Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 649841 important
Bug #649841 {Done: Kurt Roeckx } [openssl] openssl: FTBFS on
sparc (Hardware capability "mul32" not enabled for "smul")
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
severity 649841 important
thanks
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 01:55:38AM +0100, David Miller wrote:
>
> This was fixed incorrectly, and causes regressions. The sparcv9
> optimized assembler routines are no longer enabled, amongst other
> things. The change should be flat out reverted.
>
> The error
Package: wine64-bin
Version: 1.4.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package does not ship a
copyright file.
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian
On August 31, 2012 06:47:07 PM Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> The i386 build of insighttoolkit4 ran into test suite errors:
>
> The following tests FAILED:
> 619 - itkFFTWF_FFTTest (SEGFAULT)
> 620 - itkFFTWF_RealFFTTest (SEGFAULT)
> 621 - itkVnlFFTWF_FFTTest (SEGFAULT)
> 622 -
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 640499
Bug #685054 [nvidia-glx] Break wine opengl support on amd64
685054 was not blocked by any bugs.
685054 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 685054: 640499
> affects 640499 + libgl1-nvidia-glx
Bug #640499 [libxvmc] libxvmc: please add
Processing control commands:
> tags 680235 + unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #680235 [debirf] debirf: wheezy minimal image segfaults during boot
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
--
680235: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680235
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.
Control: tags 680235 + unreproducible moreinfo
Hi Lucas--
On 07/04/2012 10:40 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I generate a wheezy 'minimal' image using debirf (running it as root,
> since running it as normal user fails).
>
> After generation, I try to boot it using:
> kvm -m 512 -kernel vmlinuz-3.2
Processing control commands:
> found -1 nvidia-graphics-drivers/302.17-1
Bug #686033 [libgl1-nvidia-glx] libgl1-nvidia-glx: 304.37-1
libgl1-nvidia-glx:i386 removes libgl1-nvidia-glx (amd64) and Nvidia driver
Marked as found in versions nvidia-graphics-drivers/302.17-1.
> block -1 by 640499
Bug #6
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Ulrich Dangel wrote:
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for alpine (versioned as 2.02+dfsg-1.1). The diff
is attached to this message.
Hi Ulrich, and Jonathan,
Thank you for improving this package, and sorry I didn't do this yet! I
will be working on requesting a fre
This was fixed incorrectly, and causes regressions. The sparcv9
optimized assembler routines are no longer enabled, amongst other
things. The change should be flat out reverted.
The error message originally reported in the build was due to a
bug in Sparc binutils, it wasn't turning on multiply
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 649841
Bug #649841 {Done: Kurt Roeckx } [openssl] openssl: FTBFS on
sparc (Hardware capability "mul32" not enabled for "smul")
Unarchived Bug 649841
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
64984
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 minor
Bug #686626 [aptitude] aptitude: Should not arch-qualfy arch-less packages on
dpkg calls
Severity set to 'minor' from 'serious'
--
686626: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686626
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debia
Control: severity -1 minor
On 9 September 2012 04:13, Francesco Poli wrote:
> The rationale behind my question is instead the following doubt: what
> if I pin aptitude to version 0.6.8-1? Is it useful to avoid being hit
> by this bug or is it totally useless?
Technically yes, this was introduced
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 671768 patch
Bug #671768 [software-center] software-center: fails to display list of
software if "gir1.2-gstreamer-0.10" is not installed
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
6
tags 671768 patch
thanks
Debdiff fixing this issue attached. Here's the patch added:
Description: Wrap import of GStreamer in a try/except.
The VideoPlayerGtk3 class does not actually seem to be used anywhere, so we
can safely not import GStreamer.
Author: Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
Origin: ups
* Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote [08.09.12 20:47]:
> Actually you can cancel it. After a long bout of inactivity I'm
> working on a new revision of the package and I will fold your
> changes into it.
Ok great, i just canceled it!
> If you like, you can make future changes directly
> into a branch of t
Your message dated Sat, 08 Sep 2012 23:03:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#685082: fixed in java-package 0.50+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #685082,
regarding debconf abuse
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Hello,
How are you doing, this is a awareness to let the public know that
we have a job opening for the position of Accounts Receivable/Payable
Clerk at (ANDREW ARTIST LIMITED).
Would you like to work from your home and get paid weekly? (ANDREW
ARTIST) specialize in serving the entire countr
Hi Henrique,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> - Forwarded message from Jeroen Roos -
[...]
> I am the maintainer of "Zoph", a webbased program to organize photos.
> This program has been part of Debian for a long time, but it has not
> been updated for a while.
[...]
> The current ve
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 614404 important
Bug #614404 {Done: Vagrant Cascadian } [zoneminder]
zoneminder: Arch amd64 (and probably non-32barch) bad type declaration
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
severity 614404 important
quit
Hi,
In January, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> the changes are a bit too intrusive with the new upstream versions- there are
> no specific series of patches that fixed it upstream, and the patch (for the
> version in squeeze) didn't really work well for me, although ot
On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 20:05:41 +0200 Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2012-09-08 18:33, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Does this mean that the bug was introduced by aptitude/0.6.8.1-1?
> > Or is the bug present in aptitude/0.6.8-1, as well?
> >
> > Please let me know, thanks for your time.
> >
>
> acco
Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> - dh_installxmlcatalogs passing an overly long string to autoscript().
>
> I think whatever fix is implemented (unless someone knows an answer to my
> question above), it will mean a change to dh_installxmlcatalogs. So perhaps
> this bug should be cloned against xml-co
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Ulrich Dangel wrote:
* Willi Mann wrote [17.06.12 12:34]:
Any progress on this? This should be a rather simple issue.
My recommendation is to rename the binary of dconf. Maybe the binaries
name could be changed to confdumper?
I think this would be a great proposal but fr
On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 16:28:41 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> Having said that, I must say I'm surprised that "python-support" is
> going away, as it seems to be used by ~800 packages. Is there a
> replacement? What is it?
http://wiki.debian.org/Python/PythonSupportToDHPython2
(And http://wiki.deb
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Ulrich Dangel wrote:
tags 685896 + pending
tags 631257 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for dovecot (versioned as 1:2.1.7-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Actually you can cancel it. After
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 676038 0.1.2.0-3
Bug #676038 {Done: Ralf Treinen } [src:tmexpand] tmexpand:
FTBFS: Unable to open tmmode. Check the value of the S-Lang load path.
No longer marked as found in versions tmexpand/0.1.2.0-3.
> thanks
Stopping processing he
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 685896 + pending
Bug #685896 [src:dovecot] dovecot-core: Overwrites SSL certificate without
warning
Bug #631257 [src:dovecot] package rewrites SSL certificates
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 631257 + pending
Bug #631257 [
tags 685896 + pending
tags 631257 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for dovecot (versioned as 1:2.1.7-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru dovecot-2.1.7/debian/changelog dovecot-2.1.7/debian/changelog
Hello.
Well, after a few tries I could reproduce this problem, I'm sure there
are multiple ways this problem would present itself but normally is
easier to find the problem once you have a reproducible path.
With a pbuilder version 0.212 you need to enable ccache, that implies adding:
CCACHEDIR="
Hi,
I've sponsored the NMU. Uploaded to DELAYED/3 queue.
--
Martín Ferrari
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 18:44:17 +0100, Ehud Meiri wrote:
> Here's a patch that removes the python-nautilus dependency.
I guess the long description also needs an update, it says:
It is integrated with Nautilus: you can either run postr when you are
browsing your photos or just drag them from Naut
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 644691 + patch
Bug #644691 [postr] postr: Please transition to nautilus 3 and GObject
introspection
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
644691: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 03:46:51PM +0200, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> found 684528 0.152-1+b1
> thanks
>
> Hello,
>
> Sorry, I've just tried to reproduce the bug and I got a FTBS in
> testing, but not with the unstable version.
>
> Should we ask the release team to allow the transition to testing
On 2012-09-08 18:33, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 09:27:05 +0200 Niels Thykier wrote:
>
>> # setting found version to version in testing
>> found 686626 aptitude/0.6.8.1-1
>> found 686346 apt/0.9.7.4
>> thanks
>
> May I ask for a little clarification?
>
> Does this mean that the b
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 03:00:01PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Control: tags -1 fixed 0.153-1
> Control: tags -1 - sid
> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> Mark Wielaard writes:
>
> > On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 09:07 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >> During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, you
Hi,
Here's a patch that removes the python-nautilus dependency.
- Ehudw
diff -Nru postr-0.12.4/debian/changelog postr-0.12.4/debian/changelog
--- postr-0.12.4/debian/changelog 2010-04-17 08:48:47.0 +0100
+++ postr-0.12.4/debian/changelog 2012-09-08 18:24:50.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10
Remove build depedency libopenh323-dev , package has been removed
diff -Nru yate-4.1.0-1~dfsg/debian/changelog yate-4.1.0-1~dfsg/debian/changelog
--- yate-4.1.0-1~dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-06-16 05:52:54.0 +
+++ yate-4.1.0-1~dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-09-08 17:48:24.0 +
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 631257 src:dovecot
Bug #631257 [dovecot-imapd] package rewrites SSL certificates
Bug reassigned from package 'dovecot-imapd' to 'src:dovecot'.
No longer marked as found in versions dovecot/1:2.1.7-2 and dovecot/1:2.0.13-1.
Ignoring reques
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 685585 with 687042
Bug #685585 [src:fex] src:fex: GPL + additional restrictions
685585 was not blocked by any bugs.
685585 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 685585: 687042
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Your message dated Sat, 08 Sep 2012 17:32:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#657046: fixed in alpine 2.02+dfsg-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #657046,
regarding alpine: Alpine uses DES-56 in violation of RFC 5751
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 631257 685896
Bug #631257 [dovecot-imapd] package rewrites SSL certificates
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #685896 is 'dovecot-core' not 'dovecot-imapd'
Failed to forcibly merge 631257: Did not alter merged bugs
Debbug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 645133 + confirmed
Bug #645133 [simile-timeline] simile-timeline: source package should use proper
source
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
645133: http://bugs.debian.or
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for alpine (versioned as 2.02+dfsg-1.1). The diff
is attached to this message.
Regards.
diff -Nru alpine-2.02+dfsg/debian/changelog alpine-2.02+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- alpine-2.02+dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-07-03 00:49:33.0 +0100
+++ alpine-2.02+
I'm looking into this as part of BSP in Dublin.
The problem with Niels's fix is that it requires code changes to the program
invoking autoscript, dh_installxmlcatalogs in this case.
I tried Tristan's idea - patch below - and although it works, MY PATCH
INTRODUCES A SUBTLE INCOMPATIBILITY. Here's
forwarded 593607
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3565792&group_id=156956&atid=801864
thank you
This bug was a bit hard to reproduce as it didn't happen when moving just a
bunch of files.
It also happened when no space left on destination device.
Fixed in upstream by commit f8441
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 593607
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3565792&group_id=156956&atid=801864
Bug #593607 {Done: Andrew Lee } [pcmanfm] pcmanfm wrongly
deleted some files in a failed move operation
Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 685896 patch
Bug #685896 [dovecot-core] dovecot-core: Overwrites SSL certificate without
warning
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #685896 to the same tags previously set
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 09:27:05 +0200 Niels Thykier wrote:
> # setting found version to version in testing
> found 686626 aptitude/0.6.8.1-1
> found 686346 apt/0.9.7.4
> thanks
May I ask for a little clarification?
Does this mean that the bug was introduced by aptitude/0.6.8.1-1?
Or is the bug pres
tags 685896 patch
diff -Nru dovecot-2.1.7/debian/changelog dovecot-2.1.7/debian/changelog
--- dovecot-2.1.7/debian/changelog 2012-06-22 04:32:02.0 +
+++ dovecot-2.1.7/debian/changelog 2012-09-08 15:25:12.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+dovecot (1:2.1.7-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 685896 + patch
Bug #685896 [dovecot-core] dovecot-core: Overwrites SSL certificate without
warning
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
685896: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
Your message dated Sat, 08 Sep 2012 16:02:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#685542: fixed in d-push 2.0-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #685542,
regarding d-push: Error when using https://myserver/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
bts tags 685896 + patch
diff -Nru dovecot-2.1.7/debian/changelog dovecot-2.1.7/debian/changelog
--- dovecot-2.1.7/debian/changelog 2012-06-22 04:32:02.0 +
+++ dovecot-2.1.7/debian/changelog 2012-09-08 15:04:02.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+dovecot (1:2.1.7-2.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=l
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 22:06 -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> On 08/18/2012 05:03 AM, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Just to help those scanning the RC bug lists, the binNMU request for
> > bobcat is #683244. The binNMU for c++-annotations would need to be
> > requested later.
> >
> > I've done a simple test
We fixed the errors we got, patch is attached.
Unfortunately, it appears that after it compiles it then fails in the
compilation (?) of IDL files. I don't know much about GObject or IDL,
and could not go further in the debugging. The failed build log is at:
http://pastebin.com/nLD0uZWm.
Somebody
I'm looking at this bug as part of the BSP in Dublin, and I have a few
points:
It seems that python-support does support the correct behaviour, and
it's documented how to invoke it. It is the responsibility of the user
of this package (i.e. the maintainer of a package which build-depends on
pytho
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 10:35:55PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
>
> I've prepared an NMU for llvm-defaults (versioned as 0.14+nmu1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
I made a typo in the changelog, and just fixed it in 0.14+nmu2 as asked
Your message dated Sat, 08 Sep 2012 16:16:41 +0100
with message-id <1347117401.8753.53.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#683998: closed by Holger Levsen
(confirmed again for 2.0.6-1)
has caused the Debian Bug report #683998,
regarding munin: allows creation of sockets
On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 15:46 +0200, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> Sorry, I've just tried to reproduce the bug and I got a FTBS in
> testing, but not with the unstable version.
Which architecture did you test the build on?
With a newly updated amd64 unstable pbuilder chroot:
$ pdebuild --buildresult
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + fixed-upstream patch
Bug #657046 [alpine] alpine: Alpine uses DES-56 in violation of RFC 5751
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream and patch.
--
657046: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657046
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Control: tag -1 + fixed-upstream patch
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:38:15 -0500, Robert Tomsick wrote:
> This issue was reported upstream and a patch produced
> (http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3428168&group_id=264924&atid=1128048),
>
In the meantime committed in upstream m
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 685653 + pending
Bug #685653 [mlterm,mlterm-tiny] mlterm,mlterm-tiny: missing copyright file
after squeeze->wheezy upgrade
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
685653: http:/
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Guido Trotter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During the Dublin BSP I fixed this bug.
> Attached is a patch that solves the problem.
>
This is now uploaded to DELAYED/3.
Attaching correct diff (only change is the release name from
UNRELEASED to unstable)
Thanks,
Guido
nmu1.di
tags 642343 + patch
tags 642343 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for bootchart2 (versioned as 0.14.4-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
The uploaded package includes these patches:
* 0001-pybootchartgui-fix-parsing-o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 642343 + patch
Bug #642343 [pybootchartgui] pybootchartgui: list index out of range bug while
parsing
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 642343 + pending
Bug #642343 [pybootchartgui] pybootchartgui: list index out of range bug while
parsing
Added t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 685653 + patch
Bug #685653 [mlterm,mlterm-tiny] mlterm,mlterm-tiny: missing copyright file
after squeeze->wheezy upgrade
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
685653: http://bug
Hi,
During the Dublin BSP I fixed this bug.
Attached is a patch that solves the problem.
Thanks,
Guido
nmu.diff
Description: Binary data
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 684528 0.152-1+b1
Bug #684528 [elfutils] elfutils: FTBFS with new dpkg-buildpackage due to
build-arch split
Marked as found in versions elfutils/0.152-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
6845
found 684528 0.152-1+b1
thanks
Hello,
Sorry, I've just tried to reproduce the bug and I got a FTBS in
testing, but not with the unstable version.
Should we ask the release team to allow the transition to testing?
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 686833 + fixed pending
Bug #686833 [git-extras] git-extras - git-gh-pages - removes all files
Added tag(s) fixed and pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
686833: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi
tags 686833 + fixed pending
thanks
Hi,
Upstream has replied that the command should be removed, and I agree.
The command as it is right now is dangerous and of very little use (it
creates a branch and adds a dummy index.html to it).
I have prepared a package that removes the file so that it does
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 684825 - fixed
Bug #684825 [src:elfutils] elfutils: FTBFS: md5.c:108:3: error: dereferencing
type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Werror=strict-aliasing]
Removed tag(s) fixed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please cont
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 unreproducible
Bug #684843 [src:krusader] krusader: FTBFS: tstring.h:137:5: error: 'make_pair'
was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by
argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive]
Added tag(s) unreproducibl
Control: tag -1 unreproducible
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:09:45 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: krusader
> Version: 1:2.3.0~beta1-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
>
> Hi
Your message dated Sat, 08 Sep 2012 13:17:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#684890: fixed in beaker 1.5.4-4+squeeze1
has caused the Debian Bug report #684890,
regarding CVE-2012-3458: Information disclosure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 684825 0.153-1
Bug #684825 [src:elfutils] elfutils: FTBFS: md5.c:108:3: error: dereferencing
type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Werror=strict-aliasing]
Marked as fixed in versions elfutils/0.153-1.
> thanks
Stopping proc
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 fixed 0.153-1
Unknown tag/s: 0.153-1.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-igno
Control: tags -1 fixed 0.153-1
Control: tags -1 - sid
Control: tags -1 + patch
Mark Wielaard writes:
> On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 09:07 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
>> build on amd64.
>>
>> Relevant part:
>> > gcc -D_GNU_SOURCE
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 686201 wishlist
Bug #686201 [icedove] Icedove: New Upstream (10.0.7)
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
686201: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
* Michael Stapelberg wrote [03.08.12 17:13]:
Hi Michael & Bart,
> In [1], womble notes that your OpenVZ provider might have disabled
> iptables. I think that's very likely the cause for your problem.
> [1] http://serverfault.com/questions/101022
I think this bug could be closed as it is probably n
I tried to rebuild the package using pbuilder, and looks like the
situation has changed. I am not getting the missed file anymore, but
rather a compilation failure: http://paste.debian.net/188591/.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 686454 2.8.8
Bug #686454 [xchat] CVE-2011-5129: xchat buffer overflow
There is no source info for the package 'xchat' at version '2.8.8' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.8.8'
Ignoring request to alter foun
Santiago Vila wrote:
> As a user, I don't really care that a package uses debhelper v5,
> that's an internal thing. I would much preferr to have it in wheezy
> even if the package is not perfect than not have it in wheezy at all.
PLease, ask the release team :* :)
--
.''`.The world brea
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 686454 2.8.8
Bug #686454 [xchat] CVE-2011-5129: xchat buffer overflow
There is no source info for the package 'xchat' at version '2.8.8' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.8.8'
Ignoring request to alter foun
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 686454 2.8.8
Bug #686454 [xchat] CVE-2011-5129: xchat buffer overflow
There is no source info for the package 'xchat' at version '2.8.8' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.8.8'
Marked as found in versions 2.
2012/9/8 Dmitry Shachnev :
> I doubt if re-adding a package after freeze (it was blocked by
> jcristau on 2012-08-04, see [1]) is possible.
>
> Anyway, please feel free to contact the release team asking for
> unblocking, maybe they don't share my opinion. The preferred way for
> this is filing a b
I doubt if re-adding a package after freeze (it was blocked by
jcristau on 2012-08-04, see [1]) is possible.
Anyway, please feel free to contact the release team asking for
unblocking, maybe they don't share my opinion. The preferred way for
this is filing a bug against "release.debian.org" pseudo
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Amaya wrote:
Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
The package is still of poor quality. It uses debhelper v5, deprecated
python-support, installs private modules into a public dir, etc. So
I'll suggest to not have it in wheezy unless someone explicitly
requests it.
Oh, I thought Santiag
Your message dated Sat, 08 Sep 2012 11:47:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#685170: fixed in llvm-defaults 0.14+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #685170,
regarding llvm: empty /usr/share/doc/llvm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
* Willi Mann wrote [17.06.12 12:34]:
Any progress on this? This should be a rather simple issue.
> My recommendation is to rename the binary of dconf. Maybe the binaries
> name could be changed to confdumper?
I think this would be a great proposal but from the Debian Policy:
http://www.debian.or
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 686543 normal
Bug #686543 [netcat-traditional] netcat.c:1797:16: error: expected ')' before
'DEBIAN_VERSION'
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
686543
severity 686543 normal
thanks
Hi Tech,
On 3 September 2012 00:57, Tech wrote:
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
I have been able to build this package successfully using pbuilder
[1], therefore I'm downgrading the severity of th
Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> The package is still of poor quality. It uses debhelper v5, deprecated
> python-support, installs private modules into a public dir, etc. So
> I'll suggest to not have it in wheezy unless someone explicitly
> requests it.
Oh, I thought Santiago Vila did so in #664989.
Anyw
Processing control commands:
> reopen 683998
Bug #683998 {Done: Holger Levsen } [munin] munin: allows
creation of sockets at arbitrary locations (/tmp file vulnerability)
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need
Control: reopen 683998
Control: fixed 683998 2.0.1-1
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 02:15:06PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> It has been closed by Holger Levsen .
I slightly disagree. I can see that this issue does not affect wheezy,
but the bug remains open in squeeze. Please only close it
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # setting found version to version in testing
> found 686626 aptitude/0.6.8.1-1
Bug #686626 [aptitude] aptitude: Should not arch-qualfy arch-less packages on
dpkg calls
The source aptitude and version 0.6.8.1-1 do not appear to match any binary
96 matches
Mail list logo
