Bug#586037: executes a tight non-blocking loop.

Hello Julien, If your version is 100% compatible with the current netsed (but less buggy :-) ), than we can move swiftly and replace it. On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Julien Viard de Galbert wrote: > Hi again, > > Just tried your testcase with netsed and my modified version. > > And while I

Bug#538822: Bug #538822

do you has tried to reinstall bash? perhaps force reinstall? On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Brian Morris wrote: > I have got this thing bad, it blocked my upgrades completely in sid, I > tried to remove dash and i got bash removed instead, i got into a > chroot via rescue mode with the installe

Bug#586388: executables built with libc6-dev 2.11.1-3 segfault in string handling functions

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:55:52PM -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote: > After upgrading from libc6-dev 2.10.2-9 to 2.11.1-3, executables built > with libc6-dev segfault on startup. gdb says that the segfault happens > in string functions such as strrchr or strlen. The executables build > without error.

Bug#538822: Bug #538822

I have got this thing bad, it blocked my upgrades completely in sid, I tried to remove dash and i got bash removed instead, i got into a chroot via rescue mode with the installer and with placing emergency copies of the files from the bash deb onto my system. however I am stumped what to do to work

Bug#576250: febootstrap: segfaults and fails to complete bootstrapping

Hello Fabo, On Thursday 17 Jun 2010 14:15:02 Fathi Boudra wrote: > IMHO, the bug should be downgraded to important. > As I said in a previous mail: the boostrap is functional. You can > chroot and use it as expected. I don't recollect now but there were issues with the half baked chroot environm

Bug#573954: marked as done (gcc docs still default to gcc-4.3)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2010 07:46:24 +0200 with message-id <877hlva827@turtle.gmx.de> and subject line Fixed in version 5:3 has caused the Debian Bug report #573954, regarding gcc docs still default to gcc-4.3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#580496: marked as done (Apparently depends on nonexistent gcc-4.4-doc)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2010 09:09:11 +0400 with message-id <201006190909.18...@blacky.localdomain> and subject line gcc-4.4-doc is already in archive has caused the Debian Bug report #580496, regarding Apparently depends on nonexistent gcc-4.4-doc to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#586389: service-discovery-applet crashes immediately

Package: service-discovery-applet Version: 0.4.4-4.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable service-discovery-applet crashes immediately, when I log and when gnome-panel reloads it. Running it in a terminal ends with the following: Browsing for services of type '_ftp._tcp' in dom

Bug#583981: marked as done (ypsilon: Terminates with Illegal instruction)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2010 03:34:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#583981: fixed in ypsilon 0.9.6.update3-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #583981, regarding ypsilon: Terminates with Illegal instruction to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#586385: marked as done (packages is not binNMU safe)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2010 03:33:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#586385: fixed in hplip 3.10.5-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #586385, regarding packages is not binNMU safe to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#586388: executables built with libc6-dev 2.11.1-3 segfault in string handling functions

Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.11.1-3 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software After upgrading from libc6-dev 2.10.2-9 to 2.11.1-3, executables built with libc6-dev segfault on startup. gdb says that the segfault happens in string functions such as strrchr or strlen. The execu

Bug#586377: marked as done (grub-pc: Misalligned pointer when booting)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2010 01:34:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#586143: fixed in grub2 1.98+20100617-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #586143, regarding grub-pc: Misalligned pointer when booting to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#586187: marked as done (error: the symbol `grub_fs_list' not found)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2010 01:34:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#586143: fixed in grub2 1.98+20100617-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #586143, regarding error: the symbol `grub_fs_list' not found to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#586143: marked as done (Doesn't boot: Unaligned pointer 4c191bea)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2010 01:34:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#586143: fixed in grub2 1.98+20100617-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #586143, regarding Doesn't boot: Unaligned pointer 4c191bea to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#585068: marked as done (grub-pc: fails to boot kfreebsd with "no such partition" after upgrade from 1.98-1)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2010 01:34:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#585068: fixed in grub2 1.98+20100617-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #585068, regarding grub-pc: fails to boot kfreebsd with "no such partition" after upgrade from 1.98-1 to be marked as done. This means t

Bug#558747: marked as done (please produce a grub.cfg that can be used by payload from lenny)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2010 01:34:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#557425: fixed in grub2 1.98+20100617-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #557425, regarding please produce a grub.cfg that can be used by payload from lenny to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#557425: marked as done (lenny->squeeze upgrade, debconf defaults -> system unbootable)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2010 01:34:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#557425: fixed in grub2 1.98+20100617-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #557425, regarding lenny->squeeze upgrade, debconf defaults -> system unbootable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#550477: marked as done (grub-pc: after update-from-grub-legacy the system stopped booting)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2010 01:34:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#550477: fixed in grub2 1.98+20100617-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #550477, regarding grub-pc: after update-from-grub-legacy the system stopped booting to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#547944: marked as done (grub-pc: upgrade-from-grub-legacy option to install in a given hard disk is tricky)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jun 2010 01:34:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#547944: fixed in grub2 1.98+20100617-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #547944, regarding grub-pc: upgrade-from-grub-legacy option to install in a given hard disk is tricky to be marked as done. This means t

Bug#586385: packages is not binNMU safe

Package: hplip Version: 3.10.5-2 Severity: serious Hi, the latest round of binNMUs shows that hplip is not binNMU safe and because of that currently not installable in unstable (thus severity serious). hplip (arch:any) has a dependeny on hplip-data (arch:all). In such a case, binary:Version must

Bug#586037: executes a tight non-blocking loop.

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:14:26PM +0100, Tim Retout wrote: > On 18 June 2010 23:10, Julien Viard de Galbert > wrote: > > Hi again, > > > > Just tried your testcase with netsed and my modified version. > > > > And while I could reproduice the heavy cpu load with original netsed, my > > version i

Processed: tagging 585068

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 585068 pending Bug #585068 [grub-pc] grub-pc: fails to boot kfreebsd with "no such partition" after upgrade from 1.98-1 Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stop

Processed: tagging 547944, tagging 557425

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 547944 pending Bug #547944 [grub-pc] grub-pc: upgrade-from-grub-legacy option to install in a given hard disk is tricky Added tag(s) pending. > tags 557425 pending

Bug#586377: grub-pc: Misalligned pointer when booting

On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:50:41AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 01:23:16AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > Package: grub-pc > > Version: 1.98+20100614-2 > > Severity: grave > > > > Hi, > > > > I've upgraded from 1.98+20100602-2 to 1.98+20100614-2 yesterday. > > And when I tr

Processed: forcibly merging 586143 586377

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 586143 586377 Bug#586143: Doesn't boot: Unaligned pointer 4c191bea Bug#586377: grub-pc: Misalligned pointer when booting Bug#586187: error: the symbol `grub_fs_list' not found Forcibly Merged 586143 586187 586377. > thanks Stopping pro

Processed: Re: Bug#586187: error: the symbol `grub_fs_list' not found

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 586143 586187 Bug#586143: Doesn't boot: Unaligned pointer 4c191bea Bug#586187: error: the symbol `grub_fs_list' not found Forcibly Merged 586143 586187. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#585757: libglewmx1.5: 1.5.4-1 makes libglc0 crash

Well, since the problem is somewhere in Quesoglc, I built a version of glc with debug symbols, to see where exactly the error is. And surprise, that version worked. The locally rebuilt package without debug symbols also works. Not sure what exactly is the problem, maybe libglc0 was built on a syste

Processed: Re: Bug#586380: update-grub generates root=/dev/hda1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 583271 grub-common Bug #583271 [grub-pc] grub-pc: squeeze install gives broken device.map rendering grub-install useless Bug reassigned from package 'grub-pc' to 'grub-common'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions grub2/1.98-1. > re

Bug#586380: update-grub generates root=/dev/hda1

reassign 583271 grub-common reassign 586380 grub-common forcemerge 583271 585177 586380 thanks On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 01:37:51AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Package: grub-pc > Version: 1.98+20100614-2 > Severity: serious > > I had to boot from a rescue CD with an older kernel and chrooted > into

Bug#586377: grub-pc: Misalligned pointer when booting

On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 01:23:16AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Package: grub-pc > Version: 1.98+20100614-2 > Severity: grave > > Hi, > > I've upgraded from 1.98+20100602-2 to 1.98+20100614-2 yesterday. > And when I tried to boot today I got message about a misaligned > pointer before getting in t

Bug#586380: update-grub generates root=/dev/hda1

Package: grub-pc Version: 1.98+20100614-2 Severity: serious I had to boot from a rescue CD with an older kernel and chrooted into my /, which is /dev/hda1 for that kernel. I ran update-grub and isntall-grub. I then rebooted and it passed "root=/dev/hda1" to the kernel. But the new kernel calls

Bug#586143: Doesn't boot: Unaligned pointer 4c191bea

On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 01:07:06AM +0200, Andreas Jacob wrote: > Could it be that grub-install, or your patched debug version did > remove the stage2 file? When I execute a grub-install, it seems to > touch or to rewrite almost all files under /boot/grub. May be it also > deletes the stage2 file?

Bug#586377: grub-pc: Misalligned pointer when booting

Package: grub-pc Version: 1.98+20100614-2 Severity: grave Hi, I've upgraded from 1.98+20100602-2 to 1.98+20100614-2 yesterday. And when I tried to boot today I got message about a misaligned pointer before getting in the menu. I couldn't do anything. After running install-grub things were fixed

Bug#562945: Bug#582755: Bug#562945: fails to install

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:38:11 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Personally, I don't think runit-run's behavior here is what's intended to be > allowed under Policy. I agree. The current behavior in the case where the question is answered "yes" seems completely inadequate, and the mere presence of th

Bug#586143: Doesn't boot: Unaligned pointer 4c191bea

Hi Colin Could it be that grub-install, or your patched debug version did remove the stage2 file? When I execute a grub-install, it seems to touch or to rewrite almost all files under /boot/grub. May be it also deletes the stage2 file? Unfortunately i have no backup from /boot where i can look if

Bug#586143: OT

Hi Torsten, > Datum: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 00:23:17 +0200 > Von: Torsten Werner > Am 18.06.2010 21:42, schrieb "Steffen Möller": > > this grub version needs to be removed immediately from unstable. > > just purge the grub2 related binary packages from your system if you do > not like them. :) :) >

Processed: limit source to kdebase-workspace, tagging 584905, tagging 585174

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #kdebase-workspace (4:4.4.4-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > # > # * Do not hardcode python version in plasma-scriptengine-python.install > #(Closes: #585174). > # * Add patch 01_plasma_netbook_no_autostart.diff from kubuntu > #to fix plasma

Bug#586143: And where do I now get a 64bit DSL rescue disk?

Hi, Am 18.06.2010 21:42, schrieb "Steffen Möller": > this grub version needs to be removed immediately from unstable. just purge the grub2 related binary packages from your system if you do not like them. :) Removing a package from unstable would remove it from testing too because testing tracks

Bug#585174: Patch

tags 585174 + patch thanks Trivial Patch attached SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ H: +27 21 465 6908 C: +27 72 419 8559 UCT: x3127 diff -Nru kdebase-workspace-4.4.4/debian/plasma-scriptengine-python.install kdebase-workspace-4.4.4/debian/plasma-scriptengine-python.install --

Processed: Patch

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 585174 + patch Bug #585174 [kdebase-workspace] [kdebase-workspace] FTBFS with python-2.6 Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 585174: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg

Bug#586037: executes a tight non-blocking loop.

On 18 June 2010 23:10, Julien Viard de Galbert wrote: > Hi again, > > Just tried your testcase with netsed and my modified version. > > And while I could reproduice the heavy cpu load with original netsed, my > version is not impacted. This is good. Could you provide a link to your version, so w

Processed: Here's patch

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 586197 + patch Bug #586197 [src:ensymble] ensymble: doesn't work with Python 2.6: TypeError: import_module() takes at most 5 arguments (6 given) Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance

Bug#586197: Here's patch

tags 586197 + patch thanks Ick, this patch makes me feel dirty. You *really* want to package that new version, using distutils :) SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ H: +27 21 465 6908 C: +27 72 419 8559 UCT: x3127 diff -u ensymble-0.28/debian/changelog ensymble-0.28/debian/chan

Bug#586037: executes a tight non-blocking loop.

Hi again, Just tried your testcase with netsed and my modified version. And while I could reproduice the heavy cpu load with original netsed, my version is not impacted. Best regards Julien VdG -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubsc

Bug#586287: marked as done (libzorpll: FTBFS on all architectures (dist=unstable))

status 2 | |Build finished at 20100618-0041 |FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] [0] https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=libzorpll Sebastian -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10

Bug#586037: executes a tight non-blocking loop.

Package: netsed Severity: normal Hi there, I have a forked version of netsed on my blog, that I wrote 4 years ago... I did rewrite most waiting to use 'select' so even if I don't remember seeing that particular point it might be fixed (or fixable), I will check it. As for #230406 regarding UDP

Bug#586143: And where do I now get a 64bit DSL rescue disk?

>> this grub version needs to be removed immediately from unstable. It >> discourages enormously the use of unstable to filter for testing. Oh sre. > No. I'll be fixing it very soon (as soon as I get a few hours in a row > where I can concentrate on it); removing it would make it very dif

Processed: Re: Bug#577426: More crashes

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 577426 serious Bug #577426 [xt] xtraceroute ends with a segfault Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 577426: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor

Bug#584824: ntop and logcheck-database: error when trying to install together

Hi logcheck maintainer(s) So which one should change here. You or I :-) Best regards, // Ola On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 12:06:50AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Package: logcheck-database,ntop > Version: logcheck-database/1.3.9 > Version: ntop/3:3.3-13 > Severity: serious > User: trei...@debian.org

Processed: tagging 550477

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 550477 pending Bug #550477 [grub-pc] grub-pc: after update-from-grub-legacy the system stopped booting Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing h

Bug#586143: And where do I now get a 64bit DSL rescue disk?

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 09:42:29PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > this grub version needs to be removed immediately from unstable. It > discourages enormously the use of unstable to filter for testing. No. I'll be fixing it very soon (as soon as I get a few hours in a row where I can concentrat

Bug#505609: loader varialbe in kernel maintainer scripts

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:51:11 -0400 (EDT), maximilian attems wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:55:35AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote: >> As for "update-initramfs -u", it *will* invoke lilo if lilo is installed >> and "do_bootloader = yes" is specified in /etc/kernel-img.conf, which I >> highly recom

Bug#586143: Doesn't boot: Unaligned pointer 4c191bea

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 09:49:57PM +0200, mahashakti89 wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 Colin Watson wrote : >> Could you please confirm whether or not you have a file >> /boot/grub/stage2 on your system? > > A LONG TIME AGO I purged the boot directory from all stage files > belonging to the old GRUB

Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Fri Jun 18 20:03:09 UTC 2010 > # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW > # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > # > # Source package in NEW: plasma-widget-networkmanagement > tags 584360 + pending Bug #584360 [src:plasma-

Bug#586143: Doesn't boot: Unaligned pointer 4c191bea

Sorry for the second post , my first message could be ambiguous, so ... On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 Colin Watson wrote : Could you please confirm whether or not you have a file /boot/grub/stage2 on your system? A LONG TIME AGO I purged the boot directory from all stage files belonging to the old G

Bug#586143: And where do I now get a 64bit DSL rescue disk?

Hello, this grub version needs to be removed immediately from unstable. It discourages enormously the use of unstable to filter for testing. The /boot/grub/stage/stage2 and stage1 files are existing on my system. Maybe I was too happy with unstable for too long and have given my 64bit res

Bug#586143: Doesn't boot: Unaligned pointer 4c191bea

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 Colin Watson wrote : Could you please confirm whether or not you have a file /boot/grub/stage2 on your system? I purged the boot directory from all stage files belonging to the old GRUB package. There is now no such file (stage2) on my system. Regards mahashakti89

Bug#562945: Bug#582755: Bug#562945: fails to install

Hi, btw, thank you all (tech-ctte) for helping in resolving this! Much appreciated. On Freitag, 18. Juni 2010, Steve Langasek wrote: > Personally, I don't think runit-run's behavior here is what's intended to > be allowed under Policy. IMHO, if the question is "do you want to install > this pac

Bug#539096: Patch for the default python version

He's an improved patch that builds against the current Debian Python default version. Adam: Python 2.6 is now the default in sid, you might as well make teh change. SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ H: +27 21 465 6908 C: +27 72 419 8559 UCT: x3127 diff -Nru elmerfem-5.5.0.svn.

Processed: RE: I had a shot, gave up

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 570573 + patch Bug #570573 [viewvc] viewvc: XS-P-V: current and Python 2.6 as default Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 570573: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu

Processed: I had a shot, gave up

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 571545 - patch Bug #571545 [src:pylucene] pylucene: FTBFS with Python 2.6 as default Removed tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 571545: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b

Bug#571545: I had a shot, gave up

tag 571545 - patch thanks Looks like python + java packages need rpath (see http://bugs.debian.org/562622) Also Sandro's NMU patch results in installation to python2.6/site-packages. Adding a dh_pysupport call cleans it up, but the package still doesn't work: | >>> import lucene | Traceback (mos

Bug#570573: I had a shot, gave up

tag 570573 + patch thanks EEK. Wrong bug. Sorry, SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ H: +27 21 465 6908 C: +27 72 419 8559 UCT: x3127 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: I had a shot, gave up

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 570573 - patch Bug #570573 [viewvc] viewvc: XS-P-V: current and Python 2.6 as default Removed tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 570573: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?

Bug#570573: I had a shot, gave up

tag 570573 - patch thanks Looks like python + java packages need rpath (see http://bugs.debian.org/562622) Also Sandro's NMU patch results in installation to python2.6/site-packages. Adding a dh_pysupport call cleans it up, but the package still doesn't work: | >>> import lucene | Traceback (mos

Bug#586143: Doesn't boot: Unaligned pointer 4c191bea

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 08:48:06PM +0200, mahashakti89 wrote: > I can confirm the bug, on a desktop machine I was unable to boot - it > worked on a laptop -on the desktop I had to chroot the system and to downgrade > grub-pc and grub-common. I decided to find some informations on the bug, read > a

Bug#586143: Doesn't boot: Unaligned pointer 4c191bea

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 02:31:44PM +0200, Andreas Jacob wrote: > Nope, the file /boot/grub/stage2 is actually (system works) not > present in the given directory, or elsewhere under /boot. In that case, I think you have some different problem, since the other respondents on this bug (including the

Bug#586143: Doesn't boot: Unaligned pointer 4c191bea

Hi! I can confirm the bug, on a desktop machine I was unable to boot - it worked on a laptop -on the desktop I had to chroot the system and to downgrade grub-pc and grub-common. I decided to find some informations on the bug, read all the messages on bugs.debian.org concerning this one,and abou

Bug#586143: Same problem

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 01:10:42PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 01:59:15PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > I'm not the original reporter but experience the similar problem, > > getting 'unaligned pointer 0x4c1b0297'. I tried to collect the > > information you requeste

Bug#562945: Bug#582755: Bug#562945: fails to install

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:29:42PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > reassign 562945 tech-ctte > # unmerge 506898 224509 > # policy-maintainers, I think you should do this ^ > thanks > for those coming late to the party: this bug is about a package which fails > to > install cleanly: > Unpacking r

Bug#585408: Disabling flash player

Dear all, (please cc) I have seen the CVE, I have seen you rresponse, but I consider that the wrong approach. You should ship the flash plugin but disable it, and provide a way to enable it in the README file. THe way it is currently handled is a real pain. Best wishes Norbert -

Bug#585757: libglewmx1.5: 1.5.4-1 makes libglc0 crash

On Tuesday 15 June 2010 19:15:38 Christian Ohm wrote: > On Tuesday, 15 June 2010 at 19:02, Joost Yervante Damad wrote: > > Could you try and see if it is an issue with glewmx 1.5.3-3 or glewmsx > > 1.5.3-2 ? > > libglewmx1.5 1.5.3-3 also works, just 1.5.4-1 breaks things... Okay, I've given this

Bug#586351: openturns: FTBFS with Python 2.6: Could not link test program to Python.

Source: openturns Version: 0.13.2-4 Severity: serious User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python2.6 Tags: patch Justification: FTBFS Hello, openturns fails to build from source. The relevant bits of the build log: […] | checking for python... /usr/bin/python | checking for python ver

Bug#562945: Bug#582755: Bug#562945: fails to install

Holger Levsen writes: > Ah, thanks. You didnt quote the following sentence though: > "However, this situation should be avoided if at all possible, since it > prevents automated or unattended installs. In most cases, users will > consider this to be a bug in the package." > which is exactly my

Bug#586197: ensymble: doesn't work with Python 2.6: TypeError: import_module() takes at most 5 arguments (6 given)

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:55:06AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Even when rebuild with Python 2.6 as the default version, ensyble > doesn't work with 2.6: >From a quick look at upstream, a new version is out which claims 2.6 support. I will look at this, but I'm not sure how quickly as I have a la

Bug#586349: gwp - FTBFS: cannot find -lssl, undistributable or incorrect copyright file

Source: gwp Version: 0.4.0-1.2+b2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.60.0 (23 Feb 2010) on lxdebian.bfinv.de [...] > s390-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wunused -Wswitch -Wcomment > -Wuninitialized -Wparentheses

Processed: limit source to libsysactivity, tagging 586342

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #libsysactivity (0.5.3+cvs20100613-1) unstable; urgency=low > # > # * New upstream release. > #- Pulled from CVS to deal with some non-DFSG compatible licenses. > #(Closes: #586342) > # > limit source libsysactivity Limiting to bugs with

Bug#584932: marked as done (CVE-2010-1938)

Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:10:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#584932: fixed in opie 2.32.dfsg.1-0.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #584932, regarding CVE-2010-1938 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#586346: tomoe: FTBFS with Python 2.6: cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp//usr/lib/python2.5/': No such file or directory

Source: tomoe Version: 0.6.0-1 Severity: serious User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python2.6 Tags: patch Justification: FTBFS Hello, tomoe fails to build from source. The relevant bits of the build log: […] | checking for python... /usr/bin/python | checking for python version... 2

Bug#584651: marked as done (libkde4-ruby1.8 missing dependency on libqt4-ruby1.8)

Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:04:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#584651: fixed in kdebindings 4:4.4.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #584651, regarding libkde4-ruby1.8 missing dependency on libqt4-ruby1.8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#505609: loader varialbe in kernel maintainer scripts

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:55:35AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote: > > So far, Ben has only agreed to reinstate the historic function of > >do_bootloader = yes > > in /etc/kernel-img.conf for Lenny kernel maintainer scripts. > It hasn't actually happened yet, but > he has agreed to restore its

Bug#586342: libsysactivity: Contains non-DFSG compliant code.

Package: libsysactivity Version: 0.5.2-1 Severity: serious src/*BSD/cpu.c * This program may be freely redistributed, * but this entire comment MUST remain intact. Does not explicitly allow modification. The parts under this license was found under the BSD license (from the same author) an

Bug#585921: [Evolution] Bug#585921: evolution: Evolution unusable after upgrading to 2.30 due to reliable segfaults

On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 07:00 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: Thanks for the report. As said upstream, I'm not sure if it's related to > largefile support, and even if it is, it should be fixed, not disabled > (thought disabling might be a temporary workaround). In case you didn't notice the comment

Bug#505609: loader varialbe in kernel maintainer scripts

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 04:25:38 -0400 (EDT), Joachim Wiedorn wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote on 2010-06-18 02:02: >> On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 20:37 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote: >>> And how would one go about setting this "loader" variable? >>> The "loader" variable is not documented in the man page for >>>

Bug#586143: /boot/grub/stage2 and work-around

These informations in addition: # df | grep custom /dev/sdb2 24034944 2740660 20073344 13% /mnt/custom # mount | tail -3 /dev/sdb2 on /mnt/custom type ext4 (rw) /proc on /mnt/custom/proc type none (rw,bind) /dev on /mnt/custom/dev type none (rw,bind) >From my testing: --- MOUNTS

Bug#586143: /boot/grub/stage2 and work-around

Hi Dominique, I tried to reproduce on how to fix the problem: You have a little typo, here are the correct steps: 1. boot systemrescuecd 2. mount -t ext3 /dev/sda2 /mnt/custom <--- TYPO 3. mount --bind /proc /mnt/custom/proc 4. mount --bind /dev/ /mnt/custom/dev 5. chroot /mnt/custom bin/bash 6.

Bug#585468: jifty: license of */share/web/static/js/json.js is considered non-free

On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:09:31 +0100, Chris Butler wrote: > It seems that the API in json2.js is compatible with the current json.js in > jifty. We can probably upload a new package replacing this file with the > newer one from json.org. I've now prepared a package in svn that - removes the non-fre

Bug#582755: Incompatible with resolvconf

dnscache-run modifies /etc/resolv.conf. So do several other packages. All these packages overwrite one another's changes. That is bad. The resolvconf package was created in order to resolve this and related problems. Resolvconf allows packages to add information to the resolver configurati

Bug#586143: /boot/grub/stage2 and work-around

Hello I can confirm that I have /boot/grub/stage2 on a non-booting laptop. With system-rescuecd, I've moved stage2 in stage2.bak, but this is not enough to fix the problem. For other googlers, here's how I fixed my laptop: - boot systemrescuecd - mount -t ext3 /dev/sda2 /mnt/custom/dev - mou

Bug#585991: marked as done (initramfs-tools: package installation fails (postinst scripts?))

Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:18:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#585991: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.97 has caused the Debian Bug report #585991, regarding initramfs-tools: package installation fails (postinst scripts?) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#583700: marked as done (initramfs-tools: package upgrade fails)

Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:18:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#583695: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.97 has caused the Debian Bug report #583695, regarding initramfs-tools: package upgrade fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#583666: marked as done ([initramfs-tools] upgrade from 0.94.4 to 0.95 fails)

Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:18:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#583695: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.97 has caused the Debian Bug report #583695, regarding [initramfs-tools] upgrade from 0.94.4 to 0.95 fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#583695: marked as done (/usr/sbin/update-initramfs: line 317: 1: unbound variable)

Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:18:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#583695: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.97 has caused the Debian Bug report #583695, regarding /usr/sbin/update-initramfs: line 317: 1: unbound variable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#578458: still fails to build

On Thu, 20 May 2010 18:05:09 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > 5.230-1 still FTBFS on some architectures; and now in an earlier test > than the one I patched to get more informations :/ Actually it's probably the same test (t/19_handle.t) but we don't see any output. More frustrating info: I just

Bug#586143: Same problem

Hi On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 01:10:42PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 01:59:15PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > I'm not the original reporter but experience the similar problem, > > getting 'unaligned pointer 0x4c1b0297'. I tried to collect the > > information you requ

Bug#580106: Probably the wrong instruction set

Hi all! I had a look at the libclutter's build log, and it is built for armv5t, you're running on armv4t, so your cpu has probably some missing instructions. I think the armel port should run on armv4t hardware, so libclutter should be compiled with -march=armv4t. Best regards Marc -- To UN

Bug#586143: Doesn't boot: Unaligned pointer 4c191bea

Nope, the file /boot/grub/stage2 is actually (system works) not present in the given directory, or elsewhere under /boot. Cheers Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#586143: Same problem

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 01:59:15PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > I'm not the original reporter but experience the similar problem, > getting 'unaligned pointer 0x4c1b0297'. I tried to collect the > information you requested for that: Thanks. This is the most interesting part: > Generating

Bug#580496: Apparently depends on nonexistent gcc-4.4-doc

Vincent Lefevre wrote: I have no problems with: [..] This bug should probably be closed (or reassigned, if the problem is with some sources). Evidently someone has uploaded gcc-4.4-doc since I reported the bug l-) I agree that the bug can be closed. ttfn/rjk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Bug#586325: gnome-mag: FTBFS with Python 2.6: dh_install: gnome-mag missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python*/site-packages/colorblind/*), aborting

Source: gnome-mag Version: 1:0.16.1-1 Severity: serious User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python2.6 Tags: patch Justification: fails to build from source Hello, Your package fails to build from source: […] | checking for python version... 2.6 | checking for python platform... linux

  1   2   >