On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 20:04:14 +
Ian Campbell wrote:
> Hanno, I'm afraid don't know what is causing your boot failures but I
> don't think it is related to the new qcontrol package :-(
No, it's not related to qcontrol:
> A few things I tried while diagnosing this today:
>
> netconsole, add th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 684722 + patch
Bug #684722 [w3af] w3af: Does not start : " pybloomfiltermmap is a required
dependency"
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
684722: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
Package: w3af
Version: 1.1svn5547-1
Followup-For: Bug #684722
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu raring ubuntu-patch
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch is ready to be applied to achieve the following:
* Rediff existing dependency patch into new
remove_p
Gah. I went out of town for Saturday and Sunday. I meant to upload before I
left today but forgot. I just tried to now but I can't seem to reach my main
Debian machine. So I won't be able to upload before Sunday night Eastern USA
time. So if anyone wants to build it from the diff and upload feel
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 689332 + pending
Bug #689332 [bind9] bind9: postinst uses shipped file
/usr/share/bind9/bind9-default.md5sum as statefile
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
689332: http://
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 04:20:42PM -0500, Samuel Bronson wrote:
> 2) your package bzrlib.plugins.gtk.branchview causes gi.repository.Gtk
> to be imported
Which loads libgtk-3.so.0
> 3) python-gtk2's package gtk imports _gtk
Which loads libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
> 4) importing both of those modu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 697402 + python2.7
Bug #697402 [bzr-gtk] bzr-gtk: causes crash in pydoc -k when python-gtk2 is
also installed
Added indication that 697402 affects python2.7
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Hi Salvatore,
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 11:42:04PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> See Dev-Ref 5.11.1.[1], the 4th and 5th item. I know Michal is quite
> active so I first wanted to confirm with him. And I first at least
> like to express that I intend to NMU before uploading to a delayed
> que
Your message dated Sun, 06 Jan 2013 00:48:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#696532: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.25+dfsg1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #696532,
regarding isdnlog: /etc/isdn/isdnlog.isdnctrl0 is easily destroyed in squeeze
to wheezy upgrade
to be marked as done.
This m
Followup-For: Bug #593607
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libfm (versioned as 0.1.17-2.1) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/10, hoping to
- ask a freeze exception for it, then
- retitle the bug to "source not erased when moving across filesystems" and
- lower its severity to "normal".
Please
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 696507 + pending
Bug #696507 [src:festival] festival: FTBFS: does not define DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
696507: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
tags 696507 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
Ivo De Decker has prepared a patch and I've uploaded an NMU for
festival (versioned as 1:2.1~release-5.1) to DELAYED/2. Please feel
free to tell me if I should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jan 2013 23:48:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#696532: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.25+dfsg1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #696532,
regarding isdnlog: /etc/isdn/isdnlog.isdnctrl0 is easily destroyed in squeeze
to wheezy upgrade
to be marked as done.
This m
On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 23:23:17 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> >> Hm, not sure what "unreleased" here means;
> >I had to search for this myself. Apparently 'unreleased' is the codename for
> >the suite on debian-ports.org that has uploads that aren't in the main debian
> >archive. See http://www.deb
Ivo De Decker dixit:
>> > This indeed fixes the build failure; I uploaded to unreleased
>> > for the time being.
>>
>> Hm, not sure what "unreleased" here means;
>
>I had to search for this myself. Apparently 'unreleased' is the codename for
>the suite on debian-ports.org that has uploads that ar
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 697375 4.10.0-5
Bug #697375 {Done: Salvatore Bonaccorso } [rpm] rpm:
CVE-2012-6088
Marked as found in versions rpm/4.10.0-5.
> found 697375 4.10.1-2
Bug #697375 {Done: Salvatore Bonaccorso } [rpm] rpm:
CVE-2012-6088
Marked as found in vers
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jan 2013 23:17:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#697375: fixed in rpm 4.10.1-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #697375,
regarding rpm: CVE-2012-6088
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Hi Gregor,
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 11:51:38PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:46:58 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> > >Ivo De Decker dixit:
> > >>Here is a patch that fixes the build:
> > >Wow, thanks for your quick reaction!
> > This indeed fixes the build failure; I upl
On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:46:58 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> >Ivo De Decker dixit:
> >>Here is a patch that fixes the build:
> >Wow, thanks for your quick reaction!
> This indeed fixes the build failure; I uploaded to unreleased
> for the time being.
Hm, not sure what "unreleased" here means; but
Hi Adrian
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 09:13:21PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Salvatore,
>
> > I have seen you are in the LowNMU and the package maintained in
> > collab-maint. I can do a NMU in case you have not the time to prepare
> > the upload.
>
> Why not do an NMU and upload it
Hi Michal
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 09:06:49PM +0100, Michal Čihař wrote:
> Hi
>
> Dne Sat, 5 Jan 2013 13:33:41 +0100
> Salvatore Bonaccorso napsal(a):
>
> > Hi Michal
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 03:55:13PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > Package: rpm
> > > Severity: grave
> > > Tags:
On 2012-12-18 00:08, Roger Leigh wrote:
A fixed version of sysvinit has now been uploaded. Note that it's
much simpler than the above patch. All you need to do is add an
entry for /dev/shm in /etc/fstab as documented in fstab(5), i.e.
tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs nosuid,nodev,size=40%,mode=17
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 693263 0.4.2+svn-r40-2
Bug #693263 [qcontrol] Please add support for disabling the PIC watchdog on
TS-219p II
Marked as fixed in versions qcontrol/0.4.2+svn-r40-2.
Bug #693263 [qcontrol] Please add support for disabling the PIC watchdog on
Hi
Dne Sat, 5 Jan 2013 13:33:41 +0100
Salvatore Bonaccorso napsal(a):
> Hi Michal
>
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 03:55:13PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Package: rpm
> > Severity: grave
> > Tags: security
> > Justification: user security hole
> >
> > This was assigned CVE-2012-6088:
> > h
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 693263
Bug #693263 {Done: Ian Campbell } [qcontrol] Please add
support for disabling the PIC watchdog on TS-219p II
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may ne
Hi Nicolas,
> I consider his proposal as the best solution for wheezy.
> May I NMU to unstable?
Since no one has replied to your suggestion yet, I would suggest that
you make an NMU and upload it into DELAYED/10 which will give the
maintainers enough time for review.
This bug is a serious issue
Hi Salvatore,
> I have seen you are in the LowNMU and the package maintained in
> collab-maint. I can do a NMU in case you have not the time to prepare
> the upload.
Why not do an NMU and upload it into DELAYED/5 or /10? This time
Michal will have enough time to respond, yet we won't let too much
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 10:17 +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> The device booted fine but I saw the following error:
> | Error opening /dev/input/by-path/platform-gpio-keys-event: No such file or
> directory
> which makes me wonder whether qcontrol was really executed properly.
I finally found an o
Hi,
there has also been an upstream bug report filed [1].
Might be reasonable to check back there from time to time. No patch
yet, unfortunately.
Cheers,
Adrian
> [1] http://sourceforge.net/p/openslp/bugs/122/
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.or
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 697221 + pending
Bug #697221 [motion] motion: No longer has support for mysql
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
697221: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697
tags 697221 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for motion (versioned as 3.2.12-3.3) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru motion-3.2.12/debian/changelog motion-3.2.12/debian/changelog
--- motion-3.2.12/debian
Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.22-12
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.2
Installation fails like this:
Setting up apache2.2-common (2.2.22-12) ...
sh: 1: .: Can't open /etc/apache2/envvars
Could not read /etc/apache2/envvars
dpkg: error processing apache2.2-common (--configure):
Hi, I have i386 system and perl with amd64 kernel, may be this confused
you?
With amd64 system and perl I cannot reproduce it too.
В Сб., 05/01/2013 в 16:44 +, Dominic Hargreaves пишет:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 05:00:24PM +0400, Alexander Kudrevatykh wrote:
> > perl still segfaults with comm
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # while this is a security issue, its certainly not critical on its own
> severity 697464 important
Bug #697464 [mount] mount/umount leak information about existence of folders
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
> thanks
Stopping processi
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 05:00:24PM +0400, Alexander Kudrevatykh wrote:
> perl still segfaults with command # perl -e 'print "x"x(2**31)'
> but not segfaults with original command
I can reproduce this on i386, but not amd64.
$ perl -le 'print "v"x(2**31+1) ."=1"'
panic: memory wrap at -e line 1.
Package: mount
Version: 2.20.1-5.3
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
mount discloses information about folders not accessible for a user:
$ ls -ld /root/.ssh
ls: cannot access /root/.ssh: Permission denied
$ ls -ld /root/.foo
ls: cannot access /root/.foo: Permiss
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 683584 ganglia: [Debian RT] CVE-2012-3448: arbitrary script execution
Bug #683584 {Done: Daniel Pocock } [ganglia] ganglia:
[Debian RT] CVE-2012-3348: arbitrary script execution
Changed Bug title to 'ganglia: [Debian RT] CVE-2012-3448: ar
Hi Daniel
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 05:49:00PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Upstream have released 3.1.8 which only differs from 3.1.7 by adding the
> fix for the security issue
>
> It has now been pushed to the git.debian.org VCS for building the
> Ganglia package
>
> It is on the squeeze branch
While I'm not 100% clear on how dovecot handles permissions, would the
fix not be to set mail_access_groups=mail?
Per http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Errors/ChgrpNoPerm
Otherwise your default mail_location can not work unless it writes the
files as root or something. This doesnt seem to be the case ju
Hi,
* Eric Dorland [2013-01-05 14:02]:
> * Thijs Kinkhorst (th...@debian.org) wrote:
> > On Fri, January 4, 2013 11:39, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > > On Thu, January 3, 2013 04:19, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> > >> This is a follow up for #697108 and CVE-2012-6085.
> > >
> > > Eric,
> > >
> >
Hi Eric,
On Sat, January 5, 2013 08:30, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Thijs Kinkhorst (th...@debian.org) wrote:
>> On Fri, January 4, 2013 11:39, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> > On Thu, January 3, 2013 04:19, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
>> >> This is a follow up for #697108 and CVE-2012-6085.
>> >
>> >
Hi Michal
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 03:55:13PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: rpm
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> This was assigned CVE-2012-6088:
> http://rpm.org/gitweb?p=rpm.git;a=commitdiff;h=3d74c43e7424bc8bf95f5e031446ecb6b08381e8
I hav
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 695770 2.6.8-1
Bug #695770 [src:python2.6] python2.6 2.6.8-1: FTBFS on i386 mips sparc
Marked as found in versions python2.6/2.6.8-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
695770: http://bugs.debia
On Sat, 2013-01-05 at 11:44 +0200, Oren Held wrote:
> Daniel,
n@bugs won't reach the submitter by default (unless they've manually
subscribed to the bug); you need to CC them.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Control: severity -1 normal
Andreas Weber writes:
> apt-get build-dep atlas
> doesn't install devscripts and therefore "fakeroot debian/rules custom"
> because of missing dch.
Which isn't used in regular builds so doesn't have to be in
Build-Depends. The documentation for the custom target shou
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #697431 [atlas] src atlas: missing build-dep "devscripts"
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
697431: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697431
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
T
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jan 2013 10:02:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#688435: fixed in dotlrn 2.5.0+dfsg-6+wheezy4
has caused the Debian Bug report #688435,
regarding dotlrn: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/dotlrn/config.tcl
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jan 2013 10:03:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#664144: fixed in tthsum 1.3.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #664144,
regarding tthsum: FTBFS[kfreebsd-amd64]: big endian test fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Package: atlas
Version: 3.8.4-9
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the
past)
Dear Maintainer,
src:atlas uses dch to build which is available in package devscripts but
it's no dependency.
apt-get build-dep atlas
doesn't install devscripts and th
Daniel,
I too, use GNOME's fallback mode (aka 'gnome classic') with an old video card,
and fail to reproduce it. (I think the 'unreproducible' tag means that we don't
yet know how to reproduce the problem on *other* environments, therefore the
tag is justified)
Can you please kill nm-applet an
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 11:06:27 -0600, Micah Gersten wrote:
> Package: josm-plugins
> Version: 0.0.svn29007+ds1-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
>
> The josm dependency was bumped to 5608, but 5576 is the latest version in
> unsta
Hi
Only a small follow-up. David (Maintainer of sanlock) will have a look
at this in the upcoming week.
Regards,
Salvatore
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Salut Mathieu,
On 02/01/2013 16:11, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:> Package: clang
> Version: 3.2-1~exp1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> After following the explanation from the excellent blog:
>
>
http://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/sylvestre/2012/08/15/libc_new_c_standar
53 matches
Mail list logo
