Package: boo
Version: 0.8.0.2730-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
boo 0.8.0 breaks ABI compared to the older versions and depending
packages, like banshee, fail to load the boo assemblies after an
upgrade.
Please package the runtime libraries in a new, versioned binary package
or provide policy assemblies i
Package: boo
Version: 0.8.0.2730-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
the pkg-config file of boo 0.8.0.2730-1 still lists /usr/lib/boo/*.dll
as libraries but they were moved to /usr/lib/mono/boo with the latest
upload.
Bye
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> Why is 456898 marked as a blocker for this bug?
Because in the process of resolving this unrelated bug I believe I got
hit by the same issue:
/usr/bin/../lib/libgsl.so.0: undefined reference to `cblas_ctrmv'
/usr/bin/../lib/libgsl.so.0: undefined reference to `cblas_zsw
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458667: fixed in gnome-rdp 0.2.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: libcwiid1-dev
Version: 0.6.00-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
cwiid.h in libcwiid1-dev includes bluetooth/bluetooth.h, found in
libbluetooth-dev. However, libcwiid1-dev does not depend on
libbluetooth-dev. This makes it impossible to build any program which
inc
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458759: fixed in therion 0.5.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 3 Jan 2008 03:49:40 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#444361: therion_0.5.0-1(hppa/experimental): FTBFS:
build-depends on removed package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 453166 458771
Bug#453166: subversion: FTBFS: swig_ruby_external_runtime.swg:819: error:
redefinition of '_mSWIG'
Bug#458771: subversion: FTBFS: duplicate definition of '_mSWIG'
Forcibly Merged 453166 458771.
> thanks
Stopping processing he
Why is 456898 marked as a blocker for this bug? adun.app is a GNUstep
program, so should not be using qmake, which is the usage that 456898 claims
is broken; and adun.app does not itself pass -Wl,--as-needed during the
build. So why does this have anything to do with building adun.app (and
fixing
forcemerge 453166 458771
thanks
[Martin Pitt]
> /tmp/subversion-1.4.4dfsg1/subversion/bindings/swig/proxy/swig_ruby_external_runtime.swg:819:
> error: redefinition of '_mSWIG'
> /tmp/subversion-1.4.4dfsg1/subversion/bindings/swig/proxy/rubyhead.swg:107:
> error: previous definition of '_mSWIG'
On 2008-01-02 17:42 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: therion
> Version: 0.5.0-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package is failing to build with the following error:
> pdftex thbook.tex
> This is pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (Web2C 7.5.6)
> %&-line parsing enabled.
> kpathsea: Runni
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:17:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458651: fixed in boo 0.8.0.2730-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2008 23:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458440: fixed in claws-mail 3.2.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On 1/2/08, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> $ getconf CHILD_MAX
> undefined
OK, this is an upstream bug. I'll patch it in a little while.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 457626 normal
Bug#457626: cegui-mk2: FTBFS because of a missing header
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Package: netstat-nat
Version: 1.4.8-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
Netstat-nat simply segfaults.
-
gw:~# netstat-nat
Proto NATed Address Destination Address
State
Segmentation fault
gw:~#
-
severity 458532 important
thanks
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 02:01:00PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Package: clamav
> Version: 0.90.1-3etch7
> Severity: critical
> Tags: security
This doesn't warrant an RC security bug.
> Two new CVEs for clamav:
>
> Name: CVE-2007-6595
> Status: Candidate
> URL:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 458532 important
Bug#458532: Clamav vulnerable to symlink attack
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
#sowwy. local mail problems
merge 458687 458690
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
According to this [1], it seems that Ogre has deprecated his Input
methods, and instead are using OIS, but CEGUI has not removed the
related code in the released version (but appears to be done in the svn
code).
So, this is an upstream bug, which I hope sooner or later will be
solved.
About
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
#sowwy. local mail problems
merge 436164 458690
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> #sowwy. local mail problems
> merge 458687 458690
Bug#458687: dash: REGRESSION in expanding foo/bar/*.sh
Bug#458690: dash: REGRESSION in expanding foo/bar/*.sh
Merged 458687 458690.
On Wednesday 02 January 2008, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote:
> Am Sunday, den 30 December hub Debian Bug Tracking System folgendes in die
Tasten:
> > > KDE cannot be installed on current unstable systems:
> >
> > Welcome to debian unstabel. Just a few archs that is out of sync. It get
> > automatically
Am Sunday, den 30 December hub Debian Bug Tracking System folgendes in die
Tasten:
> > KDE cannot be installed on current unstable systems:
> Welcome to debian unstabel. Just a few archs that is out of sync. It get
> automatically straighten out quite soon.
Any idea when 'quite soon' will be?
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2008 20:47:19 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458698: fixed in monodoc 1.2.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 2 Jan 2008 21:48:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458764: Debian testing CD Installer dont work
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458693: fixed in mono-tools 1.2.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458672: fixed in f-spot 0.4.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:17:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#457791: fixed in libflickrnet 25277-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 458638 458282
Bug#458638: mu-cade: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgphobos
Bug#458282: mu-cade: linked against wrong libs, should use gdc as linker
Forcibly Merged 458282 458638.
> forcemerge 458637 458283
Bug#458637: titanion: FTBFS: /usr
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#457789: fixed in dfo 0.7+svn45-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: subversion
Version: 1.4.4dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
subversion currently fails to build:
/bin/sh /tmp/subversion-1.4.4dfsg1/BUILD/libtool --tag=CC --silent
--mode=compile cc -fno-strict-aliasing -g -O2 -fPIC
-I/tmp/subversion-1.4.4dfsg1/subversion/include
-I/tmp/subversion-1.4.4d
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:32:16 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458710: fixed in taglib-sharp 2.0.2.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#456644: fixed in edac-utils 0.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
OoO En ce milieu de nuit étoilée du mercredi 12 décembre 2007, vers
03:46, Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> CVE-2007-6321 details a XSS vulnerability in Roundcube 0.1rc2 and
> earlier. Its only affects users of IE who are using roundcube, so it may
> seem unimportant, but the sad
Thank you Mark and everyone who else participated. And thank you Mark for
hinting about return value -- apparently I've forgotten about 'no effect'
command at the end whenever I was tuning up from upstream init script.
I am about to upload fixed version. Instead of blurbing I will simply
give you
forwarded 458708 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351172
reassign 458708 mono-gmcs,nemerle
thanks
Hi,
I've forwarded this bug upstream, it's most likely a mono bug...
Bye
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:21:09 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line nemerle: FTBFS: ** ERROR **: file metadata.c: line 950
(mono_metadata_decode_row): assertion failed: (res_size == count)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that
Hello,
I don't know if this is related to this problem, but the symptoms
surely seems to be the same ones, so I thought I could post the link to
the conversation at kvm-devel about a bug that seems related to this one.
The thread starts at
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.
Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
Package: coolkey
version: 1.1.0-3
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071217 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Entering directo
Package: installation-report
Version: 2.31
Severity: critical
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
I try to use this image CD to install debian testing:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-kde-CD-1.iso
[ ] debian-testing-i386-kde-CD-1.is
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:48:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closed by already prepared upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
I can confirm, that this package should be removed. I've just been
through the same packages in Ubuntu; and indeed this package has no goal
anymore.
It builds libapache-mod-rpaf; but as apache1 has been removed this
binary should be removed. It also builds libapache2-mod-rpaf which is
superseeded
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11ubuntu2
> merge 458690 458687
Bug#458687: dash: REGRESSION in expanding foo/bar/*.sh
Bug#458690: dash: REGRESSION in expanding foo/bar/*.sh
Merged 458687 458690.
>
End of message, stop
This has been fixed upstream:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=utils/dash/dash.git;a=commitdiff;h=fd5400e5974f53ac6021bdcbc3f30ce91e6cb931
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:17:16 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458590: fixed in lazarus 0.9.24-0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 429126 + patch
A new upstream version supporting apache2.2 is avaible, and packaged.
Interdiff is attached.
libapache-mod-layout_5.0-1.interdiff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Removal request
This package should be removed from the archive.
It depends on apache, which is no longer in the archives. This module
have never been updated to be used with apache2, and is therefore
useless.
The cvs version of the package contains no apache2 support, and hasn't
been updated in
On 02/01/08 at 14:53 -0200, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Hi Lucas!
>
> On Jan 1, 2008 12:44 PM, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I see that you tagged this bug "pending" in November, but that there
> > hasn't been an upload since then. Are you still planning to upload a new
> > pack
This package should be removed from the archive.
It depends on apache, which is no longer in the archives. This module
have never been updated to be used with apache2, and is therefore
useless.
The cvs version of the package contains no apache2 support, and hasn't
been updated in many years.
Pac
Removal request
This package should be removed from the archive.
It depends on apache, which is no longer in the archives. This module
have never been updated to be used with apache2, and is therefore
useless.
The cvs version of the package contains no apache2 support, and hasn't
been updated in
Hi Lucas!
On Jan 1, 2008 12:44 PM, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see that you tagged this bug "pending" in November, but that there
> hasn't been an upload since then. Are you still planning to upload a new
> package?
Yes, we (http://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-gmagick/) are pl
Removal request
This package should be removed from the archive.
It depends on apache, which is no longer in the archives. The
functionality is already in apache2 by default:
"$ dpkg -S mod_filter
apache2.2-common: /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_filter.so"
Package has been removed in Ubnutu per th
Package: therion
Version: 0.5.0-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
pdftex thbook.tex
This is pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (Web2C 7.5.6)
%&-line parsing enabled.
kpathsea: Running mktexfmt pdftex.fmt
fmtutil: format directory `/home/buildd/.texm
This package should be removed from the archive.
It depends on apache, which is no longer in the archives.
This module have never been updated to be used with apache2, and is
therefore useless.
I've looked at the cvs version of the package; no apache2 support in
there; and equivalent functionalit
reassign 429123 ftp.debian.org
retitle 429123 RM: libapache-mod-iptos -- RoM; obsolete; apache1 only
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This package should be removed from the archive.
It depends on apache, which is no longer in the archives. This module
have never been updated to be used with apache2, and is therefore
useless.
No newer version is avaible at the authors site.
Package is already being removed in Ubuntu per the ab
This package should be removed from the archive.
It depends on apache, which is no longer in the archives.
This module have never been updated to be used with apache2, and is
therefore useless.
I've looked at the cvs version of the package; no apache2 support in
there.
For apache2 mod_auth_usera
This package should be removed from the archive.
It depends on apache, which is no longer in the archives. This module
have never been updated to be used with apache2, and is therefore
useless.
I've looked at the cvs version of the package; no apache2 support in
there, and last commit is 7 years
This package should be removed from the archive.
It depends on apache, which is no longer in the archives. This module
have never been updated to be used with apache2, and is therefore
useless.
I've looked at the cvs version of the package; no apache2 support in
there.
Package have already been
This package should be removed from the archive.
It depends on apache, which is no longer in the archives. The
functionality is already in apache2 by default:
"$ dpkg -S ldap | grep -i apache
apache2.2-common: /etc/apache2/mods-available/ldap.load
apache2.2-common: /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_lda
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 429123 ftp.debian.org
Bug#429123: please update/request removal of your package
Bug reassigned from package `libapache-mod-iptos' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> retitle 429123 RM: libapache-mod-iptos -- RoM; obsolete; apache1 only
Bug#429123: please u
On Sat, December 15, 2007 11:42, Richard Atterer wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 05:38:12PM -, Regis Boudin wrote:
>> Amaya build-depends on libwww and seriously relies on it. Removing it
>> will put me in a quite uncomfortable situation. I would like to avoid
>> following upstream who use a s
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458720: fixed in wmii2-doc 1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458715: fixed in wmii-doc 1:1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 458673 0.5.900-dev-20071222-2
Bug#458673: gxine: FTBFS: checking which logo format to use... configure:
error: no available demuxer for the logo image - rebuild/reinstall xine-lib?
Bug no longer marked as found in version 0.5.900-dev-20071222-
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458699: fixed in libmpd 0.15.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On 02/01/08 at 09:36 -0500, Chris Hanson wrote:
> On 1/2/08, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > How much memory is necessary to build mit-scheme ?! The system I'm
> > building on has 2 GB of RAM and 4 GB of swap.
>
> Not nearly that much. It needs perhaps 50 MB or so.
>
> What's t
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:47:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#456349: fixed in zipios++ 0.1.5.9+cvs.2007.04.28-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
On 1/2/08, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How much memory is necessary to build mit-scheme ?! The system I'm
> building on has 2 GB of RAM and 4 GB of swap.
Not nearly that much. It needs perhaps 50 MB or so.
What's the value of sysconf(_SC_CHILD_MAX) on that system? The table
be
Package: gajim
Version: 0.11.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
when I try to start gajim, it fails with the following error message:
% gajim --verbose
Requires docutils 0.4 for set_classes to be available
ImportError: could not import bonobo.ui
Traceback (mo
On 02/01/08 at 13:39 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> tag 458541 + pending
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I was trying to reproduce bug #431592 (openoffice.org: fails to build
> > with num-cpus>1), and I noticed that openoffice.org fails to build even
> > when num-cpus=1 now.
> >
>
On 02/01/08 at 08:12 -0500, Chris Hanson wrote:
> On 1/2/08, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package: mit-scheme
> > version: 7.7.90+20070909-1
> > Severity: serious
> > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080101 qa-ftbfs
> > Justification: FTBFS on i386
> >
> > Hi,
> >
>
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458724: fixed in aolserver4-nsopenssl 3.0beta22-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
severity 440893 important
tags 440893 unreproducible moreinfo help
thanks
Hi,
I couldn't reproduce this bug. On my environment, ede can be
installed smoothly (I checked with emacs22 22.1+1-2.3). More info is
needed.
Thanks for reporting,
MH
--
Masayuki Hatta
Graduate School of Economics, The
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:02:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431583: fixed in latex209 25.mar.1992-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:02:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458714: fixed in stfl 0.18-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:49:09PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:05:51PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Package: aolserver4
> > Version: 4.5.0-4
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > aolserver4 fails to install atleast on alpha since version 4.5.0-4.
> > Wit
Package: warzone2100
Version: 2.1.0~0.svn1436-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The attached patch fixes a problem on architectures where the char type is
unsigned by default: a value of an unsigned variable
Hi,
I just wanted to let you know that I also see this problem. Actually,
I haven't tried d-i's mini.iso, but kvm version 58+dfsg-1 wasn't able to
make my previous VMs come up.
Also, it won't let me install new VMs as all that I got is a blank
QEMU/KVM screen with no output at all. I tried
reassign 458724 aolserver4-nsopenssl
thanks
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:05:51PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: aolserver4
> Version: 4.5.0-4
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> aolserver4 fails to install atleast on alpha since version 4.5.0-4.
> With the latest version (4.5.0-14) it shows the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 440893 important
Bug#440893: ede: installation fails
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> tags 440893 unreproducible moreinfo help
Bug#440893: ede: installation fails
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo, help
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 458724 aolserver4-nsopenssl
Bug#458724: aolserver4: Fails to install: error while loading shared libraries:
libnsd.so
Bug reassigned from package `aolserver4' to `aolserver4-nsopenssl'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:05:51PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: aolserver4
> Version: 4.5.0-4
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> aolserver4 fails to install atleast on alpha since version 4.5.0-4.
> With the latest version (4.5.0-14) it shows the following error:
> Setting up aolserver4-core
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:05:51PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: aolserver4
> Version: 4.5.0-4
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> aolserver4 fails to install atleast on alpha since version 4.5.0-4.
> With the latest version (4.5.0-14) it shows the following error:
> Setting up aolserver4-core
On 1/2/08, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: mit-scheme
> version: 7.7.90+20070909-1
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080101 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to bui
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tag 458541 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I was trying to reproduce bug #431592 (openoffice.org: fails to build
> with num-cpus>1), and I noticed that openoffice.org fails to build even
> when num-cpus=1 now.
>
> Here is the interestin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> tags 458541 + pending
Bug#458541: openoffice.org: FTBFS: configure: error: mcs or al not found. Make
sure they're in the path or use --with-csc-path
There were no tags set.
Tags add
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
> package libdata-serializer-perl
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libdata-serializer-perl
> tags 458680 + pending
Bug#458680: libdata-serializer-perl: FTBFS: Can't locate Module/Build/
Hi Sebastian,
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:21:36 +0100, Sebastian Schleehauf wrote:
> This bug is excatly the same as #450499 but for i386 and not amd64.
> Package: texmacs
> Version: 1:1.0.6.11-1
> guile-1.8-libs| 1.8.1+1-5
I suspect you missed the following comments
forwarded 458695 http://bugs.mysql.com/33623
thanks
Am Mittwoch, den 02.01.2008, 13:25 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on i386.
Thanks, already reported upstream.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
Package: wmii2-doc
version: 1-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080101 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/hyperref/hyperref.
Package: tcpwatch-httpproxy
version: 1.3-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080101 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> rm -f debian/tcpwatch-httpproxy.substv
Package: aolserver4
Version: 4.5.0-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
aolserver4 fails to install atleast on alpha since version 4.5.0-4.
With the latest version (4.5.0-14) it shows the following error:
Setting up aolserver4-core (4.5.0-14) ...
Setting up aolserver4 (4.5.0-14) ...
Starting web server: aolse
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 458695 pending
Bug#458695: mysql-dfsg-5.0: FTBFS: failed test "view"
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 458695 http://bugs.mysql.com/33623
Bug#458695: mysql-dfsg-5.0: FTBFS: failed test "view"
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://bugs.mysql.com/33623.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:02:39 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > # Add commands to compile the package here
> > /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
> > Can't locate Module/Build/Compat.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl
> /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.8 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/p
Package: bitlbee
version: 1.0.4-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080101 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/user/bitlbee-1.0
Package: beagle-xesam
version: 0.1-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080101 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin
Package: stfl
version: 0.18-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080101 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/user/stfl-0.18/perl5
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo