Package: src:xtensor
Version: 0.24.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
xtensor autopkg tests fail on i386 and s390x, see
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/i386/x/xtensor/35913428/log.gz
829s Built without XSIMD
829s Built without XSIMD
829s
=
Package: src:seqan3
Version: 3.2.0+ds-7
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
this blocks the otherwise unrelated migration of gcc-defaults.
see
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/s/seqan3/35917949/log.gz
[...]
35s + export CXX=g++
35s + export CC=gcc
35s + dpkg-buildflags --
Your message dated Tue, 18 Jul 2023 05:19:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1041257: fixed in flatbuffers 2.0.8+dfsg1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1041257,
regarding flatbuffers: FTBFS on amd64: symbol differences
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Tue, 18 Jul 2023 04:25:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#43: fixed in tf5 5.0beta8-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #43,
regarding tf5: depends on obsolete pcre3 library
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Package: adapta-gtk-theme
Severity: serious
Version: 3.95.0.11-2
Tags: sid trixie
X-Debbugs-CC: prof.franciscar...@gmail.com
Dear Debian adapta-gtk-theme package maintainer,
As stated in https://bugs.debian.org/1010199 , the upstream development of
this package has ended and it is now the candida
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:sdl12-compat 1.2.64-5
Bug #1041211 [src:libsdl-perl, src:sdl12-compat] libsdl-perl: FTBFS and
autopkgtest failure with sdl12-compat, especially on 32-bit
Bug reassigned from package 'src:libsdl-perl, src:sdl12-compat' to
'src:sdl12-compat'.
No longe
Control: reassign -1 src:sdl12-compat 1.2.64-5
Control: affects -1 src:libsdl-perl
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/libsdl-org/sdl12-compat/issues/305
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 at 10:35:14 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I can reproduce a use-after-free on amd64. The test doesn't crash on amd64
>
The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
gcc-13/g++-13, but succeeds to build with gcc-12/g++-12. The
severity of this report will be raised before the trixie release.
This issue was due to a missing #include , and it was already
fixed upstream in an unrelated commit.
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2023 22:51:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1041334: fixed in gtg 0.6-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1041334,
regarding gtg: FTBFS post-bookworm with changed prefix
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1041334 [src:gtg] gtg: FTBFS post-bookworm with changed prefix
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1041334: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1041334
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1041334 in gtg reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/gtg/-/commit/e4d55c0d6731f026c047766346a
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2023 21:50:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1040998: fixed in chromaprint 1.5.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1040998,
regarding chromaprint FTBFS with googletest 1.13.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1040998 in chromaprint reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/chromaprint/-/commit/0b105f3d5dcf1491
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1040998 [src:chromaprint] chromaprint FTBFS with googletest 1.13.0
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1040998: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040998
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Michael Biebl wrote...
> If (bookworm-) backports are a concern, you might also use something like
> this
>
> -libblockdev-crypto2,
> +udisks2 (>= 2.10) | libblockdev-crypto2,
Thanks for the suggestion, will adjust the still-not-yet-happened upload.
Christoph
signature.asc
Descrip
Package: convertall
Version: 0.8.0-2
Severity: serious
When running it:
% LANG=C convertall
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/convertall/convertall.py", line 143, in
main()
File "/usr/share/convertall/convertall.py", line 133, in main
import convertdlg
ModuleNotFou
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2023 19:48:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1041028: fixed in snappy 1.1.10-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1041028,
regarding snappy FTBFS with googletest 1.13.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2023 19:37:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1041300: fixed in qt6-base 6.4.2+dfsg-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #1041300,
regarding qt6-base-dev: undeclared file conflict with libqt6opengl6-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
We have been setting this in debian/rules in several other packages:
export DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_LAYOUT = deb
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
Hi Ian,
At 2023-07-17T14:32:40+0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Hi. Thanks for your comprehensive, detailed and helpful email.
You're most welcome.
> G. Branden Robinson writes ("Bug#1041317: dgit: table too wide in man
> page, trashes autopkgtests"):
> > I noticed that groff 1.23.0-2 (and -1 before
On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 05:07:25PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2023-07-15 09:55:04)
> > Quoting Fabian Grünbichler (2023-07-12 19:53:08)
> > > The feature in question is probably not a good candidate for packaging
> > > though, given the lack of stability guarantees p
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:22:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1037893: fixed in waylandpp 1.0.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1037893,
regarding waylandpp: ftbfs with GCC-13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Source: lava
Version: 2023.01-2
Severity: serious
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
your package fails the testsuite autopkgtest with pytest 7.4.
Hopefully relevant excerpt below:
548s === FAI
Source: html5lib
Version: 1.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
html5lib seems to fail to build due to a change in Traceback.filter()
Relevant excerpt from build log:
../../../html5lib/
Your message dated Tue, 18 Jul 2023 01:43:38 +0800
with message-id <20230717174338.tth2e2q67gp75...@tilde.fsfans.club>
and subject line close
has caused the Debian Bug report #1041333,
regarding syncthing: systemd user service fails to start due to bad
configuration file version
to be marked as do
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2023 17:51:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1041059: fixed in libdogleg 0.16-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1041059,
regarding FTBFS against suitesparse 7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:cura-engine
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
Hi Soren!
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 08:40:14AM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Am I reading that error message correctly that it is failing to build from
> source simply because the build machine doesn’t have enough RAM?
No, we are limited not by physical RAM, but by address space which is just
2 G
Package: src:linux
Version: 6.3.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
seen on amd64, the issue doesn't look related to gcc-12.
see
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/l/linux/35917919/log.gz
[...]
56sgcc-12
-Wp,-MMD,/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.f52ni744/downtmp/autopkgtest_tmp/fo
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2023 16:05:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1037811: fixed in opm-simulators 2023.04+ds-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1037811,
regarding opm-simulators: ftbfs with GCC-13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Source: gtg
Version: 0.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: trixie sid
gtg fails to build from source:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gtg&arch=all&ver=0.6-3&stamp=1689597184
The reason is that something changed the prefix post-bookworm so that debhelper tries to install the
python files
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 1041332 release.debian.org
Bug #1041332 [mrtg] mrtg: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/mrtg/mrtg.cfg
Added indication that 1041332 affects release.debian.org
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Package: syncthing
Version: 1.19.2~ds1-1+b4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: goodsp...@tilde.fsfans.club
Dear Maintainer,
The syncthing package installed on trixie/sid won't star from systemd.
$ systemctl --user start syncthing
Tracking down the journal,
Processing control commands:
> block 1040860 with -1
Bug #1040860 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package mrtg/2.17.10-5+deb12u1
1040860 was not blocked by any bugs.
1040860 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1040860: 1041332
--
1040860: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
Package: mrtg
Version: 2.17.10-5+deb12u1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: block 1040860 with -1
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2023 15:04:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1037648: fixed in faust 2.60.3+ds2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1037648,
regarding faust: ftbfs with GCC-13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch
Bug #1041229 [libltdl-dev] libltdl-dev: cannot install more than one
architecture due to M-A: same w/ Breaks/Provides/Replaces: libltdl3-dev
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1041229: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1041229
Debian Bug Tracking
Control: tag -1 patch
The multi-arch installation seems to work fine if
Breaks: libltdl3-dev
is replaced with
Conflicts: libltdl3-dev
Andreas
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2023 16:03:58 +0200
with message-id <15733f66-5405-4337-8b10-b12084d5a...@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #1037737,
regarding libreoffice: ftbfs with GCC-13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1037737 serious
Bug #1037737 {Done: Rene Engelhard }
[src:libreoffice] libreoffice: ftbfs with GCC-13
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> severity 1037732 serious
Bug #1037732 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [src:liborcus] liborcus:
ftbfs
El lunes, 17 de julio de 2023 01:31:04 -03 Helmut Grohne escribió:
> Package: qt6-base-dev
> Version: 6.4.2+dfsg-12
> Severity: serious
>
> The recent upload makes qt6-base-dev include a fair number of files also
> contained in libqt6opengl6-dev. Is this some kind of packaging mistake?
yeap, some
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1041317 [dgit] dgit: table too wide in man page, trashes autopkgtests
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
1041317: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1041317
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Thank you for fixing this! I'm hoping someone will take over this
package (or that upstream will roll a new releases that passes self-
tests which would allow me to more easily update the package) so I'll
leave this for future package maintainers. Feel free to push fixes to
git on salsa.
/Simon
Control: retitle -1 libltdl-dev: cannot install more than one architecture due
to M-A: same w/ Breaks/Provides/Replaces: libltdl3-dev
This is actually https://bugs.debian.org/770301 in dpkg
# apt-get install libltdl-dev:amd64
...
# apt-get install libltdl-dev:i386
Reading package lists... Done
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 libltdl-dev: cannot install more than one architecture due to M-A:
> same w/ Breaks/Provides/Replaces: libltdl3-dev
Bug #1041229 [libltdl-dev] dependency problems prevent configuration of
libltdl-dev
Changed Bug title to 'libltdl-dev: cannot install more
Processing control commands:
> unblock -1 by 1037538
Bug #1038671 [ftp.debian.org] RM: pupnp-1.8 -- RoQA; replaced by pupnp
1038671 was blocked by: 1037511 1037538
1038671 was not blocking any bugs.
Removed blocking bug(s) of 1038671: 1037538
--
1038671: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2023 11:34:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1037708: fixed in kmc 3.2.2+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1037708,
regarding kmc: ftbfs with GCC-13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Hey Joachim.
On Mon, 2023-07-17 at 08:49 +0200, Joachim Bauch wrote:
> do you have any of the "libheif-plugin-*" packages installed with
> 1.16.2?
Quoting myself :-)
On Sun, 2023-07-16 at 14:25 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> But after upgrading to 1.16.2-1+b1 dies works no longer (I ha
Am 17.07.23 um 13:07 schrieb Michael Biebl:
So, instead of changing the dependency from libblockdev-crypto2 to
libblockdev-crypto3, you might consider dropping the dependency
altogether, as clevis-udisks2 already depends on udisks2 and
clevis-crypto2 doesn't actually use libblockdev-crypto dire
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1040924 - moreinfo
Bug #1040924 [clevis-udisks2] clevis-udisks2: Depends on NBS libblockdev-crypto2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1040924: https://bugs.debian.org/cg
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 07:59:45 +0200 Christoph Biedl
wrote:
Control: Tags 1040924 +pending
Jeremy Bícha wrote...
> Yes, it's a transition. Sorry that it didn't follow the recommended procedure.
Thanks for the clarification. New version is underway, I'd like to do
some thourough testing, though.
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1037708 in kmc reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/kmc/-/commit/f17330044d60a83b9b43f895407bebd7f741180
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1037708 [src:kmc] kmc: ftbfs with GCC-13
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1037708: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037708
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
I want to echo what Simon said, please don't partake in commit
ping-pong, it is unbecoming of a Debian Developer, and not the correct
course of action if you disagree with something. It also reflects poorly
on the project, so please refrain from doing so, even if you don't agree
with how decisi
seems biojava now ships several jar files (core, biosql, ...) and not a
bundle anymore, used by logol,
see list of jar files available:
https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/libbiojava1.9-java/filelist
would need to patch logol to import/load expected jar files (and find which
ones are needed...) i
logol is not maintained anymore for quite some time now
effort to keep in line with swi-prolog updates (need to recompile on each
ABI break of swi-prolog) AND biojava requires frequent work for an old
software with low usage.
I would let it be removed
--
gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyrin
On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 at 18:43:08 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> One failure mode is that t/core_video.t crashes with signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
> during testing, usually (perhaps always?) after test point 65
I can reproduce a use-after-free on amd64. The test doesn't crash on amd64
for whatever reason, bu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 1038258 src:python-tomlkit
Bug #1038258 [src:pylint] pylint: Regression with tomlkit 0.11.8, Fixed in
2.17.4
Added indication that 1038258 affects src:python-tomlkit
> affects 1040051 src:prompt-toolkit
Bug #1040051 [pymodbus] autopkgtest
Hi Daniel,
On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 18:10:10 +0200 Daniel Baumann
wrote:
thanks for reporting this. however, I can't reproduce it - I don't think
the bug is caused by prompt-toolkit but by anthing other that is
different between testing and unstable. Also the error message doesn't
sound like prompt-
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2023 09:19:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1041254: fixed in docker.io 20.10.25+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1041254,
regarding docker.io: FTBFS: test failures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing control commands:
> close -1 1.74.3-1
Bug #1041306 [src:gjs] src:gjs: fails to migrate to testing for too long:
autopkgtest regression
Marked as fixed in versions gjs/1.74.3-1.
Bug #1041306 [src:gjs] src:gjs: fails to migrate to testing for too long:
autopkgtest regression
Marked Bug
Source: gjs
Version: 1.74.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.74.3-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1040053
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable f
Source: pmix
Version: 4.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 5.0.0~rc1-2
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Processing control commands:
> close -1 5.0.0~rc1-2
Bug #1041305 [src:pmix] src:pmix: fails to migrate to testing for too long:
FTBFS on mipsel
Marked as fixed in versions pmix/5.0.0~rc1-2.
Bug #1041305 [src:pmix] src:pmix: fails to migrate to testing for too long:
FTBFS on mipsel
Marked Bug as
Hi,
On 17-07-2023 09:26, Paul Gevers wrote:
apt-cache showsrc gcc-12 | awk '/^Package-List:/ { show=1; next } (/^
/ && show==1) { print $1; next } { show=0 }' |sort -u | tr '\n' ' '
This comes from lib/adt_testbed.py (around line 1305). I had a tiny
discussion with julian on IRC, he suggests
Hi!
Helmut Grohne wrote:
> rawloader contains multiple undeclared file conflicts
>
> usr/bin/identify is contained in graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat.
Please note that /usr/bin/identify is also included in
imagemagick-6.q16 and imagemagick-6.q16hdri and is handled by
update-alternatives by the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1041162 autopkgtest should ignore ESO entries for pinning
Bug #1041162 [autopkgtest] bogus test triggers with unused compilers
Changed Bug title to 'autopkgtest should ignore ESO entries for pinning' from
'bogus test triggers with unused
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 autopkgtest
Bug #1041162 [src:dkms] bogus test triggers with unused compilers
Bug reassigned from package 'src:dkms' to 'autopkgtest'.
No longer marked as found in versions dkms/3.0.11-3.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1041162 to the sam
Control: reassign -1 autopkgtest
Control: affects -1 src:dkms
Hi,
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 01:15:04 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
That's an autopkgtest pinning problem:
autopkgtest uses this command to build the list of binary packages to
pin for these flags:
--add-apt-release=unstable --pin-
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2023 08:41:15 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1037810: opm-upscaling: ftbfs with GCC-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #1037810,
regarding opm-upscaling: ftbfs with GCC-13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Hi Dima,
Le vendredi 14 juillet 2023 à 10:08 -0700, Dima Kogan a écrit :
> Hello. Thank you for the report. This is already fixed in the libdogleg
> upstream repo. I will push a new package when a new libdogleg is
> released or when the new suitesparse moves to unstable, whichever comes first.
Th
Hi,
do you have any of the "libheif-plugin-*" packages installed with
1.16.2?
Could be a duplicate of https://bugs.debian.org/1040520
Best regards,
Joachim
On 16.07.23 14:25, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Package: libheif1
Version: 1.16.2-1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders packa
72 matches
Mail list logo
