Processed: confirming 387585 388866

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 387585 confirmed Bug#387585: Uninstallable on amd64 Tags were: patch Bug#388866: conglomerate: not binNMU-safe, unsatisfiable depends on conglomerate-common_0.9.1-2+b1 Tags added: confirmed > tags 388866 confirmed Bug#388866: conglomerate: not bi

Bug#238071: marked as done (mueller: FTBFS: Permission problems)

Your message dated Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:35:10 +0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line FTBFS: Permission problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#388872: glade: not binNMU-safe, uninstallable in unstable

Package: glade Version: 2.12.1-5 Severity: serious The glade source package is not binNMU-safe, because glade-2 Depends: glade (= ${Source-Version}) but glade-2 is arch: all and glade is arch: any, so on binNMU glade_${Source-Version} is no longer available. This would not be a serious bug on its

Bug#388842: rtorrent: Missing changelog

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 package rtorrent severity 388842 minor thanks I don't think this is a policy violation, so I'm changing the severity from serious to minor. - -- ~ghostbar @ linux/debian 'unstable' on i686 - Linux Counter# 382503 http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - irc.freenod

Processed: severity of 387585 is serious, merging 387585 388866

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > severity 387585 serious Bug#387585: Uninstallable on amd64 Severity set to `serious' from `grave' > merge 387585 388866 Bug#387585: Uninstallable on amd64 Bug#388866: conglomerate: n

Processed: I believe this to be related to the python-apt bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 388470 important Bug#388470: update-manager dies with a segmentation fault. Severity set to `important' from `grave' > reassign 388470 python-apt 0.6.19 Bug#388470: update-manager dies with a segmentation fault. Bug reassigned from package `up

Bug#388842: Missing changelog

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Goswin von Brederlow escribió: > Package: rtorrent > Version: 0.6.2-1 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > the rtorrent package seems to be missing the upstream changelog completly. > > MfG > Goswin Yes, in the upstream version the changelog have

Bug#388866: conglomerate: not binNMU-safe, unsatisfiable depends on conglomerate-common_0.9.1-2+b1

Package: conglomerate Version: 0.9.1-2 Severity: serious The current version of conglomerate is uninstallable in unstable, because it's not binNMU-safe and the package has been binNMUed for the dbus transition. conglomerate has a dependency on: Depends: conglomerate-common (>= ${Upstream-Versio

Bug#388867: bbclone: non-free Firefox icon included

Package: bbclone Version: 0.4.6-5 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 bbclone's copyright file indicates that the package is under the GPL, but a non-GPL Firefox icon is included. Additionnally, bbclone is in main and the Firefox icon is not modifiable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM

Processed: Fixed in NMU of fglrx-driver 8.28.8-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 382038 + fixed Bug#382038: fglrx-driver: Driver needs to be updated for xorg 7.1.1 There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > tag 388812 + fixed Bug#388812: fglrx-driver provides xserver-xorg-video There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > tag

Bug#387610: [PATCH] apr_atomic_cas broken in 0.9.x

"William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Philip or Troy - would you care to prepare and test the backport to ensure > we can commit this for the next 0.9 release, coming within days? The 1.2.x branch has changed the name/signature to apr_atomic_cas32 and no longer passes longs; it's n

Bug#388865: klogic_1.62-7+b1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: bad build-depends

Package: klogic Version: 1.62-7+b1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of klogic_1.62-7+b1 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 85 > Build started at 20060922-1535 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depend

Processed: found 386319 in 1.2.0-3

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > found 386319 1.2.0-3 Bug#386319: gnome-commander: Ships with scrollkeeper files Bug marked as found in version 1.2.0-3. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#388861: apt-listchanges: consistently fails with traceback in DebianControlParser.py line 19

Le sam 23 septembre 2006 02:50, The Wanderer a écrit : > Package: apt-listchanges > Version: 2.63 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > > For some time now, every time I install a package via apt-get, > apt-listchanges does not pop up its display of changelogs. Instead, I

Processed: Re: Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 388691 normal Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs da

Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

severity 388691 normal thanks On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 07:19:16PM -0300, Wagner Bruna wrote: > ["public use"] > > Your reading of this clause is not the plain English reading of it. > > "public use" does not mean "use in public", in means "use by the > > public" -- i.e., "use by anyone". > I do

Bug#388861: apt-listchanges: consistently fails with traceback in DebianControlParser.py line 19

Package: apt-listchanges Version: 2.63 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable For some time now, every time I install a package via apt-get, apt-listchanges does not pop up its display of changelogs. Instead, I get the following (immediately after "Retrieving bug reports... Done

Bug#325441: remove from debian

Brian White wrote: > I tried to rename it but it was rejected as being a "new package" and I > just haven't had the time/will/desire to follow through. Do you have a copy of the reject message? I'd like to know what exactly the reasons were for rejecting a renamed package. Sounds like a misunders

Bug#388489: Processed: Cloning this bug

reopen 388489 severity wishlist thanks Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> reopen 388489 >> thanks >> >> Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Debian Bug Trac

Bug#388031: marked as done (radeontool FTBFS on powerpc/unstable)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:02:12 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#388031: fixed in radeontool 1.5-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#387610: apr_atomic_cas broken in 0.9.x

Philip or Troy - would you care to prepare and test the backport to ensure we can commit this for the next 0.9 release, coming within days? Bill Philip Martin wrote: > Troy Heber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> In any case, this looks like the culprit. > > Agreed, I've cc'd [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Processed: Cloning this bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 388489 Bug#388489: libc6-i386: Missing /etc.ld.so.conf.d/i486-linux-gnu.conf Bug reopened, originator not changed. > severity wishlist Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if y

Bug#352854: marked as done (FTBFS: Packages required but not available: mlmRev)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:07:21 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed in new version of lme4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Bug#387610: apr_atomic_cas broken in 0.9.x

Troy Heber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In any case, this looks like the culprit. Agreed, I've cc'd [EMAIL PROTECTED] The C implementation of apr_atomic_cas on the 0.9.x branch is broken on ia64, and probably any other 64 bit platform that uses the same code. For the full story see: http://bug

Processed: purge failures w/o debconf not RC

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 388646 important Bug#388646: cpad-kernel-source: purging the package fails (debconf unavailable) Severity set to `important' from `serious' > severity 388155 important Bug#388155: cyrus21-common: purging the package fails (require debconf) Sev

Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

--- Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ["public use"] > Your reading of this clause is not the plain English reading of it. > "public use" does not mean "use in public", in means "use by the > public" -- i.e., "use by anyone". I don't know if it is clear enough, at least for a non-native

Bug#387610: subversion: FTBFS on ia64

On 09/22/06 16:32, Philip Martin wrote: > The first time the breakpoint is reached it's from the > svn_test__create_fs line, the second time it's from the > svn_fs_open_berkeley line. The key has the same value in each case, > and the second time that value is present in the cache, so the hash > l

Bug#379724: possible NMU patch for RC bug

tags 379724 patch usertag 379724 supplied-patch thanks Hi, I have prepared a simple patch for the FTFBS which is attached. As I am no DD yet, I can not do the actual NMU. Marga would you like to do the actual upload? Greetings Arjan Changelog of my NMU: * Non-maintainer upload. * Set urgen

Bug#388214: marked as done (config/postrm depends on non-essential packages (dbconfig-common, probably ucf))

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:47:30 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#388214: fixed in cacti 0.8.6h-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Processed: possible NMU patch for RC bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 379724 patch Bug#379724: wrong build depends: eval: 1: xa: not found There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > usertag 379724 supplied-patch Bug#379724: wrong build depends: eval: 1: xa: not found There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: su

Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

[sent also to debian-legal for advice] --- Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:47:55PM -0300, Wagner Bruna wrote: > > --- Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > > > > > > Particularly, "public use" needs clarification: > > > > "Copyright 1989 by Georgi

Bug#388844: xmms2d crashes on start with "Bad glib version" message...

Package: xmms2 Version: 0.2DrFeelgood-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello! I've just installed xmms2 and other dependencies + some other plugins (smb, wma). Now i'am trying to launch xmms2 xmms2 ERROR: Cou

Bug#388223: marked as done (config/postrm depends on non-essential packages (dbconfig-common, probably ucf))

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:22:11 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line not a bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#388717: libclass-dbi-perl: FTBFS: test failures

On 21/09/06, Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Package: libclass-dbi-perl Version: 3.0.14-1 Severity: serious [ FTBFS] Thanks for the bug report, I was not previously aware of the problem. This appears to be caused by a bug introduced into libdbd-sqlite3-perl version 1.13. If you ha

Bug#341172: Processed: Fixed in upload of evolution 2.8.0-1 to experimental

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 06:34:00AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > tag 341172 + fixed-in-experimental > Bug#341172: Please port to the experimental pilot-link 0.12 API > Tags were: patch > Tags added: fixed-in-experimental Did you not understand that this version of pilot-link is now

Bug#388840: fglrx-driver: Conflict with Xorg-server 7.1.0 package

Package: fglrx-driver Version: 8.28.8-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When I updated Today my Debian unstable, it updated the Xorg-sevrver too. But It also remove fglrx-driver. So now I must use the xorg radeon driver instead of the ati One -- System Information: Debia

Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:47:55PM -0300, Wagner Bruna wrote: > --- Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > > > Particularly, "public use" needs clarification: > > > "Copyright 1989 by Georgia Tech Research > > > Corporation, Atlanta, GA 30332. > > > All Rights Reserved. GTRC hereby grants p

Bug#388842: Missing changelog

Package: rtorrent Version: 0.6.2-1 Severity: serious Hi, the rtorrent package seems to be missing the upstream changelog completly. MfG Goswin -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shel

Bug#387871: marked as done (boost - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/lib/libboost_python-gcc-1_33_1.so.1.33.1': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 22:40:14 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing... has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope

Processed: subversion Debian ci: r687 - trunk/debian

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 387996 pending Bug#387996: subversion: [m68k] fix for the failing ruby tests Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrato

Processed: Re: cbmlink: FTBFS: bashisms

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 379724 wrong build depends: eval: 1: xa: not found Bug#379724: cbmlink: FTBFS: bashisms Changed Bug title. > severity 379724 serious Bug#379724: wrong build depends: eval: 1: xa: not found Severity set to `serious' from `important' > thanks St

Bug#388838: sysv-rc-bootsplash: modifies files belonging to other packages

Package: sysv-rc-bootsplash Version: 1.0.2-1 Severity: serious sysv-rc-bootsplash's postinst uses patch to modify /etc/init.d/rc and /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/functions. This means that the changes are lost if sysv-rc or initramfs-tools is upgraded, that the maintainer scripts fail if yo

Processed: retitle 385296 to broken with ssl on amd64

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > retitle 385296 broken with ssl on amd64 Bug#385296: tries to shutdown invalid file descriptor on amd64 Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:47:55PM -0300, Wagner Bruna wrote: > --- Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > > > > Particularly, "public use" needs clarification: > > > "Copyright 1989 by Georgia Tech Research > > > Corporation, Atlanta, GA 30332. > > > All Rights Reserved. GTRC hereby grants

Bug#388431: improved patch

Hello! Here is an improved variant of patch. It allows system administrator to configure RLIMIT_RTPRIO RLIMIT_NICE via "rt_priority" and "nice" entries in /etc/security/limits.conf Best regards, Alexei. -- All science is either physics or stamp collecting. Index: pam-0.79/Linux-PAM/modules/pa

Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

--- Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > > Particularly, "public use" needs clarification: > > "Copyright 1989 by Georgia Tech Research > > Corporation, Atlanta, GA 30332. > > All Rights Reserved. GTRC hereby grants public > > use of this software." > > Neither I nor the ftp-team see a p

Processed: Debian Kerberosish: r2493 - krb5/trunk/krb5/debian

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 388784 pending Bug#388784: krb5-kdc: purging the package fails (debconf unavailable) There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrato

Processed: reassign 388811 to mesa, severity of 388811 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > reassign 388811 mesa Bug#388811: xlibmesa-dri: upgrade to xorg 7.1 causes savage opengl stop working Bug reassigned from package `xlibmesa-dri' to `mesa'. > severity 388811 important

Bug#388115: Re 388115: tetex-base postinst fails

I ran into this too. I ran update-fmtutil (as root) and re-reran the dist-upgrade. The problem remains. I'm not sure if this is the requested test, but it was my best interpretation of it. I can provide the details that others have, if that might be helpful. I think I can leave things in this

Processed: severity of 388776 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > severity 388776 serious Bug#388776: xserver-xorg-input-wacom: Source package fails to compile Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Ple

Bug#104394: Message for melissa groeber

How are you, Royal has receiieved your filled app. Mitch shall then Re-confirm yo ur data . http://AE0F4B.ssr.be For melissa groeber and your past Track Record is not an iss ue. All H 0me E quitytypes have been aprroveed for you melissa groeber Best Regards, Ines

Bug#388811: xlibmesa-dri: upgrade to xorg 7.1 causes savage opengl stop working

Package: xlibmesa-dri Version: 1:7.1.0-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software An upgrade from xorg 7.0 to xorg 7.1 causes 3d stop working with savage dri driver (with a mobile Prosavage KN133 "twister"). glxinfo report "direct rendering=yes" but glxgears and any other openg

Bug#388809: htmldoc-common fails to upgrade smoothly

Package: htmldoc-common Version: 1.8.27-1 Severity: serious Preparing to replace htmldoc-common 1.8.26-1 (using .../htmldoc-common_1.8.27-1_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement htmldoc-common ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/htmldoc-common_1.8.27-1_all.deb (--unpack): trying to

Bug#387790: fillets-ng-data: broken symlinks

pe, 2006-09-22 kello 16:34 +0200, Alexander Schmehl kirjoitti: > * Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060916 20:01]: > > Severity: minor > > Hmmm... shouldn't broken symlinks due to missing dependencies be release > critical? Most likely they will render the package unusable, won't > they? Poss

Bug#388220: marked as done (config/postrm depends on non-essential packages (dbconfig-common, probably ucf))

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:32:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#388220: fixed in bacula 1.38.11-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#388222: marked as done (config/postrm depends on non-essential packages (dbconfig-common, probably ucf))

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:32:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#388222: fixed in bacula 1.38.11-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#387663: marked as done (pygopherd: sid package broken (incompatible with python 2.4))

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:02:43 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#387663: fixed in pygopherd 2.0.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#388571: [Pkg-awstats-devel] Bug#388571: awstats: Non-free Firefox icon included

Charles Fry schrieb: Can anyone comment on whether or not it is problematic for us to distribute a tiny icon of Firefox's logo? The only thing I could find is: http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/buttons.html which says "Mozilla Firefox and the Firefox logo are trademarks of The Mozilla

Bug#387185: picprog: Fails to detect programmer in amd64

Jaakko, I have recently received this bug-report about picprog (Debian). Let me summerize what we have found so far. - When asking around various people have confirmed that picprog fails on the 64-bit amd64 platform. - Altering the dela

Bug#387249: marked as done ([NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:32:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#387249: fixed in camstream 0.26.3+dfsg-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Processed: tags 387185 upstream

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 387185 upstream Bug#387185: picprog: Fails to detect programmer in amd64 There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > thanks bts Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me i

Bug#387610: subversion: FTBFS on ia64

Troy Heber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's not an optimization bug, compiling O0 does not help. We know that > lt-fs-base-test 2, creates and closes a new db, it then creates a new > fs object and tries to re-open the db. The call to apr_hash_get > returns NULL, so it's not finding the object i

Processed: Re: Processed: Cloning this bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 388489 Bug#388489: libc6-i386: Missing /etc.ld.so.conf.d/i486-linux-gnu.conf Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administr

Bug#388489: Processed: Cloning this bug

reopen 388489 thanks Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit : > retitle -1 libc6-i386: Missing /etc.ld.so.conf.d/i486-linux-gnu.conf >>> There is no need for such a file.

Bug#388489: marked as done (libc6-i386: Missing /etc.ld.so.conf.d/i486-linux-gnu.conf)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:56:06 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Processed: Cloning this bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Bug#388646: cpad-kernel-source: purging the package fails (debconf unavailable)

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 06:29:33PM +0930, Ron wrote: > > Hi Bill, > > That's fixed in cvs right now, but cvs needs a little more work to get > it happy with Life in Today's World. The kernel has moved about a bit > since I last hacked on this. Are you actually using it, or just qa > checking?

Processed: Re: Bug#387790: fillets-ng-data: broken symlinks

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 387790 serious Bug#387790: fillets-ng-data: broken symlinks Severity set to `serious' from `minor' > tags 387790 +pending Bug#387790: fillets-ng-data: broken symlinks There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks lars Unknown command o

Bug#388780: netenv: purging the package fails (debconf unavailable)

Package: netenv Version: 0.94.3-17 Severity: serious Hello Frank, There is an error when attempting to purge netenv: Removing netenv ... Purging configuration files for netenv ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/netenv.postrm: line 20: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No such file or directory dpkg: e

Processed: Re: Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 388691 moreinfo Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#388783: shfs-utils: purging the package fails (debconf unavailable)

Package: shfs-utils Version: 0.35-6 Severity: serious Hello Eduard, There is an error when attempting to purge shfs-utils: Removing shfs-utils ... Purging configuration files for shfs-utils ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/shfs-utils.postrm: line 2: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No such file or dir

Processed: Re: Bug#375830: Acknowledgement (occasionally misdetects PCI-Express card for PCI and dies before DRI)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 375830 8.28.8-1 Bug#375830: occasionally misdetects PCI-Express card for PCI and dies before DRI Bug marked as found in version 8.28.8-1. > severity 375830 serious Bug#375830: occasionally misdetects PCI-Express card for PCI and dies before DRI S

Bug#388571: [Pkg-awstats-devel] Bug#388571: awstats: Non-free Firefox icon included

Can anyone comment on whether or not it is problematic for us to distribute a tiny icon of Firefox's logo? The only thing I could find is: http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/buttons.html which says "Mozilla Firefox and the Firefox logo are trademarks of The Mozilla Foundation. Usage guide

Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

tags 388691 moreinfo thanks On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:36:24PM -0300, Wagner Bruna wrote: > The copyright file for ibm-3270 says: > "Copyrights on x3270 are a work in progress and any assistance > in clarifying them would be appreciated." > but there's no active bug about some issues. So it is ou

Bug#388782: fonty: purging the package fails (debconf unavailable)

Package: fonty Version: 1.0-22 Severity: serious Hello Piotr, There is an error when attempting to purge fonty: Removing fonty ... Purging configuration files for fonty ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/fonty.postrm: line 10: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No such file or directory dpkg: error pro

Bug#388779: postgrey: purging the package fails (ucf unavailable)

Package: postgrey Version: 1.27-1 Severity: serious Hello Adrian, There is an error when attempting to purge postgrey: Removing postgrey ... Purging configuration files for postgrey ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/postgrey.postrm: line 26: ucf: command not found dpkg: error processing postgrey (-

Bug#387610: subversion: FTBFS on ia64

On 09/22/06 00:04, Philip Martin wrote: > The error message is the one that would occur if Subversion's DB_ENV > cache failed in some way, and since most of the tests are being run > with FSFS the failing test might be the only one that exercises the > cache. Perhaps gcc is miscompiling Subversion

Bug#388781: phpsysinfo: purging the package fails (debconf unavailable)

Package: phpsysinfo Version: 2.5.1-3 Severity: serious Hello Frederik, There is an error when attempting to purge phpsysinfo: Removing phpsysinfo ... Purging configuration files for phpsysinfo ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/phpsysinfo.postrm: line 12: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No such file or

Bug#388784: krb5-kdc: purging the package fails (debconf unavailable)

Package: krb5-kdc Version: 1.4.4-1 Severity: serious Hello Sam, There is an error when attempting to purge krb5-kdc: Removing krb5-kdc ... Purging configuration files for krb5-kdc ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/krb5-kdc.postrm: line 3: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No such file or directory dpk

Processed: Fixed in upload of evolution 2.8.0-1 to experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 341172 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#341172: Please port to the experimental pilot-link 0.12 API Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > tag 384280 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#384280: evolution: implicit pointer conversion Tags were: pat

Bug#388322: marked as done (python-logilab-common: sarge to etch upgrade fails)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 05:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#388322: fixed in logilab-common 0.19.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#388743: marked as done (rdoc1.8: NameError within ri_options.rb)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 05:02:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#388743: fixed in ruby1.8 1.8.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#367267: ftp.debian.org: still not there

Package: ftp.debian.org Followup-For: Bug #367267 Hello, The packages are still not in the right places, couldn't something like a move by hand be done? In order to have my local mirror synced I have to ignore errors (debmirror) which I don't really like. I wonder if this would affect the availa

Bug#388756: zaptel-source: wct4xxp and other modules are not built anymore on zaptel-1.2.8.dfsg-1

On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 14:48 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > [...] > > I just rebuilt modules for the latest kernel (2.6.17-2) and some modules > > are missing, > > wct4xxp.ko is one of those. > > iIt is installed into a subdirectory and only the 2.6 build was adapted > for that. Hello Tzafrir, an

Bug#388649: marked as done ("Probably parenthesis mismatch in" errors in geda)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:48:06 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#388649: "Probably parenthesis mismatch in" errors in geda has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#388756: zaptel-source: wct4xxp and other modules are not built anymore on zaptel-1.2.8.dfsg-1

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 01:29:28PM +0200, Alessandro Polverini wrote: > Package: zaptel-source > Version: 1:1.2.8.dfsg-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > I just rebuilt modules for the latest kernel (2.6.17-2) and some modules are > missing, > wct4xxp.ko is one of t

Bug#387185: picprog: Fails to detect programmer in amd64

On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 01:25:01AM +0200, Jan Wagemakers wrote: > Normally picprog use the RDTSC instruction on x86_64/i386 platforms. By > disabling this, picprog makes use of the delay-routines for platforms that > don't have this RDTSC instruction. This should be done regardless of platform; RD

Bug#325441: remove from debian

Brian said that he was going to rename it, but that was a year ago. Unless there's some plan to fix it RSN, I think we should remove it from the archive in the meantime. I tried to rename it but it was rejected as being a "new package" and I just haven't had the time/will/desire to follow throu

Processed: Re: flexbackup: CVE-2005-4802: default config insecure temporary file creation

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 334350 1.2.1-2 Bug#334350: flexbackup: CVE-2005-4802: default config insecure temporary file creation Bug marked as found in version 1.2.1-2. > close 334350 1.2.1-3 Bug#334350: flexbackup: CVE-2005-4802: default config insecure temporary file c

Bug#388756: zaptel-source: wct4xxp and other modules are not built anymore on zaptel-1.2.8.dfsg-1

Package: zaptel-source Version: 1:1.2.8.dfsg-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I just rebuilt modules for the latest kernel (2.6.17-2) and some modules are missing, wct4xxp.ko is one of those. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing

Bug#334350: flexbackup: CVE-2005-4802: default config insecure temporary file creation

found 334350 1.2.1-2 close 334350 1.2.1-3 thanks On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 01:26:21PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > reopen 334350 Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > tags 334350 sarge > thanks I'm sorry, but this won't work anymore; if you reopen a bug, you remove all its versio

Bug#386855: marked as done (kphotoalbum should depend on libexiv2 (0.10))

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 03:32:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#386855: fixed in kphotoalbum 2.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#342976: marked as done (Package explicitely build-depends on g++-3.4)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 03:47:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#385834: fixed in kcheckgmail 0.5.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#385834: marked as done (package build-depends on g++-3.4, which is not available on hppa)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 03:47:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#385834: fixed in kcheckgmail 0.5.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Processed: Fixed in upload of gpsim-lcd 0.2.5-1 to experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 346736 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#346736: gpsim-lcd: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Tags were: fixed patch Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > tag 387779 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#387779: ITA: gpsim-lcd -- LCD module for gpsim There w

Bug#386882: marked as done (kphotoalbum: Depends on libexiv2 v. 0.10)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Sep 2006 03:32:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#386855: fixed in kphotoalbum 2.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#388743: rdoc1.8: NameError within ri_options.rb

Package: rdoc1.8 Version: 1.8.5-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable If requirering 'rdoc/usage', a NameError (uninitialized constant RI::Paths) is thrown due to missing require 'rdoc/ri/ri_paths' statement in ri_options. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstab

Processed: Re: Bug#388734: xfonts: after a dist-upgrade, the font system is broken, fonts display erraticly

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 388734 xfonts-base Bug#388734: xfonts: after a dist-upgrade, the font system is broken, fonts display erraticly Warning: Unknown package 'xfonts' Bug reassigned from package `xfonts' to `xfonts-base'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please co

Bug#388734: xfonts: after a dist-upgrade, the font system is broken, fonts display erraticly

Package: xfonts Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After a dist-upgrade, font rendering is borked in xorg. Sorry if it's not the good package, i have no idea what package this is related to. It breaks display of gnome application, kde application, firefox, thunderbird. IT s

Bug#388557: confirmed

tags 388557 + confirmed thanks This is a bug caused by dh_clideps from the cli-common package, only Mono is currently effected because the new version of cli-common wasn't released yet. A fix is in the way... After a short discussion on #debian-devel Steve agreed that a dependency on libc6 | lib

Processed: confirmed

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 388557 + confirmed Bug#388557: mono-gac: uninstallable on ia64, dependency on libc6 is incorrect There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syste

  1   2   >