Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 447056 lpr
Bug#447056: logcheck-database: Logcheck-database cannot be installed
Bug reassigned from package `logcheck-database' to `lpr'.
> forcemerge 418393 447056
Bug#418393: Upgrade problem: lpr tries to overwrite logcheck-database files
Bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 418393 serious
Bug#418393: Upgrade problem: lpr tries to overwrite logcheck-database files
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
Jamey Sharp and I just finished a proposal and patches for a new
handoff interface between XCB and libraries like Xlib/XCB, which
should, among other things, fix this synchronization problem. Would
anyone experiencing this problem, or any other synchronization or
assertion problem with Xlib/XCB, p
Aquire Prsecriptions before it is too late
http://www.batwingact.ball.sideweather.com
but ailanthusaurochs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 03:14:58AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Craig Sanders wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 01:16:22AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> >
> One of the reasons, why it is done this way, ist that you can't
> guarantee a clean shutdown of the daemon, when you have repl
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 03:00:49AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Craig Sanders wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 01:16:22AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> >
> >> grep "invoke-rc.d .* stop" *.prerm
> >
> > 1. the fact that some other packages have the same or similar broken
> > behaviour as you
Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 01:16:22AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
One of the reasons, why it is done this way, ist that you can't
guarantee a clean shutdown of the daemon, when you have replaced it's
files, while it is still running.
>>> name one daemon where
Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 01:16:22AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> grep "invoke-rc.d .* stop" *.prerm
>
> 1. the fact that some other packages have the same or similar broken
> behaviour as yours does not excuse or justify your package being broken.
You are talking about
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:10:07 +0100 Loïc JOUANIQUE
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didnt experience anything PPD-related (at least, I think so)...
> only a problem due to the font-management package in Debian loosing
> his mind after an upgrade to Ghostscript ... (look at my latest post,
> cant reme
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 01:16:22AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Craig Sanders wrote:
> > severity 471051 critical
> > thanks
> >
> > this bug can not be downgraded to normal because it is a bug that
> > results in a loss of important and irreplacable data. that is one of the
> > defining characte
Today we view amateur user Dan Jacobson (jidanni) as he attempts to
deal with the issue. After missing his apt-listchanges mail for so
long, he finally rummages around the bug system and finds the magic
commands
# db4.6_dump /var/lib/apt/listchanges.db | db4.5_load a.db
bash: db4.5_load: command n
Aquire Prescirptions today!
http://www.ambulantabeyant.alimony%2Egreatcanadianpharm.com
, bartendapostrophe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig Sanders wrote:
> severity 471051 critical
> thanks
>
> this bug can not be downgraded to normal because it is a bug that
> results in a loss of important and irreplacable data. that is one of the
> defining characteristics of a critical bug. loss of logging also has
> security implications,
Redeem Prescriptoins asap
www.abrasivebatchelder.adrian%2Egolipero.com
and afflictadjunct
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:13:27AM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
>
> I can sponsor this today but please fix the copyright
> before. It is not listing the copyright holder, year etc.
> Please see
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html.
I'm aware of this copyright
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 23:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#470640: fixed in horde3 3.1.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #470640,
regarding horde3: CVE-2008-1284 file inclusion vulnerability
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Get Presrciptions asap
www.www.anagrambarre.ashamed%2Elitulipog.com
but barcelonaaffidavit
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 23:21:37 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379388: fixed in pgapack 1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #379388,
regarding pgapack license is non-free, restricts selling
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 23:21:37 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404027: fixed in pgapack 1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #404027,
regarding file conflict between openmpi-dev and pgapack
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Hi Gregory,
* Gregory Colpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-15 23:56]:
[...]
> - Sid version (source package and debdiff):
> http://gcolpart.evolix.net/debian/horde3/horde3_3.1.7-1.dsc
> http://gcolpart.evolix.net/debian/horde3/horde3_3.1.6-1_3.1.7-1.diff
>
> [Note: I'm waiting sponsoring for sid
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 05:48:39PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 08:21:24PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> wrote:
> > This is not the reason why the buildd daemon tries to build the
> > documentation. It is building it because it is calling build, and not just
> > bui
Hi Gregory,
On Saturday 15 March 2008 23:52, Gregory Colpart wrote:
> - Sarge version (source package and debdiff):
> http://gcolpart.evolix.net/debian/horde3/horde3_3.0.4-4sarge7.dsc
> http://gcolpart.evolix.net/debian/horde3/horde3_3.0.4-4sarge6_3.0.4-4sarge7
>.diff
>
> - Etch version (source pa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 471051 critical
Bug#471051: rsyslog shuts down too early during upgrade
Severity set to `critical' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 388691 pending
Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues
Tags were: etch-ignore moreinfo
Tags added: pending
> tags 454359 pending
Bug#454359: ITP: python-processing -- spawning processes mimic
Hello,
The package horde3 has vulnerability (See CVE-2008-1284, bug
#470640 and changelogs of fixed sarge/etch/sid packages).
I prepared fixed packages:
- Sarge version (source package and debdiff):
http://gcolpart.evolix.net/debian/horde3/horde3_3.0.4-4sarge7.dsc
http://gcolpart.evolix.net/debi
Package: php5
Version: 5.2.0-8+etch10
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
The timezone data included in the current Etch build of PHP5 is out of
date. This causes timezone related calculations to be incorrect for
some parts of the world, notably (from 2:00am this morning) N
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:59:18 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#467650: fixed in debian-edu 0.828
has caused the Debian Bug report #467650,
regarding missing build-dependency on apt
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Package: openglad
Version: 0.98-3
Followup-For: Bug #463158
Here's a patch that fixes suspicious uses of "unsigned long" and several
problems reported by valgrind. Now I can get the game to start and I was
able to play for a few minutes. I still got a segfault somewhere in the
second scenario but
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:59:18 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#470265: fixed in debian-edu 0.828
has caused the Debian Bug report #470265,
regarding debian-edu: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `./debian-edu-tasks.desc': No such
file or directory
to be marked as
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:59:18 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#469903: fixed in debian-edu 0.828
has caused the Debian Bug report #469903,
regarding debian-edu - writes outside of build directory
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Hello,
I am glad to inform you that release candidate for 3.1.0 is in a good
condition and rc4 has been released a two weeks ago. I prepared new version
of imms package based on 3.1.0-rc4 which contains plugin for audacious and
does not contain xmms plugin anymore.
The package can be found on me
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 08:21:24PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> This is not the reason why the buildd daemon tries to build the
> documentation. It is building it because it is calling build, and not just
> build-arch. I'm going to fix that, however.
Just to clarify, your build t
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:17:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#445113: fixed in snort 2.7.0-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #445113,
regarding snort: FTBFS on a few archs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 04:56:18PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 08:21:24PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 01:11:56PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> > > This bug is still present[0] and is holding up an RC bug fix for
> > > Snort[1] from
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 20:47:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#469431: fixed in hipo 0.6.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #469431,
regarding file conflicts between packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 08:21:24PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 01:11:56PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> > This bug is still present[0] and is holding up an RC bug fix for
> > Snort[1] from propagating to testing. The problem looks to be two-fold.
> >
> > Fi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 470485 2.7.3-1
Bug#470485: fuse-utils: fails to install /dev/fuse
Bug marked as found in version 2.7.3-1.
> severity 470485 grave
Bug#470485: fuse-utils: fails to install /dev/fuse
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> quit
Stopping process
I am working on bringing projectcenter.app in shape.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 20:53:15 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #458516,
regarding lirc-modules-source: cannot build lirc_dev on 2.6.23-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Package: openglad
Version: 0.98-3
Followup-For: Bug #463158
Ok, when I said it all checked out I forgot to look for the obvious.
That code manipulates 4-byte pixel values and it assumes that "unsigned long"
is 4 bytes long. That's not so on a 64-bit platform.
I tried globally replacing "unsigned
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 01:11:56PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> This bug is still present[0] and is holding up an RC bug fix for
> Snort[1] from propagating to testing. The problem looks to be two-fold.
>
> First, the check added in 2.7.0-9 to prevent building the documentation
> will fail in dirty
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:02:27 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#455262: fixed in tftp-hpa 0.48-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #455262,
regarding tftpd-ha: Uses undocumented virtual package 'tftpd'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package ratpoison
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ratpoison
> tags 467076 + moreinfo
Bug#467076: ratpoison: still keyboard problems
Tags were: moreinfo unreproducible
Tags added: moreinfo
> severity 467076 normal
Bug#467076: ratpoison: still keyboard p
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
it doesn't show changelogs for a package it considers new (as it would
else show YEARS of useless changelogs since it's not really "changes").
So you won't see changelogs for upgrades on your _next_ upgrade of those
packages, only for the one after that.
Thank you very
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:20:48 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FWD: Bug#471037: [Debconf-devel] Bug#471037: debconf: perl
problems
has caused the Debian Bug report #471037,
regarding debconf: perl problems
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Package: libmlt0.2
Version: 0.2.4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
libmlt0.2 and libmlt0.2.5 cannot be installed at the same time:
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libmlt0.2_0.2.4-2_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/mlt/modules/feeds
Package: openglad
Version: 0.98-3
Followup-For: Bug #463158
I have the same problem as Guus Sliepen. When I start openglad, it opens a
blank window and then segfaults.
I compiled it myself with just -g, and found that it crashes here:
#0 0x0045bde5 in Scale_SuperEagle (src=0x733f30 "",
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 465598 etch
Bug#465598: libsdl-image1.2: Security update 1.2.5-2etch1 is not installed
Tags were: security
Tags added: etch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:58:19 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #466818,
regarding python-matplotlib: ImportError: No module named numpy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
> severity 450674 important
Bug#450674: reportbug can't handle messy utf8
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > /var/lib/schroot/mount/sid32-e0221d34-ac59-4eb7-8a9a-eed3dd9f18ef/build/user/python-django_0.96.1-3.diff.gz:
> > MD5SUM mismatch
> > (d2653ab52567436d0ee0d3c59410aa7e60b5fdf92ad05c6e1c58bc820e1bda31 cf
> > dbc74dd2bf7093031016b0f4e2dd7813
> > FAILED
found 445113 2.7.0-11
thanks
This bug is still present[0] and is holding up an RC bug fix for
Snort[1] from propagating to testing. The problem looks to be two-fold.
First, the check added in 2.7.0-9 to prevent building the documentation
will fail in dirty chroots. Since the latex packages take
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
> #
> # gawk (1:3.1.5.dfsg-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
> #
> # * add 25_free_wstr-and-multiple-frees.dpatch: brought in some changes from
> #current CVS, to resolve an issue with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 445113 2.7.0-11
Bug#445113: snort: FTBFS on a few archs
Bug marked as found in version 2.7.0-11 and reopened.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my gawk 1:3.1.5.dfsg-4.1 NMU, uploaded in
DELAYED/5
diff -u gawk-3.1.5.dfsg/debian/patches/00list
gawk-3.1.5.dfsg/debian/patches/00list
--- gawk-3.1.5.dfsg/debian/patches/00list
+++ gawk-3.1.5.dfsg/debian/patches/00list
@@ -4,0 +5 @@
+25_free_wstr-and-multiple-frees
d
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
#
# gawk (1:3.1.5.dfsg-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * add 25_free_wstr-and-multiple-frees.dpatch: brought in some changes from
#current CVS, to resolve an issue with multiple frees (Closes: 418790).
#Thanks to Micah C
lör 2008-03-15 klockan 12:38 -0400 skrev Joey Hess:
> Jörgen Tegnér wrote:
> > syntax error at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/DbDriver/Copy.pm line 33, near
> > "%>"
>
> You apparently have a corrupt version of this file. You probably need to
> force a reinstallation of the debconf package. You might w
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429249: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #429249,
regarding lirc-modules-source does not build, ever
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429249: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #429249,
regarding lirc-modules-source: doesn't build driver modules
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429249: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #429249,
regarding lirc-modules-source: Modules do not build from source
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Jörgen Tegnér wrote:
> syntax error at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/DbDriver/Copy.pm line 33, near
> "%>"
You apparently have a corrupt version of this file. You probably need to
force a reinstallation of the debconf package. You might want to
investigate why the file became corrupt on your system.
-
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400494: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #400494,
regarding LIRC kernel modules do not compile with kernel 2.6.19
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#457858: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #457858,
regarding lirc-modules-source: Modules do not build from source
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400494: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #400494,
regarding lirc-modules-source build failed on 2.6.19
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447172: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #447172,
regarding lirc-modules-source: Modules do not build from source
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440514: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #440514,
regarding lirc-modules-source: doesn't build driver modules
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#399135: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #399135,
regarding lirc-modules-source build failed on 2.6.19
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#399135: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #399135,
regarding LIRC kernel modules do not compile with kernel 2.6.19
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464777: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #464777,
regarding lirc-modules-source: fails to build with 2.6.24
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440514: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #440514,
regarding lirc-modules-source: Badly documented, doesn't work
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440514: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #440514,
regarding lirc-modules-source: Modules do not build from source
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429249: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #429249,
regarding lirc-modules-source: Badly documented, doesn't work
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#440514: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #440514,
regarding lirc-modules-source does not build, ever
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#457858: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #457858,
regarding lirc-modules-source: Badly documented, doesn't work
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#399135: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #399135,
regarding Please ship bttv.h in linux-headers-*
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#457858: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #457858,
regarding lirc-modules-source does not build, ever
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#457858: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #457858,
regarding lirc-modules-source: doesn't build driver modules
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447172: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #447172,
regarding lirc-modules-source: doesn't build driver modules
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400494: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #400494,
regarding Please ship bttv.h in linux-headers-*
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447172: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #447172,
regarding lirc-modules-source does not build, ever
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447172: fixed in lirc 0.8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #447172,
regarding lirc-modules-source: Badly documented, doesn't work
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my notebook 0.2rel-2.1 NMU (sent in DELAYED/2).
diff -u notebook-0.2rel/debian/dirs notebook-0.2rel/debian/dirs
--- notebook-0.2rel/debian/dirs
+++ notebook-0.2rel/debian/dirs
@@ -2 +1,0 @@
-usr/sbin
diff -u notebook-0.2rel/debian/control notebook-0.2rel/debian/control
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
> #
> # notebook (0.2rel-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
> #
> # * Remove spurious libxml dependency (Closes: 470002).
> #
> package notebook-gtk2 notebook
Ignoring bugs not assigned to:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
#
# notebook (0.2rel-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * Remove spurious libxml dependency (Closes: 470002).
#
package notebook-gtk2 notebook
tags 470002 + pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 12:18:02AM +, martin f krafft wrote:
> tags 457185 fixed-upstream pending confirmed
> thanks
>
> This is Gentoo bug #199806, fixed upstream by Alon Bar-Lev. I shall
> make a 1.98 release as soon as the co-upstreams agree.
Hi martin, any news on that front ?
--
·O·
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 470453 bash
Bug#470453: less: Does not show contents of plain text files with .deb or .udeb
extention
Bug reassigned from package `less' to `bash'.
> severity 470453 normal
Bug#470453: less: Does not show contents of plain text files with .de
reassign 470453 bash
severity 470453 normal
thanks
Hi
Using lesspipe by default in bash does change some behavior, but is not
release critical. I agree that some of the changed behavior is
surprising for experienced users...
Maybe lesspipe should not be made the default when using bash by
commen
Your message dated Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:17:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#469171: fixed in harden 0.1.33
has caused the Debian Bug report #469171,
regarding uninstallable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
tag 470814 pending
kthxbye
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 20:25 +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> f-spot FTBFS with glib 2.16 because G_GNUC_FUNCTION was marked as
> deprecated and f-spot compiles with -DG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED.
This was noticed upstream, and should be fixed in f-spot 0.4.2, due to
be uploaded
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 470814 pending
Bug#470814: FTBFS with glib 2.16
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
> forcemerge 452718 454965
Bug#452718: ttf-opensymbol non-installable
Bug#454965: ttf-opensymbol: uninstallable
Forcibly Merged 452718 454965.
>
End of message, stopping processing
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 01:40:41PM +, Felix Homann wrote:
> Option 1 seemed most reasonable to me since apparently nobody feels
> responsible for fixing the issue!
I cannot fix that in a reasonable way (depending upon db4.5-utils and
db4.6-utils just for that isn't just an option). It's not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 471051 normal
Bug#471051: rsyslog shuts down too early during upgrade
Severity set to `normal' from `critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
severity 471051 normal
thanks
Craig Sanders wrote:
> Package: rsyslog
> Version: 2.0.3-1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: causes serious data loss
>
>
> rsyslog shuts down at the start of the upgrade and only gets restarted
> when the package is configured.
>
> this is broken. instead of s
Package: debhelper
Version: 6.0.8
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
dh_installinit adds code to a package's .prerm script to stop the daemon
at the beginning of the upgrade, and then adds code to restart it in the
.postinst script.
this results in important system daemon
Package: rsyslog
Version: 2.0.3-1
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
rsyslog shuts down at the start of the upgrade and only gets restarted
when the package is configured.
this is broken. instead of stopping rsyslog in the prerm and starting it
in the postinst, just resta
Here is a possible replacement:
http://plib.sourceforge.net/fnt/
plib is in Debian main, so that works.
I'll have a look at switching to it for the next release.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Everything seems to be fine afterwards again.
of course, and you just trashed your whole history with it, nice... or
not.
Well, without knowledge of the intrinsics, I was faced with only 3 options:
1. continue using apt-listchanges but trashing the history
2. remove
tag 470640 + pending
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 02:36:59AM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> attached is a patch for an NMU fixing this issue.
> It will be also archived on:
> http://people.debian.org/~nion/nmu-diff/horde3-3.1.6-1_3.1.6-1.1.patch
Note : I'm so sorry, I didn't mail you or tag "p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 470640 + pending
Bug#470640: horde3: CVE-2008-1284 file inclusion vulnerability
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
