Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 732960 iceweasel/24.2.0esr-1
Bug #732960 [iceweasel] iceweasel: includes non-DFSG-free bsdiff.c
Marked as found in versions iceweasel/24.2.0esr-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
732960: http
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 732960 iceweasel/26.0-1
Bug #732960 [iceweasel] iceweasel: includes non-DFSG-free bsdiff.c
Marked as found in versions iceweasel/26.0-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
732960: http://bugs.de
Package: iceweasel
Version: 17.0.10esr-1~deb7u1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing the licenses used in wine-gecko (basically Firefox 21
in the version I'm reviewing), I came across
other-licenses/bsdiff/bsdiff.c which uses the "BSD Prote
Hi David,
Thanks for fixing this bug in avarice. Please do go ahead with the NMU.
avarice is up for adoption. See the RFA here: http://bugs.debian.org/732433
Would you like to adopt avarice?
Cheers,
Shaun
--
http://sjackman.ca
On 2013-Dec-22 at 10:39:11 , David Prévot (taf...@debian.org) wrot
Your message dated Mon, 23 Dec 2013 04:05:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#731979: fixed in qtwebkit-opensource-src 5.1.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #731979,
regarding qtwebkit-opensource-src: FTBFS with bison 3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 732940 732952
Bug #732940 [openssh-client] Broken with newer OpenSSL: "OpenSSL version
mismatch. Built against 1000105f, you have 10001060"
Bug #732952 [openssh-client] libssl1.0.0 1.0.1e-5 breaks ssh
Added indication that 732952 affec
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 732940 732952
Bug #732940 [openssh-client] Broken with newer OpenSSL: "OpenSSL version
mismatch. Built against 1000105f, you have 10001060"
Bug #732952 [openssh-client] libssl1.0.0 1.0.1e-5 breaks ssh
Bug #732952 [openssh-client] libss
Control: reassign -1 openssh-client
Control: merge 732940 -1
Control: found -1 1:6.4p1-1
On 2013-12-23 01:31:43 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Actually, that's ssh this new libssl1.0.0 version breaks, not svn
> (svn as a consequence).
and that's the same bug as 732940.
--
Vincent Lefèvre - We
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 openssh-client
Bug #732952 [src:openssh] libssl1.0.0 1.0.1e-5 breaks ssh
Bug reassigned from package 'src:openssh' to 'openssh-client'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #732952 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fi
I cannot reproduce the armel failure in a qemu chroot. I also cannot
reproduce this failure on real armel hardware. I requested access to a
Debian porterbox to see if the failure shows up there.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 732940 732952
Bug #732940 [openssh-client] Broken with newer OpenSSL: "OpenSSL version
mismatch. Built against 1000105f, you have 10001060"
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #732952 is 'src:openssh' not 'openssh-client'
Failed t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 732940 serious
Bug #732940 [openssh-client] Broken with newer OpenSSL: "OpenSSL version
mismatch. Built against 1000105f, you have 10001060"
Severity set to 'serious' from 'grave'
> reassign 732952 src:openssh
Bug #732952 [libssl1.0.0] l
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 01:23:13AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> ssh fails with same message too,
> it looks like openssl was built against a wrong version of libssl.
No, openssl just returns a new version number. Nobody should be
checking that and return an error if it changed.
Kurt
--
To UNSU
Control: retitle -1 libssl1.0.0 1.0.1e-5 breaks ssh
On 2013-12-23 01:13:37 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> (not sure about the right thing to do, the point is that this new version
> breaks svn)
Actually, that's ssh this new libssl1.0.0 version breaks, not svn
(svn as a consequence).
--
Vincent
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 libssl1.0.0 1.0.1e-5 breaks ssh
Bug #732952 [libssl1.0.0] libssl1.0.0 1.0.1e-5 breaks svn
Changed Bug title to 'libssl1.0.0 1.0.1e-5 breaks ssh' from 'libssl1.0.0
1.0.1e-5 breaks svn'
--
732952: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732952
De
reassign 732952 subversion
thanks
> $ svn log
> OpenSSL version mismatch. Built against 1000105f, you have 10001060
It should not be doing any version checks.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...
ssh fails with same message too,
it looks like openssl was built against a wrong version of libssl.
Jérémy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Severity 729649 important
Thanks
cegui-m2k b-d's on non-available liblua5.1-expat-dev
which isn't built anymoreby lua-expat.
It's no longer built as a binary package in it's own right
but it does still seem to exist as a virtual package.
Afacit build-depening on virtual packages with only one
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> Severity 729649 important
Bug #729649 [src:cegui-mk2] cegui-m2k b-d's on non-available liblua5.1-expat-dev
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
729649: http://
Package: libssl1.0.0
Version: 1.0.1e-5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.3
(not sure about the right thing to do, the point is that this new version
breaks svn)
After the upgrade of libssl1.0.0 to 1.0.1e-5:
$ svn log
OpenSSL version mismatch. Built against 1000105f, you have 10001060
svn:
The bug #732597 addresses sid, but it seems wheezy is suffering as well.
I'm not sure if it deserves a new bug report, does it?
$ sudo apt-get install haskell-platform
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. Th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 732940 libssl1.0.0
Bug #732940 [openssh-client] Broken with newer OpenSSL: "OpenSSL version
mismatch. Built against 1000105f, you have 10001060"
Added indication that 732940 affects libssl1.0.0
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 732940 grave
Bug #732940 [openssh-client] Broken with newer OpenSSL: "OpenSSL version
mismatch. Built against 1000105f, you have 10001060"
Severity set to 'grave' from 'critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
Package: libssl1.0.0
Version: 1.0.1e-5
Followup-For: Bug #732940
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 02:45:32PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
>>
>> It's not OK to break forward compatibility without changing SONAME.
>> Software built against an older version of a library must always work
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 732940 openssh-client
Bug #732940 [src:openssh] Breaks ssh: OpenSSL version mismatch. Built against
1000105f, you have 10001060
Bug reassigned from package 'src:openssh' to 'openssh-client'.
No longer marked as found in versions openssh/
Josh Triplett wrote:
> I upgraded OpenSSL and OpenSSH stopped working. Since the SONAME didn't
> change, kinda by definition this seems like a bug in OpenSSL, not
> OpenSSH.
That "by definition" only holds if you assume all applications are
perfect software with no bugs whatsoever, and use librar
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 732940 Broken with newer OpenSSL: "OpenSSL version mismatch. Built
> against 1000105f, you have 10001060"
Bug #732940 [openssh-client] Breaks ssh: OpenSSL version mismatch. Built
against 1000105f, you have 10001060
Changed Bug title to '
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 732940 src:openssh 1:6.4p1-1
Bug #732940 [libssl1.0.0] Breaks ssh: OpenSSL version mismatch. Built against
1000105f, you have 10001060
Bug reassigned from package 'libssl1.0.0' to 'src:openssh'.
No longer marked as found in versions open
On 2013-12-22 23:08 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 14:02:37 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
>> Package: libssl1.0.0
>> Version: 1.0.1e-5
>> Severity: critical
>>
>> Upgrading OpenSSL caused SSH to break.
>>
>> Here's the upgrade from aptitude's log:
>> [UPGRADE] libssl-dev:
On 21/12/2013 22:31, Markus Koschany wrote:
> On 20.12.2013 13:29, Robert Millan wrote:
> [...]
>> If you've got spare time to do some tests, it would help to know which
>> version
>> of the kfreebsd-11 package introduced this bug.
>
> I downloaded the first and second kernel image for kfreebsd-1
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 02:45:32PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> It's not OK to break forward compatibility without changing SONAME.
> Software built against an older version of a library must always work
> with a newer version that has the same SONAME; that's what the SONAME
> exists for. It'd
Hi,
I can also confirm that Markus' patch works.
Thanks,
Roland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 07:14:00PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:25:16AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > But I'm also thinking about at least #732710
> >
> > There are also things like:
> > Author: Dr. Stephen Henson
> > Date: Mon Sep 16 05:23:44 2013 +0100
> >
> > D
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 724731
Bug #724731 {Done: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort } [gdm3] [gdm3] gdm
does not start properly, cannot login via gdm
Unarchived Bug 724731
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
724731: http://bu
Package: libssl1.0.0
Version: 1.0.1e-5
Followup-For: Bug #732940
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 02:16:43PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> Package: libssl1.0.0
>> Version: 1.0.1e-5
>> Followup-For: Bug #732940
>>
>> Julien Cristau wrote:
>> > On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 14:02:37 -0800, Jo
Package: python-csb
Version: 1.2.1+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid, jessie
the python-csb autopkg test always fails, trying to write test data into the
installed location.
adt-run: & dsc0t-build: [
-> Finished parsing the build-deps
Traceback (most rece
fixed upstream, see revision 772
--
Markus Hoenicka
http://www.mhoenicka.de
AQ score 38
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:23:52PM -0700, Khalid Aziz wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-11-30 at 16:28 +0100, David Suárez wrote:
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> > amd64.
> >
> > Relevant part (hopefully):
> > > gcc -m32 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I./include -I./u
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 02:16:43PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Package: libssl1.0.0
> Version: 1.0.1e-5
> Followup-For: Bug #732940
>
> Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 14:02:37 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >> Package: libssl1.0.0
> >> Version: 1.0.1e-5
> >> Severity: critical
Package: libssl1.0.0
Version: 1.0.1e-5
Followup-For: Bug #732940
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 14:02:37 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> Package: libssl1.0.0
>> Version: 1.0.1e-5
>> Severity: critical
>>
>> Upgrading OpenSSL caused SSH to break.
>>
>> Here's the upgrade from apti
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 14:02:37 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Package: libssl1.0.0
> Version: 1.0.1e-5
> Severity: critical
>
> Upgrading OpenSSL caused SSH to break.
>
> Here's the upgrade from aptitude's log:
> [UPGRADE] libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.1e-4 -> 1.0.1e-5
> [UPGRADE] libssl1.0.0:amd64 1.0.
Package: libssl1.0.0
Version: 1.0.1e-5
Severity: critical
Upgrading OpenSSL caused SSH to break.
Here's the upgrade from aptitude's log:
[UPGRADE] libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.1e-4 -> 1.0.1e-5
[UPGRADE] libssl1.0.0:amd64 1.0.1e-4 -> 1.0.1e-5
[UPGRADE] openssl:amd64 1.0.1e-4 -> 1.0.1e-5
And here's SSH fa
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.11.10-1
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Dear Maintainer,
As mentioned here
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-hardware-18/hard-drive-corruption-with-asm1062-sata-controller-4175469744/
by somebody else using the ASMedia in AHCI
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 732854 normal
Bug #732854 [xserver-xorg-video-nouveau] lightdm shows a part of my desktop
screen as a part of the background of the login screen
Bug #700235 [xserver-xorg-video-nouveau] xserver-xorg-video-nouveau:
uninitialized video me
Your message dated Sun, 22 Dec 2013 21:21:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#732418: fixed in imagemagick 8:6.7.7.10-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #732418,
regarding does not build with recent freetype
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sun, 22 Dec 2013 21:22:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#692625: fixed in jenkins-json 2.4-jenkins-3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #692625,
regarding non-free files in upstream tarball ("The Software shall be used for
Good, not Evil")
to be marked as done.
Thi
Processing control commands:
> found -1 1:1.0.10-1
Bug #732854 [xserver-xorg-video-nouveau] lightdm shows a part of my desktop
screen as a part of the background of the login screen
Bug #700235 [xserver-xorg-video-nouveau] xserver-xorg-video-nouveau:
uninitialized video memory or garbled images
Your message dated Sun, 22 Dec 2013 19:49:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#732754: fixed in openssl 1.0.1e-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #732754,
regarding openssl: CVE-2013-6449: crash when using TLS 1.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +pending
Bug #731979 [src:qtwebkit-opensource-src] qtwebkit-opensource-src: FTBFS on
armhf
Added tag(s) pending.
> retitle -1 qtwebkit-opensource-src: FTBFS with bison 3
Bug #731979 [src:qtwebkit-opensource-src] qtwebkit-opensource-src: FTBFS on
armhf
Chang
Control: tags -1 +pending
Control: retitle -1 qtwebkit-opensource-src: FTBFS with bison 3
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 20:42:52 +0400, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> The patch attached at https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119798 should
> fix this.
I have applied an adapted version of that patch in our pac
Your message dated Sun, 22 Dec 2013 19:18:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#730910: fixed in ipxe 1.0.0+git-2013.c3d1e78-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #730910,
regarding ipxe: FTBFS: b-d on libiberty-dev instead of binutils-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On Sunday 22 December 2013 16:24:28 Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 00:57:06 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > As explained before
tags 730910 + patch
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ipxe (versioned as 1.0.0+git-2013.c3d1e78-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
David
diff -Nru ipxe-1.0.0+git-2013.c3d1e78/debian/changelog ipxe-1.0.0+git
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 730910 + patch
Bug #730910 [src:ipxe] ipxe: FTBFS: b-d on libiberty-dev instead of binutils-dev
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
730910: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre
tags 730902 + patch
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for avarice (versioned as 2.11-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
David
diff -u avarice-2.11/debian/changelog avarice-2.11/debian/changelog
--- avarice-2.11/debian/
Hi Sébastien,
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Sébastien Villemot
wrote:
> I uploaded to DELAYED/2 a NMU of blacs-mpi versioned 1.1-31.1 and fixing
> that issue. The debdiff is attached. Don't hesitate to tell me if I
> should delay the upload longer.
It is fine for me. Thank you for your help.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 730902 + patch
Bug #730902 [src:avarice] avarice: FTBFS: b-d on libiberty-dev instead of
binutils-dev
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
730902: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #ipxe (1.0.0+git-2013.c3d1e78-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> #
> # * Build-depend on libiberty-dev. (closes: #730910)
> #
> limit source ipxe
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'ipxe'
Limit currently set to 'sour
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #avarice (2.11-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> #
> # * Build-depend on libiberty-dev. Closes: #730902.
> #
> limit source avarice
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'avarice'
Limit currently set to 'source':'avarice'
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 726742 699647
Bug #726742 [proftpd-mod-geoip] proftpd-mod-geoip: postrm deletes mod_geoip.so
on upgrades
Bug #699647 [proftpd-mod-geoip] proftpd-mod-geoip:
/usr/lib/proftpd/mod_geoip.so missing after upgrade from sid
Marked as found in ver
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:50 AM, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2013-12-17 Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Source: libvigraimpex
>> Version: 1.9.0+dfsg-7
> [...]
>> libvigraimpex FTBFS on a mipsel buildd:
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libvigraimpex&arch=mipsel&ver=1.9.0%2Bdfsg-7%2Bb1&st
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:25:16AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> But I'm also thinking about at least #732710
>
> There are also things like:
> Author: Dr. Stephen Henson
> Date: Mon Sep 16 05:23:44 2013 +0100
>
> Disable Dual EC DRBG.
>
> Return an error if an attempt is made to enable
Package: python-pexpect-doc
Version: 3.0-2
Severity: serious
python-pexpect-doc provides /usr/share/doc-base/pexpect, as the pre-3
python-pexpect did, but doesn't have any Replaces.
# LANG=C apt-get install python-pexpect-doc
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
control: reassign -1 xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
control: forcemerge 700235 -1
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 04:54:12PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Package: lightdm
> > Version: 1.8.
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
Bug #732854 [lightdm] lightdm shows a part of my desktop screen as a part of
the background of the login screen
Bug reassigned from package 'lightdm' to 'xserver-xorg-video-nouveau'.
No longer marked as found in versions lightd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 04:54:12PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Package: lightdm
> Version: 1.8.5-2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> Here's what I did:
> 1. Quit me desktop session.
> 2. In lightdm (whose
Your message dated Sun, 22 Dec 2013 19:31:56 +0200
with message-id <20131222173156.gc12...@rep.kiev.ua>
and subject line fixed in openbox 3.5.2-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #732861,
regarding Openbox should not depend on GNOME or KDE.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Thank you for the fix. However, just a question: when will be the fix
available in testing (Jessie) distro?
Regards,
Boross Peter
2013-12-18 20:21 keltezéssel, Debian Bug Tracking System írta:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the oolite packa
Package: src:openbox
Version: 3.5.2-5
Severity: serious
The Openbox package now has recommended GNOME and KDE packages.
This behavior violates Debian Policy 7.2:
Recommends
This declares a strong, but not absolute, dependenc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 732770 + pending
Bug #732770 [libreoffice-core] add (back) dependency on librdf0 (>= 1.0.16)
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
732770: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> Tags 713126 +patch
Bug #713126 [src:gcj-4.6] gcj-4.6: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency:
automake (< 1:1.12) but 1:1.13.3-1 is to be installed
Added tag(s) patch.
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
-
On Dec 22, 2013 12:33 AM, "David Prévot" wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for ltrace (versioned as 0.5.3-2.2) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/5.
Thank you very much for your work.
I expect to have some more time these days, and I will try fix many pending
issues in ltrace.
> Please feel free to tell
The patch attached at https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119798 should
fix this.
Also, it looks like i386 and amd64 are also affected, and we got it only
on armhf because the build started two days later, and bison 3.x was
uploaded at that time.
--
Dmitry Shachnev
signature.asc
Description:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 732770 libreoffice-core
Bug #732770 [libreoffice] add (back) dependency on librdf0 (>= 1.0.16)
Bug reassigned from package 'libreoffice' to 'libreoffice-core'.
No longer marked as found in versions libreoffice/1:4.1.3-1.
Ignoring request
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 732770 1:4.1.3-1
Bug #732770 [libreoffice] add (back) dependency on librdf0 (>= 1.0.16)
Marked as found in versions libreoffice/1:4.1.3-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
732770: http://bugs.
Your message dated Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:34:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#725600: fixed in ruby-albino 1.3.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #725600,
regarding ruby-albino: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.0" failed:
/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:51:in `require
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 05:18:31PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> No idea (yet) why 1:4.1.3+b1 (and 1:4.1.4) lost the dependency
> completely...
Ah, I see why. More multiarch breakage (since librdf0 1.0.16-2 which
introduced multiarch stuff) which breaks a (once?) needed hack
we need...
Will
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 732770 serious
Bug #732770 [libreoffice] Tighten versioned dependency on librdf0
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> retitle 732770 add (back) dependency on librdf0 (>= 1.0.16)
Bug #732770 [libreoffice] Tighten versioned dependency
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 730932 + patch
Bug #730932 [src:aufs-tools] aufs-tools: FTBFS: c2tmac.c:33:7: error:
'AUFS_XINO_TRUNC_INIT' undeclared (first use in this function)
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
tags 730932 + patch
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for aufs-tools (versioned as 1:3.2+20130722-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
David
diff -Nru aufs-tools-3.2+20130722/debian/changelog aufs-tools-3.2+20130722/debi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #aufs-tools (1:3.2+20130722-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
> #
> # * Cherry pick 0003-xino.patch from upstream: refine the xino truncation
> #(Closes: #730932)
> #
> limit source aufs-tools
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at
Your message dated Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:18:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#711395: fixed in geary 0.4.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #711395,
regarding geary: Build-depends on vala 0.18 which has been removed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:20:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#731697: fixed in nqp 2013.12.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #731697,
regarding nqp: FTBFS (test failure)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:20:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#732527: fixed in libmbim 1.6.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #732527,
regarding GFDL not mentioned in debian/copyright
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Source: radare2
Version: 0.9.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Hi,
your package fails to build from source on ia64, powerpc, s390x and
sparc:
> p/debug_native.c: In function 'r_debug_native_reg_read':
> p/debug_native.c:1530:3: error: unknown type name 'R_DEBUG_REG_T
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #684604 [eclipse-rcp] eclipse-rcp: eclipse 3.8 hangs on splash screen with
"Loading Workbench" after update from 3.7.2
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
--
684604: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684604
Debian Bug
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
I can use Eclipse 3.8.1-4 just fine here on my computer and I don't
really see the necessity for severity "grave" at the moment. Since the
package is not unusable, I'm in favor of downgrading the severity to
"important".
Regards,
Markus
signature.asc
Descri
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 02:34:36PM +0200, grigore calugar wrote:
> Adding a #include and a #include to
> tvtime-configure.c doesn't fixes the problem.
It does fix the problem to tvtime-configure. That said there are other
binaries affected using exactly the same code, namely tvtime-scanner.c,
tv
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 717923 with 732709
Bug #717923 [release.debian.org] transition: tiff 4.x (libtiff5)
717923 was blocked by: 726410 732010 732023 661409 732143 732406 732407 731657
732405
717923 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 717923: 732
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 22:40:04 +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> I have a patch for this, will submit it to the maintainers soon, if
> it's not already fixed in their git.
>
Hi Peter,
I can't see the patch at
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-pdns/pdns.git;a=summary
Any chance you could se
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> you gave very little information in your bugreport, does midori crash on
> wheezy/kfreebsd-amd64 too or does this only happen on jessie/sid?
I have not tested wheezy or jessie; only sid at this point. I'll see
if I can find s
Package: gimp-plugin-registry
Version: 5.20120621
Severity: serious
File: gimp-plugin-registry
Dear Maintainer,
This package is uninstalable because libglew1.7 has been removed from
unstable.
$ LANG=C sudo apt-get install gimp-plugin-registry
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tre
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 730316 pending
Bug #730316 [php-mail] php-mail: FTBFS: test failures in smtp_error test
Added tag(s) pending.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
730316: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi
Your message dated Sun, 22 Dec 2013 13:51:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#71: fixed in ocl-icd 2.1.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #71,
regarding ocl-icd: FTBFS: /usr/share/automake-1.13/am/ltlibrary.am: warning:
'libOpenCL.la': linking libtool libraries using a non-POS
Your message dated Sun, 22 Dec 2013 13:48:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#725938: fixed in libtar 1.2.11-6+deb6u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #725938,
regarding libtar: CVE-2013-4397: Integer overflow
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Control: tags -1 + patch pending
Dear Maintainer,
Le mardi 03 décembre 2013 à 11:52 +0100, Michael Banck a écrit :
> Package: blacs-mpi
> Version: 1.1-31
> Severity: serious
> if I try to rebuild the current unstable blacs-mpi version in sid chroot
> on s390x (zelenka.debian.org), I get the foll
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch pending
Bug #731225 [blacs-mpi] blacs-mpi: FTBFS on mpich archs: Linking fails
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
--
731225: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731225
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Your message dated Sun, 22 Dec 2013 13:18:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#731794: fixed in libanyevent-perl 7.070-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #731794,
regarding FBFTS: AnyEvent fails t/81_hosts.t on system with OpenDNS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 22 Dec 2013 12:48:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#714984: fixed in vips 7.28.5-1+deb7u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #714984,
regarding vips tiffsave leads to Segmentation fault
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Sun, 22 Dec 2013 12:48:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#731948: fixed in vips 7.28.5-1+deb7u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #731948,
regarding libvips-tools: Segmentation Fault: vips 7.28.5-1 with jpeg compression
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
