On Sun, 2021-09-19 at 00:20 -0400, The Hermit wrote:
> Failed at:
> root@nevermore:/usr/src# sudo debi --upgrade
> debi: cannot find readable debian/changelog anywhere!
> Are you in the source code tree?
Woops, debi needs to be run from the unpacked source package.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.de
First, thank you. ;)
Failed at:
root@nevermore:/usr/src# sudo debi --upgrade
debi: cannot find readable debian/changelog anywhere!
Are you in the source code tree?
I tried doing this from /usr/local/src and then /usr/src.
Not that familiar with Debian builds so not sure where I went wrong. I
r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 992668 with 994584
Bug #992668 [ricochet-im] ricochet-im: does not start
992668 was not blocked by any bugs.
992668 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 992668: 994584
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2021 22:33:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#994572: fixed in cfrpki 1.3.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #994572,
regarding cfrpki: CVE-2021-3761
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:7.2.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: the package is unusable
$ libreoffice
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin: symbol lookup error:
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so: undefined symbol:
_ZNK11LanguageTag20getGlibcLocaleStringESt17basic_string_vie
# ci.debian.org tests appear to pass now
close 992672 2021.08.1+dfsg-2
thanks
Looks like everything passes now
autopkgtest for dask/2021.08.1+dfsg-2: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Pass,
i386: Pass, ppc64el: Pass
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 994612 src:nodejs
Bug #994612 [nodjes] nodjes: Please fix nodejs debci regression
Warning: Unknown package 'nodjes'
Bug reassigned from package 'nodjes' to 'src:nodejs'.
No longer marked as found in versions 12.22.5~dfsg-3.
Ignoring reque
Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2021 19:05:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#978916: fixed in varnish 6.6.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #978916,
regarding varnish: ftbfs with autoconf 2.70
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # ci.debian.org tests appear to pass now
> close 992672 2021.08.1+dfsg-2
Bug #992672 [src:dask] scipy breaks dask autopkgtest: 5 times FAILED
array/tests/test_stats.py::test_two
Marked as fixed in versions dask/2021.08.1+dfsg-2.
Bug #992672 [src:
Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2021 18:11:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#978895: fixed in rasqal 0.9.33-0.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #978895,
regarding rasqal: ftbfs with autoconf 2.70
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Quoting Jérémy Lal (2021-09-18 18:25:10)
> node-stringprep is totally abandoned. It would be so great to drop
> that package.
Agreed - no need to keep that alive.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me
Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2021 17:20:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#947667: fixed in gabedit 2.5.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #947667,
regarding gabedit: build-depends (unnecessarily?) on deprecated
libpangox-1.0-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2021 16:25:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#994595: fixed in libuser 1:0.63~dfsg-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #994595,
regarding libuser1-dev: Missing dependencies against libglib2.0-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
node-stringprep is totally abandoned. It would be so great to drop that
package.
Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2021 15:37:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#994290: fixed in gromacs 2021.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #994290,
regarding gromacs build-depends on gcc-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2021 15:22:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#994426: fixed in octave-sparsersb 1.0.8-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #994426,
regarding octave-sparsersb: flaky autopkgtest on ci.d.n armhf worker
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: nodjes
Version: 12.22.5~dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
Debci fail with against 12.22.5~dfsg-2 with:
duration_ms: 0.293
severity: fail
exitcode: 1
stack: |-
assert.js:101
throw new AssertionError(obj);
^
AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Expected valu
debian/upstream
To fix the situation please do the following:
1) Examine debian/copyright_* and referenced files
2) Update debian/copyright as needed
3) Replace debian/copyright_hints with debian/copyright_newhints
touch debian/stamp-copyright-check
touch debian/stamp-upstream-cruft
node-gy
Source: node-stringprep
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
Trying to convert this package to arch:foreign due to an upstream error when we
removed icu-config this package does not compile source, thus ship an empty
lib..
I tried to get the sou
Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2021 11:33:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#993722: fixed in gap 4.11.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #993722,
regarding FTBFS: tempfile: not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2021 10:49:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#994372: fixed in qscintilla2 2.11.6+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #994372,
regarding qscintilla2: Removal of the python3-*-dbg packages in sid/bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 994337 by 980417 994327 994333 994353
Bug #994337 [src:pyqt5] pyqt5: Removal of the python3-*-dbg packages in
sid/bookworm
994337 was not blocked by any bugs.
994337 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 994337: 994327, 994333
Package: libuser1-dev
Version: 1:0.62~dfsg-0.4
Severity: serious
Tags: bullseye bookworm sid
Hello,
Looking at the libuser.pc file, it seems that the libuser1-dev is
missing a dependency against libglib2.0-dev
Could you please add it?
Kind regards,
Laurent Bigonville
-- System Information:
De
Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2021 09:05:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#994484: fixed in hkl 5.0.0.2816-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #994484,
regarding hkl: binary-any FTBFS due to missing build dependency on gtk-doc-tools
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2021 08:24:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#994586: fixed in procdump 1.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #994586,
regarding procdump: Frequent parallel FTBFS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Hi,
updating to a newer version will probably make that issue go away ; I'm
expecting an answer to https://github.com/jupyterlab/lumino/issues/235
before going forward.
Cheers,
J.Puydt
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 02:15:50PM +0200, Sylvain Tgz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
> I didn't know graphic rendering specificities of firefox. Thank you
> for the information.
>
> I opened the bug on libegl-mesa0 because it was the first packet of
> dependencies list.
> I us
Source: procdump
Version: 1.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/i386/procdump.html
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=procdump&ver=1.2-1
...
/usr/bin/ld: cannot open output file bin/ProcDumpTestApplication: No such file
or dir
28 matches
Mail list logo
