Eric,
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:46:17PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:27:10AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> > Swami for example uses fluidsynth as its synthesizer engine and works
> > perfectly without external sound banks.
> That's new information to me
Package: fvwm-crystal
Version: 3.0.3-3.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
fvwm-crystal's copyright file indicates that the package is under the
GPL, but a non-GPL Firefox icon is included in
usr/share/fvwm-crystal/fvwm-crystal/fvwm/icons/Default/22x22/apps/firefox.png
(and others). Ot
Package: gdesklets-data
Version: 0.35.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
gdesklets-data's copyright file indicates that the package is under the
GPL, but a non-GPL Firefox icon is included in
usr/share/gdesklets/Displays/gnomebar/gfx/firefox.png.
Additionally, gdesklets-data is in m
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 10:14:29PM +0200, Eckhart W??rner wrote:
> The reason for the compile problem seems to be that xorg 7.1 is in unstable
> now, but linuxwacom does not support xorg 7.1 (yet). Therefore build is
> broken in unstable, still working in testing. This will break compile on
> te
Package: gnome-session
Version: 2.14.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I recently upgraded to Xorg 7.1. Since doing so, logging into GNOME produces
my background, and dark-grey where the gnome-panel should be.
The system is still responsive, except no further updates ar
Tags 385925 + pending
Thanks
I have tested the patches provided by Michael Ablassmeier and Christian
Aichinger, and I have confirmed that applying both these patches together
fixes the problem.
I'm attaching the full interdiff output of the upload I'm about to do. As
you can see, it's just the c
Sorry for taking so long to reply.
We are sorry to inform you that our product is still not in stores.
Currently we are only offering it on our product website and plan on having it
in stores come November 2006.
As mentioned Dr. English is still recommending a 4 month supply for best
results.
I
Sorry for taking so long to reply.
We are sorry to inform you that our product is still not in stores.
Currently we are only offering it on our product website and plan on having it
in stores come November 2006.
As mentioned Dr. Lang is still recommending a 4 month supply for best results.
If yo
Hi Eeltje,
There is a new version of libavcodec0d available in unstable. Since the
evidence points to this being a libavcodec problem, could you try installing
this new version to see whether it fixes the bug? If so, I'll go ahead and
close this report.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 19:47:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385382: fixed in tomboy 0.4.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
tags 389016 + unreproducible moreinfo
severity 389016 important
thanks
I can't reproduce this on my system, thus I am downgrading this to
severity important.
I tested:
ii mono-mcs 1.1.17.1-3 Mono C# compiler
ii muine 0.8.5-1+b1 Simple playl
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 20:28:18 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> the package uses the prebuilt jar files in lib for the build and FTBFS
> without them. please either use existing debian packages as build
> dependencies or package needed build dependencies.
Thanks for pointing out this problem, I'll l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 389016 + unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#389016: mono fails to work: assertion failed: (async_call_klass)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo
> severity 389016 important
Bug#389016: mono fails to work: assertion failed: (async
Op zo, 24-09-2006 te 00:39 +0200, schreef Steinar H. Gunderson:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 08:20:30PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> > The failure is in the NOT in the build-arch target but in the
> > build-indep-stamp target as the log shows:
>
> That doesn't really matter.
I agree with that
> >
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> close 383855 1.0.7184-1
Bug#383855: nvidia-glx-legacy-dev: Missing GL/glext.h file
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in vers
Looking at the end of the backtrace:
Core was generated by `pan'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 0xb79281f9 in cairo_xlib_surface_get_display () from /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2
#1 0xb790d7b1 in cairo_surface_reference () from /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2
#2 0xb7901fdc in cairo_
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package perl
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report for
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 02:54:55PM -0700, Garrett Patrick McLean wrote:
> Package: gstreamer0.10-plugins-good
> Version: 0.10.3-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> Can't install this package, same deal with libavc1394-0 (not sure if I
> should file a bug there as well,
Sorry for any trouble I might have caused, I just did a fresh sid install from the etch beta 3 businesscard image and was confused about why I couldn't install gnome-media. Glad and not at all surprised to see that it's all under control and for a good reason. Thanks for the continued excellent wor
Package: guessnet
Version: 0.40-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
guessnet --help does not work. The problem is in libwibble, and has
been fixed in darcs. An upload of the fixed wibble in sid is pending,
following which an upload of guessnet build-depending on the new wibble
will solve the issue.
Reg
Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0.2-1-i386
Version: 3.0.2-3+hg9762-1
Followup-For: Bug #387238
This happens on a PIII as well. Looks similar to an earlier bug report
I filed (bug #385934).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'),
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 08:20:30PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> The failure is in the NOT in the build-arch target but in the
> build-indep-stamp target as the log shows:
That doesn't really matter.
> build *IS* called by the dpkg-buildpackage and as such by the build
> daemons which *IS* in th
Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 15:47:34 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388557: fixed in mono 1.1.17.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 12:39:44AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> IOW, you can't take build-indep out of build.
Oh, I missed the part of policy actually saying this out in clear (4.9):
The `build' target should depend on those of the targets `build-arch' and
`build-indep' that are pro
Package: galeon
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: serious
The copyright file for galeon claims:
"This package may be redistributed under the terms of the GNU GPL,
version 2 or later"
This statement is incorrect. Galeon as a whole is distributed under the
GPL version 2 - some parts of the code do not ha
Package: gstreamer0.10-plugins-good
Version: 0.10.3-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Can't install this package, same deal with libavc1394-0 (not sure if I
should file a bug there as well, please feel free to advise).
Thanks!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: test
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Package: rest2web-doc
Version: 0.5.0~beta~svn-r210-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
rest2web-doc's copyright file indicates that the package's content is by
default under the BSD, but a non-BSD Firefox icon is included in
/usr/share/doc/rest2web/html/images
The reason for the compile problem seems to be that xorg 7.1 is in unstable
now, but linuxwacom does not support xorg 7.1 (yet). Therefore build is
broken in unstable, still working in testing. This will break compile on
testing as soon as xorg 7.1 gets in there.
--
Eckhart Wörner
GPG Fingerpr
Package: gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg
Version: 4.1.1-nf1
Severity: serious
The license texts are part of the man pages, just splitted out into
their own man pages gpl(7) and gfdl(7). Either include the texts into
the man pages or package these two manual pages as well (i.e. see the
gcc-defaults package f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 386182 pending
Bug#386182: CVE-2006-4305: remote arbitrary code execution
Tags were: security
Tags added: pending
> tags 388106 moreinfo
Bug#388106: maxdb-webtools: postinst failure (error while loading shared
libraries: libc.so.6)
There were no
On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 14:39 +0200, Thomas Huriaux wrote:
> You will also find attached patches for the mono-xsp2 and the
> mono-apache-server packages, which contains the same problem.
don't worry, I fixed the all the templates.
thanks for noting this though, I almost missed :)
--
Regards,
Mir
Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:47:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387585: fixed in conglomerate 0.9.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:47:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388866: fixed in conglomerate 0.9.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:47:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388866: fixed in conglomerate 0.9.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:47:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387585: fixed in conglomerate 0.9.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:47:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#338470: fixed in typo3-site-installer 0.94+debian-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Package: 3ddesktop
Version: 0.2.9-5.1
Severity: grave
When there are more than one window acquired, it slowdown showing
repeteadly the error:
[driAllocateTexture:636] unable to allocate texture
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, '
Package: jabref
Version: 2.1-3
Severity: serious
the package uses the prebuilt jar files in lib for the build and FTBFS
without them. please either use existing debian packages as build
dependencies or package needed build dependencies.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
Op za, 23-09-2006 te 15:33 +0200, schreef Steinar H. Gunderson:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 12:10:35AM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> > I have prepared a simple patch for the FTFBS which is attached. As I am
> > no DD yet, I can not do the actual NMU. Marga would you like to do the
> > actual upload?
On Sep 23, 2006, at 3:15 AM, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 00:41:05 -0700 (-0700), Daniel Gimpelevich
wrote:
I'd like to apologize in advance for the tone of this message, but
the situation with this package is really irritating. Ten months
ago, I added a "me-too" type message
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 324560 normal
Bug#324560: Not 64-bit clean?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 09:22:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386763: fixed in openoffice.org 2.0.4~rc2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 09:17:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388639: fixed in xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:1.1.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
severity 324560 normal
thanks
No need for a serious severity; this bug should not be breaking
anything. See upstream bug for more details.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well,
The change is quite simple, and was done in Ubuntu[1]:
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), kdelibs4-dev (>= 4:3.1.2-2),
kdelibs-bin (>= 4:3.1.2-2), docbook-to-man, autotools-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), kdelibs4-dev (>= 4:3.1.2-2),
docbook-to-man, autotools-dev
[1] http://p
Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> option C, we create a way to extract the version information from every
>> grub file. So that the grub shell can check that its version matches
>> the stage files and if not generate an ERROR message.
>
> Note that stage1 is a boot sector and so
Package: apache2-common
Version: 2.2.3-1~exp.r170
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental
Hello,
since the installation of the experimental version apache2-mpm-prefork
doesn't start anymore, the init.d script shows:
=
Starting web server (apache2)...apache2: Syntax error on line 185 of \
/etc/apa
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 12:32:07PM +0100, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Can anyone comment on whether or not it is problematic for us to
> > distribute a tiny icon of Firefox's logo? [...]
>
> IIRC we have no current copyright permission for it, even in th
Tag: pending
Patch pending.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:24:34AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> warning: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error.
>
> warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libasound.so.2" is not at the
> expected address
>
> warning: difference appears
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
only a short question: Is there some good reason why we should not
integrate the proposed patch (by Albert Cahalan on debburn-devel [1] or
[2]) which would fix the license problems?
Because if not I would appreciate a check-in to the svn reposito
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 12:10:35AM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> I have prepared a simple patch for the FTFBS which is attached. As I am
> no DD yet, I can not do the actual NMU. Marga would you like to do the
> actual upload?
This patch looks wrong, sorry:
> -build: build-arch build-indep
> +bui
tags 379413 pending
thanks
uploaded 2.0.7-3, but needs to go through NEW.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 15:43:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389030: xserver-xorg: does not start (after reboot) if no
mouse is attached
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 379413 pending
Bug#379413: fails to install
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 06:32:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389005: fixed in xsp 1.1.17.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
o the same upstream version, not the
specific debian source revision).
| Automatic build of libglade-java_2.12.4-1+b1 on auric by sbuild/sparc 85
| Build started at 20060923-0906
| **
[...]
| ** Using build dependencies s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 388711 php-fpdf
Bug#388711: ldap-account-manager failure when open in web browser and login
Bug reassigned from package `php-fpdf' to `php-fpdf'.
> end
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> Hi,
Unknown command or malformed argu
Le sam 23 septembre 2006 14:25, The Wanderer a écrit :
> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Le sam 23 septembre 2006 02:50, The Wanderer a écrit :
> >> Package: apt-listchanges
> >> Version: 2.63
> >> Severity: grave
> >> Justification: renders package unusable
> >>
> >>
> >> For some time now, every time
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.22
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
I have found that if I plug out the USB mouse and restart the system the
X server will not start unless th mouse is attached. Removing the mouse
after the server has started has no ill effects.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> retitle 389016 mono fails to work: assertion failed: (async_call_klass)
Bug#389016: tomboy: Tomboy fails to run
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Package: libapache-mod-mono
Version: 1.1.17-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Tags: patch
Hi,
There is a missing space at the begining of your long description, that
makes your package not configurable. The attached patch fixes the problem.
I have also rephrased the long d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 389005 grave
Bug#389005: mono-xsp: Fails to configure due to templates parse error
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Hi,
okay, here we go (in order to avoid people at BSPs wasting time).
Preliminary (i386) packages are at
deb http://www.num.uni-sb.de/~weber/debian unstable/
These are very preliminary (the changelog entries are not really
accurate, but Octaviz is not a package where I want to interr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 389016 mono
Bug#389016: tomboy: Tomboy fails to run
Bug reassigned from package `tomboy' to `mono'.
> found 389016 1.1.13.8-1
Bug#389016: tomboy: Tomboy fails to run
Bug marked as found in version 1.1.13.8-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here
Tomboy and Muine both fail with the same error, so I guess this is mono's fault
rather than Tomboy's.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le sam 23 septembre 2006 02:50, The Wanderer a écrit :
Package: apt-listchanges
Version: 2.63
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
For some time now, every time I install a package via apt-get,
apt-listchanges does not pop up its display of changelog
Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Can anyone comment on whether or not it is problematic for us to
> distribute a tiny icon of Firefox's logo? [...]
IIRC we have no current copyright permission for it, even in the browser
sources. So, yes, a problem. Can you ask Mozilla.org whether the logo
is a
(gdb) info threads
3 Thread 16386 (LWP 23127) 0xa7b352fc in clone ()
from /usr/lib/debug/libc.so.6
2 Thread 32769 (LWP 23126) 0xa7aa3b01 in kill ()
at ../string/bits/string2.h:998
* 1 Thread 16384 (LWP 23120) 0xa7aa3b01 in kill ()
at ../string/bits/string2.h:998
(gdb) thread appl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 310776 pending
Bug#310776: typo3-src-3.7: suggests invalud package
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 311277 pending
Bug#311277: typo3-src-3.7: package doesn't depend on php-
Package: tomboy
Version: 0.3.9+dfsg-2.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Since logging in this morning the tomboy applet has failed to appear on
my GNOME panel. Strangely I have not seen the 'panel applet died, do you
want to re
Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 04:17:45 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383467: fixed in wipe 0.21-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 11:28:45AM +0100, Pablo Chinea wrote:
> El Sábado, 23 de Septiembre de 2006 10:19, Steve Langasek escribió:
> > It most certainly is a policy violation. A package is not allowed to edit
> > a conffile, *ever*.
> I didn't know it :-S, sorry. Though looking at sysv-rc pack
Antono Vasiljev wrote:
> xmms2d
> Bad glib version: GLib version too old (micro mismatch)
This is fixed upstream:
http://git.xmms.se/?p=xmms2-devel.git;a=commit;h=f0a9265ae3612988931b1ed4a0d8502d6a22c5d1
anders
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
reopen 388779
thanks
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 02:02:07AM -0700, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
>* The "Your very personal RC bug" release
>* ucf handling in prerm instead of postrm (closes: #388779 - RC)
- There is no such thing as a prerm "purge".
- prerm happens /before/ the package is removed
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 00:41:05 -0700 (-0700), Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
> I'd like to apologize in advance for the tone of this message, but
> the situation with this package is really irritating. Ten months
> ago, I added a "me-too" type message to bug #268471 begging for the
> current upstre
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:55 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> reassign 388399 tetex-bin
> > Bug#388399: "mktexmf: line 92: mf31966.tmp: Permission denied" on alpha,
> > mips and mipsel
> > Bug reassigned from package `gnuplot' to `tetex-bin'.
>
> Hm. It's not a general mipsel/alpha/mips problem.
El Sábado, 23 de Septiembre de 2006 10:19, Steve Langasek escribió:
> It most certainly is a policy violation. A package is not allowed to edit
> a conffile, *ever*.
I didn't know it :-S, sorry. Though looking at sysv-rc package I
see /etc/init.d/rc is not classified as conffile. Anyway, I bel
Hi,
I think this is a bug in the FPDF package. I noticed that you added a
second parameter "false" to the class_exists() call. The PHP API
documentation does not include such a second parameter.
I suggest to remove the class_exists() call completely. Libraries are
included with include_once() and
Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 02:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386935: fixed in gstm 1.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 09:20:00AM +0100, Pablo Chinea wrote:
> El Viernes, 22 de Septiembre de 2006 21:12, Julien Cristau escribió:
> > ...postinst uses patch to modify /etc/init.d/rc...
> This file MUST be patched in order to show the progress bar, this isn't a
> policy violation.
It most ce
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 388711 php-fpdf
Bug#388711: ldap-account-manager failure when open in web browser and login
Bug reassigned from package `ldap-account-manager' to `php-fpdf'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Daniel Baumann skrev:
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
This was about a month ago -- any progress?
[...]
Well, the "problem" is, that the kernel-team will prepare a modules
package to conglomerate all oot-modules.
>[...]
Google came up with the following thread:
http://lists.debian.org/de
Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 18:52:01 +0930
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: severity of 388776 is serious
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 10:30:03AM +0200, Heikki Henriksen wrote:
> On 9/22/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 06:34:00AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> >> > tag 341172 + fixed-in-experimental
> >> Bug#341172: Please port to the experimental pilot-
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:35:20PM +0200, Eckhart W??rner wrote:
> In file included from /usr/include/xorg/xisb.h:32,
> from ../../src/xf86Wacom.h:67,
> from ../../src/xf86Wacom.c:103:
> /usr/include/unistd.h:189: error: conflicting types for
> ‘xf86ssize_t’
Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 02:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388779: fixed in postgrey 1.27-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 341172 sid
Bug#341172: Please port to the experimental pilot-link 0.12 API
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental patch
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
El Viernes, 22 de Septiembre de 2006 21:12, Julien Cristau escribió:
> ...postinst uses patch to modify /etc/init.d/rc...
This file MUST be patched in order to show the progress bar, this isn't a
policy violation.
> ...that the maintainer scripts fail if you run them twice...
Try with 'apt-
Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:30:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Fixed in upload of evolution 2.8.0-1 to experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
severity #388215 normal
thanks,
The package now contains the workaround from
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69642 in 'preinst.
This is ugly, however, so I'm leaving this open with reduced severity until
OOo 2.0.4 enters Testing and makes the workaround unnecessary.
Thanks Tee
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity #388215 normal
Bug#388215: fails to install without root user profile/Setup.xcu
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks,
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> The package now contains the workaround from
Unknown comman
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> found 384262 2:1.1.1-6
Bug#384262: Fonts don't get displayed anymore
Bug marked as found in version 2:1.1.1-6.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 388606 pending
Bug#388606: samba: purging the package fails (update-inetd not available)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
I'd like to apologize in advance for the tone of this message, but the
situation with this package is really irritating. Ten months ago, I
added a "me-too" type message to bug #268471 begging for the current
upstream version to replace the one in Debian. Not only did nothing
ever come of that,
Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 09:16:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #388993,
regarding rest2web-doc: non-free Firefox icon included
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(NB: If you are a syste
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 325462
Bug#325462: libdrm: FTBFS: Missing build dependencies.
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> reopen 324560
Bug#324560: Not 64
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package rtorrent
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: rtorrent
> severity 388842 minor
Bug#388842: Missing changelog
Severity set to `minor' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
Hi,
The same bug occurs with the new versions,
xserver-xorg-core_2%3a1.1.1-6_i386.deb
xserver-xorg-core_2%3a1.1.1-7_i386.deb
[names taken from /var/cache/apt]
Again, reverting to older version,
xserver-xorg-core_2%3a1.0.2-10_i386.deb,
seems to solve the problem.
I am using unstable / sid, wi
Package: rest2web-doc
Version: 0.5.0~beta~svn-r210-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
rest2web-doc's copyright file indicates that the package's content is by
default under the BSD, but a non-BSD Firefox icon is included in
/usr/share/doc/rest2web/html/images/firefox.gif.
Additionnall
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
