Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 1089138 0.21.1-1
Bug #1089138 [src:rust-rust-ini] src:rust-rust-ini: fails to migrate to testing
for too long
Bug #1091036 [src:rust-rust-ini] rust-rust-ini: FTBFS: build-dependency not
installable: librust-trim-in-place-0.1+default-dev
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1090273
> https://github.com/marshmallow-code/flask-marshmallow/issues/345
Bug #1090273 [src:python-flask-marshmallow] python-flask-marshmallow: FTBFS: E
ResourceWarning: unclosed database in
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://
Your message dated Tue, 24 Dec 2024 06:34:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1082290: fixed in rich 13.9.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1082290,
regarding rich FTBFS with Python 3.13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 06:33:56PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: yagiuda
> Version: 1.19-11
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
>
> > random.c: In function
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 1091300 -1
Bug #1091300 [src:firefox-esr] firefox-esr: FTBFS on armhf: warning:
swgl@0.1.0: fatal error: error in backend: Do not know how to scalarize the
result of this operator!
Bug 1091300 cloned as bug 1091340
> reassign -1 clang-19
B
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xtail
Version: 2.1-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on
On Mon, 2024-12-23 at 18:42 +0100, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> Hi,
>
> That's an AWESOME idea :-)
>
> This will also please FTP-Masters for proceeding the RM of the other
> package.
>
> Greetings
>
I also support this idea.
I want to tranfer the duplicate python3-google-api-python-client to be
Your message dated Tue, 24 Dec 2024 02:48:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091180: fixed in plattenalbum 2.2.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091180,
regarding missing dependency on python3-mpd
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Tue, 24 Dec 2024 02:46:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1072436: fixed in moc 1:2.6.0~svn-r3005-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1072436,
regarding moc: FTBFS with ffmpeg 7.0: ffmpeg.c:565:13: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘av_get_channel_layout_nb_cha
Your message dated Tue, 24 Dec 2024 02:35:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091118: fixed in device-tree-compiler 1.7.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091118,
regarding device-tree-compiler: FTBFS: libfdt_wrap.c:5599:17: error: too few
arguments to function ‘SWIG_Python_AppendO
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1091302 [src:dovecot] dovecot: FTBFS on armhf: dh_auto_test: error: make
-j4 check "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j4 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1091302: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091302
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 06:46:41PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
> on armhf.
>
> This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so this is a regression.
> Also, there are no known issues on a
Control: tags 1091118 +pending
On 2024-12-23, Florian Ernst wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 05:44:11PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > /<>/./pylibfdt/libfdt_wrap.c: In function
>> > ‘_wrap_fdt_next_node’:
>> > /<>/./pylibfdt/libfdt_wrap.c:5599:17: error: too few
>> > arguments to f
Processing control commands:
> tags 1091118 +pending
Bug #1091118 [src:device-tree-compiler] device-tree-compiler: FTBFS:
libfdt_wrap.c:5599:17: error: too few arguments to function
‘SWIG_Python_AppendOutput’
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1091118: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1
Updated from old-stable and followed the instructions.
Now gnome-authenticator works as expected, including the previous
crashing when pressing the '+', 'providers' and 'preference' buttons.
Regards,
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:11:41 + Matthias Geiger
wrote:
> Control: tag -1 pending
>
> H
Your message dated Tue, 24 Dec 2024 00:04:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1089892: fixed in gnumeric 1.12.57-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1089892,
regarding gnumeric: stop calling dh_buildinfo
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Mon, 23 Dec 2024 23:34:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1090249: fixed in nose2 0.15.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1090249,
regarding nose2: FTBFS: failing tests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Mon, 23 Dec 2024 23:34:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1090103: fixed in klepto 0.2.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1090103,
regarding klepto: FTBFS: ERROR: Invalid value `None` in
intersphinx_mapping['https://docs.python.org/3/']. Expected a two-element tup
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1091232 5.115.0-2
Bug #1091232 [src:khtml] RM: khtml -- RoQA; Obsolete
Marked as found in versions khtml/5.115.0-2.
> tags 1040417 + sid trixie
Bug #1040417 [docker-compose] docker-compose V1 is depreciated.
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> fo
Your message dated Mon, 23 Dec 2024 23:24:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1090170: fixed in sqlalchemy-i18n 1.1.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1090170,
regarding sqlalchemy-i18n: FTBFS: ERROR: Invalid value `None` in
intersphinx_mapping['http://docs.python.org/']. Expected a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # exact duplicate of 1091256
> close 1091259
Bug #1091259 [src:adjtimex] adjtimex: FTBFS on armhf: adjtimex.c:1641:24:
error: passing argument 1 of ‘ctime’ from incompatible pointer type
[-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Your message dated Mon, 23 Dec 2024 23:06:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1090102: fixed in kitchen 1.2.6-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1090102,
regarding kitchen: FTBFS: ERROR: Invalid value `None` in
intersphinx_mapping['https://fedorahosted.org/releases/p/a/packagedb/doc/']
Your message dated Mon, 23 Dec 2024 22:52:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1090132: fixed in python-blessed 1.20.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1090132,
regarding python-blessed: FTBFS: ERROR: Invalid value `None` in
intersphinx_mapping['https://docs.python.org/3/']. Expected
Your message dated Mon, 23 Dec 2024 22:52:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1090131: fixed in python-anyqt 0.2.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1090131,
regarding python-anyqt: FTBFS: ERROR: Invalid value `None` in
intersphinx_mapping['https://docs.python.org/']. Expected a two-e
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1090170 in sqlalchemy-i18n reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/sqlalchemy-i18n/-/commit/1d5
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1090170 [src:sqlalchemy-i18n] sqlalchemy-i18n: FTBFS: ERROR: Invalid value
`None` in intersphinx_mapping['http://docs.python.org/']. Expected a
two-element tuple or list.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1090170: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1090102 in kitchen reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/kitchen/-/commit/eb15bc8b00715c16819
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1090131 in python-anyqt reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-anyqt/-/commit/4055b430a
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1090131 [src:python-anyqt] python-anyqt: FTBFS: ERROR: Invalid value
`None` in intersphinx_mapping['https://docs.python.org/']. Expected a
two-element tuple or list.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1090131: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1090102 [src:kitchen] kitchen: FTBFS: ERROR: Invalid value `None` in
intersphinx_mapping['https://fedorahosted.org/releases/p/a/packagedb/doc/'].
Expected a two-element tuple or list.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1090102: https://bugs.debian.org/c
Your message dated Mon, 23 Dec 2024 21:26:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1059673: fixed in trololio 1.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1059673,
regarding trololio: autopkgtest failure with Python 3.12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Mon, 23 Dec 2024 21:25:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1084587: fixed in pagure 5.11.3+dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1084587,
regarding pagure: removal of Python standard libraries in Python 3.13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1088660 trixie sid
Bug #1088660 [src:dclock] dclock FTBFS on 32bit time64 architectures:
-Wincompatible-pointer-types
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
108
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 1082321 = src:trac-customfieldadmin src:trac-wysiwyg
Bug #1082321 [trac] Missing Depends: python3-multipart for 3.13
Bug #1082323 [trac] Missing Depends: python3-multipart for 3.13
Removed indication that 1082321 affects trac-customfieldad
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 1085120
Bug #1091292 [src:asymptote] asymptote: FTBFS on armhf: make[4]: ***
[Makefile:14: hatch.png] Error 1
1091292 was not blocked by any bugs.
1091292 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1091292: 1085120
--
1091292: https://bugs.deb
Control: block -1 by 1085120
On 23.12.24 Lucas Nussbaum (lu...@debian.org) wrote:
Hi,
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to
> build on armhf.
>
> This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so this is a
> regression. Also, there are no known issues on amd64
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 1091286
Bug #1091286 {Done: Alexandre Detiste } [src:xsok] xsok:
FTBFS on armhf: showscore.c:75:15: error: passing argument 1 of ‘ctime’ from
incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bu
Your message dated Mon, 23 Dec 2024 19:49:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1090139: fixed in python-ebooklib 0.18-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1090139,
regarding python-ebooklib: FTBFS: ERROR: Invalid value `None` in
intersphinx_mapping['http://docs.python.org/']. Expected a t
On 23/12/24 at 19:02 +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 06:38:37PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> Hi Lucas,
>
> > > dwz:
> > > debian/darkradiant/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/darkradiant/modules/libradiantcore.so:
> > > Could not allocate memory: Cannot allocate memory
>
> d
On 23/12/24 at 18:38 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 xdg-desktop-portal: FTBFS on armhf:
> handle_add_notification: 'g_variant_equal (notification, arg_notification)'
> should be TRUE
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 at 18:44:04 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote
On 23/12/24 at 10:21 -0800, Kip Warner wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-12-23 at 18:42 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
> > on armhf.
>
> Hey Lucas,
>
> Can you please pull the latest upstream? I'm a Pistache maintainer. We
> released 0.4
Message ---
Source: xsok
Version: 1.02-21
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf
Same problem for me, i use Debian Testing wìth official cuda 565.57 Nvidia
drivers and 6.12.6 kernel.
I posted my experience in the Nvidia forum here
(https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/565-release-feedback-discussion/310777/319)
hoping in a Christmas present 😉 from Nvidia devs.
Now i am usin
El 23/12/24 a las 18:18, László Böszörményi (GCS) escribió:
I do not see in your statistics how many builds were tried, ie the
failing percent and not its plain number.
You are right. My mistake.
The 128 build failures I put in my people.debian.org page are the
end result of building the packa
Your message dated Mon, 23 Dec 2024 19:00:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1090833: fixed in freecad 1.0.0+dfsg-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1090833,
regarding freecad: ships possibly non-free font ASME Y14.5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 1082321 1082323
Bug #1082321 [trac] Missing Depends: python3-multipart for 3.13
Bug #1082323 [trac] Missing Depends: python3-multipart for 3.13
Removed indication that 1082323 affects trac-wysiwyg
Added indication that 1082323 affects t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1082321 trac
Bug #1082321 [src:trac-customfieldadmin] trac-customfieldadmin FTBFS with
Python 3.13
Bug reassigned from package 'src:trac-customfieldadmin' to 'trac'.
No longer marked as found in versions trac-customfieldadmin/0.4.0+svn18
Control: retitle -1 xdg-desktop-portal: FTBFS on armhf:
handle_add_notification: 'g_variant_equal (notification, arg_notification)'
should be TRUE
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 at 18:44:04 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package fail
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 xdg-desktop-portal: FTBFS on armhf: handle_add_notification:
> 'g_variant_equal (notification, arg_notification)' should be TRUE
Bug #1091290 [src:xdg-desktop-portal] xdg-desktop-portal: FTBFS on armhf:
(/<>/obj-arm-linux-gnueabihf/tests/../src/xdg-deskt
On Mon, 2024-12-23 at 18:42 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
> on armhf.
Hey Lucas,
Can you please pull the latest upstream? I'm a Pistache maintainer. We
released 0.4.26 this morning. Version 0.0.5 is pretty ancient.
--
Kip Wa
Source: dovecot
Version: 1:2.3.21.1+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages
Source: libapache2-mod-python
Version: 3.5.0.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary
Source: ntpsec
Version: 1.2.3+dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on
Source: x2gokdrive
Version: 0.0.0.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on
On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 06:38:37PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi Lucas,
> > dwz:
> > debian/darkradiant/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/darkradiant/modules/libradiantcore.so:
> > Could not allocate memory: Cannot allocate memory
did your VM run out of memory?
--
tobi
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1088660 [src:dclock] dclock FTBFS on 32bit time64 architectures:
-Wincompatible-pointer-types
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
1088660: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1088660
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Source: erlang-bitcask
Version: 2.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on
Source: ario
Version: 1.6-1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so
Source: photopc
Version: 3.07-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so
Source: debugedit
Version: 1:5.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf
Source: xtail
Version: 2.1-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so
Source: xtb
Version: 6.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so
Source: nfdump
Version: 1.7.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so
Source: pcl
Version: 1.14.0+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf
Source: yagiuda
Version: 1.19-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so
Source: fbb
Version: 7.011-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so
Source: rust-virtio-bindings
Version: 0.2.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages
Source: binutils-djgpp
Version: 2.35.1+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages
Source: sptk
Version: 3.9-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so this
Source: snek
Version: 1.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so
Source: kgames
Version: 2.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so
Source: haskell-warp
Version: 3.3.31-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on
Source: flint
Version: 3.1.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so
Source: whowatch
Version: 1.8.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf
Source: asymptote
Version: 2.95+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf
Source: binutils
Version: 2.43.50.20241221-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages
Source: sfnt2woff-zopfli
Version: 1.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on
Source: xsok
Version: 1.02-21
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so
Source: xphoon
Version: 2613+0-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf
Source: wmtime
Version: 1.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so
Source: kicad
Version: 8.0.6+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf
Source: kile
Version: 4:2.9.93-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so
Source: wmmoonclock
Version: 1.30-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf
Source: wmweather
Version: 2.4.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf
Source: w3cam
Version: 0.7.2-6.4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so
Source: gphoto2-cffi
Version: 0.4.3~a1-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on
Source: dh-make-golang
Version: 0.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on
Source: form
Version: 4.3.1+git20240409+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages
Source: jss
Version: 5.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so
Source: extractpdfmark
Version: 1.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on
Source: rust-bugreport
Version: 0.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on
Source: rust-vhost
Version: 0.13.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf
Source: ifmail
Version: 2.14tx8.10-29
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on
Source: rust-libphosh-sys
Version: 0.0.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on
Source: pdfsandwich
Version: 0.1.7-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf
Source: darkradiant
Version: 3.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf
Source: minc-tools
Version: 2.3.00+dfsg-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on
Source: nwipe
Version: 0.37-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so
Source: rust-vm-memory
Version: 0.16.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages on
Source: rust-virtio-queue
Version: 0.14.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20241223 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build
on armhf.
This package currently has binary packages
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
