Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> found 365201 0.9.16.010-1
Bug#365201: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Bug marked as found in version 0.9.16.010-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please con
Hello,
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 02:14:26PM +0100, Tobias Gruetzmacher wrote:
> When using xcdroast with cdrecord/wodim 1.0~pre5, xcdroast crashes with
> a SEGFAULT when doing a "cdrecord -scanbus". See the attached patch for
> a fix.
Isn't this a duplicate of bug #390174?
--
Steve Langasek
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 22:14:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:58:58 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#258841: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 398125 +pending
Bug#398125: gaim-librvp will not run or build with gaim 2.0.0beta5
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
tags 398125 +pending
quit
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 04:33:31PM -0500, Ari Pollak wrote:
> With the upload of gaim 2.0.0beta5, gaim-librvp will not build or run
> due to a gaim ABI change. Attached is a patch which will fix the
> problem.
Splendid timing for it. Thanks for the warning, I've integra
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:02:27 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396055: fixed in unionfs 1.3.20061029.0124+debian-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
here is a patch for version 2.0.0beta4, 2.0.0beta5, perphaps it has
secundary effects..
Thanks.
Javi.
--- gtkblist.c 2006-11-12 04:23:09.0 +0100
+++ ../gtkblist.c 2006-11-12 04:20:08.0 +0100
@@ -2847,7 +2847,7 @@
GString *key = g_string_sized_new(16);
const
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 19:17:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#398072: fixed in bitcollider 0.4.0-3.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hi,
The segfault I hit was due to incorrect error handling in sane. When that is
fixed, I get a scanner error "incorrect window". I have no idea where it
comes from (perhaps the scanner itself), grep doesn't find the message in the
source (neither in the module, nor in sane).
Anyway, I think th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 396055 + patch
Bug#396055: unionfs-source - error: sioq.h: No such file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tags 396055 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Please apply attached patch.
I think svenl's post above does not apply here, I saw the two files in the
orig.tar.gz of current package with my own eyes.
Kel.
diff -u unionfs-1.3.20061029.0124+debian/debian/rules unionfs-1.3.20061029.0124+debian/debian/rules
--- u
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 09:23:05 +0100, Fabien Chereau wrote:
> >checking for FT_Init_FreeType in -lfreetype... no
> >configure: error: freetype library not found
> Obviously there is a dependency problem with freetype..
Adding libfreetype6-dev to Build-Depends fixes the problem in my sid
chroot.
Fo
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 12:00:42AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> I spent some time on this bug and so far I can tell that the infinit
> loop is located at Mail/Mbox/MessageParser/Grep.pm, line 373. This is
> code from the libmail-mbox-messageparser-perl package so this bug
> might actually belo
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 02:39:59AM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > Ah, note that libsvga1-dev is only available on i386 and amd64, so this
> > package will now FTBFS on all other archs where it's currently built. For a
> > package named *x*oscope, I don't think SVGAlib support is the most important
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 03:11:44AM +0200, Tuukka Hastrup wrote:
> Hi,
> I had a look at this bug and one simple fix you could at least do is
> switch the possibly endless loops into an fmod function call. This would
> reduce the severity of this bug significantly.
I'm not sure I agree that this
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 12:03:06PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Package: bitcollider-plugins
> Version: 0.4.0-3.2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> For whatever reason, bitcollider-plugins has a hard-coded dependency
> on bitcollider (= 0.4.0-3), which is no longer i
Package: systemimager-boot-i386-standard
Version: 3.6.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After setting up partitions, I see:
Load device mapper driver (for LVM).
modprobe: relocation error: modprobe: symbol create_module, version
GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 w
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 05:21:09PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 01:39:23AM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
>
> > Hi again Steffen,
>
> > On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 12:42:03AM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > > This does not seem an arch problem. I have reproduced the problem
> >
Package: systemimager-server
Version: 3.6.3-2
Severity: serious
This data should go under /var. The package shouldn't be creating new
directories under /usr/share at runtime.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architectur
Hi,
I had a look at this bug and one simple fix you could at least do is
switch the possibly endless loops into an fmod function call. This would
reduce the severity of this bug significantly.
--- src/weapon/gnu.cpp.orig 2006-11-12 01:08:13.0 +0200
+++ src/weapon/gnu.cpp 2006-11-12
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:32:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397620: fixed in gnome-speech 1:0.3.10-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 07:19:27PM +0100, e-t172 wrote:
> # aptitude install php5-xcache
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> Reading extended state information
> Initializing package states... Done
> Reading task descriptions... Done
> Building tag database... Done
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:14:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363620: fixed in multisync 0.82-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
tags 398058 etch-ignore
thanks
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 05:49:03PM +0200, Teemu Hukkanen wrote:
> Package: nhfsstone
> Version: 1:1.0.10-4
> Severity: serious
> Package copyright claims that all the software is under GPL, however,
> utils/nhfsstone/DISCLAIMER, as referenced by utils/nhfsstone/READ
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:14:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363435: fixed in multisync 0.82-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:14:05 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385423: fixed in multisync 0.82-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:07:56 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397788: fixed in gaim 1:2.0.0+beta5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:14:20 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396240: fixed in poker-network 1.0.30-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:14:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363435: fixed in multisync 0.82-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:14:05 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385423: fixed in multisync 0.82-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:14:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364379: fixed in pcmanx-gtk2 0.3.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:14:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376970: fixed in multisync 0.82-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:07:34 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397599: fixed in exult 1.2-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:15:32 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397851: fixed in upstart 0.2.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:07:56 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397788: fixed in gaim 1:2.0.0+beta5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:14:05 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392178: fixed in multisync 0.82-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:14:05 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392426: fixed in multisync 0.82-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:14:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376970: fixed in multisync 0.82-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:07:56 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397593: fixed in gaim 1:2.0.0+beta5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:14:05 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389851: fixed in multisync 0.82-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 398058 etch-ignore
Bug#398058: nhfsstone: software is non-free
There were no tags set.
Tags added: etch-ignore
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:14:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363620: fixed in multisync 0.82-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Fix for the RC bugs, plus changes to fix the package failing to
*re*build correctly. I'm about to upload this.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Getting a SCSI chain working is perfectly simple if you remember that there
must be exactly three t
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:14:05 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386199: fixed in multisync 0.82-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 398066
Bug#398066: nexuiz: Segfaults on amd64
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Knut Auvor Grythe <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 398089 gaim
Bug#398089: lstphost=pop-estudiante.uam.es: it crashes at start up, function
gaim_gtk_blist_get_status_icon
Warning: Unknown package 'lstphost'
Bug reassigned from package `lstphost=pop-estudiante.uam.es' to `gaim'.
> --
Stopping
Package: gaim-librvp
Version: 0.9.5-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
With the upload of gaim 2.0.0beta5, gaim-librvp will not build or run
due to a gaim ABI change. Attached is a patch which will fix the
problem.
diff -ur librvp-0.9.5.orig/rvp.c librvp-0.9.5/rvp.c
--- librvp-0.9.5.orig/rvp.c 2006-11-
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 07:19:08PM +0100, Bruno Kleinert wrote:
> i cannot reproduce the error on my athlon 64 machine. (also i've got
> only nvidia cards around) and i don't know about existing bugs on amd64
> concerning nexuiz.
Okay, there goes my 64 bit cleanness-theory ;-)
> maybe it's again
Hi,
I am the maintainer of nfs-utils in Debian GNU/Linux; as part of the package
we also distribute nhfsstone (in line with upstream). It has recently come to
my attention that nhfsstone is distributed under a different license than the
rest of nfs-utils (which is straight GPL):
You may copy Le
Stephen Gran wrote:
> After some discussion on IRC, it appears that you should include the
> debian revision in the conflicts/replaces/etc versioning. So instead of
> << 1:07, use << 1:07-2.
Ah, thanks for the hint. I'll try it tomorrow and if it works I'll
update the wiki and upload as soon as p
Package: yasr
Version: 0.6.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 9.1
# dpkg -L yasr | grep aclocaldir
/@aclocaldir@
/@aclocaldir@/glibc21.m4
/@aclocaldir@/lib-prefix.m4
/@aclocaldir@/ulonglong.m4
/@aclocaldir@/inttypes_h.m4
/@aclocaldir@/isc-posix.m4
/@aclocaldir@/uintmax_t.m4
/@aclocaldir@
Hi Øystein,
the latest version in unstable (3.0.dfsg.1-8) detects evolution-dev's version.
Would you mind making a binNMU for experimental?
thanks,
-Pascal
--
Homepage (http://organact.mine.nu)
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org)
École de technologie supérieure (http://www.etsmtl.ca)
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>
> Perhaps try replacing ntdetect.com and ntldr with the versions that came
> with an earlier Vista beta? For reference see:
> http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windows.server.setup/browse_frm/thread/7944a6046ab2f6ac/24312e94802d19
This one time, at band camp, Bastian Venthur said:
> Stephen Gran wrote:
> > After some discussion on IRC, it appears that you should include the
> > debian revision in the conflicts/replaces/etc versioning. So instead of
> > << 1:07, use << 1:07-2.
>
> Ah, thanks for the hint. I'll try it tomorr
Hi,
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> I had another look and used F6->F8->Safe Mode with Command Prompt. In
> the attached screenshot you can see that it stops after it loaded
> crcdisk.sys.
>
> Google says other people experience the same.
Thanks, I've checked some Google post
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:33:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381625: multisync0.90 - FTBFS: Ships i386 binaries
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
> Would you be willing to help do this, find replacement icons, etc.? The
> rest of the team is pretty much swamped right now, so help would be
> much appreciated, especially with the Etch freeze coming. I have
> kde-svn access, so I can ensure that good fixes make 3.5.5.
> Thanks,
> Christopher M
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 397862 important
Bug#397862: openafs doesn't work with 2.6.18 kernel
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> tags 397862 unreproducible
Bug#397862: openafs doesn't work with 2.6.18 kernel
Tags were: patch
Tags added: unreproducible
> thank
severity 397862 important
tags 397862 unreproducible
thanks
Alex Romosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: openafs-modules-source
> Version: 1.4.2-2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: patch
> i think the first bug report got mangled, so i am trying again.
> using the lates openafs-module i get:
>
Subject: banshee: Banshee frozen after startup
Package: banshee
Version: 0.10.12-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Some time after startup Banshee becomes entirely frozen.
Running Banshee from console I get following messages
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 396864 pending
Bug#396864: phpunit2: FTBFS on amd64: memory size exhausted
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 398034 serious
Bug#398034: gaim: dies within minutes of being lauched
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> tags 398034 +fixed-upstream
Bug#398034: gaim: dies within minutes of being lauched
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-ups
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 397904 important
Bug#397904: php5-mysql: apache2 segfaults on php shutdown in zm_startup_mysql
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> tags 397904 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#397904: php5-mysql: apache2 segfaults on php shutdown in zm_start
severity 397904 important
tags 397904 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
(christian, i'm cc'ing you on this php bug because it may have to do
with libmysqlclient in experimental)
On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 17:26 +0100, Antoni Villalonga wrote:
>
> Finaly I solved the problem downgrading libmysqlclient15o
Package: php5-xcache
Version: 1.0-4.1
Severity: grave
# aptitude install php5-xcache
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
Building tag database... Done
The following p
This one time, at band camp, Knut Auvor Grythe wrote:
> Package: nexuiz
> Version: 2.0-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> At the end of loading a level in nexuiz, the game segfaults. The
> segfault does not occur when running the game in a 32-bit chroot on the
> s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.25
> retitle 352210 websvn: fills up disk
Bug#352210: websvn: Temporary files not compliant to FSH
Changed Bug title.
(By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.)
>
End of message,
Package: libpfm3-3.2-dev
Version: 3.2.060926-1
Severity: grave
This backage is nunseable on mips due to missing headers. From
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=systemtap;ver=0.0.2006-1;arch=mips;stamp=1163266944
if mips-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -DBINDIR='"/usr/bin"'
-D
_syscall macroses defined only for __KERNEL__ in unistd.h. A
workaround like for i386 helps to build it, but I do not know how it
is correct. The code has been taken from unistd.h
diff --git a/src/base/linux_syscall_support.h b/src/base/linux_syscall_support.h
index 0dfdd8d..41b3b17 100644
--- a/s
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 02:11:24PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 05:59:07PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> ...
> > > Option 3)
> > > * Set "Architecture: alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel
> > > powerpc sparc"
> > > * Ask ftp-master for removal of pac
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 06:14:17PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Attached is the diff for my apache2 2.2.3-3.1 NMU, currently in
> DELAYED/3-day.
Andreas Barth already uploaded his own -3.1 NMU; IOW, please disregard this
diff, as it won't ever reach the archive.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 09:17:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397288: fixed in dbconfig-common 1.8.29
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 352210 1.61-19
Bug#352210: websvn: Temporary files not compliant to FSH
Bug marked as found in version 1.61-19.
> tags 352210 + patch
Bug#352210: websvn: Temporary files not compliant to FSH
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
> owner !
Unknown c
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 09:02:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#338855: fixed in crosshurd 1.7.26
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: kmail
Version: 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: security patch
Justification: makes program unusable because of input from internet
When recieving a email with special formatted email headers, kmail locks
up in 15-30 minutes without responding. Killing is possible, but kmail
has
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 396265 + patch
Bug#396265: apache2: mod_proxy_ajp connection reuse bug
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Package: bitcollider-plugins
Version: 0.4.0-3.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
For whatever reason, bitcollider-plugins has a hard-coded dependency
on bitcollider (= 0.4.0-3), which is no longer in unstable; even if
you remember to keep the dependency current in your (extr
tags 396265 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my apache2 2.2.3-3.1 NMU, currently in
DELAYED/3-day.
diff -Nru /tmp/vWCnuPvxj3/apache2-2.2.3/debian/changelog
/tmp/kFoWiQ4qgN/apache2-2.2.3/debian/changelog
--- /tmp/vWCnuPvxj3/apache2-2.2.3/debian/changelog 2006-11-11
18:14:02.0
found 352210 1.61-19
tags 352210 + patch
owner !
thanks
I'm sorry to say that 352210 still exists partly in the current
version: Now the system temp dir is used but the hard disk fills up
until it's full.
Digging through the php source and doing some tests it seems that the
code in dl.php that cr
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006, Julien Danjou wrote:
> There's one, but it's several minutes, and it print that the build has
> been killed.
>
> I suggest to just close this bug. ;)
Oh =) And yeah, I kind of closed the bug a minute ago.
Hanna Ollila
--
The early bird catches the worm,
but the second mouse
Package: nexuiz
Version: 2.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
At the end of loading a level in nexuiz, the game segfaults. The
segfault does not occur when running the game in a 32-bit chroot on the
same machine. I believe this suggests that nexuiz is not 64-bit clean.
I
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 03:10:49PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> could you please try the attached patch (patch -p1) and tell me if
> successfully compiles on hppa then.
Seems to work, yes.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 04:18:15AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> #396716: irda-utils: fails to install,
> It has been closed by Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>* Added '-e' to sysctl calls so that a bad kernel/package
> configuration won't stop the package
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 18:25:10 +0200 (EET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line freeloader: FTBFS: error: failed to find required module
gnome.ui
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 05:18:51PM +0100, Julien Valroff wrote:
> I have never been able to reproduce this bug. Importing gnome.ui module
> takes a quite long time on my machine (though somewhat powerful), maybe
> your build script has a timeout somewhere?
There's one, but it's several minutes, an
Yup, rebuilding again clean does work. This suggests the clean target
in the package is not as clean as it could be, of course. But that's a
separate bug. :-(
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
< sladen> I actually stayed in a hotel and arrived to f
Le samedi 11 novembre 2006 à 16:39 +0100, Julien Danjou a écrit :
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 05:15:16PM +0200, Hanna Ollila wrote:
> >
> > Hello Julien,
> >
> > I have a problem with repeating the bug. I don't see the bug you describe
> > when building with pbuilder, and it builds without problems
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Hello,
> # The current status of this bug in the bts is broken somehow, it is
> # listed as open in unstable curently. It was
> # a) reported against libsasl2
> # b) fixed in cyrus-sasl-2.1 2.1.22-0~pre01
> # c) marked manually as "found in 2.1.22-1"
En/na sean finney ha escrit:
> On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 14:37 +0100, Antoni Villalonga wrote:
>> I'm using mysql from debian experimental :S
>
> hmm... it's possible that there are unpublished ABI differences
> between unstable<->experimental libmysqlclient, as mysql every now and
> then accidentally
Details of the vulnerability is described in the advisory
(os2a_1008.txt) attached with this mail.
Thanks,
OS2A
ELOG Web Logbook Remote Denial of Service Vulnerability
OS2A ID: OS2A_1008 Status:
10/31/2006 Issue Discovered
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 397297 0.3-3
Bug#397297: obexpushd: executes shell commands (remote exploitable)
Bug marked as not found in version 0.3-3.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 07:47:18 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396498: fixed in mesa 6.5.1-0.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: nhfsstone
Version: 1:1.0.10-4
Severity: serious
Package copyright claims that all the software is under GPL, however,
utils/nhfsstone/DISCLAIMER, as referenced by utils/nhfsstone/README,
states:
---
You may copy Legato nhfsstone source, object code and related
documentation as necessary,
Steve,
For me it's built ok if you install libpop-dev before building (not
after has found the problem)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 05:15:16PM +0200, Hanna Ollila wrote:
>
> Hello Julien,
>
> I have a problem with repeating the bug. I don't see the bug you describe
> when building with pbuilder, and it builds without problems. Could you
> provide the information how to repeat the bug?
I cannot reprodu
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 03:33:06PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to Thread 47388434000368 (LWP 18300)]
> 0x00430852 in GET_INT () at pe/pe_vm.cpp:407
> 407 return (*curvm->ip++).u8;
FWIW, I believe this crash is a red h
Hello Julien,
I have a problem with repeating the bug. I don't see the bug you describe
when building with pbuilder, and it builds without problems. Could you
provide the information how to repeat the bug?
Regards,
Hanna Ollila
--
The early bird catches the worm,
but the second mouse gets the
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:33:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397716: fixed in update-manager 0.42.2ubuntu22-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Looking into this bug more, it looked like a simple build-dep on
libpopt-dev would make all the difference. That fixes the issue here,
but it then goes on further to fail building drivers:
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/home/steve/debian/bsp/gnome-speech-0.3.10/drivers/festival'
Making all in freett
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
