Your message dated Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:19:22 +0200
with message-id
and subject line fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #941857,
regarding Z3 4.8.4 contains cache bugs and should not be packaged
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 941857 4.8.6-1
Bug #941857 [z3] Z3 4.8.4 contains cache bugs and should not be packaged
Marked as fixed in versions z3/4.8.6-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
941857: https://bugs.debian.org
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 05:58:30AM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> shirish शिरीष:
> > Dunno if this is the right place to discuss it or not. Integri asked
> > hence sharing.
[..]
> AFAICT:
>
> - The synaptic codebase does not use libgtk2-perl directly.
> - This Recommends is historically in
Hi,
On 10/13/19 11:16 PM, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 11:02:45PM +0200, Birger Schacht wrote:
>> The problem is that the package will be removed from unstable in a
>> couple of days because of this bug report. 3 month is sometimes not that
>> much time to fix a bug or even comment
Your message dated Mon, 14 Oct 2019 07:43:28 +0200
with message-id <9215076f-27a1-37c5-00ab-9fef31bd2...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: llvm-toolchain-9: Fails to compile on i386
has caused the Debian Bug report #942229,
regarding llvm-toolchain-9: Fails to compile on i386
to be marked as done.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 936189 serious
Bug #936189 [src:bcfg2] bcfg2: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 936189 to the same value.
> severity 937068 serious
Bug #937068 [src:moosic] moosic: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
On 2019-10-13 14:32:01, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 12:15 PM Chris Lamb wrote:
> >
> > Thanks. Unfortunately, I don't quite know why this is happening. (The
> > tests on Salsa appear to pass right now.)
>
> Some test scripts appear to load old profiles. They
Your message dated Mon, 14 Oct 2019 05:01:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#935745: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #935745,
regarding RM: python-pushy -- RoQA; python2 only; dead upstream; low popcon;
last upload in 2015
to be marked as done.
This m
Your message dated Mon, 14 Oct 2019 05:02:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#941338: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #933438,
regarding spek: Please rebuild against wxWidgets GTK 3 package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 935745 ftp.debian.org
Bug #935745 [python-pushy] python-pushy: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package 'python-pushy' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions python-pushy/0.5.1-1.1.
Ignoring request
Package: python3-exif
Version: 2.2.0-3
Severity: serious
Hello,
since this package installs a module called `exifread` the binary package name
should be python3-exifread not python3-exif.
Since it violates the policy, severity is set to serious.
Regards,
Sandro
-- System Information:
Debian Rel
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 at 09:30, gregor herrmann wrote:
> libsnmp-perl is broken.
>
Ouch, I don't use the module (or Perl much for that matter) but that's very
broken. No idea what's going on but it worries me that
netsnmp_ds_get_boolean is the first function in that module which means a
coincidence
Package: libsnmp-perl
Version: 5.8+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
As noticed by some autopkgtest and build failures, e.g.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libsnmp-info-perl
libsnmp-perl is broken.
Minim
Hi Sebastian,
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 12:15 PM Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> Thanks. Unfortunately, I don't quite know why this is happening. (The
> tests on Salsa appear to pass right now.)
Some test scripts appear to load old profiles. They are presumably
located in the installed location /usr/share/l
Hello,
FYI, I'm orphaning php-horde-* packages. See:
https://bugs.debian.org/942282
Regards
--
Mathieu Parent
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 11:02:45PM +0200, Birger Schacht wrote:
> The problem is that the package will be removed from unstable in a
> couple of days because of this bug report. 3 month is sometimes not that
> much time to fix a bug or even comment on a bug report. And the release
> of bullseye is
Package: libapache2-mod-ruid2
Version: 0.9.8-3
Severity: grave
The package libapache2-mod-ruid2 is completely missing from Debian 10
(Buster) repositories, what's the problem why is it missing ?
It's available in previous releases and the the unstable release (SID)
but not Buster
jessie (httpd
Hi,
On 10/13/19 10:02 PM, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 05:23:40PM +0200, Birger Schacht wrote:
>> Robie, could you please point out the part of the Debian policy that
>> this package is violating?
>
> I cannot. I believe that this issue is such a clear violation of
> Debian's phil
Hello
Similar issues were discussed in:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726998
You could also find that Lintian folks uses several levels of error
tags to describe this problem, for instance:
*
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/privacy-breach-statistics-website.html.
It is cons
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 07:20:35PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> It is maintained. It is just that the latest upload is blocked by DBug:
> #938962
No, it is not maintained. It depends on packages not longer in the
archive.
Regards,
Bastian
--
Bones: "The man's DEAD, Jim!"
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 05:23:40PM +0200, Birger Schacht wrote:
> Robie, could you please point out the part of the Debian policy that
> this package is violating?
I cannot. I believe that this issue is such a clear violation of
Debian's philosophy that it has never been necessary to document it
f
Your message dated Sun, 13 Oct 2019 19:47:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#940547: fixed in python-cryptography 1.7.1-3+deb9u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #940547,
regarding python-cryptography: Testsuite fails with OpenSSL 1.1.1d
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 13 Oct 2019 19:47:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#934519: fixed in fence-agents 4.0.25-1+deb9u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #934519,
regarding fence-agents: FTBFS in stretch/buster/sid (ImportError: No module
named pywsman)
to be marked as done.
This me
Processing control commands:
> found -1 golang-github-hashicorp-go-retryablehttp/0.6.2-1
Bug #942279 [src:golang-github-hashicorp-go-retryablehttp,
src:golang-github-circonus-labs-circonus-gometrics]
golang-github-hashicorp-go-retryablehttp breaks
golang-github-circonus-labs-circonus-gometrics
Source: golang-github-hashicorp-go-retryablehttp,
golang-github-circonus-labs-circonus-gometrics
Control: found -1 golang-github-hashicorp-go-retryablehttp/0.6.2-1
Control: found -1 golang-github-circonus-labs-circonus-gometrics/2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@
Your message dated Sun, 13 Oct 2019 19:34:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#941487: fixed in gconf 3.2.6-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #941487,
regarding gconf: autopkgtest fails with libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.62)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Hi Matthias,
On Saturday, October 12, 2019 12:34:30 PM CDT Matthias Klose wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> Control: severity -1 grave
>
> please could you attach the binary, or put it somewhere on the web?
>
Sorry, which binary are you referring to?
Here are a few links in the meantime t
There has been some discussion about #936299 on the upstream mailing list, and
there have been a few upstream commits starting to port the code to Python3.
http://intrepid.danplanet.com/pipermail/chirp_devel/2019-August/005580.html
-- Chris, KB2IQN
--
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us
Your message dated Sun, 13 Oct 2019 19:17:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#933163: fixed in cyrus-imapd 3.0.8-6+deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #933163,
regarding cyrus-imapd: Data loss possible when upgrading to buster
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Sun, 13 Oct 2019 19:17:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#941955: fixed in open-vm-tools 2:10.3.10-1+deb10u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #941955,
regarding memory leaks in open-vm-tools
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Sun, 13 Oct 2019 19:17:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#939877: fixed in rpcbind 1.2.5-0.3+deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #939877,
regarding rpcbind: Does not receive any broadcast queries resulting in complete
breakage of NIS
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sun, 13 Oct 2019 19:17:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#934519: fixed in fence-agents 4.3.3-2+deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #934519,
regarding fence-agents: FTBFS in stretch/buster/sid (ImportError: No module
named pywsman)
to be marked as done.
This me
Your message dated Sun, 13 Oct 2019 19:17:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#940547: fixed in python-cryptography 2.6.1-3+deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #940547,
regarding python-cryptography: Testsuite fails with OpenSSL 1.1.1d
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 13 Oct 2019 19:17:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#939877: fixed in rpcbind 1.2.5-0.3+deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #939877,
regarding rpcbind: Broadcast requests broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
retitle 942252 lintian: No vendor given at
/<>/lib/Lintian/Maintainer.pm line 33
thanks
Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=lintian&arch=all&ver=2.26.0&stamp=1570670200&raw=0
Thanks. Unfortunately, I don't quite know why this is happening. (The
tests on Sa
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 942252 lintian: No vendor given at
> /<>/lib/Lintian/Maintainer.pm line 33
Bug #942252 [src:lintian] lintian: t/scripts/pod-synopsis.t: (Wstat: 256 Tests:
66 Failed: 1)
Changed Bug title to 'lintian: No vendor given at
/<>/lib/Lintian/M
Your message dated Sun, 13 Oct 2019 19:04:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#940069: fixed in gr-limesdr 2.0.0-27-gca01a64-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #940069,
regarding gr-limesdr: FTBFS in unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 940069 gr-limesdr: FTBFS in unstable
Bug #940069 [gr-limesdr] gr-limsdr FTBFS in unstable.
Changed Bug title to 'gr-limesdr: FTBFS in unstable' from 'gr-limsdr FTBFS in
unstable.'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Looks like makehuman upstream is working on the Qt5 version but it hasn't
finished yet. There's only alpha versions at
https://github.com/makehumancommunity/makehuman . I guess we should move on
and have it removed if upstream is acting that slowly.
Muammar: if you have any other thoughts, please
Source: libmessage-passing-perl
Version: 0.116-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs sid bullseye
Justification: fails to build from source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
As seen on
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/libm/libmessage-passing-perl/3150247/log.gz
we ha
On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 19:01:19 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Currently this only happens in unstable, and I haven't yet seen why.
Maybe yesterday's upload of libnamespace-autoclean-perl?
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org
: :' : Op
Source: libmoox-options-perl
Version: 4.103-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs sid bullseye
Justification: fails to build from source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
As first seen on ci.debian.net, libmoox-options-perl has a test
failure which also makes the package FTBFS:
https://c
Hi,
On 8/18/19 3:21 PM, Robie Basak wrote:
> Package: lynis
> Version: 2.6.2-1
> Severity: serious
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities says:
> serious is a severe violation of Debian policy (roughly, it violates a
> "must" or "required" directive)"
Robie, could you please point out
Source: tasksel
Severity: grave
task-spanish depends on manpages-es, which has been removed from the archive.
Cheers,
Moritz
Your message dated Sun, 13 Oct 2019 15:32:28 +
with message-id <20191013153228.ga...@jelmer.uk>
and subject line Resolved
has caused the Debian Bug report #942039,
regarding loggerhead: not co-installable with loggerhead-breezy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/ossimlabs/ossim/issues/243
Bug #942269 [src:ossim] ossim: FTBFS with GEOS 3.8.0 (error: no matching
function for call)
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/ossimlabs/ossim/issues/243'.
--
942269: https://bugs.debian.o
Source: ossim
Version: 2.9.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ossimlabs/ossim/issues/243
Dear Maintainer,
Your package FTBFS with GEOS 3.8.0:
/build/ossim-2.9.1/src/base/ossimPolyArea2d
Your message dated Sun, 13 Oct 2019 15:16:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#942186: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #933445,
regarding sandboxgamemaker: Please rebuild against wxWidgets GTK 3 package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Sun, 13 Oct 2019 15:15:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#941180: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #933408,
regarding usbprog: Please rebuild against wxWidgets GTK 3 package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Sun, 13 Oct 2019 15:18:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#942264: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #875219,
regarding [unixodbc-gui-qt] Future Qt4 removal from Buster
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Sun, 13 Oct 2019 15:15:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#941153: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #934248,
regarding Should this package be removed?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Sun, 13 Oct 2019 15:17:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#942263: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #875172,
regarding [rlplot] Future Qt4 removal from Buster
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Sun, 13 Oct 2019 15:16:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#941240: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #933411,
regarding fwknop-gui: Please rebuild against wxWidgets GTK 3 package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 13 Oct 2019 15:16:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#942186: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #764896,
regarding sandboxgamemaker: sandbox_unix fails to start, "cannot find core
textures"
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Hi.
On Sun, 2019-10-06 at 18:18 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-10-06 at 15:35 +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > The reason it's still there is in the cruft report:
>
> Sorry, I didn't realise that was something I could look up.
>
> > - broken Build-Depends:
> > user-mode-linux:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:06:20PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> Hi! We have seen no activity in this bug, should we file a removal bug?
>
> Cheers, Lisandro.
I've filed a removal bug now.
Cheers,
Moritz
On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 10:41:07PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 11:09:19PM +0200, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> wrote:
> > Source: rlplot
> > Version: 1.5-3
> > Severity: wishlist
> > User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: qt4-removal
> >
> >
> >
Your message dated Sun, 13 Oct 2019 10:00:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#931880: fixed in slurm-llnl 19.05.3.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #931880,
regarding slurm-llnl: CVE-2019-12838
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Le 13 octobre 2019 01:04:46 GMT+02:00, "Pierre-Elliott Bécue"
a écrit :
>Le jeudi 03 octobre 2019 à 11:50:48+0200, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
>> Quoting Alexandre Rossi (2019-10-02 15:04:54)
>> > > > > > Do you have plans/solutions regarding this issue? Is it
>possible
>> > > > > > to drop uw
Your message dated Sun, 13 Oct 2019 10:00:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#925627: fixed in adplug 2.3.1+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #925627,
regarding adplug: ftbfs with GCC-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Source: lintian
Version: 2.26.0
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs sid bullseye
Justification: fails to build from source
lintian 2.26.0 failed to build on the arch all buildd:
| Test Summary Report
| ---
| t/scripts/pod-synopsis.t
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 06:16:48PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
This package failed to build from source on arm64, mips64el, ppc64el
and s390x, but earlier versions built there successfully in the past.
This is preventing 1.16.1-1 testing migration and is a blocker for
the ongoing Perl 5.30 transitio
Your message dated Sun, 13 Oct 2019 07:19:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#941124: fixed in elixir-lang 1.9.1.dfsg-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #941124,
regarding elixir-lang (autopkgtest) fails with new erlang
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
63 matches
Mail list logo
