Bug#1091505: ruby3.3: will FTBFS during trixie support period

2025-01-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 20:02:40 +0100 Santiago Vila wrote: > Is it also RC if it connects to the internet but has no affect if the > connection fails? See policy 4.9 https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules """ Except for packages in the non

Bug#1092737: zutils: may delete gzip files when installed on bookworm (DEP17)

2025-01-10 Thread Helmut Grohne
Package: zutils Version: 1.14~rc1-2 Severity: serious Justification: deletes gzip's files Tags: patch User: helm...@debian.org Usertags: dep17 Hi, I noticed that my understanding of dpkg-divert's --rename flag was wrong when I wrote the DEP17 patch for zutils. Details at https://lists.debian.org/

Bug#1084614: mesa: removal of Python standard libraries in Python 3.13

2025-01-10 Thread Stuart Prescott
The use of the old python telnetlib appears to be only in upstream CI and so does not affect the Debian package. I think this bug can just be closed - if no-one disagrees with me on that I'll do so in a couple of days to clean it off the Python 3.13 todo list. If it turns out that these scri

Bug#1092736: src:pv: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on arm64

2025-01-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: pv Version: 1.9.7-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.9.25-1 Tags: sid trixie ftbfs User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as h

Processed: src:pv: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on arm64

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 1.9.25-1 Bug #1092736 [src:pv] src:pv: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on arm64 Marked as fixed in versions pv/1.9.25-1. Bug #1092736 [src:pv] src:pv: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on arm64 Marked Bug as done -- 1092736:

Processed: limit source to kdevelop-python, tagging 1092063

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit source kdevelop-python Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'kdevelop-python' Limit currently set to 'source':'kdevelop-python' > tags 1092063 + pending Bug #1092063 [src:kdevelop-python] kdevelop-python ftbfs wi

Bug#1092706: kodi: FTBFS: missing initializer for member ‘_typeobject::tp_versions_used’

2025-01-10 Thread Vasyl Gello
Hi Boyuan! The bug you mention is the same that was expected to be closed in 2:21.1+dfsg-7 (in salsa repo). However, my GPG keys got expired and I did not manage to update them before December 20th, so I am locked out of direct uploads to unstable till the next keyring update (January 22nd as m

Bug#1092685: marked as done (cantata: FTBFS with taglib 2.0)

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jan 2025 05:49:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1092685: fixed in cantata 2.5.0.ds1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1092685, regarding cantata: FTBFS with taglib 2.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#1082098: marked as done (pynfft FTBFS with Python 3.13)

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jan 2025 05:27:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1082098: fixed in pynfft 1.3.2-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #1082098, regarding pynfft FTBFS with Python 3.13 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#1077919: marked as done (pynfft: binary-all FTBFS)

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jan 2025 15:45:27 +1100 with message-id <8a0c7a9c-3576-4656-adc3-d3c65fbd8...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1077919: pynfft: binary-all FTBFS has caused the Debian Bug report #1077919, regarding pynfft: binary-all FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you cl

Bug#1092637: marked as done (please update to v1.2.0)

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jan 2025 03:27:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1092637: fixed in rust-critical-section 1.2.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1092637, regarding please update to v1.2.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Processed: tagging 1089756

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1089756 + confirmed Bug #1089756 [angelfish] qrc:/PrintPreview.qml:11:1: module "org.kde.kirigamiaddons.labs.mobileform" is not installed Added tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -

Processed: Bumping taglib 2.x FTBFS bugs to serious, update of Build-dep package name recommended

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1092708 [src:ncmpcpp] ncmpcpp: FTBFS with taglib 2.0 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 1092708: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092708 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bumping taglib 2.x FTBFS bugs to serious, update of Build-dep package name recommended

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1092707 [src:mixxx] mixxx: FTBFS with taglib 2.0: test failed Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 1092707: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092707 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pro

Processed: Bumping taglib 2.x FTBFS bugs to serious, update of Build-dep package name recommended

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1092704 [src:easytag] easytag: FTBFS with taglib 2.0 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 1092704: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092704 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bumping taglib 2.x FTBFS bugs to serious, update of Build-dep package name recommended

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1092686 [src:clementine] clementine: FTBFS with taglib 2.0 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 1092686: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092686 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with proble

Processed: Bumping taglib 2.x FTBFS bugs to serious, update of Build-dep package name recommended

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1092687 [src:glasscoder] glasscoder: FTBFS with taglib 2.0 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 1092687: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092687 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with proble

Processed: Bumping taglib 2.x FTBFS bugs to serious, update of Build-dep package name recommended

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1092685 [src:cantata] cantata: FTBFS with taglib 2.0 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 1092685: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092685 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bumping taglib 2.x FTBFS bugs to serious, update of Build-dep package name recommended

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1092688 [src:ocaml-taglib] ocaml-taglib: FTBFS with taglib 2.0 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 1092688: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092688 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr

Processed: Bumping taglib 2.x FTBFS bugs to serious, update of Build-dep package name recommended

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1092683 [src:lomiri-thumbnailer] lomiri-thumbnailer: FTBFS with taglib 2.0 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 1092683: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092683 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian

Processed: Bumping taglib 2.x FTBFS bugs to serious, update of Build-dep package name recommended

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1092684 [src:mediascanner2] mediascanner2: FTBFS with taglib 2.0 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 1092684: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092684 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Processed: Bumping taglib 2.x FTBFS bugs to serious, update of Build-dep package name recommended

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1092681 [src:deepin-music] deepin-music: FTBFS with taglib 2.0 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 1092681: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092681 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr

Bug#1090773: marked as done (o2: uses removed --with buildinfo)

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jan 2025 00:06:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1090773: fixed in o2 1.1~ds-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1090773, regarding o2: uses removed --with buildinfo to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Processed: closing 1075480

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1075480 0.6.1-4 Bug #1075480 [src:ruby-uconv] ruby-uconv: ftbfs with GCC-14 Marked as fixed in versions ruby-uconv/0.6.1-4. Bug #1075480 [src:ruby-uconv] ruby-uconv: ftbfs with GCC-14 Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Pl

Bug#1090773: marked as pending in o2

2025-01-10 Thread IOhannes zmölnig
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1090773 in o2 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/o2/-/commit/c2f9dd33e98e8b4e1273328ab77b452c40

Processed: Bug#1090773 marked as pending in o2

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1090773 [src:o2] o2: uses removed --with buildinfo Added tag(s) pending. -- 1090773: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1090773 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1091945: org-roam: FTBFS: error: (void-function emacsql-sqlite)

2025-01-10 Thread Xiyue Deng
Hi Ayermic, Sean, Sean Whitton writes: > Hello, > > On Fri 10 Jan 2025 at 02:13pm +01, Aymeric Agon-Rambosson wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Le jeudi 9 janvier 2025 à 02:06, Xiyue Deng a écrit : >> >>> It looks like the cause is that the current latest release of org-roam >>> was too old (released in 20

Bug#1091505: ruby3.3: diff for NMU version 3.3.6-1.1

2025-01-10 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Dear maintainer, I've prepared an updated NMU for ruby3.3 (versioned as 3.3.6-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. Sebastian diff -Nru ruby3.3-3.3.6/debian/changelog ruby3.3-3.3.6/debian/changelog --- ruby3.3-3.3.6/debian/changelog 2

Bug#1091380: marked as done (samhain: FTBFS on s390x)

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jan 2025 21:55:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1091380: fixed in samhain 4.1.4-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1091380, regarding samhain: FTBFS on s390x to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Processed: closing 1092428

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1092428 4.0.0+dfsg-3 Bug #1092428 [src:tailspin] tailspin: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: librust-terminal-size-0.3+default-dev Marked as fixed in versions tailspin/4.0.0+dfsg-3. Bug #1092428 [src:tailspin] tailspin: FTBFS: build-

Bug#1081528: marked as done (krdp: Stop using freerdp2)

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jan 2025 21:23:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1081528: fixed in krdp 6.2.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1081528, regarding krdp: Stop using freerdp2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#1092010: closing 1092010

2025-01-10 Thread David Prévot
close 1092010 3.8.1-1 thanks

Processed: closing 1092010

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1092010 3.8.1-1 Bug #1092010 [php-monolog] php-monolog: Build-Depends on libphp-swiftmailer, which is intended for removal Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1092010 to the same values previously set Bug #1092010 [php-monolog

Bug#1091035: marked as done (python-urllib3: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p "3.13 3.12" returned exit code 13)

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jan 2025 21:47:21 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1091035: python-urllib3: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p "3.13 3.12" returned exit code 13 has caused the Debian Bug report #1091035, regarding python-urllib3: FTBFS: dh_au

Processed: src:rebar3: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 3.23.0-3 Bug #1092716 [src:rebar3] src:rebar3: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked as fixed in versions rebar3/3.23.0-3. Bug #1092716 [src:rebar3] src:rebar3: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked Bug as done -- 1092716: https://bugs.

Bug#1092719: src:mame: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel and mips64el

2025-01-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: mame Version: 0.270+dfsg.1-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 0.273+dfsg.1-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30

Processed: src:mame: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel and mips64el

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 0.273+dfsg.1-1 Bug #1092719 [src:mame] src:mame: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel and mips64el Marked as fixed in versions mame/0.273+dfsg.1-1. Bug #1092719 [src:mame] src:mame: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on arm

Processed: src:c-blosc2: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips64el

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 2.15.2+ds-5 Bug #1092718 [src:c-blosc2] src:c-blosc2: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips64el Marked as fixed in versions c-blosc2/2.15.2+ds-5. Bug #1092718 [src:c-blosc2] src:c-blosc2: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on

Processed: src:rebar: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 2.6.4-5 Bug #1092717 [src:rebar] src:rebar: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked as fixed in versions rebar/2.6.4-5. Bug #1092717 [src:rebar] src:rebar: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked Bug as done -- 1092717: https://bugs.debian.

Bug#1092718: src:c-blosc2: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips64el

2025-01-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: c-blosc2 Version: 2.15.1+ds-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 2.15.2+ds-5 Tags: sid trixie ftbfs User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than

Bug#1092717: src:rebar: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-01-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: rebar Version: 2.6.4-4 Severity: serious Control: close -1 2.6.4-5 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as havin

Bug#1092716: src:rebar3: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-01-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: rebar3 Version: 3.19.0-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 3.23.0-3 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as ha

Processed: src:rust-oxhttp: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 0.2.7-1 Bug #1092715 [src:rust-oxhttp] src:rust-oxhttp: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked as fixed in versions rust-oxhttp/0.2.7-1. Bug #1092715 [src:rust-oxhttp] src:rust-oxhttp: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked Bug as done -

Bug#1092715: src:rust-oxhttp: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-01-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: rust-oxhttp Version: 0.2.3-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 0.2.7-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as

Bug#1092714: src:rust-easy-ext: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-01-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: rust-easy-ext Version: 1.0.1-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.0.2-1 Tags: sid trixie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days

Processed: src:rust-easy-ext: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 1.0.2-1 Bug #1092714 [src:rust-easy-ext] src:rust-easy-ext: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked as fixed in versions rust-easy-ext/1.0.2-1. Bug #1092714 [src:rust-easy-ext] src:rust-easy-ext: fails to migrate to testing for too long Marked Bug

Processed: Re: Bug#1091575: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1091575: probabel: FTBFS on i386: dh_auto_test: error: make -j8 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j8 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1091575 [src:probabel] probabel: FTBFS on i386: dh_auto_test: error: make -j8 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j8 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2 Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious' -- 1091575: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep

Bug#1091575: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1091575: probabel: FTBFS on i386: dh_auto_test: error: make -j8 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j8 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2025-01-10 Thread Étienne Mollier
Control: severity -1 wishlist Hi, Étienne Mollier, on 2025-01-06: > I filed the removal request under Debian bug > #1092275 so that we stop providing this package for i386. I reduce the bug severity to "wishlist" item, now that the package is out of i386. I'm still pondering whether to close th

Processed: bug 1092440 is forwarded to https://github.com/grisha/mod_python/issues/143, tagging 1092440

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 1092440 https://github.com/grisha/mod_python/issues/143 Bug #1092440 [src:libapache2-mod-python] FTBFS with Python 3.13: error: implicit declaration of function '_PyImport_FixupExtensionObject' Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://

Bug#1091568: libmaus2: FTBFS on i386: ld: ./.libs/libmaus2.so: undefined reference to `libmaus2::posix::PosixFunctions::fstatSizeAndMode(int, long long&, unsigned char*)'

2025-01-10 Thread Étienne Mollier
Control: severity -1 normal Hi, I reduce the severity now that libmaus2 and biobambam2 have been removed from the i386 port. Have a nice day, :) -- .''`. Étienne Mollier : :' : pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosi

Processed: Re: Bug#1091568: libmaus2: FTBFS on i386: ld: ./.libs/libmaus2.so: undefined reference to `libmaus2::posix::PosixFunctions::fstatSizeAndMode(int, long long&, unsigned char*)'

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 normal Bug #1091568 [src:libmaus2] libmaus2: FTBFS on i386: ld: ./.libs/libmaus2.so: undefined reference to `libmaus2::posix::PosixFunctions::fstatSizeAndMode(int, long long&, unsigned char*)' Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' -- 1091568: https:

Processed: forcibly merging 1092360 1092476

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 1092360 1092476 Bug #1092360 [src:python-demgengeo] python-demgengeo FTBFS: 'gettimeofday' was not declared in this scope Bug #1092360 [src:python-demgengeo] python-demgengeo FTBFS: 'gettimeofday' was not declared in this scope Added

Bug#1079523: marked as done (firebird4.0 FTBFS with autoconf 2.72)

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jan 2025 21:47:04 +0200 with message-id <20250110194704.3yroqoqfnggx3gqi@fbd7c150-3361-11e8-8c11-5badabdd4a8d> and subject line ftbfs with autoconf 2.72 fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #1079523, regarding firebird4.0 FTBFS with autoconf 2.72 to be marked as done.

Bug#1091303:

2025-01-10 Thread Andreas Hasenack
There is this upstream bug where some discussion is happening, and there are concerns about the changes in existing data structures. https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/-/issues/832

Processed: update bug relationship

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1082165 libcangjie/1.4.0.really.1.4.0-4 Bug #1082165 {Done: Boyuan Yang } [libcangjie3-data] libcangjie3-data: Missing Breaks+Replaces: libcangjie2-data Marked as fixed in versions libcangjie/1.4.0.really.1.4.0-4. > thanks Stopping processi

Bug#1092045: marked as done (yuzu: FTBFS: Could NOT find MbedTLS: (Required is at least version "2.16"))

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jan 2025 19:22:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1092045: fixed in yuzu 0-1335+ds-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1092045, regarding yuzu: FTBFS: Could NOT find MbedTLS: (Required is at least version "2.16") to be marked as done. This means that you cla

Bug#1091505: ruby3.3: will FTBFS during trixie support period

2025-01-10 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2025-01-10 20:12:01 [+0100], Santiago Vila wrote: > Hi. Hi, > Note that for the purposes of fixing the bug it would be enough > if you refactor the test to assume that the internet connection > would never succeed, i.e. you can save the connection > altogether and do as if it always failed. If

Bug#1091505: ruby3.3: will FTBFS during trixie support period

2025-01-10 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2025-01-10 18:49:44 [+0100], Santiago Vila wrote: > You are absolutely right. This is not a "will fail to build in the future" > type of bug but a "tries to access Internet during build" bug. > > Such bugs are already RC, and have been for a long time, so I'm adjusting > the metadata accordingl

Bug#1091505: ruby3.3: will FTBFS during trixie support period

2025-01-10 Thread Santiago Vila
Hi. Note that for the purposes of fixing the bug it would be enough if you refactor the test to assume that the internet connection would never succeed, i.e. you can save the connection altogether and do as if it always failed. If this results in a test which does nothing, then you could just ski

Bug#1091505: ruby3.3: will FTBFS during trixie support period

2025-01-10 Thread Santiago Vila
El 10/1/25 a las 19:57, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior escribió: On 2025-01-10 18:49:44 [+0100], Santiago Vila wrote: You are absolutely right. This is not a "will fail to build in the future" type of bug but a "tries to access Internet during build" bug. Such bugs are already RC, and have been for

Bug#1088044: Ping

2025-01-10 Thread Jeremy Sowden
Polite ping. :) J. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1092045: marked as pending in yuzu

2025-01-10 Thread Andrea Pappacoda
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1092045 in yuzu reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/yuzu/-/commit/9ef8d47ce48893f566460553a49064a8bf24618

Processed: Bug#1092045 marked as pending in yuzu

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1092045 [src:yuzu] yuzu: FTBFS: Could NOT find MbedTLS: (Required is at least version "2.16") Added tag(s) pending. -- 1092045: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092045 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w

Bug#1091380: samhain: FTBFS on s390x

2025-01-10 Thread Sven Geuer
Hi Berli, On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:27:05 +0100 Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 10:48:09AM +, Berli Gayathri wrote: > > Could you please check and let us know? > > I'm sorry, I cannot spend more of my free time on s390x. I hope the > s390x porters or the maintainer can spend

Bug#1092703: ruby-roo: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: expect(subject.instance_variables).to_not include(:@memoized_data)

2025-01-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-roo Version: 2.10.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.3 Hi, The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-roo failed to build. Relevant part (hopefully): > Failure/Err

Bug#1092702: ruby-rgfa: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Error: test_field_writer_H(TestRGFAFieldWriter): NoMethodError: undefined method `trust' for an instance of RGFA::ByteArray

2025-01-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-rgfa Version: 1.3.1+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.3 Hi, The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-rgfa failed to build. Relevant part (hopefully): > Error: tes

Bug#1092701: ruby-rails-assets-underscore: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed.

2025-01-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-rails-assets-underscore Version: 1.8.3+dfsg-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.3 Hi, The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-rails-assets-underscore failed to build. R

Bug#1092697: ruby-nokogumbo: FTBFS with ruby3.3: nokogumbo.c:492:27: error: ‘rb_cData’ undeclared (first use in this function)

2025-01-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-nokogumbo Version: 2.0.5-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.3 Hi, The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-nokogumbo failed to build. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc -

Bug#1092700: ruby-rails-assets-markdown-it-diaspora-mention: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed.

2025-01-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-rails-assets-markdown-it-diaspora-mention Version: 1.2.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.3 Hi, The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-rails-assets-markdown-it-diasp

Bug#1092699: ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: require 'puppet-syntax/tasks/puppet-syntax'

2025-01-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper Version: 7.0.5-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.3 Hi, The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper failed to build. Relevant

Bug#1092698: ruby-puppet-syntax: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1477:in `rescue in block in activate_dependencies': Could not fin

2025-01-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-puppet-syntax Version: 4.1.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.3 Hi, The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-puppet-syntax failed to build. Relevant part (hopefully):

Bug#1092696: ruby-grib: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: @dims.each{|dim,len| expect(dim.typecode).to be_instance_of Fixnum}

2025-01-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-grib Version: 0.4.0-6 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.3 Hi, The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-grib failed to build. Relevant part (hopefully): > Failure/Er

Bug#1092691: ruby-cleanroom: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error:

2025-01-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-cleanroom Version: 1.0.0-1.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.3 Hi, The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-cleanroom was found to fail to build in that situation. Rel

Bug#1092695: ruby-gitlab-flowdock-git-hook: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: :86:in `require': cannot load such

2025-01-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-gitlab-flowdock-git-hook Version: 1.0.1-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.3 Hi, The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-gitlab-flowdock-git-hook failed to build. Rele

Bug#1092692: ruby-dataobjects-sqlite3: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: conn = DataObjects::Connection.new(CONFIG.uri)

2025-01-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-dataobjects-sqlite3 Version: 0.10.17-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.3 Hi, The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-dataobjects-sqlite3 was found to fail to build. R

Bug#1092694: ruby-dataobjects: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: 35.2) Failure/Error: raise ArgumentError.new("+max_size+ should be a Fixnum but was #{max_size.inspect}") unless

2025-01-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-dataobjects Version: 0.10.17-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.3 Hi, The ruby3.3 transition has started on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-dataobjects failed to build. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1090217: marked as done (erlang: FTBFS: make[4]: *** [/<>/make/doc.mk:76: html/index.html] Error 1)

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jan 2025 18:07:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1090217: fixed in erlang 1:27.2+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1090217, regarding erlang: FTBFS: make[4]: *** [/<>/make/doc.mk:76: html/index.html] Error 1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1092690: ruby-api-pagination: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: expect(response.header['Per-Page']).to eq('6')

2025-01-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-api-pagination Version: 4.8.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.3 Hi, The ruby3.3 has started on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-api-pagination was found to fail to build in that situation. Releva

Processed: Re: Bug#1091505: ruby3.3: will FTBFS during trixie support period

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1091505 ruby3.3: Tries to access Internet during build Bug #1091505 [src:ruby3.3] ruby3.3: will FTBFS during trixie support period Changed Bug title to 'ruby3.3: Tries to access Internet during build' from 'ruby3.3: will FTBFS during trix

Bug#1092524: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1092524: ariba: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.13" returned exit code 13

2025-01-10 Thread s3v
Hi! On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 22:02:10 +0100 =?utf-8?Q?=C3=89tienne?= Mollier wrote: > This: > > > > WARNING: I tried to get the version of spades with: "/usr/bin/spades.py > > > --version" and the output didn't match this regular expression: > > > "SPAdes.*v([0-9\.]+)" > > > ARIBA version: local > >

Bug#1090211: marked as done (elixir-ex-doc: FTBFS: Mix requires the Hex package manager to fetch dependencies)

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jan 2025 17:34:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1090211: fixed in elixir-ex-doc 0.35.1+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1090211, regarding elixir-ex-doc: FTBFS: Mix requires the Hex package manager to fetch dependencies to be marked as done. This m

Bug#1091241: pistache: FTBFS on armhf: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-arm-linux-gnueabihf && DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_LAYOUT=deb LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 MESON_TESTTHREADS=4 meson test --no-suite=network returned exit c

2025-01-10 Thread Andrea Pappacoda
Hi, On Fri Jan 10, 2025 at 4:10 PM CET, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi Andreas, It's Andrea, without the s ;) I retried it, and confirm that it is now fixed Nice to hear, thanks! Bye. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Processed: closing 1090215

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1090215 1.2.1-2 Bug #1090215 [src:elixir-makeup] elixir-makeup: FTBFS: error: module NimbleParsec is not loaded and could not be found. Marked as fixed in versions elixir-makeup/1.2.1-2. Bug #1090215 [src:elixir-makeup] elixir-makeup: FTBFS

Bug#1090215: closing 1090215

2025-01-10 Thread Sergei Golovan
close 1090215 1.2.1-2 thanks Forgot to add (closes: #1090215) in the changelog of 1.2.1-2.

Bug#1091657: the ruby3.3 transition has started

2025-01-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hello, As we are starting the ruby3.3 transition, these bugs are now release critical and having their priorities bumped to serious. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Processed: Re: Bug#1092607: dracut: upstream-dracut-network-nfs autopkgtest fails on amd64

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:linux Bug #1092607 [src:dracut] dracut: upstream-dracut-network-nfs autopkgtest fails on amd64 Bug reassigned from package 'src:dracut' to 'src:linux'. No longer marked as found in versions dracut/105-3. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bu

Bug#1092607: dracut: upstream-dracut-network-nfs autopkgtest fails on amd64

2025-01-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
Control: reassign -1 src:linux Control: forcemerge 1087900 -1 Control: affects -1 src:dracut On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 06:17:44PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > Source: dracut > Version: 105-3 > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: flaky > Severity: grave > Justification: blocks other package

Processed: severity of 1091657 is serious, severity of 1091659 is serious, severity of 1091660 is serious ...

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1091657 serious Bug #1091657 [src:ruby-chef-config] ruby-chef-config: FTBFS with ruby3.3: ERROR: Test "ruby3.3" failed: Failure/Error: allow(File).to receive(:exists?).with(ChefConfig::Config.var_chef_dir).and_return(true) Severity

Bug#1090214: marked as done (elixir-makeup-erlang: FTBFS: Mix requires the Hex package manager to fetch dependencies)

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jan 2025 17:06:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1090214: fixed in elixir-makeup-erlang 1.0.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1090214, regarding elixir-makeup-erlang: FTBFS: Mix requires the Hex package manager to fetch dependencies to be marked as done.

Bug#1090213: marked as done (elixir-makeup-elixir: FTBFS: error: module NimbleParsec is not loaded and could not be found.)

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jan 2025 17:05:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1090213: fixed in elixir-makeup-elixir 1.0.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1090213, regarding elixir-makeup-elixir: FTBFS: error: module NimbleParsec is not loaded and could not be found. to be marked as

Bug#1090212: marked as done (elixir-makeup-c: FTBFS: Mix requires the Hex package manager to fetch dependencies)

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jan 2025 17:05:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1090212: fixed in elixir-makeup-c 0.1.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1090212, regarding elixir-makeup-c: FTBFS: Mix requires the Hex package manager to fetch dependencies to be marked as done. This mea

Bug#1087954: ruby3.3: diff for NMU version 3.3.6-1.1

2025-01-10 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Control: tags 1087954 + patch Control: tags 1087954 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ruby3.3 (versioned as 3.3.6-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. Sebastian diff -Nru ruby3.3-3.3.6/debian/changelog ruby3.3-3.3.

Processed: ruby3.3: diff for NMU version 3.3.6-1.1

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 1087954 + patch Bug #1087954 [ruby3.3] ruby3.3: Fix FTBFS against openssl 3.4 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1087954 to the same tags previously set > tags 1087954 + pending Bug #1087954 [ruby3.3] ruby3.3: Fix FTBFS against openssl 3.4 Added tag(s) pendi

Bug#1092673: nvidia-cuda-toolkit-gcc: depends on g++-12

2025-01-10 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Package: nvidia-cuda-toolkit-gcc Version: 12.2.1-2 Severity: serious Hi, nvidia-cuda-toolkit-gcc depends on g++-12, which is likely not going to be a part of trixie. Please update to g++-13 or preferably g++-14. Cheers, Emilio

Bug#1092598: marked as done (libzfs6linux ineffectively replaces libzfs4linux (DEP17 P1))

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jan 2025 16:37:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1092598: fixed in zfs-linux 2.3.0~rc5-1~exp1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1092598, regarding libzfs6linux ineffectively replaces libzfs4linux (DEP17 P1) to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#1090209: marked as done (elixir-earmark-parser: FTBFS: Mix requires the Hex package manager to fetch dependencies)

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jan 2025 16:34:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1090209: fixed in elixir-earmark-parser 1.4.42-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1090209, regarding elixir-earmark-parser: FTBFS: Mix requires the Hex package manager to fetch dependencies to be marked as do

Processed: Correction

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1092577 minor Bug #1092577 [src:erlang-hex] erlang-hex: Build with newer Elixir and Erlang Severity set to 'minor' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1092577: https://bugs.debian

Bug#1092577: Correction

2025-01-10 Thread Sergei Golovan
severity 1092577 minor thanks Hi John, I'm sorry, I was too quick with this bugreport. As long as it'd be good to rebuild the package, it still works as it is, so there's no immediate rush on that. Cheers! -- Sergei Golovan

Bug#1092408: marked as done (trackballs: FTBFS: SDL_ttf.h:165:16: error: using typedef-name ‘TTF_Font’ after ‘struct’)

2025-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jan 2025 16:02:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1092408: fixed in trackballs 1.3.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1092408, regarding trackballs: FTBFS: SDL_ttf.h:165:16: error: using typedef-name ‘TTF_Font’ after ‘struct’ to be marked as done. This me

Bug#1092598: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] Bug#1092598: libzfs6linux ineffectively replaces libzfs4linux (DEP17 P1)

2025-01-10 Thread Shengqi Chen
Hi Helmut, Also thank you for you fast patch! > 2025年1月10日 18:54,Helmut Grohne 写道: > > As such, this poses a noticable maintenance cost down the road, but in > the interest of not rendering people's machines unbootable, I recommend > going this path. Please find a patch attached. Maybe a newbi

  1   2   >