Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 23:32:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320859: fixed in aptitude 0.2.15.9-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
* Steve Langasek [Mon, 01 Aug 2005 18:28:17 -0700]:
> libmpich1.0 should go through the C++ ABI transition, and the linkage of
> libpmpich++.so.1.0 should be fixed in the process.
I am working on a NMU based on the rejected from NEW 1.2.5.3-6 (but
available elsewhere), in which I'll address b
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 08:51:25PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Package: asterisk
> Version: 1:1.0.7.dfsg.1-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Running with config included in package (except a few changes for the
> bind address). I have no telephony cards; only
Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 22:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319869: fixed in cogito 0.12.1+20050730-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 22:32:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320421: fixed in windowlab 1.32-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
El dom, 31-07-2005 a las 16:02 -0700, Steve Langasek escribió:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 10:48:48PM +0100, Mark Purcell wrote:
> > Bug #315532 has been rasied as grave security related bug against
> > asterisk-1.0.7, which is included in the released sarge.
>
> > It refers to a potential overflow
Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 21:47:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318062: fixed in mozilla 2:1.7.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 21:47:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316106: fixed in mozilla 2:1.7.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 21:47:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306001: fixed in mozilla 2:1.7.10-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 21:02:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320356: fixed in trang 20030619-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 320240 libc6.1-dev
Bug#320240: g++ 4.0 doesn't compile ucontext.h on ia64
Bug reassigned from package `glibc' to `libc6.1-dev'.
> merge 318429 320240
Bug#318429: libc6.1-dev: failure with g++-4.0 caused by ucontext.h
Bug#320240: g++ 4.0 doesn'
Package: kaptain
Version: 0.71-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
kaptain fails to build because it does not forward-declare Kaptain and
because it tries to link against libXinerama:
> i486-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/qt3
> -I/usr/X11R6/include -DPIC -fPIC -DQT_THRE
Package: kmatplot
Version: 0.4-7
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
kmatplot fails to build because it cannot find libXinerama:
> /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=link --tag=CXX g++ -O0 -g -Wall -O2
> -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -o demo2d -L/usr/X11R6/lib demo2d.o
> ../widgets/libplot.a -lqt-mt
Package: lasso
Version: 0.6.2-2
Severity: serious
lasso fails to build because the getCPtr members of various classes
are inaccessible due to their protection level:
> mcs -out:lasso.dll -target:library ./*.cs
...
> ./Defederation.cs(84) error CS0122: 'lasso.SamlNameIdentifier.getCPtr' is
> inac
Package: ldaptor
Version: 0.0.41
Severity: serious
ldaptor fails to build because it build-depends on python2.3-epydoc,
which is no longer available:
> -> Considering python2.3-epydoc
>-> Trying python2.3-epydoc
>-> Cannot install python2.3-epydoc; apt errors follow:
> Reading packa
Package: im-sdk
Version: 11.4.1870-7
Severity: serious
im-sdk fails to build because a number of variables are declared both
static and non-static:
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -I. -I../../../../include
> -DARCH=\"i686\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DLinux -Wall -MT bengali.lo -MD -MP -MF
> .d
Package: kurush
Version: 0.11-1
Severity: serious
kurush fails to build because it cannot find dh_netdeps:
> dh_netdeps -pkurush
> make: dh_netdeps: Command not found
--
Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: jlint
Version: 2.3-4
Severity: serious
jlint fails to build because it contains two undefined references to
std::_Rb_tree_insert_and_rebalance:
> g++ -g -o jlint access_desc.o callee_desc.o class_desc.o graph.o jlint.o
> local_context.o locks.o message_node.o method_desc.o
> locks.o: In
Package: k3d
Version: 0.4.5.0-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
k3d fails to build because Value has an incomplete type:
> source='document.cpp' object='document.lo' libtool=yes \
> depfile='.deps/document.Plo' tmpdepfile='.deps/document.TPlo' \
> depmode=gcc3 /bin/sh ../depcomp \
> /bin/sh ../libt
Package: ion2
Version: 20040729-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
ion2 fails to build because it cannot find Xinerama.h:
> gcc -g -Os -W -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -Wcomment -Wtrigraphs
> -Wformat -Wchar-subscripts -Wparentheses -pedantic -Wuninitialized
> -DCF_XFREE86_TEXTPROP_BUG_WORKARO
Package: inventor
Version: 2.1.5-10-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
inventor fails to build because it does not forward-declare
SoTempPath:
> /usr/bin/g++-g -D_REENTRANT -O3-DIVBINDIR=\"/usr/bin\"
> -DIVLIBDIR=\"/usr/lib\" -DIVHDRTOP=\"/usr/include/Inventor\"
> -DIVFONTPATH=\"/usr/share
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 318249 normal
Bug#318249: bumprace: Fails to run on AMD64
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 318429 grave
Bug#318429: libc6.1-dev: failure with g++-4.0 caused by ucontext.h
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 318429 320240
Bug#318429: libc6.1-dev: failure with g++-4.0 caused by ucontext.h
Bug#320240: g++ 4.0 doesn't compile ucontext.h on
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 318249 grave
Bug#318249: bumprace: Fails to run on AMD64
Severity set to `grave'.
> tags 320240 + patch
Bug#320240: g++ 4.0 doesn't compile ucontext.h on ia64
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> tags 320240 + fixed-upstream
Bug#320240
At Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:38:17 +0200,
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Before applying a patch, I would like to hear why this bug affects
> > only sparc?
>
> No, it's not sparc-specific. What I meant is that, from a release
> management point of view, it is preventing xorg-x11 from being a
> candidate
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 320240 grave
Bug#320240: g++ 4.0 doesn't compile ucontext.h on ia64
Severity set to `grave'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 19:02:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317838: fixed in kismet 2005.06.R1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 18:47:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#314856: fixed in sqlite3 3.2.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: libmpich1.0
Version: 1.2.5.3-5
Severity: serious
Justification: missing package dependencies; mislinked libraries
The libpmpich++.so.1.0 library in this package is not linked against
libraries that it depends on:
$ ldd -d -r /usr/lib/libpmpich++.so.1.0
libg2c.so.0 => /us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I recently adopted this package and wasn't aware that this was
broken. I have decided to not support an upgrade path from version
older than 2.6. The faulty code that was intended to handle the
upgrade has been removed in preparation for the nex
Package: asterisk
Version: 1:1.0.7.dfsg.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Running with config included in package (except a few changes for the
bind address). I have no telephony cards; only IP. Editing
/etc/default/asterisk, to enable the commented-out debug options give
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 05:08:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:17:38AM +0100, Paul Brossier wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:17:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > But the package is not *in* etch, so the fact that it's uninstallable in
> > > etch is not groun
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:17:38AM +0100, Paul Brossier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:17:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > But the package is not *in* etch, so the fact that it's uninstallable in
> > etch is not grounds for a grave bug.
> sorry, i miss the reasonning. does the fact that
Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 21:12:44 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line problem fixed in gksu 1.3.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
> It seems so. I tried with $LANG set to C, de_DE.UTF-8 and [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> with exactly the same result, bogofilter getting stuck in an endless
> loop.
Okay. What if you comment out the charset_default line in your config?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.2.15.9-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is currently failing to build on 64 bit arches
because of an old/broken configure check for gettext. configure
shows:
checking for GNU gettext in libc... no
checking for GNU gettext in libintl... no
checking whether to use
Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 16:32:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318981: fixed in evolution 2.2.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:17:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> But the package is not *in* etch, so the fact that it's uninstallable in
> etch is not grounds for a grave bug.
sorry, i miss the reasonning. does the fact that this version is broken
grounds for an open bug, or should all sid-only
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Package windowlab
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: windowlab
> tags 320421 = pending
Bug#320421: wrong and hardcoded dependencies
There were no tags set.
Tags set to: pending
> Thanks control
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
Hi,
Clint Adams wrote:
[bogofilter gets stuck in an endless loop]
>Do you experience the same problem if you set your locale to C or
>de_DE.UTF-8 ?
It seems so. I tried with $LANG set to C, de_DE.UTF-8 and [EMAIL PROTECTED],
with exactly the same result, bogofilter getting stuck in an endless
loo
Hi,
your bug number came up on irc and did lead to some discussion.
In conclusion there are a two things:
1.) you are abusing debconf
23:57 < doogie> data: Debian.News
23:57 < doogie> or some such
23:57 < doogie> do not do upgrades notices with debconf
23:57 < doogie> deb(ian) conf(iguration)
severity 320784 normal
thanks
Daily images can be broken sometimes (like the images dated 31-07-2005)...
On Monday 01 August 2005 14:29, Torok Edwin wrote:
> Debian-installer-version:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/etch_d-i/i386/20050709/de
>bian-testing-i386-netinst.iso uname -a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 314856
Bug#314856: libsqlite3-0: Missing pre-dependency on debconf.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 320784 normal
Bug#320784: installation-reports: missing script & packages from CD
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package cheesetracker
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: cheesetracker
> tag 320743 pending
Bug#320743: cheesetracker: upload version 0.9.9-2.1 breaks C++ abi transition,
please reupload as soon as new qt3 is available
There were no tags set.
Tags added:
Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 14:02:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316348: fixed in sqlite3 3.2.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 14:02:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#314856: fixed in sqlite3 3.2.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 14:02:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317594: fixed in sqlite3 3.2.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 22:26:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line A new version has been uploaded to sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
tags 320826 + patch
retitle 320826 FTBFS: Missing pkg-config build-dependency
thanks
Hi,
The FTBFS is due to a missing build dependency on pkg-config. The
following diff fixes this:
diff -urN gs-esp-8+8.15rc3.dfsg.1.original/debian/control
gs-esp-8+8.15rc3.dfsg.1/debian/control
--- gs-esp-8+8
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 320826 + patch
Bug#320826: FTBFS: src/fapi_ft.c: FreeType include directory missing in search
path
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> retitle 320826 FTBFS: Missing pkg-config build-dependency
Bug#320826: FTBFS: src/fapi_ft.c: FreeType in
severity 320733 important
thanks
this is not grave, since apparently unreproducible/with easy workaround.
Maybe duplicate? -> 320257.
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexander Sack | : :' : The universal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Opera
.
Regards,
Roger
Automatic build of gs-esp_8+8.15rc3.dfsg.1-1 on hardknott by sbuild/powerpc 1.7
Build started at 20050801-1915
**
gs-esp_8+8.15rc3.dfsg.1-1.dsc exists in cwd
** Using build dependencies supplied by
Hi,
Can you please provide more information? I'm not seeing any information
about vulnerabilities that were fixed in 1.0.0rc1. I also do not see a
release for 1.0.0rc2.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 320733 important
Bug#320733: thunderbird bug
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UN
Package: bigloo
Version: 2.6f+2.7a-050721-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
gcj --main=jigloo -o build-tree/bigloo2.7a/bin/jigloo
build-tree/bigloo2.7a/jigloo/jigloo.java
build-tree/bigloo2.7a/jigloo/jigloo.java:0: error: Can't find default packag
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 06:26:44PM +0100, Paul Brossier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 06:01:25PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Aug 01, Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > as you say, the working solution is not yet. the bug should remain open.
> > There is nothing to be solve
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 278479 + patch
Bug#278479: PCI ID database should be in /var -- policy violation
Tags were: sarge-ignore
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 320794 libdjvulibre1
Bug#320794: evince: Evince missing library libdjvulibre.so
Warning: Unknown package 'libdvjulibre1'
Bug reassigned from package `libdvjulibre1' to `libdj
A patch to make pciutils place pci.ids under /var. It also cleans up old
pci.ids.{new,neww,old} files on configure/purge (see #281413).
Of course, Debsums still complains when pci.ids are updated. It would be
better to have the update-pciids script divert pci.ids out of the way
the first time
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 320794 libdvjulibre1
Bug#320794: evince: Evince missing library libdjvulibre.so
Warning: Unknown package 'libdvjulibre1'
Bug reassigned from package `djvulibre' to `libdvjuli
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 320794 libdvjulibre1
Bug#320794: evince: Evince missing library libdjvulibre.so
Warning: Unknown package 'libdvjulibre1'
Warning: Unknown package 'libdvjulibre1'
Bug reassign
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 320799 0.3.0-1
Bug#320799: rtorrent: Depends on non-existant libtorrent4
Bug marked as found in version 0.3.0-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: libmusicbrainz-2.1
> Version: 2.1.1-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Under the 0-day NMU policy for the C++ ABI transition, I have prepared an
> NMU for libmusicbrainz-2.1, because this library provides C++ interfaces and
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 06:01:25PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 01, Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > as you say, the working solution is not yet. the bug should remain open.
> There is nothing to be solved. Recent udev releaes require a modern
> kernel. If you disagree with my
Pawel Wiecek wrote:
> On Jul 30, 11:22am, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Finally, the reason this bug is grave, vpopmail's author says that
> > version 5.4.6 contains fixed for SQL injection vulnerabilities which
>
> This one doesn't apply to current Debian package.
Ok, in that case this bug report is not
Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 09:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318365: fixed in amule 2.0.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:47:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:58:11 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:50:04 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:50:04 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:58:11 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.2
> severity 320608 normal
Bug#320608: several security holes in vpopmail
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Your message dated Mon, 1 Aug 2005 18:01:14 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:50:04 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:50:04 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:58:11 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:50:04 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:59:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:59:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 09:47:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318572: fixed in amule 2.0.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 09:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317692: fixed in aptitude 0.2.15.9-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 09:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#263267: fixed in aptitude 0.2.15.9-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 09:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317692: fixed in aptitude 0.2.15.9-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 1 Aug 2005 18:01:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317332: 2.6.12 has been uploaded
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: imcom
Version: 1.33-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This message, received from an Adium client (using Growl?), crashes
imcom. Actually, *any* message sent from this Adium user crashes my imcom
client.
lord almighty
lord almighty
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Traceba
* GOTO Masanori [Tue, 02 Aug 2005 00:12:49 +0900]:
> At Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:24:19 +0200,
> Adeodato Sims wrote:
> > > This bug also affects xorg-x11, which FTBFS with current l-k-h as some
> > > input
> > > drivers #include
> > Hello,
> > Please consider prioritizing this bug, since we can't
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 320801 grave
Bug#320801: aptitude: borken dependency from libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.9
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 320801 317692
Bug#317692: aptitude: depends on unavaiable libsigc++-1.2-5c102
Bug#320801: aptitude: borken dependency from liba
Your message dated Mon, 1 Aug 2005 16:22:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gs-esp: FTBFS: stp patch (libgimpprint1-dev will be removed
shortly)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 08:02:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320715: fixed in synaptic 0.57.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 01 Aug 2005 08:02:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297970: fixed in synaptic 0.57.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
This one time, at band camp, Salvatore said:
> Subject: clamav-freshclam fail because it want a newer version of software
> Package: clamav
> Version: 0.84-2.sarge.1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
An actual report would be good here. As far as I am aware, freshclam
do
At Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:24:19 +0200,
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > This bug also affects xorg-x11, which FTBFS with current l-k-h as some input
> > drivers #include
>
> Hello,
>
> Please consider prioritizing this bug, since we can't get a first
> build of xorg-x11 on SPARC until it gets fixed (pre
Package: rtorrent
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
rtorrent relies on the currently non-existant libtorrent4 on the i386
platform, making it non-installable on that platform
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (103, 'testing'), (10
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Well, even though i thought i fixed this in helsinki, there seems to be no
mkvmlinuz support in the powerpc images, thus the image is not usable, at
least for none-yaboot users.
I will work on fixing this now, but wanted
reassign 320794 djvulibre
thanks
Le lundi 01 août 2005 à 16:52 +0300, Rossen Naydenov a écrit :
> Subject: evince: Evince missing library libdjvulibre.so
> Package: evince
> Version: 0.3.0-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> *** Please type your report below this lin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 320794 djvulibre
Bug#320794: evince: Evince missing library libdjvulibre.so
Bug reassigned from package `evince' to `djvulibre'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
severity 277652 important
severity 320742 important
merge 277652 320742
thanks
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 10:19:12AM +0400, Victor Wagner wrote:
> If there is a file in /etc/logrotate.d, which refers to some glob
> pattern (in my case it was /var/log/mgetty/*.log), and there is no files
> matching thi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 319598 vlc
Bug#319598: wxvlc / vlc depends on libwxgtk2.4 (not installable) - see also
wishlist
Bug reassigned from package `wxvlc' to `vlc'.
> merge 319292 319598
Bug#319292: vlc is not sid installable because libwxgtk2.4 isn't.
Bug#319598:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 277652 important
Bug#277652: logrotate doesn't work properly when a package is removed
Severity set to `important'.
> severity 320742 important
Bug#320742: logrotate: Logrotate breaks if unmatched glob pattern is found
Severity set to `importa
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
