Processed: Re: Bug#587320: slim needs xauth , but not depends on it

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 587320 normal Bug #587320 [slim] slim needs xauth , but not depends on it Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' > tags 587320 moreinfo Bug #587320 [slim] slim needs xauth , but not depends on it Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping p

Bug#587320: slim needs xauth , but not depends on it

2010-07-07 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
severity 587320 normal tags 587320 moreinfo thanks Hi, On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:04:46 +0400 Sergey wrote: > Package: slim > Version: 1.3.0-1+lenny2 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Without xauth installed, i have "Cant execute login command" message > after login

Bug#586845: marked as done (mgltools-pybabel: depends on python (<< 2.6))

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jul 2010 22:18:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#586845: fixed in mgltools-pybabel 1.5.4.cvs.20090603-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #586845, regarding mgltools-pybabel: depends on python (<< 2.6) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#586848: marked as done (mgltools-support: depends on python (<< 2.6))

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jul 2010 22:02:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#586848: fixed in mgltools-support 1.5.4.cvs.20090603-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #586848, regarding mgltools-support: depends on python (<< 2.6) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#586841: marked as done (mgltools-molkit: depends on python (<< 2.6))

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jul 2010 22:02:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#586841: fixed in mgltools-molkit 1.5.4.cvs.20090603-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #586841, regarding mgltools-molkit: depends on python (<< 2.6) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#588272: marked as done (xfce4-notify doesn't support notification specs 1.1)

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jul 2010 21:17:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#588272: fixed in xfce4-notifyd 0.1.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #588272, regarding xfce4-notify doesn't support notification specs 1.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Processed: severity of 573259 is important

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # This bug is mitigated by gnome-session making it respawn > severity 573259 important Bug #573259 [gnome-panel] gnome-panel - dies on dbus restart Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#583991: Proposed solution

2010-07-07 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
I noticed that you already fixed this bug (and #570896) in your svn repository. Do you intend to upload soon? Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#588370: symbol not found: 'grub_xputs'

2010-07-07 Thread Martin Bagge / brother
severity: critical package: grub2 I am not sure but I do think I did a dist-upgrade in sid and installd grub2 to replace the old solution. I haven't used the computer for some days now but it can not boot anymore. Right after "Welcome to grub!" it drops to the grub rescue prompt. I can list m

Bug#570896: Please test resolvconf 1.46

2010-07-07 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 13:28:50 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > > Help, I am getting these messages [...] > > Hi. > > I have prepared a release candidate for resolvconf 1.46 which > addresses this issue. The version number is currently (in svn > revision 145) set to 1.46~4. Can you please check o

Bug#583060: marked as done (pyecm: FTBFS: dpkg-gencontrol: error: the Recommends field contains an arch-specific dependency but the package is architecture all)

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jul 2010 17:17:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#583060: fixed in pyecm 2.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #583060, regarding pyecm: FTBFS: dpkg-gencontrol: error: the Recommends field contains an arch-specific dependency but the package is architecture

Bug#588150: cups no longer works with http: HTTP/1.1 426 Upgrade Required + server DoS

2010-07-07 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Package: libcups2 Severity: grave Hi, I can confirm the issue as well as the workaround (downgrade libcups2 to 1.4.3-1). Greetings Hannes -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental') Architec

Bug#588348: offlineimap: Looses mails if PYTHONOPTIMIZE is set

2010-07-07 Thread Sascha Silbe
Package: offlineimap Version: 6.2.0.2 Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss offlineimap calls critical code paths only via assert. If PYTHONOPTIMIZE is set, python will - besides other optimisations - ignore all assert statements. In combination, this caused my entire "sent"

Bug#588316: [Evolution] Bug#588316: Large file support breaks Evolution

2010-07-07 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mit, 2010-07-07 at 14:41 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On 07/07/2010 14:31, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > What was the reason for adding --enable-largefile? Shouldn't we wait > > until upstream enables it by default? > > The fact that 32 bit users might come to the 2/4 GB limit. I'm asking

Processed: your mail

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 588330 + upstream Bug #588330 [libapache2-mod-bw] Critical bug Added tag(s) upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 588330: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588330 Debian Bug

Bug#588330: Fwd: Bug#588330: Critical bug

2010-07-07 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
I was hitting the  "invisible" memory leak  downloading huge video file on my site, and it really lok like the invisible bugs... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed (with 5 errors): Re: Bug#588330: Critical bug

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 588330 +moreinfo Bug #588330 [libapache2-mod-bw] Critical bug Added tag(s) moreinfo. > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > wrote: Unknown command or malformed arguments to co

Bug#588330: Critical bug

2010-07-07 Thread Sergey B Kirpichev
tag 588330 +moreinfo On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > The current package has a leak that could lead to crashing current > apache process. Please correct and upgrade a new one. Do you mean the fix - an "invisible" memory leak (v0.9) or - stupid bug that caused crash wh

Bug#588325: marked as done (mercurial-git: completely broken with Mercurial 1.6)

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:42:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#588325: fixed in hg-git 0.2.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #588325, regarding mercurial-git: completely broken with Mercurial 1.6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#588316: [Evolution] Bug#588316: Large file support breaks Evolution

2010-07-07 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On 07/07/2010 14:31, Michel Dänzer wrote: > What was the reason for adding --enable-largefile? Shouldn't we wait > until upstream enables it by default? > Btw, LFS is a release goal since at least etch. -- Yves-Alexis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a s

Bug#588316: [Evolution] Bug#588316: Large file support breaks Evolution

2010-07-07 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On 07/07/2010 14:31, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Mit, 2010-07-07 at 13:54 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: >> On 07/07/2010 12:21, Michel Dänzer wrote: >>> >>> Overall, I think building evolution-data-server with --enable-largefile >>> incurs >>> too much risk for Evolution users at this point. Unle

Processed: limit source to capisuite, tagging 529340, tagging 587642

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #capisuite (0.4.5-12) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > # > # * Depend on default-mta rather than exim4 (closes: #529340). Thanks to Nick > #Ellery for the bug report. > # * Fix the cleanup-after-pycentral preinst snippet (closes: #587642). > # > li

Processed: tagging 588272

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 588272 pending Bug #588272 [xfce4-notifyd] xfce4-notify doesn't support notification specs 1.1 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 588272: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr

Processed (with 1 errors): Fixed upstream

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 588330 + Upstream Unknown tag/s: Upstream. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstre

Bug#588330: Download link

2010-07-07 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Download link here : http://apache.ivn.cl/files/source/mod_bw-0.91.tgz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#588316: [Evolution] Bug#588316: Large file support breaks Evolution

2010-07-07 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mit, 2010-07-07 at 13:54 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On 07/07/2010 12:21, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > Overall, I think building evolution-data-server with --enable-largefile > > incurs > > too much risk for Evolution users at this point. Unless there was a very > > compelling reason fo

Bug#588330: Critical bug

2010-07-07 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
package: libapache2-mod-bw severity: serious Tags: security The current package has a leak that could lead to crashing current apache process. Please correct and upgrade a new one. Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr

Bug#588316: [Evolution] Bug#588316: Large file support breaks Evolution

2010-07-07 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On 07/07/2010 12:21, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Package: evolution-data-server > Version: 2.30.2-1 > Severity: grave > > > [ Severity grave to make sure this will be considered before the release ] Wtf? If you want this considered, please give some help/time, raising severity for the sake of raising

Processed: your mail

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 588325 + pending Bug #588325 [mercurial-git] mercurial-git: completely broken with Mercurial 1.6 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 588325: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug

Bug#570896: Please test resolvconf 1.46

2010-07-07 Thread Thomas Hood
> Help, I am getting these messages [...] Hi. I have prepared a release candidate for resolvconf 1.46 which addresses this issue. The version number is currently (in svn revision 145) set to 1.46~4. Can you please check out, build and install this version and report your results back here?

Bug#588107: marked as done (speech-dispatcher: FTBFS if only python-minimal is installed)

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jul 2010 11:32:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#588107: fixed in speech-dispatcher 0.7-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #588107, regarding speech-dispatcher: FTBFS if only python-minimal is installed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#588325: mercurial-git: completely broken with Mercurial 1.6

2010-07-07 Thread Jakub Wilk
Package: mercurial-git Version: 0.2.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable $ hg push pushing to https://foobar.example.net/ ** unknown exception encountered, details follow ** report bug details to http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/ ** or mercur...@selenic.com ** Python 2.6.5+

Bug#583472: marked as done (enna: FTBFS: autoreconf: failed to run autopoint: No such file or directory)

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jul 2010 10:47:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#583472: fixed in enna 0.4.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #583472, regarding enna: FTBFS: autoreconf: failed to run autopoint: No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#588316: Large file support breaks Evolution

2010-07-07 Thread Michel Dänzer
Package: evolution-data-server Version: 2.30.2-1 Severity: grave -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [ Severity grave to make sure this will be considered before the release ] Evolution bugs #580419 and #585921 are examples of issues that were triggered by building evolution-data-serv

Bug#586793: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#586793: piuparts must deal with changing symlinks in /etc/rcX.d/

2010-07-07 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2010-07-07 11:52, Holger Levsen wrote: > Have you tested this code? Does it work for you? Of course :-) > 1m34.3s DEBUG: File was renamed: /etc/rc0.d/K01hwclock.sh => > /etc/rc0.d/K02hwclock.sh > 1m34.3s DEBUG: File was renamed: /etc/rc0.d/K04umountroot => > /etc/rc0.d/K05umountr

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: cups no longer works with http: HTTP/1.1 426 Upgrade Required + server DoS

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 588150 cups/1.4.4-1 Bug #588150 [libcups2] cups no longer works with http: HTTP/1.1 426 Upgrade Required + server DoS Bug Marked as found in versions cups/1.4.4-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance

Processed: reassign 588205 to libnotify1, forcibly merging 588276 588205

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 588205 libnotify1 Bug #588205 [wicd-gtk] client throws exception with libnotify 0.5.0 Bug reassigned from package 'wicd-gtk' to 'libnotify1'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions wicd/1.7.0+ds1-5. > forcemerge 588276 588205 Bug#58827

Bug#586793: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#586793: piuparts must deal with changing symlinks in /etc/rcX.d/

2010-07-07 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Andreas, thanks for working on piuparts! On Mittwoch, 7. Juli 2010, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > This is my first attempt ever to hack python code, so there will be a > better solution of what I did. But you get the ideas. > > (Sorry, not a real .diff, but there are more modifications I'll have t

Processed: severity of 570896 is serious

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 570896 serious Bug #570896 [resolvconf] add /etc/dhcp/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/resolvconf ? Bug #583991 [resolvconf] isc-dhcp-client uses different location for hooks Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' Severity set to 'serious' from '

Processed: Re: piuparts must deal with changing symlinks in /etc/rcX.d/

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 586793 + patch Bug #586793 [piuparts] piuparts must deal with changing symlinks in /etc/rcX.d/ Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 586793: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep

Bug#586793: piuparts must deal with changing symlinks in /etc/rcX.d/

2010-07-07 Thread Andreas Beckmann
tags 586793 + patch thanks On Tuesday, 22. June 2010 18:14:39 Holger Levsen wrote: > Currently I still wonder whether there is any other viable solution for > piuparts other to ignore changes in /etc/rcX.d/ from now on :/ Which would be very bad because piuparts should detect changes (e.g. forgot

Processed: Re: cups no longer works with http: HTTP/1.1 426 Upgrade Required + server DoS

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 588150 libcups2 Bug #588150 [cups-client] cups no longer works with http: HTTP/1.1 426 Upgrade Required + server DoS Bug reassigned from package 'cups-client' to 'libcups2'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions cups/1.4.4-1. > thank

Bug#588150: cups no longer works with http: HTTP/1.1 426 Upgrade Required + server DoS

2010-07-07 Thread Vincent Lefevre
reassign 588150 libcups2 thanks On 2010-07-05 17:02:30 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > reassign 588150 cups-client > thanks > > I think it should be cups-client... It is in libcups2, since if I upgrade all the cups packages except libcups2 and cups, the problem doesn't occur. It occurs as soon a

Processed: severity of 587656 is normal

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 587656 normal Bug #587656 [acpid] acpid 1:2.0.6-1 bug report Severity set to 'normal' from 'critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 587656: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?

Processed: reassign 588227 to gthumb-data, forcibly merging 588227 588292

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 588227 gthumb-data Bug #588227 {Done: David Paleino } [gthumb-data,kipi-plugins-common] File conflict with kipi-plugins-common Bug reassigned from package 'gthumb-data,kipi-plugins-common' to 'gthumb-data'. Bug No longer marked as found

Bug#583441: marked as done (monodevelop-boo: FTBFS: Fatal error: Cannot find assembly)

2010-07-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 7 Jul 2010 10:06:44 +0300 with message-id <20100707070644.ga10...@xanadu.blop.info> and subject line Re: [unreproducible]: monodevelop-boo: FTBFS: Fatal error: Cannot find assembly has caused the Debian Bug report #583441, regarding monodevelop-boo: FTBFS: Fatal error: Cann