Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.3
> # package is usable without this dep, so recommends is valid
> severity 419581 important
Bug#419581: xvfb-run: Should depend on xbase-clients: xauth command not found
Bug#419591: Plea
Package: pdftk
Version: 1.40-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
I don't know whose bug this is, pdftk's (by possibly setting wrong
classpath? I don't know) or gcj's or what, but anyway, for me pdftk
doesn't build:
-
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 03:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420041: fixed in edict-fpw 1.2.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: lilo
Version: 1:22.8-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Package needs to be recompiled against libdevmapper1.02.1.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Package: cryptsetup
Version: 2:1.0.4+svn26-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Needs a binNMU so as to link against libdevmapper1.02.1.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture:
Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417019: fixed in lurker 2.1-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
edict_doc was removed from edict package in version
2007.02.09-1. Thus, in order to build, this package will have to
either supply it itself or do without.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: linux-image-2.6-686
Version: 2.6.20-3
Severity: critical
Hello
I've an laptop hp compaq nx8220 with intel ich6 chipset.
When the boot prozess starts, my cpu fan will be disabled until the acpi
modul is loaded or the acpid starts.
Normaly the time is short enough so i reach "only" 75°C (a
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419310: fixed in ginspector 20050529-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
tags 419310 + patch pending
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my ginspector 20050529-1.1 NMU.
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier
diff -u ginspector-20050529/debian/changelog ginspector-20050529/debian/changelog
--- ginspector-20050529/debian/changelog
+++ ginspector-20050529/debian/changelog
@@
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 419310 + patch pending
Bug#419310: Switch to dh_gtkmodules for the gtk 2.10 transition
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:47:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#421168: avahi: avahi packages
depend on removed libssp0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419299: fixed in gtk2-engines-magicchicken 1.1.1-7.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419296: fixed in gtk2-engines-cleanice 2.4.0-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 419348 pending
Bug#419348: subversion: rare data loss / repository corruption bug
Tags were: pending
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419300: fixed in qtpixmap 0.28-1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 419300 + patch pending
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my qtpixmap 0.28-1.2 NMU.
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier
diff -u qtpixmap-0.28/debian/changelog qtpixmap-0.28/debian/changelog
--- qtpixmap-0.28/debian/changelog
+++ qtpixmap-0.28/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+qtpixmap (0.28
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 419300 + patch pending
Bug#419300: Switch to dh_gtkmodules for the gtk 2.10 transition
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 419348 pending
Bug#419348: subversion: rare data loss / repository corruption bug
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
tags 419299 + patch pending
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my gtk2-engines-magicchicken 1.1.1-7.1 NMU.
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier
diff -u gtk2-engines-magicchicken-1.1.1/debian/control gtk2-engines-magicchicken-1.1.1/debian/control
--- gtk2-engines-magicchicken-1.1.1/debian/control
++
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 419299 + patch pending
Bug#419299: Switch to dh_gtkmodules for the gtk 2.10 transition
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 419296 + patch
Bug#419296: Switch to dh_gtkmodules for the gtk 2.10 transition
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
tags 419296 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my gtk2-engines-cleanice 2.4.0-1.1 NMU.
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier
diff -u gtk2-engines-cleanice-2.4.0/debian/control gtk2-engines-cleanice-2.4.0/debian/control
--- gtk2-engines-cleanice-2.4.0/debian/control
+++ gtk2-engines-cleanice-2.4
Ralf Stubner wrote:
> Do you have xmltex installed? If yes, then this is a (well known and often
> reported) problem in xmltex. Solution: Remove xmltex, install
> texlive-base-bin, reinstall xmltex.
Thanks for the tip mate.
Regards,
--
rjc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> package gtk2-engines-cleanice
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gtk2-engines-cleanice
> tags 419296 + pending
Bug#419296: Switch to dh_gtkmodules for the gtk 2.10 transition
Tags were:
Hi,
The version in etch is still vulnerable. I have patched it for local
use. Hope the diff below helps. I used the two patches from
http://secunia.com/advisories/24886/ :
http://www.lighttpd.net/assets/2007/4/13/lighttpd-1.4.x_crlf_parsing_dos.patch
http://www.lighttpd.net/assets/2007/4/13/l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Richte java-gcj-compat-dev ein (1.0.65-10) ...
> file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgij.so
> file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgcj.so
> file does not exist:
> /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgij.so
> > file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgcj.so
> > file does not exist:
> > /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/li
Package: gnat-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-22
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable (uninstallable)
Could you please upload GNAT 4.1.2 to unstable ASAP? As it stands,
cpp-4.1's conflict with gnat-4.1 (<= 4.1.1-22) makes gnat-4.1
uninstallable on systems that don't still have suitably old
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:17:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420620: fixed in why 2.03.dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Hi Elemer
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 07:16:13PM +0200, Nagy Elemer Karoly wrote:
>
> Dear Debian,
>
> Leaving this package out from Etch maked my life considerebly different.
> I had no idea how to apply the vserver patches later found by
> cat /usr/src/kernel-patches/all//2.6.18/debian/seri
Package: myspell-de-de,hunspell-de-de
Version: 20051113-8
Severity: serious
This is a dummy bug to prevent this entering testing without OOo 2.2
as it would break german spellchecking for OOo in testing (as iit won't
be installable in testing together with OOo and bitney doesn't catch that)
-- Sy
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> tags 419972 unreproducible
Bug#419972: sylpheed: ..spam spoof spoofs html redering, puts "real" Paypal at
armordolls.it
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
>
End of m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> severity 419972 important
Bug#419972: sylpheed: ..spam spoof spoofs html redering, puts "real" Paypal at
armordolls.it
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
>
End of message,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
clone 421301 -1
severity -1 important
retitle -1 needs update for new gcj-4.1
reassign -1 java-gcj-compat-dev
thanks
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> java-gcj-compat-dev does excpects it on another path:
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 2007-04-26 13:50
> /usr/lib
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 421301 -1
Bug#421301: should conflict against "old" java-gcj-compat-dev
Bug 421301 cloned as bug 421303.
> severity -1 important
Bug#421303: should conflict against "old" java-gcj-compat-dev
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> retitle -
Package: gcj-4.1
Version: 4.1.2-4
Severity: serious
(as already mentioned on IRC).
the new gcj-4.1 apparently changed location of jawt (and other sos):
libgcj7-1-awt: /usr/lib/gcj-4.1-71/libjawt.so
java-gcj-compat-dev does excpects it on another path:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 2007-04-26 13:50
Package: ecj-gcj
Version: 3.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
(as already told on IRC)
While installing the new gcj (sorry, german):
$ sudo dpkg -i *ecj*deb
(Lese Datenbank ... 292312 Dateien und Verzeichnisse sind derzeit installiert.)
Vorbereiten zum Ersetzen von ecj 3.2.2-1 (durch ecj_3.2.2-1_all
Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
Version: 1.0.65-10
Severity: serious
Hi,
Richte java-gcj-compat-dev ein (1.0.65-10) ...
file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgij.so
file does not exist: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.1-1.4.2.0/lib/libgcj.so
file does not exist: /usr/lib/
Your patch seems to work fine. Builds and runs w/ no problems. After
about 24 hours, memory use (vsize) has remained around 1MB.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> tags 421015 moreinfo
Bug#421015: openafs - module not buildable against 2.6.18-4, 2.6.20-1
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
P
Dear Debian,
Leaving this package out from Etch maked my life considerebly different.
I had no idea how to apply the vserver patches later found by
cat /usr/src/kernel-patches/all//2.6.18/debian/series/* | grep vserver
after doing
apt-get install linux-tree-2.6.18
and a
Rafal Czlonka wrote:
> Package: texlive-base-bin
> Version: 2007-5
> Severity: critical
>
> Hi,
> When the postinst script runs and it comes to 'Building formats', after
> several minutes of doing so, the system runs out of memory. The process
> "eats" all the available memory, both phisical (512MB
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:32:01 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420977: fixed in hpodder 0.99.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: gij-4.1
Version: 4.1.2-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
I'm getting this error:
Unpacking gcj-4.1 (from .../gcj-4.1_4.1.2-4_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libgcj7-0.
Unpacking libgcj7-0 (from .../libgcj7-0_4.1.1-20_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/home/buildd/build/
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 09:15 +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 26.04.2007, 20:09 -0700 schrieb Joe Wreschnig:
> I agree that the fix for this bug was not at all complete and this special
> case should be handled too. Is "file://" the only URL that causes a problem
> for
> you or is
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421202: fixed in happs 0.8.8+darcs20070329-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Hello,
apparently the module gnuplot_x11
is built correctly in /build/buildd/gnuplot-4.2.0/src but it is then not moved
into its supposed final destination /usr/lib/gnuplot
I know very little of ia64, and have no access to a ia64 machine to experiment
here, but for anybody even vaguely famil
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 09:49:58AM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> If you mean downgrading, then yes: downgrading libghc6-haxml-dev from
Oh! I looked a bit too quickly and saw 1.7. But the fact remains
that haskell libraries are a bit particular about the versions of
their dependencies. I uplo
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> James Troup a écrit :
>> Package: libc6
>> Version: 2.5-4
>> Severity: serious
>>
>> | Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.6.ds1-11 (using
>> .../archives/libc6_2.5-4_arm.deb) ...
>> | Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
>> | dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396132: fixed in gtk-gnutella 0.96.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396132: fixed in gtk-gnutella 0.96.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397048: fixed in gtk-gnutella 0.96.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396132: fixed in gtk-gnutella 0.96.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396132: fixed in gtk-gnutella 0.96.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396132: fixed in gtk-gnutella 0.96.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 417649 + unreproducible
Bug#417649: 100% cpu utilization with kdelibs 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-8
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> severity 417649 normal
Bug#417649: 100% cpu utilization with kdelibs 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-8
Severity set to `no
Ok, I found this
gcc-4.1 (4.1.1-11) unstable; urgency=low
* The "Our priority are our users, remove the documentation!" release.
[Matthias Klose]
* Only build the libssp package, if the target libc doesn't provide
ssp support.
in the gcc changelogs. Should have checked before
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:19:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421249: apt-get install libssp0 fails, apt-get -b source
libssp0 does not build package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Package: libssp0
Version: 4.1.1-21
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
*** Please type your report below this line ***
The libssp0 package seems to be broken and does not build from source.
# apt-get install libssp0
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree.
Package: gprolog
Version: 1.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Seems like you need to update your package because of the
tetex->texlive transition:
> Automatic build of gprolog_1.3.0-2 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 0.53
...
> LaTeX2e <2005/12/01>
> Babel and hyphenation patterns for english, usenglishmax, dumyl
Package: prelude-manager
Version: 0.9.6.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
apt installation shows:
Richte prelude-manager ein (0.9.6.1-1) ...
Starting Prelude Manager: prelude-managerprelude-client: error
initializing prelude-client: could not open
'/etc/prelude/profile/pr
Package: texlive-base-bin
Version: 2007-5
Severity: critical
Hi,
When the postinst script runs and it comes to 'Building formats', after
several minutes of doing so, the system runs out of memory. The process
"eats" all the available memory, both phisical (512MB RAM) and virtual
(1GB swap). After
* Lennert Buytenhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-27 11:56]:
> I don't see this on EABI, so I suspect that it is an old-ABI
> alignment/padding issue in glibc.
Yeah, it actually got fixed in -4.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:02:36 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421199: fixed in binutils 2.17cvs20070426-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 09:37:22AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> After upgrading my ARM sid chroot to current sid, I get the following
> when running apt-get source. Is this a bug in apt or libc6?
>
> (sid)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src$ apt-get source texlive-bin
> Reading package lists... Done
> B
Hi
on a fresh Install (i backported asterisk 1:1.4.3~dfsg-1 to etch)
the asterisk user is still not created.
Problem is, the script /usr/share/asterisk/bin/asterisk_fix
has no executable bit set and asterisk-config.postinst
does check this:
configure)
if [ -x /usr/share/asterisk/bin/
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421167: fixed in gstreamer0.10 0.10.12-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package freefem
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: freefem
> tags 421071 upstream patch
Bug#421071: FTBFS: ! LaTeX Error: File `fancyheadings.sty' not found.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream, patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please co
package freefem
tags 421071 upstream patch
thanks
* Jérémy Bobbio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-26 11:04]:
> Package: freefem
> Version: 3.5.8-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> Hi!
>
> freefem currently fails to build from source in sid [1]:
>
> [snip]
>
>
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 10:20 +0300, Kari Pahula wrote:
>
> I guess I should use a versioned dependency on libghc6-haxml-dev...
> But in the meantime, does upgrading your libghc6-haxml-dev package fix
> this issue?
If you mean downgrading, then yes: downgrading libghc6-haxml-dev from
version 1.17
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 09:05:27AM +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> Setting up libghc6-happs-dev (0.8.8+darcs20070329-1) ...
> Reading package info from stdin ... done.
> ghc-pkg: dependency HaXml-1.13.2 doesn't exist (use --force to override)
> Versions of packages libghc6-happs-dev depends on:
>
Package: matanza
Version: 0.13-3.3
Severity: serious
This package fails to build because of the tetex->texlive transition.
You need a build-depends on texlive-extra-utils.
> Automatic build of matanza_0.13-3.3 on coconut0 by sbuild/ia64 0.49
...
> creating ./config.status
> creating Makefile
> cr
Package: typo3
Version: 4.0.2+debian-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After installing typo3 via aptitude I get in my browser:
Internal Server Error
The logfile says:
mod_rewrite: maximum number of internal redirects reached. Assuming
configuration error. Use
"RewriteO
reassign 421167 gstreamer0.10
thanks
Am Donnerstag, den 26.04.2007, 20:09 -0700 schrieb Joe Wreschnig:
> On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 23:21 +0200, Martin wrote:
> > Package: quodlibet
> > Version: 0.23.1-1
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 421167 gstreamer0.10
Bug#421167: quodlibet: fails to start, claiming 'filesrc' cannot be found
Bug reassigned from package `quodlibet' to `gstreamer0.10'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bu
Your message dated Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:04:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line nscd: not installable in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Package: libghc6-happs-dev
Version: 0.8.8+darcs20070329-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
here is the problem:
Setting up libghc6-happs-dev (0.8.8+darcs20070329-1) ...
Reading package info from stdin ... done.
ghc-pkg: dependency HaXml-1.13.2 doesn't exist (use --for
78 matches
Mail list logo
