Your message dated Wed, 24 Jun 2020 08:56:05 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#962743: cnvkit FTBFS on mips64el/ppc64el: test failure
has caused the Debian Bug report #962743,
regarding cnvkit FTBFS on mips64el/ppc64el: test failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Michael,
you did the last update of this package. The bug is blocking testing
migration of python-biopython which creates regularly a lot of noise.
Could you confirm that you are working on this or do you need help?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Package: sysdig
Version: 0.26.7-2
Severity: grave
Hi. sysdig used to work, but now it doesn't. I'm running Debian/sid, so
probably something about my set of dependencies doesn't agree with
sysdig, but we should figure out what that is.
Earlier today I was seeing a segfault when running some older
Your message dated Wed, 24 Jun 2020 04:33:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#955156: fixed in libopenshot 0.2.5+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #955156,
regarding python3-openshot: Installation broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Hi,
> the OpenSSL ./. GPL problem (if one sees it as a problem) is larger
There may be an alternative for some cases mentioned here. The wolfSSL
encryption library is a FIPS-certified, commercial product with a
fully usable, although incomplete, OpenSSL compatibility layer. The
developers are ver
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 16:36, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> Hello, as you can see, two tests can't be run on ppc64el and s390x, because
> of missing:
> g++-arm-linux-gnueabihf and ldc
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/ppc64el/m/meson/6017346/log.gz
> Marking the two tests as "sk
Hi,
Thanks for the report. I've found an existing patch upstream for these
pycodestyle violations.
I've packaged the patch in urlwatch-2.18-2 and uploaded the package to
mentors.
Regards,
Maxime
Le dim. 21 juin 2020 à 22:09, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Source: urlwatch
> Version: 2.18-1
> Seve
reassign 963320 gyp
found 963320 0.1+20200513gitcaa6002-1
affects 963320 src:libtgvoip
stop
On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 22:04 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > make[1]: Entering di
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 963320 gyp
Bug #963320 [src:libtgvoip] libtgvoip: FTBFS: AttributeError: module 'string'
has no attribute 'maketrans'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:libtgvoip' to 'gyp'.
No longer marked as found in versions libtgvoip/2.4.4-2.
Ignoring
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 963557 by 961203
Bug #963557 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src:ensmallen]
src:ensmallen: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS
armel/armhf/mipsel
963557 was not blocked by any bugs.
963557 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s)
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:37:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963168: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #651313,
regarding desktopnova-module-gnome: desktopnova seems to be not compatible with
Gnome 3
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:38:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963550: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938923,
regarding zyne: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:38:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963550: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #807648,
regarding zyne: Fails to start (missing dep for wx?)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:36:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963096: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #943275,
regarding snetz: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:36:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963097: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #937212,
regarding opensips: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:35:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963095: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #943268,
regarding woof: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:34:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#962985: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #937437,
regarding pyfeed: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:35:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#962986: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #947278,
regarding xmlelements: missing Build-Depends: dh-python
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:34:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#962985: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #947448,
regarding pyfeed: missing Build-Depends: dh-python
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:34:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#962983: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #889019,
regarding gnome-doc-utils: is deprecated
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:33:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#962950: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #962040,
regarding boost1.67: Can not (and should not) fulfill the build dependencies
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:35:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#962986: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938850,
regarding xmlelements: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Processing control commands:
> close -1 2.12.1-1
Bug #963557 [src:ensmallen] src:ensmallen: fails to migrate to testing for too
long: FTBFS armel/armhf/mipsel
Marked as fixed in versions ensmallen/2.12.1-1.
Bug #963557 [src:ensmallen] src:ensmallen: fails to migrate to testing for too
long: FTBF
Source: ensmallen
Version: 2.12.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.12.1-1
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: blocks -1 by 961203
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-o
Source: gxr
Version: 0.13.2-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.14.0-4
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 959608
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync
Processing control commands:
> close -1 0.14.0-4
Bug #963556 [src:gxr] src:gxr: fails to migrate to testing for too long:
unfixed RC bug
Marked as fixed in versions gxr/0.14.0-4.
Bug #963556 [src:gxr] src:gxr: fails to migrate to testing for too long:
unfixed RC bug
Marked Bug as done
> block -1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 953615 https://github.com/borgbackup/borg/issues/4829
Bug #953615 {Done: Andrej Shadura } [borgbackup]
borgbackup: index corruption / data loss
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/borgbackup/borg/issues/4829'.
> thanks
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 20:28:57 +0200
with message-id <5b911f5d-b81c-ea8b-2d41-1e5685d2d...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#963241: primus-nvidia: Failed to load libGL
has caused the Debian Bug report #963241,
regarding primus-nvidia: Failed to load libGL
to be marked as done.
Th
Processing control commands:
> close -1 3.0.9+dfsg1-1
Bug #963555 [src:xpra] src:xpra: fails to migrate to testing for too long:
FTBFS armel/armhf
Marked as fixed in versions xpra/3.0.9+dfsg1-1.
Bug #963555 [src:xpra] src:xpra: fails to migrate to testing for too long:
FTBFS armel/armhf
Marked B
Processing control commands:
> close -1 11.0.7+10-3
Bug #963554 [src:openjdk-11] src:openjdk-11: fails to migrate to testing for
too long: FTBFS on armel & mips*el
Marked as fixed in versions openjdk-11/11.0.7+10-3.
Bug #963554 [src:openjdk-11] src:openjdk-11: fails to migrate to testing for
too
Source: openjdk-11
Version: 11.0.7+9-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 11.0.7+10-3
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between testing
Source: xpra
Version: 3.0.7+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.0.9+dfsg1-1
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 956822
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are o
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:04:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#962763: fixed in renderdoc 1.8+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #962763,
regarding renderdoc FTBFS: undefined references to spvtools symbols
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
> I mentioned this in a previous email: the problem is if the upgrade
> breaks and the admin has to consult man pages to work out how to fix
> it.
> (I did just that less than an hour ago in another situation, so I
> don't
> think this is a theoretical concern.)
Another good point, thanks for clar
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:49:26 +0200
with message-id <20200623184926.8874b811f379c57b2428f...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#963372: console-setup: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: col: not
found
has caused the Debian Bug report #963372,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
t
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:49:26 +0200
with message-id <20200623184926.8874b811f379c57b2428f...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#963372: console-setup: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: col: not
found
has caused the Debian Bug report #963372,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
t
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:49:26 +0200
with message-id <20200623184926.8874b811f379c57b2428f...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#963372: console-setup: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: col: not
found
has caused the Debian Bug report #963372,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
t
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:49:26 +0200
with message-id <20200623184926.8874b811f379c57b2428f...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#963372: console-setup: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: col: not
found
has caused the Debian Bug report #963372,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
t
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:49:26 +0200
with message-id <20200623184926.8874b811f379c57b2428f...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#963372: console-setup: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: col: not
found
has caused the Debian Bug report #963372,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
t
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:49:26 +0200
with message-id <20200623184926.8874b811f379c57b2428f...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#963372: console-setup: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: col: not
found
has caused the Debian Bug report #963372,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
t
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:49:26 +0200
with message-id <20200623184926.8874b811f379c57b2428f...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#963372: console-setup: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: col: not
found
has caused the Debian Bug report #963372,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
t
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:49:26 +0200
with message-id <20200623184926.8874b811f379c57b2428f...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#963372: console-setup: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: col: not
found
has caused the Debian Bug report #963372,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
t
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:49:26 +0200
with message-id <20200623184926.8874b811f379c57b2428f...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#963372: console-setup: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: col: not
found
has caused the Debian Bug report #963372,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
t
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:49:26 +0200
with message-id <20200623184926.8874b811f379c57b2428f...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#963372: console-setup: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: col: not
found
has caused the Debian Bug report #963372,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
t
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:49:26 +0200
with message-id <20200623184926.8874b811f379c57b2428f...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#963372: console-setup: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: col: not
found
has caused the Debian Bug report #963372,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
t
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:49:26 +0200
with message-id <20200623184926.8874b811f379c57b2428f...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#963372: console-setup: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: col: not
found
has caused the Debian Bug report #963372,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
t
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:49:26 +0200
with message-id <20200623184926.8874b811f379c57b2428f...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#963372: console-setup: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: col: not
found
has caused the Debian Bug report #963372,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
t
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:49:26 +0200
with message-id <20200623184926.8874b811f379c57b2428f...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#963372: console-setup: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: col: not
found
has caused the Debian Bug report #963372,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
t
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:49:26 +0200
with message-id <20200623184926.8874b811f379c57b2428f...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#963372: console-setup: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: col: not
found
has caused the Debian Bug report #963372,
regarding re2c: FTBFS: src/msg/help.cc:3:1: error: ex
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:49:26 +0200
with message-id <20200623184926.8874b811f379c57b2428f...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#963372: console-setup: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: col: not
found
has caused the Debian Bug report #963372,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
t
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:49:26 +0200
with message-id <20200623184926.8874b811f379c57b2428f...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#963372: console-setup: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: col: not
found
has caused the Debian Bug report #963372,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
t
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:49:26 +0200
with message-id <20200623184926.8874b811f379c57b2428f...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#963372: console-setup: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: col: not
found
has caused the Debian Bug report #963372,
regarding bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 963427 = ding bsdmainutils
Bug #963427 {Done: Roland Rosenfeld } [ding] bsdmainutils
must depend on bsdextrautils
Removed indication that 963427 affects src:ding, src:sendmail, src:mcl,
src:console-setup, src:ocp, src:calc, src:libdap, s
#963550
Thanks,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 08:54:46AM -0400, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote:
> Yes, please. And sorry for the MIA on this.
>
> I'm doing the RFP later today.
>
> Bests,
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 11:09:27PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 11:25:07PM -0400,
For now this is "fixed" with -unsafe-string in 3.1.7
--
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 01:39:29PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > man would be broken between the end of step 1 and the end of step 5.
> > I think this is undesirable and unnecessary.
>
> Good points. However, I still don't see where this creates problems in
> the upgrade p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unblock 963158 with 963327
Bug #963158 [src:re2c] re2c: CVE-2020-11958
963158 was blocked by: 963442 963383 963377 963403 963359 963349 963355 963451
963413 963376 963372 963365 963306 963448 963361 963327 963378 963375 963395
963350
963158 was
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 963478 + lynkeos.app pikopixel.app price.app
Bug #963478 [libgnustep-gui0.28] libgnustep-gui0.28: Missing sentinel in
+[NSPDFImageRep imagePasteboardTypes] crashes applications
Added indication that 963478 affects lynkeos.app, pikopixel.a
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:49:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#888164: fixed in ruby-packable 1.3.14-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #888164,
regarding ruby-packable: FTBFS on ruby2.5: Illegal seek @ rb_io_tell
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
> I'm doing the RFP later today.
Request for Removal I meant.
Bests,
> Bests,
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 11:09:27PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 11:25:07PM -0400, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote:
> > > Hi, sorry for the long delay.
> > >
> > > I'm doing a (late) cle
Source: meson
Version: 0.54.3-1
Severity: serious
Hello, as you can see, two tests can't be run on ppc64el and s390x, because of
missing:
g++-arm-linux-gnueabihf and ldc
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/ppc64el/m/meson/6017346/log.gz
Marking the two tests as "skip-not-installed" wo
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 02:26:51PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
>...
> > The majority of users are using the default of treating Recommends
> > as dependencies, for them it doesn't make any difference whether
> > Recommends or Depends is used.
> >
> > Not installing Recommends is supported, and de
Yes, please. And sorry for the MIA on this.
I'm doing the RFP later today.
Bests,
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 11:09:27PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 11:25:07PM -0400, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote:
> > Hi, sorry for the long delay.
> >
> > I'm doing a (late) cleanup in my
> Build breakage out of the void is not nice, usually maintainers
> inform
> reverse build dependencies them before making such a breaking change.
Yes, correct, and I'm sorry about this. It simply didn't occur to me
that the change would create a build breakage.
> The majority of users are using
On Mon, 2020-06-22 at 10:57 -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> I would be happy to help on artemis. Obviously I will need
> a more experienced developer helping me. :)
do not hesitate to ask for help on mailing list, I'll keep an eye on
it.
I have very few spare time to manage this f
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:48:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963384: fixed in gnome-desktop3 3.36.3.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #963384,
regarding gnome-desktop3: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu
&& LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 MESON_TESTTHREADS=4 ninja te
> > Any idea how this scenario could unfold? I cannot imagine how it
> > could
> > get there. What I will do, though, is add a "Breaks: man-db
> > (<<2.9.3-
> > 1)" to bsdmainutils. Actually this is already in git.
>
> Breaks only ensures that new bsdmainutils can't be unpacked until
> man-db
> is
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 02:03:10PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > I already updated the title of the mass-merged bug to
> > "bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils".
> >
> > This is anyway mandatory for not breaking upgrades from buster.
>
> Would you care to elaborate? I didn't find anythin
Processing control commands:
> close -1
Bug #963538 [ubuntu-dev-tools] reverse-depends command is broken because
qa.ubuntuwire.org is down
Marked Bug as done
--
963538: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963538
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem
control: close -1
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:25:08 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> Package: ubuntu-dev-tools
> Version: 0.176
> Severity: grave
> Justification: ships a broken command
>
> reverse-depends command queries qa.ubuntuwire.org which is down. This
> is a very useful command and we should g
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:05:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#962158: fixed in lintian 2.81.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #962158,
regarding lintian: Swapped exit statuses and --fail-on default value require
downstream adjustments
to be marked as done.
This means t
Control: found -1 1:3.9-3
Hi,
This error is still occurring:
> Unpacking libmu-dbm6:amd64 (1:3.9-3) ...
> dpkg: error processing archive
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libmu-dbm6_1%3a3.9-3_amd64.deb (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmu_dbm.so.6.0.0', which is
> also i
Processing control commands:
> found -1 1:3.9-3
Bug #963211 {Done: Jordi Mallach } [libmu-dbm6] libmu-dbm6:
Tries to overwrite `libmu_dbm.so.6.0.0` from `libmailutils6`
Marked as found in versions mailutils/1:3.9-3; no longer marked as fixed in
versions mailutils/1:3.9-3 and reopened.
--
96321
The original crash was fixed in facter 3.11.0-4.2 for me.
Le 23/06/2020 à 12:01, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit :
> Source: npm
> Version: 6.14.5+ds-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello, looks like npm is failing again its autopkgtests...
>
> On armhf there is a timeout that I "fixed" with:
> https://github.com/npm/cli/pull/1454
>
> on ppc64el there is anot
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 11:02:02AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > However, in order to make buster → bullseye upgrades work properly,
> > I think it's necessary to have bsdmainutils depend on bsdextrautils
> > for at least one release cycle. Otherwise there may be a point
>
Il 13/06/20 11:05, Giovanni Mascellani ha scritto:
> No problems in line of principle, but I am not sure I understand what
> would this solve: the conflict between two different versions of Boost
> arises when the same executable links against both (through different
> dependencies). There is no pr
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 12:19:03 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Fixed on the python side
has caused the Debian Bug report #954582,
regarding FTBFS: fatal error: stropts.h: No such file or directory
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:19:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#963300: fixed in qscintilla2 2.11.2+dfsg-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #963300,
regarding qscintilla2: FTBFS: sipQscipart0.cpp:68074:37: error: no matching
function for call to ‘QsciAPIs::QsciAPIs()’
to b
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #963300 [src:qscintilla2] qscintilla2: FTBFS: sipQscipart0.cpp:68074:37:
error: no matching function for call to ‘QsciAPIs::QsciAPIs()’
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #963300 to the same tags previously set
--
963300: https://bugs.debian.
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #963300 in qscintilla2 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/qscintilla2/-/commit/6ea69788b5c0a
Hi Sebastian,
if you look at my DDPO page I have *lots* of packages. I really like if
people are doing sensible work (as you did) *without* my interaction.
I'm really happy if you NMU (that's why I confirmed) or perhaps do a
team upload. Any help is welcome and I do not want to fiddle around wit
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #963300 in qscintilla2 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/qscintilla2/-/commit/6ea69788b5c0a
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #963300 [src:qscintilla2] qscintilla2: FTBFS: sipQscipart0.cpp:68074:37:
error: no matching function for call to ‘QsciAPIs::QsciAPIs()’
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #963300 to the same tags previously set
--
963300: https://bugs.debian.
Source: npm
Version: 6.14.5+ds-1
Severity: serious
Hello, looks like npm is failing again its autopkgtests...
On armhf there is a timeout that I "fixed" with:
https://github.com/npm/cli/pull/1454
on ppc64el there is another failure:
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/ppc64el/n/npm/
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #963300 in qscintilla2 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/qscintilla2/-/commit/6ea69788b5c0a
Package: ubuntu-dev-tools
Version: 0.176
Severity: grave
Justification: ships a broken command
reverse-depends command queries qa.ubuntuwire.org which is down. This
is a very useful command and we should get the service up again or
possibly run on debian infra if it is down permanently.
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #963300 [src:qscintilla2] qscintilla2: FTBFS: sipQscipart0.cpp:68074:37:
error: no matching function for call to ‘QsciAPIs::QsciAPIs()’
Added tag(s) pending.
--
963300: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963300
Debian Bug Tracking
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # fix meta data
> reassign 963153 r-cran-av 0.5.0+dfsg-3
Bug #963153 [src:ffmpeg, src:r-cran-av] ffmpeg breaks r-cran-av autopkgtest:
error in 'avcodec_open2 (audio)': Invalid argument
Bug reassigned from package 'src:ffmpeg, src:r-cran-av' to 'r
On 2020-06-23 11:15:52 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:50:50AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Control: notfound -1 ffmpeg/7:4.3-2
> > Control: tags -1 + patch
> >
> > Hi Andreas
> >
> > ...
> > The attached patch fixes this issue by generting an e
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 963395 man-db
Bug #963395 [bsdmainutils] bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
Bug reassigned from package 'bsdmainutils' to 'man-db'.
No longer marked as found in versions bsdmainutils/12.1.1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #963534 [src:flatbuffers] flatbuffers: FTBFS on alpha and hurd
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
963534: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963534
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pro
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 963395
Bug #963395 [man-db] bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
963395: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963395
Debia
Control: severity -1 important
Dear Vasyl
On 2020-06-23 09:31:25 +, Vasyl Gello wrote:
> Source: flatbuffers
> Version: debian/1.11.0+dfsg1-1.5
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> M
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #963384 [src:gnome-desktop3] gnome-desktop3: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd
obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 MESON_TESTTHREADS=4 ninja test returned
exit code 1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
963384: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #963384 in gnome-desktop3 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-desktop/-/commit/ad3398cf00417a857
Source: flatbuffers
Version: debian/1.11.0+dfsg1-1.5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Dear colleagues,
My previous symbol adjustment for buster made flatbuffers to show in my personal
package page. Exploring it, I r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unmerge 963395
Bug #963395 [bsdmainutils] bsdmainutils must depend on bsdextrautils
Bug #963306 [bsdmainutils] re2c: FTBFS: src/msg/help.cc:3:1: error: expected
primary-expression before ‘;’ token
Bug #963327 [bsdmainutils] bsdmainutils must depe
Hi Sebastian,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:50:50AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: notfound -1 ffmpeg/7:4.3-2
> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> Hi Andreas
>
> ...
> The attached patch fixes this issue by generting an empty mp3 with the
> default sampling rate of 44.1 KHz during package bu
Hi,
I believe that your /etc/bumblebee/bumblebee.conf is wrong. In the
[driver-nvidia]-Section, LibraryPath should read:
LibraryPath=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/nvidia:/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/nvidia:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu:/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu
This was a change in the packaged config file i
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
