tag 274705 + patch
thanks
So the relevant code seems to be in src/copy.c, where it checks if
"--reply=no" was set _and_ the file isn't overwritable; or if "-i" was
set, or if no option was given and the file isn't overwritable. So
"--reply=no" has an effect when you do:
touch a b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 274705 + patch
Bug#274705: mv: --reply doesn't work
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databa
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 22:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323323: fixed in obby 0.2.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 22:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323343: fixed in obby 0.2.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: destar
Version: 0.0.169-1
Severity: serious
http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=destar
I upgraded my unstable system today, and noted that quixote 2.0-0.1 is
now available, which means that destar is no longer installable in
unstable. I don't know if destar can work wi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 274705 grave
Bug#274705: mv: --reply doesn't work
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To U
Package: ctsim
Version: 4.3.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
ctsim failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder:
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -I.. -I/usr/local/include
-DDATADIR="\"/build/buildd/ctsim-4.3.3/debian/ctsim-he
Package: vdr
Version: 1.3.28-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
vdr failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder:
g++ -fPIC -g -O2 -Wall -Woverloaded-virtual -c -DREMOTE_KBD
-DLIRC_DEVICE=\"/dev/lircd\" -DRCU_DEVICE=\"/dev/ttyS1\" -DCMD_SUBMENUS
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 21:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317194: fixed in ecawave 1:0.6.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317190: fixed in ecamegapedal 0.4.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 09:55:19AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Package: swami
> Version: 0.9.2-5
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> swami fails to build because it can't read libasound.la:
> > /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=link cc -g -g -Wall -O2 -Wall -o
> > wavetbl_fluidsynth.la -rpath /usr/
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 18:17:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318994: fixed in libmodplug 1:0.7-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 18:17:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318392: fixed in libmodplug 1:0.7-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 317206 kwifimanager 4:3.3.2-5
Bug#317206: libjack0.80.0-0 removed from unstable; rebuild required
Bug reassigned from package `kdenetwork' to `kwifimanager'.
> close 317206 4:3.3.2-6
Bug#317206: libjack0.80.0-0 removed from unstable; rebuild r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 285906 pending
Bug#285906: kopete: Kopete crashes when ignoring IRC 'query'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tag 287185 pending
Bug#287185: Description of dcoprss can be improved
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tag 29239
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.5
> reassign 318180 kwifimanager 4:3.4.1-1
Bug#318180: kde: Dependance problems since introducing of xserver-xorg (3.4.1 -
SID)
Bug reassigned from package `kwifimanager' to `kwifimanager
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 18:17:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318392: fixed in libmodplug 1:0.7-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 18:17:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318994: fixed in libmodplug 1:0.7-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 18:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322900: fixed in modplugxmms 2.05-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: swt-gtk
Version: 3.0+3.1M4-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
swt-gtk fails to build because the control directory is setgid, which
is inherited from the top-level directory:
> dh_builddeb -i
> dpkg-deb: control directory has bad permissions 2755 (must be >=0755 and
> <=0775)
> dpkg-deb: b
Package: steghide
Version: 0.5.1-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
steghide fails to build because it contains a number of
incompatibilities with GCC 4.0:
> if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\" -O2
> -Wall -MT AuFile.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/AuFile.Tpo" \
> -c -o
Package: stellarium
Version: 0.6.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
stellarium fails to build because it uses stel_ui before it is declared:
> if i486-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I../src/glpng
> -I../src/stellplanet -I../src/stellastro -I../src/iniparser-Wall -O3
> -I/usr/incl
Package: soundmodem
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
soundmodem fails to build because it contains jumps into statement
expressions:
> if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/gnome-xml -I../matlib
> -I../libmisc -I../directx/include -I../directx/include/directx6 -g -O2
Package: swi-prolog
Version: 5.2.13-1
Severity: serious
swi-prolog fails to build because it segmentation faults:
>
> * QLF compilation of emacs/emacs
>
> /tmp/buildd/swi-prolog-5.2.13/debian/swi-prolog-tmp/usr/lib/swi-prolog/bin/i386/xpce
> -O -g "qcompile('ema
Package: swami
Version: 0.9.2-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
swami fails to build because it can't read libasound.la:
> /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=link cc -g -g -Wall -O2 -Wall -o
> wavetbl_fluidsynth.la -rpath /usr/lib/swami -module -avoid-version
> wavetbl_fluidsynth_la-wavetbl_fluidsy
Package: swt-motif
Version: 3.0-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
swt-motif fails to build because it can't include
:
> cc -O -s -DSWT_VERSION=3062 -DLINUX -DMOTIF -fpic -I./
> -I/bluebird/teamswt/swt-builddir/IBMJava2-141/include
> -I/bluebird/teamswt/swt-builddir/motif21/include -I/usr/X11R6/i
Package: tecnoballz
Version: 0.91-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
tecnoballz fails to build because it does not declare zexplosion
before it uses it:
> g++ -O3 -Wall -pthread -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/X11R6/includes -c -o
> src/gard_tecno.o src/gard_tecno.cc
> src/../include/../include/../include
Package: soundtracker
Version: 0.6.7-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
soundtracker fails to build because its build-dependency on
libjack0.80.0-dev cannot be satisfied:
> -> Considering libjack0.80.0-dev
>-> Trying libjack0.80.0-dev
>-> Cannot install libjack0.80.0-dev; apt errors fo
Hi all!
AFAIR I have taken all suggestions into account and generated a new
incarnation of texinfo_4.8-0.1
As with the previous versions, all files can be found at
http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/texinfo/
or
deb http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/ texinfo/
deb-src http://
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 16:32:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323649: fixed in worker 2.10.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 319121 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
Bug#319121: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on libselinux1-dev
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug#319410: imake assumes availability of selinux
Bug#320473: isdnutils: FTBFS: Missing b
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 16:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324036: fixed in gnomad2 2.8.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: base-config
Version: 2.70
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This happens :
Press enter to continue.
Setting up base-config (2.70) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/base-config.postinst: line 59: syntax error near
unexpected token `db_fset'
dpkg: error processing base-config (--
Package: gnomad2
Version: 2.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on alot of arches with the
following error:
gcc -g -O2 -o gnomad2 id3read.o gnomad2.o prefs.o filenaming.o jukebox.o
util.o mp3file.o editmeta.o filesystem.o playlists.o xfer.o data.o player.o
metadata.
Package: mysql-common
Version: 5.0.7beta-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The following is present in /etc/mysql/my.cnf:
#
# For compatibility to other Debian packages that still use
# libmysqlclient10 and libmysqlclient12.
old_passwords = 1
With these lines, mysqld fa
There have been two releases since 3.1M4, namely 3.1 and 3.2M1. From
Eclipse's download page I see that 3.1 was released for Linux x86_64,
so I suspect these bugs were fixed upstream. So, this should be fixed
once I package SWT 3.1.
Cheers,
Shaun
2005/8/19, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Pac
On Aug 19, Frederic Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > After a recent upgrade the panel applet shows an empty window without
> > widgets and when I start the program from the command line I get:
> Could you confirm the workaround added in 0.8-4 fixed this for you ?
Sorry, I forgot to send news
Package: packagesearch
Version: 1.3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is creating a shared lib and is linking that to a
static lib. This is not portable and fails on some arches with
the following error:
g++ -shared -o libdebtagsplugin.so .obj/debtagsplugin.o
.obj/debtagsplugincontainer.o .obj
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323962: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323962: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323962: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324021: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:32:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320898: fixed in lasso 0.6.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 323168
Bug#323168: larswm: ftbfs [sparc] cannot find -lselinux
Bug#319121: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on libselinux1-dev
Bug#319410: imake assumes availability of selinux
Bug#320473: isdnutils: FTBFS: Missing build depedency on libselinux1-
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:18:13PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Changes:
> snmpkit (0.9-10) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* for some misterious reasons, the Conflict line that is in the source
> did not reach the libsnmpkit2c2 deb ; so I am rebuilding it
> (closes: #3231
Package: vlc
Version: 0.8.4-svn20050810-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on 64 bit arches with the
following error:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -DSYS_LINUX -I../../../include
`top_builddir="../../.." ../../../vlc-config --cxxflags plugin skins2`
-Wsign-compa
Package: swt-gtk
Version: 3.0+3.1M4-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on 64 bit arches with the
following error:
g++ -O -DXPCOM_GLUE=1 -DMOZILLA_STRICT_API=1 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall
-DSWT_VERSION=3116 -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -fPIC -I. -I/usr/include/mozilla
-I/usr
Hi,
It still FTFBS here in an uptodate unstable chroot.
I'll upload an NMU to DELAYED later today or tomorrow, fixing this and
#218624.
cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Package: aqsis
Version: 1.1.0.20050815-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on 64 bit arches with the
following error:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../libaqsistypes -I../libaqsistyp
es -I../libaqsistypes/posix -I../render -I../libshaderexecenv -I/usr/include -g
-O2 -MT shade
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323488: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 323962 grave
Bug#323962: libsnmpkit2c2: fails to install - problems with overwriting shared
library
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 323962 323138 323488
Bug#323138: libsnmpkit2c2: Needs conflicts with libsnmpkit2c102
Bug#323488: libsnmpkit2:
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Package: gnome-blog
> Version: 0.8-3
> Severity: grave
>
> After a recent upgrade the panel applet shows an empty window without
> widgets and when I start the program from the command line I get:
Could you confirm the workaround added in 0.8-4 fixed this for you ?
Thanks
Package: libgal2.4-dev
Version: 2.4.3-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your libgal-2.4.la and libgal-a11y-2.4.la files reference the
file libgnomeprintui-2-2.la, and you do not have a dependency on
libgnomeprintui2.2-dev. This is causing build failures for other
packages. Please add a dependency on it.
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323488: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A Mennucc wrote:
> the real problem is that , for some reason, the Conflict
> line in the source is different from the one in the binary package.
> The conflicts line in the binary lacks the "libsnmpkit2c102" entry.
Hmm... weird, its definitely not in
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323488: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 04:15:58PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> libsnmp2c102 can not be upgraded to libsnmp2c2 because the latter lacks
> a "Replaces: libsnmp2c102" and thus dpkg refuses to overwrite files
> existing in both packages.
I dont think that this is so.
the real problem is that , for some
I can't seem to reproduce this; xdm works fine. :-/ It is interesting,
however, that /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm/Xsetup is missing in a fresh standard
install. Because you still have a copy:
> Sun Jun 19 14:32:31 2005 xdm info (pid 9301):
sourcing /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm/Xsetup
Could you send a co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 322541 + fixed
Bug#322541: mmv is unusable bacause of constant hangs / segmentation fault
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 314990 important
Bug#314990: xdm: cannot log in
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To
* Klaus Ethgen [Fri, 19 Aug 2005 21:58:07 +0200]:
> Package: kdm
> Version: 4:3.3.2-1
> Severity: grave
> The package has no Binary, no /usr/share/doc/kdm or other necesarry
> stuff. I wonder why nobody saws this before.
Please check your facts before submitting bugs at severity grave.
Thank
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 08:44:51PM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
>
> Can you please install libmono-dev? It is a missing build dependency.
Now it fails with this instead:
checking for mcs... /usr/bin/mcs
checking for gacutil... no
configure: error: Your mono installation doesn't expose g
tag 324018 + unreproducible
thanks
Le Ven 19 Août 2005 21:58, Klaus Ethgen a écrit :
> Package: kdm
> Version: 4:3.3.2-1
> Severity: grave
>
> dpkg -L kdm:
[...]
>
> The package has no Binary, no /usr/share/doc/kdm or other necesarry
> stuff. I wonder why nobody saws this before.
maybe you dl-ed
Package: libsnmpkit2c2
Version: 0.9-9
Severity: serious
libsnmp2c102 can not be upgraded to libsnmp2c2 because the latter lacks
a "Replaces: libsnmp2c102" and thus dpkg refuses to overwrite files
existing in both packages.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers uns
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 22:34:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324018: kdm does not have the binary in the package anymore
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 324018 + unreproducible
Bug#324018: kdm does not have the binary in the package anymore
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 323944 minor
Bug#323944: libgmp3c2: After upgrade some packages don't work
Severity set to `minor'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
severity 323944 minor
thanks
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:11:20PM +0200, Fisher wrote:
> Package: libgmp3c2
> Version: 4.1.4-10
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
> # /etc/init.d/clamav-freshclam restart
> Stopping ClamAV virus database updater: freshclam.
> Starting Cl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: kdm
Version: 4:3.3.2-1
Severity: grave
dpkg -L kdm:
/var/lib/kdm
/etc/kde3/kdm
/etc/kde3/kdm/kdm.options
/etc/kde3/kdm/Xaccess
/etc/kde3/kdm/Xreset
/etc/kde3/kdm/Xservers
/etc/kde3/kdm/Xsession
/etc/kde3/kdm/Xsetup
/etc/kde3/kdm/Xstartup
/etc
Package: cron
Version: 3.0pl1-88
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The cron daemon runs as normal until a cronjob starts up. Actually, I
don't even know if the cronjob actually starts. What I DO know is that
at the start time of any cronjob, the cron daemon process mysteriou
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 08:05:20AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:54:18PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > It's the same bug. And there is no patch yet.
> >
> > The bug in question is that, in spite of trying to pass
> > --disable-optimized to ./configure, upstream's bui
Hey whats up,
A Genuine College Degree in 2 weeks ! 1-206-350-5982 < - ccall n0ww !
Have you ever thought that the only thing stopping you from a great job and
better pay was a few letters behind your name?
Well now you can get them!
BA BSc MAMScMBA PhD
Within 2 weeks!
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 04:46:42PM +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> Thanks for the report.
> Well, #316628 was fixed. But apt seems to be changing its ABI at a daily
> basis (its another version of apt that is currently missing) :-(
> Currently I can't do anything about this, because QT3 is not yet
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:56:34AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> - the problem is still there if the new linux-image-2.6.12-1-386
> (2.6.12-5) kernel is used in the installer
- the problem is not there in the 686 image.
Bastian
--
Warp 7 -- It's a law we can live with.
signature.asc
Description:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 07:43:58PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Package: xrestop
> Version: 0.3-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> When building 'xrestop' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
> I get the following error:
> checking for XResQueryClients in -lXRes... no
> configure: error: Cannot fi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.5
> tags 318539 patch
Bug#318539: grub: FTBFS: Invalid storage class for function
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
On 8/19/05, A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi everybody
>
> I do not understand what is going on here
>
> the package libsnmpkit2c2 already contains this line:
> snmpkit-0.9/debian/control:19:Conflicts: libsnmpkit1 ( >= 0.9), libsnmpkit2,
> libsnmpkit2c102
>
> Note also that is libsnmpk
El jue, 18-08-2005 a las 18:55 +0200, Kurt Roeckx escribió:
> Package: evolution-sharp
> Version: 0.8-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package is failing to build with the following error:
> checking for mono >= 1.0.0... Package mono was not found in the pkg-config
> search path. Perhaps y
QT isn't the bottleneck anymore. But to install the latest version, alot
of dependend packages have to be removed.
I will wait for the other packages to be updated.
Perhaps its time to take a look at chroot...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
hi joey, martin,
(christian may already be on vacation, so i'll try and field some
responses from what i think is going on)
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 05:29:33PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> do you have any details to this report?
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraq&m=112354450412427&w=2
Package: dbus
Version: 0.23.4-4
Severity: serious
Hello,
now that kdelibs4 has been transitioned, dbus should be able to do the
same. Please rename the necessary packages (or well, upload the
version in experimental ;-).
The appropriate build-dependency for kdelibs is:
Build-Depends
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.5
> severity 323926 normal
Bug#323926: base-config fail to upgrade with apt
Bug#323852: unknown token: db_fset
Bug#323854: Bug in postinst script causes installation failure
Bug#323863: ba
Package: xrestop
Version: 0.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'xrestop' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
checking for XResQueryClients in -lXRes... no
configure: error: Cannot find XRes extension library
make: *** [config.status] Error 1
Please add the missi
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:17:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323883: fixed in neutrino 0.8.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323902: fixed in afterstep 2.1.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
|| On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:03:11 -0700
|| Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
kraai> Package: gnuradio-core
kraai> Version: 2.5-4
kraai> Severity: serious
kraai> gnuradio-core fails to build because of undefined references to
kraai> gr_fxpt::TWO_TO_THE_31 and gr_fxpt::PI:
Looks like thi
|| On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:03:11 -0700
|| Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
kraai> Package: gnuradio-core
kraai> Version: 2.5-4
kraai> Severity: serious
kraai> gnuradio-core fails to build because of undefined references to
kraai> gr_fxpt::TWO_TO_THE_31 and gr_fxpt::PI:
Thanks. Will
|| On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 15:43:45 -0700
|| Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
kraai> Package: gnuradio
kraai> Version: 0.9-2.1
kraai> Severity: serious
kraai> gnuradio fails to build because it build-depends on
kraai> libwxgtk2.4-python, which has been replaced by wxpython2.4-1:
Hi,
gn
Package: cron
Version: 3.0pl1-88
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.4
== is not an operator in posix test, please use = .
/etc/cron.daily/standard:
[: 83: ==: unexpected operator
[: 83: ==: unexpected operator
[: 83: ==: unexpected operator
[: 83: ==: unexpected operator
[: 83: ==: unexpe
Hi Christian!
Moritz Muehlenhoff [2005-08-09 11:08 +0200]:
> A buffer overflow in user defined functions can be exploited to
> possibly execute arbitrary code by user that have been granted the
> privilege to create user defined functions. For full details please
> see
> http://www.appsecinc.com/r
Hi!
Moritz Muehlenhoff [2005-08-09 11:08 +0200]:
> Package: mysql-dfsg
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> A buffer overflow in user defined functions can be exploited to
> possibly execute arbitrary code by user that have been granted the
> privilege to cre
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 08:47:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#266416: fixed in wdg-html-validator 1.5.7+dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Package: gcl
Version: 2.6.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
gcc -c -Wall -DVOL=volatile -fsigned-char -pipe -pg -O3
-I/tmp/buildd/gcl-2.6.6/o -I../h -I../gcl-tk num_sfun.c
num_sfun.c: In function 'number_exp':
num_sfun.c:67: error: invalid storage class for funct
Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 08:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323973: fixed in openexr 1.2.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
