user ni...@thykier.net
usertags 1092384 rrr-no-as-default-issue
thanks
On Tue, 07 Jan 2025 13:08:28 -0700 Sam Hartman wrote:
> "Lucas" == Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> install: cannot change ownership of
> 'debian/krb5-admin-server/usr/sbin/krb5_newrealm': Operation not permitted
It looks lik
On 1/7/25 20:41, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: python-eventlet
Version: 0.36.1-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
-- Docs: https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/how-to/capture-warnings.html
==
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1092379 in python-eventlet reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/third-party/python-eventlet/-/comm
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1092379 [src:python-eventlet] python-eventlet: FTBFS: tests fail
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1092379: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092379
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Wed, 8 Jan 2025 08:19:21 +0100
with message-id <9bbd7417-fd15-4c2d-b201-1606482ce...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: debdelta: Supporting rootless builds by default
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089311,
regarding debdelta: Supporting rootless builds by default
to be marked
Source: breezy
Version: 3.3.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=breezy&arch=amd64&ver=3.3.9-1%2Bb2&stamp=1736258298&raw=0
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/build/reproducible-
path/breezy-3.3.9/breezy/tests/test_symbol_versioning.py", line 10
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2025 06:23:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1089413: fixed in physlock 13-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089413,
regarding physlock: Supporting rootless builds by default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2025 06:23:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1089412: fixed in phpwebcounter 1.0-5.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089412,
regarding phpwebcounter: Supporting rootless builds by default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2025 05:19:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1089295: fixed in blosxom 2.1.2-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089295,
regarding blosxom: Supporting rootless builds by default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2025 05:20:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1089423: fixed in rungetty 1.2-16.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089423,
regarding rungetty: Supporting rootless builds by default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Repair / workaround: after every use of xen-create-image, do
the following:
apt install --reinstall tzdata
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2025 04:49:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1089287: fixed in auto-07p 0.9.2+dfsg-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089287,
regarding auto-07p: Supporting rootless builds by default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2025 04:50:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092312: fixed in digikam 4:8.5.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092312,
regarding digikam: FTBFS in unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2025 04:19:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1089314: fixed in dist 1:3.5-236-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089314,
regarding dist: Supporting rootless builds by default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2025 04:10:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1089464: fixed in wide-dhcpv6 20080615-23.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089464,
regarding wide-dhcpv6: Supporting rootless builds by default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2025 04:10:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091652: fixed in openjade 1.4devel1-23.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091652,
regarding openjade: Supporting rootless builds by default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2025 03:26:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092393: fixed in rust-ripasso-cursive 0.6.5-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092393,
regarding rust-ripasso-cursive: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable:
librust-terminal-size-0.3+default-dev
to be ma
Package: xen-tools
Version: 4.9.2-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
X-Debbugs-Cc: ke...@mit.edu
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Creating a new image.
* What exactly d
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2025 01:58:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092405: fixed in rust-rebuilderd-worker 0.21.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092405,
regarding rust-rebuilderd-worker: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable:
librust-env-logger-0.10+default-dev
to be
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2025 01:57:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092409: fixed in rust-lsd 1.1.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092409,
regarding rust-lsd: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable:
librust-terminal-size-0.3+default-dev
to be marked as done.
This mean
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2025 01:10:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092421: fixed in rust-du-dust 1.1.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092421,
regarding rust-du-dust: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable:
librust-terminal-size-0.3+default-dev
to be marked as done.
T
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2025 01:13:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092378: fixed in rust-sequoia-sq 0.40.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092378,
regarding rust-sequoia-sq: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable:
librust-terminal-size-0.3+default-dev
to be marked as d
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2025 01:11:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092383: fixed in rust-rebuildctl 0.21.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092383,
regarding rust-rebuildctl: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable:
librust-env-logger-0.10+default-dev
to be marked as don
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2025 01:04:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092419: fixed in palo 2.26
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092419,
regarding palo: FTBFS: cp: cannot create regular file
'debian/palo/usr/share/doc/palo/README': Permission denied
to be marked as done.
Th
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:55:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091063: fixed in libamplsolver 0~20190702-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091063,
regarding libamplsolver: FTBFS: asl.h:22:10: fatal error: arith.h: No such file
or directory
to be marked as done.
This
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1092075 + ftbfs
Bug #1092075 [src:libsbml] libsbml ftbfs with Python 3.13 as the default
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1092075: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jan 2025 00:28:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092389: fixed in rust-numbat-cli 1.11.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092389,
regarding rust-numbat-cli: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable:
librust-terminal-size-0.3+default-dev
to be marked as d
Package: meld
Version: 3.22.2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream patch
https://bugs.gentoo.org/941526 has the trivial fix.
$ meld
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/meld", line 462, in
sys.exit(main())
^^
File "/usr/bin/meld", line 458, in main
return ru
Thanks, Lucas. I'll have a look at the Fontforge scripts.
Cheers,
--
Danai
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025, 03:57 Lucas Nussbaum, wrote:
> Source: latex-cjk-chinese-arphic
> Version: 2.0
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-2025010
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1091403 + ftbfs
Bug #1091403 [src:brian] brian FTBFS with Python 3.13 as default
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1091403: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1092072 + ftbfs
Bug #1092072 [src:brian] brian ftbfs with Python 3.13 as the default
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1092072: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1092078 + ftbfs
Bug #1092078 [src:persalys] persalys ftbfs with Python 3.13 as the default
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1092078: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1092077 + ftbfs
Bug #1092077 [src:openstructure] openstructure ftbfs with Python 3.13 as the
default
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1092077: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
Hi all,
now that it is trivial to make a container image containing cluster3
from previous releases, and as cluster3's merit is now historical, how
about we remove the package from the next releases? As we see here,
non-free packages cost more to Debian than free ones...
Have a nice day,
Charle
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1091516 trixie sid
Bug #1091516 [src:vtk-dicom] vtk-dicom FTBFS with Python 3.13 as default
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1091516: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
On Sat, 4 Jan 2025, 10:27 pm Niels Thykier, wrote:
>
> In the mean time, the transition has moved to the endgame with the bug
> now becoming RC (a regular FTBFS in sid). I can offer to do a NMU of
> wordpress/6.6.1+dfsg1-1 with a minimal patch to fix the bug (1-line
> `Rules-Requires-Root: binary
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1091063 in ampl-netlib-solvers reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/libamplsolver/-/commit/424157724e64c
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1091063 [src:libamplsolver] libamplsolver: FTBFS: asl.h:22:10: fatal
error: arith.h: No such file or directory
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1091063: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091063
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@
Hi NoisyCoil,
On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 11:13:13PM +0100, NoisyCoil wrote:
> I've already fixed this in Salsa together with a number of related bugs,
> will ask someone from the Rust Team for sponsorship soon (a large migration
> is expected in the next few hours, so I'm trying to avoid interference
These two bugs look a bit like
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-eventlet/+bug/2091540.
Maybe also https://github.com/tornadoweb/tornado/issues/3443 in the
tornado case? It's not very clear to me, though.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi!
On Tue, 2025-01-07 at 13:08:28 -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Lucas" == Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> > install: cannot change ownership of
> > 'debian/krb5-admin-server/usr/sbin/krb5_newrealm': Operation not permitted
> It looks like this is a result of defaulting to
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jan 2025 22:20:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091951: fixed in sphinx 8.1.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091951,
regarding sphinx: FTBFS: FAILED
tests/test_builders/test_build_html_copyright.py::test_html_multi_line_copyright
to be marked as done
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1092384 [src:krb5] krb5: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:111:
override_dh_install-arch] Error 1
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1092384: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092384
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Hi Lucas,
On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 08:45:01PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: rust-sequoia-sq
> Version: 0.40.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
as usual, thanks for your continuous bug fi
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jan 2025 22:12:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1089405: fixed in openguides 0.84-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089405,
regarding openguides: Supporting rootless builds by default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jan 2025 22:13:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1089414: fixed in pillow 10.4.0-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089414,
regarding pillow: Supporting rootless builds by default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #1092378 [src:rust-sequoia-sq] rust-sequoia-sq: FTBFS: build-dependency not
installable: librust-terminal-size-0.3+default-dev
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1092378: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092378
Debian Bug Tracking Sys
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hi Holger,
I've already fixed this in Salsa together with a number of related bugs,
will ask someone from the Rust Team for sponsorship soon (a large
migration is expected in the next few hours, so I'm trying to avoid
interferences).
Cheers!
control: tag -1 + pending
control: unblock -1 by 1092193
Hello,
We've added "Rules-Requires-Root: binary-targets" to the relevant parts
of our test corpus.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + pending
Bug #1092190 [dgit] test suite incompatible with new Rules-Requires-Root default
Added tag(s) pending.
> unblock -1 by 1092193
Bug #1092190 [dgit] test suite incompatible with new Rules-Requires-Root default
1092190 was blocked by: 1092193
1092190 wa
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jan 2025 21:53:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1092309: fixed in castle-game-engine 7.0~alpha.3+dfsg1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092309,
regarding castle-game-engine: autopkgtest regression in testing
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Tue, 7 Jan 2025 22:45:08 +0100
with message-id
and subject line closing, one year of linux kernel headers mess
has caused the Debian Bug report #1081902,
regarding src:gcc-14-cross: unsatisfied build dependency in testing:
libc6-dev:$host and libc6-dev-amd64-cross:$build
to be
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #1092398 [src:autopkgtest] autopkgtest: FTBFS: tests fail
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1092398: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092398
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Tue, 07 Jan 2025 at 20:28:33 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "/<>/tests/autopkgtest", line 1898, in
> > test_build_parallel
> > self.assertIn('dh build', err)
> > AssertionError: 'dh build' not found in [a long strin
Tobias Frost writes:
> Source: classified-ads
> Version: RM: classified-ads - RC-buggy, unmaintained
> Severity: serious
...
> It is currently RC buggy with those bugs:
...
> I therefore propose to RM the package to be removed from Debian
Yes, facts are
- I have not had time to maintain the
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jan 2025 21:20:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1082392: fixed in python-ttn-client 1.2.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1082392,
regarding python-ttn-client: FTBFS (requires Internet access)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jan 2025 21:15:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1089391: fixed in mono 6.12.0.199+dfsg-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089391,
regarding mono: Supporting rootless builds by default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1091403 serious
Bug #1091403 [src:brian] brian FTBFS with Python 3.13 as default
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> severity 1091516 serious
Bug #1091516 [src:vtk-dicom] vtk-dicom FTBFS with Python 3.13 as default
Severity set to '
Hi Graham,
On Tue, 2025-01-07 at 10:36 -0100, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Source: castle-game-engine
> Version: 7.0~alpha.3+dfsg1-2
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: regression
>
> Hi Maintainer
>
> Sometime around 2024-12-17, castle-game-engine's autopkgtest regressed
Was waiting for breeze 6.2.5 sitting in NEW.
Le mardi 7 janvier 2025, 20:51:53 UTC+1 Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Source: plasma-browser-integration
> Version: 6.2.5-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jan 2025 21:29:38 +0100
with message-id <3094787.ElGaqSPkdT@grummly>
and subject line Re: Bug#1092400: plasma-browser-integration: FTBFS:
build-dependency not installable: plasma-workspace-dev (>= 4:6.2.5~)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092400,
regarding plasma-brow
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jan 2025 21:29:56 +0100
with message-id <2651193.tdWV9SEqCh@grummly>
and subject line Re: Bug#1092432: plasma-desktop: FTBFS: build-dependency not
installable: plasma-workspace-dev (>= 4:6.2.5~)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092432,
regarding plasma-desktop: FTBFS:
Was waiting for breeze 6.2.5 sitting in NEW.
Le mardi 7 janvier 2025, 20:51:56 UTC+1 Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Source: powerdevil
> Version: 4:6.2.5-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
>
> Hi,
>
>
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jan 2025 21:30:20 +0100
with message-id <14416796.uLZWGnKmhe@grummly>
and subject line Re: Bug#1092401: powerdevil: FTBFS: build-dependency not
installable: plasma-workspace-dev (>= 4:6.2.5~)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092401,
regarding powerdevil: FTBFS: build-d
Was waiting for breeze 6.2.5 sitting in NEW.
Le mardi 7 janvier 2025, 20:51:54 UTC+1 Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Source: plasma-desktop
> Version: 4:6.2.5-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
>
> Hi,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1078616 golang-1.22: FTBFS because of expired certificate
Bug #1078616 [src:golang-1.22] golang-1.22: will FTBFS during trixie support
period
Changed Bug title to 'golang-1.22: FTBFS because of expired certificate' from
'golang-1.22: wil
Source: zeroc-ice
Version: 3.7.10-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=zeroc-
ice&arch=amd64&ver=3.7.10-3%2Bb1&stamp=1736266983&raw=0
modules/IcePy/Types.cpp: In static member function ‘static void
IcePy::StreamUtil::setSlicedDataMember(PyObject*, const I
Your message dated Tue, 7 Jan 2025 21:14:08 +0100
with message-id <6d92a1fd-3417-4ace-8e27-902005348...@debian.org>
and subject line fixed in 20
has caused the Debian Bug report #1081899,
regarding src:gcc-12-cross: unsatisfied build dependency in testing:
libc6-dev:$host and libc6-dev-amd64-cross
Processing control commands:
> close -1 2.22.1-1
Bug #1092437 [src:ensmallen] src:ensmallen: fails to migrate to testing for too
long
Marked as fixed in versions ensmallen/2.22.1-1.
Bug #1092437 [src:ensmallen] src:ensmallen: fails to migrate to testing for too
long
Marked Bug as done
--
10924
Hi,
On 07/01/25 at 13:08 -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Lucas" == Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> > install: cannot change ownership of
> > 'debian/krb5-admin-server/usr/sbin/krb5_newrealm': Operation not permitted
>
>
> It looks like this is a result of defaulting to rules-requires-root: no
> (wa
Source: libapache2-mod-python
Version: 3.5.0.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libapache2-mod-
python&arch=amd64&ver=3.5.0.1-3%2Bb2&stamp=1736260721&raw=0
/usr/share/apr-1.0/build/libtool --mode=compile --tag=disable-static
x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -pre
Hi,
On 07/01/25 at 12:08 -0800, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 08:36:47PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >
> > Relevant part (hopefully):
> > > install: cannot change ownership of
> > > 'debian/krb5-admin-server/usr/sbin/krb5_newrealm': Operation not permitted
>
> Hmm, I wonder
Source: erlang
Version: 1:25.3.2.12+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1:27.1.2+dfsg-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more t
Processing control commands:
> close -1 1:27.1.2+dfsg-1
Bug #1092439 [src:erlang] src:erlang: fails to migrate to testing for too long
Marked as fixed in versions erlang/1:27.1.2+dfsg-1.
Bug #1092439 [src:erlang] src:erlang: fails to migrate to testing for too long
Marked Bug as done
--
1092439:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1078635 serious
Bug #1078635 [src:puppetserver] puppetserver: will FTBFS during trixie support
period
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> forcemerge 1078635 1092396
Bug #1078635 [src:puppetserver] puppetserver: will FTBFS during tr
Source: ensmallen
Version: 2.21.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.22.1-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: elixir-lang
Version: 1.14.0.dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.17.3.dfsg-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more tha
Processing control commands:
> close -1 1.17.3.dfsg-2
Bug #1092438 [src:elixir-lang] src:elixir-lang: fails to migrate to testing for
too long
Marked as fixed in versions elixir-lang/1.17.3.dfsg-2.
Bug #1092438 [src:elixir-lang] src:elixir-lang: fails to migrate to testing for
too long
Marked Bu
On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 08:36:47PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > install: cannot change ownership of
> > 'debian/krb5-admin-server/usr/sbin/krb5_newrealm': Operation not permitted
Hmm, I wonder if that's some unshare fallout -- I know I haven't done any
krb5 bui
> "Lucas" == Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> install: cannot change ownership of
> 'debian/krb5-admin-server/usr/sbin/krb5_newrealm': Operation not permitted
It looks like this is a result of defaulting to rules-requires-root: no
(was that change in your rebuild?)
I think that I need to set rules-
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1091402 [src:aflplusplus] aflplusplus FTBFS with Python 3.13 as default
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
1091402: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091402
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1092394 [src:birthday] birthday: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j8 test
returned exit code 2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1092394: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092394
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1092370 5:7.0.15-2
Bug #1092370 [src:redis] redis: CVE-2024-46981 CVE-2024-51741
Marked as found in versions redis/5:7.0.15-2.
> tags 1092370 + upstream
Bug #1092370 [src:redis] redis: CVE-2024-46981 CVE-2024-51741
Added tag(s) upstream.
> t
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Repro this off the Salsa HEAD:
make[1]: Leaving directory
'/home/nabijaczleweli/uwu/birthday-1.6.2/build-output/birthday-1.6.2'
dh_auto_test
make -j24 test
make[1]: Entering directory
'/home/nabijaczleweli/uwu/birthday-1.6.2/build-output/birthday-1.6.2'
s
Source: mrb
Version: 0.3+nmu3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
> dh_tes
Source: xscavenger
Version: 1.4.5-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direc
Source: mysecureshell
Version: 2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering dire
Source: hyprpaper
Version: 0.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> +---
Source: plasma-desktop
Version: 4:6.2.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> +
Source: mwrap
Version: 1.1.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-f
Source: latex-cjk-chinese-arphic
Version: 2.0
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: gopher
Version: 3.0.17.3+nmu1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering dir
Source: lastpass-cli
Version: 1.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering dir
Source: tailspin
Version: 4.0.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> +---
Source: psgml
Version: 1.4.0-12.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
> ne
Source: flexml
Version: 1.9.6-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory
Source: shim-helpers-amd64-signed
Version: 1+15.8+1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]
Source: gecode-snapshot
Version: 6.2.0+git20240207-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debia
Source: rust-du-dust
Version: 1.1.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> +
Source: userv
Version: 1.2.1~beta4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250106 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering direct
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
