Bug#604626: libmedc-dev and libmed-dev: error when trying to install together

Package: libmed-dev,libmedc-dev Version: libmed-dev/2.3.6-4 Version: libmedc-dev/2.3.6-4 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Date: 2010-11-23 Architecture: amd64 Distribution: sid Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same

Bug#604225: mailscanner: installation fails

Hi, I also tested it with piuparts but works fine (snip) > Setting up libdbd-sqlite3-perl (1.29-3) ... > Setting up libfilesys-df-perl (0.92-3+b1) ... > Setting up libole-storage-lite-perl (0.19-1) ... > Setting up mailscanner (4.79.11-2.1) ... > > Creating config file /etc/MailScan

Bug#584663: imagemagick uses gs without -P-

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 01:58:51PM +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote: Too late now for [#583183] ... I now noticed that imagemagick also uses gs, and invokes it with -dPARANOIDSAFER but without -P-. Do *NOT* "cross-post" bug info between bugreports! ... You do *not* help if "spamming" the b

Processed: Re: autolog: package purge (after dependencies removal) fails

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 604208 patch Bug #604208 [autolog] autolog: package purge (after dependencies removal) fails Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 604208: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor

Bug#604208: autolog: package purge (after dependencies removal) fails

tags 604208 patch thanks Hi, I fixed this bug as below and test with piuparts is fine. Please apply it, thanks. diff -Nru autolog-0.40/debian/changelog autolog-0.40/debian/changelog --- autolog-0.40/debian/changelog 2010-11-11 14:06:32.0 +0900 +++ autolog-0.40/debian/changelog

Bug#601859: wesnoth-1.9: Bad error handling in postinst script

There was a 1.9.1-1 when I made the earlier report. I've since upgraded to 1.9.2-1. In order to do so, I had to install wesnoth-1.8-core. :-) (I didn't upgrade immediately because I was in the middle of a campaign and other games have trained me not to upgrade when I still care about my save fi

Bug#584663: imagemagick uses gs without -P-

Dear Jonas, Sorry, but do not understand. >>Too late now for [#583183] ... I now noticed that imagemagick >>also uses gs, and invokes it with -dPARANOIDSAFER but without -P-. > > Do *NOT* "cross-post" bug info between bugreports! ... > You do *not* help if "spamming" the bugreports. :-( I wanted

Processed: unarchiving 461644, reopening 461644, reassign 604457 to linux-2.6, forcibly merging 604457 461644

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 461644 Bug #461644 {Done: maximilian attems } [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.18-5-xen-686: Exporting an lvm-on-md LV to Xen as a disk results in kernel errors and corrupt filesystems Unarchived Bug 461644 > # Still present in lenny > reop

Bug#584663: imagemagick uses gs without -P-

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:36:39AM +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote: Too late now for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583183#54 (as that is archived, un-changeable). I now noticed that imagemagick also uses gs, and invokes it with -dPARANOIDSAFER but without -P-. Do *NOT*

Bug#603882: util-vserver: startup script breaks boot (on sparc)

On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, micah anderson wrote: On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 04:13:20 +0100 (CET), "Daniel Hokka Zakrisson" wrote: What dietlibc version was used to build the binaries? Does it have http://people.linux-vserver.org/~dhozac/p/m/delta-dietdirent-fix01.diff applied? IIRC this was one way that

Processed (with 1 errors): reopening 461644, reassign 604457 to linux-2.6, forcibly merging 604457 461644

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Still present in lenny > reopen 461644 Failed to reopen 461644: Not altering archived bugs; see unarchive. > reassign 604457 linux-2.6 2.6.26-25lenny1 Bug #604457 [linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686] linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686: Raid10 exporting LV

Processed: tagging 604457

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 604457 + patch moreinfo Bug #604457 [linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686] linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686: Raid10 exporting LV to xen results in error "can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 64k" Added tag(s) moreinfo and patch. > thanks St

Bug#604457: linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686: Raid10 exporting LV to xen results in error "can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 64k"

On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 02:31 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I have attempted to adjust this for Debian's stable kernel version > (2.6.26) and the result is attached. Please could you test this, > following the instructions at >

Bug#604457: linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686: Raid10 exporting LV to xen results in error "can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 64k"

On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 11:48 +0100, Wouter D'Haeseleer wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686 > Version: 2.6.26-25lenny1 > Severity: critical > Justification: causes serious data loss > > When accessing an lv using configured on a raid10 using xen results in > corrupted data as the followi

Bug#603807: marked as done (faad segfaults on amd64 due to incorrect pointer size)

Your message dated Tue, 23 Nov 2010 01:32:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#603807: fixed in faad2 2.7-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #603807, regarding faad segfaults on amd64 due to incorrect pointer size to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: Bug#594150: regression in apt-transport-https interop with apt-cacher

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 594150 regression in apt-transport-https interop with apt-cacher Bug #594150 [libcurl3-gnutls] CURLOPT_TIMEOUT defaults to zero seconds Bug #594153 [libcurl3-gnutls] CURLOPT_TIMEOUT defaults to zero seconds Changed Bug title to 'regression

Bug#588418: libatlas-test: Empty package

tags 588418 + patch thanks On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 at 16:01:53 +0900, Ryo IGARASHI wrote: > Today I found that current libatlas-test package is completely empty. It seems that doing `make check` and `make ptcheck` during the build produces some binaries that look a bit like tests. I have no idea whet

Processed: Re: Bug#588418: libatlas-test: Empty package

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 588418 + patch Bug #588418 [libatlas-test] libatlas-test: Empty package Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 588418: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588418 Debi

Bug#604604: qemu-kvm: vm entry failed with error 0xffffffff; kvm_run returned -22

Package: qemu-kvm Version: 0.13.0+dfsg-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After 0.12.5+dfsg-5 -> 0.13.0+dfsg-2 upgrade kvm doesn't start anymore. I get an error immediately: $ kvm kvm: vm entry failed with error 0x kvm_run returned -22 -- Package-specific info

Bug#602810: #602810 ia32-libs fails in postinst due to wrong version conditioning prior to dpkg-divert

Hi Goswin, just tested with 20101117, works fine now. Thanks! Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#604207: marked as done (slurm-llnl-slurmdbd: package purge (after dependencies removal) fails)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:25:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604207: fixed in slurm-llnl 2.1.15-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #604207, regarding slurm-llnl-slurmdbd: package purge (after dependencies removal) fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#604551: marked as done (should schedule auxiliary packages for installation)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:22:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604551: fixed in live-build 3.0~a7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #604551, regarding should schedule auxiliary packages for installation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#604551: marked as done (should schedule auxiliary packages for installation)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:21:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604551: fixed in live-build 2.0.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #604551, regarding should schedule auxiliary packages for installation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#604133: marked as done (live-installer: should remove debian-installer-launcher from target)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:22:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604133: fixed in live-installer 28 has caused the Debian Bug report #604133, regarding live-installer: should remove debian-installer-launcher from target to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#604126: marked as done (should schedule auxiliary packages for installation)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:22:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604126: fixed in live-installer 28 has caused the Debian Bug report #604126, regarding should schedule auxiliary packages for installation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#604027: marked as done (needs to include apt-mirror-setup by default)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:22:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604027: fixed in live-build 3.0~a7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #604027, regarding needs to include apt-mirror-setup by default to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#604027: marked as done (needs to include apt-mirror-setup by default)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:21:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604027: fixed in live-build 2.0.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #604027, regarding needs to include apt-mirror-setup by default to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#603974: marked as done (needs to reconfigure console-setup)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:22:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#603974: fixed in live-installer 28 has caused the Debian Bug report #603974, regarding needs to reconfigure console-setup to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#603662: software-center does not install anything

On 11/21/2010 02:24 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote: sudo aptd -td --replace This command leads to the following output. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/aptd", line 25, in import aptdaemon.core File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/aptdaemon/core.py", line 69, in

Processed: limit source to monobristol, tagging 582581

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #monobristol (0.60.1-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=grave > # > # * Fix external bristol call (Closes: #582581 LP:#660627) > #+ debian/patches/02_fix_bristol_call: Added > # > limit source monobristol Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing a

Bug#603975: live-build should provide console-setup-udeb available to debian-installer

tag 603975 - patch close 603975 thanks it's enough to reconfigure console-setup in live-installer (#603974), live-build doesn't need to be updated, therefore closing this bug. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.

Processed: Re: live-build should provide console-setup-udeb available to debian-installer

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 603975 - patch Bug #603975 [live-build] live-build should provide console-setup-udeb available to debian-installer Removed tag(s) patch. > close 603975 Bug#603975: live-build should provide console-setup-udeb available to debian-installer 'c

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: live-installer should depend and use console-setup-udeb

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 603974 needs to reconfigure console-setup Bug #603974 [live-installer] live-installer should depend and use console-setup-udeb Changed Bug title to 'needs to reconfigure console-setup' from 'live-installer should depend and use console-s

Bug#603974: live-installer should depend and use console-setup-udeb

retitle 603974 needs to reconfigure console-setup tag 603974 - tag tag 603974 pending thanks it's a different fix for the same problem, applied in svn, uploading shortly. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net I

Bug#604256: Help with Debian package maintenance (bug 604256)

Hi Raphael, Raphael Bossek writes: > One questions. Will the patch work if xerces fix your bug report too ? > I do not like to have the scenario where the xerces-c people update > their package and XSD stops working. It will work. The patch simply changes the encoding used in the output documen

Processed: dash: diff for NMU version 0.5.5.1-7.3

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 546528 + pending Bug #546528 [dash] dash's preinst shouldn't rely on /bin/sh Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 546528: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=5465

Bug#546528: dash: diff for NMU version 0.5.5.1-7.3

tags 546528 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for dash (versioned as 0.5.5.1-7.3) and uploaded it to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards, Adam diff -u dash-0.5.5.1/debian/changelog dash-0.5.5.1/debian/changelog --- dash-0.5.5.1/debian

Bug#584663: imagemagick uses gs without -P-

Too late now for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583183#54 (as that is archived, un-changeable). I now noticed that imagemagick also uses gs, and invokes it with -dPARANOIDSAFER but without -P-. Good thing this bug is now "fixed". (I will not report a bug against imagemagick, no n

Processed: Re: Bug#602660: petsc: FTBFS on armel

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 602660 petsc: FTBFS on armel, mips, s390, likely mipsel, at HDF5 test Bug #602660 [petsc] petsc: FTBFS on armel Changed Bug title to 'petsc: FTBFS on armel, mips, s390, likely mipsel, at HDF5 test' from 'petsc: FTBFS on armel' > severity

Bug#604256: Help with Debian package maintenance (bug 604256)

Hi Boris, great news. One questions. Will the patch work if xerces fix your bug report too ? I do not like to have the scenario where the xerces-c people update their package and XSD stops working. Greetings, Raphael 2010/11/22 Boris Kolpackov : > Hi Raphael, > > Boris Kolpackov writes: > >> >

Bug#602333: /usr/bin/fusermount: fusermount allows unmount any filesystem

Ubuntu has now added the reference CVE-2010-3879 to https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/670622 and marked in "confirmed". Other interesting references: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651183 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651598 Cheers, Paul Paul Szabo p...@maths.usyd.edu.a

Bug#591206: License updated (flvplayer)

Hi, > $ find . -name "*swf*" > ./jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/media/img/flv_player.swf > ./examples/media/sample.swf > > How important are those files? Could those be replaced or removed without > affecting application functionality? I found nothing about using the flv_player.swf in sources. Seems t

Processed: Re: live-installer: needs to install lvm when lvm is selected

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 604126 should schedule auxiliary packages for installation Bug #604126 [live-installer] live-installer: needs to install lvm when lvm is selected Changed Bug title to 'should schedule auxiliary packages for installation' from 'live-insta

Bug#604126: live-installer: needs to install lvm when lvm is selected

retitle 604126 should schedule auxiliary packages for installation tag 604126 pending clone 604126 -1 reassign -1 live-build tag -1 pending thanks needs fixes in both live-installer and live-build, both have been updated in svn resp. git. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH

Bug#600320: Installation: set password for root; did not create a user; could not login after 1st reboot.

Hello, I'm trying to help a bit on triaging installation reports. Here, the main problem (as per the bug title and part of the report) seems to be (quoting John Hunter [2010-10-16]): > I set up the root password but declined to create any > [more] users. The install apparently finished OK and the

Bug#602869: closed by Daniel Baumann (Bug#602869: fixed in gadmin-openvpn-server 0.1.5-2)

reopen 602869 thanks > gadmin-openvpn-server (0.1.5-2) unstable; urgency=low > . >* Updating standards version to 3.9.0. >* Adding patch to move logfiles to /var/log (Closes: #602869). >* Updating standards version to 3.9.1. >* Updating logfiles.patch. I'm re-opening this bugrep

Processed: Re: Bug#602869 closed by Daniel Baumann (Bug#602869: fixed in gadmin-openvpn-server 0.1.5-2)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 602869 Bug #602869 {Done: Daniel Baumann } [gadmin-openvpn-server] gadmin-openvpn-server: puts logfile in /etc instead of /var/log 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remo

Processed: speech-dispatcher

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 586753 normal Bug #586753 [speech-dispatcher] upgrade broke speech-dispatcher Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 586753: http://bugs.debian.o

Bug#603375: doxygen: segfaults when building libxr documentation

Hi, I use doxygen 1.7.2-1 in experimental to build libxr, but still segfault. % LANG=C LC_ALL=C SRCDIR=.. OUTDIR=. PROJECT="libxr" VERSION="1.0" gdb ../../doxygen-1.7.2/bin/doxygen GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2-debian Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or lat

Processed: Re: Bug#602660: petsc: FTBFS on armel

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 602660 important Bug #602660 [petsc] petsc: FTBFS on armel Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 602660: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?

Bug#604432: marked as done (Typo 'Recomments' instead of 'Recommends' in debian/control)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:47:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604432: fixed in debarchiver 0.9.6 has caused the Debian Bug report #604432, regarding Typo 'Recomments' instead of 'Recommends' in debian/control to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#602891: [ovs-dev] Bug#602891 closed by Simon Horman (Bug#602891: fixed in openvswitch 1.1.0~pre2-4)

On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 02:37:31PM +, Hector Oron wrote: > Hello, > > 2010/11/16 Ben Pfaff : > > I fixed the originally reported bug in openvswitch/1.1.0~pre2-3. > > Hector Oron reopened > > the bug without any comment, so I can only speculate why, but it is > > presumably because > > the pack

Bug#604049: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: data corruption with promise stex driver and use of device-mapper layers (lvm/dm-crypt/..)

>-Original Message- >From: Ben Hutchings [mailto:b...@decadent.org.uk] >Sent: 2010年11月19日 21:34 >To: Ed Lin - PTU; Jens Axboe; dm-de...@redhat.com >Cc: Markus Schulz; 604...@bugs.debian.org >Subject: Re: Bug#604049: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: data >corruption with promise stex driver a

Bug#590418: libxr: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [doxy] Segmentation fault

tags 590418 + patch thanks I use doxygen 1.7.2-1 in experimental, but still segfault. So not building doxygen's document for avoiding FTBFS. debdiff attached. -- Regards, dai GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765 B8D8 EA50 7839 619D D439 668E diff -Nru libxr-1.0/debian/changelog libxr-1

Processed: Re: Bug#590418: libxr: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [doxy] Segmentation fault

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 590418 + patch Bug #590418 [src:libxr] libxr: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [doxy] Segmentation fault Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 590418: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport

Bug#604424: marked as done (resume: could not stat the resume device file)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:05:00 +0100 with message-id <20101122180500.gb3...@downhill.g.la> and subject line Re: Bug#604424: Problem is in uswsusp package has caused the Debian Bug report #604424, regarding resume: could not stat the resume device file to be marked as done. This means

Bug#603602: marked as done (python-gamera-dev: python2.X/gamera -> python2.Y/gamera symlinks)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:02:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#603602: fixed in gamera 3.2.6-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #603602, regarding python-gamera-dev: python2.X/gamera -> python2.Y/gamera symlinks to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Processed: Re: Bug#604531: Unblock for debarchiver

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 604531 normal Bug #604531 [release.debian.org] Unblock for debarchiver Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was me...@dogguy.org). >

Bug#604531: Unblock for debarchiver

severity 604531 normal user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 604531 unblock thanks On 22/11/2010 18:09, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: serious > Tags: squeeze > There is no "serious" unblock requests. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://do

Bug#602728: marked as done (Applet didn't show up and standalone version didn't start)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:48:26 +0100 with message-id <4ceaacea.6040...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#602728: Applet didn't show up and standalone version didn't start has caused the Debian Bug report #602728, regarding Applet didn't show up and standalone version didn't start

Bug#604432: Typo 'Recomments' instead of 'Recommends' in debian/control

Hi I raised it to serious. :-) Fix uploaded and bug filed against release.debian.org to unblock it for next release. // Ola On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:35:38PM +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > Thanks a lot for this report! This is actually

Bug#604531: Unblock for debarchiver

Package: release.debian.org Severity: serious Tags: squeeze I would like you to unblock the debarchiver package (version 0.9.6). It has a mis-spelling in the control file (recomments instead of recommends) making all the recommends totally useless. I have uploaded a fix for that and I would like

Bug#604432: Typo 'Recomments' instead of 'Recommends' in debian/control

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Thanks a lot for this report! This is actually a very important if > not serious bug. Fixing it now! I set it to 'normal' at moment :) -- Kartik Mistry Debian GNU/Linux Developer IRC: kart_ | Identica: @kartikm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Processed: 604432 serious

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 604432 serious Bug #604432 [debarchiver] Typo 'Recomments' instead of 'Recommends' in debian/control Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 604432: http:

Bug#604220: marked as done (bootcd-mkinitramfs: package purge (after dependencies removal) fails)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:17:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604220: fixed in bootcd 3.22 has caused the Debian Bug report #604220, regarding bootcd-mkinitramfs: package purge (after dependencies removal) fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Processed: Salome bugs pending in NEW queue

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 602217 +pending Bug #602217 [salome-examples] salome-examples won't install Added tag(s) pending. > tags 601712 +pending Bug #601712 [src:salome] salome: FTBFS due to missing graphviz Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here.

Bug#604203: marked as done (wims: package purge (after dependencies removal) fails)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:47:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604203: fixed in wims 4.00-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #604203, regarding wims: package purge (after dependencies removal) fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#604203: wims: package purge (after dependencies removal) fails

Hello Lucas, thank you for this test. this issue is fixed with the newer release. Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > Package: wims > Version: 4.00-2 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: instest-20101120 instest > > Hi, > > While testing the installation of all packages in u

Bug#602728: Applet didn't show up and standalone version didn't start

Mon, Nov 22, 2010 ve 03:02:39PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy napsal: > Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Le dimanche 07 novembre 2010 à 19:46 +0100, Ondra 'Kepi' Kudlik a > > écrit : > > > > What’s the contents of /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/hamster (ls -l) ? > > > > > > $ LC_ALL=C ls -l /usr/lib/pymodules/p

Bug#602728: Applet didn't show up and standalone version didn't start

Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le dimanche 07 novembre 2010 à 19:46 +0100, Ondra 'Kepi' Kudlik a > écrit : > > > What’s the contents of /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/hamster (ls -l) ? > > > > $ LC_ALL=C ls -l /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/hamster/ > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root34 Nov 6 21:37 eds.py -

Bug#604216: ibod: installation fails

reassign 604216 ipppd merge 604211 604216 thanks Hi, It seems bug in ipppd. >Package: ipppd >Architecture: alpha amd64 arm armeb armel hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel >powerpc ppc64 sparc s390 sh4 sparc64 >Section: net >Depends: isdnutils-base (= ${binary:Version}), debconf (>=1.2.9) | >debco

Processed: Re: ibod: installation fails

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 604216 ipppd Bug #604216 [ibod] ibod: installation fails Bug reassigned from package 'ibod' to 'ipppd'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions ibod/1.5.0-4. > merge 604211 604216 Bug#604211: ipppd: installation fails Bug#604216: ibod:

Processed: Retitle to better name.

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package webfs Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'webfs' Limit currently set to 'package':'webfs' > retitle 603926 Policy violation when modifying a conf-file. Bug #603926 [webfs] Non-interactive upgrade fails. Chang

Bug#604472: firmware-b43-installer but after reboot I got a black screen!

Package: firmware-b43-installer Version: 4.150.10.5-4 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system I installed Debian testing (squeeze) minimal cd install. I'm using openbox desktop it works great! But when went I installing my wifi driver (bcm4312), I installed the package firmware-b

Bug#603319: marked as done (dmraid-activate does not handle DDF1-based disks properly)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:32:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#603319: fixed in dmraid 1.0.0.rc16-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #603319, regarding dmraid-activate does not handle DDF1-based disks properly to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#553502: marked as done (autolog exits on Segmentation Fault)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:32:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#553502: fixed in autolog 0.40-13 has caused the Debian Bug report #553502, regarding autolog exits on Segmentation Fault to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#601706: marked as done (ldap-account-manager: Package unremovable)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:47:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#601706: fixed in ldap-account-manager 3.1.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #601706, regarding ldap-account-manager: Package unremovable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#604439: marked as done (systemtap-runtime: fails to install, missing depends on adduser)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:17:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604439: fixed in systemtap 1.2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #604439, regarding systemtap-runtime: fails to install, missing depends on adduser to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#604457: linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686: Raid10 exporting LV to xen results in error "can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 64k"

Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686 Version: 2.6.26-25lenny1 Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss When accessing an lv using configured on a raid10 using xen results in corrupted data as the following syslog indicates: kernel: raid10_make_request bug: can't convert block a

Bug#603926: Debconf in non-interactive mode

On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:38:08PM +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > I could find good use of some advice on Debconf usage. > The recent automated package upgrade tests, conducted > by Lucas Nussbaum, hava revealed that my package Webfs > fails to upgrade properly from stable (1.21-5.1) to > te

Bug#604439: systemtap-runtime: fails to install, missing depends on adduser

Hi, On Montag, 22. November 2010, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Thanks for detecting this. Probably the reason I never saw this bug was > because 'adduser' is Priority Important. thanks for fixing this so fast! > You should be seeing it in all versions. It just depends if the OS > already has the g

Processed: Re: Bug#604439: systemtap-runtime: fails to install, missing depends on adduser

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 604439 +pending Bug #604439 [systemtap-runtime] systemtap-runtime: fails to install, missing depends on adduser Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 604439: http://bugs.debia

Bug#604439: systemtap-runtime: fails to install, missing depends on adduser

tags 604439 +pending thanks Thanks for detecting this. Probably the reason I never saw this bug was because 'adduser' is Priority Important. On 11/22/2010 03:05 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As per > definition of the release te

Bug#604439: systemtap-runtime: fails to install, missing depends on adduser

Package: systemtap-runtime Version: 1.2-4 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for a release, thus the

Bug#603807: marked as done (faad segfaults on amd64 due to incorrect pointer size)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:31:51 +0100 with message-id and subject line Fixed in sid has caused the Debian Bug report #603807, regarding faad segfaults on amd64 due to incorrect pointer size to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#549014: wmbubble: Patch to actually fix things by removing dependency on gdk

Subject: wmbubble: Patch to actually fix things by removing dependency on gdk Package: wmbubble Version: 1.46-2.1 Severity: normal *** Please type your report below this line *** The fix patched into -2.1 caused bug reports numbers #602122 and #602137 -- to wit, the application no longer behaves

Bug#583738: not working

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 08:24:18AM +0100, Peter Gervai wrote: Still present where? With which version of ghostscript did you test? Latest and greatest sid versions. Thanks. Especially for the detailed list of versions, and the note that other packages are *not* in sync. This is generally q

Bug#604198: marked as done (broken by CVE-2010-3864 patch in openssl)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:02:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604198: fixed in tor 0.2.2.18-alpha-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #604198, regarding broken by CVE-2010-3864 patch in openssl to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal