Bug#1012224: It's a curl issue actually

2022-06-10 Thread julien . puydt
Hi, it is in fact a curl issue : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-tornado/+bug/1975527 This report is a duplicate of #1011696. I thought I had already reported to the curl maintainers, but the corresponding curl bug is #1012263, very recent and hasn't the right priority. Cheers

Bug#1011697: wxpython4.0: FTBFS with SIP 6.6

2022-06-10 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Upstream has changes to fix building with SIP 6.6: https://github.com/wxWidgets/Phoenix/pull/2179 But this is blocked because there is no SIP 6.6.2 release yet with many fixes for the new ply based parser.

Processed: severity of 1012485 is serious

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1012485 serious Bug #1012485 [src:barbican] barbican: autopkgtests fail under OpenSSL 3 Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1012485: https://bugs.debian

Bug#1006511: marked as done (net-snmp: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0)

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jun 2022 06:04:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1006511: fixed in net-snmp 5.9.1+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1006511, regarding net-snmp: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Processed: Bug#1006511 marked as pending in net-snmp

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1006511 [src:net-snmp] net-snmp: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1006511: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006511 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1006511: marked as pending in net-snmp

2022-06-10 Thread Craig Small
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1006511 in net-snmp reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/net-snmp/-/commit/b21431e00c07dbddca90e8c71eb86b1

Bug#1009383: retitle 1011392

2022-06-10 Thread Nicholas Breen
package ftp.debian.org retitle 1011392 RM: gromacs [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM, ANAIS; upstream support dropped for 32-bit archs; blocking transition to testing thanks

Bug#1011096: marked as done (chromium: i386 and armhf packages FTBFS in bullseye)

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jun 2022 02:50:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011096: fixed in chromium 102.0.5005.115-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1011096, regarding chromium: i386 and armhf packages FTBFS in bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#1005472: marked as done (typeshed: FTBFS: no such option: --system)

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jun 2022 02:37:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1005472: fixed in typeshed 0.0~git20220610.ad48606-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1005472, regarding typeshed: FTBFS: no such option: --system to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#1005472: marked as pending in typeshed

2022-06-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1005472 in typeshed reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/typeshed/-/commit/a675b1c0cd5cfdef6

Processed: Bug#1005472 marked as pending in typeshed

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1005472 [src:typeshed] typeshed: FTBFS: no such option: --system Added tag(s) pending. -- 1005472: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005472 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: unarchiving 1006245, found 1006245 in 4.1.6-1

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 1006245 Bug #1006245 {Done: Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) } [src:libwebsockets] libwebsockets: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0 Unarchived Bug 1006245 > found 1006245 4.1.6-1 Bug #1006245 {Done: Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) } [src:libwebsockets] libwebso

Bug#1012637: marked as done (libsystemd-shared: libsystemd-share dependency problem prevents configuration of systemd)

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2022 22:19:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1012637: fixed in systemd 251.2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1012637, regarding libsystemd-shared: libsystemd-share dependency problem prevents configuration of systemd to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1012637: libsystemd-shared: libsystemd-share dependency problem prevents configuration of systemd

2022-06-10 Thread Felicia P
It occurs when the command 'lb bootstrap' from the 'live-build' package is run, which in turn runs '/usr/lib/live/build/bootstrap' On 6/10/22 14:06, Michael Biebl wrote: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Am 10.06.22 um 22:53 schrieb Felicia P: Package: libsystemd-shared Version: 251.2-4 Severity:

Bug#1012626: sicherboot requires dependency on systemd-boot{,-efi}

2022-06-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 10.06.22 um 23:31 schrieb Michael Biebl: On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 18:38:15 +0200 Julian Andres Klode wrote: AFAIU, systemd-boot also ships its own integration which conflicts with sicherboot, as both would try to install kernels Not (yet). Atm, systemd-boot(-efi) simply contains the split out

Bug#1012626: sicherboot requires dependency on systemd-boot{,-efi}

2022-06-10 Thread Michael Biebl
On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 18:38:15 +0200 Julian Andres Klode wrote: AFAIU, systemd-boot also ships its own integration which conflicts with sicherboot, as both would try to install kernels Not (yet). Atm, systemd-boot(-efi) simply contains the split out files from systemd without any additional int

Processed: Re: Bug#1012637: libsystemd-shared: libsystemd-share dependency problem prevents configuration of systemd

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 = confirmed Bug #1012637 [libsystemd-shared] libsystemd-shared: libsystemd-share dependency problem prevents configuration of systemd Added tag(s) confirmed; removed tag(s) moreinfo. > severity -1 serious Bug #1012637 [libsystemd-shared] libsystemd-shared: l

Bug#1012638: balboa: FTBFS on ppc64el

2022-06-10 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: balboa Version: 2.0.0+ds-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs sid bookworm Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=balboa&arch=ppc64el&ver=2.0.0%2Bds-4%2Bb2&stamp=1654894135

Bug#1012449: python-magic: autopkgtest failure [PATCH]

2022-06-10 Thread Christoph Biedl
Adam Hupp wrote... > Would be preferable to use tox to run the tests so it's the same > configuration as I'm using to test. Didn't see your message before the upload, but I'll keep that in mind. Regards, Christoph signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1012633: imgvtopgm: FTBFS with netpbm11

2022-06-10 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: imgvtopgm Version: 2.0-9.1 Severity: serious User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu kinetic Hi Erik, imgvtopgm build-depends on libnetpbm9-dev, which has been obsoleted in favor of libnetpbm11-dev (related: https://bugs.debian.org/1007984). After updating the build-d

Bug#1012626: sicherboot requires dependency on systemd-boot{,-efi}

2022-06-10 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 07:38:10PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 18:38:15 +0200 Julian Andres Klode > wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 10:24:53AM -0500, Dustin L. Howett wrote: > > > Package: sicherboot > > > Version: 0.1.5 > > > Severity: normal > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: dus...@ho

Bug#1005661: marked as done (apertium-mk-bg: FTBFS: wrong parameters to apertium-gen-modes)

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2022 19:00:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1005661: fixed in apertium-mkd-bul 0.2.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1005661, regarding apertium-mk-bg: FTBFS: wrong parameters to apertium-gen-modes to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#1005663: marked as done (apertium-es-ast: FTBFS: wrong parameters to apertium-gen-modes)

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2022 19:00:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1005663: fixed in apertium-spa-ast 1.1.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1005663, regarding apertium-es-ast: FTBFS: wrong parameters to apertium-gen-modes to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#1002244: marked as done (apertium-en-es: FTBFS: apertium-gen-modes fails)

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2022 19:00:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1002244: fixed in apertium-eng-spa 0.8.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1002244, regarding apertium-en-es: FTBFS: apertium-gen-modes fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#1005659: marked as done (apertium-is-sv: FTBFS: wrong parameters to apertium-gen-modes)

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2022 19:00:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1005659: fixed in apertium-isl-swe 0.1.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1005659, regarding apertium-is-sv: FTBFS: wrong parameters to apertium-gen-modes to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#1012626: sicherboot requires dependency on systemd-boot{,-efi}

2022-06-10 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 18:38:15 +0200 Julian Andres Klode wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 10:24:53AM -0500, Dustin L. Howett wrote: > > Package: sicherboot > > Version: 0.1.5 > > Severity: normal > > X-Debbugs-Cc: dus...@howett.net > > > > As of systemd-251.2-3, systemd-boot and systemd-boot-efi ha

Processed (with 1 error): affects 1012629, reassign 1012629 to rocksdb/7.2.2-3

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1012629 - rocksdb Bug #1012629 [src:balboa] balboa: hangs with new rocksdb Removed indication that 1012629 affects rocksdb > reassign 1012629 rocksdb/7.2.2-3 balboa/2.0.0+ds-4 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > thanks Sto

Processed: affects 1012629

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1012629 - rocksdb/7.2.2-3 Bug #1012629 [src:balboa] balboa: hangs with new rocksdb Removed indication that 1012629 affects rocksdb/7.2.2-3 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1012629: https://b

Processed: affects 1012629

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1012629 rocksdb Bug #1012629 [src:balboa] balboa: hangs with new rocksdb Added indication that 1012629 affects rocksdb > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1012629: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b

Processed: affects 1012629

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 1012629 rocksdb/7.2.2-3 Bug #1012629 [src:balboa] balboa: hangs with new rocksdb Added indication that 1012629 affects rocksdb/7.2.2-3 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1012629: https://bugs.

Bug#1012629: balboa: hangs with new rocksdb

2022-06-10 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: balboa Version: 2.0.0+ds-4 Severity: serious Hi Sascha, Where previously the autopkgtests for balboa would complete in seconds (<1 min), after the most recent no-change rebuild against new rocksdb they hang indefinitely and eventually fail with a timeout. Looking at the systemd journal o

Processed: src:python-gitlab: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC bug

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 1:3.3.0-1 Bug #1012628 [src:python-gitlab] src:python-gitlab: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC bug Marked as fixed in versions python-gitlab/1:3.3.0-1. Bug #1012628 [src:python-gitlab] src:python-gitlab: fails to migrate to testing f

Bug#1012628: src:python-gitlab: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC bug

2022-06-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: python-gitlab Version: 1:2.10.1-2 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1:3.3.0-1 Tags: sid bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Control: block -1 by 1010119 Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing

Bug#999115: marked as done (esekeyd: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2022 17:05:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#999115: fixed in esekeyd 1.2.7-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #999115, regarding esekeyd: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#1012626: sicherboot requires dependency on systemd-boot{,-efi}

2022-06-10 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 10:24:53AM -0500, Dustin L. Howett wrote: > Package: sicherboot > Version: 0.1.5 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: dus...@howett.net > > As of systemd-251.2-3, systemd-boot and systemd-boot-efi have been split > out of the systemd package. This causes sicherboot to fail to

Bug#1012595: marked as done (faiss build-depends on obsolete package.)

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:48:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1012595: fixed in faiss 1.7.2-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1012595, regarding faiss build-depends on obsolete package. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Processed: severity of 1012626 is serious

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1012626 serious Bug #1012626 [sicherboot] sicherboot requires dependency on systemd-boot{,-efi} Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1012626: https://bug

Bug#1012014: marked as done (r8125: fails to build module for Linux 5.17)

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2022 14:35:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1012014: fixed in r8125 9.009.01-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1012014, regarding r8125: fails to build module for Linux 5.17 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Processed: tagging 1001057

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1001057 + security Bug #1001057 {Done: Julian Andres Klode } [grub2] grub2: CVE-2022-28735 grub2: shim_lock verifier allows non-kernel files to be loaded Added tag(s) security. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you nee

Processed: reopening 1000929

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 1000929 Bug #1000929 {Done: Ilias Tsitsimpis } [src:ghc] Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-13 or 14 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them

Processed: closing 1011811

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1011811 Bug #1011811 [golang-github-containers-buildah] libpod: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:29: override_dh_auto_build] Error 25 Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1011

Bug#1000929: marked as done (Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-13 or 14)

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2022 10:34:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1000929: fixed in ghc 9.0.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1000929, regarding Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-13 or 14 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#1012609: marked as done (schroot: FTBFS on arch:all, cannot find ".../debian/build/po/cs.gmo": No such file or directory)

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2022 10:20:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1012609: fixed in schroot 1.6.10-15 has caused the Debian Bug report #1012609, regarding schroot: FTBFS on arch:all, cannot find ".../debian/build/po/cs.gmo": No such file or directory to be marked as done. T

Bug#1012609: marked as pending in schroot

2022-06-10 Thread Jakob Haufe
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1012609 in schroot reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/schroot/-/commit/f49c88a1bf393ed73f9676cbcd9717415

Processed: Bug#1012609 marked as pending in schroot

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1012609 [src:schroot] schroot: FTBFS on arch:all, cannot find ".../debian/build/po/cs.gmo": No such file or directory Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1012609 to the same tags previously set -- 1012609: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug

Bug#1012609: marked as pending in schroot

2022-06-10 Thread Jakob Haufe
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1012609 in schroot reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/schroot/-/commit/f49c88a1bf393ed73f9676cbcd9717415

Processed: Bug#1012609 marked as pending in schroot

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1012609 [src:schroot] schroot: FTBFS on arch:all, cannot find ".../debian/build/po/cs.gmo": No such file or directory Added tag(s) pending. -- 1012609: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1012609 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1001057: marked as done (grub2: CVE-2022-28735 grub2: shim_lock verifier allows non-kernel files to be loaded)

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2022 09:49:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1001057: fixed in grub2 2.06-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1001057, regarding grub2: CVE-2022-28735 grub2: shim_lock verifier allows non-kernel files to be loaded to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#1005667: marked as done (apertium-pt-gl: FTBFS: wrong parameters to apertium-gen-modes)

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jun 2022 09:18:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1005667: fixed in apertium-pt-gl 0.9.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1005667, regarding apertium-pt-gl: FTBFS: wrong parameters to apertium-gen-modes to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1012609: schroot: FTBFS on arch:all, cannot find ".../debian/build/po/cs.gmo": No such file or directory

2022-06-10 Thread Julien Cristau
Source: schroot Version: 1.6.10-14 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=schroot&arch=all&ver=1.6.10-14&stamp=1654764990&raw=0 > make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/debian/build/po'

Bug#1010887: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1010887: eslint FTBFS and autopkgtest failure

2022-06-10 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Control: tags -1 +unreproducible Control: severity -1 minor Quoting Yadd (2022-06-10 10:08:54) > Hi, > > I'm unable to reproduce this issue, can someone confirm ? Yeah, I also cannot reproduce that specific failure now, so evidently the error was somewhere else. A month ago I tried to work arou

Processed: Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1010887: eslint FTBFS and autopkgtest failure

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 +unreproducible Bug #1010887 [eslint] eslint FTBFS and autopkgtest failure Added tag(s) unreproducible. > severity -1 minor Bug #1010887 [eslint] eslint FTBFS and autopkgtest failure Severity set to 'minor' from 'serious' -- 1010887: https://bugs.debian.org

Processed: tagging 1010887

2022-06-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1010887 + moreinfo Bug #1010887 [eslint] eslint FTBFS and autopkgtest failure Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1010887: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=

Bug#1010887: eslint FTBFS and autopkgtest failure

2022-06-10 Thread Yadd
Hi, I'm unable to reproduce this issue, can someone confirm ?

Bug#1012600: Further info

2022-06-10 Thread Holger Schröder
Hi. This build here from Ubuntu Launchpad contains all patches (19) for a successful build. https://ppa.launchpadcontent.net/vicamo/ppa-1971456/ubuntu/pool/main/z/zfs-linux/zfs-linux_2.1.4-0ubuntu0.2.debian.tar.xz ...