Your message dated Thu, 25 Jul 2024 06:49:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075064: fixed in heimdal 7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075064,
regarding heimdal: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
> rust-axum is unable to migrate to Testing because its autopkgtests are
> failing
>> I wonder why you are investing so much time and aggravation into
>> getting the tests to work in Debian?
>
> Rust packages in Debian often deviate from upstream, making it
> particularly relevant for Debian to
Merge Request available in Salsa:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/rapidjson/-/merge_requests/2
This bug makes many packages FTBDS and therefore flagged for auto-
removal, so can this be fixed swiftly?
Mattias
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 2024-07-24 10:42, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
* Reinhard Tartler [2024-07-24 09:36]:
Looking closer at the tests, it appears that they are iterating over
all installed network interfaces, and try to query them for
statistics. In that 'unshare -nr' context, they still find a loopback
interfac
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1075336 src:rapidjson
Bug #1075336 [rapidjson] opencascade: ftbfs with GCC-14
Bug reassigned from package 'rapidjson' to 'src:rapidjson'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1075336 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1075336 rapidjson
Bug #1075336 [rapdijson] opencascade: ftbfs with GCC-14
Warning: Unknown package 'rapdijson'
Bug reassigned from package 'rapdijson' to 'rapidjson'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1075336 to the same va
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1075336 rapdijson
Bug #1075336 [src:opencascade] opencascade: ftbfs with GCC-14
Bug reassigned from package 'src:opencascade' to 'rapdijson'.
Warning: Unknown package 'rapdijson'
Warning: Unknown package 'rapdijson'
No longer marked as fo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 1074897 1075336 1074823
Bug #1074897 [src:rapidjson] rapidjson: causes FTBFS with GCC-14
Bug #1075575 [src:rapidjson] rapidjson: causes FTBFS with GCC-14
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #1075336 is 'src:opencascade' not 'src:ra
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/exAspArk/batch-loader/issues/87
Bug #1064754 [src:ruby-batch-loader] ruby-batch-loader: FTBFS: ERROR: Test
"ruby3.1" failed: GraphQL::Error:
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/exAspArk/batch-loader/issues/87'.
--
1
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/exAspArk/batch-loader/issues/87
Updating forwarded info to upstream issue.
OpenPGP_0x8F53E0193B294B75.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[ 67%] Building C object
CMakeFiles/updater-stub.dir/src/feature/updater-main.c.o
/usr/bin/cc -DBUILD_GL -DBUILD_GLES2 -DBUILD_GLES3 -DBUILD_STATIC -DENABLE_SCRIPTING -DHAVE_CRC32 -DHAVE_FREELOCALE -DHAVE_FUTIMENS -DHAVE_FUTIMES -DHAVE_LOCALE
-DHAVE_LOCALTIME_R -DHAVE_NEWLOCALE -DHAVE_PTHREAD_CR
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1076313 [src:scikit-build] scikit-build's autopkg tests fail with
setuptools 70
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1076313: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076313
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: scikit-build
Version: 0.17.6-2
Followup-For: Bug #1076313
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu oracular ubuntu-patch
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
Would it be possible to consider the attached patch as the solution for this
issue?
I have cherry-picked ups
Your message dated Thu, 25 Jul 2024 03:04:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076964: fixed in dh-elpa 2.1.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1076964,
regarding dh-elpa: load-path handling broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Package: qt6-base-dev
Version: 6.6.2+dfsg-10
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: ajq...@debian.org
Dear Maintainers,
I recently updating LXQt to new upstream release which uses Qt6. And I
got salsa-ci detected
Your message dated Thu, 25 Jul 2024 02:35:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075307: fixed in ncbi-tools6 6.1.20170106+dfsg2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075307,
regarding ncbi-tools6: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1074917 by 1074897
Bug #1074917 [src:discord-rpc] discord-rpc: ftbfs with GCC-14
1074917 was not blocked by any bugs.
1074917 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1074917: 1075575 and 1074897
>
End of message, stopping process
Your message dated Thu, 25 Jul 2024 01:49:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075328: fixed in nyquist 3.23+ds-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075328,
regarding nyquist: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Thu, 25 Jul 2024 01:04:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1074996: fixed in ghostscript 10.03.1~dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1074996,
regarding ghostscript: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Thu, 25 Jul 2024 00:34:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075033: fixed in goo 0.155+ds-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075033,
regarding goo: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jul 2024 23:49:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075189: fixed in libmpd 11.8.17-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075189,
regarding libmpd: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jul 2024 23:49:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075019: fixed in gmpc-plugins 11.8.16-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075019,
regarding gmpc-plugins: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jul 2024 23:49:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075017: fixed in gmpc 11.8.16-22
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075017,
regarding gmpc: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Installing initramfs-tools_0.143_all.deb and
initramfs-tools-core_0.143_all.deb (plus dependency dracut-install)
seems to have fixed the issue for me too (although I haven't rebooted yet).
I had to run "update-initramfs -k all -u" to get it to regenerate the
previous kernels, apt only managed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 684134 serious
Bug #684134 [locales] Package 'locales' resets pre-set debconf variable
'default_environment_locale' on install
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
I have reverted the commit causing the issue in team repo[1].
I have also implemented another approach to avoid sub-directories in
`load-path', and tested with some success. You can find the diff in [2]
or attached. Please let me know what you think. Will push after
getting some approvals.
Mea
Some more logs running a nested kwin_wayland under an X11 session in a VM.
Below the diff with a identical launch after reverting to wayland libraries
1.22.
The following line in the crashing case looks interesting :
+wl_global_create: implemented version for 'wl_shm' higher than interface
vers
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1075017 + pending
Bug #1075017 [src:gmpc] gmpc: ftbfs with GCC-14
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1075017: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075017
Debia
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jul 2024 22:07:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075582: fixed in toppler 1.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075582,
regarding toppler: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 1005961 fq/0.9.0-2
Bug #1005961 {Done: Hilmar Preuße } [nq,fq] nq,fq: trying
to overwrite '/usr/bin/fq', which is also in package nq 0.3.1-4
No longer marked as found in versions fq/0.9.0-2.
> notfound 1005961 fq/0.0.4-2
Bug #1005961 {Do
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jul 2024 21:34:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076863: fixed in dpkg 1.22.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #1076863,
regarding dpkg-dev: DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM_REVISION seems to be broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jul 2024 21:34:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076863: fixed in dpkg 1.22.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #1076863,
regarding dpkg-dev: no longer resolves variable DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM_REVISION
in core make
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Hi Paul,
> Don't forget to ask for removal of the current armhf binaries. They are
> not automatically removed: $(reportbug ftp.debian.org)
Done, see [1].
Thanks for the reminder!
Best,
François
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076975
signature.asc
Description: This is
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jul 2024 21:21:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075205: fixed in libslow5lib 0.7.0+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075205,
regarding libslow5lib: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
24.07.2024 23:26, Michael Tokarev wrote:
LDB_DEB_VERSION = 2:${LDB_VERSION}+samba${DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM_REVISION}
This is #1076863 in dpkg-dev.
/mjt
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jul 2024 20:54:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075532: fixed in spoa 4.1.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075532,
regarding spoa: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Processing control commands:
> tag 1076863 pending
Bug #1076863 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-dev: DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM_REVISION seems to be
broken
Bug #1076939 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-dev: no longer resolves variable
DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM_REVISION in core make
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1076863:
Control: tag 1076863 pending
Hi!
Bug #1076863 in package dpkg reported by you has been fixed in
the dpkg/dpkg.git Git repository. You can see the changelog below, and
you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://git.dpkg.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/diff/?id=c05f82972
---
scripts/mk: Fix pkg-inf
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jul 2024 20:38:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075083: fixed in ident2 1.07-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075083,
regarding ident2: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
24.07.2024 23:06, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Source: samba
Version: 4.20.2+dfsg-8
Severity: serious
On 2024-07-24 18:50, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
Version check failed:
Your upload included the binary package ldb-tools, version 2:2.9.1+samba, for
riscv64,
however testing already has version 2:2.9
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1075430 [qtbase5-dev] qtlocation-opensource-src: ftbfs with GCC-14
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1075430: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075430
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1075430 in qtbase-opensource-src reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtbase/-/commit/ce820e188a4b
Source: samba
Version: 4.20.2+dfsg-8
Severity: serious
On 2024-07-24 18:50, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>
>
> Version check failed:
> Your upload included the binary package ldb-tools, version 2:2.9.1+samba, for
> riscv64,
> however testing already has version 2:2.9.1+samba4.20.2+dfsg-7.
> Upload
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1075331 with 1074897
Bug #1075331 [src:octave] octave: ftbfs with GCC-14
1075331 was not blocked by any bugs.
1075331 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1075331: 1075575 and 1074897
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Package: src:rust-pkcs8
Version: 0.10.2+ds-10
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --source
Package: src:rust-ed25519
Version: 2.2.3+ds-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --source
Package: src:mako
Version: 1.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with=sphinxdoc,py
Package: src:python-mpv
Version: 1.0.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with python
Package: src:napari
Version: 0.5.0~a5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with python3
Package: src:halide
Version: 18.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with python3 -
Package: src:gsad
Version: 22.9.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules build
dh build
dh_update_autotoo
Package: src:csaps
Version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with python3 --b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1075683 + pending
Bug #1075683 [src:xskat] xskat: ftbfs with GCC-14
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1075683: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075683
Deb
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jul 2024 19:34:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1063004: fixed in synfig 1.5.1+dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1063004,
regarding synfig: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jul 2024 19:33:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076879: fixed in epcr 2.3.12-1-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #1076879,
regarding epcr: FTBFS: re-PCR_main.cpp:30:10: fatal error: epcr/defaults.h: No
such file or directory
to be marked as done.
This m
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1076879 [src:epcr] epcr: FTBFS: re-PCR_main.cpp:30:10: fatal error:
epcr/defaults.h: No such file or directory
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1076879: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076879
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 qtbase5-dev 5.15.13+dfsg-3
Bug #1075430 [src:qtlocation-opensource-src] qtlocation-opensource-src: ftbfs
with GCC-14
Bug reassigned from package 'src:qtlocation-opensource-src' to 'qtbase5-dev'.
No longer marked as found in versions qtlocation-opensource
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1076879 in epcr reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/epcr/-/commit/aa1d5dfc21af5d3ae7502ec590834038fe285
Control: reassign -1 qtbase5-dev 5.15.13+dfsg-3
Control: affects -1 src:qtlocation-opensource-src
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 12:41:37PM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:qtlocation-opensource-src
> Version: 5.15.13+dfsg-2
> Severity: important
> Tags: sid trixie
> User: debian-...@lists.deb
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jul 2024 19:19:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075320: fixed in nsca-ng 1.6-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075320,
regarding nsca-ng: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1074797 ftbfs
Bug #1074797 [src:bcachefs-tools] FTBFS on i386, armel, armhf
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> retitle 1074797 bcachefs-tools: FTBFS on i386, armel, armhf
Bug #1074797 [src:bcachefs-tools] FTBFS on i386, armel, armhf
Changed Bug title to '
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1060570 ftbfs
Bug #1060570 [src:golang-github-containers-toolbox]
golang-github-containers-toolbox: Please switch Build-Depends to systemd-dev
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Hi,
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 18:22:02 + Jaycee Santos
wrote:
> According to [1], rebuilding kwin fixes the issue.
> Will the auto-kwayland transition[2] handle this?
No, that transition is something else.
--
Med vänliga hälsningar
Patrick Franz
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1076871 https://github.com/Ultimaker/Cura/pull/16103
Bug #1076871 [src:cura] cura: FTBFS: AttributeError: 'called_with' is not a
valid assertion. Use a spec for the mock if 'called_with' is meant to be an
attribute.
Set Bug forwarded-t
Hi, and thanks for the report.
[... snipped ...]
2: if not self._mock_unsafe and (not self._mock_methods or name not in
self._mock_methods):
2: if name.startswith(('assert', 'assret', 'asert', 'aseert',
'assrt')) or name in _ATTRIB_DENY_LIST:
2: > raise Attrib
Package: dh-elpa
Version: 2.1.2
Severity: serious
My recent commit[1] breaks `load-path' handling, which disables
recursive adding load-path from `/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/elpa' but
should have been in each package root directory.
Reverting the commit should be safe as no package holds source c
According to [1], rebuilding kwin fixes the issue.
Will the auto-kwayland transition[2] handle this?
1:
https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?s=2e65a0bb4be343d92fe0ffd24b9d8e37&p=6505230#post6505230
2: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-kwayland.html
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jul 2024 18:20:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1075423: fixed in python-shapely 2.0.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1075423,
regarding python-shapely: ftbfs with GCC-14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Package: src:slimit
Version: 0.8.1-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
dpkg-buildpackage: info: host architecture amd64
Package: src:pybdsf
Version: 1.10.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
dpkg-buildpackage: info: host architecture amd6
Package: src:onnxruntime
Version: 1.16.3+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary -Scmak
Package: src:mmh
Version: 0.4-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
debian/rules binary
dh binary --with bash-completio
Package: src:basemap
Version: 1.2.2+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
[...]
dpkg-buildpackage: info: host architecture
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jul 2024 19:19:20 +0200
with message-id <35875175.SxXBtFtcgi@bagend>
and subject line Re: Bug#1076582: initramfs-tools-core: mkinitramfs failure
zstd -q -9 -T0 70 (No space left on device)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1076582,
regarding initramfs-tools: duplicates n
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jul 2024 17:19:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076882: fixed in gnupg2 2.2.43-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1076882,
regarding gnupg2: FTBFS: configure error: You need libgcrypt to build this
program.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # this is now happening in trixie and sid
> severity 1069218 serious
Bug #1069218 [src:rocketcea] rocketcea ftbfs with Python 3.12
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> tags 1069218 + ftbfs
Bug #1069218 [src:rocketcea] rocketcea ftbfs with
On 24/07/2024 10.58, Diederik de Haas wrote:
On Sunday, 21 July 2024 13:13:23 CEST Simon John wrote:
[...]
What IS a general solution is upgrading initramfs-tools to version 0.143
currently available in Experimental as that can handle symlinks to
*directories*, whereas 0.142 could only deal wi
Package: pam-python
Version: 1.1.0
Severity: grave
The patch for Python 3.12 has been done incorrectly, so CVE-2019-16729
is actual again in this new version.
https://github.com/sunweaver/pam-python/pull/2/files#r1690115475
contains explanation.
Correct adaptation to Python 3.12 may look like:
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jul 2024 16:41:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1074789: fixed in systemd 256.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1074789,
regarding systemd-sysusers: Failed to check if group polkitd already exists:
Connection refused (on /run/systemd/userdb/io.systemd.D
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Add pending tags, Salsa fixes are present
> Tags 1076900 + pending
Bug #1076900 [src:onioncircuits] onioncircuits: FTBFS: help2man failure
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
Control: found -1 6.9.7-1~bpo12+1
On Wednesday, 24 July 2024 17:24:44 CEST Stefan wrote:
> I ran a few other tests:
>
> 1. tried package "linux-image-6.1.0-22-amd64": works
> 2. tried package "linux-image-6.9.7+bpo-amd64": does not work
Via https://snapshot.debian.org/package/linux-signed-amd64/
Processing control commands:
> found -1 6.9.7-1~bpo12+1
Bug #1076372 [src:linux] linux-image-6.5.0-0.deb12.4-amd64: ext4 file
corruption with newer kernels
Marked as found in versions linux/6.9.7-1~bpo12+1.
--
1076372: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076372
Debian Bug Trackin
Hi,
I ran a few other tests:
1. tried package "linux-image-6.1.0-22-amd64": works
2. tried package "linux-image-6.9.7+bpo-amd64": does not work
3. installed firmware from
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/
(the Debian package is a little bit old): 6.1.0
Hi
On Wed, 2024-07-24 at 16:35:44 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-07-24 at 14:37:53 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Both look like the same problem, which would be a regression from the
> > recent rework of the Makefile fragments. I'm CCing Nicolas as a
> > heads-up, and I'm looking int
Quoting Santiago Vila (2024-07-24 14:34:33)
> forcemerge 1076863 1076939
> affects 1076863 + src:radicale
> thanks
>
> El 24/7/24 a las 14:19, Jonas Smedegaard escribió:
> > This smells like a bug in dpkg - reported now as bug#1076939.
>
> Oh, I had already reported that one earlier today, didn't
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jul 2024 14:38:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1076920: fixed in samba 2:4.20.2+dfsg-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1076920,
regarding samba: FTBFS: dpkg-gensymbols: error: 2:+samba is not a valid version
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jul 2024 14:36:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1071967: fixed in libdata-fake-perl 0.006-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1071967,
regarding libdata-fake-perl: Test failures on 32bit architectures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Hi!
On Wed, 2024-07-24 at 14:37:53 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Both look like the same problem, which would be a regression from the
> recent rework of the Makefile fragments. I'm CCing Nicolas as a
> heads-up, and I'm looking into this to try to do a quick fix upload.
So there's something wron
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1071967 in libdata-fake-perl reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/libdata-fake-perl/-/
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1071967 [src:libdata-fake-perl] libdata-fake-perl: Test failures on 32bit
architectures
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1071967: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071967
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:20:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1066313: fixed in torsocks 2.4.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066313,
regarding torsocks: FTBFS: config-file.c:184:23: error: implicit declaration of
function ‘conf_file_set_enable_ipv6’ [-Werror=impli
close 1074763 2:24.0.0-5
thanks
Fixed with the -5 upload, -4 did not enter the archive.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1074763 2:24.0.0-5
Bug #1074763 {Done: Thomas Goirand } [src:cinder]
CVE-2024-32498: Arbitrary file access through custom QCOW2 external data
Marked as fixed in versions cinder/2:24.0.0-5.
Bug #1074763 {Done: Thomas Goirand } [src:cinder]
I can confirm this happens during a rebuild in my own sbuild chroots.
The core issue appears to be that when the make rules call help2man, the
version string provided is an empty string. Digging into d/rules, it looks
like DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM_REVISION is unset during the process, which is why
On Wednesday, 24 July 2024 13:21:36 CEST Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2024-07-24 10:58:24 +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > Uninstalling firmware YOU DON'T NEED is a perfectly valid solution.
>
> How can one do that? I mean, get only the Nvidia firmware for my
> particular Nvidia card, not everyth
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 1076863 1076939
Bug #1076863 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-dev: DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM_REVISION seems to be
broken
Bug #1076939 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-dev: no longer resolves variable
DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM_REVISION in core make
Bug #1076939 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-d
Processing control commands:
> forcemerge -1 1076939
Bug #1076939 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-dev: no longer resolves variable
DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM_REVISION in core make
Bug #1076863 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-dev: DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM_REVISION seems to be
broken
Bug #1076863 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-dev: DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM_
forcemerge 1076863 1076939
affects 1076863 + src:radicale
thanks
El 24/7/24 a las 14:19, Jonas Smedegaard escribió:
This smells like a bug in dpkg - reported now as bug#1076939.
Oh, I had already reported that one earlier today, didn't notice
they were in fact the same, so I'm force-merging th
Processing control commands:
> forcemerge -1 1076939
Bug #1076863 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-dev: DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM_REVISION seems to be
broken
Bug #1076939 [dpkg-dev] dpkg-dev: no longer resolves variable
DEB_VERSION_UPSTREAM_REVISION in core make
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
1076915 was
Control: forcemerge -1 1076939
Hi!
On Wed, 2024-07-24 at 12:17:21 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.22.8
> While building some packages I get weird errors like this:
>
> dpkg-deb: building package 'aspell-nl' in '../aspell-nl_2.20.19-2_all.deb'.
> dpkg-deb: building packa
1 - 100 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
