Hi!
This is CAN-2005-2945, please mention it in the changelog when you fix
this.
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi!
Nice to see this vuln retroactively fixed. :-)
This particular one (code execution with "rev=") is CAN-2005-2877.
Maybe you can add it to the changelog so that future tracking is
easier?
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com
Deb
Package: lowmem
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
Justification: renders package unusable
After the initial lowmem screen warning about the low memory mode, the
language selection screen is still showed, allowing the user to choose
another language.
Then, later in the install, the system loops and become
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:47:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329091: fixed in lattice 0.12-7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 11:05:10AM +1000, Paul Szabo wrote:
> >> gnome-pty-helper can be made to write utmp/wtmp records with arbitrary
> >> DISPLAY (host) settings. I am not sure if it can be tricked into erasing
> >> existing records.
> > Why is this filed at severity: critical? What is the at
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 327297 important
Bug#327297: gramps 2.0.8-1 segfaults on startup on AMD64
Severity set to `important'.
> reassign 327297 python2.3-gnome2-extras
Bug#327297: gramps 2.0.8-1 segfaults on startup on AMD64
Bug reassigned from package `gramps' to `
2005-09-17 (土) の 20:23 +0200 に Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt さんは書きまし
た:
> Package: ultrapoint
> Version: 0.4-9
> Severity: serious
Yes. This program is no longer maintained by upstream, should be
removed.
--
Takuo KITAME
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Steve,
>> gnome-pty-helper can be made to write utmp/wtmp records with arbitrary
>> DISPLAY (host) settings. I am not sure if it can be tricked into erasing
>> existing records.
>
> Why is this filed at severity: critical? What is the attack vector here
> which permits root privilege escalation?
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 09:01:20AM +1000, Paul Szabo wrote:
> Package: libzvt2
> Version: 1.4.2-19
> Severity: critical
> File: /usr/sbin/gnome-pty-helper
> Justification: root security hole
> gnome-pty-helper can be made to write utmp/wtmp records with arbitrary
> DISPLAY (host) settings. I am no
Package: libzvt2
Version: 1.4.2-19
Severity: critical
File: /usr/sbin/gnome-pty-helper
Justification: root security hole
gnome-pty-helper can be made to write utmp/wtmp records with arbitrary
DISPLAY (host) settings. I am not sure if it can be tricked into erasing
existing records.
Demo output,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 07:00:36PM +0300, Mika Bostrom wrote:
>Package: mkisofs
>Version: 4:2.01+01a03-1
>Followup-For: Bug #329039
>
> Just experimented. Creating an image from photos:
>
>odin:..vat/digicam/Skotlanti-2005% mkisofs -r -l -J -o /tmp/skottikuvat.iso
>papercopy
>INFO: ISO-8859-15
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:47:35 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325945: fixed in muine 0.8.3-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:47:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322591: fixed in awstats 6.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 323331 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#323331: [patch] ld10k1 not 64bit clean.
Tags were: pending patch upstream
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 318543 + fixed
Bug#318543: libcorba-orbit-perl: FTBFS: static declaration of 'get_typecode'
follows non-static declaration
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
Note to NMU-ers: I will very much welcome your NMU of qtstalker. Since
I am not a DD, I depend on the willingness of a sponsor to perform the
upload. I've tried finding a sponsor several times, unfortunately
without success. So please do the NMU.
However, if you do, please consider uploading th
You're waiting on me to get 2.0.9 which was released yesterday
packaged and tested. Which is in itself dependent on available time
which right now has a great deal of time taking up with an 8 hour
full-time job, 5 hours commuting, working on tasks for paying consulting
clients and preparing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 329137 confirmed sid
Bug#329137: not installable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, sid
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs dat
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:39:09AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 04:52:59PM +0100, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
> > Am Montag 19 September 2005 15:06 schrieb Stephen R Marenka:
> > > openswan fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
> > > to bug #317475 on gcc-4.
I can reproduce the problem, too. With -J segfault, without no segfault.
My locales are set to LANG=de_DE.UTF8. I can also avoid the segfault
setting LC_CTYPE to C or POSIX (ascii charset). Other supported charsets
([EMAIL PROTECTED]: ISO-8859-15 and de_DE: ISO-8859-1) also produce a segfault.
So
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 07:42:32PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 19:28:04 +0200
> Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I uploaded mostly Martin's patch with only some changelog adjustments:
> > (Sorry to Sven for ignoring his patch, but it was easier to edit
> >
Package: azureus
Version: 2.3.0.4-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi, I'm using the last Java SDK package from SUN with make-jpkg and azureus has
problems.
It loads and then appears a message that says something about a missed plugin :
The plugin is something like "or
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 328847 RM: saxon-catalog -- RoM; old, superseded
Bug#328847: very old package, should this be removed?
Changed Bug title.
> severity 328847 normal
Bug#328847: RM: saxon-catalog -- RoM; old, superseded
Severity set to `normal'.
> reassign 32884
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 329135 http://gcc.gnu.org/23602
Bug#329135: [i386] [4.1 regression] 1081 test failures in libjava, when
configured for i486-linux
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/23602.
> tags 329135 + upstream
Bug#3291
Here's an idea... Instead of complaining that everybody keeps filing
duplicate bugs why not just fix the packages in sid? That way you
can close out all of these bugs and nobody is motivated to file
yet another duplicate.
Yes, that's acidic. But I feel I've been pretty patient with this
package.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:09:45PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:56:52AM +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
> > * Matej Vela [Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200]:
> > > Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or
> > > should we wait until someone
Package: valgrind-callgrind
Version: 0.9.12-1
Severity: grave
valgrind-callgrind isn't installable since it conflicts with valgrind >
2.6, and valgrind 3.0 is the only verison available in unstable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 329068 eperl
Bug#329068: Segfaults at startup
Bug reassigned from package `wml' to `eperl'.
> merge 328789 329068
Bug#328789: wml: segmentation fault in pass 3
Bug#329068: Segfaults at startup
Merged 328789 329068.
>
End of message, stopping
Hi,
eperl has been broken by the latest Perl upload (5.8.7-5), it now
segfaults on powerpc when loading binary modules:
$ cat tst1
<: use POSIX; :>
$ cat tst2
<: use Test; :>
$ eperl tst1
Segmentation fault
$ eperl tst2
$ ldd eperl
libperl.so.5.8 => /usr/lib/libperl.so
Package: gcc
Version: 4.1
Severity: grave
Tags: experimental, help
configuring HEAD for i486-linux (instead of the default i686-linux),
libjava fails with 1081 test failures (instead of two with
i686-linux). apparently all the execution tests fail. Compiling the
testcase by hand, and running it,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: xine-ui
Version: 0.99.3-1.1
Hi,
building a new package from source version 0.99.3-1 does not work for
me, i didn't try 0.99.4 ...
i got the same problem with my newly built 0.99.3-1.1 as with 0.99.3-1 ...
Bye, Procyon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATU
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Package: saxon-catalog
Version: 2203-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now
Hello
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:45:10PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
> Package: util-vserver
> Version: 0.30.204-5sarge2
> Severity: critical
> Tags: sarge
> Justification: root security hole
>
> Dear Ola,
>
> I found the util-vserver in sarge can not pass the test 109 and 121 of
> testfs.sh scrip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: xine-ui
Version: 0.99.3-1.1
Hi,
look here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=328129
but thanks for the solution ...
Procyon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbi
Hi, I tested the patch and it fixes the problem, thanks.
Regards,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:20:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Verified as OK
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 328276 important
Bug#328276: freewheeling: it does not start.
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 328276 moreinfo
Bug#328276: freewheeling: it does not start.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 328789 grave
Bug#328789: wml: segmentation fault in pass 3
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 328789 329068
Bug#328789: wml: segmentation fault in pass 3
Bug#329068: Segfaults at startup
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Values f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags #201611 - patch
Bug#201611: partimage-server will not install on woody system
Tags were: woody patch
Tags removed: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
> On the latest i386 Sid, gcc-4.0 does not build from source, on my machine,
> and on a buildd (see the logs). With dash as sh, I get:
this is known, we're waiting on proper 64bit support from glibc. I'd
like to downgrade this one until we have the support.
Goto, you did say, you wanted address t
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:48:49AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Package: wml
> Version: 2.0.8-11
> Severity: grave
>
> Hi,
>
> wml segfaults at startup on my (powerpc) laptop.
This is actually due to an incompatibility between eperl and perl-base
5.8.7-5, which only happens on powerpc. If yo
severity 328276 important
tags 328276 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Arnault!
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 05:04:33PM +0200, Arnault Teissier wrote:
> Package: freewheeling
> Version: 0.5pre4-4
...
> *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (out): 0x08130700 ***
Thanks for your report. I have seen this b
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 03:48:20PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
>> These grave bugs in gs-gpl are blocking work and causing trouble for
>> many people. Is there anything I can do to help get them fixed? I'm
>> happy to do NMUs if that would be h
* Daniel Baumann:
> Florian Weimer wrote:
>> could you provide details why you tagged this bug "security", please?
>
> Of course..
>
> http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-1766
>
> Heap-based buffer overflow in vidplin.dll in RealPlayer 10 and 10.5
> (6.0.12.1040 through 1069), R
Florian Weimer wrote:
> could you provide details why you tagged this bug "security", please?
Of course..
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-1766
Heap-based buffer overflow in vidplin.dll in RealPlayer 10 and 10.5
(6.0.12.1040 through 1069), RealOne Player v1 and v2, RealPlay
Hi Daniel,
could you provide details why you tagged this bug "security", please?
Which vulnerablities are fixed? Is there a CAN assignment from MITRE?
Thanks,
Florian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #No answers in the last week, packages unused, old, rc-buggy:
> retitle 327629 RM: irmp3 -- RoQA; old, unused, rc-buggy, never in stable
Bug#327629: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed?
Changed Bug title.
> severity 327629 normal
Bug#
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324195: fixed in rscheme 0.7.3.4.b1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327597: fixed in qgis 0.7.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324098: fixed in rscheme 0.7.3.4.b1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327597: fixed in qgis 0.7.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324195: fixed in rscheme 0.7.3.4.b1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324098: fixed in rscheme 0.7.3.4.b1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 04:52:59PM +0100, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
> Am Montag 19 September 2005 15:06 schrieb Stephen R Marenka:
> > openswan fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
> > to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
> > less optimization (-O2
Package: mkisofs
Version: 4:2.01+01a03-1
Followup-For: Bug #329039
Just experimented. Creating an image from photos:
odin:..vat/digicam/Skotlanti-2005% mkisofs -r -l -J -o /tmp/skottikuvat.iso
papercopy
INFO: ISO-8859-15 character encoding detected by locale settings.
Assuming ISO-88
I summarized my "research" with:
> [T]his might not apply to debian at all.
Michelle Konzack chimed in with:
> It does not affect Debian, but Mandrake and Redhat... :-)
Florian Weimer asked:
> Can you rule out that it's not reproducible with some other charset?
I can't rule anything out. If I
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 07:17:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328929: fixed in gjdoc 0.7.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:17:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324796: fixed in gs-gpl 8.15-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:17:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327288: fixed in gs-gpl 8.15-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:17:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327288: fixed in gs-gpl 8.15-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:17:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325570: fixed in gs-gpl 8.15-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:17:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324796: fixed in gs-gpl 8.15-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-8
Severity: serious
Hello,
On the latest i386 Sid, gcc-4.0 does not build from source, on my machine,
and on a buildd (see the logs). With dash as sh, I get:
Will not build the Pascal compiler: disabled for 4.0
Will build the Ada compiler.
Will build the shared A
Package: jmagick
Version: 6.0.4-0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'jmagick' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
checking for getconf... /usr/bin/getconf
checking whether large file support needs explicit enabling... no
checking for X... libraries /usr/X11R6/lib,
Am Montag 19 September 2005 15:06 schrieb Stephen R Marenka:
> Package: openswan
> Version: 1:2.2.0-11
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
> Tags: sid
>
>
> openswan fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
> to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a w
> Package: ncompress
> Version: 4.2.4-15
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
>
> Hi!
>
> There is a recent report about insecure temporary files in ncompress,
> similar to the recent advisories about gzip:
>
> http://www.zataz.net/adviso/ncompress-09052005.txt
>
> Can you please check this? Th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 328802 RM: esh -- RoM; old, unused
Bug#328802: very old package, should this be removed?
Changed Bug title.
> severity 328802 normal
Bug#328802: RM: esh -- RoM; old, unused
Severity set to `normal'.
> reassign 328802 ftp.debian.org
Bug#328802:
Package: openswan
Version: 1:2.2.0-11
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid
openswan fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
less optimization (-O2 usually works)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 328990 +pending
Bug#328990: wxwindows2.4: FTBFS on m68k due to -O3
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks.
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
tag 328990 +pending
thanks.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:50:37AM +0200, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> * Ron [Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:56:26 +0930]:
> Yep. Only, I was worried about this m68k trouble taking too long to
> get solved. It's been a while already, and until this very morning I
> had not heard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:51:13 -0700
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've emailed mhatta, but gotten no replies. Is there any hope for the
> bug fixes for the grave bugs in gs-gpl getting install soon? There
> are patches in the BT
Hi,
six(!) weeks ago, you said you will have time to upgrade in 2 weeks. But
unfortunately, since a month still nothing happened.
This bug is not a wish, it is a must fix, because it affects users
security. It is known unfixed for nearly three month now, please take it
serious and respond asap.
uild-x'
| make: *** [debian/stamp/build] Error 2
| **
| Build finished at 20050919-0120
| FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
A full buildd log is available at
<http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=emacs21&ver=21.4a
Package: lattice
Version: 0.12-7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid
lattice fails to build from source on m68k.
Here are selected excerpts from the buildd log.
| Automatic build of lattice_0.12-7-1 on thing2 by sbuild/m68k 42
| Build started
Package: util-vserver
Version: 0.30.204-5sarge2
Severity: critical
Tags: sarge
Justification: root security hole
Dear Ola,
I found the util-vserver in sarge can not pass the test 109 and 121 of
testfs.sh script[1] which provide by upstream author. After more tests,
upstream author discoveried t
Package: uqwk
Version: 2.21-11
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid
uqwk fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
less optimization (-O2 usually works) or gcc-3.3
Package: stellarium
Version: 0.6.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch.
Tags: sid
stellarium fails to build from source on m68k. This is likely due
to bug #317475 on gcc-4.0. As a workaround, you might try compiling with
less optimization (-O2 usually works
Package: kernel-patch-vserver
Severity: critical
Tags: sarge
Justification: root security hole
Dear maintainer(s),
I found the kernel-patch-vserver and util-vserver in sarge can not pass
the testfs.sh script[1] which provide by upstream author. After some more
tests, upstream author discoveryed t
Package: zaptel
Severity: serious
Justification: Fails to build from source
Version: 1:1.2.0-0beta1-1
Tags: experimental
> dh_installdocs -a
> dh_installman -a doc/ztmonitor.8.gz doc/ztcfg.8.gz doc/zttool.8.gz \
> debian/genzaptelconf.8 debian/zttest.8 debian/ztspeed.8 \
> debian/fxotune.8
> #
Re: Matej Vela in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Hi,
> > ist cabot still not ready for testing?
>
> Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or
> should we wait until someone adopts it?
As one of the caff/signing-party people, I can say that caff serves
the same purpose as cabot, i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> package liborsa-doc liborsa0 liborsa0-dev orsa xorsa
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: orsa liborsa-doc xorsa liborsa0 liborsa0-dev
> tags 328942 + pending
Bug#328942: orsa: FTBFS: doxyg
Package: yafray
Version: 0.0.7-2.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I have a mix of sid and experimental packages and also had yafray 0.8
from source installed before (and working), so sorry if this is the
cause for the crash - but yafray always crashes for me, even with th
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:47:07PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > Changes:
> > clamav (0.87-1) unstable; urgency=low
> >* New upstream version
> > - Fixes CAN-2005-2920 and CAN-2005-2919 (closes: #328660)
> > I can not find any policy about it but I think it should be urgency high or
>
* Stephen Gran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050919 14:03]:
> This one time, at band camp, Johan Thelmén said:
> >
> > Changes:
> > clamav (0.87-1) unstable; urgency=low
> >
> >* New upstream version
> > - Fixes CAN-2005-2920 and CAN-2005-2919 (closes: #328660)
> >
> > I can not find any policy
This one time, at band camp, Johan Thelmén said:
>
> Changes:
> clamav (0.87-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
>* New upstream version
> - Fixes CAN-2005-2920 and CAN-2005-2919 (closes: #328660)
>
> I can not find any policy about it but I think it should be urgency high or
> atleast medium.
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 04:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300399: fixed in openswan 1:2.2.0-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 04:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#287884: fixed in openswan 1:2.2.0-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
I agree the package should be removed.
--
Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:17:35 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line firebird: FTBFS with gcc-3.3: Uses multiline strings
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Package: crafty
Version: 20.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'crafty' on amd64/unstable,
I get the following error:
gcc -Wall -pipe -D_REENTRANT -fbranch-probabilities
-fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -march=k8 -DTBDIR=\"/var/lib/crafty/TB\" -DTABLEBASES
-DFAST -DSMP -DNU
Changes:
clamav (0.87-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version
- Fixes CAN-2005-2920 and CAN-2005-2919 (closes: #328660)
I can not find any policy about it but I think it should be urgency high or
atleast medium. This for building faster (if used) and faster moving in to
testing.
Hi,
ok a friend of mine reproduced it today, can you please
remove these three lines from default.conf in the package?
Regards Nico
--
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
pgpZCEvGyp1o8.pgp
Description: PGP signatur
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:15:38PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:28:58AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 06:05:42PM -0700, C.Y.M wrote:
>> >Package: mkisofs
>> >Version: 2.01+01a03-1
>> >Severity: grave
>> >
>> >mkisofs segfaults when creating isos.
>>
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:28:58AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 06:05:42PM -0700, C.Y.M wrote:
> >Package: mkisofs
> >Version: 2.01+01a03-1
> >Severity: grave
> >
> >mkisofs segfaults when creating isos.
> >
> >Example:
> >
> >mkisofs -dvd-video -V ISO_`date +"%d-%m-%Y"` -
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 02:47:52AM -0700, C.Y.M wrote:
>Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 06:05:42PM -0700, C.Y.M wrote:
>>
>>>Package: mkisofs
>>>Version: 2.01+01a03-1
>>>Severity: grave
>>>
>>>mkisofs segfaults when creating isos.
>>>
>>>Example:
>>>
>>>mkisofs -dvd-video -V ISO_`
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:56:52AM +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
> * Matej Vela [Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200]:
> > Let's see what the developers think. Is cabot ready for etch, or
> > should we wait until someone adopts it?
>
> #289417 and #280588 are not going to happen because las
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 329065 normal
Bug#329065: php5-sybase: sybase_ct doesn't always return correct results from
MS SQL
Severity set to `normal'.
> thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
severity 329065 important
thanks
Johan Palmqvist wrote:
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
How does this cause data loss and warrant a grave bug?
> sybase_ct doesn't always return correct results from MS SQL.
> mssql module seem to work in all cases but is not packag
* Ron [Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:56:26 +0930]:
> Hi,
> Shouldn't this be a bug against the m68k toolchain? Unless something
> in wxPython changed that I am not aware of, it has always done this
> (and not been a problem) previously, no?
Correct.
> I'm not wholly against patching this package in th
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 06:05:42PM -0700, C.Y.M wrote:
>
>>Package: mkisofs
>>Version: 2.01+01a03-1
>>Severity: grave
>>
>>mkisofs segfaults when creating isos.
>>
>>Example:
>>
>>mkisofs -dvd-video -V ISO_`date +"%d-%m-%Y"` -o image.iso image
>>
>>Segmentation fault
>
>
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
