Processed: reassign 641072 to gnome-bluetooth

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 641072 gnome-bluetooth 3.0.0-1 Bug #641072 [gnome-bluetooth] gnome control center hangs when clicking on bluetooth icon Ignoring request to reassign bug #641072 to the same package Bug #641072 [gnome-bluetooth] gnome control center hangs

Bug#641072: backtrace with gtk dbg packages

2011-09-09 Thread Praveen A
Should I install any other dbg packages? #0 0x7f53030b72c4 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 #1 0x7f53033326f4 in g_once_init_enter_impl () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #2 0x7f52e41f6ac4 in bluetooth_chooser_get_type () from /usr/lib

Processed: tagging 640969

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 640969 + confirmed Bug #640969 {Done: David Paleino } [bpython] Exits with: "ImportError: No module named bpython.cli" Added tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 640969: http://b

Bug#641072: gnome control center hangs when clicking on bluetooth icon

2011-09-09 Thread Praveen A
Package: gnome-bluetooth Severity: grave Version: 3.0.0-1 I cannot use bluetooth with gnome 3. It is working fine on a squeeze live system. Initial error message is (gnome-control-center:6819): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: specified class size for type `BluetoothChooser' is smaller than the parent ty

Bug#624588: marked as done (regina-normal: FTBFS on armel i386 mips powerpc s390 sparc (tests fail))

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:03:48 +1000 with message-id and subject line regina-normal tests passing has caused the Debian Bug report #624588, regarding regina-normal: FTBFS on armel i386 mips powerpc s390 sparc (tests fail) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Processed: tagging 640966

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 640966 + pending Bug #640966 [linux-2.6] Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc//maps, regression in fix for CVE-2011-1020 Bug #640973 [linux-2.6] Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc//maps, regression in fix for CVE-2011-1020 Bug #6410

Bug#640960: CVE-?????: broken CTCP parsing can be used to crash the core

2011-09-09 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Hi, it seems ubuntu people backported the fix against 0.6.1: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/79454811/quassel_0.6.1-0ubuntu1_0.6.1-0ubuntu1.2.diff.gz maybe this could help with the squeeze backport? -Timo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "

Processed: tagging 622063

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # seems patch does fix it! thanks ;) > tags 622063 + pending Bug #622063 [src:mailfilter] mailfilter: FTBFS: socket.cc:123:37: error: invalid conversion from 'const SSL_METHOD*' to 'SSL_METHOD*' Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing

Bug#629671: libpuzzle: FTBFS: vector_ops.c:74: undefined reference to `sqrt'

2011-09-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Ana Guerrero (10/09/2011): > Dear PhotoTools Maintainers, > > Do you have time for looking at this bug or would like help with a > NMU? KiBi said ENOTIME for pkg-phototools-related stuff, and I'm sure people there would appreciate the love you're proposing for that package, so I'll be bold and s

Bug#615787: tokyotyrant: ftbfs with gold or ld --no-add-needed

2011-09-09 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:53:48AM +, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: tokyotyrant > Version: 1.1.40-4 > Severity: important > Tags: sid > User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de > Usertags: no-add-needed > > The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with > ld --no-add-needed. For d

Bug#629671: libpuzzle: FTBFS: vector_ops.c:74: undefined reference to `sqrt'

2011-09-09 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 04:13:44PM +0200, Didier Raboud wrote: > Source: libpuzzle > Version: 0.9-4 > Severity: serious > Tags: wheezy sid > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid,

Bug#618096: solved in 1.4.7

2011-09-09 Thread Ana Guerrero
Hi, Both bugs #618096 and #625397, are solved in the latest upstream release: 1.4.7. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#639313: marked as done (tulip: FTBFS: /bin/sh: java: not found)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 22:19:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#639313: fixed in tulip 3.6.0dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #639313, regarding tulip: FTBFS: /bin/sh: java: not found to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#636397: New deja-dup upload in unstable?

2011-09-09 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 11:30:58PM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: >> I am expecting to upload 19.91 (yes, I know it is the unstable branch, >> but should work ok), but I need itstool package first to be uploaded >> to Debian (#639788).

Bug#616282: marked as done (tulip: replace doxygen and texlive-* build dependencies with doxygen-latex)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 22:19:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#616282: fixed in tulip 3.6.0dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #616282, regarding tulip: replace doxygen and texlive-* build dependencies with doxygen-latex to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Processed: Re: [Evolution] Bug#641052: evolution uses insecure connection when storing the sent message to the sent folder

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 641052 src:evolution-data-server3 Bug #641052 [evolution] evolution uses insecure connection when storing the sent message to the sent folder Bug reassigned from package 'evolution' to 'src:evolution-data-server3'. Bug No longer marked a

Bug#641052: [Evolution] Bug#641052: evolution uses insecure connection when storing the sent message to the sent folder

2011-09-09 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
reassign 641052 src:evolution-data-server3 forwarded 641052 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648277 clone 641052 -1 reassign -1 evolution-data-server thanks On ven., 2011-09-09 at 23:41 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > Reporting the security issue myself, see > http://article.gmane.org/

Bug#636397: New deja-dup upload in unstable?

2011-09-09 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 11:30:58PM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: > I am expecting to upload 19.91 (yes, I know it is the unstable branch, > but should work ok), but I need itstool package first to be uploaded > to Debian (#639788). Once it is done, I will upload it. I'd rather not miss the

Bug#641052: evolution uses insecure connection when storing the sent message to the sent folder

2011-09-09 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
Package: evolution Version: 3.0.3-1 Severity: serious Reporting the security issue myself, see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.oss.general/5833 for more info. -- Yves-Alexis -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Arc

Processed: reassign 640560 to libvtk5-dev, forcibly merging 506992 640560

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 640560 libvtk5-dev Bug #640560 [src:itksnap] itksnap: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib64/libpq.so', needed by `InsightSNAP'. Stop. Bug reassigned from package 'src:itksnap' to 'libvtk5-dev'. Bug No longer marked as f

Bug#634140: marked as done (libgeotiff-dfsg: Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not libjpeg62-dev)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:32:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#634140: fixed in libgeotiff-dfsg 1.3.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #634140, regarding libgeotiff-dfsg: Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not libjpeg62-dev to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#636397: New deja-dup upload in unstable?

2011-09-09 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > Hi Jose! > > deja-dup still has a RC bug in unstable due to the libnotify 0.7 > transition. Uploading either the package currently in experimental or a > newer upstream release in unstable would fix this issue. > > Could you make a new deja-d

Bug#640813: marked as done (java-wrappers: find_java_runtime function is broken for openjdk)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:17:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#640813: fixed in java-wrappers 0.1.23 has caused the Debian Bug report #640813, regarding java-wrappers: find_java_runtime function is broken for openjdk to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Processed: severity of 636559 is serious

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 636559 serious Bug #636559 [nepenthes] FTBFS with libcurl4-gnutls-dev 7.21.7-1 on alpha Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 636559: http://bugs.debian.

Bug#625222: desktop-base: 625222: spacefun plymouth theme needs plymouth-drm

2011-09-09 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On ven., 2011-09-09 at 22:24 +0200, Paul Wise wrote: > It looks like the spacefun plymouth theme needs plymouth-drm for the > script module[1]. > > I'm not sure how exactly this could be fixed, but two thoughts come to > mind. > > desktop-base could recommend plymouth-drm to pull the module in bu

Bug#640960: marked as done (CVE-?????: broken CTCP parsing can be used to crash the core)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:47:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#640960: fixed in quassel 0.7.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #640960, regarding CVE-?: broken CTCP parsing can be used to crash the core to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Processed: fixed 465598 in 1.2.6-2

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 465598 1.2.6-2 Bug #465598 {Done: Thijs Kinkhorst } [libsdl-image1.2] libsdl-image1.2: Security update 1.2.5-2etch1 is not installed Bug Marked as fixed in versions sdl-image1.2/1.2.6-2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#625222: desktop-base: 625222: spacefun plymouth theme needs plymouth-drm

2011-09-09 Thread Paul Wise
It looks like the spacefun plymouth theme needs plymouth-drm for the script module[1]. I'm not sure how exactly this could be fixed, but two thoughts come to mind. desktop-base could recommend plymouth-drm to pull the module in but allow folks who don't use plymouth to keep it off their systems.

Bug#631950: remmina-plugin-nx unable to connect with libssh-4_0.5.0-2

2011-09-09 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hi Laurent. It seems this has been fixed in their repo,... can you cherry pick that patch? https://red.libssh.org/issues/60 Chris. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#629567: Intending to NMU emacs23

2011-09-09 Thread Philipp Kern
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 05:09:19PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2011-09-09 13:54 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > I intend to upload the attached NMU to DELAYED/2-days later today. I > > hope that's ok with you? It makes emacs23 buildable again in sid and > > adjusts the build-dependency on libj

Processed: notfound 637031 in 0.9.13-1, notfixed 637031 in 0.9.13-1

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 637031 0.9.13-1 Bug #637031 {Done: Alessio Treglia } [libass4] libass4: Crash with freetype 2.4.6 Bug No longer marked as found in versions libass/0.9.13-1. > notfixed 637031 0.9.13-1 Bug #637031 {Done: Alessio Treglia } [libass4] libass

Processed: retitle 640966 to Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc//maps, regression in fix for CVE-2011-1020

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 640966 Oops when unprivileged user reads /proc//maps, regression > in fix for CVE-2011-1020 Bug #640966 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-(amd64|686): kernel oops after Bug #640973 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-(amd64|686): kernel oops

Processed (with 1 errors): Re:

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 640973 linux-image-2.6.32-5-(amd64|686): kernel oops after Bug #640973 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Non-privileged "fuser" oopses Bug #640966 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Non-privileged "fuser" oopses Bug #641018 [l

Bug#640973: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Non-privileged "fuser" oopses kernel

2011-09-09 Thread Thomas Shanks
Oh dear... I hit send on the second rename email hours ago, before the merges, while in a wifi-free area... would not mind if someone undoes this action or picks a more suitable title.

Bug#640966: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel Oops with Google Chrome

2011-09-09 Thread Chris McIntyre
Indeed, I checked the logs and that's how I came to realize it was a kernel update that caused problem. Thanks for the quick response!

Bug#640195: Processed: your mail

2011-09-09 Thread Anton Gladky
> Bug #640195 [paraview] paraview-dev transition > Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' I am not agree with that. Why is that bug serious? It does not break anything. I would keep it "normal". Anton On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands

Processed (with 1 errors): your mail

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 640973 linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Non-privileged "fuser" oopses Bug #640973 [linux-2.6] Non-privileged "fuser" oopses kernel Bug #640966 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel Oops with Google Chrome Bug #641018 [linux-2.6] linux-im

Processed: Re: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: kernel oops after upgrade to 2.6.32-35squeeze1

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 640966 641040 Bug#640966: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel Oops with Google Chrome Bug#641040: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: kernel oops after upgrade to 2.6.32-35squeeze1 Bug#640973: Non-privileged "fuser" oopses kernel Bug#641018: linux-

Processed: Re: Bug#633704: horrible Segmentation fault

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 633704 patch Bug #633704 [uni2ascii] horrible Segmentation fault Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 633704: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633704 Debian Bug

Bug#641038: icedtea-plugin: uninstallable on amd64/sid due to openjdk update

2011-09-09 Thread brian m. carlson
Package: icedtea-plugin Version: 1.1-1 Severity: grave Due to the update to openjdk that Breaks icedtea-web, icedtea-plugin is uninstallable on amd64/sid. Because I need a working Java plugin for various purposes, this prevents me from updating openjdk 6 and 7. Please fix this as soon as possible

Bug#564968: marked as done (bobot++: ftbfs with gcc-4.5)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:32:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#564968: fixed in bobot++ 1:1.97-10.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #564968, regarding bobot++: ftbfs with gcc-4.5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#629567: Intending to NMU emacs23

2011-09-09 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi, On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 08:48:59AM -0500, Rob Browning wrote: > Philipp Kern writes: > > I intend to upload the attached NMU to DELAYED/2-days later today. I > > hope that's ok with you? It makes emacs23 buildable again in sid and > > adjusts the build-dependency on libjpeg to use the right

Bug#629567: Intending to NMU emacs23

2011-09-09 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2011-09-09 13:54 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > I intend to upload the attached NMU to DELAYED/2-days later today. I > hope that's ok with you? It makes emacs23 buildable again in sid and > adjusts the build-dependency on libjpeg to use the right dev package. I haven't tested it, but the attac

Processed: your mail

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 632861 by 640488 Bug #632861 [libvtkedge-dev] libvtkedge-dev: package needs template (*.txx) files Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 632861: 640488 > block 634739 by 640488 Bug #634739 [libvtkedge] libvtkedge: Wrong lice

Bug#628303: marked as done (libjboss-remoting-java: FTBFS: CoyoteInvoker.java:82: org.jboss.remoting.transport.coyote.CoyoteInvoker is not abstract and does not override abstract method log(org.apache

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 14:47:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#628303: fixed in libjboss-remoting-java 2.5.3.SP1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #628303, regarding libjboss-remoting-java: FTBFS: CoyoteInvoker.java:82: org.jboss.remoting.transport.coyote.CoyoteInvoker i

Bug#640859: freeplane: FTBFS due to invalid JAVA_HOME value

2011-09-09 Thread Miguel Landaeta
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 04:12:20PM +0200, Eric Lavarde wrote: > few questions before I start to look into it: > - your pbuilder chroot is on sid pure? > - do you have JAVA_HOME and/or JAVACMD defined in your environment/chroot? > > I'm a bit at loss because it should work without any environment >

Processed: your mail

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 641018 important Bug #641018 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel-OOPS (sometimes) when using lsof Bug #640966 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel Oops with Google Chrome Bug #640973 [linux-2.6] Non-privileged "fuser" oo

Bug#641018: Kernel-OOPS (sometimes) when using lsof

2011-09-09 Thread Vincent Blut
Package: linux-2.6 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Same issue here, it appears (to me) only when you call 'lsof' with unprivileged user. Obviously this behavior was introduced by the last security upgrade (2.6.32-35squeeze1). Dmesg (with the stack trace) i

Processed: forcibly merging 640966 641018

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 640966 641018 Bug#640966: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel Oops with Google Chrome Bug#641018: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel-OOPS (sometimes) when using lsof Bug#640973: Non-privileged "fuser" oopses kernel Forcibly Merged 640966 640

Bug#640859: freeplane: FTBFS due to invalid JAVA_HOME value

2011-09-09 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hello Miguel, few questions before I start to look into it: - your pbuilder chroot is on sid pure? - do you have JAVA_HOME and/or JAVACMD defined in your environment/chroot? I'm a bit at loss because it should work without any environment variable defined, and surely /bin/java shouldn't be a va

Processed: affects 640966

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 640966 release.debian.org Bug #640966 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel Oops with Google Chrome Bug #640973 [linux-2.6] Non-privileged "fuser" oopses kernel Added indication that 640966 affects release.debian.org Added indicatio

Processed (with 1 errors): merging 640966 641018, severity of 640966 is serious

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 640966 641018 Bug#640966: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel Oops with Google Chrome Bug#641018: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Kernel-OOPS (sometimes) when using lsof Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `severity' don't ma

Bug#624882: marked as done (regina-normal: FTBFS: i18nutils.cpp:115:9: error: 'ptrdiff_t' was not declared in this scope)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:48:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#624882: fixed in regina-normal 4.90-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #624882, regarding regina-normal: FTBFS: i18nutils.cpp:115:9: error: 'ptrdiff_t' was not declared in this scope to be marked as done. Thi

Bug#556318: marked as done (FTBFS with binutils-gold)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:48:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#556318: fixed in regina-normal 4.90-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #556318, regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Processed: ygraph: diff for NMU version 0.16~cvs20090218-1.1

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 639064 + patch Bug #639064 [src:ygraph] ygraph: FTBFS: please build-depend on libjpeg-dev, not libjpeg62-dev | libjpeg-dev Added tag(s) patch. > tags 639064 + pending Bug #639064 [src:ygraph] ygraph: FTBFS: please build-depend on libjpeg-dev

Bug#639064: ygraph: diff for NMU version 0.16~cvs20090218-1.1

2011-09-09 Thread gregor herrmann
tags 639064 + patch tags 639064 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ygraph (versioned as 0.16~cvs20090218-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - PGP/GPG key

Bug#633744: Intending to NMU emacs23

2011-09-09 Thread Rob Browning
Philipp Kern writes: > Hi Rob, > > I intend to upload the attached NMU to DELAYED/2-days later today. I > hope that's ok with you? It makes emacs23 buildable again in sid and > adjusts the build-dependency on libjpeg to use the right dev package. That's probably fine. It's going to be at leas

Bug#625379: marked as done (libpri: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:18:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#625379: fixed in libpri 1.4.11.3-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #625379, regarding libpri: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#625379: libpri: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror

2011-09-09 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 10:33:37AM +, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: libpri > Version: 1.4.11.3-1 > Severity: important > Tags: wheezy sid > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.6 ftbfs-werror > > This package builds with -Werror, and GCC 4.6 triggers new warnings > whic

Bug#641015: upower: depends on libimobiledevice2 from experimental [amd64]

2011-09-09 Thread Teodor
Package: upower Version: 0.9.13-1 Severity: serious Justification: package cannot be installed or upgraded Dear Maintainer, According to the buildd logs, the upower [amd64] package was uploaded by maintainer directly and it seems that was not build on a clean 'unstable' chroot because it depends

Bug#625756: marked as done (electric-fence: FTBFS due to OOM with gcc-4.5)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:47:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#625756: fixed in electric-fence 2.1.17 has caused the Debian Bug report #625756, regarding electric-fence: FTBFS due to OOM with gcc-4.5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Bug#554644: marked as done (FTBFS with binutils-gold)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:02:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#554644: fixed in gnet 2.0.8-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #554644, regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#629567: Intending to NMU emacs23

2011-09-09 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi Rob, I intend to upload the attached NMU to DELAYED/2-days later today. I hope that's ok with you? It makes emacs23 buildable again in sid and adjusts the build-dependency on libjpeg to use the right dev package. Kind regards Philipp Kern diff -Nru emacs23-23.3+1/debian/changelog emacs23-23.

Bug#554644: FTBFS with binutils-gold

2011-09-09 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 10:19:05PM +0100, Peter Fritzsche wrote: > Source: gnet > Version: 2.0.8-1 > Severity: minor > User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de > Usertags: no-add-needed > > Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The > important difference is that --no-add-ne

Processed: notfound 640638 in 1.8.13-4, notfound 633775 in 1.8.13-4

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 640638 1.8.13-4 Bug #640638 {Done: Ondřej Surý } [libbotan-1.8.2] libbotan-1.8.2: Outdated binary packages in unstable Bug #633775 {Done: Ondřej Surý } [libbotan-1.8.2] libbotan-1.8.2 breaks packages that depend on version 1.8.2 The

Bug#640969: marked as done (Exits with: "ImportError: No module named bpython.cli")

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:32:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#640969: fixed in bpython 0.10.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #640969, regarding Exits with: "ImportError: No module named bpython.cli" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#556526: hurd - FHS violation: /libexec

2011-09-09 Thread Gergely Nagy
Jérémie Koenig writes: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Philipp Kern wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:40:05PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: >>> Hurd violates the FHS by using /libexec. This name seems to be only used >>> by init and /etc/ttys. >> >> I'm upgrading this to serious on the groun

Bug#556526: hurd - FHS violation: /libexec

2011-09-09 Thread Jérémie Koenig
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:40:05PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: >> Hurd violates the FHS by using /libexec. This name seems to be only used >> by init and /etc/ttys. > > I'm upgrading this to serious on the grounds that this package is only > u

Processed: your mail

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 629416 serious Bug #629416 [plymouth] plymouth: breaks wheeze upgrade with initramfs failure Severity set to 'serious' from 'critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 629416: http://bugs.

Bug#629942: python-ecryptfs: missing dependency on python

2011-09-09 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:52:54 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Version: 0.92-2 > There's no such version, fwiw. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile

2011-09-09 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 04:18:50PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > Ahem, so I must quote it: > > #!/bin/sh -e > > tmp=`pwd`/debian/leave > > if echo $DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS | grep -vq noopt; then > optflag="-O2" > fi > if echo $DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS | grep -vq nostrip; then > stripflag="-s" > fi Does n

Bug#629942: marked as done (python-ecryptfs: missing dependency on python)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:52:54 +0200 with message-id <4e69e1f6.9070...@progress-technologies.net> and subject line Re: python-ecryptfs: missing dependency on python has caused the Debian Bug report #629942, regarding python-ecryptfs: missing dependency on python to be marked as done.

Bug#628353: octave-symbolic: FTBFS: Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-close.c: 737: _dl_close: Assertion `map->l_init_called' failed!

2011-09-09 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 01:34:14PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > Thanks to a note from John W. Eaton that the development version doesn't > suffer from this problem, I tracked down the fix and have prepared a > suitable patch against the Debian package. Please consider this to fix > the octave-symb

Bug#565092: marked as done (qgo: ftbfs with gcc-4.5)

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 08:49:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#565092: fixed in qgo 1.5.4-r3-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #565092, regarding qgo: ftbfs with gcc-4.5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Processed: your mail

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 629942 pending Bug #629942 [python-ecryptfs] python-ecryptfs: missing dependency on python Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 629942: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport

Processed: your mail

2011-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 640195 serious Bug #640195 [paraview] paraview-dev transition Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 640195: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c

Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile

2011-09-09 Thread Josip Rodin
Since my reasoning here didn't seem to leave a particular positive dent with those tech-ctte members who have responded so far, I would just like to solicit Ian Jackson's input, given his role in defining and implementing the debian/rules calling convention originally. In other worse, if I can't c

Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile

2011-09-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 04:18:34PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > (I don't recall if anyone tried to loop you into that discussion; if that > didn't happen, that was a flaw in that discussion process to be sure.) Nope, sorry, I missed that. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To

Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile

2011-09-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 04:53:01PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > And still, this is a Makefile so you can quickly reuse Makefile snippets > > > that others have been writing to add support for supplementary targets > > > (like get-orig-source) or even to influence the environment (like the >