Package: libunwind-13
Version: 1:13.0.1-7
Severity: grave
LLVM libunwind and libgcc_s.so export the same unwinding functions.
$ objdump -T libgcc_s.so.1 | grep _Unwind_GetLanguageSpecificData
00014a00 gDF .text 000c GCC_3.0
_Unwind_GetLanguageSpecificData
$ objdump -T l
Source: lxc
Version: 1:5.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gl...@lists.debian.org
lxc fails to build from source in unstable. It seems very likely that
this is due to glibc 2.36. A non-parallel build log fails as follows:
| [24/4015] cc -Isrc/lxc/liblxc_static.a.p -Isrc/lxc
Package: ltrace
Version: 0.7.3-6.3
Severity: grave
Hi,
running ltrace on mipsel, I get:
$ ltrace echo
unexpected breakpoint at 0x77e74ef8
unexpected breakpoint at 0x77e74ef8
unexpected breakpoint at 0x77e74ee8
unexpected breakpoint at 0x77e74ee8
unexpected breakpoint at 0x77e74ef8
unexpected bre
Your message dated Fri, 04 Nov 2022 04:19:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#999331: fixed in cl-pubmed 2.1.3-5.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #999331,
regarding cl-pubmed: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Fri, 04 Nov 2022 04:20:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#999165: fixed in cl-umlisp-orf 3.3.2-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #999165,
regarding cl-umlisp-orf: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch
and/or build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Fri, 04 Nov 2022 04:19:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#999012: fixed in cl-photo 0.14-4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #999012,
regarding cl-photo: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Fri, 04 Nov 2022 04:20:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#998971: fixed in cl-xlunit 0.6.3-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #998971,
regarding cl-xlunit: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Fri, 04 Nov 2022 04:19:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#998994: fixed in cl-pipes 1.2.1-5.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #998994,
regarding cl-pipes: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Fri, 04 Nov 2022 04:19:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#998990: fixed in cl-lml2 1.6.6-4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #998990,
regarding cl-lml2: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Your message dated Fri, 04 Nov 2022 04:19:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#998973: fixed in cl-pg 1:20061216-6.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #998973,
regarding cl-pg: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Fri, 04 Nov 2022 04:20:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#998959: fixed in cl-xptest 1.2.4-3.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #998959,
regarding cl-xptest: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Fri, 04 Nov 2022 04:19:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#998947: fixed in cl-modlisp 0.6-7.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #998947,
regarding cl-modlisp: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Fri, 04 Nov 2022 04:20:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#998935: fixed in cl-umlisp 1:2007ac.2-6.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #998935,
regarding cl-umlisp: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Fri, 04 Nov 2022 04:04:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#999079: fixed in cl-irc-logger 0.9.4-3.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #999079,
regarding cl-irc-logger: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch
and/or build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Fri, 04 Nov 2022 04:04:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#999045: fixed in cl-lml 2.5.7-4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #999045,
regarding cl-lml: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1023318 + pending
Bug #1023318 [src:screen] screen: re-adds /usr/bin/screen to /etc/shells on
upgrade
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1023318: https://bugs.debian.org/cg
Your message dated Fri, 04 Nov 2022 01:34:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1023175: fixed in dino-im 0.3.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023175,
regarding dino-im: Fails to start: Using libsoup2 and libsoup3 in the same
process is not supported
to be marked as done.
This mean
I experienced this problem on a machine with the following
hardware:
CPU: AMD FX-8350 (8) @ 4.000GHz
GPU: AMD ATI Radeon R7 370 / R9 270/370 OEM
After bisecting from the 5.10.149 sources, I found that the commit
responsible for this bug was
867b2b2b6802fb3995a0065fc39e0e7e20d8004d, corresponding
Your message dated Thu, 03 Nov 2022 23:50:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#999166: fixed in snmptrapfmt 1.18
has caused the Debian Bug report #999166,
regarding snmptrapfmt: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Thu, 03 Nov 2022 23:50:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#999080: fixed in stymulator 0.21a~dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #999080,
regarding stymulator: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Thu, 03 Nov 2022 23:35:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#999304: fixed in quickml 0.7-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #999304,
regarding quickml: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Thu, 03 Nov 2022 23:34:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#967987: fixed in fuzz 0.6-19.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #967987,
regarding fuzz: Removal of sys_errlist
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Processing control commands:
> tags 999056 + patch
Bug #999056 [src:xwatch] xwatch: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 999056 + pending
Bug #999056 [src:xwatch] xwatch: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Control: tags 999056 + patch
Control: tags 999056 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for xwatch (versioned as 2.11-16.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru xwatch-2.11/debian/changelog xwatch-2.11/debian/changel
Processing control commands:
> tags 999086 + patch
Bug #999086 [src:xpuzzles] xpuzzles: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 999086 + pending
Bug #999086 [src:xpuzzles] xpuzzles: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or bui
Control: tags 999086 + patch
Control: tags 999086 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for xpuzzles (versioned as 7.7.1-1.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru xpuzzles-7.7.1/debian/changelog xpuzzles-7.7.1/debian
Control: tags 999137 + patch
Control: tags 999137 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for sredird (versioned as 2.2.1-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru sredird-2.2.1/debian/changelog sredird-2.2.1/debian/ch
Processing control commands:
> tags 999137 + patch
Bug #999137 [src:sredird] sredird: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 999137 + pending
Bug #999137 [src:sredird] sredird: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-i
On Thursday, 3 November 2022 22:18:53 CET Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> >From the cover letter in the series:
> > The first patch will fix this, and the second will make sure we avoid that
> > situation entirely in the future. This has been tested with 5.19.12.
> > Earlier versions might need a bac
Control: tags 999026 + patch
Control: tags 999026 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for sjeng (versioned as 11.2-8.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u sjeng-11.2/debian/changelog sjeng-11.2/debian/changelog
---
Processing control commands:
> tags 999026 + patch
Bug #999026 [src:sjeng] sjeng: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch
and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 999026 + pending
Bug #999026 [src:sjeng] sjeng: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch
and/or build-indep
Add
Processing control commands:
> tags 999294 + patch
Bug #999294 [src:sisc] sisc: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch
and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 999294 + pending
Bug #999294 [src:sisc] sisc: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch
and/or build-indep
Added t
Control: tags 999294 + patch
Control: tags 999294 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for sisc (versioned as 1.16.6-1.3) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru sisc-1.16.6/debian/changelog sisc-1.16.6/debian/changelo
Processing control commands:
> tags 999293 + patch
Bug #999293 [src:proj-ps-doc] proj-ps-doc: missing required debian/rules
targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 999293 + pending
Bug #999293 [src:proj-ps-doc] proj-ps-doc: missing required debian/rules
targets build-arc
Control: tags 999293 + patch
Control: tags 999293 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for proj-ps-doc (versioned as 4.3.3-5.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u proj-ps-doc-4.3.3/debian/changelog proj-ps-doc-4.3.3
Processing control commands:
> tags 999239 + patch
Bug #999239 [src:pct-scanner-scripts] pct-scanner-scripts: missing required
debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 999239 + pending
Bug #999239 [src:pct-scanner-scripts] pct-scanner-scripts: missing required
Control: tags 999239 + patch
Control: tags 999239 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for pct-scanner-scripts (versioned as 0.0.4-3.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u pct-scanner-scripts-0.0.4/debian/changelog p
Processing control commands:
> tags 998932 + patch
Bug #998932 [src:pentium-builder] pentium-builder: missing required
debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 998932 + pending
Bug #998932 [src:pentium-builder] pentium-builder: missing required
debian/rules t
Control: tags 998932 + patch
Control: tags 998932 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for pentium-builder (versioned as 0.21+nmu2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru pentium-builder-0.21+nmu1/debian/changelog pen
Processing control commands:
> tags 1023427 + patch
Bug #1023427 [src:pixman] pixman: CVE-2022-44638
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 1023427 + pending
Bug #1023427 [src:pixman] pixman: CVE-2022-44638
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1023427: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023427
Debian Bu
Control: tags 1023427 + patch
Control: tags 1023427 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for pixman (versioned as 0.40.0-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards,
Salvatore
diff -u pixman-0.40.0/debian/changelog pixman-0.40.0
Processing control commands:
> tags 998968 + patch
Bug #998968 [src:openoffice.org-thesaurus-pl] openoffice.org-thesaurus-pl:
missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 998968 + pending
Bug #998968 [src:openoffice.org-thesaurus-pl] openoffice.or
Control: tags 998968 + patch
Control: tags 998968 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for openoffice.org-thesaurus-pl (versioned as 1.5-4.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u openoffice.org-thesaurus-pl-1.5/debian
Control: tags 998969 + patch
Control: tags 998969 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ninvaders (versioned as 0.1.1-4.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u ninvaders-0.1.1/debian/changelog ninvaders-0.1.1/debia
Control: tags 999193 + patch
Control: tags 999193 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for openoffice.org-hyphenation-pl (versioned as
1:3.0a-4.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u openoffice.org-hyphenation-pl-3.
Processing control commands:
> tags 999193 + patch
Bug #999193 [src:openoffice.org-hyphenation-pl] openoffice.org-hyphenation-pl:
missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 999193 + pending
Bug #999193 [src:openoffice.org-hyphenation-pl] openoff
Processing control commands:
> tags 998969 + patch
Bug #998969 [src:ninvaders] ninvaders: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 998969 + pending
Bug #998969 [src:ninvaders] ninvaders: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or
Processing control commands:
> tags 999062 + patch
Bug #999062 [src:netmaze] netmaze: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 999062 + pending
Bug #999062 [src:netmaze] netmaze: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-i
Control: tags 999062 + patch
Control: tags 999062 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for netmaze (versioned as 0.81+jpg0.82-16.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u netmaze-0.81+jpg0.82/debian/changelog netmaze-0.
Processing control commands:
> tags 999285 + patch
Bug #999285 [src:net-telnet-cisco] net-telnet-cisco: missing required
debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 999285 + pending
Bug #999285 [src:net-telnet-cisco] net-telnet-cisco: missing required
debian/rul
Control: tags 999285 + patch
Control: tags 999285 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for net-telnet-cisco (versioned as 1.10-5.4) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u net-telnet-cisco-1.10/debian/changelog net-telne
Control: tags 999123 + patch
Control: tags 999123 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for minisapserver (versioned as 0.3.6-1.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u minisapserver-0.3.6/debian/changelog minisapserver
Processing control commands:
> tags 999123 + patch
Bug #999123 [src:minisapserver] minisapserver: missing required debian/rules
targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 999123 + pending
Bug #999123 [src:minisapserver] minisapserver: missing required debian/rules
targets b
Control: tags 999328 + patch
Control: tags 999328 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for mbw (versioned as 1.2.2-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u mbw-1.2.2/debian/rules mbw-1.2.2/debian/rules
--- mbw-1.2.2/
Processing control commands:
> tags 999328 + patch
Bug #999328 [src:mbw] mbw: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch
and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 999328 + pending
Bug #999328 [src:mbw] mbw: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch
and/or build-indep
Added tag(s
Processing control commands:
> tags 999244 + patch
Bug #999244 [src:midish] midish: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 999244 + pending
Bug #999244 [src:midish] midish: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Control: tags 999244 + patch
Control: tags 999244 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for midish (versioned as 1.0.4-1.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru midish-1.0.4/debian/changelog midish-1.0.4/debian/chang
Control: tags 998950 + patch
Control: tags 998950 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for mailsync (versioned as 5.2.7-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru mailsync-5.2.7/debian/changelog mailsync-5.2.7/debian
Your message dated Thu, 3 Nov 2022 22:41:34 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Closing bug 1011977 : htsjdk builds against OpenJDK17
has caused the Debian Bug report #1011977,
regarding FTBFS with OpenJDK 17: 5 failing tests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing control commands:
> tags 998950 + patch
Bug #998950 [src:mailsync] mailsync: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 998950 + pending
Bug #998950 [src:mailsync] mailsync: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or bui
Source: pixman
Version: 0.40.0-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
Forwarded: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pixman/pixman/-/issues/63
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for pixman.
CVE-2022
Your message dated Thu, 03 Nov 2022 21:35:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1023041: fixed in openscap 1.3.6+dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023041,
regarding FTBFS: uninstalled files; dh_missing errors out
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 03 Nov 2022 21:34:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1023266: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022511,
regarding stsci.distutils: FTBFS: error in setup command: use_2to3 is invalid.
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #1021125 [src:soci] soci: ABI break in soci::session causes crashes in
Linphone
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
--
1021125: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021125
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.d
Eli Zaretskii writes:
>> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 11:13:08 +0100
>> From: Vincent Lefevre
>> Cc: spwhit...@spwhitton.name, 58...@debbugs.gnu.org,
>> 1017...@bugs.debian.org
>>
>> On 2022-11-03 08:47:06 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> > > On 2022-11-02 14:24:51 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> >
Processing control commands:
> tags 999230 + patch
Bug #999230 [src:madwimax] madwimax: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 999230 + pending
Bug #999230 [src:madwimax] madwimax: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or bui
Control: tags 999230 + patch
Control: tags 999230 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for madwimax (versioned as 0.1.1-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u madwimax-0.1.1/debian/rules madwimax-0.1.1/debian/rules
Control: severity -1 important
I'm downgrading this for now since the relinked reverse-dependencies
have migrated to testing making this less urgent. But this still
needs addressing for bookworm so no one upgrading from bullseye will
think they can do a partial upgrade.
Regards.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1023417 src:devscripts
Bug #1023417 [devscripts] FTBFS: setuptools vs distutils
Bug reassigned from package 'devscripts' to 'src:devscripts'.
No longer marked as found in versions devscripts/2.22.2.
Ignoring request to alter fixed version
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1023123 serious
Bug #1023123 {Done: Salvatore Bonaccorso } [src:linux] RPi
0-3 fail to boot on kernel 5.19+ without HDMI connected
Severity set to 'serious' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 1020973 1023417
Bug #1020973 [src:devscripts] FTBFS: distutils.errors.DistutilsClassError:
command class [...] must subclass Command
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #1023417 is 'devscripts' not 'src:devscripts'
Failed to forci
close 1023123 6.0.6-1
thanks
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + pending
Bug #1023178 [src:microprofile] microprofile: Contains non-free source
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1023178: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023178
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1023123 6.0.6-1
Bug #1023123 [src:linux] RPi 0-3 fail to boot on kernel 5.19+ without HDMI
connected
Marked as fixed in versions linux/6.0.6-1.
Bug #1023123 [src:linux] RPi 0-3 fail to boot on kernel 5.19+ without HDMI
connected
Marked Bug
Control: tag -1 + pending
I've just fixed the mentioned issues and uploaded the package to
mentors.
Hi Diederik!
On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 12:37:19PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Control: found -1 6.0.5-1
> Control: fixed -1 6.0.6-2
> Control: fixed -1 6.1~rc3-1~exp1
> Control: severity -1 grave
> Control: tag -1 -moreinfo
> Control: tag -1 upstream fixed-upstream
> Control: retitle -1 RPi 0-3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1023298 + pending
Bug #1023298 [src:linux] linux: FTBFS on arm64 and armhf (ABI changes)
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1023298: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor
On Thu, 03 Nov 2022 20:52:21 + Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
> Source: pysubnettree
> Source-Version: 0.36-1
> Done: Scott Kitterman
>
> We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
> pysubnettree, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
>
> A summary
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #1023424 [openssl] Vulnerabilities CVE-2022-1292, CVE-2022-2068,
CVE-2022-2097
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
> tags -1 - bullseye
Bug #1023424 [openssl] Vulnerabilities CVE-2022-1292, CVE-2022-2068,
CVE-2022-2097
Removed tag(
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 - bullseye
On Thu, 2022-11-03 at 20:35 +, nospam099-git...@yahoo.com wrote:
> The component OpenSSL1.1.1n-0+deb11u3 suffers from 3 vulnerabilities:
> * (CVE-2022-1292)[https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1292]
> (critical)
> * (CVE-
Hi Helmut,
Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 12:26:18AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Some more hints about how this all is meant to work and why it
> > actually works would have been appreciated, though:
>
> Thank you for the quick reply and thank you for bringing up the lack of
>
Your message dated Thu, 03 Nov 2022 20:52:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1005044: fixed in pysubnettree 0.36-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005044,
regarding python3-subnettree: package completely broken, module won't load
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Control: close -1Please read the Debian change logs and use security tracker rather than blindly using upstream version number for assessing the status of security vulnerabilities in stable Debian release:. The information you are looking for can be found there:Information on source package openssl
Package: OpenSSL
Version: 1.1.1n-0+deb11u3
Severity: critical
Tags: bullseye security fixed-upstream
Description:
The component OpenSSL1.1.1n-0+deb11u3 suffers from 3 vulnerabilities:
* (CVE-2022-1292)[https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1292] (critical)
* (CVE-2022-2068)[https://nvd
Hi,
On 03-11-2022 18:03, Andreas Tille wrote:
its all about the fact that rdflib is broken and removed from testing.
We are nagging upstream constantly[1] with no success so far. This
issue creates noise about testing removals in about 100 packages and
is extremely annoying.
&&
On 03-11-2022 1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1005044 + pending
Bug #1005044 [python3-subnettree] python3-subnettree: package completely
broken, module won't load
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1005044: https://bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1023422 + bookworm sid
Bug #1023422 [src:minilla] FTBFS: test failure
Added tag(s) bookworm and sid.
> notfound 1023422 3.1.11-1
Bug #1023422 [src:minilla] FTBFS: test failure
No longer marked as found in versions minilla/3.1.11-1.
> found 10
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1023421 + bookworm sid
Bug #1023421 [src:libdancer-perl] FTBFS: test failure in
t/12_response/10_error_dumper_without_clone.t
Added tag(s) bookworm and sid.
> notfound 1023421 1.3202+dfsg-1
Bug #1023421 [src:libdancer-perl] FTBFS: test failu
Source: minilla
Version: 3.1.11-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
As also seen on ci.debian.net, minilla recently started to fail its
test suite, which also makes it FTBFS:
# Failed test 'No tests run for
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1023041 [openscap] FTBFS: uninstalled files; dh_missing errors out
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
1023041: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023041
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit
Source: libdancer-perl
Version: 1.3202+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
libdancer-perl doesn't build anymore, one test fails (also seen on
ci.debian.net and cpantesters):
Devel::Hide hides Clone.pm
Can'
Processing control commands:
> tags 999142 + patch
Bug #999142 [src:liblip] liblip: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 999142 + pending
Bug #999142 [src:liblip] liblip: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Control: tags 999142 + patch
Control: tags 999142 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for liblip (versioned as 2.0.0-1.3) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u liblip-2.0.0/debian/changelog liblip-2.0.0/debian/changel
Your message dated Thu, 03 Nov 2022 19:19:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#999280: fixed in empire-lafe 1.1-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #999280,
regarding empire-lafe: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or
build-indep
to be marked as done.
This means that
Processing control commands:
> tags 998986 + patch
Bug #998986 [src:libjpeg9] libjpeg9: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 998986 + pending
Bug #998986 [src:libjpeg9] libjpeg9: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or bui
Control: tags 998986 + patch
Control: tags 998986 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libjpeg9 (versioned as 1:9d-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru libjpeg9-9d/debian/changelog libjpeg9-9d/debian/change
Control: tags 999306 + patch
Control: tags 999306 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libjpeg6b (versioned as 1:6b2-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru libjpeg6b-6b2/debian/changelog libjpeg6b-6b2/debian/
Processing control commands:
> tags 999306 + patch
Bug #999306 [src:libjpeg6b] libjpeg6b: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 999306 + pending
Bug #999306 [src:libjpeg6b] libjpeg6b: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or
Source: libvirt
Version: 8.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
libvirt fails to build from source in unstable on a minimal chroot.
mount is no longer essential nor build-essential, so you must add it to
Build-Depends explicitly.
Helmut
Processing control commands:
> tags 998991 + patch
Bug #998991 [src:libapache-mod-removeip] libapache-mod-removeip: missing
required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 998991 + pending
Bug #998991 [src:libapache-mod-removeip] libapache-mod-removeip: miss
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
