Your message dated Sun, 07 Aug 2011 06:32:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#627020: fixed in fglrx-driver 1:11-7-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #627020,
regarding mesa-utils: glxgears and glxinfo does not work
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Sun, 07 Aug 2011 06:32:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#627020: fixed in fglrx-driver 1:11-7-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #627020,
regarding fglrx-glx: recent multiarch changes break fglrx
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Sun, 07 Aug 2011 06:32:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#627020: fixed in fglrx-driver 1:11-7-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #627020,
regarding qa.debian.org: With update of kernel 2.6.38-2, xserver-xorg-core
2:1.10.1-2, fglrx no longer works (11-4, 11-5)
to be
Hi,
Squeeze is already released and this Debian bug just prevents luajit
from entering into testing (wheezy). Thus bug name ("unsuitable for
squeeze") is a bit misleading.
I'm a maintainer of uwsgi source package [1], which builds up several
dozen binary packages -- and just one of them (uw
Your message dated Sun, 7 Aug 2011 03:00:06 +0200
with message-id <201108070300.06891.yann...@iaora.eu>
and subject line Unreproductible here too
has caused the Debian Bug report #636765,
regarding goldendict: run and eat CPU but does not start
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Package: libxine-dev
Version: 1.1.90hg+20110516+847d4f89a4fb-1
Severity: serious
Justification: kdebase-runtime ftbfs
Tags: patch
Hi,
Typical amd64 experimental system. Trying to build kdebase-runtime,
I get:
$ debian/rules build
/usr/share/pkg-kde-tools/qt-kde-team/2/dhmk.pl
-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # yeah, sure, why not a bit higher?
> severity 636903 important
Bug #636903 [reportbug] reportbug: failed
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> forcemerge 620225 636903
Bug#620225: GTK+ UI errors: segfaults, floating-point exceptions, pang
Dear maintainer,
Recently you fixed one or more security problems and as a result you closed
this bug. These problems were not serious enough for a Debian Security
Advisory, so they are now on my radar for fixing in the following suites
through point releases:
lenny (5.0.9)
squeeze (6.0.3)
Pleas
Your message dated Sat, 06 Aug 2011 19:56:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#626673: fixed in pmake 1.111-2+squeeze1
has caused the Debian Bug report #626673,
regarding pmake: insecure temporary files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sat, 06 Aug 2011 19:56:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#626673: fixed in pmake 1.111-1+lenny1
has caused the Debian Bug report #626673,
regarding pmake: insecure temporary files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Sat, 6 Aug 2011 20:54:44 +0200
with message-id <20110806185444.ga11...@pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de>
and subject line yada dependency of cvssuck removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #636884,
regarding cvssuck: yada modifies build-dependencies when rebuilding
to be mark
Source: z88dk
Version: 1.8.ds1-8
Severity: serious
User: dioc...@debian.org
Usertags: remove-yada
yada modifies build-dependencies in the clean target of debian/rules,
which is against the release team's RC policy for wheezy:
http://bugs.debian.org/334164
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/rc_policy
Source: zmakebas
Version: 1.2-1
Severity: serious
User: dioc...@debian.org
Usertags: remove-yada
yada modifies build-dependencies in the clean target of debian/rules,
which is against the release team's RC policy for wheezy:
http://bugs.debian.org/334164
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/rc_policy.
Source: systune
Version: 0.5.6-0.1
Severity: serious
User: dioc...@debian.org
Usertags: remove-yada
yada modifies build-dependencies in the clean target of debian/rules,
which is against the release team's RC policy for wheezy:
http://bugs.debian.org/334164
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/rc_poli
Source: libapache2-mod-rpaf
Version: 0.5-3
Severity: serious
User: dioc...@debian.org
Usertags: remove-yada
yada modifies build-dependencies in the clean target of debian/rules,
which is against the release team's RC policy for wheezy:
http://bugs.debian.org/334164
http://release.debian.org/wheezy
Source: xfonts-biznet
Version: 3.0.0-21
Severity: serious
User: dioc...@debian.org
Usertags: remove-yada
yada modifies build-dependencies in the clean target of debian/rules,
which is against the release team's RC policy for wheezy:
http://bugs.debian.org/334164
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/rc
Source: libnss-db
Version: 2.2.3pre1-3.2
Severity: serious
User: dioc...@debian.org
Usertags: remove-yada
yada modifies build-dependencies in the clean target of debian/rules,
which is against the release team's RC policy for wheezy:
http://bugs.debian.org/334164
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/r
Source: libapache2-mod-auth-pam
Version: 1.1.1-8
Severity: serious
User: dioc...@debian.org
Usertags: remove-yada
yada modifies build-dependencies in the clean target of debian/rules,
which is against the release team's RC policy for wheezy:
http://bugs.debian.org/334164
http://release.debian.org/
Source: libapache2-mod-auth-plain
Version: 2.0.50
Severity: serious
User: dioc...@debian.org
Usertags: remove-yada
yada modifies build-dependencies in the clean target of debian/rules,
which is against the release team's RC policy for wheezy:
http://bugs.debian.org/334164
http://release.debian.org
Source: ldapdns
Version: 2.06-3.4
Severity: serious
User: dioc...@debian.org
Usertags: remove-yada
yada modifies build-dependencies in the clean target of debian/rules,
which is against the release team's RC policy for wheezy:
http://bugs.debian.org/334164
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/rc_polic
Source: henplus
Version: 0.9.7.ds1-2
Severity: serious
User: dioc...@debian.org
Usertags: remove-yada
yada modifies build-dependencies in the clean target of debian/rules,
which is against the release team's RC policy for wheezy:
http://bugs.debian.org/334164
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/rc_po
Source: aylet
Version: 0.5-2
Severity: serious
User: dioc...@debian.org
Usertags: remove-yada
yada modifies build-dependencies in the clean target of debian/rules,
which is against the release team's RC policy for wheezy:
http://bugs.debian.org/334164
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/rc_policy.txt
Source: gramofile
Version: 1.6-8
Severity: serious
User: dioc...@debian.org
Usertags: remove-yada
yada modifies build-dependencies in the clean target of debian/rules,
which is against the release team's RC policy for wheezy:
http://bugs.debian.org/334164
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/rc_policy
Source: cvssuck
Version: 0.3.cvs20060124-1
Severity: serious
User: dioc...@debian.org
Usertags: remove-yada
yada modifies build-dependencies in the clean target of debian/rules,
which is against the release team's RC policy for wheezy:
http://bugs.debian.org/334164
http://release.debian.org/wheezy
Source: cvsconnect
Version: 0.1.cvs20001202-1
Severity: serious
User: dioc...@debian.org
Usertags: remove-yada
yada modifies build-dependencies in the clean target of debian/rules,
which is against the release team's RC policy for wheezy:
http://bugs.debian.org/334164
http://release.debian.org/whe
Dear maintainer,
Recently you fixed one or more security problems and as a result you closed
this bug. These problems were not serious enough for a Debian Security
Advisory, so they are now on my radar for fixing in the following suites
through point releases:
lenny (5.0.9)
Please prepare a mini
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
wrote:
> GNOME #656069 filed:
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=656069
FYI, the bug has been fixed upstream.
Regards,
--
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
http://linux.thai.net/~thep/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-
Your message dated Sat, 06 Aug 2011 16:33:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#636348: fixed in smuxi 0.8-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #636348,
regarding does not start due to notifications problem
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
> I think you meant --with-plugin-dir ?
Yes, I did.
Kind regards,
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 08/06/2011 05:46 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
The b0rkage I see is different among webkit- and gecko-based browsers. On
webkit-based browsers (I've tried epiphany 3.0.4 and chromium 13.0.782),
visiting file:///usr/share/doc/scala-doc/html/index.html (or, equivalently,
http://localhost/cgi-bin
Package: scala-doc
Version: 2.9.0.1.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Trying to work offline with Scala I've stumbled upon the problem that the API
HTML documentation shipped by scala-doc seems to be completely broken, at least
with graphical browsers. (Arguably: it is sort of usable with a textual web
bro
On Thursday, August 04, 2011 12:34:13 PM roucaries bastien wrote:
> What is your arch ?
As the subject says: i386. The build was actually done on an amd64 system,
but using an i386 pbuilder chroot running with "linux32 pbuilder build --
basetgz /var/cache/pbuilder/base-i386.tgz cernlib_20061220+
Package: vmtk
Version: 0.9.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hello,
Your patckage FTNFS on all plateforms:
cd
/build/buildd-vmtk_0.9.0-4-amd64-EwnXXz/vmtk-0.9.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/vtkVmtk/ComputationalGeometry
&& /usr/bin/g++ -DvtkvmtkComputationalGeometry_EXPORTS -g -Wall -fPIC -
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # fixed == found is illogical, and the BTS treats it as present in that
> version. this should just be -done
> notfixed 628675 1.111-3
Bug #628675 {Done: Guillem Jover } [pmake] pmake: LIBDIR
should not have been switched to multiarch path yet
B
Your message dated Sat, 06 Aug 2011 15:02:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#539028: fixed in pperl 0.25-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #539028,
regarding pperl: FTBFS: tests failed directory
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Sat, 06 Aug 2011 15:02:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#539028: fixed in pperl 0.25-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #539028,
regarding pperl: FTBFS: pperl: perl script failed to start: No such file or
directory
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
This bug effects me as well.
I recompiled the package from testing using the patch from message #15
(11_reparent_dialogs.patch). It works correctly and now xchat is
functional for me. Thank you! Hopefully this gets fixed upstream.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debia
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 636765 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #636765 [goldendict] goldendict: run and eat CPU but does not start
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
636765: http://
tags 636765 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
Hi!
I can't to reproduce the bugreport.
Please show Your environment (packages, architecture, etc)
> Package: goldendict
> Version: 1.0.2~git20110805-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: sid
> Justification: renders package unusable
> Hi,
> With 1.0.2~git2011
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 539028 + pending
Bug #539028 [pperl] pperl: FTBFS: pperl: perl script failed to start: No such
file or directory
Bug #533934 [pperl] pperl: FTBFS: tests failed directory
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing
tag 539028 + pending
thanks
Some bugs in the pperl package are closed in revision
e7b2e827c1ef61b798dd40b02dd286706611b3d7 in branch 'master' by Damyan
Ivanov
The full diff can be seen at
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-perl/packages/pperl.git;a=commitdiff;h=e7b2e82
Commit message:
Package: gecko-mediaplayer
Version: 1.0.4-1
Followup-For: Bug #636800
Same problem here. I had to rebuild the package. I think you meant
--with-plugin-dir ?
Best regards
Torquil Sørensen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (700, 'unstable')
Arch
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 636854 src:linux-2.6 2.6.39-3
Bug #636854 [src:linux-2.6] linux>=2.38 CD/DVD on PPC/Mac no longer works with
udev because a powerpc specific module is not compiled
Ignoring request to reassign bug #636854 to the same package
Bug #636854
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 636296 + pending
Bug #636296 [src:boinc] Please transition to libnotify 0.7
Added tag(s) pending.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
636296: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636296
Deb
Package: linux-image-2.6.39-2-powerpc64
Version: 2.6.39-3
Severity: grave
Source: linux-2.6
(And a new one: reportbug segfaults here and no time to investigate
why, so back to old way to submit bugs.)
No comments from message
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2011/07/msg00630.html on
debian-k
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.19.1-5
Severity: serious
Every 5 minutes in daemon.log:
Aug 4 18:49:04 debian init: Id "co" respawning too fast: disabled for
5 minutes
Aug 4 18:55:45 debian init: Id "co" respawning too fast:
disabled for 5 minutes
Aug 4 19:02:26 debian init: Id "co" respawning t
Your message dated Sat, 06 Aug 2011 10:32:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#619734: fixed in taxbird 0.16-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #619734,
regarding taxbird: Version for 2011 available upstream
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Sat, 06 Aug 2011 09:17:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#630270: fixed in gnoemoe 2.2.0+dfsg-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #630270,
regarding gnoemoe: Please transition to libnotify 0.7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 06 Aug 2011 09:17:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#625346: fixed in gnoemoe 2.2.0+dfsg-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #625346,
regarding gnoemoe: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Sat, 06 Aug 2011 09:17:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#554645: fixed in gnoemoe 2.2.0+dfsg-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #554645,
regarding FTBFS with binutils-gold
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
close 636359
thanks
Fixed in lua5.1 version 5.1.4-10
--
Enrico Tassi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 636359
Bug#636359: prosody: does not start after latest upgrade (complains about
missing libs)
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Lukas Anzinger
> thanks
Your message dated Sat, 06 Aug 2011 08:48:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#621954: fixed in unicap 0.9.5-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #621954,
regarding unicap: FTBFS: v4l.c:52:28: fatal error: linux/videodev.h: No such
file or directory
to be marked as done.
This means that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 621954 + patch
Bug #621954 [src:unicap] unicap: FTBFS: v4l.c:52:28: fatal error:
linux/videodev.h: No such file or directory
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
621954: http:/
tags 621954 + patch
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for unicap (versioned as 0.9.5-1.1). The diff
is attached to this message.
Regards.
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Sat Aug 6 08:03:45 UTC 2011
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: libcql-parser-perl
> tags 636378 + pending
Bug #636378 [wnpp] ITP: libcql-parser
Package: sshmenu-gnome
Version: 3.18-1
Severity: serious
Justification: 7
There are 8 newly obsolete packages:
libart2-ruby1.8, libgconf2-ruby, libgconf2-ruby1.8, libgnome2-ruby,
libgnome2-ruby1.8, libgnomecanvas2-ruby1.8, libpanel-applet2-ruby,
libpanel-applet2-ruby1.8
-- System Information:
De
57 matches
Mail list logo
