuses list of glibc. I noticed that it regularly
fails on s390x.
Because the
Your message dated Fri, 24 Jan 2025 21:38:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092987: fixed in vagrant 2.3.7+git20230731.5fc64cde+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092987,
regarding vagrant: free Vagrant versions no longer work with HashiCorp Cloud
Platform's Vagrant registry
t
Your message dated Fri, 24 Jan 2025 21:38:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091664: fixed in vagrant 2.3.7+git20230731.5fc64cde+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091664,
regarding vagrant: FTBFS with ruby3.3: "requires Ruby version >= 3.0, < 3.3."
to be marked as done.
This m
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1092987 in vagrant reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/vagrant/-/commit/0ec33dec7fd8f2e3fa501578d54b4f
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1091664 in vagrant reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/vagrant/-/commit/6ed666da3aa40b3c83df27c549a17a
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1091664 [src:vagrant] vagrant: FTBFS with ruby3.3: "requires Ruby version
>= 3.0, < 3.3."
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1091664: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091664
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1092987 [vagrant] vagrant: free Vagrant versions no longer work with
HashiCorp Cloud Platform's Vagrant registry
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1092987: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092987
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow..
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1093953 important
Bug #1093953 [src:linux] linux-image-6.12.9-amd64: i915 causes lockups and
kernel panics with crocus on ThinkPad X201
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Source: django-iconify
Version: 0.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: nanoc
Version: 4.13.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Failure/Error: exp
Source: fcitx5-m17n
Version: 5.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enter
Source: pdsh
Version: 2.34-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[6]: Entering direct
Source: git-reintegrate
Version: 0.4-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Hi Lucas,
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 09:30:52PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: phosh-mobile-settings
> Version: 0.44.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
This is caused
Source: rsyslog
Version: 8.2412.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Enter
Source: netsed
Version: 1.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: osmo-sgsn
Version: 1.12.0+dfsg1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: linphone
Version: 5.2.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: linphone-desktop
Version: 5.0.2-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: sight
Version: 24.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: msopenh264
Version: 5.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1094038 [src:graide] graide: FTBFS: ImportError: Failed to import test
module: graide.testlist
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1094038: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1094038
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1094038 in graide reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/graide/-/commit/d34a45b617331683b3c8d
On 1/24/25 1:33 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 06:40:51PM +, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On 1/24/25 16:30, Xan Charbonnet wrote:
>>> On 1/24/25 04:33, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
Thanks for narrowing it down. Xan, can you try this change please?
Waiter
Source: libosmo-netif
Version: 1.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: thin-provisioning-tools
Version: 1.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: density-fitness
Version: 1.0.12-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bi
Source: ruby-webpacker
Version: 5.4.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ruby
Source: python-qtawesome
Version: 1.3.1+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: ruby-jaeger-client
Version: 1.3.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: vagrant-mutate
Version: 1.2.0-4.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: phosh-mobile-settings
Version: 0.44.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: python-easydev
Version: 0.13.2+dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: pytrainer
Version: 2.2.1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: todoist-api-python
Version: 2.1.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: awesomeversion
Version: 24.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: mrc
Version: 1.3.14-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
&
Processing control commands:
> forcemerge #1092890 -1
Bug #1092890 [libglx-mesa0] mesa: regression in 24.3: software rendering
crashes on ppc64el with segmentation fault
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #1094023 is 'lomiri-system-settings' not 'libglx-mesa0'
Failed to forcibly merge 10928
Source: fonts-fork-awesome
Version: 1.2.0+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: lime
Version: 5.2.0+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: pystray
Version: 0.19.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules clean
&
Source: django-graphiql-debug-toolbar
Version: 0.2.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Hi Pavel,
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 06:40:51PM +, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 1/24/25 16:30, Xan Charbonnet wrote:
> > On 1/24/25 04:33, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> > > Thanks for narrowing it down. Xan, can you try this change please?
> > > Waiters can miss wake ups without it, seems to match the de
Source: coinor-symphony
Version: 5.6.17+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: libmodbus
Version: 3.1.11-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: belle-sip
Version: 5.2.0+dfsg-3.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-tld
Version: 0.13-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: vagrant-librarian-puppet
Version: 0.9.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ngspetsc
Version: 0.0.8-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: vagrant-libvirt
Version: 0.12.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: dqlite
Version: 1.18.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This looks similar to #1069400 but this one is
Source: ruby-mongo
Version: 2.5.1-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules cl
Source: python-construct-classes
Version: 0.1.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: vagrant-cachier
Version: 1.2.1-3.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ruby-childprocess
Version: 4.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cannot l
Source: wordnet
Version: 1:3.0-38
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: ruby-fog-rackspace
Version: 0.1.6-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: xdotool
Version: 1:3.20160805.1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: rust-glycin-utils
Version: 3.0.0~alpha.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: liquidctl
Version: 1.14.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: belr
Version: 5.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: vagrant-sshfs
Version: 1.3.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: bcmatroska2
Version: 5.2.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-apt
Version: 2.9.6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: giza
Version: 1.4.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[6]: Entering direct
Source: libsgml-parser-opensp-perl
Version: 0.994-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: python-django-guid
Version: 3.4.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: gdb-mingw-w64
Version: 13.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: ruby-shoulda-context
Version: 2.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: transgui
Version: 5.18.0+dfsg-3.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: hippotat
Version: 1.1.12
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: bzrtp
Version: 5.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-fonticon-fontawesome6
Version: 6.4.0+ds1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: mediastreamer2
Version: 1:5.2.0+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: tj3
Version: 3.7.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: python-colormap
Version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: xphyle
Version: 4.4.4-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
&
Source: osmo-hlr
Version: 1.8.0+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: csaps
Version: 1.2.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250124 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo