Bug#334920: ** PROBLEM alert - lonemountain/IMAPS is CRITICAL ** (fwd)

2005-10-28 Thread Stefan Hornburg
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 06:55:33 +0200 (CEST) Ondrej Jombik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > Please provide some downgrade package links, this cannot leave in this state. > > IMAPS is not working. Just create a symbolic link libz.so in /usr/lib pointing to libz.so.1 Bye Racke -- Li

Bug#336281: FTBFS: Missing declaration of accumulate

2005-10-28 Thread Matt Kraai
Package: mcmcpack Version: 0.6-5-1 Severity: serious pbuilder fails to build mcmcpack in an unstable chroot on i386: > g++ -I/usr/lib/R/include-DSCYTHE_COMPILE_DIRECT -DSCYTHE_NO_RANGE -fPIC > -g -O2 -c MCMCdistn.cc -o MCMCdistn.o > la.cc: In function 'SCYTHE::Matrix SCYTHE::selif(const S

Bug#336280: FTBFS: Unable to stat doc/dtd.html

2005-10-28 Thread Matt Kraai
Package: logidee-tools Version: 1.2.4-2 Severity: serious pbuilder fails to build logidee-tools in an unstable chroot on i386: > xsltproc --xinclude --stringparam selection "none" --stringparam cycle > "false" --stringparam charte "gfdl" --stringparam trainer "false" > --stringparam lang "en" -

Bug#336279: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on dvips

2005-10-28 Thread Matt Kraai
Package: magicfilter Version: 1.2-58 Severity: serious Tags: patch pbuilder fails to build magicfilter in an unstable chroot on i386: > -> Considering dvips >-> Trying dvips >-> Cannot install dvips; apt errors follow: > Reading package lists... > Building dependency tree... > E: Pa

Bug#336278: FTBFS: No match for operator<

2005-10-28 Thread Matt Kraai
Package: maxdb-7.5.00 Version: 7.5.00.30-3 Severity: serious pbuilder fails to build maxdb-7.5.00 in an unstable chroot on i386: > Join_Execute.cpp slow > /tmp/buildd/maxdb-7.5.00-7.5.00.30/MaxDB_DEV/sys/wrk/incl/SAPDB/DataAcce\ > ss/Data_Chain.hpp: In member function 'void Data_Chain::WriteToTr

Bug#336277: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on gcc-3.3

2005-10-28 Thread Matt Kraai
Package: mindi-kernel Version: 2.4.27-2 Severity: serious pbuilder fails to build mindi-kernel in an unstable chroot on i386: > gcc-3.3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -o scripts/mkdep > scripts/mkdep.c > make[3]: gcc-3.3: Command not found -- Matt signature.asc Descriptio

Bug#336276: FTBFS: Unable to run dh_installxsp

2005-10-28 Thread Matt Kraai
Package: monodoc Version: 1.1.9-1 Severity: serious pbuilder fails to build monodoc in an unstable chroot on i386: > dh_installxsp > make: dh_installxsp: Command not found -- Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: Fixed in upload of kernel-package 10.002 to experimental

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 335993 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#335993: kernel-package: Problem with kernel_version.mk causes build fauilure Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. D

Bug#304431: marked as done (tspc_2.1.1-4(mips/unstable): FTBFS with -rsudo)

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:17:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#304431: fixed in tspc 2.1.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gcc-2.95 2.95.4.ds15-22.1

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 323512 + fixed Bug#323512: FTBFS: Unable to find libstdc++.a.2.10.0 Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > tag 326506 + fixed Bug#326506: gcc-2.95: ftbfs [sparc] reorg.c:384: error: invalid lvalue in increment Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > t

Bug#288305: qps: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): non-local variable ' sigtab []' uses anonymous type

2005-10-28 Thread Hanno 'Rince' Wagner
Hi, Rob Weir schrieb am 29. October 2005: > Do you you think you'll have time to upload this fix soon, or would you > prefer to have someone NMU it? Please do an NMU (especially since I thought I orphaned that package two years ago or longer... Ciao, Hanno -- | Hanno Wagner | Member of the H

Bug#329364: marked as done (ruby1.8_1.8.3-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k)

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:02:12 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#329364: fixed in ruby1.8 1.8.3-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Ted Kisner
> OK. But does it still spew warnings and crash as described > by Leopold? It displays the following errors, but does not crash. This may simply because I've not tried to *do* anything with the program. Is there a sample file somewhere that I could try to open, to confirm that it crashes? -T

Bug#334920: ** PROBLEM alert - lonemountain/IMAPS is CRITICAL ** (fwd)

2005-10-28 Thread Ondrej Jombik
Hello Please provide some downgrade package links, this cannot leave in this state. IMAPS is not working. Ondrej -- /\ Ondrej Jombik - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://nepto.sk - ICQ #122428216 //\\ Platon Group - open source software development - http://platon.sk //\\ 10 types of people: t

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 12:39:07PM -0700, Ted Kisner wrote: > after installing nvidia-glx-dev, I can successfully build the package and > install. Build log is attached. I can run the program and use the menus, > etc. Not sure what to do with the program, so I can't really test > anything ;-)

Processed: NMU patch

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package gcc-2.95 Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gcc-2.95 > tags 326506 + patch Bug#326506: gcc-2.95: ftbfs [sparc] reorg.c:384: error: invalid lvalue in increment There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please co

Bug#323512: NMU patch

2005-10-28 Thread Blars Blarson
package gcc-2.95 tags 326506 + patch thanks Attached is the NMU patch to fix these ftbfs bugs. It builds on sparc, I'll test the build on i386 before uploading. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, f

Bug#328707: kernel-source-2.4.27: Compile fails

2005-10-28 Thread Horms
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 08:26:45PM -0400, micah wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Björn Andersson wrote: > > > {standard input}: Assembler messages: > > {standard input}:737: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' > > {standard input}:738: Error: suffix or operands

Bug#336274: libcryptokit-ocaml-dev: Inconsistent assumptions over interface Numerix

2005-10-28 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Package: libcryptokit-ocaml-dev Version: 1.2-8 Severity: grave The package Numerix (libnumerix-ocaml-dev) is required when linking to to package Cryptokit (libcryptokit-ocaml-dev), but when I try to link I get: ocamlopt -o test -I /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/numerix -I /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/crypt

Bug#335976: marked as done (/etc/init.d/nvidia-kernel contains bashisms)

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:02:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335976: fixed in nvidia-kernel-common 20051028+1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#335927: marked as done (FTBFS with libsmbclient-dev 3.0.20b-2)

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:35:47 -0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in upload of gnome-vfs2 2.12.1.1-1 to experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Bug#335214: marked as done (gnome-vfs2: FTBFS: smb-method.c:1489: error: 'struct _SMBCCTX' has no member named 'close')

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:35:47 -0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in upload of gnome-vfs2 2.12.1.1-1 to experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Processed: KCheckGmail seems to be working

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity #336242 normal Bug#336242: kcheckgmail: does not report new message count Severity set to `normal'. > tags #336242 + moreinfo sid Bug#336242: kcheckgmail: does not report new message count There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo, sid > t

Bug#334319: ruby-v4l - FTBFS: missing build-dependency

2005-10-28 Thread Rob Weir
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 08:33:55AM +0200, Bastian Blank said > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > > > Automatic build of ruby-v4l_0.1.2-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 > [...] > > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), r

Bug#336268: libghc6-http-dev: Does not install with current GHC version

2005-10-28 Thread Aaron Tomb
Package: libghc6-http-dev Version: 0.4.20050430-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The libghc6-http-dev package is uninstallable with the current GHC version in unstable. It depends on ghc6 (>= 6.4), ghc6 (<< 6.4+), while the current GHC version is 6.4.1-1. -- System Inform

Bug#288305: qps: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): non-local variable ' sigtab []' uses anonymous type

2005-10-28 Thread Rob Weir
Hi Hanno, On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 12:20:45AM +0100, Andreas Jochens said > Package: qps > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > When building 'qps' on amd64 with gcc-4.0, > I get the following error: > > g++ -g -O2 -Wall -W -Wconversion -I/usr/include/qt3-c -o qps.o qps.C > qps.C:739: error: n

Bug#314816: schism: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'charcache' follows non-static declaration

2005-10-28 Thread Rob Weir
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 04:06:30PM +0200, Simon Richter said > Hi, > > Rob Weir wrote: > > >>draw-char.c:63: error: static declaration of 'charcache' follows > >>non-static declaration > >>./include/it.h:163: error: previous declaration of 'charcache' was here > > >with gcc 4.0 as the default c

Bug#259829: seesat5: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement

2005-10-28 Thread Rob Weir
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 11:08:29PM +0200, Andreas Jochens said > When building 'seesat5' with gcc-3.4 I get the following error: > > make[1]: Entering directory `/seesat5-0.90.10' > gcc -c seesat.c > gcc -c driver.c > driver.c: In function `main': > driver.c:306: warning: return type of 'main' is

Processed: Re: sim: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'const char*' to 'unsigned int' loses precision

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 300930 fixed Bug#300930: sim: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'const char*' to 'unsigned int' loses precision Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking s

Processed: Re: Re: Bug#328004: A rebuild ist just fine indeed.

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 328004 fixed Bug#328004: sim: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Tags were: sid Tags added: fixed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administ

Processed: Re: zaptel: FTBFS: missing or incorrect directory modexamples/

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 329084 unreproducible Bug#329084: zaptel: FTBFS: missing or incorrect directory modexamples/ Tags were: experimental Tags added: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syst

Processed: Re: Unsatisfiable build-dep libsnmp5-dev

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 333943 patch Bug#333943: Unsatisfiable build-dep libsnmp5-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#328004: Re: Bug#328004: A rebuild ist just fine indeed.

2005-10-28 Thread Rob Weir
tags 328004 fixed thanks On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 07:39:41PM +0200, Marc Haber said > On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 01:58:55PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > NMUable version on http://people.debian.org/~zugschlus/sim. > > ... and in the upload queue for 3 days delayed uploads. Which fixes #328004. -rob

Bug#328924: silc-toolkit: FTBFS: make: execvp: /silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/control.sh: Permission denied

2005-10-28 Thread Rob Weir
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 10:50:51AM +0200, Andreas Jochens said > When building 'silc-toolkit' on amd64/unstable, > I get the following error: > > # get proper name for shlib package > /silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/control.sh /silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/control > /silc-toolkit-0.9.12/lib/.libs > mak

Bug#333943: Unsatisfiable build-dep libsnmp5-dev

2005-10-28 Thread Rob Weir
tags 333943 patch thanks Hi Arthur, On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 05:34:01PM +0200, Luk Claes said > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Package: wmnd > Severity: serious > Version: 0.4.11-1 > > Hi > > Please update your build dependency on libsnmp5-dev to libsnmp9-dev | > libsnmp-de

Bug#333052: Bug#333522: possible problem cause: wait4(-1)

2005-10-28 Thread Rusty Russell
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 15:08 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Oct 28, Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The latter is the simplest option. Please try this patch (it will be in > > the next release, too). If it seems to work, please ack. > No luck. Please send complete log. I might n

Bug#329084: zaptel: FTBFS: missing or incorrect directory modexamples/

2005-10-28 Thread Rob Weir
tags 329084 unreproducible thanks On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 08:09:22PM +1000, Rob Weir said > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 03:09:45PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas said > > Package: zaptel > > Severity: serious > > Justification: Fails to build from source > > Version: 1:1.2.0-0beta1-1 > > Tags: experimental

Bug#326641: wipl: FTBFS: 'parent' was not declared in this scope

2005-10-28 Thread Rob Weir
Hi Carlo, On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 07:32:15PM +0200, Andreas Jochens said > Package: wipl > Version: 20020601-10 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > > When building 'wipl' on unstable, I get the following error: > > In file included from /usr/include/arpa/inet.h:23, > from common

Bug#303203: tela: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): 'Tshort::Tshort(const Tshort&)' is private

2005-10-28 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 02:11:21PM +0200, Andreas Jochens said > When building 'tela' on amd64/unstable with gcc-4.0, > I get the following error: > > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux/4.0.0/../../../../include/c++/4.0.0/backward/backward_warning.h:32:2: > warning: #warning This file includes at least on

Bug#300930: sim: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'const char*' to 'unsigned int' loses precision

2005-10-28 Thread Rob Weir
tags 300930 fixed thanks On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 07:36:08PM +0100, Andreas Jochens said > Package: sim > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > When building 'sim' on amd64 with gcc-4.0, > I get the following error: > > if /bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --mode=compile --tag=CXX g++ > -DHAVE_CONFIG_

Bug#294377: ttt: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): unrecognized command line option "-fwritable-strings"

2005-10-28 Thread Rob Weir
Hi Thomas, On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:48:32PM +0100, Andreas Jochens said > When building 'ttt' on amd64 with gcc-4.0, > I get the following error: > > gcc -O2 -Wwrite-strings -fwritable-strings -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 > -DHAVE_SYS_QUEUE_H=1 -DHAVE_GETHOSTENT=1 -DHAVE_LIBNSL=1 -DHAVE_LIBM=1 > -DHAVE_

Bug#263738: tkdesk: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'Tcl_Panic'

2005-10-28 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 04:09:09PM +0200, Andreas Jochens said > When building 'tkdesk' with gcc-3.4 I get the following error: > > gcc -O2 -g -Wall -DUSE_OLD_IMAGE -DUSE_NON_CONST -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. > -I/usr/include/tcl8.4/tcl-private/generic > -I/usr/include/tcl8.4/tk-private/generic-c -

Bug#259938: xpostit: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'malloc'

2005-10-28 Thread Rob Weir
Hi Taketoshi, On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 01:46:52PM +0200, Andreas Jochens said > When building 'xpostit' with gcc-3.4 I get the following error: > > gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/X11R6/include-Dlinux > -D__x86_64__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L > -D_POSIX_S

Bug#335976: /etc/init.d/nvidia-kernel contains bashisms

2005-10-28 Thread Jamie Heilman
New version is still broken. The way 20051026+1 is written, if NVIDIA_CARDS is 0 then make_nodes is still run, possibly creating /dev/nvidiactl needlessly. Also, expr in bash apparently lets you get away with the form of variable expansion you used, but dash does not. Look at the patch I gave you

Processed: Re: subversion: svn segfaults when doing a checkout

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 335039 important Bug#335039: subversion: svn segfaults when doing a checkout Severity set to `important'. > tags 335039 unreproducible moreinfo Bug#335039: subversion: svn segfaults when doing a checkout There were no tags set. Tags added: unr

Bug#335039: subversion: svn segfaults when doing a checkout

2005-10-28 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 335039 important tags 335039 unreproducible moreinfo thanks This isn't happening for anyone else, and there doesn't seem to be enough information in the bug report to reproduce it; downgrading accordingly. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Deb

Processed: Fixed in NMU of ots 0.4.2+cvs.2004.02.20-1.1

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 287886 + fixed Bug#287886: ots: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > tag 336046 + fixed Bug#336046: FTBFS: build conflict with gtk-doc-tools There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopp

Bug#335702: postgresql-8.1: fails to start after upgrade

2005-10-28 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi Steinar! Steinar H. Gunderson [2005-10-28 13:01 +0200]: > My guess is simply that upstream changed the data format and forgot to change > the version. They definitively changed the data format. So this indeed seems to be the error; creating a new cluster works fine (which is what I always test

Bug#328707: kernel-source-2.4.27: Compile fails

2005-10-28 Thread micah
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Björn Andersson wrote: > {standard input}: Assembler messages: > {standard input}:737: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' > {standard input}:738: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' > {standard input}:832: Error: suffix or operands in

Bug#287886: NMU

2005-10-28 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
I will NMU these bugs during the current BSP with the following patch: diff -Naur ots-0.4.2+cvs.2004.02.20.bak/debian/changelog ots-0.4.2+cvs.2004.02.20/debian/changelog --- ots-0.4.2+cvs.2004.02.20.bak/debian/changelog 2005-10-29 01:50:24.0 +0200 +++ ots-0.4.2+cvs.2004.02.20/debian

Bug#325135: marked as done (maildrop: lockmail doesn't drop privileges (CAN-2005-2655))

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:35:05 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Let version tracking deal with it has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: tagging 323956

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 > # let the further handling of the bug to the maintainer but reflect the > current state of the discussion > tags 323956 unreproducible Bug#323956: mutt: Buffer overflow in handler.c

Processed: tagging 326507

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 > # the comments in the bug contradict that and one should version tracking > anyway > tags 326507 - sarge Bug#326507: The plugin makes Firefox crash very often Tags were: sarge Tags r

Processed: tagging 325135

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 > # version tracking or not, this tag is false anyway > tags 325135 - sarge Bug#325135: maildrop: lockmail doesn't drop privileges (CAN-2005-2655) Tags were: experimental patch sarge se

Bug#334036: marked as done (kst_1.1.0-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: gcc-4.0 workaround needed)

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:03:56 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Already fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Processed: tagging 322646

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 > tags 322646 patch Bug#322646: FTBFS: Undeclared OpenGL symbols There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need ass

Processed: tagging 334997

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 > tags 334997 pending Bug#334997: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4 Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you n

Bug#334997: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4

2005-10-28 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 12:01:56AM +0200, Alejandro Exojo wrote: > El Viernes, 28 de Octubre de 2005 22:44, Frank Lichtenheld escribió: > I'm afraid that due to a domain expiration problem, I lost some mails, > including the one reporting the bug. :( > > I was aware of the FTBFS, though, so I upl

Processed: Fixed in NMU of jlint 3.0-4.1

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 334651 + fixed Bug#334651: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on texinfo Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bu

Processed: Fixed in NMU of libgnome-java 2.10.1-1.1

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 334816 + fixed Bug#334816: Uninstallable in sid on some architectures There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, De

Bug#334651: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on texinfo

2005-10-28 Thread Lars Wirzenius
I'm about to do a non-maintainer upload of jlint with the attached patch, as part of the bug squashing party going on this weekend. The bug has been open for about 10 days now, the fix is trivial, there aren't any lintian or linda errors related to the change (there are some warnings about missing

Bug#334997: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4

2005-10-28 Thread Alejandro Exojo
El Viernes, 28 de Octubre de 2005 22:44, Frank Lichtenheld escribió: > tags 334997 patch > thanks > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 01:47:11PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > kxmleditor suffers from the usual GCC 4.0 ICE on arm, hppa and m68k. > > Please use gcc-3.4 on these architectures to work aro

Bug#334816: Uninstallable in sid on some architectures

2005-10-28 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 02:32:59AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > Package: libgnome-jni > Version: 2.10.1-1 > Severity: grave > > libgnome-jni is uninstallable on i386, ia64, m68k, and powerpc because > it still depends on libgcj4 there which doesn't exists anymore. > Please upload a new versio

Processed: Re: Bug#335001: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags #335001 patch Bug#335001: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#335001: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4

2005-10-28 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
tags #335001 patch thanks On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 02:03:22PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > superkaramba suffers from the usual GCC 4.0 ICE on arm, hppa and m68k. > Please use gcc-3.4 on these architectures to work around it. I plan to NMU this during the current BSP with the following patch u

Bug#336242: kcheckgmail: does not report new message count

2005-10-28 Thread Paul Telford
Package: kcheckgmail Version: 0.5.4-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Kcheckgmail no longer show my unread message count in the taskbar icon. It was working up until recently, but today it seems to have broken. I launched the program from the command line so that I could c

Bug#336231: marked as done (svn: symbol lookup error; lib broken)

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:52:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336231: svn: symbol lookup error; lib broken has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#336051: marked as done (Still cannot load correctly...)

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:47:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336051: fixed in araneida 0.9-a3-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#328209: marked as done (util-vserver: built with wrong vserver syscall)

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:49:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328209: fixed in util-vserver 0.30.208-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:59:34PM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:55:25PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: > > I did a build-deps and and dpkg-buildpackage to make sure that I had all > > the > > build depens, but it seems as Ted said and I confirm that I n

Bug#335550: Problems with jadetex (and the list)

2005-10-28 Thread Paul Brossier
Hi, On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 10:37:36PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:59:57AM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote: > > Here it is tried to build the jadetex format with the TeX engine. > > Problem is, that it uses the LaTeX format, which was build with the > > pdfetex engine. What fil

Processed: Re: Bug#334997: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 334997 patch Bug#334997: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, D

Bug#335550: Problems with jadetex (and the list)

2005-10-28 Thread Marc Haber
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:59:57AM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote: > Here it is tried to build the jadetex format with the TeX engine. > Problem is, that it uses the LaTeX format, which was build with the > pdfetex engine. What files do you have in '/etc/texmf/fmt.d/'? What's > the content of '/etc/texm

Bug#334997: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4

2005-10-28 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
tags 334997 patch thanks On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 01:47:11PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > kxmleditor suffers from the usual GCC 4.0 ICE on arm, hppa and m68k. > Please use gcc-3.4 on these architectures to work around it. I plan to NMU this during the current BSP with the following patch unle

Processed: libpam-ssh - fails to build

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package libpam-ssh Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libpam-ssh > tags 334916 +patch Bug#334916: libpam-ssh - fails to build There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian b

Bug#334916: libpam-ssh - fails to build

2005-10-28 Thread Stefan Fritsch
package libpam-ssh tags 334916 +patch thanks the attached patch seems to fix the problem (probably due to transition to openssl 0.9.8) diff -urN libpam-ssh-1.91.0-orig/cipher.c libpam-ssh-1.91.0/cipher.c --- libpam-ssh-1.91.0-orig/cipher.c 2004-02-19 19:58:20.0 +0100 +++ libpam-ssh-1.91.

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 01:14:27PM -0700, Ted Kisner wrote: > On Friday 28 October 2005 13:02, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: > > > The Question is: why the package needs nvidia-glx-dev on amd64 and on > > > other platforms it builds succesfully without nvidia-glx-dev? > I think it's because I ha

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Ted Kisner
On Friday 28 October 2005 13:02, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: > > The Question is: why the package needs nvidia-glx-dev on amd64 and on > > other platforms it builds succesfully without nvidia-glx-dev? I think it's because I happen to be using the nvidia X driver and GL libraries... -Ted -

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Divendres 28 Octubre 2005 21:59, Artur R. Czechowski va escriure: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:55:25PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: > > I did a build-deps and and dpkg-buildpackage to make sure that I had all > > the build depens, but it seems as Ted said and I confirm that I needs th

Processed: Re: Bug#335002: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 335002 patch Bug#335002: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, D

Bug#335002: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4

2005-10-28 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
tags 335002 patch thanks On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 02:05:41PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > wordtrans suffers from the usual GCC 4.0 ICE on arm, hppa and m68k. > Please use gcc-3.4 on these architectures to work around it. I plan to NMU this during the current BSP with the following patch unles

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 09:55:25PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: > I did a build-deps and and dpkg-buildpackage to make sure that I had all the > build depens, but it seems as Ted said and I confirm that I needs the > nvidia-glx-dev. The Question is: why the package needs nvidia-glx-d

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
I did a build-deps and and dpkg-buildpackage to make sure that I had all the build depens, but it seems as Ted said and I confirm that I needs the nvidia-glx-dev. I have built the package and installed with the box updated today. I have run again the geomview and it crash in the same place :-

Processed: Re: Bug#336198: System hangs, when loading module ipw2100 with firmware

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 336198 ipw2100-source Bug#336198: System hangs, when loading module ipw2100 with firmware Warning: Unknown package 'ipw-2100' Bug reassigned from package `ipw-2100' to `ipw2100-source'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#335868: [cl-debian] Re: Bug#335868: Cannot compile and load

2005-10-28 Thread Alceste Scalas
Il giorno ven, 28/10/2005 alle 21.10 +0200, Alceste Scalas ha scritto: > Btw: please use (asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op :ironclad) for now --- I've > just discovered a packaging bug that prevents (clc:clc-require) to work > correctly. I'll fix it soon :-) (and I'll provide a quick patch if > needed) D'

Processed: your mail

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package filerunner Ignoring bugs not assigned to: filerunner > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > usertag 333484 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags were: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags are now: . > retitle 333484

Bug#333484: filerunner: fails to load

2005-10-28 Thread Stefan Fritsch
2.5.1-15 replaces /usr/lib/filerunner/bitmaps by a symlink to /usr/share/filerunner/bitmaps . The upgrade fails because of this part of Debian policy (6.4): "A directory will never be replaced by a symbolic link to a directory or vice versa; instead, the existing state (symlink or not) will be

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Ted Kisner
hmm, looks like it is complaining about the OpenGL dev libraries- I'll install and try again... -Ted On Friday 28 October 2005 12:24, Ted Kisner wrote: > I installed the build-deps and ran dpkg-buildpackage. It died for me as > well. The output is attached. > > -Ted > > On Friday 28 October 200

Processed: Re: Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 329090 kernel-patch-vserver Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does Bug reassigned from package `util-vserver' to `kernel-patch-vserver'. > retitle 329090 barrier not working, but chroot escape does on 2.4 kernel

Bug#329087: Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does

2005-10-28 Thread Ola Lundqvist
reassign 329090 kernel-patch-vserver retitle 329090 barrier not working, but chroot escape does on 2.4 kernel tags 329090 + moreinfo merge 329087 329090 thanks Hi With this information I'm now reassigning this to the kernel-patch-vserver package and merging it to the existing bug there. A simple

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Ted Kisner
I installed the build-deps and ran dpkg-buildpackage. It died for me as well. The output is attached. -Ted On Friday 28 October 2005 11:44, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: > A Divendres 28 Octubre 2005 19:10, Steve M. Robbins va escriure: > > Hello, > > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 06:16:24PM

Processed: Re: Bug#335849: tightvncserver: Unable to set fontpath in AMD64

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 335849 important Bug#335849: tightvncserver: Unable to set fontpath in AMD64 Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, D

Bug#334780: marked as done (debian-installer_20051018(mipsel/unstable): missing build-depends)

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:03:01 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334780: fixed in debian-installer 20051026 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#335868: Cannot compile and load

2005-10-28 Thread Alceste Scalas
Il giorno mer, 26/10/2005 alle 20.02 +0800, binghe ha scritto: > Package: cl-ironclad > Version: 0.9.0.dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > > I use '(clc:clc-require :ironclad)' to compile it, all of them get just errors > in cmucl, sbcl and clisp: Hmmm. I wasn't able to reproduce your errors on cmucl n

Bug#336231: svn: symbol lookup error; lib broken

2005-10-28 Thread Sigmund Scheinbar
Package: subversion Version: 1.2.3dfsg1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Invoking any of the executables in the subversion package fails like the following examle: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ svn svn: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libsvn_client-1.so.0: undefined symbol: svn_ct

Processed: Re: Bug#336219: Acknowledgement (don't let libqalculate get into testing now)

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 336219 grave Bug#336219: don't let libqalculate get into testing now Severity set to `grave'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs d

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Artur R. Czechowski
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 08:44:17PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: > > 1. apt-get source geomview > > 2. build a new deb with current libs and compiler tool chain > > 3. install and run new geomview > well, I don't have much time now, but I have problem building the packege: > I have done 1

Processed: Fixed in NMU of dvipng 1.5-2.1

2005-10-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 332702 + fixed Bug#332702: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on texinfo Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bu

Bug#332702: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on texinfo

2005-10-28 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 09:22:28AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > dvipng fails to build because it tries to use some files in the > texinfo package but does not build-depend upon it: I've NMUed this during the current BSP with the following patch: diff -Naur dvipng-1.5.bak/debian/changelog dvipng-1.5/

Bug#314988: Still a problem?

2005-10-28 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Divendres 28 Octubre 2005 19:10, Steve M. Robbins va escriure: > Hello, > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 06:16:24PM +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: > > I have updated and upgrade today, and I have installed geomview: > > ii geomview 1.8.1-9 interactive geometry viewing program > > > > I'm u

  1   2   >