Bug#423295: libooc-vo: should this package be orphaned?

2007-05-10 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
Package: libooc-vo Version: 20020310-3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * Release Critical Bugs

Bug#423294: liblinux-aio-perl: should this package be orphaned?

2007-05-10 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
Package: liblinux-aio-perl Version: 1.9-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * Several Release Critica

Bug#423293: libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2: should this package be orphaned?

2007-05-10 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
Package: libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2 Version: 2.2.1-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * Several Release

Bug#423292: lessdisks: should this package be orphaned?

2007-05-10 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
Package: lessdisks Version: 0.5.3cvs.20040906-17 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * Several Release

Bug#423289: hsffig: should this package be orphaned?

2007-05-10 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
Package: hsffig Version: 0.1.2-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * Release Critical Bugs for open

Bug#423290: hwtools: should this package be orphaned?

2007-05-10 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
Package: hwtools Version: 0.8-6.1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * Release Critical Bugs for open

Bug#423285: fwatch: should this package be orphaned?

2007-05-10 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
Package: fwatch Version: 0.1-alpha-3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * Long standing Release Criti

Bug#423286: gpib: should this package be orphaned?

2007-05-10 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
Package: gpib Version: 3.2.06-3.1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * Several Release Critical Bugs

Bug#423287: harbour: should this package be orphaned?

2007-05-10 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
Package: harbour Version: 0.45.0-0.1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * Release Critical Bugs for o

Bug#423283: fgfs-atlas: should this package be orphaned?

2007-05-10 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
Package: fgfs-atlas Version: 0.3.0-4 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * Long Standing Release Criti

Bug#423282: eglade: should this package be orphaned?

2007-05-10 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
Package: eglade Version: 0.3.7-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * Depends on long standing RC Bug

Bug#423284: ftm: should this package be orphaned?

2007-05-10 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
Package: ftm Version: 0.0.7 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * Long standing Release Critical Bugs

Bug#423281: dazuko-source: should this package be orphaned?

2007-05-10 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
Package: dazuko-source Version: 1.62-beta-6-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * Several long stan

Bug#423280: FTBFS: previous declaration with ‘C++’ linkage conflicts with new declaration with ‘C’ linkage

2007-05-10 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
Package: dx Version: 1:4.4.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 0.0 package must BFS Hi, here is the problem: $ fakeroot apt-get -b source dx [...] /usr/include/X11/VendorP.h:87: error: previous declaration of ‘VendorShellClassRec vendorShellClassRec’ with ‘C++’ linkage /usr/include/Xm/V

Processed: severity 377100 grave

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 377100 grave Bug#377100: lesstif2-dev: #include is broken under C++ Bug#377230: Causes FTBFS with GCC 4.2: C/C++ linkage declarations conflict Severity set to `grave' from `normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#418837: swfdec-mozilla NMU

2007-05-10 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:00:12PM -0700, David Schleef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 08:46:31AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > It will do nothing good to have a dependency on libnspr4-0d. And the > > plugin should also depend on epiphany, kazehakase and galeon, but you'd > >

Bug#421982: commons-daemon: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler

2007-05-10 Thread Michael Koch
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:23:02PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > On 5/10/07, Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >BTW I don't remember changing anything in the build since the last version, > >which was autobuilt just fine. > That's what I thought. (but ths svn repo is a mess ;-)) The prob

Bug#421982: marked as done (commons-daemon: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler;)

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 07:25:07 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#421982: commons-daemon: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Bug#423247: hostap-driver: should this package be removed?

2007-05-10 Thread Faidon Liambotis
severity 423247 normal reassign 423247 ftp.debian.org retitle 423247 RM: hostap-driver -- RoM; now included in kernel thanks Lucas Nussbaum wrote: While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * According

Processed: Re: Bug#423247: hostap-driver: should this package be removed?

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423247 normal Bug#423247: hostap-driver: should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 423247 ftp.debian.org Bug#423247: hostap-driver: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `hostap-dr

Processed: retitle 423250 to RM: x264 -- RoFTPM; patent issues

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > retitle 423250 RM: x264 -- RoFTPM; patent issues Bug#423250: x264: not for debian -> mpeg patent stuff Changed Bug title to RM: x264 -- RoFTPM; patent issues from x264: not for debia

Bug#421503: telnetd-ssl resets ssl settings on upgrade

2007-05-10 Thread Ian Beckwith
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 02:19:29PM -0400, Shaya Potter wrote: > i use telnetd-ssl and modify inetd.conf to only allow ssl secured connections. > > However, every time it gets upgraded, this gets reset. This would seem to be > a > major security hole to me. erm, good point. The good news is it

Bug#423268: grub-pc: system unbootable when /boot and separate partion, doesnt detect other installed OSes.

2007-05-10 Thread Bharath Ramesh
Package: grub-pc Version: 1.95+20070507-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system After upgrading to the newer version of Grub2, postinst runs update-grub which uses hooks in /etc/grub.d/. If /boot is mounted on separate partition the grub.cfg still retains /boot/vmlinuz-* as th

Bug#423090: xserver-xorg-input-evdev: selecting evdev for keyboard driver crashes

2007-05-10 Thread Brice Goglin
severity 423090 important thank you Please don't use very very high severity without a good reason. Obviously, a crash of the X server does not break the whole system. A crash of the X server is generally considered "important". See http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities > When selecti

Processed: Bug#423090: xserver-xorg-input-evdev: selecting evdev for keyboard driver crashes

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423090 important Bug#423090: xserver-xorg-input-evdev: selecting evdev for keyboard driver crashes Severity set to `important' from `critical' > thank you Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracki

Processed: reassign 211765 to xorg-server, merging 211765 368564

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > reassign 211765 xorg-server Bug#211765: xfree86: material under GLX Public License and SGI Free Software License B is not DFSG-free Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg' to `xor

Bug#423145: marked as done (file conflicts between packages)

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 00:32:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#423145: fixed in cyrus-sasl2-heimdal 2.1.22.dfsg1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Processed: tag

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 423145 pending Bug#423145: file conflicts between packages There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian B

Bug#422047: #422047 caused by changes in libgnome2.0-cil packaging

2007-05-10 Thread Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz
Bug #422047 is caused by changes in the packaging of cil bindings to the gnome libraries. The following patch fixes the build dependencies. Unfortunately, that only allows the compile to proceed forward to a new error which I cannot help with, as my knowdledge of C# is close to 0. New Error -

Bug#418837: swfdec-mozilla NMU

2007-05-10 Thread David Schleef
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 08:46:31AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > It will do nothing good to have a dependency on libnspr4-0d. And the > plugin should also depend on epiphany, kazehakase and galeon, but you'd > had to first check in what directory they all look for plugins. It would > be a good idea t

Bug#362032: Please remove 'progsreiserfs' from the Archive

2007-05-10 Thread José Luis Tallón
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal After a full release cycle, it is high time we did. Having nobody actually using 'progsreiserfs' ---the installations reported by popcon are certainly due to mistaken installations looking for 'reiserfsprogs'---, and given that upstream dissapeared

Processed (with 1 errors): Orphaning ikvm

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423244 normal Bug#423244: ikvm: should this package be orphaned? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 423244 wnpp Bug#423244: ikvm: should this package be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `ikvm' to `wnpp'. > retitle 423244

Processed: tagging 421985

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > tags 421985 + pending Bug#421985: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXbae There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#423107: marked as done (rtorrent fails to start)

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 May 2007 00:10:23 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#423107: rtorrent fails to start has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#422077: xserver-xorg: Fatal server error on sparc: xf86MapPciMem failed

2007-05-10 Thread Brice Goglin
Here's a summary of what happen about this PCI breakage during the last days: Since umount /sys fixed the problem, it is clear that the bug is in the sys-based PCI domain code. Jim rebuilt the server using David Woodhouse's patch [1] which is applied in Fedora and disables the sysfs code on archit

Bug#423107: rtorrent fails to start

2007-05-10 Thread Skibbi
Adeodato Simó pisze: Uhm, very strange indeed. Particularly because you removed libtorrent.so.10* before reinstalling the package, which should have overwritten the broken symlink with the appropriate file. What does `ls -l /usr/lib/libtorrent.so.10*` say? $ ls -l /usr/lib/libtorrent.so.10*

Bug#423144: file conflicts between packages

2007-05-10 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
El jue, 10-05-2007 a las 09:29 +0200, Michael Ablassmeier escribió: > Package: gpredict, libgoocanvas-common > Severity: serious > Usertags: qa-file-conflict > Justification: Policy violation, see section 7.2 > > hi, > > > both gpredict and libgoocanvas-common ship > `/usr/share/locale/en_GB/LC_

Processed: bug 422077 is forwarded to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7248 ...

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2 > forwarded 422077 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7248 Bug#422077: xserver-xorg: Fatal server error on sparc: xf86MapPciMem failed Noted your statement that Bug has been f

Bug#356853: Relicensing the ae package under the LPPL

2007-05-10 Thread Florent Rougon
"Lars Engebretsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for doing all this work! I have now uploaded the updated > package to CTAN. That's great. Thank you very much, Lars. I cannot see the new version on CTAN yet, but I suppose it's a matter of days. Regards, -- Florent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Processed: Re: Bug#422353: tcm - FTBFS: error: conflicts with new declaration with 'C' linkage

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 422353 libxt-dev Bug#422353: tcm - FTBFS: error: conflicts with new declaration with 'C' linkage Bug reassigned from package `tcm' to `libxt-dev'. > found 422353 1:1.0.5-2 Bug#422353: tcm - FTBFS: error: conflicts with new declaration with 'C'

Bug#422353: tcm - FTBFS: error: conflicts with new declaration with 'C' linkage

2007-05-10 Thread Kurt Roeckx
reassign 422353 libxt-dev found 422353 1:1.0.5-2 thanks On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:12:35PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > /usr/include/X11/VendorP.h:87: error: previous declaration of > > 'VendorShellClassRec vendorShellClassRec' with 'C++' linkage > > /usr/include/Xm/VendorSP.h:58: error: confl

Processed: Please remove kernel-patch-bootsplash

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423245 normal Bug#423245: kernel-patch-bootsplash: should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 423245 ftp.debian.org Bug#423245: kernel-patch-bootsplash: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned fro

Bug#423010: vncserver not working at all

2007-05-10 Thread Folkert van Heusden
> Hi > You have some major permission problem. I did not see any E[permission denied] in the strace output? > When vnc tries to connect to the local port and open that, you > get connection refused... > port 6001 ip 192.168.64.100 yes that is because nothing is listening on that port > You do n

Bug#423107: rtorrent fails to start

2007-05-10 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Skibbi [Thu, 10 May 2007 22:06:19 +0200]: > Adeodato Simó pisze: > > # dpkg -i libtorrent10_0.11.4-1_i386.deb > > $ md5sum /usr/lib/libtorrent.so.10* > > (this should output, as said before, 3dc81e4136a6ebe4e34bbc5f962dcba7) > $ md5sum /usr/lib/libtorrent.so.10* > 52cf12ffe7b12174bf354b0dd3

Bug#393951: hsffig: FTBFS with ghc6 6.6

2007-05-10 Thread John Goerzen
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:06:18PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > BTW. I made little list of packages which FTBFS etc on > > http://wiki.debian.org/GhcTransition > > Any news on this ? This RC bug has been open for more than 200 days now, > and prevented hsffig from being included in etch. I or

Bug#423104: grub-pc not installing

2007-05-10 Thread Yann Dirson
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 06:06:17PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 10:01:06PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote: > > > > In case it helps: > > > > |# grub-probe -v /boot/grub > > |grub-probe: info: changing current directory to /dev > > |grub-probe: info: changing current directory t

Bug#423246: kernel-patch-2.6-reiser4: should this package be orphaned?

2007-05-10 Thread Domenico Andreoli
severity 423246 normal reassign 423246 wnpp retitle 423246 O: kernel-patch-2.6-reiser4 -- Kernel patches for Reiser4 FS thanks On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:14:38PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Hi, hi Lucas, > While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package > came up as a

Processed: Re: Bug#423246: kernel-patch-2.6-reiser4: should this package be orphaned?

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 423246 normal Bug#423246: kernel-patch-2.6-reiser4: should this package be orphaned? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 423246 wnpp Bug#423246: kernel-patch-2.6-reiser4: should this package be orphaned? Bug reassigned from pack

Bug#423250: x264: not for debian -> mpeg patent stuff

2007-05-10 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Package: x264, ftp.debian.org Severity: serious Hi oh meh, sorry for this mess, I shouldnt have allowed this package to go into Debian main in the first place. Now - it contains mpeg4 stuff, try googling for "mpeg4 patent" once and you know why it needs to go out. (And also because the general de

Bug#393951: hsffig: FTBFS with ghc6 6.6

2007-05-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Arjan & John, On 20/10/06 at 17:30 +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote: > Op vr, 20-10-2006 te 08:02 -0500, schreef John Goerzen: > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 12:37:49AM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote: > > > So either we use 1.0pl2 and fix it for compilation with GHC 6.6 or we > > > need to package HXT and g

Bug#423246: kernel-patch-2.6-reiser4: should this package be orphaned?

2007-05-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: kernel-patch-2.6-reiser4 Version: 20050715-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * RC buggy for a long

Bug#423244: ikvm: should this package be orphaned?

2007-05-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: ikvm Version: 0.28.0.0-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * RC buggy for a long time with not much

Bug#423247: hostap-driver: should this package be removed?

2007-05-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: hostap-driver Version: 1:0.4.1-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * According to #363377, hostap is now include

Bug#423245: kernel-patch-bootsplash: should this package be removed?

2007-05-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: kernel-patch-bootsplash Version: 2.6.16-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * obsolete, according to #404919 If

Bug#423107: rtorrent fails to start

2007-05-10 Thread Skibbi
Adeodato Simó pisze: # dpkg -i libtorrent10_0.11.4-1_i386.deb $ md5sum /usr/lib/libtorrent.so.10* (this should output, as said before, 3dc81e4136a6ebe4e34bbc5f962dcba7) $ md5sum /usr/lib/libtorrent.so.10* 52cf12ffe7b12174bf354b0dd31d7ae3 /usr/lib/libtorrent.so.10 (it seems I checked

Bug#423241: egnome: should this package be orphaned?

2007-05-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: egnome Version: 0.cvs20020302-4 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * RC bug open for more than 170 da

Bug#422477: goobox: FTBFS: gnome-doc-utils.make:63: HAVE_GNOME_DOC_UTILS does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL

2007-05-10 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Lucas, just a quick update. I am working on a new upstream version (currently SVN) which will resolve this FTBS. Since major dependencies changed I'll need a few days to polish the package. Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#423242: estraier: should this package be removed?

2007-05-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: estraier Version: 1.2.29-3 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * RC buggy for 170 days without comment from the m

Bug#423240: comedi: should this package be orphaned?

2007-05-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: comedi Version: 0.7.70-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-orphan Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * RC bug open for 200 days without answer

Bug#410441: goobox: Please switch to GStreamer 0.10 ASAP

2007-05-10 Thread Sebastian Dröge
On Do, 2007-05-10 at 21:52 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Hello Sebastian, > Just a quick update. I was able to build goobox (SVN head) with only > GStreamer 0.10 present. But I'v not really tested it yet. Also I will > need a few days to polish the package. > > Is there anything from the gstre

Processed: severity of 423123 is important

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > severity 423123 important Bug#423123: gpe-timesheet: missing dependency on gpe-icons Severity set to `important' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please co

Bug#410441: goobox: Please switch to GStreamer 0.10 ASAP

2007-05-10 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Sebastian, Just a quick update. I was able to build goobox (SVN head) with only GStreamer 0.10 present. But I'v not really tested it yet. Also I will need a few days to polish the package. Is there anything from the gstreamer side you'd like me to check / be aware of? Greetings

Bug#409475: marked as done (FTBFS: multiple definition of `entities')

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 May 2007 21:47:05 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing 420043 and 409475 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Bug#409475: marked as done (FTBFS: multiple definition of `entities')

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 May 2007 21:47:05 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing 420043 and 409475 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Bug#420043: marked as done (graphviz: FTBFS: multiple definition of `entities')

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 May 2007 21:47:05 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing 420043 and 409475 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Bug#420043: marked as done (graphviz: FTBFS: multiple definition of `entities')

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 May 2007 21:47:05 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing 420043 and 409475 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Bug#409475: Bug to be closed?

2007-05-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 10/05/07 at 18:05 +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-10 17:58]: > > according to the build logs, it looks like 2.12-1 builds fine everywhere > > (except on hppa, but looks like a temporary problem, -2 built fine). > > Does somebody see a problem with

Bug#423107: rtorrent fails to start

2007-05-10 Thread Adeodato Simó
Hi again. > I've downloaded official debian package, but md5 od the librottent file is: > 52cf12ffe7b12174bf354b0dd31d7ae3 /usr/lib/libtorrent.so.10 > I've downloaded file from: > http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/libt/libtorrent/libtorrent10_0.11.4-1_i386.deb > md5 of the package is OK

Bug#416496: boost_1.34.0~beta1-2(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: linking errors

2007-05-10 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Package: boost Version: 1.34.0~beta1-2 Severity: serious Hi, seems like the linking errors changed slightly. Didn't wanted to open a third FTBFS bug for HPPA so filing it here. Feel free to clone it if you think it is a sufficiently different issue. | Automatic build of boost_1.34.0~beta1-2 on m

Bug#423107: rtorrent fails to start

2007-05-10 Thread Skibbi
Adeodato Simó pisze: That md5sum does not match the one shipped in the official libtorrent10 0.11.4-1 (i386) package. Try reinstalling the libtorrent10 package, and check that afterwards the md5sum of /usr/lib/libtorrent.so.10 is 3dc81e4136a6ebe4e34bbc5f962dcba7. rtorrent should work then. I

Bug#423184: X driver

2007-05-10 Thread BARBIER Jean-Matthieu
Hello my X driver is ati from xorg, no propietary driver here... setting OPENGL_SUPPORT to no does not change anything. sorry pgp67HIAWFBZZ.pgp Description: PGP signature

Processed: mutt bug #396104

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 396104 1.5.9-2sarge2 Bug#396104: CVE-2006-529[78]: tempfile race conditions in mutt Bug marked as found in version 1.5.9-2sarge2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Bug#421982: commons-daemon: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler

2007-05-10 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
On 5/10/07, Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: BTW I don't remember changing anything in the build since the last version, which was autobuilt just fine. That's what I thought. (but ths svn repo is a mess ;-)) -- Arnaud Vandyck -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subjec

Bug#419035: rott: crashes on start

2007-05-10 Thread Yuri Kozlov
Hello. I apply your patch: [...] gcc -g -I/usr/include/SDL -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT -DUSE_SDL=1 -DPLATFORM_UNIX=1 -W -Wall -Wno-unused -m32 -DUSE_EXECINFO=1 -DDATADIR=\"/usr/share/games/rott/\" -c -o rt_scale.o rt_scale.c gcc -g -I/usr/include/SDL -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT -DUSE_SDL=1 -DP

Bug#421982: commons-daemon: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler

2007-05-10 Thread Marcus Better
BTW I don't remember changing anything in the build since the last version, which was autobuilt just fine. pgppQWJj5cT3F.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#392312: xserver-xorg-core: [sparc] Freezes system and causes severe data loss

2007-05-10 Thread Brice Goglin
> it seems that the bug is back in the experimental version of this package. > please see: > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/93041 I don't think it is related to this bug. I don't see anything about a freeze or data loss in the Ubuntu bug above. I would rather say that it is

Bug#418098: rdesktop fix test

2007-05-10 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi
Hi Paul, On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 13:36 +0200, Paul Coray wrote: > rdesktop 1.5.0-2 fixes the crash for me too - but, installing on etch, > apt asks for libc6 from unstable, which I wouldn't install. Guess some > nasty things would happen... Yes, glibc changed since then in Sid. Please don't mix p

Bug#423222: Acknowledgement (SIGBUS in _nss_mdns4_gethostbyaddr_r on SPARC)

2007-05-10 Thread Daniel Smolik
Main problem is name of second server. If I rename it to some name without numbers crash stops. Regards Dan Smolik -- Mydatex s r.o. http://www.mydatex.cz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mob: 604200362 tel: 226210085 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#423107: rtorrent fails to start

2007-05-10 Thread Adeodato Simó
Hi, thanks for your answer. It seems that the cause of the problem is this: > $ md5sum /usr/lib/libtorrent.so.10 > 52cf12ffe7b12174bf354b0dd31d7ae3 /usr/lib/libtorrent.so.10 That md5sum does not match the one shipped in the official libtorrent10 0.11.4-1 (i386) package. Try reinstalling the lib

Bug#423222: SIGBUS in _nss_mdns4_gethostbyaddr_r on SPARC

2007-05-10 Thread Dan Smolik
Package: libnss-mdns Version: 0.9-0.2 Severity: critical Tags: security I have two SPARC machines after latest upgrade apt install avahi-package and modify /etc/nsswitch.conf to use avahi. But now if I ping from one machine to second ping crasehd with SIGBUS. If I ping from second to first ping n

Bug#418350: fixed in pppconfig 2.3.16

2007-05-10 Thread Thomas Huriaux
Hi, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09/05/2007): > > Could you please explain why you removed the manpage instead of using a > > replace field as suggested... > > I don't see that pppconfig replaces manpages-fr. See policy 7.5.1. > In any case, If a French > man page for pppconfig is in manpag

Bug#421982: commons-daemon: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler;

2007-05-10 Thread Marcus Better
Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > I can build the package without problem here. Can you provide the conf log: Build log: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=commons-daemon compile: [javac] Compiling 6 source files to /build/buildd/commons-daemon-1.0.2~svn20061127/target/classes BUILD FAILE

Bug#421100: spampd patch

2007-05-10 Thread Alexander Wirt
Hi, sorry for taking a little bit longer. Attached is a patch against spampd which takes sure that it will get a nice and friendly environment and also sets a correct SA home for itself and his helpers. Alex -- Alexander Wirt, [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC99 2DDD D39E 75B0 B0AA B25C D35B BC99 BC7D 0

Bug#423159: emacs-snapshot: Can't install package

2007-05-10 Thread Norberto M. Lopes
Thanks for the quick reply. That didn't do it. :D But gave me a hint... I just cd /usr/bin; ln -s emacs-snapshot-x emacs-snapshot and then I reinstalled emacs-snapshot... If you think you can close the bug... be my guest :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsub

Bug#423107: rtorrent fails to start

2007-05-10 Thread Skibbi
$ which rtorrent /usr/bin/rtorrent $ md5sum /usr/lib/libtorrent.so.10 52cf12ffe7b12174bf354b0dd31d7ae3 /usr/lib/libtorrent.so.10 $ ldd /usr/bin/rtorrent libncurses.so.5 => /lib/libncurses.so.5 (0xb7f93000) libcurl.so.3 => /usr/lib/libcurl.so.3 (0xb7f5e000) libgssapi_krb5.so

Bug#422794: Starting is impossible

2007-05-10 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:14:02AM +0900, Jonny wrote: > > Does your video hardware support vesa? > > Yes, it works correctly if "c" is typed and input. > grub> font /boot/grub/unifont.pff > grub> insmod gfxterm > grub> set gfxmode=800x600x8 > grub> terminal gfxterm > > [...] > font /boot/g

Processed: Re: maintainer ping?

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package basilisk2 Ignoring bugs not assigned to: basilisk2 > fixed 337496 0.9.20060529-1 Bug#337496: basilisk2: Always crashes when starting up (home-built version does too) Bug marked as fixed in version 0.9.20060529-1. > tags 337887 unreproducible

Bug#337887: maintainer ping?

2007-05-10 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 package basilisk2 fixed 337496 0.9.20060529-1 tags 337887 unreproducible moreinfo help tags 309501 help thanks Lucas Nussbaum skrev: > You seem active otherwise, but haven't answered on those 3 RC bugs on > your package basilisk2. Do you plan to work

Bug#337496: marked as done (basilisk2: Always crashes when starting up (home-built version does too))

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 May 2007 18:04:44 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line maintainer ping? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Processed: severity of 423129 is serious ...

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > severity 423129 serious Bug#423129: Undefined symbol prevents glint driver from loading Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > forwarded 423129 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_b

Bug#423104: grub-pc not installing

2007-05-10 Thread Robert Millan
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 10:01:06PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote: > > In case it helps: > > |# grub-probe -v /boot/grub > |grub-probe: info: changing current directory to /dev > |grub-probe: info: changing current directory to evms > |grub-probe: info: changing current directory to dm > |grub-probe: i

Bug#420043: Bug to be closed?

2007-05-10 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, according to the build logs, it looks like 2.12-1 builds fine everywhere (except on hppa, but looks like a temporary problem, -2 built fine). Does somebody see a problem with closing these bugs? Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois pgp9p1CXk0AIQ.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#420043: Bug to be closed?

2007-05-10 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-10 17:58]: > according to the build logs, it looks like 2.12-1 builds fine everywhere > (except on hppa, but looks like a temporary problem, -2 built fine). > Does somebody see a problem with closing these bugs? No, please go ahead. -- Martin Michlma

Bug#421982: commons-daemon: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler;

2007-05-10 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
tags 421982 moreinfo tags 421982 unreproducible thanks On 5/2/07, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Package: commons-daemon Version: 1.0.2~svn20061127-5 [...] Your package is failing to build with the following error: compile: [javac] Compiling 6 source files to /build/buildd/commo

Bug#422655: fail2ban: leaving compiled python files after purging

2007-05-10 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
tags 422655 +pending thanks Hi Bernd, I am yet to look at your patch before releasing but I am afraid I will postpone the switch away from pycentral for now ;-) since it seems to be working just fine and the rule of thumb -- don't fix smth aint broken ;-) tentative package with 1 lines sed scrip

Bug#423159: emacs-snapshot: Can't install package

2007-05-10 Thread Sven Joachim
You probably have to fix the emacs-snapshot alternative (and possibly other alternatives) manually, please try update-alternatives --all (just keep pressing enter), as suggested by Henrique de Moraes Holschuh in bug #422979. After that you can retry to install or configure emacs-snapshot. Regar

Processed: Re: Bug#422655: fail2ban: leaving compiled python files after purging

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 422655 +pending Bug#422655: fail2ban: leaving compiled python files after purging Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adminis

Processed: Re: Bug#421982: commons-daemon: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler;

2007-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 421982 moreinfo Bug#421982: commons-daemon: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler; There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > tags 421982 unreproducible Bug#421982: commons-daemon: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler; Tags were: moreinfo T

Bug#423200: Acknowledgement (quake2: should this package be orphaned?)

2007-05-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Note that quake2-data should probably be orphaned as well. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM

Bug#423203: forrest: should this package be removed?

2007-05-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: forrest Version: 0.5.1-4 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * RC-buggy * no users (popcon insts: 1) * orphaned

  1   2   >