On 12/24/2010 12:38 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> status update please.
blocked by #603554, waiting for otavio.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~
On 12/24/2010 12:39 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Status update please?
blocked by #603554, waiting for otavio.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~
Your message dated Fri, 24 Dec 2010 06:32:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#606810: fixed in systraq 0.0.20081217-1+squeeze2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #606810,
regarding systraq: Leaves unowned files after purge (if perl-modules is absent)
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Le jeudi 23 déc. 2010 à 16:05:36 (+0100), Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
> On 23/12/2010 11:12, Julien Valroff wrote:
> >Le jeudi 23 déc. 2010 à 09:36:08 (+0100), Joost van Baal a écrit :
> >>Hi Julien,
> >>
> >>Op Thu 23 Dec 2010 om 06:35:19 +0100 schreef Julien Valroff:
> >>>Le mardi 21 déc. 2010 à 09:08
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 03:36:42PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I see this is now uploaded. Unblocked, should migrate in 5 days if no
> new RC bugs appear; and removal hint added for libmail-spf-query-perl.
I submitted a freeze exception request for qpsmtpd_0.84-5. Thanks for doing
the advance
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 06:26:10PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hi Julien,
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:34:50PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 20:15:19 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 3:31 PM
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 607857 - patch
Bug #607857 [tex-common] texlive-base: don't put files under /usr/local
Removed tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
607857: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg
tags 607857 - patch
thanks
Hi,
>The question is *WHY* an ls-R file is created there, because none
>of *our* scripts (AFAIS) creates it, all call mktexlsr with
>a list of arguments, so do every package using dh_installtex and
>triggers.
When mktexlsr is called, it creates ls-R file (yes, you kno
Your message dated Fri, 24 Dec 2010 02:32:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#607207: fixed in denyhosts 2.6-8.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #607207,
regarding denyhosts: Fails to upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Just uploaded with the following fix.
-Steve
diff -u -r denyhosts-2.6/debian/denyhosts.postinst
denyhosts-changed/debian/denyhosts.postinst
--- denyhosts-2.6/debian/denyhosts.postinst 2010-12-15 03:59:56.0
-0600
+++ denyhosts-changed/debian/denyhosts.postinst 2010-12-23 20:10:54.3013
Hi Hideki,
what are you trying to do? Why do you not try to understand what I wrote
several times?
Yes, we know that we create /u/l/s/texmf, this is allowed by policy.
The question is *WHY* an ls-R file is created there, because none
of *our* scripts (AFAIS) creates it, all call mktexlsr with
a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 607857 tex-common
Bug #607857 [texlive-binaries] texlive-base: don't put files under /usr/local
Bug reassigned from package 'texlive-binaries' to 'tex-common'.
> tags 607857 patch
Bug #607857 [tex-common] texlive-base: don't put files und
reassign 607857 tex-common
tags 607857 patch
thanks
Hi,
I've tried it with pbuilder chroot environment, installed tex-common.
>r...@hp115:/# ls -l /usr/local/share/
>total 0
>drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 40 Dec 21 08:40 man
>drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 40 Dec 24 01:26 texmf
Oops, there's texmf!
>r..
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 607903 openafs/1.4.10+dfsg1-2
Bug #607903 [openafs-modules-dkms] Fails to build kernel module: missing
dependency on libc6-dev
Bug Marked as found in versions openafs/1.4.10+dfsg1-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfixed 607903 openafs-modules-dkms/1.5.77-1
Bug #607903 [openafs-modules-dkms] Fails to build kernel module: missing
dependency on libc6-dev
The source openafs-modules-dkms and version 1.5.77-1 do not appear to match any
binary packages
Bug No
Sorry, that was stupid of me.
That said, dkms's dependencies are weird; it depends on "make |
build-essential | dpkg-dev", which is a rather weird set, since
buildessential depends on make and dpkg-dev, and dpkg-dev itself
depends on make as well. If it really just means 'make', it should
depend o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 607903 openafs-modules-dkms/1.5.77-1
Bug #607903 [openafs-modules-dkms] Fails to build kernel module: missing
dependency on libc6-dev
The source openafs-modules-dkms and version 1.5.77-1 do not appear to match any
binary packages
Bug Marke
fixed 607903 openafs-modules-dkms/1.5.77-1
thanks
Phil Miller writes:
> build-essential depends on "libc6-dev | libc-dev", and is assumed for
> building any packages, per Policy 4.2.
Yeah, but DKMS modules are something of a special case because the end
user isn't building the package. They're
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 607903
Bug #607903 {Done: Phil Miller } [openafs-modules-dkms] Fails
to build kernel module: missing dependency on libc6-dev
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
607903: http://bugs.debian.org/c
reopen 607903
thanks
Phil Miller writes:
> build-essential depends on "libc6-dev | libc-dev", and is assumed for
> building any packages, per Policy 4.2.
openafs-modules-dkms builds binaries when it is installed. This bug
report is about a missing dependency for this, not about a
build-dependenc
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:24:33 -0600
with message-id
and subject line Not a real bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #607903,
regarding Fails to build kernel module: missing dependency on libc6-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
On Dec 24, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I don't know. You say there's a RC bug in our lvm package, so you could
> provide a patch or NMU, or at least give some details about this since
> you seem to know what this is about and there's no details in the bug
> log...
This is what the upstream maintaine
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 607693 squeeze-can-defer
kthxbye
Can be fixed through security.d.o if it's not ready by release, so
tagging accordingly.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 607304 important
Bug #607304 [libsdl1.2] dosbox: locks up because SDL tries to access cdrom
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
607304: http://bugs.d
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 21:21:06 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 16, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > > CCing the release team to raise awareness for this issue.
> > I have no idea what this is about, but it seems you guys need to fight
> LVM is unreliable in squeeze.
>
> > it out and then come
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:30:42 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Package: live-build
> Severity: serious
>
> now that live-installer was fixed to be disabled through preseeding,
> live-builds needs to include boot entries for
> installer-without-live-installer and installer-with-live-installer.
>
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 14:37:18 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Package: live-build
>
> so that we don't forget.. before squeeze, we need to update the squeeze
> syslinux menu stuff for what we discussed on debconf (run/install etc.).
>
This doesn't sound RC to me. Either way, status update ple
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 14:36:13 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Package: live-build
>
> so that we don't forget.. before squeeze, we need to update, at least,
> the forensics package list, and review the rest.
>
What's the status of this?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital sign
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 20:01:33 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got updated digest.rb from upstream author, so it would be better
> to use this. Please consider to apply to your package, thanks.
>
Care to prepare a NMU diff?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital sign
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:32:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#606263: fixed in awstats 6.9.5~dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #606263,
regarding Multiple security issues
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:46:51 +0100, Marc Dequènes wrote:
> fixed 588276 0.7.0-2
> thanks
>
Does this mean there is a known fix for this bug?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
severity 607304 important
kthxbye
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 21:17:57 +0100, Peter Keel wrote:
> Package: libsdl1.2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: upstream
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
I don't think the severity is justified, downgrading.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digit
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:34:50PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 20:15:19 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at
This needs to be fixed for squeeze, we can't support this package if it
can't be built; and there's a bunch of reverse dependencies so removal
looks painful. Adding debian-java to cc, help is needed to fix
libhibernate3-java's build.
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 13:14:30 -0430, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 06:30:02PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 02:53:02 +0300, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
tag 606263 pending
thanks
> http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-4369
Fixed in repo:
http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/awstats.git;a=commit;h
Package: openafs-modules-dkms
Version: 1.4.12.1+dfsg-3
Severity: grave
Hi,
dkms can't build the module since it's lacking a dependency on
libc6-dev, from config.log:
configure:3391: $? = 0
configure:3380: gcc -v >&5
Using built-in specs.
Target: arm-linux-gnueabi
Configured with: ../src/configure
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
jcris...@debian.org).
> usertag 582953 squeeze-can-defer
Bug#582953: kmail deleted all non-local incoming mail settings on upgrade
There were
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 582953 squeeze-can-defer
tag 582953 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 21:33:15 +0100, Juha Jäykkä wrote:
> Package: kmail
> Version: 4:4.4.3-1
> Severity: critical
> Tags: squeeze sid
> Justification: causes serious data loss
>
>
Hi:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:36 AM, brian m. carlson
wrote:
> ksh is not building on mips or mipsel. From what I can see from the
> build logs, it looks like certain headers are not getting included or
> not getting included correctly, but I don't have access to a mips or
> mipsel machine. Th
Package: fai-setup-storage
Version: 3.4.6
Severity: serious
Justification: setup-storage is unusable
setup-storage as shipped in 3.4.6 will fail with the following error:
Compilation failed in require at /usr/sbin/setup-storage line 92.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/sbin/setup-storage
Hi Julien,
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:34:50PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 20:15:19 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Please do push your changes and prepa
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 584653 squeeze-is-blocker
usertag 584663 squeeze-is-blocker
kthxbye
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 20:15:19 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Jonas Smedegaard w
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 07:30:20 +0100, Luca Bruno wrote:
> tag 606282 + confirmed
> tag 606282 + pending
> thanks
>
> brian m. carlson scrisse:
>
> > ksplice-objmanip needs to link statically with libbfd. According to
> > the binutils-dev package description:
>
> Brian is completely right on
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 16:39:42 +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> tags 606145 + patch
> kthxbye
>
> The problem here is that when writing out the file, we use fputs. fputs
> only operates on C strings and stops when it reaches a NUL byte. Of
> course, since UTF-16 is a double-byte character set
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
jcris...@debian.org).
> usertag 590147 squeeze-can-defer
Bug#590147: akregator crashes at start
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now:
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 590147 squeeze-can-defer
tag 590147 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 11:58:27 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Package: akregator
> Version: 4:4.4.4-1
> Severity: important
>
> All of sudden, akregator now fails to start with g
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:04:39 +0100
with message-id <20101223210439.ga29...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#606371: severity
has caused the Debian Bug report #606371,
regarding kopete: Kopete freezes immediately when opening opening settings
dialog (TV-card present
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 553173 important
Bug #553173 [javascript-common] javascript-common overrides /javascript
globally in apache2
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
5
severity 553173 important
kthxbye
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:27:40 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote:
> severity 474913 serious
> thanks
>
This bug was set to RC severity with no explanation, by someone who
doesn't appear to be the maintainer. Downgrading again. There's a
suggestion in the bug log to
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 598020 squeeze-can-defer
tag 598020 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 14:31:56 +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Package: insserv
> Version: 1.14.0-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Hey,
>
> I just installed a fresh new squeeze.
>
> I also
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
jcris...@debian.org).
> usertag 598020 squeeze-can-defer
Bug#598020: barfs when there are "invalid" init scripts
There were no usertags set.
U
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 521860 release-notes
Bug #521860 [db4.7-util] libpam-modules: libdb upgrade silently breaks
pam_userdb.so
Added indication that 521860 affects release-notes
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
affects 521860 release-notes
kthxbye
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 19:01:10 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
> usertag 521860 squeeze-can-defer
> tag 521860 squeeze-ignore
> kthxbye
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 22:45:59 +, Clint Adams wrote:
>
> > http://f
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> I think it would be best if this matter would be decided upon before
> the release of Squeeze, or not too long after it, so as to avoid
> further breakages in early kernel updates for Squeeze.
I have a couple of (possibly naïve) questions that would help
On 2010-12-23 19:32 +0100, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 05:10:28PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> I don't see how this follows. People having an xterm-like terminal that
>> is not compatible with Debian's xterm terminfo entry can easily work
>> around it by setting TERM=xterm-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
jcris...@debian.org).
> usertag 603405 squeeze-can-defer
Bug#603405: gucharmap: missing source code needed to update unicode tables
There were
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 603405 squeeze-can-defer
tag 603405 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 14:06:12 -0500, Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
> Source: gucharmap
> Version: 1:2.30.3-1
> Justification: Policy 2.2.1
> Severity: serious
>
> The source package
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 19:09:11 +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> tags 605565 + help
> thanks
>
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 11:53:55AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > > I'm sorry to report this, but gnustep-base-runtime 1.20.1-5 fails to
> > > upgrade on one of my machines due to a not running gdomap.
severity 607775 important
thanks
Hi
The xorg.conf file is not part of the vnc package. So I doubt that
this is really a vnc bug.
Lowering the severity until we have concluded what the real problem is.
// Ola
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:34:33AM +0500, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 607775 important
Bug #607775 [vnc4server] /usr/bin/vnc4server: cannot start vncserver
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
607775: http://bugs.debian.o
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 05:10:28PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> I don't see how this follows. People having an xterm-like terminal that
> is not compatible with Debian's xterm terminfo entry can easily work
> around it by setting TERM=xterm-r6 or similar when they connect to a
> Debian machine. W
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 604234 squeeze-will-remove
kthxbye
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 16:26:37 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> But I can reproduce the problem quite easily:
> $ sudo cowbuilder --login
> # apt-get install emacspeak-ss
> ...
> Fetched 35.9 MB in 1min 1s (57
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
jcris...@debian.org).
> usertag 606527 squeeze-can-defer
Bug#606527: root upgrade vulnerability in exim4 (CVE-2010-4345)
There were no usertag
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 606527 squeeze-can-defer
tag 606527 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
This will most likely get fixed via security.d.o if it's not ready by
squeeze release, so tagging as can-defer.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 545625 squeeze-will-remove
kthxbye
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 16:52:44 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Are you aware, that this rc bug is still open in testing? It was fixed
> in 9.8.4-2, but testing still has 9.8.4-1:
>
> $ rmadison ec
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 606808 important
Bug #606808 [echoping] echoping crashes sometimes when used against HTTPS host
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
606808: http://bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 603554 wishlist
Bug #603554 [debian-installer] update isolinux theme for squeeze
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
603554: http://bugs.debian.org/c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
jcris...@debian.org).
> usertag 607762 squeeze-can-defer
Bug#607762: dbus-glib: requires higher versioned build-dep on glib
There were no user
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 607762 squeeze-can-defer
tag 607762 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 13:22:09 -0800, Andres Salomon wrote:
> It would appear that I'd hit the following in configure.ac:
>
> PKG_CHECK_MODULES(DBUS_GLIB, gobject-2.0 >= 2.24, have_gl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
jcris...@debian.org).
> usertag 521860 squeeze-can-defer
Bug#521860: libpam-modules: libdb upgrade silently breaks pam_userdb.so
There were no
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 521860 squeeze-can-defer
tag 521860 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 22:45:59 +, Clint Adams wrote:
> http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=880991&tstart=0
>
It doesn't look like we'll be able to get this fixed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 606308 important
Bug #606308 [clamav-daemon] clamav-daemon: clamd segfaults immediately after
launch
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
606308: htt
severity 606308 important
kthxbye
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:43:47 +0100, Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote:
> severity 606308 grave
> found 606308 0.96.5+dfsg-1
> thanks
>
This bug seems to only affect a non-default setting, so I don't think it
qualifies as grave. Downgrading accordingly.
Cheers,
Ju
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
jcris...@debian.org).
> usertag 531546 squeeze-can-defer
Bug#531546: empty graphs due to 'A DB Exec Failed' Poller[0] ERROR
There were no user
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 531546 squeeze-can-defer
tag 531546 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
Hi,
it's not clear to me what the status of this bug is, or how serious it
is. However it doesn't sound like it should either delay squeeze or get
cacti removed, so I'm tagging the bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
jcris...@debian.org).
> usertag 572606 squeeze-can-defer
Bug#572606: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D
There were no usertags set.
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 572606 squeeze-can-defer
tag 572606 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 07:26:08 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Hi! It seems this bug crept back in with the latest upload, so I have
> re-opened it. I didn't see anything new in the
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 02:53:02 +0300, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> tag 606263 pending
> thanks
>
> > http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-4369
>
> Fixed in repo:
> http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/awstats.git;a=commit;h=aaf089d10ce4e12e6d499089407d93c62511e9c0
>
> > http
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
jcris...@debian.org).
> usertag 588418 squeeze-can-defer
Bug#588418: libatlas-test: Empty package
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 588418 squeeze-can-defer
tag 588418 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 08:38:02 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Uploaded. Thanks for the patch!
>
Newer versions of atlas seem to FTBFS, so this isn't making it into
squeeze. Tagging
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
jcris...@debian.org).
> usertag 606959 + squeeze-can-defer
Bug#606959: logrotate script should set correct owner/group
There were no usertags
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 606959 + squeeze-can-defer
tag 606959 + squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:33:51 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Package: asterisk
> Severity: serious
> Version: 1:1.6.2.9-2
>
> Hi,
>
> It looks like the logrotate script is n
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 16:33 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 08:15:23 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 03:06 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > >* debian/control
> > > - latex209-base: need texlive-latex-base, not
> > >
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 22:06:12 +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
> wrote:
> > What does antlr3 need from the network? If the resource it needs might
> > disappear during the squeeze lifetime, it is still RC, I think.
>
> It tries to download the gun
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:17:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#582311: fixed in c-icap 1:0.1.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #582311,
regarding Links against libclamav
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:28:01 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 15:40:55 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>
> > This patch has come from two upstream commits to fix the CVE and the
> > debdiff for an nmu is attached. If it's ok with you, I'll go ahead with if
> > the maintainer
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 15:40:55 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> This patch has come from two upstream commits to fix the CVE and the
> debdiff for an nmu is attached. If it's ok with you, I'll go ahead with if
> the maintainer hasn't already done so in a day or so.
>
> jmm has confirmed there
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 606780 1:1.8.2-1
Bug #606780 [zabbix-frontend-php] zabbix-frontend-php: package fails to upgrade
properly from lenny
Bug Marked as found in versions zabbix/1:1.8.2-1.
> found 606795 1:1.8.2-1
Bug #606795 [zabbix-server-mysql] zabbix-server-
On 23.12.10 Hideki Yamane (henr...@debian.or.jp) wrote:
Hi,
> Attach piuparts logs here, could you check it please?
>
Just a short notice: please compress logs before sending. This mail
didn't make it to the maintainer mailing list due to its size.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
--
To UNSUBSCR
On 2010-12-23 04:17 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
>>> It seems that current plain FreeBSD kernel generates events
>>> that fully corresponds to cons25 entry.
>>>
>>> It just uses different definitions for kbs and kdch1 wrt Linux,
>>>
>>> Linux: kbs=\177 kdch1=\E[3~
>>> FreeBSD/cons25 kbs=^
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 605292 - squeeze
Bug #605292 [mono-runtime] /usr/bin/mono segfaults in mono_shared_area
Bug #587948 [mono-runtime] mono-gac: gacutil segfaults
Bug #589707 [mono-runtime] Running mono apps can prevent upgrade from working
Removed tag(s) squeez
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 09:58:20 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 12/06/2010 01:56 AM, Andrew Lee wrote:
> > Both newer version of libfm and pcmanfm are bug fixes release from
> > upstream. Would this be an exception, please?
> >
>
> Sorry but those have big changes. I'm not sure that it's wise
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 08:15:23 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 03:06 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > latex209 (25.mar.1992-12.4) unstable; urgency=medium
> > .
> >* Non-maintainer upload.
> >* debian/control
>
On Fr, 24 Dez 2010, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > does not exists, no ls-R file will be created there.
>
> It seems not.
It is *very* strange.
> Attach piuparts logs here, could you check it please?
THis convolute of unreadable bunch? I tried quite some time
to get something useful out of it, wit
On 23/12/2010 11:12, Julien Valroff wrote:
Le jeudi 23 déc. 2010 à 09:36:08 (+0100), Joost van Baal a écrit :
Hi Julien,
Op Thu 23 Dec 2010 om 06:35:19 +0100 schreef Julien Valroff:
Le mardi 21 déc. 2010 à 09:08:45 (+0100), Joost van Baal a écrit :
Op Tue 21 Dec 2010 om 08:38:52 +0100 schreef
On Do, 23 Dez 2010, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> I've confirmed same issue with texlive-xetex, but it is caused by another
> package... texlive-binaries.
Yes, we know *which* program is generating the ls-R files, thanks.
> > Processing triggers for tex-common ...
> > Running mktexlsr. This may ta
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 03:00:37 -0800, Devin Carraway wrote:
> Based on initial findings and assuming a problem-free test period, I'd support
> shipping 0.84 with the backported plugin if the release team agrees.
>
I see this is now uploaded. Unblocked, should migrate in 5 days if no
new RC bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 607857 texlive-binaries
Bug #607857 [texlive-base] texlive-base: don't put files under /usr/local
Bug reassigned from package 'texlive-base' to 'texlive-binaries'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions texlive-base/2009-11.
> thanks
S
reassign 607857 texlive-binaries
thanks
Hi,
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:19:00 +0100
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> Well, that directory wasn't created by texlive-base, but by
> tex-common (which was installed as dep). In theory that dir should be
> gone after purging of tex-common. Could you check if this i
Package: sbox-dtc
Version: 1.11.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: squeeze rc policy §3
Quoting from http://release.debian.org/squeeze/rc_policy.txt
Packages must not modify their own or other packages conffiles
programmatically. (The only correct way to modify a conffile is
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo