Your message dated Mon, 27 Aug 2007 06:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439485: fixed in inventor 2.1.5-10-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 27 Aug 2007 06:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429681: fixed in ptex-bin 3.1.10~beta3+0.04b-4.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Mon, 27 Aug 2007 06:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430175: fixed in ptex-bin 3.1.10~beta3+0.04b-4.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Mon, 27 Aug 2007 05:32:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439473: fixed in gimp 2.4.0~rc1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 27 Aug 2007 05:32:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439473: fixed in gimp 2.4.0~rc1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 27 Aug 2007 05:32:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439473: fixed in gimp 2.4.0~rc1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
> the newest bc version isn't installable on my 32 bit Debian Sid.
Have you got any more information on this? I still can't reproduce it.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 20:11:00 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libpam-modules: pam_wheel broken (undefined symbol:
_pammodutil_getpwuid)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Hi.
I saw your NMU package. Thank you very much nion.
I'm preparing a new package with a new release with the upstreams (I
sent them many patches) in one week we will release a new upstream
version with many bugs fixed (included this and others bugs reported
in the BTS).
But I appreciated you so
Your message dated Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#432654: fixed in libatomic-ops 1.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 429115 5.3-1.3
Bug#429115: please update/request removal of your package
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 5.3-1.3, send any further explanations to
Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROT
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 439498 patch
Bug#439498: kde-guidance: FTBFS: ImportError: No module named pyqtconfig
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tag 439498 patch
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (25/08/2007):
> import pyqtconfig
> ImportError: No module named pyqtconfig
> make: *** [python-build-stamp-2.4] Error 1
Missing B-D on python-qt-dev, builds fine once installed, tagging
accordingly.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pg
tag 439506 patch
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (25/08/2007):
> checking for location of GLw includes...
> checking for GL/GLwMDrawA.h... no
> checking for X11/GLw/GLwMDrawA.h... no
> configure: error: *** Unable to locate GLwM includes.
> make: *** [config-stamp] Error 1
Missing B-D
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 439506 patch
Bug#439506: grass: FTBFS: configure: error: *** Unable to locate GLwM includes.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
tag 439504 patch
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (25/08/2007):
> File "src/qtuicompiler.py", line 20, in ?
> import pyqtconfig
> ImportError: No module named pyqtconfig
Missing B-D on python-qt-dev (maybe python-qt4-dev or an alternative
could do the job as well). Builds fine once
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 17:00:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439665: gnomesword: binNMU needed for libclucene0 ldbl
transition?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 439504 patch
Bug#439504: pykdeextensions: FTBFS: ImportError: No module named pyqtconfig
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
Nate Bargmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (26/08/2007):
> Package: kdelibs4c2a
> Version: 4:3.5.7.dfsg.1-5
> Followup-For: Bug #439411
>
>
> I just performed an update and kdelibs4c2a 4:3.5.7.dfsg.1-6 is shown
> as UNAVAILABLE in aptitude for the kdelibs 4:3.5.7.dfsg.1-6 package.
> Looking at the experim
Package: kdelibs4c2a
Version: 4:3.5.7.dfsg.1-5
Followup-For: Bug #439411
I just performed an update and kdelibs4c2a 4:3.5.7.dfsg.1-6 is shown as
UNAVAILABLE in aptitude for the kdelibs 4:3.5.7.dfsg.1-6 package. Looking
at the experimental pool I see that 4:3.5.7.dfsg.1-6 is available for amd64,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 439485 patch
Bug#439485: inventor: FTBFS: error: GL/GLwMDrawA.h: No such file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
tag 439485 patch
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (25/08/2007):
> MyTextureEd.c++:76:26: error: GL/GLwMDrawA.h: No such file or
> directory
Missing B-D on libglw1-mesa-dev, builds fine once it is installed;
tagging accordingly.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpx8VlPJo3zU.pgp
Descriptio
Your message dated Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:24:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439477: ogre: FTBFS: checking for ZZIPLIB... configure:
error: Package requirements (zziplib) were not met
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:24:39 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [pango-graphite] broken B-D: libgraphite-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 439471 patch pending
Bug#439471: fenix-plugins: FTBFS: configure.ac:17: error: possibly undefined
macro: AC_DISABLE_STATIC
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
tag 439471 patch pending
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (25/08/2007):
> autoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoconf --force
> configure.ac:17: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_DISABLE_STATIC
> If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
> See the Auto
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 439494 patch
Bug#439494: cvs2html: FTBFS: unmet b-dep grep-dctrl (>= 1.1)
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
tag 439494 patch
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (25/08/2007):
> Note, selecting dctrl-tools instead of grep-dctrl
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> dctrl-tools
Updating the B-D from one to the other should be sufficient; tagging
accordingly.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Bruleb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 439482 patch
Bug#439482: packit: FTBFS: error: net/bpf.h: No such file or directory
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
tag 439482 patch
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (25/08/2007):
> globals.h:34:21: error: net/bpf.h: No such file or directory
Same comment/patch as for #439458 and #439459: need for an explicit B-D
on libpcap0.7-dev, or code change needed to cope with its bpf.h's
absence (in case it's n
tag 439459 patch
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (25/08/2007):
> ./base/pcap-snoop.c:52:21: error: net/bpf.h: No such file or directory
> ./base/pcap-snoop.c: In function 'main':
> ./base/pcap-snoop.c:207: warning: passing argument 2 of 'signal' from
> incompatible pointer type
> ./base
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package polipo
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: polipo
> severity 439441 important
Bug#439441: polipo 0.9.12 from Etch segfaulting
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
De
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package polipo
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: polipo
> tags 439441 + upstream fixed-upstream
Bug#439441: polipo 0.9.12 from Etch segfaulting
Tags were: etch
Tags added: upstream, fixed-upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 439459 patch
Bug#439459: ssldump: FTBFS: error: net/bpf.h: No such file or directory
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 439458 patch
Bug#439458: tcpslice: FTBFS: error: net/bpf.h: No such file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tag 439458 patch
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (25/08/2007):
> ./tcpslice.c:38:21: error: net/bpf.h: No such file or directory
> ./tcpslice.c:124: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type
> ./tcpslice.c:808: warning: function definition has qualified void return type
S
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 22:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439566: fixed in celestia 1.4.1+cvs20070626-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
tag 439452 patch
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (25/08/2007):
> ../xmakemol.c:45:60: error: GL/GLwMDrawA.h: No such file or directory
> ../xmakemol.c: In function 'main':
> ../xmakemol.c:226: error: 'glwMDrawingAreaWidgetClass' undeclared (first use
> in this function)
> ../xmakemol.c:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 439452 patch
Bug#439452: xmakemol: FTBFS: error: GL/GLwMDrawA.h: No such file or directory
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
Hi.
Hing-Wah Wan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (26/08/2007):
> Package: gnomesword
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Would have been great to have the version here. 2.2.3-1+b2 I assume?
> libclucene0 have been renamed to libclucene0ldbl, but the package
> have not yet updated the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 439470 -1
Bug#439470: libtest-www-mechanize-perl: FTBFS: t/page_links_content failed
Bug 439470 cloned as bug 439724.
> reassign -1 libhttp-server-simple-perl 0.27-1
Bug#439724: libtest-www-mechanize-perl: FTBFS: t/page_links_content failed
Bug r
clone 439470 -1
reassign -1 libhttp-server-simple-perl 0.27-1
retitle -1 libhttp-server-simple-perl: background() returns before the server
is accepting requests
severity -1 important
tag 439470 patch
forwarded 439470 http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=27168
forwarded -1 http://rt.cpan.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> reassign 430386 apache2.2-common
Bug#430386: Bashizm in /etc/init.d/apache2
Bug reassigned from package `apache2' to `apache2.2-common'.
> forcemerge 430386 439715
Bug#430386: Bashiz
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> forcemerge 430386 439715
Bug#430386: Bashizm in /etc/init.d/apache2
Bug#439715: apache2.2-common: /etc/init.d/apache2 contains bash-specific
directives
Mismatch - only Bugs in the sa
Package: dcc-common
Version: 1.3.42-4
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
A vulnerability has been reported in dcc. CVE-2007-1047:
"Unspecified vulnerability in Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse (DCC) before
1.3.51 allows remote attackers to delete or add hosts in /
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 438879 normal
Bug#438879: FTBFS (Catalan patches applied in wrong order)
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 18:25:45 +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote
> As part of my NM application I am asked to fix an RC bug. I would
> like to go with this one, which is open for quite some time.
>
> If I am able to work it out, I will prepare a patch. I will also prepare
> an NMU (as part of my NM task
reopen 438879
thanks
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 07:39:04AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> rebuilding 2.0.6+debian-1 straight from the archive just works. I do not
> see this error you described.
This should explain why:
$ bash -c "echo debian/patches/ca_*.diff"
debian/patche
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 438879
Bug#438879: FTBFS (Catalan patches applied in wrong order)
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
fixed 435653 0.7.3.1
please close thanks
--
=
David D. Smith
Jabber/GoogleTalk: dds at jabber.org ; GPG: 0xE6511C7E
IRC: dds on irc.freenode.net ; MSN: dds4418 at hotmail.com
==
si
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 439573 important
Bug#439573: gdc-4.1 - FTBFS: make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
severity 439573 important
thanks
> No buildd is able to build it. amd64 and i386 was not uploaded from a
> buildd, the others failed.
You'll find the full amd64 build log here [0], excelsior has been able
to build it, and amd64 package has been uploaded from it.
[0]
http://buildd.debian.org/fet
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 439573 serious
Bug#439573: gdc-4.1 - FTBFS: make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
severity 439573 important
thanks
Bastian Blank writes:
> severity 439573 serious
> thanks
>
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 08:38:37PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Bastian Blank writes:
> > > Package: gdc-4.1
> > > Version: 0.23-4.1.2-15
> > > Severity: serious
> >
> > nice try; you should know be
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 439573 important
Bug#439573: gdc-4.1 - FTBFS: make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 07:10:50AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Niko Tyni dijo [Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 12:13:20PM +0300]:
> > > My vague guess about the reason is that "use of undefined variable in
> > > socket".
> > >
> > > Could it be that getprotobyname('tcp') returns undef?
> >
> > Yes, the pack
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 439452 +patch
Bug#439452: xmakemol: FTBFS: error: GL/GLwMDrawA.h: No such file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thankyou
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
tags 439452 +patch
thankyou
A simple addition to the Build-Depends seems to solve the
problem. Please find the patch attached.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
diff -urN xmakemol-5.15/debian/control xmakemol-5.15.0/debian/contro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 439573 serious
Bug#439573: gdc-4.1 - FTBFS: make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
On 8/26/07, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following error:
> cc -O -c -o elks.o elks.c
> elks.c:18:22: error: sys/vm86.h: No such file or directory
I know, I know. Sorry for that.
Version 0.16.17-2 was uploaded shor
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 11:05:02 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 0.36-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 439392
> http://bugzilla.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/show_bug.cgi?id=173
Bug#439392: backup-manager: password disclosure in backup uploads
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://bugzilla.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/show_bug
tags 439584 + moreinfo
thanks
On 8/25/07, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> [...]
> > Of 446 tests run:
> > 0 succeeded
> > 444 failed
> > 2 had expected failures
> > 0 succeeded unexpectedly
> > 0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 439584 + moreinfo
Bug#439584: monotone - FTBFS: 1 of 3 tests failed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 439500 + confirmed
Bug#439500: gutenprint: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat
`./debian/install/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/print': No such file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
tags 439500 + confirmed
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
>
> Relevant part:
> make[3]: Entering directory `/build/user/gutenprint-5.0.1/debian/build'
> make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-a
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:29:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439701: Acknowledgement (linux86: FTBFS: elks.c:18:22:
error: sys/vm86.h: No such file or directory)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Package: linux86
Version: 0.16.17-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following error:
cc -O -c -o elks.o elks.c
elks.c:18:22: error: sys/vm86.h: No such file or directory
elks.c: In function 'elks_init':
elks.c:37: error: invalid use of undefined type 'st
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Rene Engelhard writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > no, I don't care anymore about "delays" in NEW after having to wait
> > > about 12 or 13 days for a new binary with the last gcj-4.2 upload. If
> > > ftp-masters did make the decision that new binary pa
As part of my NM application I am asked to fix an RC bug. I would like
to go with this one, which is open for quite some time.
If I am able to work it out, I will prepare a patch. I will also prepare
an NMU (as part of my NM task), so if you'd like the fix can probably be
NMUed.
Regards Ben
--
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#438608: fixed in streamripper 1.62.2a-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Rene Engelhard writes:
> Hi,
>
> Matthias Klose wrote:
> > no, I don't care anymore about "delays" in NEW after having to wait
> > about 12 or 13 days for a new binary with the last gcj-4.2 upload. If
> > ftp-masters did make the decision that new binary packages have to
> > land in NEW, then they
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> no, I don't care anymore about "delays" in NEW after having to wait
> about 12 or 13 days for a new binary with the last gcj-4.2 upload. If
> ftp-masters did make the decision that new binary packages have to
> land in NEW, then they should process them in time. What do
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431162: fixed in po4a 0.32-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 423835 +pending
Bug#423835: debian-cd: Incorrect md5sum for Packages.gz files in Release file
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> tags 425600 +pending
Bug#425600: debian-cd: should include "local" packages when checking for
base_installable
Ta
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#433225: fixed in silgraphite2.0 1:2.2.0-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:17:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439656: fixed in xdelta3 0q.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi,
* Martin Loschwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-26 16:49]:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 04:19:14PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > I will get back with a security report this evening.
> >
> > Any news? :)
> gosh, wait a second. out of these reports, quite some only affect the
> versions starting f
On 2007-08-26 Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 04:13:35PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> On 2007-08-26 Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Package: libgnutls13
>> [...]
>>> I just apt-get upgraded and in the process installed libgnutls13
>>> 1.7.18-2.
Hi Stanislav,
> Somewhere inFlightDnsQueries becomes NULL but dnsTimeoutHandler called
> anyway and it then calls removeQuery.
> But I can't find in which case this condition might happened.
I've received this same bug report from somebody running 1.0.1, so it
looks like indeed there's a problem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> forwarded 439640
> http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-dev/2007-August/001859.html
Bug#439640: libgnutls13: latest version breaks mutt with imaps
Noted your statement that Bug ha
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:53:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#436382: loop-aes: FTBFS: unmet b-dep linux-support-2.6.21-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> notfound 439670 1.0.76-2
Bug#439670: depends on non-existing version of ecj-gcj
Bug no longer marked as found in version 1.0.76-2.
> found 439670 1.0.76-5
Bug#439670: depends on non-
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 04:19:14PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> > I will get back with a security report this evening.
>
> Any news? :)
> Cheers
> Nico
>
> --
> Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
> For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 e
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 04:19:14PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> > I will get back with a security report this evening.
>
> Any news? :)
> Cheers
> Nico
>
> --
> Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
> For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 e
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 04:13:35PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2007-08-26 Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package: libgnutls13
> [...]
> > I just apt-get upgraded and in the process installed libgnutls13
> > 1.7.18-2. Afterwards I had to find out that mutt doesn't work anymore.
On 2007-08-26 Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-08-26 Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package: libgnutls13
> [...]
>> I just apt-get upgraded and in the process installed libgnutls13
>> 1.7.18-2. Afterwards I had to find out that mutt doesn't work anymore.
> [...]
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Rene Engelhard writes:
> > Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
> > Version: 1.0.76-2
> > Severity: serious
>
> looks like a newbie gone wild and filing bug reports without looking
> into NEW first.
Irrelevant.
a) I am not a newbie. I just know it's not installable *now* and
ther
Hi,
> I will get back with a security report this evening.
Any news? :)
Cheers
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
pgpatS1wR4LDD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 14:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#434254: fixed in ipsvd 0.13.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Rene Engelhard writes:
> Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
> Version: 1.0.76-2
> Severity: serious
looks like a newbie gone wild and filing bug reports without looking
into NEW first.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> found 439640 1.7.18-1
Bug#439640: libgnutls13: latest version breaks mutt with imaps
Bug marked as found in version 1.7.18-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
Version: 1.0.76-2
Severity: serious
# apt-get install java-gcj-compat-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if
On 2007-08-26 Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: libgnutls13
[...]
> I just apt-get upgraded and in the process installed libgnutls13
> 1.7.18-2. Afterwards I had to find out that mutt doesn't work anymore.
[...]
The breakage happened in the 1.7.16 to 1.7.17 step.
cu andreas
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> notfound 439640 1.7.16-1
Bug#439640: libgnutls13: latest version breaks mutt with imaps
Bug no longer marked as found in version 1.7.16-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439464: fixed in regina-normal 4.3.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 439640 serious
Bug#439640: libgnutls13: latest version breaks mutt with imaps
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:46:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcj-4.1 - FTBFS: Broken recursive build-deps
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: gnomesword
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
libclucene0 have been renamed to libclucene0ldbl , but the package have not yet
updated the dependency
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:51:50 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line binNMU dependencies fixed in 2.5-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo