Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 391243 sid
Bug#391243: Uninstallable due to unavailable gaim (<1:2.0)
Tags were: sid
Bug#390277: gaim-extendedprefs: uninstallable with gaim2.0
Tags added: sid
> tags 391244 sid
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 22:17:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390300: fixed in wbxml2 0.9.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Brian May wrote:
Warning: Wrong parameter count for class_exists() in
/usr/share/php/fpdf/fpdf.php on line 12
I replaced this condition with "if (true)" and not all I get is a blank
page. Hmmm
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:02:23 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385078: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Friday 06 October 2006 01:30, Joey Hess wrote:
> David Härdeman wrote:
> > Strange, it sounds familiar...oh yes...it's what I've been suggesting
> > all along [1]. So I think its safe to say that we fully agree.
>
> I'm not going to say anything more on this issue, except that I still
> think th
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:47:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389759: fixed in fbgetty 0.1.698-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 391251 sid
Bug#391251: Uninstallable due to unavailable libglib-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> tags 391257 sid
Bug#391257: Uninstallable due to unavailable libgli
Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:32:41 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390304: compiz --replace fails to launch
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 391253 sid
Bug#391253: Uninstallable due to unavailable pike7.6-dev (<= 7.6.87-99)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please co
Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:35:51 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388011: xserver-xorg.config needs /var/lib/x11 from
x11-common; .config scripts can't count on Pre-Depends
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 389429 important
Bug#389429: xserver-xorg: Crashes on startup after the upgrade to 7.1
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> severity 390630 important
Bug#390630: xorg hangs on logout when used with this driver
Severity set to `important'
tag 391291 patch
thanks
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Package: dokuwiki
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> DokuWiki can be exploited by malicious people to cause a DoS (Denial of
> Service) or potentially compromise a vulnerable system.
>
>
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:02:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391274: fixed in squashfs 1:3.1r2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: acl2
Version: 3.0.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #381477
AFAICT, the prior FTBFS was due to a gcl bug which has since been
fixed; as such, requeuing acl2 should resolve this bug.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 391236 sid
Bug#391236: Uninstallable due to unavailable libsvn0-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> tags 391242 sid
Bug#391242: Uninstallable due to unavailable gaim (
Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:32:41 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390304: compiz --replace fails to launch
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Ben Hutchings writes:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Package: sgt-puzzles
> > Version: 6844-2
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > trying to remove gcc-4.0 from etch; please use the default gcc version
> > (or 3.4, or 3.3).
>
> Please see #380455 and #380541, and note that the dependency is "gcc-4.0
> | gc
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: sgt-puzzles
> Version: 6844-2
> Severity: serious
>
> trying to remove gcc-4.0 from etch; please use the default gcc version
> (or 3.4, or 3.3).
Please see #380455 and #380541, and note that the dependency is "gcc-4.0
| gcc-3.3" anyway.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings --
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 391291 patch
Bug#391291: CVE-2006-509[89]: DokuWiki 2006-03-09e fixes security issues
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> forcemerge 389113 391231
Bug#389113: package ntp tries to overwrite /usr/sbin/ntpd which is in package
ntp-simple
Bug#391231: ntp: file conflict with ntp-simple
Bug#390586: ntp: brok
Package: ldap-account-manager
Version: 1.0.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When trying to access the page I get warnings like:
=== cut ===
Warning: Wrong parameter count for class_exists() in
/usr/share/php/fpdf/fpdf.php on line 12
Warning: session_start(): Cannot sen
Package: vlc
Version: 0.8.6-svn20061001.debian-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
In my computer, the latest vlc source package fails to build
unless libnotify is explicitly disabled in the debian/rules
file by, for example, adding the line "--disable-notify" to the
"v
David Härdeman wrote:
> Strange, it sounds familiar...oh yes...it's what I've been suggesting all
> along [1]. So I think its safe to say that we fully agree.
I'm not going to say anything more on this issue, except that I still
think that Kamion and my argument has merit, and if it's ignored now,
tags 391305 +patch
thanks
On 2006-10-05 15:33 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
OK. I have fixed the problem.
I don't really understand the details of this but changing inline to
__inline__ and asm to __asm__ makes it all build OK. All the other
arches except sh64 have __inline__ for thi
Hello,
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:25:18 +0200, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 23:59 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 05:20:38PM +0200, Jan Stedehouder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following problem. After upgrading from Debian Sarge to
Si
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 391305 +patch
Bug#391305: linux-kernel-headers: FTBFS on arm - complains about __32 t; in
include/asm/byteorder.h:21
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian b
Hi,
> > .58 fixes the issue with http-proxy, please try.
>
> This is what I get with .58 installed:
>
> # apt-get upgrade
> [..]
> 35 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 6 not upgraded.
> Need to get 0B/46.0MB of archives.
> After unpacking 824kB of additional disk space will be used.
>
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:04:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359861: fixed in libquicktime 1:0.9.10+debian-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:04:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323659: fixed in libquicktime 1:0.9.10+debian-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:06:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390157: fixed in maxima 5.10.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:04:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326462: fixed in libquicktime 1:0.9.10+debian-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:03:23 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381389: fixed in debhelper 5.0.38
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:04:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359863: fixed in libquicktime 1:0.9.10+debian-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:04:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391251: fixed in libquicktime 1:0.9.10+debian-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:04:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#205987: fixed in libquicktime 1:0.9.10+debian-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 389968 + fixed
Bug#389968: mailscanner: purging the package fails (ucf unavailable)
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:04:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359861: fixed in libquicktime 1:0.9.10+debian-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:04:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322640: fixed in libquicktime 1:0.9.10+debian-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:04:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326753: fixed in libquicktime 1:0.9.10+debian-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:07:49 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391235: fixed in vdr-plugin-mp3 0.9.15-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:03:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285693: fixed in entity 1.0.1-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:07:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390940: fixed in openafs 1.4.2~fc4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:03:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381389: fixed in debhelper 5.0.39
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.6.18-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
building fails with
cc -Wall -Werror -W -I
/root/linux-kernel-headers-2.6.18/testsuite/../debian/linux-kernel-headers/usr/include
-I /root/linux-kernel-headers-2.6.18/testsuite/../inclu
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:03:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391239: fixed in glib1.2 1.2.10-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:04:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359863: fixed in libquicktime 1:0.9.10+debian-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:03:34 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328154: fixed in entity 1.0.1-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:52:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391139: Uninstallable due to typo?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
tags 389968 patch
usertags 389968 supplied-patch
thanks
Hi,
I have prepared a little NMU patch which fixes the RC bug. As I am no DD
yet, I can not do an upload myself. The patch is attached.
Greetings Arjan
mailscanner (4.51.5-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Only cal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 389968 patch
Bug#389968: mailscanner: purging the package fails (ucf unavailable)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> usertags 389968 supplied-patch
Bug#389968: mailscanner: purging the package fails (ucf unavailable)
There were no usertag
Package: webmin
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Webmin in sarge is probably vulnerable to CVE-2006-4542:
Webmin before 1.296 and Usermin before 1.226 do not properly handle a
URL with a null ("%00") character, which allows remote attackers to
conduct cross-site
Package: kfreebsd-5
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Some security issues have been found in FreeBSD that probably affect
the Debian FreeBSD kernel:
CVE-2006-4304:
Buffer overflow in the sppp driver in FreeBSD 4.11 through 6.1, NetBSD
2.0 through 4.0 beta before
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 391063 patch
Bug#391063: dvipsk-ja: purging the package fails (update-texmf unavailable)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> usertags 391063 supplied-patch
Bug#391063: d
Package: dokuwiki
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
DokuWiki can be exploited by malicious people to cause a DoS (Denial of
Service) or potentially compromise a vulnerable system.
CVE-2006-5098:
lib/exec/fetch.php in DokuWiki before 2006-03-09e allows remote
attacke
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 361846 serious
Bug#361846: invalid assertion of copyright on contents of core.schema
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> tags 361846 etch-ignore
Bug#361846: invalid assertion of copyright on contents of core.schema
There were no tags
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:36:29AM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> Hi Moshe,
> it's not that serious problem.
> You can solve by simply doing a:
> # dpkg --force-overwrite -i
> /var/cache/apt/archives/apache2.2-common_2.2.3-1_i386.deb
Which can break your system in all kinds of other subtle ways...
Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:55:38 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line package build-depends on g++-4.0, which is not available on
hppa
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:09:06AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> it should have been made an empty package, without maintainer scripts,
> so that it could be purged, as it's superseeded with apache2.2-common.
Totally not an option. The entire justification for renaming apache2-common
to apach
Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:53:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line package build-depends on g++-4.0, which is not available on
hppa
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:36:29AM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
>> Hi Moshe,
>> it's not that serious problem.
>> You can solve by simply doing a:
>>
>> # dpkg --force-overwrite -i
>> /var/cache/apt/archives/apache2.2-common_2.2
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:11:04AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> So it's my recommendation to downgrade and "wontfix" this bug, since there's
> no way to fix apache2-common's postrm script after the fact without
> introducing a dummy package that re-breaks our dependency logic.
Oh, alternatively,
Package: squashfs
Version: 1:3.1r2-2
Severity: serious
trying to remove gcc-4.0 from etch; please use the default gcc version
(gcc-4.1-hppa64).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: sgt-puzzles
Version: 6844-2
Severity: serious
trying to remove gcc-4.0 from etch; please use the default gcc version
(or 3.4, or 3.3).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 391068 normal
Bug#391068: Can not be installed if texlive is installed
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> reassign 391068 texlive-latex-base,latex-ucs
Bug#391068: Can not be installed if texlive is installed
Bug reassigned from package `s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 391251 +pending
Bug#391251: Uninstallable due to unavailable libglib-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # hardware support bugs are not generally RC
> severity 391182 important
Bug#391182: debian-installer: Impossible to boot linux 2.6 i386 image on
Opteron (daily build 3 oct 2006 and d-i rc3 with 2.6 kernel)
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> t
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
create_tetex_formats --all --cnffile /etc/texmf/fmt.d/01tetex.cnf
I think that would help, too, at least with jadetex and friends.
>>>
>>> There's an other potential problem here. If a new tetex-base contains a
>>> change that requires the La
severity 391068 normal
reassign 391068 texlive-latex-base,latex-ucs
thanks
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 08:00:16PM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
> I was able to install sisu and sisu-markup-samples but I just can not
> install sisu-pdf :
But sisu-pdf itself *is* installable, as I've just tested; i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 391074 serious
Bug#391074: sdljump searches for theme in wrong directory
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 391239 pending
Bug#391239: libglib1.2-dev: makes some packages uninstallable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
Package: libksba8
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
A vulnerability has been found in libksba on SUSE that might also
affect Debian:
The libksba library 0.9.12 and possibly other versions, as used by
gpgsm in the newpg package on SUSE LINUX, allow
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 389069 important
Bug#389069: [driAllocateTexture:636] unable to allocate texture
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> tags 389069 -moreinfo
Bug#389069: [driAllocateTexture:636] unable to allocate texture
Tags were: unreproducible moreinf
tags 391239 pending
thanks
Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> The reason is that libglib1.2-dev does not provide libglib-dev any
> longer. Is there a good reason for this? If yes this bug should be
> cloned and reassigned to the now uninstallable packages.
libglib-dev is deprecated, therefore I removed.
Your message dated Thu, 5 Oct 2006 04:35:42 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391076: upx (even upx-ucl) is non-free
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 8.28.8-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I have the fglrx kernel module loaded and it loads without issue. However,
when trying to run X I get the following error in Xorg.0.log:
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open
Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I tried to upgrade apache2.0 to apache2.2, but got an error when it
was processing
apache2.2-common. Here's the error:
apt-get -f install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... D
Package: otrs
Version: 1:1.3.3p01-2
Severity: serious
Hello Torsten,
There is an error when attempting to purge otrs:
Removing otrs ...
Purging configuration files for otrs ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/otrs.postrm: line 6: deluser: command not found
dpkg: error processing otrs (--purge):
sub
Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
While trying to install this package apache2-common needs to be removed
but this comes up:
Removing apache2-common ...
Stopping apache 2.0 web server...grep: /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/*.conf:
No su
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 11:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391205: fixed in dvipdfmx 1:20050831-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 391205
Bug#391205: dvipdfmx: purging the package fails (mktexlsr and update-texmf
unavailable)
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 11:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391205: fixed in dvipdfmx 1:20050831-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
tags 391140 +pending
tags 391141 +pending
thanks
--
Address:Panthera Systems, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://www.panthera-systems.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Package: nntp
Version: 1.5.12.1-19
Severity: serious
Hello Blars,
There is an error when attempting to purge nntp:
Removing nntp ...
Purging configuration files for nntp ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/nntp.postrm: line 9: update-inetd: command not found
dpkg: error processing nntp (--purge):
s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 391140 +pending
Bug#391140: Uninstallable due to unavailable typo3-src-4.0
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 391141 +pending
Bug#391141: Recommends unavailable libpango1.0
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stop
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 19:48:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Already fixed in version 0.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Frank Küster wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ralf, hi Norbert,
>
> Still no answer...
Sorry, this message got pushed pack to deeply due to some email troubles
I had during the last few days. Never reboot the wrong server without
thinking :-(
>>> Should we just go o
Package: caudium-dev
Severity: serious
Version: 2:1.4.7-15
Hi
Your package is not installable as it depends on pike7.6-dev (<= 7.6.87-99)
while pike7.6 version 7.6.93-1 is in unstable.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 31
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 391231 391205
Bug#391231: ntp: file conflict with ntp-simple
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 391205, send any further explanations to Bill
Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> me
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> forcemerge 391243 390277
Bug#391243: Uninstallable due to unavailable gaim (<1:2.0)
Bug#390277: gaim-extendedprefs: uninstallable with gaim2.0
Forcibly Merged 390277 391243.
>
End of
Manolo Díaz wrote:
[..]
>
> I think now is time to have a beer.
I'd say you earned it ;-)
Thank you very much for your help. I really appreciate that.
I'm already in contact with upstream and hope we can find a workable
solution soon.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the instruments
Package: gnome-user-share
Severity: serious
Version: 0.10-1
Hi
Your package is not installable as it depends on apache2 (<2.1) which is not
available in unstable anymore. You might want to look into supporting apache2
>= 2.2.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2006 19:48:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Already fixed in version 0.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Package: libautounit-dev
Severity: serious
Version: 0.20.1-1
Hi
Your package is not installable as it depends on libglib-dev which is not
available in unstable anymore. You might want to update the depends to
libglib1.2-dev or libglib2.0-dev if appropriate.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://pe
Every time I try to run gtkpod, I get errors like this:compy[1001]:~% gtkpod*** glibc detected *** malloc(): memory corruption (fast): 0x084fcb10***zsh: abort gtkpodDowngrading DOESN'T help. Not sure if this is gtkpod or something else.
Happy to provide more info if needed. Thanks!-- System In
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 388399 tex-common
Bug#388399: "mktexmf: line 92: mf31966.tmp: Permission denied" on alpha, mips
and mipsel
Bug reassigned from package `tetex-bin' to `tex-common'.
> severity 388399 normal
Bug#388399: "mktexmf: line 92: mf31966.tmp: Permissio
Package: gaim-meanwhile
Severity: serious
Version: 1.2.8-2
Hi
Your package is not installable as it depends on gaim (<1:2.0) while gaim
1:2.0.0+beta3.1-4 is in unstable. As the API of gaim has changed your package
probably needs some changes to support this new version. The changes in the
API of
Package: gaim-extendedprefs
Severity: serious
Version: 0.5-3
Hi
Your package is not installable as it depends on gaim (<1:2.0) while gaim
1:2.0.0+beta3.1-4 is in unstable. As the API of gaim has changed your package
probably needs some changes to support this new version. The changes in the
API o
reassign 388399 tex-common
severity 388399 normal
retitle 388399 document that packages need to clean up their font cache
stop
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That's actually a good idea, yes. Package maintainers have to set
>> TEXMFVAR so something inside the current directory. I
Package: libquicktime-dev
Severity: serious
Version: 1:0.9.7-0.6+b1
Hi
Your package depends on libglib-dev which is not available in unstable anymore.
You might want to depend on libglib1.2-dev or port the application to glib
2.0...
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk -
Package: evolution
Version: 2.8.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Since upgrading to version 2.8.1-1 (from the previous release in
experimental) I have seen the following message every time I try to
access my IMAP account's J
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
