Package: s390-tools
Version: 2.16.0-2.1
Severity: serious
With gcc 14, the s390-tools package do not build:
utilities.c: In function 'create_json_web_signature':
utilities.c:535:33: warning: 'EC_KEY_get0_group' is deprecated: Since OpenSSL
3.0 [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
535 |
Your message dated Mon, 02 Sep 2024 06:34:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1073470: fixed in symfony 7.1.4+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1073470,
regarding src:symfony: fails to migrate to testing for too long: uploader built
arch:all binaries
to be marked as done.
This m
Hi!
Il 01/09/24 18:32, Samuel Thibault ha scritto:
...
It would have been convenient to upload it to experimental, to be easily
able to reproduce the issue (building doxygen almost OOM-ed by laptop).
...
Next time you can perhaps use the deb package built within the CI:
https://salsa.debian.or
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 23:20:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1080223: fixed in mando 0.7.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1080223,
regarding FTBFS with setuptools 72: error: invalid command 'test'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 23:11:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066466: fixed in rlinetd 0.9.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066466,
regarding rlinetd: FTBFS: ../../src/cleanups.c:27:49: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘pmap_unset’ [-Werror=implicit-functio
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1018576 serious
Bug #1018576 [src:python-sentinels] python-sentinels: build-depends on
python3-nose or uses it for autopkgtest
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
Thanks! Wondering if I should maybe bring this to the Python team.
On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 7:33 AM Alexandre Detiste <
alexandre.deti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The repo for the nmu is here:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/detiste-guest/click-man/
>
> Please import all 3 branches.
>
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 22:39:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1079546: fixed in gtk4 4.15.6+ds-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1079546,
regarding gtk4: test regression in 4.15.x: two css tests failing on s390x
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 22:39:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1079545: fixed in gtk4 4.15.6+ds-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1079545,
regarding gtk4: test regression in 4.15.x: css/parser/math2.css test fails on
armel
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1080223 [src:mando] FTBFS with setuptools 72: error: invalid command 'test'
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1080223: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1080223
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1080223 in mando reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/mando/-/commit/61e7c517c3cd3a91271024b
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 20:56:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1080145: fixed in zope.i18nmessageid 6.1.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1080145,
regarding zope.i18nmessageid: FTBFS: ERROR: zope.i18nmessageid
(unittest.loader._FailedTest.zope.i18nmessageid)
to be mar
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1079546 [src:gtk4] gtk4: test regression in 4.15.x: two css tests failing
on s390x
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1079546 to the same tags previously set
--
1079546: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079546
Debian Bug T
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1079546 in gtk4 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gtk4/-/commit/4538b0f0eaa4d68266576ff9e5b9a64619c
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 20:39:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1079360: fixed in ola 0.10.9.nojsmin-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1079360,
regarding ola,ola-rdm-tests: both ship manpages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1079545 [src:gtk4] gtk4: test regression in 4.15.x: css/parser/math2.css
test fails on armel
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1079545 to the same tags previously set
--
1079545: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079545
De
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1079545 in gtk4 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gtk4/-/commit/f56af804c75d085d020d8a10f78c14caf80
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # not an issue in bookworm
> tags 1080230 + trixie sid
Bug #1080230 [src:python-django-swapper] FTBFS with setuptools 72:
django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured
Added tag(s) sid and trixie.
> tags 1076189 + trixie sid
Bug #1076189 [src:tools
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1078274 1.0.5+dfsg-1~deb12u1
Bug #1078274 {Done: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior }
[src:clamav] clamav: FTBFS: clamscan/assorted_test.py::TC::test_pe_cert_trust
FAILED
Marked as found in versions clamav/1.0.5+dfsg-1~deb12u1.
> tags 1078274 + boo
found 1078274 1.0.5+dfsg-1~deb12u1
tags 1078274 + bookworm
thanks
Hello. Unfortunately, while this is already fixed in trixie/sid,
it's now happening in bookworm:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/bookworm/amd64/clamav.html
Could we please fix it in bookworm as well?
(packages
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1079360 [ola,ola-rdm-tests] ola,ola-rdm-tests: both ship manpages
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1079360: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079360
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1079360 in ola reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/wouter/ola/-/commit/912ced22996663120befb35438c276c297e55102
On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 8:46 PM Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> apt-src_0.25.4.dsc:
> dscverify: apt-src_0.25.4.dsc failed signature check:
> gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
Yup, I don't sign half or even less ready packages.
> Do you maybe have git repository I could clone? Or can you
> tar up the t
Processing control commands:
> owner 1073481 !
Bug #1073481 [src:pydantic-core] pydantic-core: FTBFS: make[1]: ***
[debian/rules:15: execute_before_dh_auto_build] Error 101
Owner recorded as Colin Watson .
--
1073481: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073481
Debian Bug Tracking
Control: owner 1073481 !
On Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 06:11:12PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 04:31:58PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 06:00:16PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > I wonder whether you could take a look at this at some point? I took
> >
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 19:01:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1052763: fixed in gnuastro 0.23-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052763,
regarding libgnuastro18 has an undeclared file conflict on
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgnuastro_make.so
to be marked as done.
This
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1080144 https://github.com/herumi/xbyak/issues/191
Bug #1080144 [src:xbyak] xbyak: FTBFS: failing tests
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/herumi/xbyak/issues/191'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me i
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 18:52:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066563: fixed in ncbi-seg 0.0.2620-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066563,
regarding ncbi-seg: FTBFS: genwin.c:93:8: error: implicit declaration of
function ‘blastdb’ [-Werror=implicit-function-decla
On Fri Aug 30, 2024 at 8:29 PM CEST, Santiago Vila wrote:
It happens in testing already:
Yeah, I hadn't upgraded my packages since a few weeks.
I've ran a bisection with debbisect and it reported the following:
bisection finished successfully
last good timestamp: 20240809T084720Z
Hello László,
Am Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 08:10:22PM +0200 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS):
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 6:33 PM Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > If anything is unclear, I'm happy to resolve this.
> I started the update back then. Soon I got stuck, the current state
You can contact me. We ca
On Sun, 01 Sep 2024 at 13:01:17 +, Martin wrote:
> My company is still a heavy user of glib and gobject on armel. But
> certainly not of GTK. Is there still any use case for GTK on armel?
Probably not, but Debian has never really managed to do partial
architectures, which is why I felt obliged
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #1075569 [src:tgif] tgif: ftbfs with GCC-14
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1075569: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075569
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 18:34:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1080063: fixed in nbd 1:3.26.1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1080063,
regarding nbd-client: contains aliased location /sbin (DEP17)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Control: tags -1 + patch
This function (and callsite) is added by d/p/compilation-fixes.
Attaching patch based on 1:4.2.5-1.3.
наб
diff '--color=auto' -ru tgif-4.2.5.orig/debian/patches/compilation-fixes
tgif-4.2.5/debian/patches/compilation-fixes
--- tgif-4.2.5.orig/debian/patches/compilation-f
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 18:19:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075289: fixed in motif 2.3.8-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075289,
regarding motif: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1080063 [src:nbd] nbd-client: contains aliased location /sbin (DEP17)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1080063: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1080063
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1066563 [src:ncbi-seg] ncbi-seg: FTBFS: genwin.c:93:8: error: implicit
declaration of function ‘blastdb’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1066563: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066563
Debian
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1080063 in nbd reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/wouter/nbd/-/commit/f02ef895d68da32bfe9eb871318addc6ec0e6539
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1066563 in ncbi-seg reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/ncbi-seg/-/commit/52e172d234fefabe7d0cae9cc983a
On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 6:33 PM Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> If anything is unclear, I'm happy to resolve this.
I started the update back then. Soon I got stuck, the current state
is online [1]. The pod can't be processed and in the next few days I
don't have time to look at it.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 17:19:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1071832: fixed in aircrack-ng 1:1.7+git20230807.4bf83f1a-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1071832,
regarding aircrack-ng: FTBFS against libgcrypt 1.11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 17:19:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1051201: fixed in aircrack-ng 1:1.7+git20230807.4bf83f1a-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1051201,
regarding aircrack-ng: FTBFS due to failing test-wpapsk-cmac
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1070885 + sid trixie
Bug #1070885 {Done: Jonathan McDowell } [src:openocd]
openocd: FTBFS with libgpiod/2.1
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> tags 1079650 + sid trixie
Bug #1079650 [src:devscripts] devscripts: FTBFS due to use of `setup.py test
On Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 04:31:58PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 06:00:16PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I wonder whether you could take a look at this at some point? I took
> > a quick look at the newer pydantic-core (2.22.0), but there's some bad
> > news here: there ar
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 17:04:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1077930: fixed in guile-3.0 3.0.10+really3.0.9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1077930,
regarding src:guile-3.0: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on
armel, armhf, i386, ppc64el and mips64el
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1071832 in aircrack-ng reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/aircrack-ng/-/commit/19c3a4e82459d5
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1051201 in aircrack-ng reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-security-team/aircrack-ng/-/commit/19c3a4e82459d5
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1071832 [src:aircrack-ng] aircrack-ng: FTBFS against libgcrypt 1.11
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1071832: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071832
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1051201 [src:aircrack-ng] aircrack-ng: FTBFS due to failing
test-wpapsk-cmac
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1051201: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051201
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1080232 + sid trixie
Bug #1080232 [src:python-pgpdump] FTBFS with setuptools 72: error: invalid
command 'test'
Added tag(s) trixie and sid.
> tags 1080234 + sid trixie
Bug #1080234 [src:serpent] FTBFS with setuptools 72: error: invalid comma
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 16:50:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1080183: fixed in lwip 2.2.0+dfsg1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1080183,
regarding FTBFS with upcoming doxygen
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 16:48:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1074920: fixed in dolfinx-mpc 0.8.0.post1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1074920,
regarding dolfinx-mpc: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?66159
Bug #1080183 [src:lwip] FTBFS with upcoming doxygen
Ignoring request to change the forwarded-to-address of bug#1080183 to the same
value
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #1080183 [src:lwip] FTBFS with upcoming doxygen
Igno
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?66159
Bug #1080183 [src:lwip] FTBFS with upcoming doxygen
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?66159'.
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #1080183 [src:lwip] FTBFS with upcoming doxygen
Added tag(s) pe
control: forwarded -1 https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?66159
control: tags -1 + pending
Hello,
Paolo Greppi, le sam. 31 août 2024 11:26:12 +0200, a ecrit:
> Hi! I have rebuilt a few packages:
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doxygen/-/wikis/ratt_doxygen_1.12.0+ds-1-partial
> with the upcoming d
Hello László,
Am Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 03:20:55PM +0200 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS):
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 3:18 PM Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > I intent to NMU apt-src to fix its trivial FTFBS bug (essentially a
> > recode latin1..utf8 is the fix).
> Please just provide all the patches and
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1076885 1.0.3-6+deb11u1
Bug #1076885 [src:gss] gss: FTBFS: FAIL krb5context (exit status: 1)
Marked as found in versions gss/1.0.3-6+deb11u1.
> found 1076885 1.0.4-1
Bug #1076885 [src:gss] gss: FTBFS: FAIL krb5context (exit status: 1)
Marked
found 1076885 1.0.3-6+deb11u1
found 1076885 1.0.4-1
thanks
This is now failing in bullseye and bookworm as well.
I hope that at least this can be fixed in a bookworm point release.
The error is not exactly the same, but I suspect the root
cause is very likely to be the same, since both bookworm
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 16:05:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1077928: fixed in ironseed 0.4.0-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1077928,
regarding src:ironseed: flaky autopkgtest: CONTACTS.DTA: FAILED open or read
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 16:05:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1077928: fixed in ironseed 0.4.0-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1077928,
regarding ironseed: flaky autopkgtest on 32 arm: hits internal timeout
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2024 17:54:42 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1080288: libfuse-hurd-dev: libfuse.so requires
undefined "assert[_perror]" symbols, unlinkable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1080288,
regarding libfuse-hurd-dev: libfuse.so requires undefined "assert[_p
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 06:00:16PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I wonder whether you could take a look at this at some point? I took
> a quick look at the newer pydantic-core (2.22.0), but there's some bad
> news here: there are quite a few Rust packages that need updating
> first, and one that n
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 15:21:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1073470: fixed in symfony 6.4.11+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1073470,
regarding src:symfony: fails to migrate to testing for too long: uploader built
arch:all binaries
to be marked as done.
This
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 09:38:46PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 09:19:08PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > I disagree on the check being useless in general though. The
> > diversion should only be created when upgrading from a version of
> > libvirt that was not usr-merg
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 15:06:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1067709: fixed in dante 1.4.3+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067709,
regarding FTBFS in armel/armhf: some symbols disappeared
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Package: rust-tui
Severity: serious
Tags: trixie,sid
rust-tui's autopkgtest fails with the new version of rust-unicode-width.
The package is abandoned upstream with a reccomendation to move
to rust-ratatui.
I intend to move the remaining reverse dependencies to rust-ratatui.
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1080213 [src:distro-info] FTBFS with setuptools 72: error: invalid command
'test'
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1080213: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1080213
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1080213 in distro-info reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/distro-info/-/commit/732f4247f8172fd3c80168e01
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:hurd-libfuse
Bug #1080288 [libfuse-hurd-dev] libfuse-hurd-dev: libfuse.so requires undefined
"assert[_perror]" symbols, unlinkable
Warning: Unknown package 'libfuse-hurd-dev'
Added indication that 1080288 affects src:hurd-libfuse
Warning: Unknown pack
Control: affects -1 src:hurd-libfuse
X-Debbugs-CC: GNU Hurd Maintainers
debbugs didn't find the source package
(and honestly tracker.d.o seems extremely confused about src:hurd-libfuse too:
it's not in debian but it's in sid, there's uploads but no removal,
the last version listed in an upload
Hi Praveen,
Please try the proposed package update [1]. Can you confirm that all
Ruby parts are in place now?
Of course, I will remove protobuf_c.so from
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/google/ , the other installed place should
be the official location.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] dget -x https://people.d
Package: libfuse-hurd-dev
Version: 0.0.20140820-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
$ echo "int main() { fuse_main(); }" | cc -xc - -lfuse
: In function 'main':
:1:14: warning: implicit declaration of function 'fuse_main'
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
/
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 13:20:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1056684: fixed in psfex 3.24.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056684,
regarding (build-)depends on atlas, which is obsolete and scheduled for removal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 13:20:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1056686: fixed in scamp 2.10.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056686,
regarding (build-)depends on atlas, which is obsolete and scheduled for removal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 13:05:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1056688: fixed in source-extractor 2.28.0+ds-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056688,
regarding (build-)depends on atlas, which is obsolete and scheduled for removal
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Source: straight.plugin
Version: 1.4.1-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: setup.py-test
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for packages affected by setuptools 72, straight.plugin
failed to rebuild.
FWIW: I think these bugs were
Source: python-pyhcl
Version: 0.4.4-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: setup.py-test
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for packages affected by setuptools 72, python-pyhcl
failed to rebuild.
FWIW: I think these bugs were all c
On 2024-09-01 12:46, Simon McVittie wrote:
> So, I'm invoking Debian Constitution §2.1.1 and declining to attempt
> to fix this upstream myself. If someone from the ARM porting team
> feels strongly that armel should continue to be a first-class-citizen
> architecture for GTK for whatever reason, p
Source: python-xstatic-mdi
Version: 1.6.50.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: setup.py-test
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for packages affected by setuptools 72, python-xstatic-mdi
failed to rebuild.
FWIW: I think these
Source: python-xstatic-magic-search
Version: 0.2.5.1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: setup.py-test
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for packages affected by setuptools 72,
python-xstatic-magic-search
failed to rebuild.
FW
Source: python-flask-seeder
Version: 1.2.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: setup.py-test
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for packages affected by setuptools 72,
python-flask-seeder
failed to rebuild.
FWIW: I think these
Source: python-xstatic
Version: 1.0.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: setup.py-test
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for packages affected by setuptools 72, python-xstatic
failed to rebuild.
FWIW: I think these bugs were a
Source: python-potr
Version: 1.0.2-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: setup.py-test
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for packages affected by setuptools 72, python-potr
failed to rebuild.
FWIW: I think these bugs were all cau
Source: python-mujson
Version: 1.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: setup.py-test
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for packages affected by setuptools 72, python-mujson
failed to rebuild.
FWIW: I think these bugs were all c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1080208 click/0.5.2-4
Bug #1080208 [src:click] FTBFS: RuntimeError("Support for the test command was
removed in Setuptools 72")
Marked as found in versions click/0.5.2-4.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1080213 distro-info/1.7
Bug #1080213 [src:distro-info] FTBFS with setuptools 72: error: invalid command
'test'
Marked as found in versions distro-info/1.7.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
10
Thank you for your reply
I've forgotten to write that I installed Debian using live CD
debian-live-12.6.0-amd64-gnome.iso, I hope this info will help
Source: python-autopage
Version: 0.4.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: setup.py-test
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for packages affected by setuptools 72, python-autopage
failed to rebuild.
FWIW: I think these bugs were
Source: python-editor
Version: 1.0.3-7
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: setup.py-test
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for packages affected by setuptools 72, python-editor
failed to rebuild.
FWIW: I think these bugs were all
Source: pyemd
Version: 0.5.1.54.g802fa86-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: setup.py-test
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for packages affected by setuptools 72, pyemd
failed to rebuild.
FWIW: I think these bugs were all cau
Source: morfessor
Version: 2.0.6-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: setup.py-test
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for packages affected by setuptools 72, morfessor
failed to rebuild.
FWIW: I think these bugs were all caused
Source: hovercraft
Version: 2.7-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: setup.py-test
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for packages affected by setuptools 72, hovercraft
failed to rebuild.
FWIW: I think these bugs were all caused
Source: flent
Version: 2.1.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: setup.py-test
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for packages affected by setuptools 72, flent
failed to rebuild.
FWIW: I think these bugs were all caused by setup
Source: apscheduler
Version: 3.10.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: setup.py-test
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for packages affected by setuptools 72, apscheduler
failed to rebuild.
FWIW: I think these bugs were all ca
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1080208 src:click
Bug #1080208 [click] FTBFS: RuntimeError("Support for the test command was
removed in Setuptools 72")
Bug reassigned from package 'click' to 'src:click'.
No longer marked as found in versions click/0.5.2-4.
Ignoring req
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1080213 src:distro-info
Bug #1080213 [distro-info] FTBFS with setuptools 72: error: invalid command
'test'
Bug reassigned from package 'distro-info' to 'src:distro-info'.
No longer marked as found in versions distro-info/1.7.
Ignoring re
Your message dated Sun, 01 Sep 2024 12:05:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1073719: fixed in mcstrans 3.7-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1073719,
regarding mcstrans: move aliased files from / to /usr (DEP17)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Control: tags -1 + patch pending
On Sat, 24 Aug 2024 at 09:24:02 -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> A new test added in gtk4 4.15.* is failing on armel but not on any
> other release architecture.
...
> not ok 1 /<>/testsuite/css/parser/math2.css
The bug is that GTK implements CSS expressions like `rou
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch pending
Bug #1079545 [src:gtk4] gtk4: test regression in 4.15.x: css/parser/math2.css
test fails on armel
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
--
1079545: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079545
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1080235 {Done: Nilesh Patra } [src:python-pulp] FTBFS
with setuptools 72: E: pybuild pybuild:389: test: plugin distutils failed with:
exit code=1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1080235: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1080235
Debia
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
