Bug#995224: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#995224: relion-cuda: FTBFS with cub 1.14

2022-03-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 20/02/2022 10.21, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: Currently thrust and cub are out of sync. I got somewhat distracted ... OK, got it. Just wanted to find out if there's anything I can do from the relion packaging side. Will take a break from working on this then until this is sorted out. thrust a

Bug#993451: marked as done (osslsigncode: timestamp-based tests fail on amd64 (sometimes))

2022-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2022 07:04:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#993451: fixed in osslsigncode 2.3.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #993451, regarding osslsigncode: timestamp-based tests fail on amd64 (sometimes) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#993452: marked as done (osslsigncode: MSI tests fail on big-endian architectures)

2022-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Mar 2022 07:04:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#993452: fixed in osslsigncode 2.3.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #993452, regarding osslsigncode: MSI tests fail on big-endian architectures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#1006816: Forwarded upstream

2022-03-09 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, I forwarded the bug to upstream: https://github.com/agronholm/anyio/issues/417 Here is the commit upstream would like feedback about: https://github.com/agronholm/anyio/commit/184744ca291d426dd278f697c3637623eb9de0ed Can you check? Thanks! J.Puydt

Bug#1006989: nim: incompatible with OpenSSL 3.0

2022-03-09 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: nim Version: 1.6.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu jammy Hi Federico, The nim source package currently has a hard-coded build-dependency (and runtime dependency) on libssl1.1. Attempting to switch to libssl3 results in an

Processed: Re: lsp-plugins 1.1.31-1 FTBFS on armhf

2022-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #1003904 [lsp-plugins] lsp-plugins 1.1.31-1 FTBFS on armhf Added tag(s) patch. -- 1003904: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1003904 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1003904: lsp-plugins 1.1.31-1 FTBFS on armhf

2022-03-09 Thread Steve Langasek
Package: lsp-plugins Version: 1.1.31-1 Followup-For: Bug #1003904 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu jammy ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Hi there, Attached is a patch that we have applied in Ubuntu to fix this build failure. It's not suitable as-is for application

Bug#1006733: marked as done (phpunit breaks php-nesbot-carbon autopkgtest: rounding differences)

2022-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 09 Mar 2022 22:03:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1006733: fixed in php-nesbot-carbon 2.55.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1006733, regarding phpunit breaks php-nesbot-carbon autopkgtest: rounding differences to be marked as done. This means that you cl

Bug#1004035: marked as done (rumur FTBFS on 32bit: Bad system call)

2022-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 09 Mar 2022 21:06:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1004035: fixed in rumur 2022.03.05-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1004035, regarding rumur FTBFS on 32bit: Bad system call to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Processed: tagging 1006733

2022-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1006733 + pending Bug #1006733 [php-nesbot-carbon] phpunit breaks php-nesbot-carbon autopkgtest: rounding differences Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1006733: https://bu

Bug#1006985: ruby-em-http-request: autopkgtest regression: timeout

2022-03-09 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: ruby-em-http-request Version: 1.1.5-3 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression timesout Dear maintainer(s), Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, recently it started failing in testing (looking at the date, probably when ruby-defaults migrated)

Bug#1006982: ruby-clockwork: flaky autopkgtest

2022-03-09 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: ruby-clockwork Version: 2.0.4-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: flaky Dear maintainer(s), I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of you package because it was showing up as a regression for the upload of ruby-defaults. I noticed that the test regularly

Bug#1006981: rails: flaky autopkgtest on some ci.d.n architectures

2022-03-09 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: rails Version: 2:6.0.3.5+dfsg-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: flaky Dear maintainer(s), I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of you package on amd64 and armhf because it was showing up as a regression for the upload of ruby-defaults. I noticed that

Bug#1006535: marked as done (sphinx-remove-toctrees - source-only upload required.)

2022-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 09 Mar 2022 11:30:54 -0800 with message-id <3728c09aa2dae39f8c2bc9d915c85401e7f3979d.ca...@ghic.org> and subject line sphinx-remove-toctrees - source-only upload required. has caused the Debian Bug report #1006535, regarding sphinx-remove-toctrees - source-only upload requir

Bug#1006380: Blocked by r-cran-jinjar (waiting in new queue)

2022-03-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: block -1 by 1005377 The new upstream version of r-cran-emayili needs r-cran-jinjar which is waiting in new queue. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Processed: Blocked by r-cran-jinjar (waiting in new queue)

2022-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block -1 by 1005377 Bug #1006380 [src:r-cran-tidyr, src:r-cran-emayili] r-cran-tidyr breaks r-cran-emayili autopkgtest: Input must be a vector, not a object. 1006380 was not blocked by any bugs. 1006380 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1006380: 1

Bug#993716: bridge-utils: IPv6 network bridge fails after upgrading Buster to Bullseye

2022-03-09 Thread Michael Prokop
Hi, * Santiago Garcia Mantinan [Mon Sep 06, 2021 at 11:04:58AM +0200]: > I'm CCing Josué because this seems to be more on ifupdown's side than on > bridge-utils. [...] > I know we are having quite some trouble with the random bridge mac address, > but this doesn't seem to be one of those cases.

Processed: severity of 998516 is important

2022-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 998516 important Bug #998516 [bridge-utils] bridge-utils: Kernel assigns same MAC-address to the bridge on 2 similar network devices Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Processed: tagging 998516

2022-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 998516 + moreinfo Bug #998516 [bridge-utils] bridge-utils: Kernel assigns same MAC-address to the bridge on 2 similar network devices Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 99

Bug#998516: bridge-utils: Kernel assigns same MAC-address to the bridge on 2 similar network devices

2022-03-09 Thread Michael Prokop
Hi, * Alf [Thu Nov 04, 2021 at 08:24:35PM +0100]: > Having 2 tiny servers (APU2.C4 and APU.2D4) in my local net each having > 3 ethernet interfaces assigned to a bridge "br0" (configured in > /etc/network/interfaces). > Upgrading from Bustser to Bullseye worked fine for the first box, the bridge

Bug#993451: osslsigncode distribution does not have production-quality tests (yet)

2022-03-09 Thread Stephen Kitt
Hi Mike, Le 09/03/2022 13:41, Michał Trojnara a écrit : Didn't you notice that these tests are *not* part of the osslsigncode release tarball? Just because some random code can be found is in the same GitHub repository doesn't meany it's suitable for production use. Apologies, I did not noti

Bug#1005867: marked as done (node-sanitize-html: Broken by node-htmlparser2 >=7)

2022-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 09 Mar 2022 13:06:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1005867: fixed in node-sanitize-html 2.7.0+~2.6.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1005867, regarding node-sanitize-html: Broken by node-htmlparser2 >=7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1005867: marked as pending in node-sanitize-html

2022-03-09 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1005867 in node-sanitize-html reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-sanitize-html/-/commit/52a4e6233e

Bug#993451: osslsigncode distribution does not have production-quality tests (yet)

2022-03-09 Thread Michał Trojnara
Hi Stephen, Didn't you notice that these tests are *not* part of the osslsigncode release tarball?  Just because some random code can be found is in the same GitHub repository doesn't meany it's suitable for production use. There is a very good reason why "make check" doesn't work in osslsigncode

Processed: Bug#1005867 marked as pending in node-sanitize-html

2022-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1005867 [node-sanitize-html] node-sanitize-html: Broken by node-htmlparser2 >=7 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1005867: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005867 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: nvidia-cuda-toolkit: nvcc chokes on g++ 11.2's bits/std_function.h

2022-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 1003037 with -1 Bug #1003037 [src:astra-toolbox] astra-toolbox: FTBFS: error: parameter packs not expanded with '...' 1003037 was not blocked by any bugs. 1003037 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1003037: 1006962 -- 1003037: https://bugs.d

Bug#1006962: nvidia-cuda-toolkit: nvcc chokes on g++ 11.2's bits/std_function.h

2022-03-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: nvidia-cuda-toolkit Version: 11.4.3-2 Severity: serious Control: block 1003037 with -1 nvcc fails to compile bits/std_function.h from g++ 11.2: $ echo '#include ' | nvcc -ccbin g++-11 -x cu -c - /usr/include/c++/11/bits/std_function.h:435:145: error: parameter packs not expanded with ‘.

Bug#1006465: marked as done (python-dbusmock: Fails to build from source: README.rst is not README.md)

2022-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 09 Mar 2022 12:19:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1006465: fixed in python-dbusmock 0.26.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1006465, regarding python-dbusmock: Fails to build from source: README.rst is not README.md to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#1006465: marked as pending in python-dbusmock

2022-03-09 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #1006465 in python-dbusmock reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-dbusmock/-/commit/c19

Processed: Bug#1006465 marked as pending in python-dbusmock

2022-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1006465 [src:python-dbusmock] python-dbusmock: Fails to build from source: README.rst is not README.md Added tag(s) pending. -- 1006465: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006465 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.deb

Bug#999761: marked as done (fastjet: ships a copy of siscone)

2022-03-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 09 Mar 2022 11:05:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#999761: fixed in fastjet 3.4.0+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #999761, regarding fastjet: ships a copy of siscone to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#1006948: gcc-12: FTBFS on mips64el

2022-03-09 Thread YunQiang Su
On Tue, 08 Mar 2022 20:53:46 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: > Source: gcc-12 > Version: 12-20220222-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > Dear Matthias, GCC maintainers, > > gcc-12 fails to build from source on mips64el in unstable. Normally this > isn't an issue, but it builds a Build-Depends of g