Probably, a better approach is to have iceape-browser,
iceweasel and libnspr4-0d declare "Provides: libnspr4",
and just have swfdec-mozilla depend on that name?
--
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
http://linux.thai.net/~thep/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
I have been waiting for the new swfdec plugin for a while, but it has
been blocked by this bug. So, I've tried to fix it for my own use.
At first, it looks weird to me to have build-dependency on iceape-dev
but then pull in libnspr4 (which is actually libnspr4-0d in the archive)
for the actual sh
James Troup a écrit :
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.5-4
> Severity: serious
>
> | Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.6.ds1-11 (using
> .../archives/libc6_2.5-4_arm.deb) ...
> | Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
> | dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.5-4_arm.deb
> (--unpack):
> | d
Your message dated Sun, 29 Apr 2007 00:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417789: fixed in elinks 0.11.1-1.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Wed, Apr 4, 2007 at 17:11:44 +0200, Arnaud Giersch wrote:
> Package: elinks
> Version: 0.11.1-1.2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security, patch
>
> Hi,
>
> Elinks loads untrusted gettext catalog from the relative directory
> "../po/", and crashes (SIGSEGV) if the loaded file is corrupted.
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 11:53:34AM +0200, Didrik Pinte wrote:
> I meant upgrading to 1.4.1 concerning the version, not 1.4.0 ;-)
>
> I had a quick look at what can be the problem. It seems that other
> people add the same one but it was using not updated svn version.
>
> http://lists.maptools.or
Hi. gss_set_allowable_enctypes does correctly set the fields in the
krb5_context that should control which enctypes are requested. The
problem though is that krb5_get_credentials gets a ticket with session
keys outside this restriction. so, something broke in respecting
enctype restrictions.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> tags 421372 + confirmed
Bug#421372: gnome-hearts: crashes at startup
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 10:44:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes:
> > Package: gij-4.1
> > Version: 4.1.2-4
>^^^
>
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm getting this error:
> > Unpacking gcj-4.1 (from .../gcj-4.1_4.1.2-4_amd64.deb) ...
> > Selecting pr
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:26:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 1.4.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> Package: gij-4.1
> Version: 4.1.2-4
^^^
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting this error:
> Unpacking gcj-4.1 (from .../gcj-4.1_4.1.2-4_amd64.deb) ...
> Selecting previously deselected package libgcj7-0.
> Unpacking libgcj7-0 (from .../libgcj7-0_4.1.1-2
Package: ldirectord
Version: 1.2.5-3
Severity: grave
Ldirector crashes because the package lacks a dep on
libmail-pop3client-perl :
DEBUG2: Checking negotiate: real
server=negotiate:pop:tcp:10.0.0.3:110\/:
(virtual=tcp:84.207.24.11:110)
Can't locate Mail/POP3Client.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:48:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fails to contact evolution 2.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 421341 by 421301
Bug#421301: should conflict against "old" java-gcj-compat-dev
Bug#421341: FTBFS: Something wrong with gcjh/classpath/something
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 421341 added: 421301
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
block 421341 by 421301
thanks
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 12:07:00PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
>It is fully reproducible on powerpc with the same output.
I noticed that gcj-4.1 is currently broken in Sid. Please see
Bug#421301 for reference.
Cheers,
--
.''`. Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :' :
`. `'`
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:19:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line binNMUs for the libdevmapper1.02 -> libdevmapper1.02.1
transition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:19:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line binNMUs for the libdevmapper1.02 -> libdevmapper1.02.1
transition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:19:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line binNMUs for the libdevmapper1.02 -> libdevmapper1.02.1
transition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 419919 + patch
Bug#419919: libsnmp10-dev: Please stop renaming the -dev package.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
tags 419919 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my net-snmp 5.3.1-3.1 NMU which I'll upload to
DELAYED-7.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
diff -u net-snmp-5.3.1/debian/c
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416887: fixed in libapache-mod-acct 0.5-25
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420516: fixed in gpe-todo 0.56-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:57:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Hi Martin
On 4/26/07, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gordon, can you check if LUKS still doesn't work under heavy load with
2.6.21 (I can give you .debs if you want)?
Unfortunately, I can still trigger the problem, although instead of
cryptsetup asking me for the passphrase three
Several packages need rebuilds for the libdevmapper1.02 transition. Note
this is making debootstrap fail.
Thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgij.so
> > > file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgcj.so
> > > file does not exist:
> > > /usr/lib/j
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> reassign 421301 gcj-4.1,libgcj7-dev
Bug#421301: should conflict against "old" java-gcj-compat-dev
Bug reassigned from package `gcj-4.1' to `gcj-4.1,libgcj7-dev'.
>
End of message, st
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:42:55 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #419888,
regarding asterisk-app-fax: Doesn't work with Asterisk 1.4.x
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) Steve Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:34:35 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #416774,
regarding FTBFS: Doesn't work with asterisk 1.4
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) Armin Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
(NB: If you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 421242 xmltex
Bug#421242: system run out of memory while building formats
Bug reassigned from package `texlive-base-bin' to `xmltex'.
> forcemerge 421242 419987
Bug#421242: system run out of memory while building formats
Bug#419987: configurat
reassign xmltex
forcemerge 421242 419987
thanks
Rafal Czlonka wrote:
> Ralf Stubner wrote:
>> Do you have xmltex installed? If yes, then this is a (well known and
>> often
>> reported) problem in xmltex. Solution: Remove xmltex, install
>> texlive-base-bin, reinstall xmltex.
>
> Thanks for the tip
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 09:28:42AM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 12:50:07PM -0500, Jason Kraftcheck wrote:
> > Your patch seems to work fine. Builds and runs w/ no problems. After
> > about 24 hours, memory use (vsize) has remained around 1MB.
> Hmm, do I really need to ke
Hi,
the gcc bug that made kdegraphics FTBFS has been fixed in
4.1.2-4. Please remove the workaround patch "99_djvu-alpha-hack.diff".
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
the gcc bug has been fixed in 4.1.2-4. Please remove the
31_pdftex_gcc_ICE-on-alpha workaround patch.
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: pida
Version: 0.4.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (1001, 'testing'), (101, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.20
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=e
Package: xpenguins-applet
Version: 2.1.1-3.1
Followup-For: Bug #364590
This bug also exists in the current testing.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Loca
Package: gnome-hearts
Version: 0.1.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
Starting gnome-hearts systematically yields this:
**Error**: Couldn't recognize the image file format for file
'/usr/share/pixmaps/gnome-games-common/cards/bonded.svg'
and a dialog not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity #413564 grave
Bug#413564: gnome-system-tools: crash of users-admin when trying to add user
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> thanks.
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> This is clearly grave, and should be fixed for
Package: cdebootstrap
Version: 0.3.19
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
cdebootstrap fails on installing packages, because
update-rc.d from sysv-rc is not found:
# cdebootstrap --debug --variant=buildd sid sid-chroot
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian
D: Init suite sid
D: Exec
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:14:28 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This appears to have been a glibc bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Thorsten Glaser writes:
> Why is that library gone and/or how is ProPolice SSP in gcc 4.1+ then
> supposed to work without it?
>From /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1-base/changelog.Debian.gz:
,
| gcc-4.1 (4.1.1-11) unstable; urgency=low
|
| [...]
| * Only build the libssp package, if the target libc
Package: debootstrap
Version: 0.3.3.3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Debootstrap fails when it tries to mount proc:
# debootstrap --verbose --variant=buildd sid sid-chroot
http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian
I: Retrieving Release
I: Retrieving Packages
I: Validating Packages
Package: binutils
Version: 2.17cvs20070426-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Fails to build from source
binutils version 2.17cvs20070426-2 fails to build from source:
Automatic build of binutils_2.17cvs20070426-2 on cats by sbuild/arm 98
Build started at 20070427-2145
***
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 421162
Bug#421162: gcc-4.1: libssp0 is gone, several packages depend on it
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> severity 421249 no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 421341 confirmed
Bug#421341: FTBFS: Something wrong with gcjh/classpath/something
Tags were: sid
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:02:35 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328039: fixed in varkon 1.18A-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:02:35 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328039: fixed in varkon 1.18A-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
tags 421341 confirmed
thanks
It is fully reproducible on powerpc with the same output.
Cheers,
--
.''`. Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :' :
`. `'` Free Software Developer
`- Unix Sys & Net Admin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: gfortran-4.1
Version: 4.1.2-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
It seems that the /usr/lib/libgfortran.so symlink to
/usr/lib/libgfortran.so.1 is missing. I assume it belongs in
gfortran-4.1 since it has the .a files an replaces libgfortran1-dev.
I think it's also missing a dependency on libgfortr
tags 421341 sid
thanks
Hi Sami,
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 07:39:45AM +0300, Sami Liedes wrote:
>Package: pdftk
>Version: 1.40-2
>Severity: serious
>Justification: no longer builds from source
>
>I don't know whose bug this is, pdftk's (by possibly setting wrong
>classpath? I don't know) or gcj's or
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 421341 sid
Bug#421341: FTBFS: Something wrong with gcjh/classpath/something
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 12:50:07PM -0500, Jason Kraftcheck wrote:
> Your patch seems to work fine. Builds and runs w/ no problems. After
> about 24 hours, memory use (vsize) has remained around 1MB.
Hmm, do I really need to keep it running that long to notice?
I ran it for a short period in a s
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 01:51:39PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 01:43:25PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > After the upgrade to etch, I found myself generating mails with the wrong
> > > headers.
> >
> > Which package did you upgrade from?
>
> I can't remember exactly (and I
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 07:24:40PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> I have got a feeling that there is a good reason why debhelper does
> not automatically flag symlinks as conffiles, I guess you'd end up
> with wrong configuration-file-changed prompts.
I also have that feeling. However, policy doe
54 matches
Mail list logo
