Bug#928429: dpkg: trigger cycle postgresql-common -> sgml-base while upgrading from stretch to buster

Hi! On Fri, 2019-05-17 at 21:12:28 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2019-05-14 02:35, Guillem Jover wrote: > > setup some chroot somewhere to do that. > > > > I'm attaching the patch. Otherwise already built (and signed) binary > > packages can be temporarily found at: > > > >

Bug#929588: usat: source tarballs are missing the source of the configure script

Hi, please use 'Reply All' next time so your answer will also get into the bug tracking system. Thanks! Am 31.05.19 um 17:50 schrieb badd...@gmail.com: > Ah I see. > > Well, I am about to put out a new release with a lot of updates. In > fact, the current release has some debian issues that I am

Processed: found 920339 in 0.99.2-5~bpo9+1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 920339 0.99.2-5~bpo9+1 Bug #920339 [matrix-synapse] matrix-synapse: installation process hangs with unknown reason Marked as found in versions matrix-synapse/0.99.2-5~bpo9+1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#907135: [Box Backup] Debian now requires 2048bit RSA keys

On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 5:03 PM Chris Wilson wrote: > Hi Reinhard, > > Presumably the many other affected packages have had similar difficulty in > developing a comprehensive solution? I also wasn't aware of a time > constraint. Not that it would have helped me much, as I was moving house, > but

Bug#907135: [Box Backup] Debian now requires 2048bit RSA keys

Hi Reinhard, Presumably the many other affected packages have had similar difficulty in developing a comprehensive solution? I also wasn't aware of a time constraint. Not that it would have helped me much, as I was moving house, but it would have been good to know that there was a risk of not maki

Bug#929172: Same issue as already reported, and partially fixed

On vrijdag 31 mei 2019 21:52:38 CEST Paul Gevers wrote: > On 31-05-2019 21:16, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > Control: severity -1 serious > > Please don't use this if you CC multiple bugs that aren't all of the > same severity. Sorry about that, didn't realize that it would affect CC-ed bugs too. L

Bug#929819: closing 929819

close 929819 67.0-1 thanks

Processed: closing 929819

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 929819 67.0-1 Bug #929819 [firefox] [firefox] package v67 Marked as fixed in versions firefox/67.0-1. Bug #929819 [firefox] [firefox] package v67 Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance

Bug#929819: [firefox] package v67

Package: firefox Version: 66.0.5-1 Severity: critical Firefox v67 was released 10 days ago and includes critical security fixes (as I'm sure I don't need to point out, they always do). Please update the package on the unstable channel. I am aware that we are currently in a freeze period for the n

Processed (with 1 error): Re: Same issue as already reported, and partially fixed

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 55 grave Bug #55 {Done: Bastian Blank } [libdebian-installer] libdebian-installer: Unable to parse Packages files with long lines Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 55 to the same value. > merge 929172 904699 Bug #929

Bug#554444: Same issue as already reported, and partially fixed

severity 55 grave merge 929172 904699 thanks Hi Diederik, On 31-05-2019 21:16, Diederik de Haas wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious Please don't use this if you CC multiple bugs that aren't all of the same severity. > The fix has actually been made. But the problem is that it needs an unb

Processed: Repairing inadvertent severity changes

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 55 grave Bug #55 {Done: Bastian Blank } [libdebian-installer] libdebian-installer: Unable to parse Packages files with long lines Severity set to 'grave' from 'serious' > severity 904699 important Bug #904699 {Done: Asbjørn Sloth

Processed: Same issue as already reported, and partially fixed

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #929172 [cdebootstrap] cdebootstrap: buster 2019-05-18 parser_rfc822: Iek! Don't find end of value! Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' -- 929172: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929172 Debian Bug Tracking System Conta

Bug#554444: Same issue as already reported, and partially fixed

Control: severity -1 serious Hi, This is the same issue as https://bugs.debian.org/904699, which is actually an issue in libdebian-installer (https://bugs.debian.org/55). The fix has actually been made. But the problem is that it needs an unblock ack from the d-i team (https://bugs.debian.

Processed: Same issue as already reported, and partially fixed

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #904699 {Done: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen } [cdebootstrap] W: parser_rfc822: Iek! Don't find end of value! when using sid or testing Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 904699: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=904699

Processed: Same issue as already reported, and partially fixed

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #55 {Done: Bastian Blank } [libdebian-installer] libdebian-installer: Unable to parse Packages files with long lines Severity set to 'serious' from 'grave' -- 55: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=55 Debian Bug T

Processed: Re: hyantesite: test failures on most architectures

Processing control commands: > retitle -1 should hyantesite be part of buster? Bug #888733 [src:hyantesite] hyantesite: test failures on most architectures Changed Bug title to 'should hyantesite be part of buster?' from 'hyantesite: test failures on most architectures'. -- 888733: https://bugs

Bug#888733: hyantesite: test failures on most architectures

Control: retitle -1 should hyantesite be part of buster? Hi, On Tue, 21 May 2019 07:24:17 +0200 Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 08:05:09PM +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > > On 19/05/2019 18:15, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > So what is the plan to fix this bug? Create new reference

Bug#929815: uglifyjs.terser does not work for any file

package: uglifyjs.terser version: 3.14.1-1 severity: grave justification: it does not work at all Sample repo https://salsa.debian.org/gi-boi-guest/node-d3-fetch Also tried in https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-d3-scale-chromatic with same error when trying to minimize dist/d3-scale-chromati

Bug#929269: marked as done (coturn: overwrites database file /var/lib/turn/turndb on upgrade or reinstall)

Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2019 15:18:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#929269: fixed in coturn 4.5.1.1-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #929269, regarding coturn: overwrites database file /var/lib/turn/turndb on upgrade or reinstall to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: fixed 880047 in 1.36-5.1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 880047 1.36-5.1 Bug #880047 {Done: Peter Palfrader } [postgrey] postgrey doesn't start because it can't write its pid Marked as fixed in versions postgrey/1.36-5.1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistanc

Bug#929588: usat: source tarballs are missing the source of the configure script

Hi, thanks for your quick answer! Am 31.05.19 um 12:26 schrieb badd...@gmail.com: > I am sending this from my other account, as your email service is blocking > my main email telling me I have been blacklisted. > > Those packages are astronomically out of date. I had problems with > Sourceforge

Bug#907135: [Box Backup] Debian now requires 2048bit RSA keys

Hi Chris, On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 12:21 PM Chris Wilson wrote: > Hi Reinhard and all, > > Good news, I have just finished fixing this problem, and merged it into > master with https://github.com/boxbackup/boxbackup/pull/36. Please could > you cut a new Debian package release and see if the tests

Bug#907135: marked as done (boxbackup FTBFS with OpenSSL 1.1.1)

Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2019 11:03:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#907135: fixed in boxbackup 0.13~~git20190527.g039c4a1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #907135, regarding boxbackup FTBFS with OpenSSL 1.1.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#929788: marked as done (e-antic: test suite fails on 32 bit architectures)

Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2019 08:40:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#929788: fixed in e-antic 0.1.2+ds-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #929788, regarding e-antic: test suite fails on 32 bit architectures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#929788: e-antic: test suite fails on 32 bit architectures

Package: e-antic Version: 0.1.2+ds-2 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: fails to build from source FTBFS on 32 bit architectures. Jerome -- System Information: Debian Release: Stretch* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x

Bug#929283: zookeeper: CVE-2019-0201: information disclosure vulnerability

Hi Tony, On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 06:47:33AM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 10:07:38PM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > > On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 08:58:29PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > > Looks fine, but can you please also include the test case upstream added? > > > Given