Processing control commands:
> severity -1 minor
Bug #1035933 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-8-amd64-unsigned: fails to build
(llvm-strip not found, missing dependency?)
Severity set to 'minor' from 'serious'
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #1035933 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-8-amd64-unsigned: fails t
Control: severity -1 minor
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Claude,
given your information and that the package builds fine on the buildds I
downgrade this to minor and add a moreinfo tag.
Cheers Jochen
* Jochen Sprickerhof [2023-05-25 14:56]:
Thanks for the information. I don't see why it s
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:17:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036672: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1030764,
regarding Do not migrate to testing/bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:16:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036671: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1030762,
regarding Do not migrate to testing/bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:17:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036670: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1030760,
regarding Do not migrate to testing/bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:15:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036668: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1030761,
regarding Do not migrate to testing/bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:15:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036669: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1030759,
regarding Do not migrate to testing/bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:14:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036667: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1030763,
regarding Do not migrate to testing/bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:11:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036344: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965473,
regarding cowbell: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:11:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036337: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #999093,
regarding sgml2x: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:10:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036336: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #971136,
regarding sqsh: FTBFS: cmd_connect.c:1906:17: error: ‘CS_MAX_CHAR’ undeclared
(first use in this function); did you mean ‘CS_
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:09:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036332: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #999004,
regarding smbc: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:09:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036332: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965824,
regarding smbc: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:11:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036337: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965818,
regarding sgml2x: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:09:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036332: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #957817,
regarding smbc: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:10:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036333: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #857299,
regarding libsnmpkit2c2a:ppc64el is an empty package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:10:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036333: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026441,
regarding snmpkit: FTBFS due to ISO C++17 standard
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:09:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036330: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #999192,
regarding sac: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:09:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036330: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965807,
regarding sac: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:08:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036329: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965801,
regarding resample: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:08:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036328: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #999161,
regarding remem: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:08:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036328: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965797,
regarding remem: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:07:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036327: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #999140,
regarding portreserve: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:07:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036327: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965783,
regarding portreserve: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:07:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036325: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #999151,
regarding drac: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:07:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036325: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #997205,
regarding drac: FTBFS: drac.h:9:10: fatal error: rpc/rpc.h: No such file or
directory
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:07:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036326: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965725,
regarding mkelfimage: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:07:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036325: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965495,
regarding drac: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:05:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036322: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #999179,
regarding swac-get: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:05:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036320: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965840,
regarding tclgeoip: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:05:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036322: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965831,
regarding swac-get: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:06:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036323: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035285,
regarding bit-babbler: missing Depends: adduser
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:06:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036323: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016260,
regarding bit-babbler: FTBFS: ../include/bit-babbler/impl/log.h:169:27: error:
‘CLOCK_REALTIME’ was not declared in this sco
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:06:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036324: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1004784,
regarding aiscm: FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:05:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036320: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #999097,
regarding tclgeoip: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:04:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036316: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #999060,
regarding vrrpd: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:04:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036318: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #999058,
regarding towitoko: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:04:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036316: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #965871,
regarding vrrpd: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:04:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036318: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #903940,
regarding Integer overflow on buffer sizes causes complete failure of driver
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:04:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036318: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #903937,
regarding /etc/reader.conf.d/libtowitoko2 causes driver failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:03:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1028323: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #872495,
regarding vdr-plugin-remoteosd FTBFS with vdr 2.3.8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 05:03:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1028321: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #872487,
regarding vdr-plugin-infosatepg FTBFS with vdr 2.3.8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2023 03:35:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036737: fixed in soapysdr 0.8.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036737,
regarding libsoapysdr0.8: please add Breaks: libsoapysdr0.7 for smoother
upgrades from bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means t
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 10:18:50PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: tony mancill
> > In any event, I think the change is good and am planning to upload,
> > provided there are no concerns from the Debian Hams.
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Christoph
Thank you Christoph. I should have run lintian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 1034824 with 1036798
Bug #1034824 [src:tomcat9] tomcat9 should not be released with Bookworm
1034824 was blocked by: 1031816 1034855 1033366 1036250
1034824 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1034824: 1036798
> thanks
Stoppi
Hi,
I'm ready to help to keep asterisk in the Debian project.
At this time I'm compiling from scratch on each new version (18 as well
as 20), I know nothing about creating packages but able to understand
the mechanism with a little help.
I'm too on community list.
Regards
--
Daniel
Re: tony mancill
> In any event, I think the change is good and am planning to upload,
> provided there are no concerns from the Debian Hams.
Looks good to me.
Christoph
Hi !
Le mercredi 12 avril 2023, 13:25:06 CEST Andreas Henriksson a écrit :
> Hello again,
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 01:19:52PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 09:37:27AM +0200, bi...@debian.org wrote:
> >
> > > It seems that your package drkonqi is shipping files (.
Thanks for the explanation.
I am indeed interested in finding out what would be involved / required /
expected in order to help keep Asterisk as a package in a future release of
Debian Stable - and in the meantime, to ensure that it remains available in
Backports.
I have asked on the Asterisk
Am Freitag, dem 26.05.2023 um 21:44 +0200 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
>
> The changes to jetty9 have to be reverted too, the package is broken
> (#1036798).
>
> Sadly we can't do without tomcat9. The path forward implies packaging
> Jetty 11 or 12 first and migrating all the reverse dependencies, bu
Hi,
I have just rebuilt all reverse-dependencies of closure-compiler again,
ckbuilder and ckeditor also build fine now. Thus the upload of ckbuilder
2.4.3+dfsg-2 was successful.
> Should we clone this bug to ensure we have a proper (tracking) solution
> after the bookworm release. If binaries n
Hi,
On 26-05-2023 21:34, Markus Koschany wrote:
Do I understand you correctly, that we only ship libtomcat9-java in Bookworm
now? Shall I upload a new revision of tomcat9 too?
Yes and yes.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Le 2023-05-26 21:14, Paul Gevers a écrit :
I have just added removal hints for tomcatjss and dogtag-pki. As
mentioned in my previous message, I want the changes in logback
reverted. You can do the reduced upload of tomcat9.
Markus, can you please revert you logback change by tomorrow at the
la
Hi,
> Markus, can you please revert you logback change by tomorrow at the latest?
Sure. I will take care if it.
Do I understand you correctly, that we only ship libtomcat9-java in Bookworm
now? Shall I upload a new revision of tomcat9 too?
Regards,
Markus
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Your message dated Fri, 26 May 2023 19:33:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1035865: fixed in ignition-physics 5.1.0+ds1-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035865,
regarding libignition-physics-dev: missing Depends:
libignition-physics5-bullet-plugin5 (= ${binary:Version})
to be m
Hi Andrej,
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 08:51:13PM +0200, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 26 May 2023, at 19:28, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > I believe matrix-synapse is still in the same status as for #982991
> > back for the bullseye release, and not suitable to be included in
> > bookwor
Hi,
On 26-05-2023 10:58, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Can't we just do the pragmatic fix of updating src:tomcat9 to only ship
libtomcat9-java and libtomcat9-embed-java? The maintenance burden for
security updates lies within the server stack, the percentage of issues
affecting the libtomcat9-java b
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 09:52:55PM +0200, Gürkan Myczko wrote:
> On 25.05.2023 19:47, Martin Hostettler wrote:
> > On 19/05/2023 12.48, Martin Hostettler wrote:
> > > It seems what is needed is this:
> > >
> > > mv
> > > debian/cadabra2/usr/lib/python3.*/site-packages/notebook/static/componen
Hi,
On Fri, 26 May 2023, at 19:28, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> I believe matrix-synapse is still in the same status as for #982991
> back for the bullseye release, and not suitable to be included in
> bookworm as stable release.
In fact, I believe the situation has changed. Synapse it much more
Since Debian 12 entered in full freeze, I guess this issue will stay
open for the entirety of Bookwork lifetime?
Source: matrix-synapse
Version: 1.78.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream security
X-Debbugs-Cc: Andrej Shadura ,
debian-rele...@lists.debian.org, car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi Andrej,
I believe matrix-synapse is still in the same status as for #982991
back for the bullseye releas
I filed now
https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/mariadb-server/-/merge_requests/47
as an exploration to fix this issue.
If we don't fix this in 10.11 the alternative would be to patch 10.5
and 10.3 to simply never fail on missing mariadb-client-10.3/5
package. I already did
https://salsa.debian
Your message dated Fri, 26 May 2023 16:18:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#861040: fixed in camping 2.3-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #861040,
regarding camping: broken symlink:
/usr/share/doc/camping/rdoc/fonts/Lato-RegularItalic.ttf ->
../../../../fonts/truetype/lato/Lato-R
Hi Antony,
Quoting Antony Stone (2023-05-26 16:58:54)
> I've just discovered this "bug report" and I'm very disappointed by it.
>
> Please can someone tell me:
>
> 1. How many people are involved as Asterisk Debian Package Maintainers?
Asterisk is maintained in the [VoIP team], and in principle
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1036800
Bug #1036800 [sylpheed] sylpheed: unable to send or read email after upgrading
to Debian 12
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1036800: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
Package: sylpheed
Version: 3.8.0~beta1-1
Severity: grave
After upgrading to Debian 12 and booting again the computer I am
unable to use sylpheed to neither send email with both accounts I have
set up, nor read new messages, just with the IMAP one in this case.
Both accounts are from Gmail.
The e
Package: sylpheed
Version: 3.8.0~beta1-1
Severity: grave
After upgrading to Debian 12 and booting again the computer I am unable to
use sylpheed to neither send email with both accounts I have set up, nor
read new messages, just with the IMAP one in this case.
Both accounts are from Gmail.
The e
Package: jetty9
Version: 9.4.50-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The jetty9 package can no longer run web applications after switching
to libtomcat10-java for the JSP compiler. The following error appears
in the log:
java.util.ServiceConfigurationError:
javax.servlet.S
Your message dated Fri, 26 May 2023 15:18:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1031798: fixed in libsepol 3.4-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1031798,
regarding libsepol: Inaccurate copyright file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I've just discovered this "bug report" and I'm very disappointed by it.
Please can someone tell me:
1. How many people are involved as Asterisk Debian Package Maintainers?
2. Has this number decreased noticeably since the previous Debian release
Bullseye?
3. Has anyone contacted the Asterisk c
Your message dated Fri, 26 May 2023 14:49:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1035691: fixed in python-aiosmtpd 1.4.3-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035691,
regarding python3-aiosmtpd: unhandled symlink to directory conversion:
/usr/share/doc/python3-aiosmtpd/html/_sources -> ..
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1036794 serious
Bug #1036794 [src:rust-pangocairo] rust-pangocairo: 0.16.3 autopkgtest due to
implicit test dependency on newer gir-format-check
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> tags 1036794 +pending
Bug #1036794 [src:rust-pango
Your message dated Fri, 26 May 2023 14:13:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1035631: fixed in curlpp 0.8.1-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035631,
regarding libcurlpp-dev: unhandled symlink to directory conversion:
/usr/share/doc/PACKAGE
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1036791 + sid bookworm
Bug #1036791 [debian-security-support] tomcat9 should not be released with
Bookworm
Added tag(s) bookworm and sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1036791: https://bugs
Hi,
Le jeudi 25 mai 2023 à 16:25:30+0200, Andreas Beckmann a écrit :
> Followup-For: Bug #1035691
> Control: tag -1 patch pending
>
> I've uploaded a verified fix to DELAYED/1 to reach the bookworm deadline.
Could you upload the patch on salsa (branch=master)?
Otherwise may I apply in your name
Your message dated Fri, 26 May 2023 11:48:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036584: fixed in openjpeg2 2.5.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036584,
regarding libopenjpip-viewer is basically empty
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
On Sun, 14 May 2023 15:21:24 -0400, Ted wrote:
> On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 06:03:59PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > > Please reassign it there together with instructions how to fix it, i.e.
> > > what should be done in the maintainer scripts.
>
> Can someone send the instructions on how to fix this
On 26/05/2023 05.01, Steven Robbins wrote:
fonts-urw-base35 does not provide the old "numeric" font names
gsfonts-x11 had.
Thanks for this. Do you happen to know of a package that does ship those
fonts, even if a different name?
That should be fonts-urw-base35, at least that's what the trans
close 1036163
thanks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1036163
Bug #1036163 [fcitx5-zhuyin] failed.mmap /usr/share/fcitx5/zhuyin/gb_char.bin
failed
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1036163: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre
Your message dated Fri, 26 May 2023 10:04:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1035677: fixed in sane-backends 1.2.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1035677,
regarding sane-utils: preinst deletes file owned by libsane-common:
/usr/share/man/man5/sane-umax_pp.5.gz
to be marked as done
Your message dated Fri, 26 May 2023 09:49:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036249: fixed in closure-compiler 20130227+rhino-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036249,
regarding ckeditor: FTBFS in testing: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:24:
debian/builddir/core/ckeditor_base.min.js] Er
Your message dated Fri, 26 May 2023 09:49:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036249: fixed in closure-compiler 20130227+rhino-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036249,
regarding datatables-extensions: FTBFS in testing: make[1]: ***
[debian/rules:10: override_dh_install] Error 254
t
Your message dated Fri, 26 May 2023 09:49:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036249: fixed in closure-compiler 20130227+rhino-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036249,
regarding mediaelement: FTBFS in testing: FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such
file or directory: '../build/mediae
Your message dated Fri, 26 May 2023 09:49:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036249: fixed in closure-compiler 20130227+rhino-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036249,
regarding jquery-i18n-properties: FTBFS in testing: make[1]: ***
[debian/rules:15: override_dh_auto_build] Error 2
Your message dated Fri, 26 May 2023 09:49:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036249: fixed in closure-compiler 20130227+rhino-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036249,
regarding request-tracker5: FTBFS in testing: make: *** [debian/rules:36:
build-stamp] Error 1
to be marked as don
Your message dated Fri, 26 May 2023 09:49:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036249: fixed in closure-compiler 20130227+rhino-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036249,
regarding request-tracker5: fails to build at build-final-ckeditor.sh stage
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Fri, 26 May 2023 09:49:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1036249: fixed in closure-compiler 20130227+rhino-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1036249,
regarding prettify.js: FTBFS in testing: make[2]: *** [Makefile:40:
distrib.tstamp] Error 254
to be marked as done
hey all,
I was involved with a discussion on site here in Hamburg with Paul
about it.
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 10:58:48AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 12:10:18AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> > First of all trapperkeeper-webserver-jetty9-clojure should add a build-
Le 22/05/2023 à 18:27, Markus Koschany a écrit :
Can you think of a simpler solution for this problem?
I'll get a look. Intuitively I think that if no Tomcat internals are
used, the javax.servlet classes should still be used since Tomcat 10
works with both javax and jakarta namespaces.
If
Le 26/05/2023 à 10:58, Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit :
Can't we just do the pragmatic fix of updating src:tomcat9 to only ship
libtomcat9-java and libtomcat9-embed-java? The maintenance burden for
security updates lies within the server stack, the percentage of issues
affecting the libtomcat9-java
Hi Markus,
On 25-05-2023 23:47, Markus Koschany wrote:
Since I could not find a targeted fix I decided to remove the dependency on
rhino 1.7.14 and embedded rhino 1.7.7.2 instead, the last version that worked
well for closure-compiler.
I have rebuilt all reverse-dependencies and this would re
Le jeu. 25 mai 2023, 19:15, Andreas Metzler a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> if you have not got time for an upload I can look into it.
>
Yes please ! Thanks very much
> cu Andreas
>
>
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 12:10:18AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> First of all trapperkeeper-webserver-jetty9-clojure should add a build-
> dependency on logback to detect such regressions in advance.
>
> #1036250 is mainly a logback problem, not a tomcat problem. I still would like
> to hear Emm
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 1036163 5.0.11-1+b1
Bug #1036163 [fcitx5-zhuyin] failed.mmap /usr/share/fcitx5/zhuyin/gb_char.bin
failed
Marked as fixed in versions fcitx5-zhuyin/5.0.11-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1021962 1.8.1-3
Bug #1021962 [xfce4-notes-plugin] xfce4-notes-plugin: Missing from sid, testing
and stable since before bullseye was even released
Marked as found in versions xfce4-notes-plugin/1.8.1-3.
> found 1035933 6.1.25-1
Bug #1035933
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2 -3
Bug #1034824 [src:tomcat9] tomcat9 should not be released with Bookworm
Bug 1034824 cloned as bugs 1036790-1036791
1036790 was blocked by: 1031816 1034855 1033366 1036250
1036790 was not blocking any bugs.
Ignoring request to alter blocking bugs of bug
Control: clone -1 -2 -3
Control: reassign -2 release-notes
Control: reassign -3 debian-security-support
Control: tag -1 bookworm-ignore
Hi,
On 26-05-2023 00:10, Markus Koschany wrote:
#1036250 is mainly a logback problem, not a tomcat problem. I still would like
to hear Emmanuel's opinion. We s
Package: libpython3.12-testsuite
Version: 3.12.0~b1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the seve
99 matches
Mail list logo
