Bug#932855: e2fsprogs 1.45.3-1 breaks initramfs-tools-core <=0.133

2019-07-23 Thread jim_p
Package: e2fsprogs Version: 1.44.5-1 Followup-For: Bug #932855 I know it will sound like a support question, but please help me. I have 2 pcs, one with debian unstable i386 and one with debian testing amd64. Obviously, the first one was hit by that bug earlier today. Because I have no optical dri

Bug#932882: python3-pyroute2: /usr/bin/ss2 shipped in both packages

2019-07-23 Thread Felix Geyer
Package: python3-pyroute2 Version: 0.5.4-1 Severity: serious /usr/bin/ss2 is shipped in python-pyroute2 and python3-pyroute2 without any kind of Conflicts/Replaces resulting in an error when trying to install both packages: > Preparing to unpack .../10-python-pyroute2_0.5.4-1_all.deb ... > Unpack

Processed: Re: Bug#932881: add dependency on logsave

2019-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 e2fsprogs 1.45.3-1 Bug #932881 [initramfs-tools] add dependency on logsave Bug reassigned from package 'initramfs-tools' to 'e2fsprogs'. No longer marked as found in versions initramfs-tools/0.133. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #932881 t

Bug#932881: add dependency on logsave

2019-07-23 Thread Sven Joachim
Control: reassign -1 e2fsprogs 1.45.3-1 Control: forcemerge 932861 -1 On 2019-07-24 08:32 +0300, Aleksi Suhonen wrote: > Package: initramfs-tools > Severity: grave > Version: 0.133 > > After upgrading e2fsprogs to 1.45.3-1, computer fails to boot because > rootfs fails to fsck. And fsck fails bec

Bug#932881: add dependency on logsave

2019-07-23 Thread Aleksi Suhonen
Package: initramfs-tools Severity: grave Version: 0.133 After upgrading e2fsprogs to 1.45.3-1, computer fails to boot because rootfs fails to fsck. And fsck fails because binary for logsave is missing. Or in fact, fsck doesn't fail, but the init script reports it did, because it cannot tell th

Bug#931932: fixed in ruby-mini-magick 4.9.2-1+deb10u1

2019-07-23 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey, On 24/07/19 10:53 am, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hey! > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:43:40AM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: >> Hey Salvatore, >> >> On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:07:05 + Salvatore Bonaccorso >> wrote: >>> Source: ruby-mini-magick >>> Source-Version: 4.9.2-1+deb10u1 >>> >>> We be

Bug#931932: fixed in ruby-mini-magick 4.9.2-1+deb10u1

2019-07-23 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hey! On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:43:40AM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hey Salvatore, > > On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:07:05 + Salvatore Bonaccorso > wrote: > > Source: ruby-mini-magick > > Source-Version: 4.9.2-1+deb10u1 > > > > We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version o

Bug#931932: fixed in ruby-mini-magick 4.9.2-1+deb10u1

2019-07-23 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey Salvatore, On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:07:05 + Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Source: ruby-mini-magick > Source-Version: 4.9.2-1+deb10u1 > > We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of > ruby-mini-magick, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. Where

Bug#932860: wine can not be installed after updating libglib2.0-0 to 2.61.1-2

2019-07-23 Thread fin4478 fin4478
There are same errors when trying to install wine32 4.0-2 from the Debian repository. On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:27:37 -0700 James Lu wrote: > Hi, > > It looks like you're trying to install the Wine packages from WineHQ, > which are not the same ones provided by Debian. It doesn't look like > the W

Bug#932860: wine can not be installed after updating libglib2.0-0 to 2.61.1-2

2019-07-23 Thread fin4478 fin4478
I am using the version 2.61.1-2 from the experimental repository and it does have the i386 version. I did notice that the i386 version is missing with the version 2.60. I was unsure when I wrote this bug report and used the 2.60 number.

Processed: Re: Bug#932860: wine can not be installed after updating libglib2.0-0 to 2.60

2019-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:glib2.0 Bug #932860 [wine32] wine can not be installed after updating libglib2.0-0 to 2.60 Bug reassigned from package 'wine32' to 'src:glib2.0'. No longer marked as found in versions wine/4.0-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #93286

Processed: forcibly merging 932861 932855 932859

2019-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 932861 932855 932859 Bug #932861 [e2fsprogs] boot failure because e2fsprogs should depend on logsave Bug #932855 [e2fsprogs] e2fsprogs 1.45.3-1 breaks initramfs-tools-core <=0.133 Severity set to 'critical' from 'normal' Bug #932859 [e2

Bug#932874: logsave: Insufficient Breaks/Replaces on e2fsprogs

2019-07-23 Thread Sven Joachim
Package: logsave Version: 1.45.3-1 Severity: serious Installing logsave without upgrading e2fsprogs fails: , | Preparing to unpack .../logsave_1.45.3-1_amd64.deb ... | Unpacking logsave (1.45.3-1) ... | dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/logsave_1.45.3-1_amd64.deb (--inst

Bug#932861: boot failure because e2fsprogs should depend on logsave

2019-07-23 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Thanks, Kyle. I took the liberty of bumping this to critical severity and updating the title because it breaks the whole system (failure to boot). After booting my system with the previous kernel/initramfs, I was able to install logsave, but also needed to run "update-initramfs -u" to update t

Processed: retitle 932861 to boot failure because e2fsprogs should depend on logsave

2019-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 932861 boot failure because e2fsprogs should depend on logsave Bug #932861 [e2fsprogs] e2fsprogs should depend on logsave Changed Bug title to 'boot failure because e2fsprogs should depend on logsave' from 'e2fsprogs should depend on logs

Bug#932872: [libkscreenlocker5] Doesn't lock automatically by timeout

2019-07-23 Thread Alex Volkov
Package: libkscreenlocker5 Version: 5.14.5-1 Severity: grave --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Doesn't lock automatically by timeout, which presents a security issue. Seems to work in a newly created test user setup, and randomly works sometimes in my user, but I have no idea wha

Processed: severity of 932861 is critical

2019-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 932861 critical Bug #932861 [e2fsprogs] e2fsprogs should depend on logsave Severity set to 'critical' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 932861: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin

Bug#932635: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#932635: iverilog ftbfs in unstable

2019-07-23 Thread أحمد المحمودي
On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 04:06:17PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >dh_auto_test -a > make -j1 check VERBOSE=1 > make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' > mv parse.cc.h parse.h 2>/dev/null || mv parse.hh parse.h > mv: cannot stat 'parse.hh': No such file or directory > make[1]: *** [Makefile:259:

Bug#932865: python-qrtools: not installable: depends on python2 version of zbar

2019-07-23 Thread Adam Borowski
Package: python-qrtools Version: 1.4~bzr32-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi! This package depends on python-zbar, which has already been removed as part of the python2-rm transition. This obviously makes it non-installable. Meow! -- System Information: Debian Release

Bug#932861: e2fsprogs should depend on logsave

2019-07-23 Thread Kyle Robbertze
Package: e2fsprogs Version: 1.45.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 Dear Maintainer, After upgrading e2fsprogs to 1.45.3-1, my system refused to boot with the error: > /init: line 398: logsave: not found > > The root filesystem on /dev/sda3 requires a manual fsck I was then dropped

Processed: severity of 922434 is serious

2019-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # emacsXX transitional packages have been removed, package is uninstallable > in unstable > severity 922434 serious Bug #922434 [sass-elisp] sass-elisp: Should depend on generic emacs Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping p

Bug#932856: mariadb-client-10.3: mysqldump uses 10.3 options with pre-10.3 servers and breaks

2019-07-23 Thread Daniel Fussell
Package: mariadb-client-10.3 Version: 1:10.3.15-1 Severity: critical Tags: upstream Justification: causes serious data loss Dear Maintainer, mysqldump is unable to backup triggers and routines from any pre-10.3 version server From the upstream bug-report ( https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-17

Bug#931932: marked as done (CVE-2019-13574)

2019-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jul 2019 20:48:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#931932: fixed in ruby-mini-magick 4.9.2-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #931932, regarding CVE-2019-13574 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#932833: marked as done (postgresql-11-postgis-2.5-scripts: Version 2.5.2+dfsg-1 has no content outside /usr/share/doc/)

2019-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jul 2019 20:45:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#932833: fixed in postgis 3.0.0~alpha3+dfsg-1~exp2 has caused the Debian Bug report #932833, regarding postgresql-11-postgis-2.5-scripts: Version 2.5.2+dfsg-1 has no content outside /usr/share/doc/ to be marked

Bug#932833: marked as done (postgresql-11-postgis-2.5-scripts: Version 2.5.2+dfsg-1 has no content outside /usr/share/doc/)

2019-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jul 2019 20:45:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#932833: fixed in postgis 2.5.2+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #932833, regarding postgresql-11-postgis-2.5-scripts: Version 2.5.2+dfsg-1 has no content outside /usr/share/doc/ to be marked as done. T

Bug#907020: vnstat: autopkgtest regression

2019-07-23 Thread Teemu Toivola
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 19:51:23 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > > Yes, I've read the dev ref. I also had a chat in #debian-mentors yesterday > > regarding if doing a NMU would be the correct way of proceeding in this > > case as I haven't done one before nor have I been active with Debian > > related pac

Bug#932703: marked as done (ifeffit (contrib) b-d's on pgplot5 (non-free) and ftbfs)

2019-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Jul 2019 21:37:29 +0200 with message-id <20190723193727.ga2...@mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#932703: ifeffit (contrib) b-d's on pgplot5 (non-free) and ftbfs has caused the Debian Bug report #932703, regarding ifeffit (contrib) b-d's on pgplot5 (non-free) and ftbf

Bug#932000: In testing

2019-07-23 Thread Felix Lechner
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 8:07 AM Greg Hudson wrote: > > Candidate patch here: Thank you. The update works great, although I now have problems with idmap not working on a kerberized NFSv4 mount. I write with hesitation. A week has passed and many other packages were likewise updated. My idmap issu

Bug#932833: postgresql-11-postgis-2.5-scripts: Version 2.5.2+dfsg-1 has no content outside /usr/share/doc/

2019-07-23 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 7/23/19 8:45 PM, Mark Jeffcoat wrote: > The first symptom I noticed was in psql, complaining that > > create extension postgis; > ERROR: could not open extension control file > "/usr/share/postgresql/11/extension/postgis.control": No such file or > directory > > > I believe th

Bug#932834: FTBFS: relocation R_X86_64_32 against symbol `PyVersion_Type' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC

2019-07-23 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Source: python-apt Version: 1.8.4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS User: de...@kali.org Usertags: origin-kali Trying to rebuild python-apt in unstable currently fails with: x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -pthread -shared -Wl,-O1 -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,relro -specs=/usr/share/dpkg/no-pie-lin

Bug#932833: postgresql-11-postgis-2.5-scripts: Version 2.5.2+dfsg-1 has no content outside /usr/share/doc/

2019-07-23 Thread Mark Jeffcoat
Package: postgresql-11-postgis-2.5-scripts Version: 2.5.2+dfsg-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, The first symptom I noticed was in psql, complaining that > create extension postgis; ERROR: could not open extension control file "/usr/share/post

Processed: Re: Bug#842892: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: libz3java.so: undefined symbol: Z3_solver_get_model

2019-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 grave Bug #842892 [libz3-jni] java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: libz3java.so: undefined symbol: Z3_solver_get_model Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' -- 842892: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842892 Debian Bug Tracking System Co

Bug#907020: vnstat: autopkgtest regression

2019-07-23 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Teemu, On 23-07-2019 18:06, Teemu Toivola wrote: >>> as the maintainer appears to be inactive, is a NMU [1] containing the >>> changes linked in the maintainer's previous message an acceptable solution >>> for solving this? >>> >>> [1] https://mentors.debian.net/package/vnstat (no RFS has yet b

Bug#932827: django-compat: broken with Django 2.2, FTBFS, not ready

2019-07-23 Thread Thomas Goirand
Source: django-compat Version: 1.0.15-2 Severity: serious Hi, Django-compat is broken in may ways currently. 1/ It's using the loginview function instead of the LoginView class, as per the deprecation in Django 1.11. 2/ The tests/settings.py is missing lots of declarations. 3/ Python 2 support h

Bug#931970: gphoto2: autopkgtest failure block readline migration

2019-07-23 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 7/23/19 7:17 PM, Herbert Fortes wrote: > Can you detail more what is wrong? See: https://ci.debian.net/packages/g/gphoto2/testing/amd64/ And the log files linked from there. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D

Bug#931970: gphoto2: autopkgtest failure block readline migration

2019-07-23 Thread Herbert Fortes
Hi, On Sat, 13 Jul 2019 07:49:23 +0200 Bas Couwenberg wrote: > Source: gphoto2 > Version: 2.5.20-3 > Severity: serious > Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so > > Dear Maintainer, > > The autopkgtest failures for gphoto2 are blocking the testing migration > of readl

Bug#930676: goplay: Should this package be removed?

2019-07-23 Thread Boyuan Yang
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 14:06:06 +0200 Julian Andres Klode wrote: > On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 03:17:41AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:46:30 +0200 Julian Andres Klode > > wrote: > > > Package: goplay > > > Severity: serious > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > >

Bug#907020: vnstat: autopkgtest regression

2019-07-23 Thread Teemu Toivola
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:01:54 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > On 23-07-2019 12:38, Teemu Toivola wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 11:18:27 +0200 > > Paul Gevers wrote: > > > >> On 23-08-18 10:50, Christian Göttsche wrote: > >>> How soon should a new version be uploaded? > >> > >> That is fully up to yo

Bug#932804: terminology-data: contains invalid arch specific file also contained in terminology package

2019-07-23 Thread Sebastian Reichel
Package: terminology-data Version: 1.4.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, terminology-data contains /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/terminology/tytest in 1.4.1-1 and 1.5.0-1, which is also contained in terminology (so package is not installable). Obviously an arch specific

Processed: Re: Bug#932307: multipath-tools does not update wwids file

2019-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #932307 [multipath-tools] multipath-tools does not update wwids file Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' -- 932307: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932307 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w

Bug#932307: multipath-tools does not update wwids file

2019-07-23 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Control: severity -1 important That severity was exaggerated. Works fine over here locally, with an LIO target setup. On Wed, 2019-07-17 at 15:20 +0200, root wrote: > Dear Maintainer, > > * What led up to the situation? > > New Debian 10 Buster fresh installation with HBA cards and disks > arra

Processed: r-cran-etm: autopkgtest regression: saved results mismatch

2019-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #908662 {Done: Graham Inggs } [src:r-cran-etm] r-cran-etm: autopkgtest regression: saved results mismatch Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 908662: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=908662 Debian Bug Tracking S

Bug#908662: r-cran-etm: autopkgtest regression: saved results mismatch

2019-07-23 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: severity -1 important Downgrading severity, since the autopkgtests now pass in unstable [1], to avoid autoremoval warnings in several other packages. [1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/r-cran-etm/unstable/amd64/

Bug#914731: r-bioc-biocparallel: autopkgtest regression

2019-07-23 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: severity -1 important Downgrading severity, since the autopkgtests now pass in unstable [1], to avoid autoremoval warnings in several other packages. [1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/r-bioc-biocparallel/unstable/amd64/

Processed: r-bioc-biocparallel: autopkgtest regression

2019-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #914731 {Done: Dylan Aïssi } [src:r-bioc-biocparallel] r-bioc-biocparallel: autopkgtest regression Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 914731: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914731 Debian Bug Tracking System C

Bug#907020: vnstat: autopkgtest regression

2019-07-23 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Teemu Thanks for your interest in fixing this bug. On 23-07-2019 12:38, Teemu Toivola wrote: > On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 11:18:27 +0200 > Paul Gevers wrote: > >> On 23-08-18 10:50, Christian Göttsche wrote: >>> How soon should a new version be uploaded? >> >> That is fully up to you. If you upload

Bug#932796: Non-DFSG license in dyndns.pl file

2019-07-23 Thread Joao Eriberto Mota Filho
Package: dyndns Version: 2016.1021-3 Severity: serious Tags: upstream When searching for a license inside dyndns.pl, I found the information shown below: #!/usr/bin/perl # # Copyright # # Copyright (C) 1999-2016 Jari Aalto # # License # # This program is free sof

Processed: Re: Bug#932762: fakeroot file somefile: Bad system call

2019-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen 932762 Bug #932762 {Done: Christoph Biedl } [file] fakeroot file somefile: Bad system call 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopened No longer mar

Bug#932762: fakeroot file somefile: Bad system call

2019-07-23 Thread Christoph Biedl
Control: reopen 932762 Control: severity 932762 important Control: retitle 932762 Needs a sane solution for running under LD_PRELOAD like fakeroot [ Taking Niels into the loop. I'm sorry the first approach didn't work out. ] With the problem preliminary fixed, the whole story needs some consider

Bug#932659: Reproduced on a clean chroot

2019-07-23 Thread Pirate Praveen
I was able to reproduce in a clean sid chroot. Created chroot with debootstrap, chroot to directory, install nodejs, node-y18n node -e "require('y18n');" internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:583 throw err; ^

Bug#907020: vnstat: autopkgtest regression

2019-07-23 Thread Teemu Toivola
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 11:18:27 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > On 23-08-18 10:50, Christian Göttsche wrote: > > How soon should a new version be uploaded? > > That is fully up to you. If you upload now and the issue is fixed, the > package migrates A LOT faster to testing, than if you wait. as the mai

Processed: issue with iptables -L

2019-07-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 normal Bug #932498 [iptables] iptables -L goes into uninteruptable sleep Severity set to 'normal' from 'critical' > tags -1 = moreinfo unreproducible Bug #932498 [iptables] iptables -L goes into uninteruptable sleep Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinf

Bug#932498: issue with iptables -L

2019-07-23 Thread Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
Control: severity -1 normal Control: tags -1 = moreinfo unreproducible I can't reproduce this bug: % sudo iptables -L [sudo] password for arturo: Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source