Package: tetex-doc
Version: 3.0-11
Severity: serious
The license is clearly non-free:
| All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
| stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any
| means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise,
|
tags 345567 unreproducible
retitle 345567 xmms: uninstallable due to backup link
thanks
On 20:23 Sun 01 Jan 2006, Jose Parrella wrote:
> Finished ok. The error message that you're getting from dpkg is the
> translation of:
[snip]
> Hope this is useful for you,
Thanks José,
Tagging this as un
Package: freeloader
Version: 0.3-3
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Running "freeloader" results in the following error message:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/freeloader", line 42, in ?
import gnomevfs
ImportError: No module named gnome
register_globals is often turned on to support legacy code and
CVE-2005-3390 makes code which by the documentation should be safe not so.
Consider:
> ; You should do your best to write your scripts so that they do not require
> ; register_globals to be on; Using form variables as globals can eas
severity 343525 important
thanks
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Jorgen Schaefer wrote:
> The maintainer's opinion: I'm both the Debian maintainer and
> upstream for emms. The package includes the debian/ directory in the
> official distribution. Hence, I didn't think it would be necessary
> to give it a Deb
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 03:00:04PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: e2fsprogs
> Version: 1.38+1.39-WIP-2005.12.10-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package is failing to build on most arches with the
> following error:
> CC /build/buildd/e2fsprogs-1.38+1.39-WIP-2005.12.10/e2fsck/
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 12:39:31PM -0500, Eric Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 03:32:40AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > - a handful of packages that still build-depend on ocaml-3.08.3 or similar,
> > and require sourceful uploads for the ocaml transition. These packages
> > are advi
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Matej Cepl wrote:
> > On Sat 10. December 2005 16:47, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > > I am not sure, whether it is correct, but when applied patch
> > > from http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47835, I
> > > was able to create new version of package which seems to
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Santiago Vila wrote:
severity 345524 serious
forwarded 345524 Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
thanks
On Sun, 1 Jan 2006, Daniel Lublin wrote:
Package: dialog
Version: 1.0-20051219-1
Severity: important
(Perhaps it was broken already in 20051207. In 20051107 it works,
th
Please remember this is bug is being dealt with with util-linux perspective
when reading my answers...
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006, Nate Eldredge wrote:
> Right. Which is kind of painful in the daylight savings case. I can't
Correct. It is *flat out impossible* to fix this issue completely (as in do
e
Package: dspam
Version: 3.6.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
init.d/dspam has:
NAME=dspam
DAEMON=/usr/sbin/$NAME
Yet dspam is not in sbin:
terminus:~/dspam-cvs/dspam# dpkg -L dspam|grep sbin
terminus:~/dspam-cvs/dspam#
terminus:~/dspam-cvs/dspam# which dspam
/usr/bi
Package: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.38+1.39-WIP-2005.12.10-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on most arches with the
following error:
CC /build/buildd/e2fsprogs-1.38+1.39-WIP-2005.12.10/e2fsck/profile.c
/build/buildd/e2fsprogs-1.38+1.39-WIP-2005.12.10/e2fsck/profile.c:70:
OHURA Makoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Bug#317610: Intention to NMU
> Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 02:14:31 +0100
>> > I think that it would be more important to get out a working version
>> > of AUCTeX >= 11.80 since that already includes preview-latex
Hi,
Version 5.0.16 is also crashing, but with more info in syslog.
Without the delayed the query works fine.
On another 5.0.16 server the query also works fine so maybe a bit of
load is needed.
CREATE TABLE `xwi_login_failures` (
`ipa` int(11) NOT NULL default '0',
`gsku` int(11) NOT NULL
Package: isdnutils
Version: 1:3.8.2005-12-06-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package still has a build on xlibs-dev. This has been
removed as announced on:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html
This means your package is now failing to build.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
- --
Luk Claes - http://people
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint
tags 326282 -pending
thanks
The pending tag has been set on this bug since September; the tag means that
an upload will be happening *soon*, which isn't the case here. Removing the
tag.
Ilya, if you could tell developers where to get the source package for ysm
(the URL mentioned in the bug repor
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint
Package: swisswatch
Version: 0.6-11
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package still has a build on xlibs-dev. This has been
removed as announced on:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html
This means your package is now failing to build.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint
Package: octave-forge
Version: 2005.06.13-7
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package still has a build on xlibs-dev. This has been
removed as announced on:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html
This means your package is now failing to build.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Package: mtink
Version: 1.0.12-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package still has a build on xlibs-dev. This has been
removed as announced on:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html
This means your package is now failing to build.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint
reopen 318808
thanks
This package is empty again thus breaks all applications using it.
pbx_bullfrog:/usr/src# dpkg -L libcapi20-3
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/libcapi20-3
/usr/share/doc/libcapi20-3/copyright
/usr/share/doc/libcapi20-3/changelog.Debian.gz
/usr/share/lintian
/u
Package: hdbc-sqlite3
Version: 0.99.0.0
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
Building HDBC-sqlite3-0.99.0.0...
cd testsrc && ghc --make -package mtl -package HUnit -package MissingH -package
HDBC -lsqlite3 ../dist/build/hdbc-sqlite3-helper.o -fglasgow-
Package: aspectc++
Version: 0.99+1.0pre2-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is trying to make a shared library without
using -fPIC. This fails on some arches, and is also a
violation of policy section 10.2. Note that it also says
that static libraries should be made without -fPIC.
>From the
Tags 345067 + patch
thanks
Hi Jonas and Erik, ...
First let me tell you that i think this hack is absolutely not the way to
solve this, the right way would be to fix the via driver, and it is a kernel
bug, not a yaird bug, so please don't add ugly yaird hacks like that to hide
kernel bugs, especi
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 05:19:36PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Your package is failing to build with the following error:
Hi Kurt,
Thanks for the report. Looks like I accidentally forgot to remove
-package MissingH from the Makefile after I removed that dependency from
the tests. I'll upload a
tags 344762 experimental
thanks
Le Sunday 25 December 2005 à 22:23:15, Kurt Roeckx a écrit:
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 09:17:54PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > If you then use dh_shlibdeps with the -L and -l options, it
> > should properly add the required Depends for your other packages,
> > and
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 03:32:40AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> - a handful of packages that still build-depend on ocaml-3.08.3 or similar,
> and require sourceful uploads for the ocaml transition. These packages
> are advi, approx, camlrpc, cduce, cryptokit, lablgtk, missinglib, mlgtk,
>
Package: asterisk-chan-capi
Version: 0.3.5-12
Severity: grave
Asterisk 1.2.1 doesn't start anymore because of chan-capi:
Jan 1 19:43:31 WARNING[29872] loader.c:
/usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_capi.so: undefined symbol: ast_pthread_create
Jan 1 19:43:31 WARNING[29872] loader.c: Loading module ch
Hi
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 04:20:12PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
>
> Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
> you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
> patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
You are welcome to do
Package: yelp
Version: 2.10.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
yelp no longer displays any help topics in the browser window.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (750, 'testing'), (650, 'unstable'), (600, 'stable'),
Subject: xmms: Uninstallable package
Package: xmms
Version: 1.2.10+cvs20050809-4
Severity: grave
Last xmms update came with a surprise to me.
(Leyendo la base de datos ...
56370 ficheros y directorios instalados actualmente.)
Preparando para reemplazar xmms 1.2.10+cvs20050809-4 (usando
xmms_1.2
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Let's go over the way things work, and see how we can fix them back so that
they work correctly. Please bear with me while I go over the entire
problem, and feel free to correct any mistakes I make.
Reading manpage tzset(3) before you rea
Hi,
Ok, the situation is a bit more clear now... The problem is that erlang's
build system assumes that sparc automatically means ultrasparc and (if
hipe is enabled) automatically turns on all the ultrasparc-specific
optimizations. That's a problem, because we, at this point, still support
th
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
> you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
> patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
thanks.
however, i'll make an upload this afternoon c
Package: gnubg
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
The gnubg manual is covered by the GFDL and must move to non-free unless
I can convince upstream to change the licensing terms. This will be
dealt with in the next upload.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT p
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 11:25:02PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Kurt Roeckx said:
> > xlibs should get removed, so I think it should be a Conflicts.
>
> Surely nothing so drastic as removing xlibs is necessary for moving a
> file between packages? The versioned confli
This one time, at band camp, Kurt Roeckx said:
> xlibs should get removed, so I think it should be a Conflicts.
Surely nothing so drastic as removing xlibs is necessary for moving a
file between packages? The versioned conflicts/replaces/etc magic is
probably all that's necessary.
--
--
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 05:09:14PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: mtink
> Version: 1.0.12-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package still has a build on xlibs-dev. This has been
> removed as announced on:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html
>
Package: imlib11-dev
Version: 1.9.14-26
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package has a dependency on xlibs-dev which has been removed
as annouced on:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html
This is now causing build failures for packages that have a build
dependency on imli
This one time, at band camp, Kurt Roeckx said:
> On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 11:25:02PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This one time, at band camp, Kurt Roeckx said:
> > > xlibs should get removed, so I think it should be a Conflicts.
> >
> > Surely nothing so drastic as removing xlibs is necessary fo
Package: plan
Version: 1.9-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package still has a build dependency on xlibs-dev. This has
been removed as announced on:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html
This means your package is now failing to build.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Installed xmms_1.2.10+cvs20050809-5 in my machine (i686) and got no
problems:
(Leyendo la base de datos ...
108120 ficheros y directorios instalados actualmente.)
Preparando para reemplazar xmms 1.2.10+cvs20050809-4 (usando
xmms_1.2.10+cvs20050809-5_i386.deb) ...
Desempaquetando el reemplazo d
On 22:18 Sun 01 Jan 2006, Daniel Franganillo wrote:
> Version: 1.2.10+cvs20050809-4
>
> Last xmms update came with a surprise to me.
After uploading -5 revision of xmms, I did an upgrade of all my packages
as a common way, and I didn't get this.
> (Leyendo la base de datos ...
> 56370 ficheros y
On Sunday 01 January 2006 17:41, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ok, the situation is a bit more clear now... The problem is that erlang's
> build system assumes that sparc automatically means ultrasparc and (if
> hipe is enabled) automatically turns on all the ultrasparc-specific
> optimizations. That's a pr
49 matches
Mail list logo
