On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 07:29:57AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:16:23PM +0100, Rafael Belmonte wrote:
> > Package: iceweasel
> > Version: 3.0.3-2
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > ~/.mozilla folder has permisions: d rwx --- --- root r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 503871 495311
Bug#503871: iceweasel: ~/.mozilla folder has permision drwx-- root root
Bug#495311: iceweasel silently fails if permissions on .mozilla are wrong
Forcibly Merged 495311 503871.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
P
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 07:33:56AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 07:29:57AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:16:23PM +0100, Rafael Belmonte wrote:
> > > Package: iceweasel
> > > Version: 3.0.3-2
> > > Severity: grave
> > > Justification: renders package
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> tags 503616 + patch
> thanks
>
> Dear -release-rs,
>
> how should I push the fix for #503616? Via t-p-u or unstable + unblock
> request?
>
> Long story: only recently it has been brought to my attention #503616
> which affects an Apache module currently in testing.
>
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:16:23PM +0100, Rafael Belmonte wrote:
> Package: iceweasel
> Version: 3.0.3-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> ~/.mozilla folder has permisions: d rwx --- --- root root after first
> isntallation.
> Its owner and group is root, and only ro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 503871 xulrunner-1.9
Bug#503871: iceweasel: ~/.mozilla folder has permision drwx-- root root
Bug reassigned from package `iceweasel' to `xulrunner-1.9'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
or even better:
while "$ xscreensaver-command -exit" fails (indicating screensaver active):
sleep 5 seconds
perform pam and xscreensaver installation
restart xscreensaver daemon
which eliminates any need for user intervention.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the previous suggestion also seems like it would work pretty well.
some python-like pseudo code:
while "$ xscreensaver-command -exit" fails (indicating screensaver active):
present dialog indicating that an active xscreensaver was detected
wait for user to unlock screen and respond to di
if a sufficiently detailed note about this (and a recommendation to
disable the screensaver) is added to the release notes, then i believe
that this bug can be closed. btw, where can i review the release
notes at?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Thijs,
On 29 October 2008 at 00:31, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Here's the patch I used for my upload to testing-proposed-updates to address
| this bug in lenny aswell.
Thanks for doing that, I really appreciate it.
May I ask two questionWhat I don't understand is
i) why didn't my 2.7.
Hi Evgeni,
Audio is now able to be heard. However I now have issues in specific
applications (e.g. totem will lock-up when seeking now; pidgin will
stall occassionally) -- perhaps they might also need to be rebuilt for
this newer pulseaudio version?
Thanks,
Anand
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:43 PM,
Hi all,
just for the record, I got the list of the packages currently installed on
Michele's system, and tried to set up a similar system on a test partition:
1) I installed a minimal amd64 system on a test partition with the latest
Lenny installer.
2) I converted the list he gave me int
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> forwarded 500971 http://trac.transmissionbt.com/ticket/1305
Bug#500971: transmission: losing data and wasting bandwidth
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://tra
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:32:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#496418: fixed in r-base 2.7.1-1+lenny1
has caused the Debian Bug report #496418,
regarding The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian
packages
to be marked as done.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 503616 + patch
Bug#503616: libapache2-mod-ocamlnet: mod_netcgi_apache.so will not load
Tags were: pending
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
tags 503616 + patch
thanks
Dear -release-rs,
how should I push the fix for #503616? Via t-p-u or unstable + unblock
request?
Long story: only recently it has been brought to my attention #503616
which affects an Apache module currently in testing.
I do have a fix already, but it involves using
tags 503616 + pending
thanks
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:43:52PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> >I got a bit rusty on the rpath issue [1,2], but I do think that in
> >this case it would be acceptable.
> I agree, given that:
OK, thanks for the feedback.
FWIW, I do have the fix now, but it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 503616 + pending
Bug#503616: libapache2-mod-ocamlnet: mod_netcgi_apache.so will not load
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.5.2-1
Followup-For: Bug #500358
I've installed the xserver-xorg 1.5 and mach64 driver from experimental
and tested it with:
1) Current lenny's kernel
2) Gaudenz's patched kernel
3) etchnhalf kernel (2.6.24)
All the tests have the same negative result. Lo
Hi,
Here's the patch I used for my upload to testing-proposed-updates to address
this bug in lenny aswell.
cheers,
Thijs
diff -u r-base-2.7.1/debian/changelog r-base-2.7.1/debian/changelog
--- r-base-2.7.1/debian/changelog
+++ r-base-2.7.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+r-base (2.7.1-1+lenn
Package: fglrx-atieventsd
Version: 1:8-7-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 3.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The patched version of the authentication script we ship with the package uses
finger, without fglrx-atieventsd depending on it.
(Actually, I wrote th
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#503466: fixed in python-sptest 0.2.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #503466,
regarding python-sptest - FTBFS: python2.4: Command not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#503750: fixed in balazar3 0.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #503750,
regarding Save directory defaults to /tmp/balazar3_v0.1_saves
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Hi Niko,
* [28.10.08 21:43]:
> Here we go, this is against -2 in the archive as that's a fixed
> point. This is only lightly tested, please double-check :)
I double-checked and added db_stop before #DEBCONF# in mxallowd.postinst to
avoid hangs on the first start of mxallowd via debconf.
I hope th
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>Alternatively, we can try adding an RPATH to
>/usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_netcgi_apache.so pointing to `ocamlc
>-where`.
>
>I got a bit rusty on the rpath issue [1,2], but I do think that in
>this case it would be acceptable.
I agree, given that:
*
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.4.2-7
Followup-For: Bug #500358
Indeed, the Gaudenz's kernel helps to get rid of "INVALID MEM ALLOCATION"
messages in the log. But the final result is that last lines of log change
from:
(WW) MACH64: Mach64 in slot 1:2:0 could not be detected!
(II) UnloadMo
On 28/10/08 at 22:23 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I thought it was ironic at the moment, but actually this is so true. The
> current hppa kernel is not suitable for a stable release, and the kernel
> maintainers are not in a position where they can fix it. The sane
> conclusion may be therefore
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#489838: fixed in mm3d 1.3.7-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #489838,
regarding mm3d: FTBFS: checking Qt OpenGL... failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#489838: fixed in mm3d 1.3.7-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #489838,
regarding mm3d_1.3.7-1(sparc/unstable): configure: error: Failed to link Qt
with OpenGL support.
to be marked as do
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#490331: fixed in mm3d 1.3.7-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #490331,
regarding mm3d: FTBFS: checking Qt OpenGL... failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#490331: fixed in mm3d 1.3.7-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #490331,
regarding mm3d_1.3.7-1(sparc/unstable): configure: error: Failed to link Qt
with OpenGL support.
to be marked as do
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 01:44:01PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Dave Benjamin a écrit :
> > I installed libapache2-mod-ocamlnet and enabled the module using "a2enmod
> > netcgi_apache". Apache 2 no longer starts, printing this message instead:
>
> Replacing the last line of /etc/apache2/mods-en
Package: iceweasel
Version: 3.0.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
~/.mozilla folder has permisions: d rwx --- --- root root after first
isntallation.
Its owner and group is root, and only root has access.
Due this, only root can launch iceweasel.
Removing .mozilla folder
Gaudenz Steinlin napsal(a):
Hi Daniel
back in September you exchanged some mails with Riku Voipio
about a bug in the X server on SPARC. In order to resolve this
bug I need some further information. First of all I'm not really
sure if bug in which you participated[1] is really the same as
anoth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Aluoor schrieb:
> Package: videocut
> Version: 0.2.0-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> I capture screenshots from movie files with videocut. When working in
> the program i see all mini images (see screenshot_using
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> close 502346
Bug#502346: virtualbox-ose-modules package older than virtualbox-ose
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug#502539: virtualbox-ose-m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 502346 linux-modules-extra-2.6
Bug#502346: virtualbox-ose-modules package older than virtualbox-ose
Bug reassigned from package `virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.26-1-amd64' to
`linux-modules-extra-2.6'.
> priority 502539 serious
Bug#502539: virtua
> Either way, isn't this a bug in libnss-ldap, not ldapscripts?
It also seems to me that the bug is more on the libnss-ldap side (or maybe on
the way nscd is configured).
the description of libnss-ldap says
(http://packages.debian.org/lenny/libnss-ldap):
"If used with glibc 2.1's nscd (Name Se
Neil Williams wrote:
> The build needs --disable-x11 because --with-x=no (or --without-x which
> is equivalent) does nothing.
indeed, i was seeing that too before having left for dinner. now you
saved me the time to find the correct flag myself - very kind of you,
thanks! ;)
> I can cross-build i
Hi,
I've build and installed this package (somehow dget couldn't get around
the https, so I added --insecure -u),
but it crashes, too, with pretty the same backtrace.
I have some time, so we can go on. What's so different between a debian
package build and a standard compilation?
Benjamin
Adam
On Tuesday 28 October 2008, Neil Williams wrote:
> I don't do much with D-I so I can only think that something is wrong
> with the environment:
Problem is that the environment cannot be changed in D-I as the language
is selected using a subshell within the environment where D-I runs.
This means t
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:17:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#503836: fixed in giflib 4.1.6-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #503836,
regarding giflib: libgif4 on arm (and alpha, powerpc) incorrectly depends on
libx11 - libgif-tools contents differe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 478717 -1
Bug#478717: ruby1.9: FTBFS on hppa: make[1]: *** [all] Segmentation fault
Bug is marked as being merged with others. Use an existing clone.
> reassign -1 linux-2.6
Bug number -1 not found. (Is it archived?)
> retitle -1 [hppa] Serious
clone 478717 -1
reassign -1 linux-2.6
retitle -1 [hppa] Serious instability issues with NPTL
block 478717 by -1
thanks
While trying to reproduce the issue at hand, I only managed to make paer
(running kernel 2.6.26-1-parisc) deadlock, like what was described with
2.6.18. So, contrary to previous c
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:13:30PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:27:29AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > >
> > > I have two concerns with this:
> > > - grub-probe can possibly fail in other circumstances and we will displ
reopen 502539
merge 502539 502346
thanks
these bugs should have been merged (502539 was closed without
explanation).
live well,
vagrant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 502539
Bug#502539: virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.26-1-686 contains outdated module for
VirtualBox
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> merge 502539 502346
Bug#502346: virtualbox-ose-modules package older than virtualbox-ose
Bug#502539: virtualb
This bug has been around for 2 weeks without comment, I'm just trying
to understand what is going on.
The mechanism in the title is certainly how fallback is meant to be
activated and I can't see anything in the cdebconf C source code that
would change that.
I don't do much with D-I so I can only
X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: python-extclass
Severity: serious
Version: 1.2.0zope-2.5.1-6
python -c 'import ExtensionClass ; print ExtensionClass.ExtensionClass'
Segmentation fault
of course, there is a completely new (i.e. five instead of eight years
old...), worki
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:38:20 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#503801: josm: java bytecode / java runtime version
mismatch
has caused the Debian Bug report #503801,
regarding josm: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch
to be marked as done.
tag 502744 patch
tag 503408 patch
tag 503409 patch
thanks
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:04:45PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Michael, sorry to be the bearer of bad news. As a compensation, I've
> got a proposed patch almost ready and will send it hopefully tonight.
Here we go, this is against -2 in th
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 02:09:20 you wrote:
> It is. So I will upload a fixed package to testing-proposed-updates
Thanks Micha,
I don't think I can do this from the kmymoney2 end, so it would be good if you
can do on the plugin package.
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 05:39:20 Peter De Wachter wrote:
> But issues which "[make] the package in question unusable by most or
> all users" are severity grave. I'd argue most users (certainly most
> desktop users) don't use an English locale, as most people don't use
> English as their native
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 502744 patch
Bug#502744: mxallowd: config script fails on noninteractive installs
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> tag 503408 patch
Bug#503408: mxallowd: doesn't preserve local changes to /etc/mxallowd.conf
There were no tags set.
Tags a
Le mardi 28 octobre 2008 à 18:35 +1100, Mark Purcell a écrit :
> While I can understand your desire for non-en locales, that fact that the
> menus work in English means that this RC bug should be classified as:
>
> severity important: has a major effect on the usability of a package, without
> r
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 04:06:20 Luca Bruno wrote:
> if the release team
> really sees this as an issue needing an immediate fix, I won't object to
> the choice (and if Thiemo is already there I won't be against a quick
> NMU targeting only #500418, as I'll probably be busy in the next few
> d
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:27:29AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >
> > I have two concerns with this:
> > - grub-probe can possibly fail in other circumstances and we will display
> > a misleading error message in those cases
>
> grub-probe's messag
I'm not sure that this bug applies to ldapscripts - it is caught out by
the lack of a dependency:
> Setting up libnss-ldap (261-2) ...
> invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/nscd not found.
> dpkg: error processing libnss-ldap (--configure):
>subprocess post-installation script r
Hi everyone,
For those still experiencing crashes at Iceweasel, can you try the
following:
- Save the contents of /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9 and /usr/share/xulrunner-1.9
somewhere. It would be nice if you could send them to me, too, if the
rest of the procedure works.
- Purge xulrunner-1.9 (apt-get re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 501306 - patch
Bug#501306: update-grub fails silently with wrong device.map
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
tags 501306 - patch
thanks
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:14:59PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> tags 501306 + patch
> thanks
>
> Hello,
>
> here's the patch that I announced sooner. I tested here by changing
> device.map to not reference my /boot and / partitions. Running
> udpdate-grub still work
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:27:29AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> I have two concerns with this:
> - grub-probe can possibly fail in other circumstances and we will display
> a misleading error message in those cases
grub-probe's messages aren't always appropiate for grub legacy's update-gru
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 03:02:16PM +0100, Thomas Pietrzak wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 01:52:50PM +0100, Thomas Pietrzak <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Unfortunately, upgrading from sarge
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
I think that I would like the Debian Blend distributions (formerly called CDDs)
to manage this smartly in the future. We could have some mechanisms that make
sure that for biologists, plink relates to SNPs, not to SSH. But this is a long
term goal with
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:49:20 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line re: weka: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch
has caused the Debian Bug report #503802,
regarding weka: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch
to be marked as done.
This means
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:02:02 +0100
Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> severity 503735 grave
>
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 06:35:15PM +1100, Mark Purcell wrote:
> > On Tuesday 28 October 2008 10:05:04 Peter De Wachter wrote:
> > > Severity: grave
> > > Justification: renders package unusable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 496269 0.2.5-1.1
Bug#496269: gvfs-fuse: reports ENOTCONN after heavy use
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 0.2.5-1.1, send any further explanations to
"brian m. carlson" <[EMAI
close 496269 0.2.5-1.1
fixed 496269 0.2.5-1.1
notfound 496269 0.2.5-1.1
thanks
> the bug I reported (#502725) is indeed fixed with Clint's NMU, thanks. I
> should note that gvfs-fuse-daemon still hangs on heavy use (i.e. #496269
> is not fixed, demonstration: run my test script from #502725 on
> ~
The build needs --disable-x11 because --with-x=no (or --without-x which
is equivalent) does nothing.
./usr/bin/gif2x11 exists after using --without-x
I can cross-build in a clean chroot and not have the libx11-6 dependency
but then I lose that binary in the -tools package. That turns out to be
th
Marcus Better wrote:
> Ah, yes! I did compile it myself. Don't know how I could forget. Very
> sorry about that!
No problem at all, thanks for the heads-up! (it's the thought that
counts :) )
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Version: 0.2.5-1.1
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> reopen 496269
Bug#496269: gvfs-fuse: reports ENOTCONN after heavy use
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove
Version: 0.2.5-1.1
reopen 496269
notfixed 496269 0.2.5-1.1
found 496269 0.2.5-1.1
Hi,
the bug I reported (#502725) is indeed fixed with Clint's NMU, thanks. I
should note that gvfs-fuse-daemon still hangs on heavy use (i.e. #496269
is not fixed, demonstration: run my test script from #502725 on
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:21:48 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line good and bad news about gvfs and Clint's NMU
has caused the Debian Bug report #502725,
regarding gvfs hangs for mounts after heavy use
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Hi,
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 01:09:24 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 23:43:40 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > +
> > + p = grub_strchr (p, '}') + 1;
> > + if (p == NULL)
> > + goto pvs_fail;
> > +
>
> This test seems buggy. The +1 needs to be after t
Thiemo Seufer scrisse:
> I can do a NMU if they are short on time. (And iff the bugs remains
> flagged as RC, as Developer's Reference 5.10.2.2 recommends.)
Sorry for not replying early on this. My intention was to wait after
lenny to fix both #500418 and 485301 at once.
While the architecture d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 503836 serious
Bug#503836: giflib: libgif4 on arm (and alpha, powerpc) incorrectly depends on
libx11 - libgif-tools contents different
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> tags 503836 +pending
Bug#503836: giflib: libgif4 on arm (and a
Le Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 02:48:21PM +0100, Steffen Möller a écrit :
> a) removing the newly package plink from the archive
> b) add an exception to Debian policy for the case that the two packages
> in name-conflict are not in the base distribution and the two
> maintainers agree that the conflict
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Luca Capello wrote:
FWIW both software have been published in scientific papers, thus
changing one name or the other can be more difficult.
Yes - but it can be made public on their website.
However, while Steffen's point is valid, it's not problematic ATM, since
we don't
Hi again,
It seems libpulsecore5 should be libpulsecore8 in experimental...
However, I'd say this is not a RC bug in Lenny/Sid.
Regards
Evgeni
pgpLIqVmTGIy3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi there!
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:58:20 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Steffen Möller wrote:
>> Except that snplink is taken by another program
>
> This is a valid point and should probably be discussed with plink
> (and snplink??) authors.
FWIW both software have been publishe
Hi,
what happens when you upgrade pulseaudio to 0.9.13?
Regards
Evgeni
pgpUT0uCdtOpA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:33:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#503623: python-support: Fails during the Setting Up
step of installation
has caused the Debian Bug report #503623,
regarding python-support: Fails during the Setting Up step of installa
Josselin Mouette wrote:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8 2008-06-07 23:41
/usr/share/python-support/python-gobject/pygtk.pth
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8 2006-08-06 06:58
/usr/share/python-support/python-gtk2/pygtk.pth
The latter file is not present in the python-gtk2 package at this
version.
Hi,
Adeodato Simó schrieb:
>> So may I kindly ask: Would the release team issue a freeze-exception
>> for the following patch in Lenny (via TPU)?:
>
> Yes, though I don't think the change in Build-Depends is strictly
> needed.
It is. So I will upload a fixed package to testing-proposed-updates.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 503682 0.7.0~svn4191-1
Bug#503682: network-manager-gnome: partial upgrade do not work
Bug marked as found in version 0.7.0~svn4191-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 503682 libnm-util0
Bug#503682: network-manager-gnome: partial upgrade do not work
Bug reassigned from package `network-manager-gnome' to `libnm-util0'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 503682 0.6.6-2
Bug#503682: network-manager-gnome: partial upgrade do not work
Bug no longer marked as found in version 0.6.6-2.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Steffen Möller wrote:
Except that snplink is taken by another program
This is a valid point and should probably be discussed with plink
(and snplink??) authors.
and Debian remains incompatible for scripts shared in the community.
This is not really a valid point. In c
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:45:58 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The problem does not occur in mina
has caused the Debian Bug report #503792,
regarding mina: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Hi,
Could you please dget and build this package ?
It's based on latest svn snapshot:
https://dedibox.le-vert.net/divers/debian/aqualung/aqualung_0.9~beta9.1+svn.r1032-1.dsc
If this one works, there's definetly something between revision 1000 and
1032 that fixed your bug.
However, I read the wh
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 21:50 -0400, Eric Doviak wrote:
> Hi Luis, Tim and Yves-Alexis,
[snip]
> Because I'm curious ... What change was made that corrected Splashy's
> behavior?
Tim changed the order at which Splashy is executed during resume to
allow uswsusp to start first.
We will release 0.3.1
Your message dated Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:07:47 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The problem does not occur here either
has caused the Debian Bug report #503787,
regarding libwoodstox-java: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch
to be marked as done.
This means that
Hello,
Teodor schrieb:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Steffen Möller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Charles Plessy schrieb:
>>
>>> Le Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:32:42AM +0200, Teodor a écrit :
>>>
I still believe it is best to rename 'plink' to 'puttylink' in
putty-tool
Hi Daniel
back in September you exchanged some mails with Riku Voipio
about a bug in the X server on SPARC. In order to resolve this
bug I need some further information. First of all I'm not really
sure if bug in which you participated[1] is really the same as
another SPARC X server issue (see [
Tirsdag den 28. Oktober 2008 skrev Raphael Hertzog:
> - the installation will still fail and most users have no idea what
> device.map really is. If you go that route, you should at least give
> them the command-line to execute to regenerate the device.map
> But in the mean time for Grub 1, wo
Note: I'm not a CTTE member.
Steffen Joeris wrote:
Maintainer:
--
The problem is as follows. The submitter sees the inclusion of the
getweb script as a violation of the DFSG. The script is provided by
upstream to download non-free firmware from his upstream webpage. The
package inc
Hi,
Adam: unfortunately it still crashes with the same errors after the
build and install of the .deb file.
Mark: I fixed this through compiling the newest svn-tarball (r-1032)
from source. But the debian package is still unusable for me.
I thought that if it's related to my system only, then the
Hi Marco
In order to resolve the bug you submitted in June against
xserver-xorg because it did crash on your SPARC machine I
need your help. Could you please answer the questions I
sent you in an earlier mail this week. In case you did not
receive the mail it's attached.
In addition I have one
Quoting Martin Pala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
<.>
When i switched the Iceweasel's certificate setting:
Edit->Preferences->Advanced->Encryption->"When a server requests my
personal certificate" to "Ask me every time" i get the dialog which
reports that Monit asked for certificate and allows to
forwarded 503746 https://bugs.launchpad.net/wicd/+bug/290261
thanks
Hi,
I can confirm the bug as beeing reproducable. Additional I tested it
with the current upstream version which also suffers from the problem. I
therefore forwarded the issue to the upstream developer(s) and asked for
their opin
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
