Processing control commands:
> found -1 0.10.8-1
Bug #1018930 [src:pcs] pcs: CVE-2022-2735: Obtaining an authentication token
for hacluster user leads to privilege escalation
Marked as found in versions pcs/0.10.8-1.
--
1018930: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1018930
Debian B
Source: pcs
Version: 0.11.3-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Control: found -1 0.10.8-1
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for pcs.
CVE-2022-2735[0]:
| Obtaining an authentication token f
Le 02/09/2022 à 01:10, Guillem Jover a écrit :
Hi!
On Wed, 2022-08-10 at 01:29:27 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
[ The bug has been (correctly) bumped back to serious. Sorry that I
have not engaged about this bug in the past, but the reply to simply
ignore policy looked rather off-putting, I
Processing control commands:
> close -1 0.63.1-1
Bug #1018926 [src:meson] src:meson: fails to migrate to testing for too long:
unresolved RC bug
Marked as fixed in versions meson/0.63.1-1.
Bug #1018926 [src:meson] src:meson: fails to migrate to testing for too long:
unresolved RC bug
Marked Bug
Source: meson
Version: 0.62.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.63.1-1
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1017087
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstab
Source: hslogger
Version: 1.3.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.3.1.0+dfsg-1
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 60
Processing control commands:
> close -1 1.3.1.0+dfsg-1
Bug #1018925 [src:hslogger] src:hslogger: fails to migrate to testing for too
long: part of unfinshed ghc transition?
Marked as fixed in versions hslogger/1.3.1.0+dfsg-1.
Bug #1018925 [src:hslogger] src:hslogger: fails to migrate to testing f
Source: libgc
Version: 1:8.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Hi,
what happend to libgc? It ftbfs on all 32bit architectures and its
symbol handling is essentially stripped of all the architecture-specific
patterns that we have accumulated over the years.
The general quality of the upload seems
Package: kbibtex
Version: 0.9.90-1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Backtrace
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
[New Thread 0x7fffe5fff640 (LWP 150852)]
[New Thread 0x7fffe563b640 (LWP
Hi!
On Wed, 2022-08-10 at 01:29:27 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> [ The bug has been (correctly) bumped back to serious. Sorry that I
> have not engaged about this bug in the past, but the reply to simply
> ignore policy looked rather off-putting, I just noticed the reply
> below, which seeme
Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2022 23:05:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1017244: fixed in heimdal 7.7.0+dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1017244,
regarding heimdal: FTBFS: dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns
disappeared in the symbols file: see diff output bel
Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2022 23:05:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016884: fixed in heimdal 7.7.0+dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016884,
regarding heimdal: FTBFS with glibc >= 2.34
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2022 21:50:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#984030: fixed in d-itg 2.8.1-r1023-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #984030,
regarding d-itg: ftbfs with GCC-11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 10:42:08PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Source: siconos
> Version: 4.3.1+dfsg-2
> Severity: serious
> X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
> Tags: sid bookworm
> Control: block 1016597 by -1
> User: gl...@debian.org
> Usertags: vtk6_vtk7_removal
>
> Based on #1013156 an
Your message dated Thu, 1 Sep 2022 16:42:11 -0400
with message-id
and subject line Re: pangomm: FTBFS:
../untracked/pango/pangomm/attrlist.cc:38:20: error: ‘pango_parse_markup’ was
not declared in this scope
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005483,
regarding pangomm: FTBFS: ../untracked/pango
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1003045 libreoffice: Since testing update on Jan 2, 2022, libreoffice
> doesn't start.
Bug #1003045 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [libreoffice]
libreoffice: Since testing update on Jan 2, 2022,
Changed Bug title to 'libreoffice: Since testing
Your message dated Thu, 1 Sep 2022 17:30:12 -0300
with message-id <7e6a2eda-cf88-73b7-f189-974ed32be...@debian.org>
and subject line thin: FTBFS on s390x
has caused the Debian Bug report #1006994,
regarding thin: FTBFS on s390x
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Thu, 1 Sep 2022 22:27:14 +0200
with message-id <5da2324a-a096-4fb4-0b9d-90537fb83...@debian.org>
and subject line let's close this
has caused the Debian Bug report #1003045,
regarding libreoffice: Since testing update on Jan 2, 2022,
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 1003045 libreoffice: Since testing update on Jan 2, 2022,
Bug #1003045 [libreoffice] libreoffice: Since testing update on Jan 2, 2021,
libreoffice doesn't start.
Changed Bug title to 'libreoffice: Since testing update on Jan 2, 2022,' fro
On 2022-08-18 19:36:28 [+], Scott Kitterman wrote:
Hi Scott,
> I agree. It's been dead upstream for a long time. I think this is a
> logical point to put an end to trying to keep it alive in Debian.
nice to hear from you! Sorry for not replying earlier but I'm kind of
busy… Anyway, I manage
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # only introduced in 5.18.16-1 for unstable
> notfound 1017425 5.18.14-1
Bug #1017425 {Done: Salvatore Bonaccorso } [src:linux]
[i386] Unconditional LFENCE instructions in FILL_RETURN_BUFFER
Bug #1017494 {Done: Salvatore Bonaccorso } [src:linux]
This is a consequence of this bug filed against ruby-eventmachine:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998097
--
Lucas Kanashiro
This is now fixed in the salsa repository. Please, upload a new version.
--
Athos Ribeiro
Source: gconf-editor
Version: 3.0.1-6
Severity: serious
Tags: bookworm sid
gconf-editor was removed from Testing two and a half years ago.
Its only purpose is to enable editing gconf settings which are only
used by a very small number of packages and are functionally obsolete.
I remember that th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:passwordsafe
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.or
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:mkautodoc
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
S
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1018896 https://github.com/silnrsi/grcompiler/issues/45
Bug #1018896 [src:grcompiler] grcompiler: FTBFS on big endian
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/silnrsi/grcompiler/issues/45'.
>
End of message, stopping processi
Source: grcompiler
Version: 5.2.1-0.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: forwarded -1
grcompiler fails to build from scratch on big endian systems, including s390x,
because of test fails:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=grcompiler&arch=s390x&ver=5.2.1-0.1&stamp=1661942327
tes
Hi Helge,
[…]
> Yes, that would be the best option. A few days ago I informed all
> translation teams about the transfer of translations to sysvinit, so
> if the French team could integrate the translation of bootlogd there,
> that'll be great.
ok, great!
> For Debian, as stated above, I can d
Hello Thorsten,
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 06:39:18PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> […]
> > Yes, that would be the best option. A few days ago I informed all
> > translation teams about the transfer of translations to sysvinit, so
> > if the French team could integrate the translation of bootlogd t
Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2022 16:36:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016235: fixed in passwordsafe 1.15.0+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016235,
regarding passwordsafe: FTBFS: pws_time.cpp:30:10: error: ‘localtime_r’ was not
declared in this scope; did you mean ‘loc
Hello Torsten et al,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 11:04:25PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2022, Mark Hindley wrote:
>
> > > there seems to be one manpage (in bootlogd) missing conflict handling:
> > >
> > > /usr/share/man/fr/man8/bootlogd.8.gz
> >
> > Thanks. I was under the impress
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 06:03:41PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> This bug was reported against Stable. It cannot be considered as
> closed for as long as a new 5.10 kernel including the fix hasn't been
> published.
it very well can. The BTS can close a bug in multiple versions which
will
Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2022 15:35:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1017147: fixed in quvi 0.9.5-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1017147,
regarding quvi: FTBFS: ../../src/pbar/lpbar.h:24:56: error: ‘write’ redeclared
as different kind of symbol
to be marked as done.
Thi
This bug was reported against Stable. It cannot be considered as
closed for as long as a new 5.10 kernel including the fix hasn't been
published.
Martin-Éric
On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 5:15 PM Debian Bug Tracking System
wrote:
>
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which w
Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2022 14:40:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1013062: fixed in visualboyadvance 1.8.0.dfsg-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013062,
regarding visualboyadvance: ftbfs with GCC-12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
I have proposed a salsa MR to skip the offending tests at
https://salsa.debian.org/php-team/pear/php-dragonmantank-cron-expression/-/merge_requests/1.
I also forwarded the patch upstream with an explanation on why the tests
should be skipped at the moment [1].
[1] https://github.com/dragonmantan
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1018191 grave
Bug #1018191 [src:libapreq2] libapreq2: CVE-2022-22728: multipart form parse
memory corruption
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
10181
Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2022 14:10:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1017425: fixed in linux 5.19.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1017425,
regarding linux-image-5.18.0-4-686-pae Kernel panic on Pentium 3 and Athlon XP
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2022 14:10:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1017425: fixed in linux 5.19.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1017425,
regarding [i386] Unconditional LFENCE instructions in FILL_RETURN_BUFFER
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2022 12:42:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1018090: fixed in nautilus-hide 0.2.3-8.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1018090,
regarding nautilus-hide: Patch for compatibility with older python3-nautilus
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2022 12:19:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1017576: fixed in nautilus-admin 1.1.9-3.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1017576,
regarding nautilus-admin: Incompatible with Nautilus 43
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Source: ruby-vcr
Version: 6.0.0+really5.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: ftbfs
Dear maintainers,
The last upload failed to build from source.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ruby-vcr&arch=all&ver=6.0.0%2Breally5.0.0-3&stamp=1661725468&raw=0
when VCR.real_h
Hi Ilias,
On 01-09-2022 13:26, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
I read somewhere that disabling parallelism fixes
this, but I have not tried it yet. Would this be acceptable?
I'd say yes. Long build times are not release critical issues, while
this one is.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenP
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 06:29AM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Ping. Can this please be looked at? This is affecting more and more packages
> that can't migrate to testing (and I [Release Team hat on] don't want ghc in
> testing with this bug).
I will try to take a look, but I am not confident it will be s
Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2022 09:27:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1018863: fixed in wordpress 6.0.2+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1018863,
regarding wordpress: 6.0.2 Security and Maintenance Release
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1018863 [src:wordpress] wordpress: 6.0.2 Security and Maintenance Release
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1018863: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1018863
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1018863 in wordpress reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/wordpress/-/commit/c7b6b21a3fce6eee49536ffecd5e6
On Thu, 1 Sept 2022 at 16:39, Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
> Do the issues affect as well older series?
>
I suspect so because 2 days ago there was an update for the 5.7 branch
upstream.
https://github.com/WordPress/WordPress/commit/8b87e45e69889ec4a6a837c9d6971697da49e2c8
The commit message look
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 1017053
Bug #1017053 {Done: Drew Parsons } [src:fenics-dolfinx]
fenics-dolfinx: FTBFS on mips64el
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1017053 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Source: luajit2
Version: 2.1-20220411-5
Severity: serious
Justification: broken
Hi Mo, all,
As a follow-up of our transition bug # 1012362, I just discussed with
ftp-master on IRC to finally clean up the luajit* situation and I
learned (I should have realized) that the first thing that needs to
h
51 matches
Mail list logo
