Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # fix version tracking info
> reassign 980379 golang-github-cznic-fileutil
Bug #980379 {Done: Aloïs Micard } [src:golang-github-cznic-b]
FTBFS: expects import "modernc.org/mathutil"
Bug reassigned from package 'src:golang-github-cznic-b' to
'gol
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # fix version tracking info
> reassign 980572 golang-github-cznic-fileutil
Bug #980572 {Done: Aloïs Micard } [src:golang-github-cznic-ql]
golang-github-cznic-ql 1.0.6-1 fails to build from source (ftbfs)
Bug #980706 {Done: Aloïs Micard } [src:gol
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # fix version tracking info
> reassign 980668 golang-github-cznic-fileutil
Bug #980668 {Done: Aloïs Micard }
[src:golang-github-cznic-lldb] golang-github-cznic-lldb: FTBFS: expects import
"modernc.org/fileutil"
Bug #980573 {Done: Aloïs Micard }
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 02:36:11PM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Wednesday, 10 February 2021 9:27:04 AM AEDT Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Is the new FTBFS problem [1] or something else?
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/antlr/antlr4/pull/3071
>
> Thanks for a link. To me it looks like a new problem:
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 980380 golang-github-cznic-mathutil
Bug #980380 {Done: Aloïs Micard }
[src:golang-github-cznic-fileutil] FTBFS: expects import "modernc.org/mathutil"
Bug reassigned from package 'src:golang-github-cznic-fileutil' to
'golang-github-cznic
The issue is you won't be able to install manpages-de afterwards (the fix
is one-way). See #982355 for the other half to this.
- Craig
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 03:39, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> [ CC Helge & Craig ]
>
> With the attached debdiff on top of Helge's 4.9.1-1 tarball I was able
> to co-ins
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 8:25 AM Craig Small wrote:
>
> The issue is you won't be able to install manpages-de afterwards (the fix is
> one-way). See #982355 for the other half to this.
>
Yeah.
AFAICS for procps and manpages-de this file caused the conflict:
de/man1/w.1.po
First, I wanted to
Control: tag -1 + unreproducible
Hi Adrian (2021.02.07_05:09:48_-0800)
I can't reproduce this on the porterbox abel. Any ideas?
SR
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + unreproducible
Bug #982209 [src:python-limits] python-limits: autopkgtest failure on armhf
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
--
982209: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=982209
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with proble
On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 01:43 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 04:20:47PM +0100, Michael R. Crusoe wrote:
> > Control: forwarded -1
> > https://github.com/theislab/anndata/issues/443
> >
> > I've let upstream know about this, thanks.
>
> Unless they have a solution immediately, I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # no longer rc in stable/testing/unstable
> tags 873160 + stretch
Bug #873160 [python-pymad] python-pymad: pymad in stretch decodes to noise
Added tag(s) stretch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
87
Your message dated Wed, 10 Feb 2021 05:03:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#962844: fixed in mdadm 4.1-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #962844,
regarding mdadm: Assembling RAID using IMSM in initrd fails due to lack of
module efivarfs
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #962844 in mdadm reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/lechner/mdadm/-/commit/cea46a2f7341b5b87d55f66d623a352fbc0bf
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #962844 [mdadm] mdadm: Assembling RAID using IMSM in initrd fails due to
lack of module efivarfs
Added tag(s) pending.
--
962844: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962844
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
On Wednesday, 10 February 2021 9:27:04 AM AEDT Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Is the new FTBFS problem [1] or something else?
>
> [1] https://github.com/antlr/antlr4/pull/3071
Thanks for a link. To me it looks like a new problem:
library/parsers/libparsers.so.8.0.23: undefined reference to
`antlr4:
Your message dated Wed, 10 Feb 2021 02:21:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981770: fixed in erfs 1.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #981770,
regarding erfs: Missing dependency on openssl
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing control commands:
> tags 974996 + pending
Bug #974996 [curl] Please build-depend on libidn2-dev instead of obsolete
transition package libidn2-0-dev
Added tag(s) pending.
--
974996: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974996
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs
Control: tags 974996 + pending
Hello everyone,
I've merged Bruno's MR and uploaded 7.74.0-1.1 as an NMU to DELAYED/3.
Please feel free to upload it before that or delay/cancel the NMU if
you consider it appropriate.
diff -Nru curl-7.74.0/debian/changelog curl-7.74.0/debian/changelog
--- curl-7.7
Hello all, cc'ing the maintainer directly,
It seems like this package only had uploads from the new maintainer
for a period of 5 months back in 2018, so I'm planning to add myself
as an uploader (without removing the current maintainer) and package
the new release (besides putting the package in s
Package: python3-louvain
Version: 0.0+20181013git3fc1f575-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Python packaging 3.3 Module Package Names
Dear Maintainer,
According to Section 3.3 of the Python Policy package binary names should match
their import names:
https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/
Your message dated Wed, 10 Feb 2021 01:03:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981810: fixed in python-fabio 0.11.0+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #981810,
regarding python-fabio: regression in autopkgtest tests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Processing control commands:
> tags 982149 + patch
Bug #982149 [src:golang-github-xenolf-lego] golang-github-xenolf-lego:
autopkgtest regression: Build failure
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 982149 + pending
Bug #982149 [src:golang-github-xenolf-lego] golang-github-xenolf-lego:
autopkgtest regressio
Control: tags 982149 + patch
Control: tags 982149 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for golang-github-xenolf-lego (versioned as
3.2.0-3.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell
me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru golang-github-xenolf-lego-3.2.0/debian/ch
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 975789 with 982149
Bug #975789 {Done: Arnaud Rebillout }
[src:golang-github-xenolf-lego] golang-github-xenolf-lego: FTBFS:
src/github.com/go-acme/lego/providers/dns/inwx/inwx.go:85:6: assignment
mismatch: 1 variable but d.client.Account.L
Processing control commands:
> tags 981094 + patch
Bug #981094 [golang-github-nrdcg-goinwx-dev] golang-github-nrdcg-goinwx-dev
needs Breaks: golang-github-xenolf-lego-dev (<< 3.2.0-3~)
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 981094 + pending
Bug #981094 [golang-github-nrdcg-goinwx-dev] golang-github-nrdcg-goi
Control: tags 981094 + patch
Control: tags 981094 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for golang-github-nrdcg-goinwx (versioned as
0.8.1-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell
me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru golang-github-nrdcg-goinwx-0.8.1/debian/
Control: tags 977054 + patch
Control: tags 977054 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for aiorwlock (versioned as 1.0.0-0.1) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru aiorwlock-0.6.0/aiorwlock/__init__.py aiorwlock-1.0.0/aio
Processing control commands:
> tags 977054 + patch
Bug #977054 [src:aiorwlock] aiorwlock FTBFS with pytest 6
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 977054 + pending
Bug #977054 [src:aiorwlock] aiorwlock FTBFS with pytest 6
Added tag(s) pending.
--
977054: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=97
Hi
yubioath-desktop is now uploaded, but exhibits another bug that adds
additional digits at the beginning with (some? all?) older keys.
See https://github.com/Yubico/yubioath-desktop/issues/693
According to the issue, this needs to be fixed in ykman, so there is
the need to upload a new version
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 04:20:47PM +0100, Michael R. Crusoe wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/theislab/anndata/issues/443
>
> I've let upstream know about this, thanks.
Unless they have a solution immediately, I would recommend trying the
following:
> > Removing this assert in l
Source: r-cran-seurat
Version: 4.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/i386/r/r-cran-seurat/10310072/log.gz
...
══ Failed tests
── Error (test_load_10X.R:37:3): 10x Spatial Data Parsing ─
Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 23:33:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981804: fixed in yubioath-desktop 5.0.4+post1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #981804,
regarding yubioath-desktop: fails to read yubikey
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 22:33:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957384: fixed in jabber-muc 0.8-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #957384,
regarding jabber-muc: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021, at 19:30, nicoo wrote:
> Could you check the following two things for me?
>
> 1. Does redshift work in “manual” mode, i.e. providing it with latitude and
>longitude? That could be a workaround, as you can pass it `-l LAT:LON` on
>the command line, or set it in ~/.confi
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 07:10:14PM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Saturday, 23 January 2021 6:28:09 AM AEDT Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > Indeed, the latest 8.0.23 release is now fixed:
> > | * MySQL Workbench now uses Python 3 for functionality such
> > | as migration, scripting shell, adminis
Control: tags 946863 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for freewheeling (versioned as 0.6.4-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
diff -Nru freewheeling-0.6.4/debian/changelog freewheeling-0.6.4/deb
Processing control commands:
> tags 946863 + pending
Bug #946863 [src:freewheeling] freewheeling FTBFS after libfluidsynth update
Added tag(s) pending.
--
946863: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946863
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 21:50:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#947662: fixed in repsnapper 2.5a5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #947662,
regarding repsnapper: depends on deprecated libpangox-1.0-0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Package: sparse
Version: 0.6.3-1
Severity: serious
It seems the runtime dependency was not changed
when switching to gcc-10.
Source: pygccjit
Version: 0.4-10
Severity: serious
pygccjit build depends on gcc-9,
it seems to build fine with gcc 10.
Source: eso-midas
Version: 19.02pl1.1-5
Severity: serious
After the #978510 fix a stale build dependency on gcc-9 is left.
Hi Joe,
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 20:15:01 -0500
Joe Nahmias wrote:
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> Sorry, been afk for a few days...
Yep, I guessed so, no problem.
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 12:48:45PM +0100, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> > control: tags -1 confirmed
> >
> > Hi Joe,
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 07:
Package: libwww-freshmeat-perl
Version: 0.22-2.1
Severity: serious
Freshmeat became Freecode, which became read-only in 2014.
There seems to be an active spinoff at http://freshcode.club/
but libwww-freshmeat-perl seems to hardcode freshmeat.net
> Version: 20~git20201216.e48beee+dfsg-1
>
> tt-rss (20~git20201216.e48beee+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=high
>
> * new upstream snapshot (Closes: #970633)
>- Fixes: CVE-2020-25787, CVE-2020-25788, CVE-2020-25789
Uh :( Apparently this version never was uploaded actually? There is
not trace of
Hi.
Thanks for identifying and explaining this bug.
I tried to workaround by installing older packages but failed.
I found out that apt preferences need to be split into two separate files:
# /etc/apt/preferences.d/yubikey-manager
# Workaround for #981804, delete when fixed
Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 19:33:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#981764: fixed in black 20.8b1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #981764,
regarding autopkg tests should neither use easy_install nor pip
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Tue, 9 Feb 2021 21:20:31 +0200
with message-id <20210209192031.GA31839@localhost>
and subject line Fixed in 20~git20201216.e48beee+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #970633,
regarding tt-rss: CVE-2020-25787 CVE-2020-25788 CVE-2020-25789
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 19:20:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982116: fixed in vdjtools 1.2.1+git20190311-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #982116,
regarding vdjtools: autopkgtest fails due to slightly differing result on !x86
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing control commands:
> tags 974993 + patch
Bug #974993 [html-xml-utils] Please build-depend on libidn2-dev instead of
obsolete transition package libidn2-0-dev
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #974993 to the same tags previously set
> tags 974993 + pending
Bug #974993 [html-xml-utils
Control: tags 974993 + patch
Control: tags 974993 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for html-xml-utils (versioned as 7.7-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer or cancel the NMU.
Regards.
diff -Nru html-xml-utils-7.7/debian/chan
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 bullseye-ignore
Bug #977765 [src:gsfonts] src:gsfonts: package superseded by fonts-urw-base35
Added tag(s) bullseye-ignore.
--
977765: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977765
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with prob
Control: tag -1 bullseye-ignore
Hi,
On 09-02-2021 09:36, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> So, to summarize: Yes, I think we should replace gsfonts+gsfonts-x11
> with fonts-urw-base35 at a given time and this transition is already
> prepared for the most part.
To be fair, I think the commented out part
On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 08:37:45PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > Find attached the full debdiff and the filtered debdiff with only the
> > debian/* files.
> >
> > I tried to find a balance between doing all necessary changes and not
> > completely overhauling the packaging. It seems that the r
Hello Craig,
thank you very much for your support. I was tired and frustrated
yesterday.
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 04:34:19PM -0500, Craig Small wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
> The first problem I can see is you haven't pushed the git tags. Salsa
> doesn't know about t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 947649 + sid
Bug #947649 [src:pangox-compat] pangox-compat: deprecated since 2012,
unmaintained, should probably be removed
Added tag(s) sid.
> tags 702011 + sid
Bug #702011 [src:gtkmathview] gtkmathview: uses pangox which is going away
Adde
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 09:12:25AM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>Hi Paul,
>I am pretty sure the culprit is this upstream
>issue: https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/2305
>So, the bug should resolve itself when BIND 9.16.10 is uploaded to the
>archive. If not, I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 980689 !
Bug #980689 [cl-postgres] cl-postgres: fails to load with SBCL 2.1.0
Bug #980801 [cl-postgres] pgcharts: FTBFS with sbcl 2.1
Owner recorded as Sébastien Villemot .
Owner recorded as Sébastien Villemot .
> thanks
Stopping processing
Source: sunpy
Version: 2.1.0~rc1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi,
sunpy/experimental recently started to FTBFS. This must have been caused
by an updated (transitive) build-dependency, since the package built fine in
Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 17:05:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#982111: fixed in r-cran-rcdk 3.5.0+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #982111,
regarding r-cran-rcdk: autopkgtest failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 16:48:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#979231: fixed in a2ps 1:4.14-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #979231,
regarding the new mailcap entry breaks mutt
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
[ CC Helge & Craig ]
With the attached debdiff on top of Helge's 4.9.1-1 tarball I was able
to co-install latest procps, psmisc and (pending) manpages-de.
Check with dpkg:
root# dpkg -l | egrep 'manpages-de|procps|psmisc' | awk '/^ii/ {print
$1 " " $2 " " $3}' | column -t
ii libprocps8:amd64 2
Package: procps
Version: 2:3.3.17-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Preparing to
Package: dahdi-dkms
Version: 1:2.11.1.0.20170917~dfsg-7
Severity: serious
I just found this in dahdi's dkms.log:
make -C drivers/dahdi/firmware firmware-loaders
make[1]: Entering directory
'/var/lib/dkms/dahdi/DEB_VERSION/build/drivers/dahdi/firmware'
Attempting to download dahdi-fwload-vpmadt03
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 982380 https://github.com/vlasovskikh/funcparserlib/issues/64
Bug #982380 [src:funcparserlib] funcparserlib: Package contains
dfsg-incompatible documentation files
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/vlasovskikh/funcpar
yubioath-desktop got a fix that works with both ykman version 3 and
verison 4.
I have sent a MR on salsa to include the new upstream version (there are
also updates in the pristine-tar and upstream branches).
I have confirmed that the new version works with both ykman, and after I
have updated to
Source: funcparserlib
Severity: serious
Justification: non-free software in main (2.2.1)
Hello!
The following files in the doc directory are covered by a license that is
non-free
(non-compatible with DFSG), see [1] and [2]:
- Brackets.md
- Illustrated.md
- Tutorial.md
These files need to be re
Hi Steve,
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 08:39:53PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
[...]
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy : Depends: shim-unsigned (=
> > 15+1533136
Source: gatos
Version: 0.0.5-19
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs bullseye sid patch
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/i386/gatos.html
...
/usr/bin/ld: .libs/libgatos.la-13.o:(.bss+0x540): multiple definition of
`gatos_mixer_names'; .libs/sound.o:(.bss+0x80): first defined
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 dahdi-dkms: breaks building other dkms modules
Bug #982334 [dahdi-dkms] iptables-netflow-dkms: fails to build module for Linux
5.10
Changed Bug title to 'dahdi-dkms: breaks building other dkms modules' from
'iptables-netflow-dkms: fails to build module f
Control: retitle -1 dahdi-dkms: breaks building other dkms modules
Control: tag -1 sid bullseye
On 2/9/21 2:50 AM, Axel Beckert wrote:
>> Installing dahdi-dkms seems to break building other dkms kernel modules.
>
> Nice find!
>
> I was about to argue that it works for me:
After getting another
Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 14:51:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#973061: fixed in nototools 0.2.13-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #973061,
regarding nototools: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b .
subprocess returned exit status 2
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 14:33:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#978388: fixed in malcontent 0.10.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #978388,
regarding malcontent: FTBFS: dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns
disappeared in the symbols file: see diff output bel
I filed Debian Bug #982372 "manpages-de: procps: File sconflict
between procps and manpages-de".
To quote from [0]:
On d-u I see:
root# RELEASE="buildd-unstable" ; LC_ALL=C apt-get dist-upgrade -V -t $RELEASE
...
The following packages will be REMOVED:
manpages-de (4.9.1-1)
task-german (3.
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 08:15:38PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:03:14PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2020-05-28 09:04, YunQiang Su wrote:
> > > Adrian Bunk 于2020年5月21日周四 下午3:40写道：
> > > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 06:41:34AM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> > > > > A
Hi Laurent,
On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 11:03:41PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols
> > file: see diff output below
> > dpkg-gensymbols: warning: debian/libmalcontent-ui-0-0/DEBIAN/symbols
> > doesn't match completely debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 979717 important
Bug #979717 [snapd] Move snapd from main to contrib or non-free
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
979717: https://bugs.debian.org
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #981764 [src:black] autopkg tests should neither use easy_install nor pip
Added tag(s) patch.
> severity -1 serious
Bug #981764 [src:black] autopkg tests should neither use easy_install nor pip
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
98176
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #981766 [src:python-b2sdk] autopkg tests failing with setuptools 52.0
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
981766: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=981766
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit
Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 10:03:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#979970: fixed in libselinux 3.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #979970,
regarding libselinux1: dependency to newer libc6 ignored by/missing for aptitude
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #981769 [src:libcloud] autopkg tests failing with setuptools 52.0
Added tag(s) patch.
> severity -1 serious
Bug #981769 [src:libcloud] autopkg tests failing with setuptools 52.0
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
981769: https://bugs.
Hi all,
Am 07.02.2021 22:51, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Added now explicitly.
well, thanks. I can't wait to participate in this discussion.
My stance on this: In theory it should be technically possible to
replace the gsfonts (and gsfonts-x11) package with fonts-urw-base35 and
I believe this
Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2021 08:22:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#978032: fixed in python-cobra 0.21.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #978032,
regarding python-cobra: autopkgtest regression in testing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
82 matches
Mail list logo
