Bug#497922: the new upstream package

Hi, so the new upstream package I was talking about is at http://people.debian.org/~tviehmann/needs-barry/ for the moment. Kind regards T. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#501755: oocalc/writer/etc won't start. unexpected token `fi' on line 367 of soffice

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 08:23:26AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Already reported a few times and pending. What if you would look in the BTS > first > before filing the fifth instance of this? i did look. didn't see anything resembling it, so submitted a bug report. craig -- craig sanders <[

Processed: severity of 500826 is normal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 500826 normal Bug#500826: zabbix: Upgrade to Zabbix 1.6 does not work out-of-the-box, SQL upgrade scripts are not included in package? Severity set to `normal' from `grave' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#501411: Took a quick look at this

Here's the relevant script section: ### Test Per Object PostLoopCallbacks socketpair(Rdr, Wtr, AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, PF_UNSPEC); my $reader = Danga::Socket->new(\*Rdr); my $writer = Danga::Socket->new(\*Wtr); print "# reader: $reader\n#

Processed: lowering severity on #482439

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 482439 important Bug#482439: cfengine2: There are still a ton of segfaults Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admini

Bug#497922: probably needs (trivial?) fix to linux-headers

Hi Barry, everyone, (apologies first: my phone company (Congstar, owned by and selling lines from Deutsche Telekom) are sitting on my unfixed DSL line, so I had to work on issues I remembered without being able to contact you) The above patch to linux-2.6 fixes the failure to build the modules. I

Processed: xfs essentially works, so this is not technically RC

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 498823 important Bug#498823: xfs: recent change from 'root' to 'nobody' perhaps requires more thought Severity set to `important' from `serious' > tag 498823 + patch Bug#498823: xfs: recent change from 'root' to 'nobody' perhaps requires more

Bug#498823: xfs essentially works, so this is not technically RC

severity 498823 important tag 498823 + patch thanks Hi, some analysis (Congstar/DTAG needs to fix my DSL line, so I had to work on stuff I remembered): 1) all of xfs essentially works. Logging via syslog does and so does pidfile-management by start-stop-daemon, 2) loggging to a file is still e

Bug#501755: oocalc/writer/etc won't start. unexpected token `fi' on line 367 of soffice

severity 501755 grave merge 501664 501755 thanks Craig Sanders wrote: > $ oocalc > javaldx failed! > /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line 367: syntax error near unexpected > token `fi' > /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line 367: `fi' > > > problem is due to mistaken use of 'fi' to ter

Processed: Re: Bug#501745: Subject: openoffice.org-writer: [1:2.4.1-10] oowriter : syntax error at oowriter : syntax erro at /openoffice/program/soffice

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 501745 openoffice.org-common Bug#501745: Subject: openoffice.org-writer: [1:2.4.1-10] oowriter : syntax error at oowriter : syntax erro at /openoffice/program/soffice Bug reassigned from package `openoffice.org-writer' to `openoffice.org-commo

Processed: Re: Bug#501755: oocalc/writer/etc won't start. unexpected token `fi' on line 367 of soffice

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 501755 grave Bug#501755: oocalc/writer/etc won't start. unexpected token `fi' on line 367 of soffice Severity set to `grave' from `normal' > merge 501664 501755 Bug#501664: openoffice.org-common: sh script syntax error prevents application

Bug#501411: Took a quick look at this

"Michael Casadevall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Taking a closer look at the FTBFS, and the code, it seems the code is > trying to open two sockets, and then send data between both of them; I > misspoke when I said the internet, and should have said network > sockets, I'm not sure if the grid co

Bug#475036: marked as done (kernel-package: kernel-package is suffering from bit rot, and is severly broken)

Your message dated Fri, 10 Oct 2008 06:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#475036: fixed in kernel-package 11.003 has caused the Debian Bug report #475036, regarding kernel-package: kernel-package is suffering from bit rot, and is severly broken to be marked as do

Bug#501411: Took a quick look at this

Taking a closer look at the FTBFS, and the code, it seems the code is trying to open two sockets, and then send data between both of them; I misspoke when I said the internet, and should have said network sockets, I'm not sure if the grid computers would prevent a socket from being opened properly,

Bug#501411: Took a quick look at this

Michael Casadevall wrote: > I took a quick look at this, its possible this FTBFS on the grid > simply because the internet isn't available. I rebuilt it a few times, > and it always passed. If it possible that this is just a random fluke, > and this bug can be closed, or at least downgraded? A pac

Bug#501411: Took a quick look at this

I took a quick look at this, its possible this FTBFS on the grid simply because the internet isn't available. I rebuilt it a few times, and it always passed. If it possible that this is just a random fluke, and this bug can be closed, or at least downgraded? Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#500320: Patch to fix

tags 500320 +patch +confirmed thankyou This FTBFS is easily fixable by adding intltool to the build-deps, and makes the package buildable on i386 and amd64. I've created an NMU, and I'll upload as a convience to you if desired: http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;pack

Bug#475036: Fix for Bug commited to version control

tags 410035 +pending tags 475036 +pending tags 446879 +pending tags 433217 +pending tags 432711 +pending tags 460507 +pending tags 480436 +pending thanks, Hi, The following change has been committed for this bug, and so the fix will be in the next upload. =

Processed (with 5 errors): Fix for Bug commited to version control

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 410035 +pending Bug#410035: kernel-package: make-kpkg clean fails: make[2]: ./debian/rules: No such file or directory Tags were: unreproducible Tags added: pending > tags 475036 +pending Bug#475036: kernel-package: kernel-package is suffering

Bug#501638: ted: license terms make the work non-free and non-redistributable

package ted retitle 501638 ted: license terms make the work non-free and non-redistributable thanks I agree that the copyright holder's conditions make the work non-free; further, the work is non-redistributable, because the recipient cannot meet the contradictory requirements of both the GPL a

Processed: ted: license terms make the work non-free and non-redistributable

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package ted Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ted > retitle 501638 ted: license terms make the work non-free and > non-redistributable Bug#501638: Ted is non-free Changed Bug title to `ted: license terms make the work non-free and non-redistributable' f

Bug#496387: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages

Georges Khaznadar wrote: > thank you for your investigation work: your script revealed some weak > points inside scripts of the package wims. I made a new package to fix > these weaknesses, and will send a message about them to the upstream > developer. > > José Luis, > please can you sponsor the

Processed: axiom: new upstream version available

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package axiom Ignoring bugs not assigned to: axiom > retitle 501616 axiom: new upstream version available Bug#501616: axiom: severly outdated (> 3 years) version packged for lenny Changed Bug title to `axiom: new upstream version available' from `axiom

Processed: #501340 is resolved by libsqlite3-0 3.5.9-5

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 501340 libsqlite3-0 Bug#501340: sqlite3 is wrong on SELECT DISTINCT a WHERE a IS NOT NULL over a TEXT UNIQUE column Bug reassigned from package `sqlite3' to `libsqlite3-0'. > severity 501340 grave Bug#501340: sqlite3 is wrong on SELECT DISTIN

Bug#501616: axiom: new upstream version available

package axiom retitle 501616 axiom: new upstream version available severity 501616 wishlist submitter 501616 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks The original submitter gave a non-transportable email address, making the submitter field useless on this bug report. Re-setting submitter to Debian QA. On 09-O

Bug#501501: python-matplotlib: same here

Package: python-matplotlib Followup-For: Bug #501501 Dear Package Maintainer, I can confirm the same bug here. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LA

Bug#476431: Bug#470882: /dev/gpmctl freezes acknowledge

Thomas Dickey, le Wed 08 Oct 2008 20:00:32 -0400, a écrit : > With the latest update, ncurses won't try to use gpm if $TERM doesn't > contain "linux", unless it's overridden (with a new environment variable). Ah, indeed. Rhonda, Zito or Simon, could you check whether upgrading your libncurses5 an

Bug#482140: Reproducible and playing machine available

Hi Daniel! I'm sorry for being late: I was hit by two bugs during the etch installation on QEMU [1][2] and free time is missing here. On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:17:24 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 07.10.2008, 09:53 +0200 schrieb Luca Capello: >> 1) IMHO this bug is Severity: importa

Bug#501574: warsow: crashes at startup (warsow_bin: shader/slang/slang_emit.c:978 ...)

Hello Debian X Strike Force. There's a bug in warsow that according to the Warsow developers, is due to a buggy driver. I can reproduce this bug with a machine using a mesa driver, but on a machine with the proprietary nvidia drivers, I can't reproduce this bug. On Wednesday 08 October 2008 04:

Bug#501538: marked as done (haxe_1:2.0.1-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: /build/buildd/haxe-2.0.1/bin/haxe: Command not found)

Your message dated Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:17:15 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#501538: fixed in haxe 1:2.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #501538, regarding haxe_1:2.0.1-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: /build/buildd/haxe-2.0.1/bin/haxe: Command not found to be marked

Bug#501306: update-grub fails with raid1 boot partition

On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 09:28:56PM +0100, Dan Poltawski wrote: > On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 09:27:51PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > It might be possible that the names sda to sdd were used for something > > that wasn't an hard disk during the install (a card reader with 4 > > different slots might

Bug#501306: update-grub fails with raid1 boot partition

On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 09:27:51PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > It might be possible that the names sda to sdd were used for something > that wasn't an hard disk during the install (a card reader with 4 > different slots might be a good candidate). Then your system would > still boot properly wit

Bug#475993: fslview: FTBFS: application.h:25:19: error: qlist.h: No such file or directory

On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 06:29:20PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Did you contact the arm porters and/or the maintainers of qt4-x11 to see > if they have ideas about why uic segfaults on arm and how to fix it? I did now. Thread starts here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-qt-kde/2008/10/msg00049.html

Bug#501721: /usr/bin/ooffice: ooffice fails to start: syntax error

merge 501721 501664 thanks On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 21:10 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > Package: openoffice.org-common > Version: 1:2.4.1-10 > Severity: grave > File: /usr/bin/ooffice > Justification: renders package unusable > > $ ooffice > /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line 367: syntax err

Processed: Re: Bug#501721: /usr/bin/ooffice: ooffice fails to start: syntax error

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 501721 501664 Bug#501664: openoffice.org-common: sh script syntax error prevents application start + bashism Bug#501721: /usr/bin/ooffice: ooffice fails to start: syntax error Bug#501667: openoffice.org-common: soffice script fails Merged 501664

Bug#501721: /usr/bin/ooffice: ooffice fails to start: syntax error

Package: openoffice.org-common Version: 1:2.4.1-10 Severity: grave File: /usr/bin/ooffice Justification: renders package unusable $ ooffice /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line 367: syntax error near unexpected token `fi' /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line 367: `fi' It looks like th

Bug#497922: gpib-modules-source: fails to compile against kernel 2.6.26

Hi, The new upstream version builds a package but module-assistant fails to build the resulting gpib-modules-source package. Building modules, stage 2. /usr/bin/make -f /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.26-1-686/scripts/Makefile.modpost make[3]: *** /tmp/gpib/usr_src/modules/gpib/agilent_82350b/: I

Bug#492212: marked as done (Does not start anymore (futex syscall))

Your message dated Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:02:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#492212: fixed in enchant 1.4.2-3.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #492212, regarding Does not start anymore (futex syscall) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#501519: marked as done (enchant crashes when closing a directory before returning a dictionary)

Your message dated Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:02:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#492212: fixed in enchant 1.4.2-3.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #492212, regarding enchant crashes when closing a directory before returning a dictionary to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#501306: update-grub fails with raid1 boot partition

On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 10:46:26AM +0100, Dan Poltawski wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 01:35:53AM -0400, Samat K Jain wrote: > > On Tuesday 07 October 2008 04:53:57 am Dan Poltawski wrote: > > > Just in response to this - my problem has not been caused by an upgrade - > > > it was a clean lenny

Processed (with 1 errors): your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 501413 +patch +fixed-in-experimental +fixed-upstream Unknown tag/s: +fixed-in-experimental, +fixed-upstream. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimenta

Bug#500794: uswsusp - s2ram does not follow kernel

Bastian Blank schreef: > On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 11:39:15PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: >> Op Sun, 5 Oct 2008 14:55:30 +0200 >> schreef Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 09:54:33AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: >> >> I looked at some numbers. We currently have +/- 400 m

Processed: reopening 499508

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > reopen 499508 Bug#499508: open-iscsi: iscsistart in lenny doesn't work with 2.6.26 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found'

Processed: tau: NMU for 2.16.4-1.2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 458874 + patch Bug#458874: tau: FTBFS: chmod: cannot access `/build/user/tau-2.16.4/debian/BUILD/usr/lib/tau/include/Profile/Tul ipThreadLayer.h': No such file or directory There were no tags set. Bug#476638: tau_2.16.4-1.1(sparc/unstable): Tags

Bug#458874: tau: NMU for 2.16.4-1.2

tags 458874 + patch thanks Please find attached NMU debdiff for 2.16.4-1.2 which should fix this FTBFS issue. Thank you. -- . ''`. Luca Falavigna : :' : Ubuntu MOTU Developer `. `'` Debian Maintainer `- GPG Key: 0x86BC2A50 diff -u tau-2.16.4/debian/changelog tau-2.16.4/debi

Bug#501617: marked as done (matplotlib in lenny FTBFS)

Your message dated Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:47:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#501617: fixed in matplotlib 0.98.1-1+lenny3 has caused the Debian Bug report #501617, regarding matplotlib in lenny FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 458874 476638 Bug#458874: tau: FTBFS: chmod: cannot access `/build/user/tau-2.16.4/debian/BUILD/usr/lib/tau/include/Profile/Tul ipThreadLayer.h': No such file or directory Bug#476638: tau_2.16.4-1.1(sparc/unstable): Merged 458874 476638. > than

Bug#499508: closed by Chris Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#499508: fixed in open-iscsi 2.0.870~rc3-0.1)

Found: 2.0.870~rc3-0.1 Am Dienstag, den 30.09.2008, 21:36 + schrieb Debian BTS: > open-iscsi (2.0.870~rc3-0.1) unstable; urgency=low > . > * Non-maintainer upload. > * New upstream release > - Adds support for Linux 2.6.26 (Closes: #499508) > * Fix ">&" redirection bashism in open-is

Bug#468793: tokyocabinet - FTBFS: pthread_mutex_lock.c:71: __pthread_mutex_lock: Assertion `mutex->__data.__owner == 0' failed.

Hi, Just a question. Does this bug stay with upstream version? As I requested #489784, Tokyo Cabinet is updated, and now released 1.3.11 at 2008-09-23 (more than 10days ago). If you could try and fixed with upstream version, users get happy, I guess... -- Regards, Hideki Yamane hen

Processed: severity of 501651 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Debian never built on LDoms AFAIK > severity 501651 important Bug#501651: debian-installer: Unable to install lenny onto a Sun logical domain Severity set to `important' from `critical' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me i

Bug#500259: Couldn't reproduce your bug filled against gmediaserver

tags 500259 -unreproducible thanks hiya, okay, here's some more information on this... the only two changes i made were: GMEDIASERVERRUN=yes GMEDIASERVERDIR="/scratch" what i failed to realize was that /scratch also holds a ccache cache dir (plus a couple cowbuilder chroots), so there are easi

Processed: Re: Bug#500259: Couldn't reproduce your bug filled against gmediaserver

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 500259 -unreproducible Bug#500259: gmediaserver: init script does not stop service Tags were: unreproducible Tags removed: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adm

Bug#500941: rdiff-backup does not function with current unstable version of encfs

severity 500941 important thanks Sorry, almost every glitch at this level has to "break unrelated software". The fact that the issue was undiscovered for 4.5 months demonstrates its severity very well. Regards, Eduard. -- Jemanden zu sagen Idiot - das ist keine Beleidigung, sondern Diagnose.

Processed: rdiff-backup does not function with current unstable version of encfs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 500941 important Bug#500941: rdiff-backup does not function with current unstable version of encfs Severity set to `important' from `critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#492970: #492970 - nfs-common 1:1.1.3-1 client disallows access to files/directories where it should allow access - Debian Bug report logs

Unfortunately, I'm failing miserably on reproducing this... Here is what I've done: Chuck Lever wrote: > Hi Steve- > > As I understand it, the documented bug refers to running nfs-utils 1.1.3 > on kernels older than 2.6.22. I created a Fedora 7 KVM guest that runs a 2.6.21 kernel. I installed t

Bug#482439: cfengine2: There are still a ton of segfaults

On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Morten Werner Forsbring wrote: They are back again (was gone due to change of server for people.debian.org). Are you able to test this package again now? cool, downloaded and installed - hopefully there is debugging info in the package... I'll do some runs and see that hap

Processed: found 493047 in 2.9.9.7-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 493047 2.9.9.7-1 Bug#493047: dansguardian: Dansguardian fails with 'basic_string::_S_construct NULL not valid" on start Bug marked as found in version 2.9.9.7-1. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistan

Processed: Re: Bug#501605: sympa: broken post-inst script

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Tags 501605 +patch Bug#501605: sympa: broken post-inst script There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#501605: sympa: broken post-inst script

Tags 501605 +patch thanks Hi, On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 03:17:43PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > Line 212 in the postinst breaks if sympa/key_password contains sed > metacharacters, for instance 'a/b/c' as above. attached is a patch for this issue. Best Regards, Patrick --- sympa-5.3.4/debian/postins

Bug#501605: sympa: broken post-inst script

Hi, On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 03:17:43PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > Line 212 in the postinst breaks if sympa/key_password contains sed > metacharacters, for instance 'a/b/c' as above. > > This looks RC to me, so upgrading back. I already had this line in suspect, but I didn't think about that. Good

Bug#500711: marked as done (kdenetwork package broken dependency OS390)

Your message dated Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:47:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#500711: fixed in kdenetwork 4:3.5.10-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #500711, regarding kdenetwork package broken dependency OS390 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#501672: marked as done (facile - FTBFS: ocamlopt: Command not found)

Your message dated Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#501672: fixed in facile 1.1-6.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #501672, regarding facile - FTBFS: ocamlopt: Command not found to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#501508: similar, but not same

Dont' cc: me, please continue at debian-legal. Dude, you are opening a can of worms here. According to openarena pages, both of these models have been created by openarena authors - thus they are not direct copies. http://openarena.wikia.com/wiki/Kyonshi http://openarena.wikia.com/wiki/Grism Th

Bug#501672: setting package to facile libfacile-ocaml-dev, tagging 501672

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.26ubuntu13 # # facile (1.1-6.3) unstable; urgency=low # # * Fix ocamlopt usage; closes: #501672. #- New dpatch, 30-non-opt-check, ocamlopt isn't available on all arches; # don't use it for make check. #- New patch, 40-a

Processed: setting package to facile libfacile-ocaml-dev, tagging 501672

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.26ubuntu13 > # > # facile (1.1-6.3) unstable; urgency=low > # > # * Fix ocamlopt usage; closes: #501672. > #- New dpatch, 30-non-opt-check, ocamlopt isn't available on all arches; >

Processed: Re: [Pkg-bazaar-maint] Bug#501597: [bzr-gtk] nautilus-bzr.py is configured to be placed in the wrong directory

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 501597 +confirmed Bug#501597: [bzr-gtk] nautilus-bzr.py is configured to be placed in the wrong directory There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tra

Bug#501597: [Pkg-bazaar-maint] Bug#501597: [bzr-gtk] nautilus-bzr.py is configured to be placed in the wrong directory

tags 501597 +confirmed kthxbye Am Mittwoch, den 08.10.2008, 14:21 -0400 schrieb Servilio Afre Puentes: > In /usr/share/pyshared-data/bzr-gtk the nautiluz-bzr.py file is > configured to be placed under > > /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-1.0/python > > while the proper location looks to be >

Bug#501605: sympa: broken post-inst script

Niko Tyni wrote: severity 501605 serious tag 501605 - unreproducible thanks On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 01:42:39PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: Severity 501605 important thanks I have tested the installation of sympa as well and I can't reproduce the problem. Additional I auditted the post-i

Bug#501667: Fix

Line 367 from /usr/bin/soffice should be replaced from: fi to done -- Eugen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#501672: facile - FTBFS: ocamlopt: Command not found

Package: facile Version: 1.1-6.2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of facile_1.1-6.2 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 98 [...] > make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/facile-1.1/examples' > ocamlopt -I ../src -c ../src/facile.ml

Processed: Re: Bug#501667: openoffice.org-common: soffice script fails

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 501664 grave Bug#501664: openoffice.org-common: sh script syntax error prevents application start + bashism Severity set to `grave' from `important' > merge 501664 501667 Bug#501664: openoffice.org-common: sh script syntax error prevents appl

Processed: Re: Bug#501605: sympa: broken post-inst script

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 501605 serious Bug#501605: sympa: broken post-inst script Severity set to `serious' from `important' > tag 501605 - unreproducible Bug#501605: sympa: broken post-inst script Tags were: unreproducible Tags removed: unreproducible > thanks Stop

Bug#501667: openoffice.org-common: soffice script fails

severity 501664 grave merge 501664 501667 thanks Hi, g.gragnani wrote: > Package: openoffice.org-common > Version: 1:2.4.1-10 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > last version of openoffice comes with a soffice script > that fail with the following error: > /usr/bin/so

Processed: found 501028 in 1:3.0.0~beta2-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 501028 1:3.0.0~beta2-1 Bug#501028: python-uno: Can't get types when using Python bindings Bug marked as found in version 1:3.0.0~beta2-1. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#501667: openoffice.org-common: soffice script fails

Package: openoffice.org-common Version: 1:2.4.1-10 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable last version of openoffice comes with a soffice script that fail with the following error: /usr/bin/soffice: line 367: syntax error near unexpected token `fi' /usr/bin/soffice: line 367: `fi'

Bug#500807: no problem even with two IMAP accounts

FYI - I am running version 2.0.0.16-1 of Icedove with two IMAP accounts and have not had any problems at all. Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: sympa: broken post-inst script

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Severity 501605 important Bug#501605: sympa: broken post-inst script Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#501605: sympa: broken post-inst script

Severity 501605 important thanks Hi, I have tested the installation of sympa as well and I can't reproduce the problem. Additional I auditted the post-inst script and I can't see any condition under which one of the sed commands could fail. All seem reasonable and don't fail when I test them manu

Bug#496389: 4 more files to be fixed

This one time, at band camp, Pavol Rusnak said: > According to bugreport 5 files should be fixed and only one is fixed. > I'm attaching patch that fixes another 4 in similar fashion. Ah, fair enough. Somehow I missed them in the initial review, possibly because none f them were mentioned :/ Che

Bug#496389: 4 more files to be fixed

Stephen Gran wrote: Ah, fair enough. Somehow I missed them in the initial review, possibly because none f them were mentioned :/ Upstream bug: http://bugs.freeradius.org/show_bug.cgi?id=605 -- Best Regards / S pozdravom, Pavol RUSNAK SUSE LINUX, s.r.o Pa

Bug#496389: 4 more files to be fixed

According to bugreport 5 files should be fixed and only one is fixed. I'm attaching patch that fixes another 4 in similar fashion. -- Best Regards / S pozdravom, Pavol RUSNAK SUSE LINUX, s.r.o Package MaintainerLihovarska 106

Bug#391935: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#391935: Bug #391935: Re: The answer from Citrix & Xen.org

On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 01:33:22PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > > > Any free/community use can do whatever it wants, quite literally. > > Any commercial distribution that wishes to call itself Xen must be > > compatible with other Xen branded commercial offerings, otherwise > > the commercial dis

Bug#501651: debian-installer: Unable to install lenny onto a Sun logical domain

Package: debian-installer Version: 20080522 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Please note the system I'm reporting this bug on does not match the one I am having a problem with. I am unable to install Debian GNU/Linux "Lenny" onto a Sun LDOM via the netinstall (boot.img

Bug#501649: rkward: BROKEN - UNUSABLE

Package: rkward Version: 0.5.0b-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable While I also observe what is reported in bug 401110, namely: QFSFileEngine::open: No file name specified XML-parsing 'rkward/pages//rkward_welcome.rkh' : Could not open file for reading XML-parsing

Bug#482439: cfengine2: There are still a ton of segfaults

Richard A Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The current state (for me), is my amd64 servers (also clients) are > running fine... some of my x86 machines are still experiencing a > plethora of segfaults daily > > The private builds you did were gone, so I rebuilt the current > package sans the

Bug#501413: [debian-mysql] Bug#501413: Patch to correct intermittent FTBFS in test suite

Am Mittwoch, den 08.10.2008, 21:21 -0400 schrieb Michael Casadevall: > I've did done research into this bug, and I backported the fix from > the current mysql 5.0.x release. dpatch attached. Thanks a lot, I just added this patch to our svn repository, upload within the next days. Norbert