Bug#329358: [bug #14619] find -perm +... broken in 4.2.25

Follow-up Comment #13, bug #14619 (project findutils): Andreas, did you intend both patch files to be applied, or just one of them? (I also must figure out where the upstream perm.texi file comes from) ___ Reply to this item at:

Bug#307299: TWiki.cfg

Could you show us your TWiki.cfg file, please? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#338046: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 07:00:26AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Thanks for your tips, however tetex-bin 2.0.2-31 supposedly used > efmt files; but it doesn't seem to return expected values: > > $ basename `kpsewhich --format fmt tex` > tex.fmt > $ basename `kpsewhich --format fmt latex` > late

Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem still exists

On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 09:30:44AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Kenward Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > > daddy:~# grep TEXFONTMAPS /etc/texmf/texmf.d/* > > /etc/texmf/texmf.d/55Fonts.cnf:% TEXFONTMAPS = > > .;$TEXMF/{fonts/map,}/{$progname,pdftex,dvips,}// > > /etc/texmf/texmf.d/55Fonts

Bug#326961: marked as done (FTBFS: normal.c heap corrution due to table overflow)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:17:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#326961: fixed in iproute 20041019-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#338568: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on ocaml-nox-3.08.3

Package: ocurl Version: 0.2.1-3 Severity: serious pbuilder fails to build ocurl in an unstable chroot on i386: > -> Considering ocaml-nox-3.08.3 >-> Trying ocaml-nox-3.08.3 >-> Cannot install ocaml-nox-3.08.3; apt errors follow: > Reading package lists... > Building dependency tree.

Bug#338567: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on ocaml-nox-3.08.3

Package: omake Version: 0.9.6.5-2-1 Severity: serious pbuilder fails to build omake in an unstable chroot on i386: > -> Considering ocaml-nox-3.08.3 >-> Trying ocaml-nox-3.08.3 >-> Cannot install ocaml-nox-3.08.3; apt errors follow: > Reading package lists... > Building dependency t

Bug#336401: marked as done (Doesn't start on amd64 +patch)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:02:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336401: fixed in gazpacho 0.6.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#336719: marked as done (drupal: Users unable to log out)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:32:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336719: fixed in drupal 4.5.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#188448: marked as done (abuse-sdl: Nothing happens)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:02:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#188448: fixed in abuse-sdl 1:0.7.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#333197: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.12-1-amd64-k8-smp: Cannot keep ide-scsi from loading)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Nov 2005 01:11:06 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line linux-image-2.6.12-1-amd64-k8-smp: Cannot keep ide-scsi from loading has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#333831: Still present in 2.6.14 ?

Hi Simon, We would like to know if your bug (Hangs on boot loading ide-cd) is still present with the 2.6.14-2 packages currently in unstable ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#333067: marked as done (linux-image-k7: System unusable after reboot because rivafb is compiled with debugging enabled.)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Nov 2005 00:52:58 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing, as rivafb is no more built in 2.6.14. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#279689: marked as done (/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.9-1-686: freeze when starting rivafb)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Nov 2005 00:52:58 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing, as rivafb is no more built in 2.6.14. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processed: Fixed in NMU of kaffeine 0.7.1-1.3

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 328738 + fixed Bug#328738: kaffeine: Kaffeine not loading Kaffeine Part Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#328738: proposed patch to fix this bug

* Zack Cerza [Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:44:41 -0500]: > Adeodato Simó wrote: > > Is Modestas' patch OK? > Yeah, sorry for the delay (again). The patch looks perfect. NMU uploaded, final diff attached. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó EM: dato (at) the-barrel.org | PK: DA6AE621 He has never been

Processed: preparing upload

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package saods9 Ignoring bugs not assigned to: saods9 > tag 318042 pending Bug#318042: saods9: FTBFS with gcc-3.4 Tags were: upstream fixed-upstream patch Bug#337452: saods9: FTBFS with gcc-3.4 Tags added: pending > tag 336098 pending Bug#336098: saods

Bug#336098: preparing upload

package saods9 tag 318042 pending tag 336098 pending tag 303665 pending tag 315690 pending tag 303668 pending thanks I'm preparing an upload now which will close the listed bugs. Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE

Processed: Re: Bug#338513: gjdoc: FTBFS: gcc: internal compiler error

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 338513 + upstream Bug#338513: gjdoc: FTBFS: gcc: internal compiler error There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > forwarded 338513 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24572 Bug#338513: gjdoc: FTBFS: gcc: internal compiler error Noted your statement that Bu

Bug#338513: gjdoc: FTBFS: gcc: internal compiler error

tags 338513 + upstream forwarded 338513 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24572 retitle 338513 [PR 24572] [4.0 regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:3983 thanks forwarded two weeks ago without a Debian report. Roland Stigge writes: > Package: gcc-4.0 > Version: 4.0.2-3 > Severity: serious > > Hi,

Bug#337479: marked as done (yaird: should use /usr/bin/perl, not /usr/local/bin/perl)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:48:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337479: fixed in yaird 0.0.11-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#338401: Grep and libpcre

On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 10:10:14PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: >* Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-11 08:59]: >>Version grep_2.5.1.ds1-4 is available now at: >>http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/grep/ > >The current version is ds2-4 though which isn't available yet. Th

Bug#338401: Grep and libpcre

* Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-11 08:59]: > Version grep_2.5.1.ds1-4 is available now at: > http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/grep/ The current version is ds2-4 though which isn't available yet. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/

Bug#338531: marked as done (rosegarden4: uninstallable on x86_64)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:58:46 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338531: rosegarden4: uninstallable on x86_64 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Processed: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 338046 whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer > functions. Bug#338046: whizzytex: FTBFS: einitex not provided anymore by tetex-bin (or elsewhere in sid) Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#338401: Grep and libpcre

On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 06:56:37PM +0100, Information - Informacja wrote: >Confirmed here. It brakes all boots, doesn't matter which kernel. I have >/usr and /usr/lib on 2 partitions. Version grep_2.5.1.ds1-4 is available now at: http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/grep/ Aníbal Monsalve Sa

Bug#338046: Debian Bug#338046: whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions.

retitle 338046 whizzytex: einitex unavailable from tetex and no longer functions. thanks Hi, There is a change in tetex-3.0 Debian package which removes 'initex' 'einitex' commands, and requires 'tex -ini' instead. According to the maintainers, this is an upstream change, and other distribu

Bug#338088: marked as done (h5utils_1.10-2_hppa: FTBFS: ld returned 1 exit status)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:32:18 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338088: fixed in h5utils 1.10-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#338014: marked as done (lsh-utils: lcp depends on lsh)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:32:25 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338014: fixed in lsh-utils 2.0.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#337875: marked as done (classpath - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp//usr/lib/classpath/libgjsmalsa.so': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:32:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337875: fixed in classpath 2:0.19-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Fixed in NMU of yacas 1.0.57-2.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 266283 + fixed Bug#266283: yacas: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: there are no arguments to `NrItems' that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of `NrItems' must be available Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > tag 332298 + fixed Bug#332298: yaca

Bug#338413: Package is not available on ftp.debian.org

On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 01:20:30PM +0100, Dr. Tilo Levante wrote: >Hi, > >the fixed package is not available on the ftp server. It is available now at: http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/grep/ It was available not so long ago at: http://incoming.debian.org/ >It was uploaded with low prio

Bug#338537: mffm-fftw: file conflict between mffm-fftw1c2 and mffm-fftw1

Package: mffm-fftw1c2 Version: 1.6-1 Severity: serious Justification: breaks upgrades When testing mffm-fftw-dev with piuparts, specifically upgrades from sarge via etch to sid, I get the following error: Selecting previously deselected package mffm-fftw1c2. Unpacking mffm-fftw1c2 (from .../m

Processed: hmm, actually send to control

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 328590 normal Bug#328590: Should these packages be orphaned? Severity set to `normal'. > reassign 328590 wnpp Bug#328590: Should these packages be orphaned? Bug reassigned from package `dbskkd-cdb,skkdic,skksearch' to `wnpp'. > clone 328590 -

Bug#338532: sfs: FTBFS: compile error in rpctypes.h: declaration of 'set' must be available

Package: sfs Version: 1:0.8-0+pre20050819.1-2 Severity: serious Hi, building the package sfs in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] echo '#include "sysconf.h"'; \ echo '#

Bug#338531: rosegarden4: uninstallable on x86_64

Package: rosegarden4 Version: 1.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable rosegarden4 still depends on old libs : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LANG=en_US sudo aptitude install rosegarden4 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading extended state information

Bug#335885: URL with the patch

The problem has been already fixed upstream: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-09/msg00073.html regards, Davide signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#338529: mcvs: FTBFS: dangling symlink /usr/lib/clisp/base/lispinit.mem

Package: clisp Version: 1:2.35-8 Severity: serious Hi, building the package mcvs 1.0.13-9 in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] if [ ! -d "." ]; then \ mkdir -p "."; \ fi if [ -z "" ]

Processed: More cleanup

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 335885 patch Bug#335885: mklibs: [powerpc] failfs when building the gtk d-i. Tags were: d-i Bug#326103: binutils: gcc -u hits ld segfault w/ certain -u options Bug#335713: mklibs: [powerpc] failfs when building the gtk d-i. Tags added: patch > cl

Bug#87371: marked as done (does not support Unix98 PTYs)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:47:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#87371: fixed in ttysnoop 0.12d-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processed: some cleanup

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 326103 serious Bug#326103: binutils: gcc -u hits ld segfault w/ certain -u options Severity set to `serious'. > severity 335713 serious Bug#335713: mklibs: [powerpc] failfs when building the gtk d-i. Severity set to `serious'. > severity 335

Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10

Hilmar Preusse wrote: > On 07.11.05 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >>On 05.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> >>>Hilmar Preusse wrote: >>> On 03.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > Hi, > > >I forgot to mention that the file tetex.postinst.XXgqP8eU was >

Bug#338513: gjdoc: FTBFS: gcc: internal compiler error

Package: gcc-4.0 Version: 4.0.2-3 Severity: serious Hi, building the package gjdoc 0.7.6-1 in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 and sparc results in: = [...] gnu/classpath/tools/gjdoc/expr/.libs/JavaLexer

Bug#334613: [SPAM?]: Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10

On 10.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > > If the user now refuses to replace the local version by that one > > from the maint (which is the default) fmtutil now starts creating > > formats with the old configuration. ---> *bamm* > > T

Processed: Correcting bug history

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package grep Ignoring bugs not assigned to: grep > # The bug was introduced in 2.5.1.ds2-3 with > # > # * Compiled with libpcre3 to enable perl regular expressions. > # Closes: #203109: perl mode non-functional, should not be documented > # C

Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem still exists

On 08.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > clone 334613 -1 > found -1 3.0-10.1 > retitle -1 Should make sure the TEXFONTPATH setting is correct > severity -1 normal > submitter -1 Kenward Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > stop > I guess you forgot to put [EMAIL PROTECTED] into Bcc. At leas

Bug#334613: [SPAM?]: Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10

Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In preinst we move the old 00tetex.cnf to 01tetex.cnf. At any time > dpkg comes along and finds out, that 01tetex.cnf has been changed (as > it differs from that one in the package). It's ucf-managed: $ grep fmt.d /var/lib/ucf/hashfile 757459dda86e1bd3

Bug#338465: (grep dynamically linked with libpcre, fails before /usr is mounted)

On 2005-11-10 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Version: 2.5.1.ds2-3 > On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 07:54:10AM -0500, Patrick M. Jordan wrote: > > Apologies; the bug was already fixed soon after release, and > > the report archived. Please close this bug. > Closing. Afaict this bug is not

Processed: Re: Bug#338500: libpcre3 install libraries in /usr/lib which are needed early in booting

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 338500 wishlist Bug#338500: libpcre3 install libraries in /usr/lib which are needed early in booting Severity set to `wishlist'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adminis

Bug#338500: libpcre3 install libraries in /usr/lib which are needed early in booting

severity 338500 wishlist thanks On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 09:34:31AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Package: libpcre3 > Version: 6.4-1 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system > libpcre3 install its libraries in /usr/lib: > /usr/lib/libpcre.so.3.12.0 > /usr/lib/libpcrecpp

Bug#338500: libpcre3 install libraries in /usr/lib which are needed early in booting

On 2005-11-10 Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: libpcre3 > Version: 6.4-1 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system > libpcre3 install its libraries in /usr/lib: > /usr/lib/libpcre.so.3.12.0 > /usr/lib/libpcrecpp.so.0.0.0 > /usr/lib/libpcreposix.so.3.12

Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10

On 07.11.05 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On 05.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Hilmar Preusse wrote: > > > On 03.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, > > >> I forgot to mention that the file tetex.postinst.XXgqP8eU was > > >> reproduced by another setup as the orgi

Bug#338401: Grep and libpcre

Confirmed here. It brakes all boots, doesn't matter which kernel. I have /usr and /usr/lib on 2 partitions. -- Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#333958: Patch for #333958, Intent to NMU

On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 06:47:33PM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 05:05:17PM +0100, Wouter van Heyst wrote: > > In the past Masayuki has mentioned lack of time, if that is still the > > case, I'm willing to take over (or become part of a team), as I'm now > > much more able t

Bug#338465: marked as done (grep dynamically linked with libpcre, fails before /usr is mounted)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:33:16 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338465: (grep dynamically linked with libpcre, fails before /usr is mounted) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#328590: Orphaning

severity 328590 normal reassign 328590 wnpp clone 328590 -1 -2 retitle 328590 O: dbskkd-cdb -- The fastest dictionary server for SKK retitle -1 O: skkdic -- SKK Dictionary (SKK-JISYO.L) retitle -2 O: skksearch -- SKK dictionary server handling multiple dictionaries thanks Since you haven't reacted

Bug#338500: libpcre3 install libraries in /usr/lib which are needed early in booting

Package: libpcre3 Version: 6.4-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system libpcre3 install its libraries in /usr/lib: /usr/lib/libpcre.so.3.12.0 /usr/lib/libpcrecpp.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib/libpcreposix.so.3.12.0 However, crucial system binaries needed at boot time depend on it, progr

Processed: openssl: marking bugs pending.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 338284 + pending Bug#338284: libssl0.9.8: shlibs file not strict enough There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tag 338313 + pending Bug#338313: zlib wanted when building against openssl There were no tags set. Bug#337873: hula - FTBFS: missi

Processed: Fixed in NMU of xpostit 3.3.1-8.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 259938 + fixed Bug#259938: xpostit: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'malloc' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adminis

Bug#337479: yaird: should use /usr/bin/perl, not /usr/local/bin/perl

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 23:28:40 +0100 Erik van Konijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:20:47PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 08:16:08PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote: > > > On sam, 2005-11-05 at 16:31

Processed: grep: fails in early boot

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 338465 critical Bug#338465: grep dynamically linked with libpcre, fails before /usr is mounted Severity set to `critical'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: Re: Bug#335511: xpostit: "Show All Notes" does not show anything

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 335511 normal Bug#335511: xpostit: "Show All Notes" does not show anything Severity set to `normal'. > merge 335511 118332 Bug#118332: xpostit: clicking on a note's close button makes it dissapear Bug#335511: xpostit: "Show All Notes" does not

Bug#338465: grep: fails in early boot

severity 338465 critical thanks Package: grep Version: 2.5.1.ds2-3 Severity: critical Justification: The system failed to boot, various modules did not load Hi, On boot, grep failed with errors about being unable to load libpcre.so -- not surprising, since /usr is not available. I had

Bug#335511: xpostit: "Show All Notes" does not show anything

severity 335511 normal merge 335511 118332 thanks Works for me (fvwm). Personally, I'd just close the bugs... Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#259938: xpostit: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'malloc'

Re: Taketoshi Sano in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ah..., sorry, no. Maybe it will need other weeks. > I hope to clean up my pending Debian tasks before the end of this year, > but if someone can help me by NMU, I'll appreciate it. Hi, here's the NMU diff: debdiff xpostit_3.3.1-8.dsc /srv/pbuilder/re

Bug#338460: rfb: Uninstallable due to libxclass0 -> libxclass0c2

Hi On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 12:45:22PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Package: rfb > Severity: grave > Version: 0.6.1-11 > > Hi > > rfb is uninstallable as libxclass0 has been renamed to libxclass0c2 for > the C++ ABI transition. This bug is *not* f

Bug#328738: proposed patch to fix this bug

Adeodato Simó wrote: > Is Modestas' patch OK? Yeah, sorry for the delay (again). The patch looks perfect. Thanks, Zack

Processed: Fixed in NMU of entity 1.0.1-7.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 285693 + fixed Bug#285693: entity: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > tag 328154 + fixed Bug#328154: entity: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev There were no tags set. Tags ad

Bug#332829: writes outside of buildd directory

It looks to me like all those errors are trying to read and write to the user's home directory. Some buildds don't have those and packages shouldn't be doing that at build-time anyway. The build directory is /build/buildd. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <

Bug#338485: mozilla-locale-it: Uninstallable due to versioned dep on old mozilla-browser

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: mozilla-locale-it Severity: grave Version: 1.7.5-3 Hi mozilla-locale-it is not installable as it depends on mozilla-browser << 2:1.7.5.1, but testing has already mozilla-browser 2:1.7.12-1 Cheers Luk - -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.

Bug#338483: vimacs: Uninstallable in sid due to versioned conflicts on vim

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: vimacs Severity: grave Version: 0.95-1.2 Hi vimacs is uninstallable in sid as it depends on vim >= 1:6.3, but conflicts on vim >= 1:6.4 while vim has version 1:6.4-001+2 in sid. Cheers Luk - -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk -

Bug#338482: hunspell - FTBFS: tests timeouts

Package: hunspell Version: 1.1.1-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of hunspell_1.1.1-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] > PASS: compound.test > make[3]: *** [check-TESTS] Terminated > make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Terminated > ma

Bug#285693: rc bugs

Hi, NMU patch is attached. debdiff entity_1.0.1-7.dsc entity_1.0.1-7.1.dsc entity-1.0.1/debian/changelog | 14 -- entity-1.0.1/debian/control |2 +- libentitynjs/iostream.c |4 ++-- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff -u entity-1.0.1/debian/chang

Bug#285624: marked as done (dedit: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'restarted' follows non-static declaration)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:10:58 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing dedit bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Processed: severity 338333 wishlist

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 338333 wishlist Bug#338333: emacs-goodies-el: Some Lisp packages are useless without non-free software Severity set to `wishlist'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admin

Bug#338333: emacs-goodies-el: Some Lisp packages are useless without non-free software

Peter S Galbraith wrote: I disagree with this interpretation. I certainly didn't think of it that way when I packaged them. While matlab and maple are certainly non-free software, the elisp files don't support these software directly. There are the autoloaded commands `matlab-shell' and `cma

Bug#338046: whizzytex: FTBFS: einitex not provided anymore by tetex-bin (or elsewhere in sid)

Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > >> > whizzytex users reported that tetex no longer etex. >> > I've not quite investigated the problem; but I would like >> > to check the intention. >> > >> > Is the intention to remove 'etex' 'einitex' commands? >> > >> > From the 'NEWS' file, it

Processed: Re: arla: kalog segfaults on AMD64

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 282990 serious Bug#282990: arla: kalog segfaults on AMD64 Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#338046: whizzytex: FTBFS: einitex not provided anymore by tetex-bin (or elsewhere in sid)

Hi, > > whizzytex users reported that tetex no longer etex. > > I've not quite investigated the problem; but I would like > > to check the intention. > > > > Is the intention to remove 'etex' 'einitex' commands? > > > > From the 'NEWS' file, it looks like 'pdfetex' is the default now, > > so invo

Processed: Re: device nodes with udev?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 87371 serious Bug#87371: does not work with devfs Severity set to `serious'. > retitle 87371 does not support Unix98 PTYs Bug#87371: does not work with devfs Changed Bug title. > tag 87371 patch upstream Bug#87371: does not support Unix98 PTY

Bug#338470: typo3-site-installer: no typo3 site is installed

Package: typo3-site-installer Version: 0.90 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (1100, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash K

Bug#338469: libatomic-ops_1.0-3(m68k/unstable/vault13): FTBFS on m68k

/m68k 69 | Build started at 20051110-0646 | ** [...] | ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: | Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0) [...] | Checking correctness of source dependencies... | Toolchain pack

Bug#338465: (grep dynamically linked with libpcre, fails before /usr is mounted)

Apologies; the bug was already fixed soon after release, and the report archived. Please close this bug. Best regards, -- Patrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#338465: grep dynamically linked with libpcre, fails before /usr is mounted

Package: grep Version: 2.5.1.ds2-2 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss grep grep_2.5.1.ds2-2 is linked dynamically against libpcre, which lives in /usr/lib. This causes the bin to fail to execute before /usr is mounted. This is grave because: grep is used in early script

Bug#338413: Package is not available on ftp.debian.org

Hi, the fixed package is not available on the ftp server. It was uploaded with low priority , maybe this is the reason. greetings tilo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#338046: whizzytex: FTBFS: einitex not provided anymore by tetex-bin (or elsewhere in sid)

Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > >> > Running INITEX=einitex ... ./checkconfig: line 115: einitex: command not >> > found >> > >> > *** Error: >> > >> > Command failed: >> > >> > einitex '&latex' dummy > initex.log && [ -f dummy.$FMT ] >> > >> > einitex seems to ha

Processed: Merge

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 337143 314385 Bug#314385: gworkspace.app: Loader error when launching GWorkspace Bug#337143: viewpdf.app: ViewPDF symbol lookup error: ViewPDF: symbol lookup error: [long/path] libgnustep-back: undefined symbol: FTC_Manager_Lookup_Size Bug#320958

Processed: Re: Bug#338334: tetex-doc: Debian changelog is missing

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 338334 pending Bug#338334: tetex-doc: Debian changelog is missing There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Deb

Bug#338334: tetex-doc: Debian changelog is missing

tags 338334 pending stop Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: tetex-doc > Version: 3.0-10 > Severity: serious > > The Debian changelog is missing in the /usr/share/doc/tetex-doc > directory. Please add it there as mandated by section 12.7 of the > Policy Manual. -- Frank Küster

Bug#338460: rfb: Uninstallable due to libxclass0 -> libxclass0c2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: rfb Severity: grave Version: 0.6.1-11 Hi rfb is uninstallable as libxclass0 has been renamed to libxclass0c2 for the C++ ABI transition. This bug is *not* fixeable without source changes (binNMUs) as there is an explicit versioned dependency

Bug#329838: marked as done (zinc-compiler: ftbfs [sparc] run.nw:212: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:17:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#329838: fixed in zinc-compiler 1.0.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#327492: marked as done (Depends on unavailable library libgmp3)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:17:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327492: fixed in zinc-compiler 1.0.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#338456: php-clamav: Uninstallable due to not existing dep phpapi-20020918-zts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: php-clamav Severity: grave Version: 0.3.0-1 Hi php-clamav is not installable as there is no package providing phpapi-20020918-zts. There are only packages providing phpapi-20041030 and phpapi-20050606 in unstable, no package provides phpapi-

Bug#338455: python2.3-kde3: uninstallable : dependency problem

Package: python2.3-kde3 Version: 3.11.3-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, python2.3-kde3 depends on kdelibs4. kdelibs4 does not exist anymore in Sid repositories. Probably that the dependency should be on kdelibs. It's the same for the libqt3c102-mt dependency. The

Bug#338334: tetex-doc: Debian changelog is missing

Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 09.11.05 Sven Joachim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Hi, > >> Package: tetex-doc >> Version: 3.0-10 >> Severity: serious >> >> The Debian changelog is missing in the /usr/share/doc/tetex-doc >> directory. Please add it there as mandated by section 12

Bug#338452: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-nb: Uninstallable due to versioned dep on old version

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-nb Severity: grave Version: 0.7.2-1 Hi mozilla-thunderbird-locale-nb is not installable as it depends on mozilla-thunderbird << 0.8.0 while testing has already 1.0.7-3. Cheers Luk - -- Luk Claes - http://people.

Bug#303863: marked as done (qucs: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'Node*' to 'int' loses precision)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:32:10 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#303863: fixed in qucs 0.0.7-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#338432: chasen: cannot open shared library

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OHURA Makoto wrote: > tag 338432 patch > thanks > > Hi. Hi > From: OHURA Makoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Bug#338432: chasen: cannot open shared library > Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:09:47 +0900 (JST) > >> So, you probably made some mistake a

Bug#337994: sbcl: ftbfs [sparc] /usr/bin/clisp: No such file or directory

On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 09:27:23PM +0100, Peter Van Eynde wrote: > How comes that there is no /usr/bin/clisp if clisp is installed? Is the clisp > package broken for non-x86 architectures? The errors on other architectures that I looked at the logs for were different, as was my pbuilder log. (Wh

Bug#338413: marked as done (Boot failure on system with separate / and /usr partitions)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:14:50 +1100 (EST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in version grep_2.5.1.ds2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

  1   2   >